Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] PM2 D4R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering PM2 D4R.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] mod 5 CL

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering mod 5 CL.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1: IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## late1.docx – ## wk2lateRubric.docx – Understanding_quantitative_res.pdf – EBSCO-FullText-09_01_2025.pdf **## late1.docx** EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1: IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”? When you first went to work for y…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## late1.docx

    – ## wk2lateRubric.docx

    – Understanding_quantitative_res.pdf
    – EBSCO-FullText-09_01_2025.pdf

    **## late1.docx**

    EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1: IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

    Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

    When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

    Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

    Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

    In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/182069/modules/items/7502839)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.

    · Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

    · Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

    · Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    **Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies**

    After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

    · The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

    · A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

    · A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

    · A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

    · A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    **## wk2lateRubric.docx**

    Rubric

    **NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach. | **90 to >80.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**80 to >71.0 ptsGood** The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**71 to >62.0 ptsFair** The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**62 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing. …The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing. | 90 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **Understanding_quantitative_res.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/understanding-quantitative-res-pdf-10401243)

    **EBSCO-FullText-09_01_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-09-01-2025-pdf-10401245)

    **EBSCO-FullText-09_01_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-09-01-2025-pdf-10401245)

    **## late1.docx**

    EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1: IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

    Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

    When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

    Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

    Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

    In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/182069/modules/items/7502839)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.

    · Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

    · Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

    · Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    **Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies**

    After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

    · The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

    · A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

    · A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

    · A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

    · A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    **## wk2lateRubric.docx**

    Rubric

    **NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach. | **90 to >80.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**80 to >71.0 ptsGood** The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**71 to >62.0 ptsFair** The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**62 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing. …The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing. | 90 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **Understanding_quantitative_res.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/understanding-quantitative-res-pdf-10401243)

    **EBSCO-FullText-09_01_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-09-01-2025-pdf-10401245)

    **## late1.docx**

    EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1: IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

    Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

    When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

    Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

    Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

    In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/182069/modules/items/7502839)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.

    · Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

    · Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

    · Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    **Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies**

    After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

    · The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

    · A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

    · A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

    · A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

    · A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    **## wk2lateRubric.docx**

    Rubric

    **NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach. | **90 to >80.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**80 to >71.0 ptsGood** The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**71 to >62.0 ptsFair** The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.<br> <br>**62 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing. …The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing. | 90 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **Understanding_quantitative_res.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/understanding-quantitative-res-pdf-10401243)

    **EBSCO-FullText-09_01_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-09-01-2025-pdf-10401245)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4

  • [Solved] Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion Post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Environmental and Occupational Health Sept 16

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## EnvironmentalandOccupationalHealth.docx – ## Paper1Firsthalfofentirepaper.docx – ## ResearchTermProject-Parts1and2PowerPointandSpeechRecording.docx **## EnvironmentalandOccupationalHealth.docx** **Assignment** Submit your environmental health "Paper Topic" in this discussion board. Argue the si…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## EnvironmentalandOccupationalHealth.docx

    – ## Paper1Firsthalfofentirepaper.docx

    – ## ResearchTermProject-Parts1and2PowerPointandSpeechRecording.docx

    **## EnvironmentalandOccupationalHealth.docx**

    **Assignment**

    Submit your environmental health "Paper Topic" in this discussion board. Argue the significance of this issue in improving the health of the public. Each topic should be supported by two peer-reviewed articles (300 words; APA citations required).

    This maps to LO1, LO3, LO6, LO8

    **## Paper1Firsthalfofentirepaper.docx**

    **Paper 1 (First half of entire paper)**

    **I. Introduction**

    Length = 1 page

    1. Opening Statement: The opening sentence should include the significance of the issue explored in the paper. Describe the impact of the issue on the health of the population.

    2. Transition Sentences: Explore the impact of social, behavioral, and environmental factors on the health of the population. Describe the prevalence and incidence rates of the health problem in the community.

