Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] NUR509W5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## NUR509W5.docx **## NUR509W5.docx** **DISCUSSION:** A 34-y.o. female presents with the complaint of a sudden excruciating pain in her back and points to her flank area on the right side. She rates the pain as 10 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the worst. She also complains of nausea with th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## NUR509W5.docx

    **## NUR509W5.docx**

    **DISCUSSION:**

    A 34-y.o. female presents with the complaint of a sudden excruciating pain in her back and points to her flank area on the right side. She rates the pain as 10 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the worst. She also complains of nausea with the pain. She states that she has never had anything like this before, and the pain is subsiding a little now.

    1. What additional questions should you ask the patient and why?

    2. What should be included in the physical examination at this visit?

    3. What are the possible differential diagnoses at this time?

    4. What tests should you order and why?

    5. How should this patient be managed?

    **INSTRUCTIONS:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    · Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs

    · Please write in paragraph form, no bullet points

    · Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    · Please ensure APA formatting is correct

    PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW FOR SCORE OF 10 POINTS

    ![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509w5)

    ## image1.png

    **## NUR509W5.docx**

    **DISCUSSION:**

    A 34-y.o. female presents with the complaint of a sudden excruciating pain in her back and points to her flank area on the right side. She rates the pain as 10 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the worst. She also complains of nausea with the pain. She states that she has never had anything like this before, and the pain is subsiding a little now.

    1. What additional questions should you ask the patient and why?

    2. What should be included in the physical examination at this visit?

    3. What are the possible differential diagnoses at this time?

    4. What tests should you order and why?

    5. How should this patient be managed?

    **INSTRUCTIONS:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    · Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs

    · Please write in paragraph form, no bullet points

    · Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    · Please ensure APA formatting is correct

    PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW FOR SCORE OF 10 POINTS

    ![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509w5)

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] NUR509CL5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## NUR509CLW5.docx **## NUR509CLW5.docx** **DISCUSSION:** Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 pos…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## NUR509CLW5.docx

    **## NUR509CLW5.docx**

    **DISCUSSION:**

    Describe your clinical experience for this week.

    · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?

    · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
    **(LEFT LEG PAIN)**

    · Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.

    · What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?

    · Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **INSTRUCTIONS:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    · Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs

    · Please write in paragraph form, no bullet points

    · Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    · Please ensure APA formatting is correct

    PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW FOR SCORE OF 10 POINTS

    ![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509cl5)

    ## image1.png

    **## NUR509CLW5.docx**

    **DISCUSSION:**

    Describe your clinical experience for this week.

    · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?

    · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
    **(LEFT LEG PAIN)**

    · Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.

    · What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?

    · Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **INSTRUCTIONS:**

    · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    · Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs

    · Please write in paragraph form, no bullet points

    · Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    · Please ensure APA formatting is correct

    PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW FOR SCORE OF 10 POINTS

    ![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509cl5)

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering management.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] WEEK 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has h…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
    In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
    Resources
    \
    MOD3ASSIGNMENT.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mod3assignment-docx-10406117 "MOD3ASSIGNMENT.docx")

  • [Solved] WK5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## WK5.docx **## WK5.docx** **ONE** To Prepare Select item 1, 2, or 3 to use for this Discussion. Consider the definitions, differences, and utility of the two terms listed under your item selection. Your response will need to include both terms in the selected item. Odds ratio and risk ratio Mort…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## WK5.docx

    **## WK5.docx**

    **ONE**

    To Prepare

    Select item 1, 2, or 3 to use for this Discussion. Consider the definitions, differences, and utility of the two terms listed under your item selection. Your response will need to include both terms in the selected item.

    Odds ratio and risk ratio

    Mortality and morbidity

    Incidence and prevalence

    Consider how these epidemiologic measures strengthen and support nursing practice.

    Assess practice limitations of not using these measures in nursing practice.

    Conduct additional research in the Walden Library and other credible resources and then locate two examples in the scholarly literature that support your insights.

