Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] help with my home work

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Complete the required [**Template**](https://kapextmediassl-a.akamaihd.net/nursing/NU502/NU502_2405C/NU502_Unit_6_Template.docx). – Include 10 theories. It is your choice within the categories. – 2 Grand theories, 3 Middle Range theories (high – middle – low. 1 each) – 1 Sociologic, 1 Behavioral a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Complete the required [**Template**](https://kapextmediassl-a.akamaihd.net/nursing/NU502/NU502_2405C/NU502_Unit_6_Template.docx).
    – Include 10 theories. It is your choice within the categories.
    – 2 Grand theories, 3 Middle Range theories (high – middle – low. 1 each)
    – 1 Sociologic, 1 Behavioral and 1 Biomedical, 1 Leadership, 1 Ethical.
    – Complete the columns for each theory/ model.
    – Single space and cite appropriately. You may use bullets.
    ### **Assignment Requirements:**
    Before finalizing your work, you should:
    – Complete the template fully for each of the 10 theories you chose and each column.
    – The content will likely be 3- 4 full pages in landscape layout.
    – Be sure to cite and include a reference page.
    – A title page is not necessary if you include your name and front content.
    – Edit to ensure readability and neatness
    – Use five (5) credible sources of support as required.
    Your writing assignment should:
    – Follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).
    – Be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful.
    – Display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics.
    – Use APA 7th edition format.
    \
    NU502_Unit_6_Template.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nu502-unit-6-template-docx "NU502_Unit_6_Template.docx")

  • [Solved] business

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In 3-4 paragraphs, reflect on what you have learned about leadership theories, styles, and ethical leadership principles. Using this knowledge, define what leadership means to you and describe the foundational elements of your leadership identity. Guiding Questions: – Which leadership theories or mo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In 3-4 paragraphs, reflect on what you have learned about leadership theories, styles, and ethical leadership principles. Using this knowledge, define what leadership means to you and describe the foundational elements of your leadership identity.
    Guiding Questions:
    – Which leadership theories or models resonate most with you, and why?
    – What is your natural leadership style, and how does it influence your approach to leadership?
    – How do ethical and holistic leadership principles shape your leadership philosophy?
    – Identify the top two concepts of leadership you have learned that you feel are imperative in developing your leadership skills.
    I am a transformational leader

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module3ConceptAnalysisPaper.docx – ## Module3-ConceptAnalysisExample-21.docx **## Module3ConceptAnalysisPaper.docx** **Module 3:** _Concept Analysis Paper_ Choose a terminology related to the health area (Nursing), and develop the concept analysis step by step, following the [example guide in t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module3ConceptAnalysisPaper.docx

    – ## Module3-ConceptAnalysisExample-21.docx

    **## Module3ConceptAnalysisPaper.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Concept Analysis Paper_

    Choose a terminology related to the health area (Nursing), and develop the concept analysis step by step, following the
    [example guide in the attachment](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/39910/files/10402259?wrap=1) [Download example guide in the attachment](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/39910/files/10402259/download?download_frd=1).

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **## Module3-ConceptAnalysisExample-21.docx**

    **CONCEPT ANALYSIS**

    I select the word:
    **Stressor** for my Concept Analysis Paper Project from Betty Neuman’ System Model. A concept analysis paper for nursing involves conducting a literature review, identifying the key characteristics or attributes of the concept, identifying its antecedents and consequences and apply them to a model case.

    **Introduction**

    The exposure to stressful situations is the most common human experiences, the severity of these situations, many times unexpected, elicits a stress response. The impact of stress is different from one individual to other. The various types of emotional, physical, social, and spiritual responses that a person has to stress are set in close relation by stress hormones. Anything that poses a challenge or a threat to our wellbeing is a stress. Some stresses get you going and they are good for you, however, when the stresses undermine both our mental and physical health they are bad. In this Concept Analysis Paper, I will be focusing on stress that is bad for us.

    **Stressor Self Concept**

    The term stress, from my perspective, better describe a disruption of the harmony or equilibrium cause by a stimulus, phenomenon or event that trigger a response: emotional, physical, mental or spiritual. Stress can be a positive or negative response, as a consequence of a stimulus. Every response is different and unique, even in from of the same stimulus. The stressor sources vary from internal and external.

    **Related Words**

    ![Image result for stress coping mechanism self esteem words](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20937217)

    **Literature Review**

    **Psychology Definition of Stress:**

    Stress refers to the emotional and physiological reactions experienced when an individual confronts a situation in which the demands go beyond their coping resources.

    **Medical Definition of Stress:**
    In a medical or biological context stress is a physical, mental, or emotional factor that causes bodily or mental tension. Stresses can be external (from the environment, psychological, or social situations) or internal (illness, or from a medical procedure).

    **Definition of stress by Merriam-Webster Dictionary:**

    Stress is a constraining force or influence: such as

    a: a force exerted when one body or body part presses on, pulls on, pushes against, or tends to compress or twist another body or body part; especially: the intensity of this mutual force commonly expressed in pounds per square inch

    b: the deformation caused in a body by such a force

    c: a physical, chemical, or emotional factor that causes bodily or mental tension and may be a factor in disease causation

    d: a state resulting from a stress; especially: one of bodily or mental tension resulting from factors that tend to alter an existent equilibrium.

    e: strain, pressure <the environment is under stress to the point of collapse.

    **Chemical Definition of stressor:**

    A substance that forces change, usually damage, on living organisms or ecosystems, or reduces their ability to cope with environmental changes. This occurs when the substance is released unplanned and unwanted into an
    [environment](http://thelawdictionary.org/environment/).

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |

    Stress is a dynamic process, a review of the literature revealed a variety of disciplines that utilize the term stress. The majority of the literature was found in the disciplines of psychology and medicine.

    **Identify Key Characters**

    1- Coping mechanism.

    2- Adaptive response.

    3- Problem solving.

    4- Physical and mental equilibrium.

    5- Self-esteem.

    6- Interpersonal relationships.

    7- Response to challenge.

    8- Self-efficacy.

    **Identify Antecedents and Consequences**

    Stress is a multiplicative function of perceived consequences and the degree of disparity between perceived demand and perceived ability to face it.

    **Antecedents:**

    The significant antecedent of stress is individual's perception of a situation.

    1- Deficient development of psychological coping mechanism to confront stressful situations.

    2- Unable to acquire the maximum effective adaptive response to deal with complex and unexpected circumstances.

    3- Inability to improve the capacity to solve difficult situations stablishing strategies.

    4- Impediment to keep an adequate mental and physical balance for health adjustment.

    5- Decrease of self-perception, self-image, confidence and abilities to react

    6- Inconsistent and negative relationships as support system.

    7- Incapacity to face challenges properly.

    8- Personal incompetence, negativism, demotivation and pessimism to deal with demanding issues.

    **Consequences:**

    The significant outcomes or consequences of stress are effective coping, mastery, and positive adaptation.

    1- Ineffective coping mechanism.

    2- Insufficient adaptive response.

    3- Unsuccessful problem solving.

    4- Disturbances of physical and mental equilibrium.

    5- Self-esteem problems.

    6- Inability to stablish interpersonal relationships as support system.

    7- Inadequate response to challenge.

    8- Incompetent Self-efficacy.

    **Concept Analysis Model Conclusion**

    Fall Risk is a recurrent problem in the Home Health setting, physical, psychological, and cost related connotations are the most significant. This problem see under Betty Neuman’s System Model (NSM) can be prevented. NSM uses primary, secondary, as well as tertiary prevention mechanisms for maintenance, attainment, and retention for optimal patient system wellness. The Model incorporated both the individual and the environment in determining client safety. Neuman’s Model is holistic, universal, comprehensive, and flexible system. Its primary objective is concentrate on the client response system, as a core, towards the potential or actual environment stressors. When the client core structure is broken by stressors the normal defense line, which represent client wellness or adaptation state, is invade compromising the client equilibrium.

    **Study Case:**

    Based on NSM,
    **stressors** found to promote fall:

    1- Intra-personal stressors: urinary urgency, anxiety, and poor vision.

    2- Inter-personal stressor: Feel irritable and anxious when need to call for assistance and is unable to see the call light. Lack of social, and family usual support.

    3- Extra-personal stressor: Change to a new place, and lack of the confidence family support for his necessities.

    Mr. S. was invaded in too short time for multiples stressors (describe above) which penetrates his
    **lines of defenses**, the system integrity was not maintained, and a variance for wellness occurred with the risk for falling, and injury.

    **Prevention**:

    1- Primary: Education provide to a client to call for assistance when feel urinary urgency and bathroom necessities leaving the call light within client reach. Providing staffing rounds and supervision frequently to check client status. Request specialties consultation to reevaluate client symptoms.

    2- Secondary: Administering medications ordered for BPH and Glaucoma, to decrease uncomfortable symptoms. Exploring anxiety and irritability triggers and decreasing episode frequencies. Allowing that client to verbalize feelings: fears, anger, and desires to provide adequate symptoms treatment and support. Allowing family to visit resident to provide support. Providing adequate support system when assisting client necessities.

    3- Tertiary: Reeducation, maintain the highest client wellness, achieiving goals in order to maintain the client stability and avoid fall.

    **Reconstitution** started after identification of stressors breaking client lines of defense, appropriate Nursing interventions focus on retaining or maintaining system stability with the application of primary, secondary and tertiary interventions in attempt to restore or maintain the stability of the client system.