    3. Purpose Statement: The purpose statement should explore the significance of resolving the issue. Describe measures that can reduce the impact of this issue on the residents. Briefly describe a program that successfully mitigated the problem in your community.

    The introduction should be brief, interesting, and motivate audiences to read the paper further. You must use citations throughout, as needed. Use sources from government or institutional websites to support the introductory paragraph. Some examples are listed below:

    ·        United Nations:
    [https://www.un.org/en/](https://www.un.org/en/)

    ·        World Health Organization:
    [https://www.who.int/](https://www.who.int/)

    **II.  Literature Review (include your two other literature review articles)**

    **Length** **= 5/6 (1 page review per study = 5 pages)**

    The literature review provides a framework for establishing the significance of your research topic (Creswell, 2014). For this research paper, you will select 5 studies from peer-reviewed journals. The literature review should include the following components:

    1.
    **Introduction:** The opening sentence should isolate the research problem. Then, explain why it is necessary to solve the problem. Include names of databases used to conduct the research. List search terms used to find the research articles.

    2.
    **Review of the literature:** All study components should be described in detail –
    _study purpose_,
    _methods-characteristics of the participants (gender and ethnicity), number of participants, participant recruitment, data collection methods, study design, key findings/results, and recommendations._

    3.
    **Analysis of the literature:** Analyze what you have learned about the research problem through the research summarized in the Review of the Literature. Present similarities and differences in methodologies, findings, and recommendations

    **## ResearchTermProject-Parts1and2PowerPointandSpeechRecording.docx**

    ## PH640 Research Paper Guidelines

    You are a Region or Country Director for a Non-Profit organization in the US. In 11-13 pages, you will identify a major environmental health problem afflicting your region/country and propose an innovative solution (a health education intervention or health administration change). The final paper should include following components:

    **Abstract**

    Briefly describe major components of the research paper. The abstract should include high-level information from the following parts of your completed paper:
    _introduction, literature review, proven program, proposed program, recommendations, and conclusion_. You must include at least three key words are required.

    _Abstract should immediately follow the title page, but written after completion of paper and submitted with paper 2_

    Word limit: 250

    **Paper 1 (First half of entire paper)**

    I.
    **Introduction**

    **Length = 1 page**

    a.
    **Opening Statement:** The opening sentence should include the significance of the issue explored in the paper. Describe the impact of the issue on the health of the population.

    b.
    **Transition Sentences:** Explore the impact of social, behavior and environmental factors on the health of the population. Describe prevalence and incidence rates of the health problem in the community.

    c.
    **Purpose Statement:** The purpose statement should explore the significance of resolving the issue. Describe measures that can reduce the impact of this issue on the residents. Brifely describe a program that successfully mitigated the problem in your community.

    The introduction should be brief, interesting and motivate audiences to read the paper further. You must use citations throughout, as needed. Use sources from government or intitutional websites to support the introductory paragraph. Some examples are listed below:

    · United Nations:
    [https://www.un.org/en/](https://www.un.org/en/)

    · World Health Organization:
    [https://www.who.int/](https://www.who.int/)

    II.
    **Literature Review**

    **Length** **= 5/6 (1 page review per study = 5 pages)**

    The literature review provides a framework for establishing the significance of your research topic (Creswell, 2014). For this research paper, you will select 5 studies from peer-reviewed journals. The literature review should include the following components:

    1.
    **Introduction:** The opening sentence should isolate the research problem. Then, explain why it is necessary to solve the problem. Include names of databases used to conduct the research. List search terms used to find the research articles.

    2.
    **Review of the literature:** All study components should be described in detail –
    _study purpose_,
    _methods-characterstics of the participants (gender and ethnicity), number of participants, participant recruitment, data collection methods, study design, key findings/results and recommendations._

    3.
    **Analysis of the literature:** Analyze what you have learned about the research problem through the research summarized in the Review of the Literature. Present similarities and differences in methodologies, findings and recommendations

    ### Paper 2 (second half of entire paper)

    III.
    **Proven Program from the Literature**

    **Length = 1 page**

    Describe a program that was implemented successfully in your region/country. Explain how the program was successful in addressing the selected global health problem. Program components should be described in detail.