    Discussion

    · Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

    · Explain how your selected measures of effect strengthen and support nursing practice. Provide at least two specific examples from the literature to substantiate your insights.

    · Assess limitations of not using measures of effect in nursing practice.

    Resources

    · Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024).
    _Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice_ (4th ed.). Springer.

    · Chapter 4, “Epidemiological Methods and Measurements in Population-Based Nursing Practice: Part I” (pp. 68-105)

    · Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021).
    _Epidemiology for public health practice_ (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

    · Chapter 3, “Measures of Morbidity and Mortality Used in Epidemiology”

    · Chapter 9, “Measures of Effect”

    **TWO**

    To prepare:

    Reflect on how different healthcare settings use quality scorecards and dashboards.

    Select any healthcare setting that has an established scorecard or dashboard measuring patient experience and quality improvement goals.

    Analyze a scorecard or dashboard from your selected organization

    Remember to keep the name of your selected organization anonymous.

    Reflect on how these measurement systems and measurement methods may impact organizational goal setting in the areas of overall performance and financial stability.

    Explore the key indicators involved with scorecards and dashboards, as well as the external quality standards to which they are compared.

    Reflect on what the metrics used in the balanced scorecards and dashboards might mean to your specific organization and/or nursing practice. Has your organization established targets for these or similar metrics and are they currently being met? Why or why not?

    Discussion

    · Provide a brief description of the selected healthcare organization and setting.

    · Summarize the quality and patient experience measures on the selected scorecard or dashboard.

    · Keep the name of your selected organization anonymous.

    · Describe how the selected healthcare organization establishes targets for their organizational improvement plan (e.g., internal or external benchmarking, quality databases).

    · Analyze the quality metrics and determine if the organization is meeting these metrics.

    · Include any potential impact to the organization for not meeting these metrics (e.g., value-based purchasing, CMS reimbursement and penalties).

    · Explain your evaluation

    Resources

    American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2024). The essential Links to an external site.. AACN. https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials

    Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

    Chapter 1, “Evidence-Based Practice: Context, Concerns, and Challenges” (pp. 3–10)

    Chapter 2, “Creating a Supportive EBP Environment” (pp. 13–37)

    Chapter 3, “The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice (JHEBP) Model for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Process Overview” (pp. 43–66)

    CMS.gov. (2023, September 6). HCAHPS: Patients’ perspectives of care survey Links to an external site.. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalHCAHPS

    Ransom, E. R., Joshi, M. S., Ransom, S. B., & Nash, D. B. (Eds.). (2023). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (5th ed.). Health Administration Press & Association of University Programs in Health Administration.

    Chapter 8, “Quality Measurement: Measuring What Matters Links to an external site.” (pp. 222–237)

    Chapter 9, “Value-Based Purchasing Links to an external site.” (pp. 240–267)

    Chapter 12, “Governance for Quality: Building a Culture of Quality and Safety Links to an external site.” (pp. 369–371)

    **## WK5.docx**

    **ONE**

    To Prepare

    Select item 1, 2, or 3 to use for this Discussion. Consider the definitions, differences, and utility of the two terms listed under your item selection. Your response will need to include both terms in the selected item.

    Odds ratio and risk ratio

    Mortality and morbidity

    Incidence and prevalence

    Consider how these epidemiologic measures strengthen and support nursing practice.

    Assess practice limitations of not using these measures in nursing practice.

    Conduct additional research in the Walden Library and other credible resources and then locate two examples in the scholarly literature that support your insights.

    Discussion

    · Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

    · Explain how your selected measures of effect strengthen and support nursing practice. Provide at least two specific examples from the literature to substantiate your insights.

    · Assess limitations of not using measures of effect in nursing practice.

    Resources

    · Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024).
    _Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice_ (4th ed.). Springer.

    · Chapter 4, “Epidemiological Methods and Measurements in Population-Based Nursing Practice: Part I” (pp. 68-105)

    · Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021).
    _Epidemiology for public health practice_ (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

    · Chapter 3, “Measures of Morbidity and Mortality Used in Epidemiology”

    · Chapter 9, “Measures of Effect”

    **TWO**

    To prepare:

    Reflect on how different healthcare settings use quality scorecards and dashboards.