    Through the
    **Nursing Application of NSM** is possible to achieve goals:

    1-
    **Nursing Diagnosis -** Based on this assessment of stressors and physiological and psychological findings, the nursing diagnosis of actual or perceived threat to variance in wellness was disturbance due to decrease in vision, urinary urgency, anxiousness. The nurse and patient reviewed the diagnosis and negotiated goals.

    2-
    **Nursing Goals -** The expected outcome is that the patient will verbalize acceptance of the idea of his vision loss, and decrease autonomy.

    3-
    **Nursing Outcomes** – Primary and secondary planned interventions are done with a nurse to explore the patient’s feelings about diagnosis, symptoms and meaning the disease has and modifications of expectations and activities. The nurse evaluated the goals after applying the interventions. The patient developed a therapeutic relationship with nurses. The patient openly shared and displayed feelings with nurses, expressed fears, anxiety. The nurses will work with patient to establish long term goals that relate to the adjustment of having a serious illness with an uncertain impact in his wellness.

    NSM is an efficient tool used to evaluate systems interactions, and prevent client injuries. Health staffing can identify fall risk factors, same as, the stressors interactions breaking the defense lines of the body. The Model application can be useful not only in the primary prevention when the fall problem did not take place, and it is possible to reinforce the flexible line of defense, but even in secondary prevention to assist in the system restoration, and in the tertiary to maintain stability in order to avoid more damage in the progression to body equilibrium. I can conclude, with this study case example, that we can successfully apply the NSM in order to provide fall precaution and prevention.

    **References**

    Koolhaas JM et al. (2011). Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35 (5): 1291–1301

    Lazarus R S and Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York, Springer

    Schneiderman N, Ironson G & Siegel SD (2005). Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 1: 607-628

    Thoits, P. A. (1994). Stressors and problem-solving: The individual as psychological activist. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(2) 143-160

    University of Kansas Medical Center: Concept Analysis Tutorial "Journal of Advanced Nursing"; Rethinking Concept Analysis; M. Risjord; 2009

    Ume-Nwagbo, P. N., DeWan, S. A., & Lowry, Lois W. (2006). Using the Neuman Systems Model for Best Practices. Nursing Science Quarterly, 19 (1), 31-35

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## Module3-ConceptAnalysisExample-21.docx**

    **CONCEPT ANALYSIS**

    I select the word:
    **Stressor** for my Concept Analysis Paper Project from Betty Neuman’ System Model. A concept analysis paper for nursing involves conducting a literature review, identifying the key characteristics or attributes of the concept, identifying its antecedents and consequences and apply them to a model case.

    **Introduction**

    The exposure to stressful situations is the most common human experiences, the severity of these situations, many times unexpected, elicits a stress response. The impact of stress is different from one individual to other. The various types of emotional, physical, social, and spiritual responses that a person has to stress are set in close relation by stress hormones. Anything that poses a challenge or a threat to our wellbeing is a stress. Some stresses get you going and they are good for you, however, when the stresses undermine both our mental and physical health they are bad. In this Concept Analysis Paper, I will be focusing on stress that is bad for us.

    **Stressor Self Concept**

    The term stress, from my perspective, better describe a disruption of the harmony or equilibrium cause by a stimulus, phenomenon or event that trigger a response: emotional, physical, mental or spiritual. Stress can be a positive or negative response, as a consequence of a stimulus. Every response is different and unique, even in from of the same stimulus. The stressor sources vary from internal and external.

    **Related Words**

    ![Image result for stress coping mechanism self esteem words](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20937217)

    **Literature Review**

    **Psychology Definition of Stress:**

    Stress refers to the emotional and physiological reactions experienced when an individual confronts a situation in which the demands go beyond their coping resources.

    **Medical Definition of Stress:**
    In a medical or biological context stress is a physical, mental, or emotional factor that causes bodily or mental tension. Stresses can be external (from the environment, psychological, or social situations) or internal (illness, or from a medical procedure).

    **Definition of stress by Merriam-Webster Dictionary:**

    Stress is a constraining force or influence: such as

    a: a force exerted when one body or body part presses on, pulls on, pushes against, or tends to compress or twist another body or body part; especially: the intensity of this mutual force commonly expressed in pounds per square inch

    b: the deformation caused in a body by such a force

    c: a physical, chemical, or emotional factor that causes bodily or mental tension and may be a factor in disease causation

    d: a state resulting from a stress; especially: one of bodily or mental tension resulting from factors that tend to alter an existent equilibrium.

    e: strain, pressure <the environment is under stress to the point of collapse.

    **Chemical Definition of stressor:**

    A substance that forces change, usually damage, on living organisms or ecosystems, or reduces their ability to cope with environmental changes. This occurs when the substance is released unplanned and unwanted into an
    [environment](http://thelawdictionary.org/environment/).

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |

    Stress is a dynamic process, a review of the literature revealed a variety of disciplines that utilize the term stress. The majority of the literature was found in the disciplines of psychology and medicine.

    **Identify Key Characters**

    1- Coping mechanism.

    2- Adaptive response.

    3- Problem solving.

    4- Physical and mental equilibrium.

    5- Self-esteem.

    6- Interpersonal relationships.

    7- Response to challenge.

    8- Self-efficacy.

    **Identify Antecedents and Consequences**

    Stress is a multiplicative function of perceived consequences and the degree of disparity between perceived demand and perceived ability to face it.

    **Antecedents:**

    The significant antecedent of stress is individual's perception of a situation.

    1- Deficient development of psychological coping mechanism to confront stressful situations.

    2- Unable to acquire the maximum effective adaptive response to deal with complex and unexpected circumstances.

    3- Inability to improve the capacity to solve difficult situations stablishing strategies.

    4- Impediment to keep an adequate mental and physical balance for health adjustment.

    5- Decrease of self-perception, self-image, confidence and abilities to react

    6- Inconsistent and negative relationships as support system.

    7- Incapacity to face challenges properly.

    8- Personal incompetence, negativism, demotivation and pessimism to deal with demanding issues.

    **Consequences:**

    The significant outcomes or consequences of stress are effective coping, mastery, and positive adaptation.

    1- Ineffective coping mechanism.

    2- Insufficient adaptive response.

    3- Unsuccessful problem solving.

    4- Disturbances of physical and mental equilibrium.

    5- Self-esteem problems.

    6- Inability to stablish interpersonal relationships as support system.

    7- Inadequate response to challenge.

    8- Incompetent Self-efficacy.

    **Concept Analysis Model Conclusion**

    Fall Risk is a recurrent problem in the Home Health setting, physical, psychological, and cost related connotations are the most significant. This problem see under Betty Neuman’s System Model (NSM) can be prevented. NSM uses primary, secondary, as well as tertiary prevention mechanisms for maintenance, attainment, and retention for optimal patient system wellness. The Model incorporated both the individual and the environment in determining client safety. Neuman’s Model is holistic, universal, comprehensive, and flexible system. Its primary objective is concentrate on the client response system, as a core, towards the potential or actual environment stressors. When the client core structure is broken by stressors the normal defense line, which represent client wellness or adaptation state, is invade compromising the client equilibrium.

    **Study Case:**

    Based on NSM,
    **stressors** found to promote fall:

    1- Intra-personal stressors: urinary urgency, anxiety, and poor vision.

    2- Inter-personal stressor: Feel irritable and anxious when need to call for assistance and is unable to see the call light. Lack of social, and family usual support.

    3- Extra-personal stressor: Change to a new place, and lack of the confidence family support for his necessities.

    Mr. S. was invaded in too short time for multiples stressors (describe above) which penetrates his
    **lines of defenses**, the system integrity was not maintained, and a variance for wellness occurred with the risk for falling, and injury.

    **Prevention**:

    1- Primary: Education provide to a client to call for assistance when feel urinary urgency and bathroom necessities leaving the call light within client reach. Providing staffing rounds and supervision frequently to check client status. Request specialties consultation to reevaluate client symptoms.

    2- Secondary: Administering medications ordered for BPH and Glaucoma, to decrease uncomfortable symptoms. Exploring anxiety and irritability triggers and decreasing episode frequencies. Allowing that client to verbalize feelings: fears, anger, and desires to provide adequate symptoms treatment and support. Allowing family to visit resident to provide support. Providing adequate support system when assisting client necessities.

    3- Tertiary: Reeducation, maintain the highest client wellness, achieiving goals in order to maintain the client stability and avoid fall.

    **Reconstitution** started after identification of stressors breaking client lines of defense, appropriate Nursing interventions focus on retaining or maintaining system stability with the application of primary, secondary and tertiary interventions in attempt to restore or maintain the stability of the client system.

    Through the
    **Nursing Application of NSM** is possible to achieve goals:

    1-
    **Nursing Diagnosis -** Based on this assessment of stressors and physiological and psychological findings, the nursing diagnosis of actual or perceived threat to variance in wellness was disturbance due to decrease in vision, urinary urgency, anxiousness. The nurse and patient reviewed the diagnosis and negotiated goals.

    2-
    **Nursing Goals -** The expected outcome is that the patient will verbalize acceptance of the idea of his vision loss, and decrease autonomy.