    **Sample program:** The WASH program – UN is an example of a successful global public health program aimed at providing access to clean water, sanitation, and handwashing facilties focused on promoting health among underpriviliged residents living in impoverished communities.

    Please click on this link for detail (
    [https://www.unicef.org/wash/](https://www.unicef.org/wash/))

    IV.
    **Proposed Program**

    **Length = 3 pages (1 page per objective/description)**

    Create an innovative program aimed at successfully alleviating the selected health problem. Use componets of your proven program and literature to solve the problem.

    Your proposed program should include 1 goal and at least 3 SMART objectives. A SMART objective is one that is Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-Bound.

    Use the SMART guide to create objectives for your program.

    **_Sample SMART Objective:_**

    _By the year two of the project, the Division of Cancer will have trained 75% of elementary schools in district 1, 3, and 6 on the selected scientifically based sun safety health education curriculum._

    V.
    **Recommendation**

    **Length = 1 page**

    This is your opportunity to propose innovative solutions aimed at mitigating the health problem. The recommendations should be evidence-based and practical. The solutions should be derived from literature and proven policies/program.

    VI.
    **Conclusion**

    **Length = 1 page**

    This section should highlight the major components of the paper:

    1. Lit review

    2. Proven program

    3. Proposed progam

    4. Recommendations

    Follow APA7 Guidelines (
    [www.owl.english.purdue.edu](http://www.owl.english.purdue.edu/) and
    [www.apastyle.org](http://www.apastyle.org/)). Proper in-text citaion and a reference list are required. Seek help from the writing specialist at the Graduate Research Center. Monroe College Library data bases and open access journals should be utilized to conduct a comprehensive literature review and develop an evidence based program.

    ## Presentation PowerPoint Instructions

    · With the information you gathered for your Research Paper, you will now create an intriguing visual presentation and present it to the class.

    · Presentation should include 10 slides-Background (1 slide), literature review (1 slide), program goal and objectives (1 slide), Program (5 slides), recommendation (1 slide) and conclusion (1 slide).

    · Your presentation should be between 5-7 minutes long; practice it several times beforehand!

    ## Presentation Recording Instructions

    Students will recording their oral presentation on the information from the PowerPoint (no reading from the slides). This is their opportunity to professionally share their findings and information, orally.

    6

    **## ResearchTermProject-Parts1and2PowerPointandSpeechRecording.docx**

    ## PH640 Research Paper Guidelines

    You are a Region or Country Director for a Non-Profit organization in the US. In 11-13 pages, you will identify a major environmental health problem afflicting your region/country and propose an innovative solution (a health education intervention or health administration change). The final paper should include following components:

    **Abstract**

    Briefly describe major components of the research paper. The abstract should include high-level information from the following parts of your completed paper:
    _introduction, literature review, proven program, proposed program, recommendations, and conclusion_. You must include at least three key words are required.

    _Abstract should immediately follow the title page, but written after completion of paper and submitted with paper 2_

    Word limit: 250

    **Paper 1 (First half of entire paper)**

    I.
    **Introduction**

    **Length = 1 page**

    a.
    **Opening Statement:** The opening sentence should include the significance of the issue explored in the paper. Describe the impact of the issue on the health of the population.

    b.
    **Transition Sentences:** Explore the impact of social, behavior and environmental factors on the health of the population. Describe prevalence and incidence rates of the health problem in the community.

    c.
    **Purpose Statement:** The purpose statement should explore the significance of resolving the issue. Describe measures that can reduce the impact of this issue on the residents. Brifely describe a program that successfully mitigated the problem in your community.