    Select any healthcare setting that has an established scorecard or dashboard measuring patient experience and quality improvement goals.

    Analyze a scorecard or dashboard from your selected organization

    Remember to keep the name of your selected organization anonymous.

    Reflect on how these measurement systems and measurement methods may impact organizational goal setting in the areas of overall performance and financial stability.

    Explore the key indicators involved with scorecards and dashboards, as well as the external quality standards to which they are compared.

    Reflect on what the metrics used in the balanced scorecards and dashboards might mean to your specific organization and/or nursing practice. Has your organization established targets for these or similar metrics and are they currently being met? Why or why not?

    Discussion

    · Provide a brief description of the selected healthcare organization and setting.

    · Summarize the quality and patient experience measures on the selected scorecard or dashboard.

    · Keep the name of your selected organization anonymous.

    · Describe how the selected healthcare organization establishes targets for their organizational improvement plan (e.g., internal or external benchmarking, quality databases).

    · Analyze the quality metrics and determine if the organization is meeting these metrics.

    · Include any potential impact to the organization for not meeting these metrics (e.g., value-based purchasing, CMS reimbursement and penalties).

    · Explain your evaluation

    Resources

    American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2024). The essential Links to an external site.. AACN. https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials

    Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

    Chapter 1, “Evidence-Based Practice: Context, Concerns, and Challenges” (pp. 3–10)

    Chapter 2, “Creating a Supportive EBP Environment” (pp. 13–37)

    Chapter 3, “The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice (JHEBP) Model for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Process Overview” (pp. 43–66)

    CMS.gov. (2023, September 6). HCAHPS: Patients’ perspectives of care survey Links to an external site.. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalHCAHPS

    Ransom, E. R., Joshi, M. S., Ransom, S. B., & Nash, D. B. (Eds.). (2023). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (5th ed.). Health Administration Press & Association of University Programs in Health Administration.

    Chapter 8, “Quality Measurement: Measuring What Matters Links to an external site.” (pp. 222–237)

    Chapter 9, “Value-Based Purchasing Links to an external site.” (pp. 240–267)

    Chapter 12, “Governance for Quality: Building a Culture of Quality and Safety Links to an external site.” (pp. 369–371)

  • [Solved] Nursing Read the timeline of the Schiavo case at: https://bioethics.miami.edu/clinical-and-research-ethics/terri-schiavo-project/timeline-of-key-events/index.html Do some of your own independent homework on Terri Schiavo.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Read the timeline of the Schiavo case at: [https://bioethics.miami.edu/clinical-and-research-ethics/terri-schiavo-project/timeline-of-key-events/index.html](https://bioethics.miami.edu/clinical-and-research-ethics/terri-schiavo-project/timeline-of-key-events/index.html) 2. Do some of your own ind…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. Read the timeline of the Schiavo case at: [https://bioethics.miami.edu/clinical-and-research-ethics/terri-schiavo-project/timeline-of-key-events/index.html](https://bioethics.miami.edu/clinical-and-research-ethics/terri-schiavo-project/timeline-of-key-events/index.html)
    2. Do some of your own independent homework on Terri Schiavo. You must have at least five (5) sources cited in your homework.
    3. Analyze the research in order to determine who was ethically correct in your opinion; the husband or the parents.
    4. Write a persuasive research homework on your findings, thoughts, and opinions. Pick a side, and defend it.
    5. Your homework should be at least three (3) full pages, but no more than five (5) full pages. You should have two additional pages: one with your sources, and one as a cover page.