    3-
    **Nursing Outcomes** – Primary and secondary planned interventions are done with a nurse to explore the patient’s feelings about diagnosis, symptoms and meaning the disease has and modifications of expectations and activities. The nurse evaluated the goals after applying the interventions. The patient developed a therapeutic relationship with nurses. The patient openly shared and displayed feelings with nurses, expressed fears, anxiety. The nurses will work with patient to establish long term goals that relate to the adjustment of having a serious illness with an uncertain impact in his wellness.

    NSM is an efficient tool used to evaluate systems interactions, and prevent client injuries. Health staffing can identify fall risk factors, same as, the stressors interactions breaking the defense lines of the body. The Model application can be useful not only in the primary prevention when the fall problem did not take place, and it is possible to reinforce the flexible line of defense, but even in secondary prevention to assist in the system restoration, and in the tertiary to maintain stability in order to avoid more damage in the progression to body equilibrium. I can conclude, with this study case example, that we can successfully apply the NSM in order to provide fall precaution and prevention.

    **References**

    Koolhaas JM et al. (2011). Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35 (5): 1291–1301

    Lazarus R S and Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York, Springer

    Schneiderman N, Ironson G & Siegel SD (2005). Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 1: 607-628

    Thoits, P. A. (1994). Stressors and problem-solving: The individual as psychological activist. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(2) 143-160

    University of Kansas Medical Center: Concept Analysis Tutorial "Journal of Advanced Nursing"; Rethinking Concept Analysis; M. Risjord; 2009

    Ume-Nwagbo, P. N., DeWan, S. A., & Lowry, Lois W. (2006). Using the Neuman Systems Model for Best Practices. Nursing Science Quarterly, 19 (1), 31-35

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## Module3ConceptAnalysisPaper.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Concept Analysis Paper_

    Choose a terminology related to the health area (Nursing), and develop the concept analysis step by step, following the
    [example guide in the attachment](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/39910/files/10402259?wrap=1) [Download example guide in the attachment](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/39910/files/10402259/download?download_frd=1).

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **## Module3-ConceptAnalysisExample-21.docx**

    **CONCEPT ANALYSIS**

    I select the word:
    **Stressor** for my Concept Analysis Paper Project from Betty Neuman’ System Model. A concept analysis paper for nursing involves conducting a literature review, identifying the key characteristics or attributes of the concept, identifying its antecedents and consequences and apply them to a model case.

    **Introduction**

    The exposure to stressful situations is the most common human experiences, the severity of these situations, many times unexpected, elicits a stress response. The impact of stress is different from one individual to other. The various types of emotional, physical, social, and spiritual responses that a person has to stress are set in close relation by stress hormones. Anything that poses a challenge or a threat to our wellbeing is a stress. Some stresses get you going and they are good for you, however, when the stresses undermine both our mental and physical health they are bad. In this Concept Analysis Paper, I will be focusing on stress that is bad for us.

    **Stressor Self Concept**

    The term stress, from my perspective, better describe a disruption of the harmony or equilibrium cause by a stimulus, phenomenon or event that trigger a response: emotional, physical, mental or spiritual. Stress can be a positive or negative response, as a consequence of a stimulus. Every response is different and unique, even in from of the same stimulus. The stressor sources vary from internal and external.

    **Related Words**

    ![Image result for stress coping mechanism self esteem words](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20937217)

    **Literature Review**

    **Psychology Definition of Stress:**

    Stress refers to the emotional and physiological reactions experienced when an individual confronts a situation in which the demands go beyond their coping resources.

    **Medical Definition of Stress:**
    In a medical or biological context stress is a physical, mental, or emotional factor that causes bodily or mental tension. Stresses can be external (from the environment, psychological, or social situations) or internal (illness, or from a medical procedure).

    **Definition of stress by Merriam-Webster Dictionary:**

    Stress is a constraining force or influence: such as

    a: a force exerted when one body or body part presses on, pulls on, pushes against, or tends to compress or twist another body or body part; especially: the intensity of this mutual force commonly expressed in pounds per square inch

    b: the deformation caused in a body by such a force

    c: a physical, chemical, or emotional factor that causes bodily or mental tension and may be a factor in disease causation

    d: a state resulting from a stress; especially: one of bodily or mental tension resulting from factors that tend to alter an existent equilibrium.

    e: strain, pressure <the environment is under stress to the point of collapse.

    **Chemical Definition of stressor:**

    A substance that forces change, usually damage, on living organisms or ecosystems, or reduces their ability to cope with environmental changes. This occurs when the substance is released unplanned and unwanted into an
    [environment](http://thelawdictionary.org/environment/).

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |

    Stress is a dynamic process, a review of the literature revealed a variety of disciplines that utilize the term stress. The majority of the literature was found in the disciplines of psychology and medicine.

    **Identify Key Characters**

    1- Coping mechanism.

    2- Adaptive response.

    3- Problem solving.

    4- Physical and mental equilibrium.

    5- Self-esteem.

    6- Interpersonal relationships.

    7- Response to challenge.

    8- Self-efficacy.

    **Identify Antecedents and Consequences**

    Stress is a multiplicative function of perceived consequences and the degree of disparity between perceived demand and perceived ability to face it.

    **Antecedents:**

    The significant antecedent of stress is individual's perception of a situation.

    1- Deficient development of psychological coping mechanism to confront stressful situations.

    2- Unable to acquire the maximum effective adaptive response to deal with complex and unexpected circumstances.

    3- Inability to improve the capacity to solve difficult situations stablishing strategies.

    4- Impediment to keep an adequate mental and physical balance for health adjustment.

    5- Decrease of self-perception, self-image, confidence and abilities to react

    6- Inconsistent and negative relationships as support system.

    7- Incapacity to face challenges properly.

    8- Personal incompetence, negativism, demotivation and pessimism to deal with demanding issues.

    **Consequences:**

    The significant outcomes or consequences of stress are effective coping, mastery, and positive adaptation.

    1- Ineffective coping mechanism.

    2- Insufficient adaptive response.

    3- Unsuccessful problem solving.

    4- Disturbances of physical and mental equilibrium.

    5- Self-esteem problems.

    6- Inability to stablish interpersonal relationships as support system.

    7- Inadequate response to challenge.

    8- Incompetent Self-efficacy.

    **Concept Analysis Model Conclusion**

    Fall Risk is a recurrent problem in the Home Health setting, physical, psychological, and cost related connotations are the most significant. This problem see under Betty Neuman’s System Model (NSM) can be prevented. NSM uses primary, secondary, as well as tertiary prevention mechanisms for maintenance, attainment, and retention for optimal patient system wellness. The Model incorporated both the individual and the environment in determining client safety. Neuman’s Model is holistic, universal, comprehensive, and flexible system. Its primary objective is concentrate on the client response system, as a core, towards the potential or actual environment stressors. When the client core structure is broken by stressors the normal defense line, which represent client wellness or adaptation state, is invade compromising the client equilibrium.

    **Study Case:**

    Based on NSM,
    **stressors** found to promote fall:

    1- Intra-personal stressors: urinary urgency, anxiety, and poor vision.

    2- Inter-personal stressor: Feel irritable and anxious when need to call for assistance and is unable to see the call light. Lack of social, and family usual support.

    3- Extra-personal stressor: Change to a new place, and lack of the confidence family support for his necessities.

    Mr. S. was invaded in too short time for multiples stressors (describe above) which penetrates his
    **lines of defenses**, the system integrity was not maintained, and a variance for wellness occurred with the risk for falling, and injury.

    **Prevention**:

    1- Primary: Education provide to a client to call for assistance when feel urinary urgency and bathroom necessities leaving the call light within client reach. Providing staffing rounds and supervision frequently to check client status. Request specialties consultation to reevaluate client symptoms.

    2- Secondary: Administering medications ordered for BPH and Glaucoma, to decrease uncomfortable symptoms. Exploring anxiety and irritability triggers and decreasing episode frequencies. Allowing that client to verbalize feelings: fears, anger, and desires to provide adequate symptoms treatment and support. Allowing family to visit resident to provide support. Providing adequate support system when assisting client necessities.

    3- Tertiary: Reeducation, maintain the highest client wellness, achieiving goals in order to maintain the client stability and avoid fall.

    **Reconstitution** started after identification of stressors breaking client lines of defense, appropriate Nursing interventions focus on retaining or maintaining system stability with the application of primary, secondary and tertiary interventions in attempt to restore or maintain the stability of the client system.

    Through the
    **Nursing Application of NSM** is possible to achieve goals:

    1-
    **Nursing Diagnosis -** Based on this assessment of stressors and physiological and psychological findings, the nursing diagnosis of actual or perceived threat to variance in wellness was disturbance due to decrease in vision, urinary urgency, anxiousness. The nurse and patient reviewed the diagnosis and negotiated goals.

    2-
    **Nursing Goals -** The expected outcome is that the patient will verbalize acceptance of the idea of his vision loss, and decrease autonomy.

    3-
    **Nursing Outcomes** – Primary and secondary planned interventions are done with a nurse to explore the patient’s feelings about diagnosis, symptoms and meaning the disease has and modifications of expectations and activities. The nurse evaluated the goals after applying the interventions. The patient developed a therapeutic relationship with nurses. The patient openly shared and displayed feelings with nurses, expressed fears, anxiety. The nurses will work with patient to establish long term goals that relate to the adjustment of having a serious illness with an uncertain impact in his wellness.