    The introduction should be brief, interesting and motivate audiences to read the paper further. You must use citations throughout, as needed. Use sources from government or intitutional websites to support the introductory paragraph. Some examples are listed below:

    · United Nations:
    [https://www.un.org/en/](https://www.un.org/en/)

    · World Health Organization:
    [https://www.who.int/](https://www.who.int/)

    II.
    **Literature Review**

    **Length** **= 5/6 (1 page review per study = 5 pages)**

    The literature review provides a framework for establishing the significance of your research topic (Creswell, 2014). For this research paper, you will select 5 studies from peer-reviewed journals. The literature review should include the following components:

    1.
    **Introduction:** The opening sentence should isolate the research problem. Then, explain why it is necessary to solve the problem. Include names of databases used to conduct the research. List search terms used to find the research articles.

    2.
    **Review of the literature:** All study components should be described in detail –
    _study purpose_,
    _methods-characterstics of the participants (gender and ethnicity), number of participants, participant recruitment, data collection methods, study design, key findings/results and recommendations._

    3.
    **Analysis of the literature:** Analyze what you have learned about the research problem through the research summarized in the Review of the Literature. Present similarities and differences in methodologies, findings and recommendations

    ### Paper 2 (second half of entire paper)

    III.
    **Proven Program from the Literature**

    **Length = 1 page**

    Describe a program that was implemented successfully in your region/country. Explain how the program was successful in addressing the selected global health problem. Program components should be described in detail.

    **Sample program:** The WASH program – UN is an example of a successful global public health program aimed at providing access to clean water, sanitation, and handwashing facilties focused on promoting health among underpriviliged residents living in impoverished communities.

    Please click on this link for detail (
    [https://www.unicef.org/wash/](https://www.unicef.org/wash/))

    IV.
    **Proposed Program**

    **Length = 3 pages (1 page per objective/description)**

    Create an innovative program aimed at successfully alleviating the selected health problem. Use componets of your proven program and literature to solve the problem.

    Your proposed program should include 1 goal and at least 3 SMART objectives. A SMART objective is one that is Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-Bound.

    Use the SMART guide to create objectives for your program.

    **_Sample SMART Objective:_**

    _By the year two of the project, the Division of Cancer will have trained 75% of elementary schools in district 1, 3, and 6 on the selected scientifically based sun safety health education curriculum._

    V.
    **Recommendation**

    **Length = 1 page**

    This is your opportunity to propose innovative solutions aimed at mitigating the health problem. The recommendations should be evidence-based and practical. The solutions should be derived from literature and proven policies/program.

    VI.
    **Conclusion**

    **Length = 1 page**

    This section should highlight the major components of the paper:

    1. Lit review

    2. Proven program

    3. Proposed progam

    4. Recommendations

    Follow APA7 Guidelines (
    [www.owl.english.purdue.edu](http://www.owl.english.purdue.edu/) and
    [www.apastyle.org](http://www.apastyle.org/)). Proper in-text citaion and a reference list are required. Seek help from the writing specialist at the Graduate Research Center. Monroe College Library data bases and open access journals should be utilized to conduct a comprehensive literature review and develop an evidence based program.

    ## Presentation PowerPoint Instructions

    · With the information you gathered for your Research Paper, you will now create an intriguing visual presentation and present it to the class.

    · Presentation should include 10 slides-Background (1 slide), literature review (1 slide), program goal and objectives (1 slide), Program (5 slides), recommendation (1 slide) and conclusion (1 slide).

    · Your presentation should be between 5-7 minutes long; practice it several times beforehand!

    ## Presentation Recording Instructions

    Students will recording their oral presentation on the information from the PowerPoint (no reading from the slides). This is their opportunity to professionally share their findings and information, orally.

    6

    **## EnvironmentalandOccupationalHealth.docx**

    **Assignment**

    Submit your environmental health "Paper Topic" in this discussion board. Argue the significance of this issue in improving the health of the public. Each topic should be supported by two peer-reviewed articles (300 words; APA citations required).

    This maps to LO1, LO3, LO6, LO8

    **## Paper1Firsthalfofentirepaper.docx**

    **Paper 1 (First half of entire paper)**

    **I. Introduction**

    Length = 1 page

    1. Opening Statement: The opening sentence should include the significance of the issue explored in the paper. Describe the impact of the issue on the health of the population.