  • [Solved] Nursing nursing homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing nursing homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] C5-ASS4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## C5-ASS4.docx – cf_Exemplar_NURS-FPX4020_Assessment_41.pdf **## C5-ASS4.docx** **Assessment 4** **Improvement Plan Tool Kit** [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-instructions?module_item_id=2470419&content_id=885552) [Resources](https://coursero…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## C5-ASS4.docx

    – cf_Exemplar_NURS-FPX4020_Assessment_41.pdf

    **## C5-ASS4.docx**

    **Assessment 4**

    **Improvement Plan Tool Kit**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-instructions?module_item_id=2470419&content_id=885552) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-resources?module_item_id=2470451&content_id=885552) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/modules/items/2470457) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-attempts?module_item_id=2470469&content_id=885552&attempt_no=1)Attempt 2Attempt 3

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

    For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    Communication in the healthcare environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As healthcare organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical. Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote healthcare wellness at local and global levels (Kaminski, 2016).

    You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.

    **References**

    Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices.
    _AORN Journal, 102_(4), 329–342.

    Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors.
    _Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11_(4), 1–7.

    **Overview**

    Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices—sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an education or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees' new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use and resources are available to guide you.

    For this assessment, build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue and put the plan into action.

    **Preparation**

    Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or Google Docs login, or create an account following the directions under the "Create Account" menu. Visit
    [Wiki Resources](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=3333082830006731) for help.

    **Instructions**

    Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.

    It is recommended that you focus on the three or four most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative. For example, if your initiative concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.

    Following the recommended scheme, you would collect at least three resources on average for each of the four categories. ;Each resource listing should include the following:

    · An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.

    · A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.

    · A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative.

    · A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.

    Remember that you must make your site public so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources in the Wiki Resources above for more information.

    Here is an example entry:

    · Ko, S., Hsieh, M., & Huang, R. (2023). Human error analysis and modeling of medication-related adverse events in Taiwan using the human factors analysis and classification system regression.
    _Healthcare, 11_(14), 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142063

    · Nurses have a crucial responsibility in preventing medication errors. They should follow the "five rights of medication" to reduce the risk of such errors. These include the "right patient," "right medication," "right time," "right dose," and "right documentation." By understanding these rights, nurses can manage medication administration effectively and ensure patient safety.

    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Example Assessment**: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.

    ·
    [Assessment 4 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/files/8790956/download).

    To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.

    **Example Google Site**: You may use the example Google Site found in
    [Assessment 4: Improved Heparin Infusion Safety](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=4040374690006731) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like for this assessment but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**.

    **Note:** If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Number of resources:** Your tool kit must include at least 12 professional or academically relevant resources that support the continued learning and implementation of knowledge and processes related to a safety improvement initiative. See the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed.

    ·
    **APA format:** Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations and each annotated resource. See the
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    · Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    · Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Identifies necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue. Organizes resources logically for ease of use.

    **Proficient**

    Identifies necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Basic**

    Identifies resources, but the necessity or support for the safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements, providing specific examples of utility within the context of a specific healthcare setting.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Basic**

    Summarizes but does not analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality, identifying the most valuable resources.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    **Basic**

    Describes resources that may not be relevant to patient safety risk or quality improvement.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.**

    **Distinguished**

    Uses persuasive, engaging language to present compelling reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Proficient**

    Presents reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Basic**

    Presents reasons and situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience that are not compelling or relevant.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.**

    **Distinguished**

    Communicates online resource tool kit using Google Sites in a clear and organized structure and professional manner that applies nearly flawless, current APA style and formatting throughout.

    **Proficient**

    Communicates resource tool kit in a Word doc or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Basic**

    Communicates online resource kit using a Word Doc or Google Sites in an unclear and disorganized structure and unprofessional manner that minimally follows APA style and formatting.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, or professional manner or partially follow APA style and formatting.

    **cf_Exemplar_NURS-FPX4020_Assessment_41.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-exemplar-nurs-fpx4020-assessment-41-pdf-10405749)

    **cf_Exemplar_NURS-FPX4020_Assessment_41.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-exemplar-nurs-fpx4020-assessment-41-pdf-10405749)

    **## C5-ASS4.docx**

    **Assessment 4**

    **Improvement Plan Tool Kit**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-instructions?module_item_id=2470419&content_id=885552) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-resources?module_item_id=2470451&content_id=885552) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/modules/items/2470457) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-attempts?module_item_id=2470469&content_id=885552&attempt_no=1)Attempt 2Attempt 3

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

    For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    Communication in the healthcare environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As healthcare organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical. Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote healthcare wellness at local and global levels (Kaminski, 2016).