    NSM is an efficient tool used to evaluate systems interactions, and prevent client injuries. Health staffing can identify fall risk factors, same as, the stressors interactions breaking the defense lines of the body. The Model application can be useful not only in the primary prevention when the fall problem did not take place, and it is possible to reinforce the flexible line of defense, but even in secondary prevention to assist in the system restoration, and in the tertiary to maintain stability in order to avoid more damage in the progression to body equilibrium. I can conclude, with this study case example, that we can successfully apply the NSM in order to provide fall precaution and prevention.

    **References**

    Koolhaas JM et al. (2011). Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35 (5): 1291–1301

    Lazarus R S and Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York, Springer

    Schneiderman N, Ironson G & Siegel SD (2005). Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 1: 607-628

    Thoits, P. A. (1994). Stressors and problem-solving: The individual as psychological activist. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(2) 143-160

    University of Kansas Medical Center: Concept Analysis Tutorial "Journal of Advanced Nursing"; Rethinking Concept Analysis; M. Risjord; 2009

    Ume-Nwagbo, P. N., DeWan, S. A., & Lowry, Lois W. (2006). Using the Neuman Systems Model for Best Practices. Nursing Science Quarterly, 19 (1), 31-35

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## Module3ConceptAnalysisPaper.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Concept Analysis Paper_

    Choose a terminology related to the health area (Nursing), and develop the concept analysis step by step, following the
    [example guide in the attachment](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/39910/files/10402259?wrap=1) [Download example guide in the attachment](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/39910/files/10402259/download?download_frd=1).

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **## Module3-ConceptAnalysisExample-21.docx**

    **CONCEPT ANALYSIS**

    I select the word:
    **Stressor** for my Concept Analysis Paper Project from Betty Neuman’ System Model. A concept analysis paper for nursing involves conducting a literature review, identifying the key characteristics or attributes of the concept, identifying its antecedents and consequences and apply them to a model case.

    **Introduction**

    The exposure to stressful situations is the most common human experiences, the severity of these situations, many times unexpected, elicits a stress response. The impact of stress is different from one individual to other. The various types of emotional, physical, social, and spiritual responses that a person has to stress are set in close relation by stress hormones. Anything that poses a challenge or a threat to our wellbeing is a stress. Some stresses get you going and they are good for you, however, when the stresses undermine both our mental and physical health they are bad. In this Concept Analysis Paper, I will be focusing on stress that is bad for us.

    **Stressor Self Concept**

    The term stress, from my perspective, better describe a disruption of the harmony or equilibrium cause by a stimulus, phenomenon or event that trigger a response: emotional, physical, mental or spiritual. Stress can be a positive or negative response, as a consequence of a stimulus. Every response is different and unique, even in from of the same stimulus. The stressor sources vary from internal and external.

    **Related Words**

    ![Image result for stress coping mechanism self esteem words](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assigment-apa-seven-all-instructions-attached-20937217)

    **Literature Review**

    **Psychology Definition of Stress:**

    Stress refers to the emotional and physiological reactions experienced when an individual confronts a situation in which the demands go beyond their coping resources.

    **Medical Definition of Stress:**
    In a medical or biological context stress is a physical, mental, or emotional factor that causes bodily or mental tension. Stresses can be external (from the environment, psychological, or social situations) or internal (illness, or from a medical procedure).

    **Definition of stress by Merriam-Webster Dictionary:**

    Stress is a constraining force or influence: such as

    a: a force exerted when one body or body part presses on, pulls on, pushes against, or tends to compress or twist another body or body part; especially: the intensity of this mutual force commonly expressed in pounds per square inch

    b: the deformation caused in a body by such a force

    c: a physical, chemical, or emotional factor that causes bodily or mental tension and may be a factor in disease causation

    d: a state resulting from a stress; especially: one of bodily or mental tension resulting from factors that tend to alter an existent equilibrium.

    e: strain, pressure <the environment is under stress to the point of collapse.

    **Chemical Definition of stressor:**

    A substance that forces change, usually damage, on living organisms or ecosystems, or reduces their ability to cope with environmental changes. This occurs when the substance is released unplanned and unwanted into an
    [environment](http://thelawdictionary.org/environment/).

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |

    Stress is a dynamic process, a review of the literature revealed a variety of disciplines that utilize the term stress. The majority of the literature was found in the disciplines of psychology and medicine.

    **Identify Key Characters**

    1- Coping mechanism.

    2- Adaptive response.

    3- Problem solving.

    4- Physical and mental equilibrium.

    5- Self-esteem.

    6- Interpersonal relationships.

    7- Response to challenge.

    8- Self-efficacy.

    **Identify Antecedents and Consequences**

    Stress is a multiplicative function of perceived consequences and the degree of disparity between perceived demand and perceived ability to face it.

    **Antecedents:**

    The significant antecedent of stress is individual's perception of a situation.

    1- Deficient development of psychological coping mechanism to confront stressful situations.

    2- Unable to acquire the maximum effective adaptive response to deal with complex and unexpected circumstances.

    3- Inability to improve the capacity to solve difficult situations stablishing strategies.

    4- Impediment to keep an adequate mental and physical balance for health adjustment.

    5- Decrease of self-perception, self-image, confidence and abilities to react

    6- Inconsistent and negative relationships as support system.

    7- Incapacity to face challenges properly.

    8- Personal incompetence, negativism, demotivation and pessimism to deal with demanding issues.

    **Consequences:**

    The significant outcomes or consequences of stress are effective coping, mastery, and positive adaptation.

    1- Ineffective coping mechanism.

    2- Insufficient adaptive response.

    3- Unsuccessful problem solving.

    4- Disturbances of physical and mental equilibrium.

    5- Self-esteem problems.

    6- Inability to stablish interpersonal relationships as support system.

    7- Inadequate response to challenge.

    8- Incompetent Self-efficacy.

    **Concept Analysis Model Conclusion**

    Fall Risk is a recurrent problem in the Home Health setting, physical, psychological, and cost related connotations are the most significant. This problem see under Betty Neuman’s System Model (NSM) can be prevented. NSM uses primary, secondary, as well as tertiary prevention mechanisms for maintenance, attainment, and retention for optimal patient system wellness. The Model incorporated both the individual and the environment in determining client safety. Neuman’s Model is holistic, universal, comprehensive, and flexible system. Its primary objective is concentrate on the client response system, as a core, towards the potential or actual environment stressors. When the client core structure is broken by stressors the normal defense line, which represent client wellness or adaptation state, is invade compromising the client equilibrium.

    **Study Case:**

    Based on NSM,
    **stressors** found to promote fall:

    1- Intra-personal stressors: urinary urgency, anxiety, and poor vision.

    2- Inter-personal stressor: Feel irritable and anxious when need to call for assistance and is unable to see the call light. Lack of social, and family usual support.

    3- Extra-personal stressor: Change to a new place, and lack of the confidence family support for his necessities.

    Mr. S. was invaded in too short time for multiples stressors (describe above) which penetrates his
    **lines of defenses**, the system integrity was not maintained, and a variance for wellness occurred with the risk for falling, and injury.

    **Prevention**:

    1- Primary: Education provide to a client to call for assistance when feel urinary urgency and bathroom necessities leaving the call light within client reach. Providing staffing rounds and supervision frequently to check client status. Request specialties consultation to reevaluate client symptoms.

    2- Secondary: Administering medications ordered for BPH and Glaucoma, to decrease uncomfortable symptoms. Exploring anxiety and irritability triggers and decreasing episode frequencies. Allowing that client to verbalize feelings: fears, anger, and desires to provide adequate symptoms treatment and support. Allowing family to visit resident to provide support. Providing adequate support system when assisting client necessities.

    3- Tertiary: Reeducation, maintain the highest client wellness, achieiving goals in order to maintain the client stability and avoid fall.

    **Reconstitution** started after identification of stressors breaking client lines of defense, appropriate Nursing interventions focus on retaining or maintaining system stability with the application of primary, secondary and tertiary interventions in attempt to restore or maintain the stability of the client system.

    Through the
    **Nursing Application of NSM** is possible to achieve goals:

    1-
    **Nursing Diagnosis -** Based on this assessment of stressors and physiological and psychological findings, the nursing diagnosis of actual or perceived threat to variance in wellness was disturbance due to decrease in vision, urinary urgency, anxiousness. The nurse and patient reviewed the diagnosis and negotiated goals.

    2-
    **Nursing Goals -** The expected outcome is that the patient will verbalize acceptance of the idea of his vision loss, and decrease autonomy.

    3-
    **Nursing Outcomes** – Primary and secondary planned interventions are done with a nurse to explore the patient’s feelings about diagnosis, symptoms and meaning the disease has and modifications of expectations and activities. The nurse evaluated the goals after applying the interventions. The patient developed a therapeutic relationship with nurses. The patient openly shared and displayed feelings with nurses, expressed fears, anxiety. The nurses will work with patient to establish long term goals that relate to the adjustment of having a serious illness with an uncertain impact in his wellness.

    NSM is an efficient tool used to evaluate systems interactions, and prevent client injuries. Health staffing can identify fall risk factors, same as, the stressors interactions breaking the defense lines of the body. The Model application can be useful not only in the primary prevention when the fall problem did not take place, and it is possible to reinforce the flexible line of defense, but even in secondary prevention to assist in the system restoration, and in the tertiary to maintain stability in order to avoid more damage in the progression to body equilibrium. I can conclude, with this study case example, that we can successfully apply the NSM in order to provide fall precaution and prevention.