    2. Transition Sentences: Explore the impact of social, behavioral, and environmental factors on the health of the population. Describe the prevalence and incidence rates of the health problem in the community.

    3. Purpose Statement: The purpose statement should explore the significance of resolving the issue. Describe measures that can reduce the impact of this issue on the residents. Briefly describe a program that successfully mitigated the problem in your community.

    The introduction should be brief, interesting, and motivate audiences to read the paper further. You must use citations throughout, as needed. Use sources from government or institutional websites to support the introductory paragraph. Some examples are listed below:

    ·        United Nations:
    [https://www.un.org/en/](https://www.un.org/en/)

    ·        World Health Organization:
    [https://www.who.int/](https://www.who.int/)

    **II.  Literature Review (include your two other literature review articles)**

    **Length** **= 5/6 (1 page review per study = 5 pages)**

    The literature review provides a framework for establishing the significance of your research topic (Creswell, 2014). For this research paper, you will select 5 studies from peer-reviewed journals. The literature review should include the following components:

    1.
    **Introduction:** The opening sentence should isolate the research problem. Then, explain why it is necessary to solve the problem. Include names of databases used to conduct the research. List search terms used to find the research articles.

    2.
    **Review of the literature:** All study components should be described in detail –
    _study purpose_,
    _methods-characteristics of the participants (gender and ethnicity), number of participants, participant recruitment, data collection methods, study design, key findings/results, and recommendations._

    3.
    **Analysis of the literature:** Analyze what you have learned about the research problem through the research summarized in the Review of the Literature. Present similarities and differences in methodologies, findings, and recommendations

    **## ResearchTermProject-Parts1and2PowerPointandSpeechRecording.docx**

    ## PH640 Research Paper Guidelines

    You are a Region or Country Director for a Non-Profit organization in the US. In 11-13 pages, you will identify a major environmental health problem afflicting your region/country and propose an innovative solution (a health education intervention or health administration change). The final paper should include following components:

    **Abstract**

    Briefly describe major components of the research paper. The abstract should include high-level information from the following parts of your completed paper:
    _introduction, literature review, proven program, proposed program, recommendations, and conclusion_. You must include at least three key words are required.

    _Abstract should immediately follow the title page, but written after completion of paper and submitted with paper 2_

    Word limit: 250

    **Paper 1 (First half of entire paper)**

    I.
    **Introduction**

    **Length = 1 page**

    a.
    **Opening Statement:** The opening sentence should include the significance of the issue explored in the paper. Describe the impact of the issue on the health of the population.

    b.
    **Transition Sentences:** Explore the impact of social, behavior and environmental factors on the health of the population. Describe prevalence and incidence rates of the health problem in the community.

    c.
    **Purpose Statement:** The purpose statement should explore the significance of resolving the issue. Describe measures that can reduce the impact of this issue on the residents. Brifely describe a program that successfully mitigated the problem in your community.

    The introduction should be brief, interesting and motivate audiences to read the paper further. You must use citations throughout, as needed. Use sources from government or intitutional websites to support the introductory paragraph. Some examples are listed below:

    · United Nations:
    [https://www.un.org/en/](https://www.un.org/en/)

    · World Health Organization:
    [https://www.who.int/](https://www.who.int/)

    II.
    **Literature Review**

    **Length** **= 5/6 (1 page review per study = 5 pages)**

    The literature review provides a framework for establishing the significance of your research topic (Creswell, 2014). For this research paper, you will select 5 studies from peer-reviewed journals. The literature review should include the following components:

    1.
    **Introduction:** The opening sentence should isolate the research problem. Then, explain why it is necessary to solve the problem. Include names of databases used to conduct the research. List search terms used to find the research articles.