    You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.

    **References**

    Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices.
    _AORN Journal, 102_(4), 329–342.

    Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors.
    _Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11_(4), 1–7.

    **Overview**

    Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices—sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an education or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees' new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use and resources are available to guide you.

    For this assessment, build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue and put the plan into action.

    **Preparation**

    Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or Google Docs login, or create an account following the directions under the "Create Account" menu. Visit
    [Wiki Resources](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=3333082830006731) for help.

    **Instructions**

    Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.

    It is recommended that you focus on the three or four most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative. For example, if your initiative concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.

    Following the recommended scheme, you would collect at least three resources on average for each of the four categories. ;Each resource listing should include the following:

    · An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.

    · A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.

    · A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative.

    · A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.

    Remember that you must make your site public so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources in the Wiki Resources above for more information.

    Here is an example entry:

    · Ko, S., Hsieh, M., & Huang, R. (2023). Human error analysis and modeling of medication-related adverse events in Taiwan using the human factors analysis and classification system regression.
    _Healthcare, 11_(14), 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142063

    · Nurses have a crucial responsibility in preventing medication errors. They should follow the "five rights of medication" to reduce the risk of such errors. These include the "right patient," "right medication," "right time," "right dose," and "right documentation." By understanding these rights, nurses can manage medication administration effectively and ensure patient safety.

    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Example Assessment**: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.

    ·
    [Assessment 4 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/files/8790956/download).

    To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.

    **Example Google Site**: You may use the example Google Site found in
    [Assessment 4: Improved Heparin Infusion Safety](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=4040374690006731) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like for this assessment but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**.

    **Note:** If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Number of resources:** Your tool kit must include at least 12 professional or academically relevant resources that support the continued learning and implementation of knowledge and processes related to a safety improvement initiative. See the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed.

    ·
    **APA format:** Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations and each annotated resource. See the
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    · Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    · Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Identifies necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue. Organizes resources logically for ease of use.

    **Proficient**

    Identifies necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Basic**

    Identifies resources, but the necessity or support for the safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements, providing specific examples of utility within the context of a specific healthcare setting.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Basic**

    Summarizes but does not analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality, identifying the most valuable resources.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    **Basic**

    Describes resources that may not be relevant to patient safety risk or quality improvement.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.**

    **Distinguished**

    Uses persuasive, engaging language to present compelling reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Proficient**

    Presents reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Basic**

    Presents reasons and situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience that are not compelling or relevant.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.**

    **Distinguished**

    Communicates online resource tool kit using Google Sites in a clear and organized structure and professional manner that applies nearly flawless, current APA style and formatting throughout.

    **Proficient**

    Communicates resource tool kit in a Word doc or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Basic**

    Communicates online resource kit using a Word Doc or Google Sites in an unclear and disorganized structure and unprofessional manner that minimally follows APA style and formatting.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, or professional manner or partially follow APA style and formatting.

    **cf_Exemplar_NURS-FPX4020_Assessment_41.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-exemplar-nurs-fpx4020-assessment-41-pdf-10405749)

    **## C5-ASS4.docx**

    **Assessment 4**

    **Improvement Plan Tool Kit**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-instructions?module_item_id=2470419&content_id=885552) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-resources?module_item_id=2470451&content_id=885552) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/modules/items/2470457) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-4-attempts?module_item_id=2470469&content_id=885552&attempt_no=1)Attempt 2Attempt 3

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

    For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    Communication in the healthcare environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As healthcare organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical. Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote healthcare wellness at local and global levels (Kaminski, 2016).

    You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.

    **References**

    Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices.
    _AORN Journal, 102_(4), 329–342.

    Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors.
    _Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11_(4), 1–7.

    **Overview**

    Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices—sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an education or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees' new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use and resources are available to guide you.

    For this assessment, build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue and put the plan into action.

    **Preparation**

    Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or Google Docs login, or create an account following the directions under the "Create Account" menu. Visit
    [Wiki Resources](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=3333082830006731) for help.

    **Instructions**

    Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.

    It is recommended that you focus on the three or four most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative. For example, if your initiative concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.

    Following the recommended scheme, you would collect at least three resources on average for each of the four categories. ;Each resource listing should include the following:

    · An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.

    · A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.

    · A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative.

    · A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.

    Remember that you must make your site public so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources in the Wiki Resources above for more information.

    Here is an example entry:

    · Ko, S., Hsieh, M., & Huang, R. (2023). Human error analysis and modeling of medication-related adverse events in Taiwan using the human factors analysis and classification system regression.
    _Healthcare, 11_(14), 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142063

    · Nurses have a crucial responsibility in preventing medication errors. They should follow the "five rights of medication" to reduce the risk of such errors. These include the "right patient," "right medication," "right time," "right dose," and "right documentation." By understanding these rights, nurses can manage medication administration effectively and ensure patient safety.

    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Example Assessment**: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.

    ·
    [Assessment 4 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/files/8790956/download).

    To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.

    **Example Google Site**: You may use the example Google Site found in
    [Assessment 4: Improved Heparin Infusion Safety](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=4040374690006731) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like for this assessment but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**.

    **Note:** If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Number of resources:** Your tool kit must include at least 12 professional or academically relevant resources that support the continued learning and implementation of knowledge and processes related to a safety improvement initiative. See the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed.

    ·
    **APA format:** Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations and each annotated resource. See the
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    · Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    · Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Identifies necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue. Organizes resources logically for ease of use.

    **Proficient**

    Identifies necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Basic**

    Identifies resources, but the necessity or support for the safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements, providing specific examples of utility within the context of a specific healthcare setting.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Basic**

    Summarizes but does not analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality, identifying the most valuable resources.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    **Basic**

    Describes resources that may not be relevant to patient safety risk or quality improvement.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.**

    **Distinguished**

    Uses persuasive, engaging language to present compelling reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Proficient**

    Presents reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Basic**

    Presents reasons and situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience that are not compelling or relevant.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.**

    **Distinguished**

    Communicates online resource tool kit using Google Sites in a clear and organized structure and professional manner that applies nearly flawless, current APA style and formatting throughout.

    **Proficient**

    Communicates resource tool kit in a Word doc or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Basic**

    Communicates online resource kit using a Word Doc or Google Sites in an unclear and disorganized structure and unprofessional manner that minimally follows APA style and formatting.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, or professional manner or partially follow APA style and formatting.

    **cf_Exemplar_NURS-FPX4020_Assessment_41.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-exemplar-nurs-fpx4020-assessment-41-pdf-10405749)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] 314Topic 2 DQ 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Select one area of health policy and describe the impact that policy formation places on direct patient care delivery. What component of the policy area you selected could be improved to provide better care or patient outcomes, and how?

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Select one area of health policy and describe the impact that policy formation places on direct patient care delivery. What component of the policy area you selected could be improved to provide better care or patient outcomes, and how?

  • [Solved] Week # 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please use ERAS – ## Spring2022DNP7600-W3-Template..docx – Monahan1.PDF – Spring20227600-Week3updatedrubric.docx – Minnich_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf – Swider_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf **## Spring2022DNP7600-W3-Template..docx** 1 Running head: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE I…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please use ERAS

    – ## Spring2022DNP7600-W3-Template..docx

    – Monahan1.PDF
    – Spring20227600-Week3updatedrubric.docx
    – Minnich_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf
    – Swider_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf

    **## Spring2022DNP7600-W3-Template..docx**

    1

    Running head: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSIGNMENT

    1

    EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSIGNMENT

    **Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Assignment**

    Student Name

    Miami Regional University

    DNP 7600: Population Based Health and Health Care Health Disparities

    Professor Name

    Month, Year

    _NOTE: No abstract_

    _NOTE: This is a template and guide. Delete all highlighted materials_

    **Header Here for the Title**

    (Introduction – not labeled ‘Introduction’) Introduce the purpose of your paper.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Primary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized the primary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of primary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Secondary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized a secondary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of secondary prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Tertiary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized the tertiary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of the tertiary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **How do the Findings Relate with Healthy People 2020 Objectives & DNP Essentials**

    This section relates the findings from the literature of each level of prevention to Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives and DNP essentials.

    **Summary**

    Identify the main ideas and significant conclusions from the body of your manuscript. Do not add new information in conclusion.

    **References**

    **Monahan1.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/monahan1-pdf)

    **Spring20227600-Week3updatedrubric.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/spring20227600-week3updatedrubric-docx)

    **Minnich_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/minnich-et-al-2017-public-health-nursing1-pdf)

    **Swider_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/swider-et-al-2017-public-health-nursing1-pdf)

    **Swider_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/swider-et-al-2017-public-health-nursing1-pdf)

    **## Spring2022DNP7600-W3-Template..docx**

    1

    Running head: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSIGNMENT

    1

    EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSIGNMENT

    **Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Assignment**

    Student Name

    Miami Regional University

    DNP 7600: Population Based Health and Health Care Health Disparities

    Professor Name

    Month, Year

    _NOTE: No abstract_

    _NOTE: This is a template and guide. Delete all highlighted materials_

    **Header Here for the Title**

    (Introduction – not labeled ‘Introduction’) Introduce the purpose of your paper.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Primary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized the primary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of primary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Secondary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized a secondary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of secondary prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Tertiary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized the tertiary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of the tertiary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **How do the Findings Relate with Healthy People 2020 Objectives & DNP Essentials**

    This section relates the findings from the literature of each level of prevention to Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives and DNP essentials.

    **Summary**

    Identify the main ideas and significant conclusions from the body of your manuscript. Do not add new information in conclusion.

    **References**

    **Monahan1.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/monahan1-pdf)

    **Spring20227600-Week3updatedrubric.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/spring20227600-week3updatedrubric-docx)

    **Minnich_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/minnich-et-al-2017-public-health-nursing1-pdf)

    **Swider_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/swider-et-al-2017-public-health-nursing1-pdf)

    **## Spring2022DNP7600-W3-Template..docx**

    1

    Running head: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSIGNMENT

    1

    EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSIGNMENT

    **Evidence-Based Practice in Public Health Assignment**

    Student Name

    Miami Regional University

    DNP 7600: Population Based Health and Health Care Health Disparities

    Professor Name

    Month, Year

    _NOTE: No abstract_

    _NOTE: This is a template and guide. Delete all highlighted materials_

    **Header Here for the Title**

    (Introduction – not labeled ‘Introduction’) Introduce the purpose of your paper.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Primary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized the primary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of primary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Secondary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized a secondary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of secondary prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **Description of a Scholarly Article Encompassing a Tertiary Level of Prevention**

    This section describes evidence-based project/research that utilized the tertiary level of prevention. The student includes the definition of the tertiary level of prevention, targeted population, intervention, and outcome.

    **How do the Findings Relate with Healthy People 2020 Objectives & DNP Essentials**

    This section relates the findings from the literature of each level of prevention to Healthy People 2020 Goals and objectives and DNP essentials.

    **Summary**

    Identify the main ideas and significant conclusions from the body of your manuscript. Do not add new information in conclusion.

    **References**

    **Monahan1.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/monahan1-pdf)

    **Spring20227600-Week3updatedrubric.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/spring20227600-week3updatedrubric-docx)

    **Minnich_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/minnich-et-al-2017-public-health-nursing1-pdf)

    **Swider_et_al-2017-Public_Health_Nursing1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/swider-et-al-2017-public-health-nursing1-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5