    **References**

    Koolhaas JM et al. (2011). Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35 (5): 1291–1301

    Lazarus R S and Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York, Springer

    Schneiderman N, Ironson G & Siegel SD (2005). Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 1: 607-628

    Thoits, P. A. (1994). Stressors and problem-solving: The individual as psychological activist. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(2) 143-160

    University of Kansas Medical Center: Concept Analysis Tutorial "Journal of Advanced Nursing"; Rethinking Concept Analysis; M. Risjord; 2009

    Ume-Nwagbo, P. N., DeWan, S. A., & Lowry, Lois W. (2006). Using the Neuman Systems Model for Best Practices. Nursing Science Quarterly, 19 (1), 31-35

    **image1.jpeg**

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] nur

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your expertise – ## healthPolicyasign1.docx **## healthPolicyasign1.docx** **_Agency Synopsis_** Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system within the US, create a table listing your 5 regulatory agencies and address the following: 1. Describe the agency, le…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your expertise

    – ## healthPolicyasign1.docx

    **## healthPolicyasign1.docx**

    **_Agency Synopsis_**

    Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system within the US, create a table listing your 5 regulatory agencies and address the following:

    1. Describe the agency, level of regulatory authority (local, state, federal), scope of regulatory authority, and role within the US healthcare system.

    2. Address relevance of the organization or the organization’s authority to the APRN/DNP graduate.

    3. Describe relevance to specialty area, area of practice, or setting of practice. For an example, mental health.

    **## healthPolicyasign1.docx**

    **_Agency Synopsis_**

    Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system within the US, create a table listing your 5 regulatory agencies and address the following:

    1. Describe the agency, level of regulatory authority (local, state, federal), scope of regulatory authority, and role within the US healthcare system.

    2. Address relevance of the organization or the organization’s authority to the APRN/DNP graduate.

    3. Describe relevance to specialty area, area of practice, or setting of practice. For an example, mental health.

  • [Solved] Family Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    https://video.alexanderstreet.com/p/nRO2BP00l **About "Mother and Daughter: A Cultural Tale"** Therapist [**Gonzalo Bacigalupe**](https://video-alexanderstreet-com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/search?ff[]=personFilter:gonzalo-bacigalupe&sort=real_title_asc) (Thousand Oaks, CA: [**Masterswork Productions…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    https://video.alexanderstreet.com/p/nRO2BP00l
    **About "Mother and Daughter: A Cultural Tale"**
    Therapist [**Gonzalo Bacigalupe**](https://video-alexanderstreet-com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/search?ff[]=personFilter:gonzalo-bacigalupe&sort=real_title_asc) (Thousand Oaks, CA: [**Masterswork Productions**](https://video-alexanderstreet-com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/search?ff[]=organizationFilter:masterswork-productions&sort=real_title_asc), 2003), 1 hour 16 minutes
    An interview with an Irani immigrant mother and her 23 year old daughter highlights the difference that their cultural lenses create in their mutual expectations. Very typical of children becoming Americanized, the daughter wants to fit into the social scene with her friends while the mother wants her to respect the cultural norms of her generation from Iran. The way she dresses, the fact that she doesn't live with her mother even though she is unmarried, the amount of time devoted to family, are all at issue in this session. Their therapist, who is also an Irani woman is present at the consultation. How do we assist families in this predicament? In an epilogue to the program Gonzalo makes his session transparent and provides afterthoughts about the work.
    \
    Document.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/document-pdf-10390529 "Document.pdf")
    \
    NRNP_PRAC_6645_ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationExemplar_rev.4.2022.doc](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nrnp-prac-6645-comprehensivepsychiatricevaluationexemplar-rev-4-2022-doc-10390531 "NRNP_PRAC_6645_ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationExemplar_rev.4.2022.doc")
    \
    NRNPPRAC6645ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationNoteTemplate1.doc](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nrnpprac6645comprehensivepsychiatricevaluationnotetemplate1-doc-10390533 "NRNPPRAC6645ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationNoteTemplate1.doc")

  • [Solved] appendix H: synthesis and recommendations tool

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Week2Asignment8512.docx – ## AppendixH.docx **## Week2Asignment8512.docx** appendix H: synthesis and recommendations tool "Synthesis is where you take multiple pieces of evidence or multiple sources and their ideas and you talk about the connections between those ideas or those sources. " – OA…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Week2Asignment8512.docx

    – ## AppendixH.docx

    **## Week2Asignment8512.docx**

    appendix H: synthesis and recommendations tool

    "Synthesis is where you take multiple pieces of evidence or multiple sources and their ideas and you talk about the connections between those ideas or those sources. "

    – OASIS (2016, transcript para. 3)

    Evidence synthesis is defined as a step and method used to appraise and analyze data in systematic reviews. Evidence synthesis is critical to appraising and analyzing a review of your collected evidence in order to identify common themes, produce new insights, and identify conflicting evidence that might impact your project design.

    In NURS 8312, you completed Appendices E, F, and G. In this module, you will complete the Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document. You will also evaluate the overall strength of your evidence.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/modules/items/7765010)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the Learning Resources in this module. Pay particular attention to the evidence synthesis tutorial in the Walden Writing Center.

    · Download the
    [Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/files/15154743?wrap=1) [Download Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/files/15154743/download?download_frd=1).

    **The Assignment (Form)**

    Complete the Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document.

    **Remember Research Project Topic Please.**

    **Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Adults Patients with Anxiety Disorder. It’s a continuation please**

    **## AppendixH.docx**

    Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals

    Synthesis and Recommendations Tool

    Appendix H

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/appendix-h-synthesis-and-recommendations-tool)

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | EBP Question: |
    | **Strength** | **Number of Sources (Quantity)** | **Synthesized Findings With Article Number(s)**<br>(This is <br>_not_ a simple restating of information from each individual evidence summary—see directions) |
    | Level | Overall Quality Rating <br>(Strong, good, or low) | | |
    | **Level I**<br>· Experimental studies | | | |
    | **Level II**<br>· Quasi-experimental studies | | | |
    | **Level III**<br>· Nonexperimental, including qualitative studies | | | |
    | **Level IV**<br>· Clinical practice guidelines or consensus panels | | | |
    | **Level V**<br>· Literature reviews, QI, case reports, expert opinion | | | |

    | |
    | — |
    | **Where does the evidence show consistency?** |
    | |
    | **Where does the evidence show inconsistency?** |
    | |
    | **Best evidence recommendations (taking into consideration the quantity, consistency, and strength of the evidence):** |
    | |
    | **Based on your synthesis, select the statement that best describes the overall characteristics of the body of evidence.** |
    | ☐<br>**Strong & compelling evidence, consistent results** Recommendations are reliable; evaluate for organizational translation.<br> <br>☐<br>**Good evidence & consistent results** Recommendations may be reliable; evaluate for risk and organizational translation.<br> <br>☐<br>**Good evidence but conflicting results** Unable to establish best practice based on current evidence; evaluate risk, consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project.<br> <br>☐<br>**Little or no evidence** Unable to establish best practice based on current evidence; consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project. |

    **See Chapter 11, Lessons from Practice, for examples of completed tools.**

    ****Directions for use of the Synthesis and Recommendations Tool****

    ****Purpose**:**

    **This tool guides the EBP team through the process of synthesizing the pertinent findings from the Individual Evidence Summary (Appendix G), sorted by evidence level, to create an overall picture of the body of the evidence related to the PICO question. The synthesis process uses quantity, strength (level and quality), and consistency to generate the best evidence recommendations for potential translation.**

    ****Overall quality rating and the total number of sources:****

    **Record the overall quality rating and the number of sources for each level (strong, good, or low), ensuring agreement among the team members.**

    ****Synthesized findings:****

    **This section captures key findings that answer the EBP question. Using the questions below, generate a comprehensive synthesis by combining the different pieces of evidence in the form of succinct statements that enhance the team’s knowledge and generate new insights, perspectives, and understandings into a greater whole. The following questions can help guide the team’s discussion of the evidence:**

    **· How can the evidence in each of the levels be organized to produce a more comprehensive understanding of the big picture?**

    **· What themes do you notice?**

    **· What elements of the intervention/setting/sample seem to influence the outcome?**

    **· What are the important takeaways?**

    **Avoid repeating content and/or copying and pasting directly from the Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Record the article number(s) used to generate each synthesis statement to make the source of findings easy to identify.**

    **Using this synthesis tool requires not only the critical thinking of the whole team but also group discussion and consensus building. The team reviews the individual evidence summary of high- and good-quality articles, uses subjective and objective reasoning to look for salient themes, and evaluates information to create higher-level insights. They include and consider the strength and consistency of findings in their evaluation.**

    ****Where does the evidence show consistency/inconsistency?****

    **EBP teams must consider how consistent the results are across studies. Do the studies tend to show the same conclusions, or are there differences? The synthesized evidence is much more compelling when most studies have the same general results or point in the same general direction. The synthesized evidence is less compelling when the results from half the studies have one indication, while the findings from the other half point in a different direction. The team should identify the points of consistency among the evidence as well as areas where the inconsistency is apparent. Both factors are important to consider when developing recommendations or determining the next steps.**

    ****Best evidence recommendations:****

    **In this section, the EBP team takes into consideration all the above information related to the strength, quantity, and consistency of the synthesized findings at each level to generate best practice recommendations from the evidence. Consider:**

    **· What is the strength and quantity of studies related to a specific evidence recommendation?**

    **· Is there a sufficient number of high-strength studies to support one recommendation over another?**

    **· Are there any recommendations that can be ruled out based on the strength and quantity of the evidence?**

    **· Does the team feel the evidence is of sufficient strength and quantity to be considered a best evidence recommendation?**

    **Recommendations should be succinct statements that distill the synthesized evidence into an answer to the EBP question. The team bases these recommendations on the evidence and does not yet consider their specific setting. Translating the recommendations into action steps within the team’s organization occurs in the next step (Translation and Action Planning Tool, Appendix I).**

    ****Based on the synthesis, which statement represents the overall body of the evidence?****

    **Choose the statement that best reflects the strength and congruence of the findings. This determination will help the team to decide the next steps in the translation process**
    ****.****

    **When evidence is**
    **_strong_ (includes multiple high-quality studies of Level I and Level II evidence), compelling, and consistent, EBP teams can have greater confidence in best practice recommendations and should begin organizational translation**

    **When most of the evidence is**
    **_good_ (high-quality Level II and Level III)**
    **_and_ _consistent_ or**
    **_good_ _but_ _conflicting_, the team should proceed cautiously in making practice changes. In this instance, translation typically includes evaluating risk and careful consideration for organizational translation.**

    **The team makes practice changes primarily when evidence exists that is of high to good strength. Never make practice changes on**
    **_little to no evidence_ (low-quality evidence at any level or Level IV or Level V evidence alone). Nonetheless, teams have a variety of options for actions that include but are not limited to, creating awareness campaigns, conducting informational and educational updates, monitoring evidence sources for new information, and designing research studies.**

    **The exact quantity of sources needed to determine the strength of the evidence is subjective and depends on many factors, including the topic and the amount of available literature. The EBP team should discuss what they consider sufficient given their knowledge of the problem, literature, and setting**

    **© 2022 Johns Hopkins Health System/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing Page |**
    ****4****

    **## image1.jpeg**

    **## AppendixH.docx**

    Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals

    Synthesis and Recommendations Tool

    Appendix H

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/appendix-h-synthesis-and-recommendations-tool)

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | EBP Question: |
    | **Strength** | **Number of Sources (Quantity)** | **Synthesized Findings With Article Number(s)**<br>(This is <br>_not_ a simple restating of information from each individual evidence summary—see directions) |
    | Level | Overall Quality Rating <br>(Strong, good, or low) | | |
    | **Level I**<br>· Experimental studies | | | |
    | **Level II**<br>· Quasi-experimental studies | | | |
    | **Level III**<br>· Nonexperimental, including qualitative studies | | | |
    | **Level IV**<br>· Clinical practice guidelines or consensus panels | | | |
    | **Level V**<br>· Literature reviews, QI, case reports, expert opinion | | | |

    | |
    | — |
    | **Where does the evidence show consistency?** |
    | |
    | **Where does the evidence show inconsistency?** |
    | |
    | **Best evidence recommendations (taking into consideration the quantity, consistency, and strength of the evidence):** |
    | |
    | **Based on your synthesis, select the statement that best describes the overall characteristics of the body of evidence.** |
    | ☐<br>**Strong & compelling evidence, consistent results** Recommendations are reliable; evaluate for organizational translation.<br> <br>☐<br>**Good evidence & consistent results** Recommendations may be reliable; evaluate for risk and organizational translation.<br> <br>☐<br>**Good evidence but conflicting results** Unable to establish best practice based on current evidence; evaluate risk, consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project.<br> <br>☐<br>**Little or no evidence** Unable to establish best practice based on current evidence; consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project. |

    **See Chapter 11, Lessons from Practice, for examples of completed tools.**

    ****Directions for use of the Synthesis and Recommendations Tool****

    ****Purpose**:**

    **This tool guides the EBP team through the process of synthesizing the pertinent findings from the Individual Evidence Summary (Appendix G), sorted by evidence level, to create an overall picture of the body of the evidence related to the PICO question. The synthesis process uses quantity, strength (level and quality), and consistency to generate the best evidence recommendations for potential translation.**

    ****Overall quality rating and the total number of sources:****

    **Record the overall quality rating and the number of sources for each level (strong, good, or low), ensuring agreement among the team members.**

    ****Synthesized findings:****

    **This section captures key findings that answer the EBP question. Using the questions below, generate a comprehensive synthesis by combining the different pieces of evidence in the form of succinct statements that enhance the team’s knowledge and generate new insights, perspectives, and understandings into a greater whole. The following questions can help guide the team’s discussion of the evidence:**

    **· How can the evidence in each of the levels be organized to produce a more comprehensive understanding of the big picture?**

    **· What themes do you notice?**

    **· What elements of the intervention/setting/sample seem to influence the outcome?**

    **· What are the important takeaways?**

    **Avoid repeating content and/or copying and pasting directly from the Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Record the article number(s) used to generate each synthesis statement to make the source of findings easy to identify.**

    **Using this synthesis tool requires not only the critical thinking of the whole team but also group discussion and consensus building. The team reviews the individual evidence summary of high- and good-quality articles, uses subjective and objective reasoning to look for salient themes, and evaluates information to create higher-level insights. They include and consider the strength and consistency of findings in their evaluation.**

    ****Where does the evidence show consistency/inconsistency?****

    **EBP teams must consider how consistent the results are across studies. Do the studies tend to show the same conclusions, or are there differences? The synthesized evidence is much more compelling when most studies have the same general results or point in the same general direction. The synthesized evidence is less compelling when the results from half the studies have one indication, while the findings from the other half point in a different direction. The team should identify the points of consistency among the evidence as well as areas where the inconsistency is apparent. Both factors are important to consider when developing recommendations or determining the next steps.**

    ****Best evidence recommendations:****

    **In this section, the EBP team takes into consideration all the above information related to the strength, quantity, and consistency of the synthesized findings at each level to generate best practice recommendations from the evidence. Consider:**

    **· What is the strength and quantity of studies related to a specific evidence recommendation?**

    **· Is there a sufficient number of high-strength studies to support one recommendation over another?**

    **· Are there any recommendations that can be ruled out based on the strength and quantity of the evidence?**

    **· Does the team feel the evidence is of sufficient strength and quantity to be considered a best evidence recommendation?**

    **Recommendations should be succinct statements that distill the synthesized evidence into an answer to the EBP question. The team bases these recommendations on the evidence and does not yet consider their specific setting. Translating the recommendations into action steps within the team’s organization occurs in the next step (Translation and Action Planning Tool, Appendix I).**

    ****Based on the synthesis, which statement represents the overall body of the evidence?****

    **Choose the statement that best reflects the strength and congruence of the findings. This determination will help the team to decide the next steps in the translation process**
    ****.****

    **When evidence is**
    **_strong_ (includes multiple high-quality studies of Level I and Level II evidence), compelling, and consistent, EBP teams can have greater confidence in best practice recommendations and should begin organizational translation**

    **When most of the evidence is**
    **_good_ (high-quality Level II and Level III)**
    **_and_ _consistent_ or**
    **_good_ _but_ _conflicting_, the team should proceed cautiously in making practice changes. In this instance, translation typically includes evaluating risk and careful consideration for organizational translation.**

    **The team makes practice changes primarily when evidence exists that is of high to good strength. Never make practice changes on**
    **_little to no evidence_ (low-quality evidence at any level or Level IV or Level V evidence alone). Nonetheless, teams have a variety of options for actions that include but are not limited to, creating awareness campaigns, conducting informational and educational updates, monitoring evidence sources for new information, and designing research studies.**

    **The exact quantity of sources needed to determine the strength of the evidence is subjective and depends on many factors, including the topic and the amount of available literature. The EBP team should discuss what they consider sufficient given their knowledge of the problem, literature, and setting**

    **© 2022 Johns Hopkins Health System/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing Page |**
    ****4****

    **## image1.jpeg**

    **## Week2Asignment8512.docx**

    appendix H: synthesis and recommendations tool

    "Synthesis is where you take multiple pieces of evidence or multiple sources and their ideas and you talk about the connections between those ideas or those sources. "

    – OASIS (2016, transcript para. 3)

    Evidence synthesis is defined as a step and method used to appraise and analyze data in systematic reviews. Evidence synthesis is critical to appraising and analyzing a review of your collected evidence in order to identify common themes, produce new insights, and identify conflicting evidence that might impact your project design.

    In NURS 8312, you completed Appendices E, F, and G. In this module, you will complete the Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document. You will also evaluate the overall strength of your evidence.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/modules/items/7765010)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the Learning Resources in this module. Pay particular attention to the evidence synthesis tutorial in the Walden Writing Center.

    · Download the
    [Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/files/15154743?wrap=1) [Download Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/files/15154743/download?download_frd=1).

    **The Assignment (Form)**

    Complete the Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document.

    **Remember Research Project Topic Please.**

    **Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Adults Patients with Anxiety Disorder. It’s a continuation please**

    **## AppendixH.docx**

    Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals

    Synthesis and Recommendations Tool

    Appendix H

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/appendix-h-synthesis-and-recommendations-tool)

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | EBP Question: |
    | **Strength** | **Number of Sources (Quantity)** | **Synthesized Findings With Article Number(s)**<br>(This is <br>_not_ a simple restating of information from each individual evidence summary—see directions) |
    | Level | Overall Quality Rating <br>(Strong, good, or low) | | |
    | **Level I**<br>· Experimental studies | | | |
    | **Level II**<br>· Quasi-experimental studies | | | |
    | **Level III**<br>· Nonexperimental, including qualitative studies | | | |
    | **Level IV**<br>· Clinical practice guidelines or consensus panels | | | |
    | **Level V**<br>· Literature reviews, QI, case reports, expert opinion | | | |

    | |
    | — |
    | **Where does the evidence show consistency?** |
    | |
    | **Where does the evidence show inconsistency?** |
    | |
    | **Best evidence recommendations (taking into consideration the quantity, consistency, and strength of the evidence):** |
    | |
    | **Based on your synthesis, select the statement that best describes the overall characteristics of the body of evidence.** |
    | ☐<br>**Strong & compelling evidence, consistent results** Recommendations are reliable; evaluate for organizational translation.<br> <br>☐<br>**Good evidence & consistent results** Recommendations may be reliable; evaluate for risk and organizational translation.<br> <br>☐<br>**Good evidence but conflicting results** Unable to establish best practice based on current evidence; evaluate risk, consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project.<br> <br>☐<br>**Little or no evidence** Unable to establish best practice based on current evidence; consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project. |

    **See Chapter 11, Lessons from Practice, for examples of completed tools.**

    ****Directions for use of the Synthesis and Recommendations Tool****

    ****Purpose**:**

    **This tool guides the EBP team through the process of synthesizing the pertinent findings from the Individual Evidence Summary (Appendix G), sorted by evidence level, to create an overall picture of the body of the evidence related to the PICO question. The synthesis process uses quantity, strength (level and quality), and consistency to generate the best evidence recommendations for potential translation.**

    ****Overall quality rating and the total number of sources:****

    **Record the overall quality rating and the number of sources for each level (strong, good, or low), ensuring agreement among the team members.**

    ****Synthesized findings:****

    **This section captures key findings that answer the EBP question. Using the questions below, generate a comprehensive synthesis by combining the different pieces of evidence in the form of succinct statements that enhance the team’s knowledge and generate new insights, perspectives, and understandings into a greater whole. The following questions can help guide the team’s discussion of the evidence:**

    **· How can the evidence in each of the levels be organized to produce a more comprehensive understanding of the big picture?**

    **· What themes do you notice?**

    **· What elements of the intervention/setting/sample seem to influence the outcome?**

    **· What are the important takeaways?**

    **Avoid repeating content and/or copying and pasting directly from the Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Record the article number(s) used to generate each synthesis statement to make the source of findings easy to identify.**

    **Using this synthesis tool requires not only the critical thinking of the whole team but also group discussion and consensus building. The team reviews the individual evidence summary of high- and good-quality articles, uses subjective and objective reasoning to look for salient themes, and evaluates information to create higher-level insights. They include and consider the strength and consistency of findings in their evaluation.**

    ****Where does the evidence show consistency/inconsistency?****

    **EBP teams must consider how consistent the results are across studies. Do the studies tend to show the same conclusions, or are there differences? The synthesized evidence is much more compelling when most studies have the same general results or point in the same general direction. The synthesized evidence is less compelling when the results from half the studies have one indication, while the findings from the other half point in a different direction. The team should identify the points of consistency among the evidence as well as areas where the inconsistency is apparent. Both factors are important to consider when developing recommendations or determining the next steps.**

    ****Best evidence recommendations:****

    **In this section, the EBP team takes into consideration all the above information related to the strength, quantity, and consistency of the synthesized findings at each level to generate best practice recommendations from the evidence. Consider:**

    **· What is the strength and quantity of studies related to a specific evidence recommendation?**

    **· Is there a sufficient number of high-strength studies to support one recommendation over another?**

    **· Are there any recommendations that can be ruled out based on the strength and quantity of the evidence?**

    **· Does the team feel the evidence is of sufficient strength and quantity to be considered a best evidence recommendation?**

    **Recommendations should be succinct statements that distill the synthesized evidence into an answer to the EBP question. The team bases these recommendations on the evidence and does not yet consider their specific setting. Translating the recommendations into action steps within the team’s organization occurs in the next step (Translation and Action Planning Tool, Appendix I).**

    ****Based on the synthesis, which statement represents the overall body of the evidence?****

    **Choose the statement that best reflects the strength and congruence of the findings. This determination will help the team to decide the next steps in the translation process**
    ****.****

    **When evidence is**
    **_strong_ (includes multiple high-quality studies of Level I and Level II evidence), compelling, and consistent, EBP teams can have greater confidence in best practice recommendations and should begin organizational translation**

    **When most of the evidence is**
    **_good_ (high-quality Level II and Level III)**
    **_and_ _consistent_ or**
    **_good_ _but_ _conflicting_, the team should proceed cautiously in making practice changes. In this instance, translation typically includes evaluating risk and careful consideration for organizational translation.**

    **The team makes practice changes primarily when evidence exists that is of high to good strength. Never make practice changes on**
    **_little to no evidence_ (low-quality evidence at any level or Level IV or Level V evidence alone). Nonetheless, teams have a variety of options for actions that include but are not limited to, creating awareness campaigns, conducting informational and educational updates, monitoring evidence sources for new information, and designing research studies.**

    **The exact quantity of sources needed to determine the strength of the evidence is subjective and depends on many factors, including the topic and the amount of available literature. The EBP team should discuss what they consider sufficient given their knowledge of the problem, literature, and setting**

    **© 2022 Johns Hopkins Health System/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing Page |**
    ****4****

    **## image1.jpeg**

    **## Week2Asignment8512.docx**

    appendix H: synthesis and recommendations tool

    "Synthesis is where you take multiple pieces of evidence or multiple sources and their ideas and you talk about the connections between those ideas or those sources. "

    – OASIS (2016, transcript para. 3)

    Evidence synthesis is defined as a step and method used to appraise and analyze data in systematic reviews. Evidence synthesis is critical to appraising and analyzing a review of your collected evidence in order to identify common themes, produce new insights, and identify conflicting evidence that might impact your project design.

    In NURS 8312, you completed Appendices E, F, and G. In this module, you will complete the Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document. You will also evaluate the overall strength of your evidence.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/modules/items/7765010)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the Learning Resources in this module. Pay particular attention to the evidence synthesis tutorial in the Walden Writing Center.

    · Download the
    [Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/files/15154743?wrap=1) [Download Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184583/files/15154743/download?download_frd=1).

    **The Assignment (Form)**

    Complete the Appendix H: Synthesis and Recommendations Tool document.

    **Remember Research Project Topic Please.**

    **Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Adults Patients with Anxiety Disorder. It’s a continuation please**

    **## AppendixH.docx**

    Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals

    Synthesis and Recommendations Tool

    Appendix H

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/appendix-h-synthesis-and-recommendations-tool)

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | EBP Question: |
    | **Strength** | **Number of Sources (Quantity)** | **Synthesized Findings With Article Number(s)**<br>(This is <br>_not_ a simple restating of information from each individual evidence summary—see directions) |
    | Level | Overall Quality Rating <br>(Strong, good, or low) | | |
    | **Level I**<br>· Experimental studies | | | |
    | **Level II**<br>· Quasi-experimental studies | | | |
    | **Level III**<br>· Nonexperimental, including qualitative studies | | | |
    | **Level IV**<br>· Clinical practice guidelines or consensus panels | | | |
    | **Level V**<br>· Literature reviews, QI, case reports, expert opinion | | | |

    | |
    | — |
    | **Where does the evidence show consistency?** |
    | |
    | **Where does the evidence show inconsistency?** |
    | |
    | **Best evidence recommendations (taking into consideration the quantity, consistency, and strength of the evidence):** |
    | |
    | **Based on your synthesis, select the statement that best describes the overall characteristics of the body of evidence.** |
    | ☐<br>**Strong & compelling evidence, consistent results** Recommendations are reliable; evaluate for organizational translation.<br> <br>☐<br>**Good evidence & consistent results** Recommendations may be reliable; evaluate for risk and organizational translation.<br> <br>☐<br>**Good evidence but conflicting results** Unable to establish best practice based on current evidence; evaluate risk, consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project.<br> <br>☐<br>**Little or no evidence** Unable to establish best practice based on current evidence; consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project. |

    **See Chapter 11, Lessons from Practice, for examples of completed tools.**

    ****Directions for use of the Synthesis and Recommendations Tool****

    ****Purpose**:**

    **This tool guides the EBP team through the process of synthesizing the pertinent findings from the Individual Evidence Summary (Appendix G), sorted by evidence level, to create an overall picture of the body of the evidence related to the PICO question. The synthesis process uses quantity, strength (level and quality), and consistency to generate the best evidence recommendations for potential translation.**

    ****Overall quality rating and the total number of sources:****

    **Record the overall quality rating and the number of sources for each level (strong, good, or low), ensuring agreement among the team members.**

    ****Synthesized findings:****

    **This section captures key findings that answer the EBP question. Using the questions below, generate a comprehensive synthesis by combining the different pieces of evidence in the form of succinct statements that enhance the team’s knowledge and generate new insights, perspectives, and understandings into a greater whole. The following questions can help guide the team’s discussion of the evidence:**

    **· How can the evidence in each of the levels be organized to produce a more comprehensive understanding of the big picture?**

    **· What themes do you notice?**

    **· What elements of the intervention/setting/sample seem to influence the outcome?**

    **· What are the important takeaways?**

    **Avoid repeating content and/or copying and pasting directly from the Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Record the article number(s) used to generate each synthesis statement to make the source of findings easy to identify.**

    **Using this synthesis tool requires not only the critical thinking of the whole team but also group discussion and consensus building. The team reviews the individual evidence summary of high- and good-quality articles, uses subjective and objective reasoning to look for salient themes, and evaluates information to create higher-level insights. They include and consider the strength and consistency of findings in their evaluation.**

    ****Where does the evidence show consistency/inconsistency?****

    **EBP teams must consider how consistent the results are across studies. Do the studies tend to show the same conclusions, or are there differences? The synthesized evidence is much more compelling when most studies have the same general results or point in the same general direction. The synthesized evidence is less compelling when the results from half the studies have one indication, while the findings from the other half point in a different direction. The team should identify the points of consistency among the evidence as well as areas where the inconsistency is apparent. Both factors are important to consider when developing recommendations or determining the next steps.**

    ****Best evidence recommendations:****

    **In this section, the EBP team takes into consideration all the above information related to the strength, quantity, and consistency of the synthesized findings at each level to generate best practice recommendations from the evidence. Consider:**

    **· What is the strength and quantity of studies related to a specific evidence recommendation?**

    **· Is there a sufficient number of high-strength studies to support one recommendation over another?**

    **· Are there any recommendations that can be ruled out based on the strength and quantity of the evidence?**

    **· Does the team feel the evidence is of sufficient strength and quantity to be considered a best evidence recommendation?**

    **Recommendations should be succinct statements that distill the synthesized evidence into an answer to the EBP question. The team bases these recommendations on the evidence and does not yet consider their specific setting. Translating the recommendations into action steps within the team’s organization occurs in the next step (Translation and Action Planning Tool, Appendix I).**

    ****Based on the synthesis, which statement represents the overall body of the evidence?****

    **Choose the statement that best reflects the strength and congruence of the findings. This determination will help the team to decide the next steps in the translation process**
    ****.****

    **When evidence is**
    **_strong_ (includes multiple high-quality studies of Level I and Level II evidence), compelling, and consistent, EBP teams can have greater confidence in best practice recommendations and should begin organizational translation**

    **When most of the evidence is**
    **_good_ (high-quality Level II and Level III)**
    **_and_ _consistent_ or**
    **_good_ _but_ _conflicting_, the team should proceed cautiously in making practice changes. In this instance, translation typically includes evaluating risk and careful consideration for organizational translation.**

    **The team makes practice changes primarily when evidence exists that is of high to good strength. Never make practice changes on**
    **_little to no evidence_ (low-quality evidence at any level or Level IV or Level V evidence alone). Nonetheless, teams have a variety of options for actions that include but are not limited to, creating awareness campaigns, conducting informational and educational updates, monitoring evidence sources for new information, and designing research studies.**

    **The exact quantity of sources needed to determine the strength of the evidence is subjective and depends on many factors, including the topic and the amount of available literature. The EBP team should discuss what they consider sufficient given their knowledge of the problem, literature, and setting**

    **© 2022 Johns Hopkins Health System/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing Page |**
    ****4****

    **## image1.jpeg**

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Use Rubric – ## HealthCareDeliveryModelsandNursingPractice.docx – Rubric.pdf **## HealthCareDeliveryModelsandNursingPractice.docx** **Health Care Delivery Models and Nursing Practice** Start Date Sep 1, 2025, 12:00 AM Due Date Sep 7, 2025, 11:59 PM Points 165 Rubric [View Rubric](https://halo.gcu.ed…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Use Rubric

    – ## HealthCareDeliveryModelsandNursingPractice.docx

    – Rubric.pdf

    **## HealthCareDeliveryModelsandNursingPractice.docx**

    **Health Care Delivery Models and Nursing Practice**

    Start Date

    Sep 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

    Due Date

    Sep 7, 2025, 11:59 PM

    Points

    165

    Rubric

    [View Rubric](https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/NRS-440VN-O500-20250825/rubrics/21a7f06f-d2b6-4ca7-8436-1be7bdc06853)

    Status

    Active

    Assessment Traits

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    Examine changes introduced to reform or restructure the U.S. health care delivery system. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss action taken for reform and restructuring and the role of the nurse within this changing environment.

    Include the following:

    1. Outline a current or emerging health care law or federal regulation introduced within the last 5 years to reform or restructure some aspect of the health care delivery system. Describe the effect of this on nursing practice and the nurse's role and responsibility.

    2. Discuss how quality measures and pay for performance affect patient outcomes. Explain how these affect nursing practice and describe the expectations and responsibilities of the nursing role in these situations.

    3. Discuss professional nursing leadership and management roles that have arisen and how they are important in responding to emerging trends and in the promotion of patient safety and quality care in diverse health care settings.

    4. Research emerging trends. Predict two ways in which the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform within the next five years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in health care.

    You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10390545)

    **Rubric.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10390545)

    **## HealthCareDeliveryModelsandNursingPractice.docx**

    **Health Care Delivery Models and Nursing Practice**

    Start Date

    Sep 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

    Due Date

    Sep 7, 2025, 11:59 PM

    Points

    165

    Rubric

    [View Rubric](https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/NRS-440VN-O500-20250825/rubrics/21a7f06f-d2b6-4ca7-8436-1be7bdc06853)

    Status

    Active

    Assessment Traits

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    Examine changes introduced to reform or restructure the U.S. health care delivery system. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss action taken for reform and restructuring and the role of the nurse within this changing environment.

    Include the following:

    1. Outline a current or emerging health care law or federal regulation introduced within the last 5 years to reform or restructure some aspect of the health care delivery system. Describe the effect of this on nursing practice and the nurse's role and responsibility.

    2. Discuss how quality measures and pay for performance affect patient outcomes. Explain how these affect nursing practice and describe the expectations and responsibilities of the nursing role in these situations.

    3. Discuss professional nursing leadership and management roles that have arisen and how they are important in responding to emerging trends and in the promotion of patient safety and quality care in diverse health care settings.

    4. Research emerging trends. Predict two ways in which the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform within the next five years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in health care.

    You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10390545)

    **## HealthCareDeliveryModelsandNursingPractice.docx**

    **Health Care Delivery Models and Nursing Practice**

    Start Date

    Sep 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

    Due Date

    Sep 7, 2025, 11:59 PM

    Points

    165

    Rubric

    [View Rubric](https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/NRS-440VN-O500-20250825/rubrics/21a7f06f-d2b6-4ca7-8436-1be7bdc06853)

    Status

    Active

    Assessment Traits

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    Examine changes introduced to reform or restructure the U.S. health care delivery system. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss action taken for reform and restructuring and the role of the nurse within this changing environment.

    Include the following:

    1. Outline a current or emerging health care law or federal regulation introduced within the last 5 years to reform or restructure some aspect of the health care delivery system. Describe the effect of this on nursing practice and the nurse's role and responsibility.

    2. Discuss how quality measures and pay for performance affect patient outcomes. Explain how these affect nursing practice and describe the expectations and responsibilities of the nursing role in these situations.

    3. Discuss professional nursing leadership and management roles that have arisen and how they are important in responding to emerging trends and in the promotion of patient safety and quality care in diverse health care settings.

    4. Research emerging trends. Predict two ways in which the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform within the next five years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in health care.

    You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10390545)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Describe requirements related to controlled substances.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Describe requirements related to controlled substances..

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing NUR 504 Module 2 Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Module 2 Assignment _**Comprehensive Mental Health Examination**_

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Module 2 Assignment
    _**Comprehensive Mental Health Examination**_

  • [Solved] PRACTICUM EXPERIENCE PLAN (PEP)- 6665

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Review your Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form you submitted last week and think about areas for which you would like to gain application-level experience and/or continued growth as an advanced practice nurse. How can your experiences in the practicum help you achieve these aims? – Review the in…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Review your Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form you submitted last week and think about areas for which you would like to gain application-level experience and/or continued growth as an advanced practice nurse. How can your experiences in the practicum help you achieve these aims?
    – Review the information related to developing objectives provided in this week’s Learning Resources. Your practicum learning objectives that you want to achieve during your practicum experience must be:
    – Specific
    – Measurable
    – Attainable
    – Results-focused
    – Time-bound
    – Reflective of the higher-order domains of Bloom’s taxonomy (i.e., application level and above)
    **Note:** Please make sure your objectives are individualized and outlined in your Practicum Experience Plan (PEP). While you may add previous objectives to continue to work toward. You must have 3 new objectives for each class, each quarter.
    – Discuss your professional aims and your proposed practicum objectives with your Preceptor to ascertain if the necessary resources are available at your practicum site.
    – Select one nursing theory and one counseling/psychotherapy theory to best guide your clinical practice. Explain why you selected these theories. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
    – Create a timeline of practicum activities that demonstrates how you plan to meet these goals and objectives based on your practicum requirements.
    ### **THE ASSIGNMENT**
    **Record** the required information in each area of the Practicum Experience Plan template, including three to four (3–4) **measurable** practicum Learning Objectives you will use to facilitate your learning during the practicum experience.
    \
    Practicum_Experience_Plan-2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicum-experience-plan-2-docx-10390575 "Practicum_Experience_Plan-2.docx")
    \
    PMHNPPRAC6645ClinicalSkills.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pmhnpprac6645clinicalskills-docx-10390577 "PMHNPPRAC6645ClinicalSkills.docx")