    2.
    **Review of the literature:** All study components should be described in detail –
    _study purpose_,
    _methods-characterstics of the participants (gender and ethnicity), number of participants, participant recruitment, data collection methods, study design, key findings/results and recommendations._

    3.
    **Analysis of the literature:** Analyze what you have learned about the research problem through the research summarized in the Review of the Literature. Present similarities and differences in methodologies, findings and recommendations

    ### Paper 2 (second half of entire paper)

    III.
    **Proven Program from the Literature**

    **Length = 1 page**

    Describe a program that was implemented successfully in your region/country. Explain how the program was successful in addressing the selected global health problem. Program components should be described in detail.

    **Sample program:** The WASH program – UN is an example of a successful global public health program aimed at providing access to clean water, sanitation, and handwashing facilties focused on promoting health among underpriviliged residents living in impoverished communities.

    Please click on this link for detail (
    [https://www.unicef.org/wash/](https://www.unicef.org/wash/))

    IV.
    **Proposed Program**

    **Length = 3 pages (1 page per objective/description)**

    Create an innovative program aimed at successfully alleviating the selected health problem. Use componets of your proven program and literature to solve the problem.

    Your proposed program should include 1 goal and at least 3 SMART objectives. A SMART objective is one that is Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-Bound.

    Use the SMART guide to create objectives for your program.

    **_Sample SMART Objective:_**

    _By the year two of the project, the Division of Cancer will have trained 75% of elementary schools in district 1, 3, and 6 on the selected scientifically based sun safety health education curriculum._

    V.
    **Recommendation**

    **Length = 1 page**

    This is your opportunity to propose innovative solutions aimed at mitigating the health problem. The recommendations should be evidence-based and practical. The solutions should be derived from literature and proven policies/program.

    VI.
    **Conclusion**

    **Length = 1 page**

    This section should highlight the major components of the paper:

    1. Lit review

    2. Proven program

    3. Proposed progam

    4. Recommendations

    Follow APA7 Guidelines (
    [www.owl.english.purdue.edu](http://www.owl.english.purdue.edu/) and
    [www.apastyle.org](http://www.apastyle.org/)). Proper in-text citaion and a reference list are required. Seek help from the writing specialist at the Graduate Research Center. Monroe College Library data bases and open access journals should be utilized to conduct a comprehensive literature review and develop an evidence based program.

    ## Presentation PowerPoint Instructions

    · With the information you gathered for your Research Paper, you will now create an intriguing visual presentation and present it to the class.

    · Presentation should include 10 slides-Background (1 slide), literature review (1 slide), program goal and objectives (1 slide), Program (5 slides), recommendation (1 slide) and conclusion (1 slide).

    · Your presentation should be between 5-7 minutes long; practice it several times beforehand!

    ## Presentation Recording Instructions

    Students will recording their oral presentation on the information from the PowerPoint (no reading from the slides). This is their opportunity to professionally share their findings and information, orally.

    6

    **## EnvironmentalandOccupationalHealth.docx**

    **Assignment**

    Submit your environmental health "Paper Topic" in this discussion board. Argue the significance of this issue in improving the health of the public. Each topic should be supported by two peer-reviewed articles (300 words; APA citations required).

    This maps to LO1, LO3, LO6, LO8

    **## Paper1Firsthalfofentirepaper.docx**

    **Paper 1 (First half of entire paper)**

    **I. Introduction**

    Length = 1 page

    1. Opening Statement: The opening sentence should include the significance of the issue explored in the paper. Describe the impact of the issue on the health of the population.

    2. Transition Sentences: Explore the impact of social, behavioral, and environmental factors on the health of the population. Describe the prevalence and incidence rates of the health problem in the community.

    3. Purpose Statement: The purpose statement should explore the significance of resolving the issue. Describe measures that can reduce the impact of this issue on the residents. Briefly describe a program that successfully mitigated the problem in your community.

    The introduction should be brief, interesting, and motivate audiences to read the paper further. You must use citations throughout, as needed. Use sources from government or institutional websites to support the introductory paragraph. Some examples are listed below:

    ·        United Nations:
    [https://www.un.org/en/](https://www.un.org/en/)

    ·        World Health Organization:
    [https://www.who.int/](https://www.who.int/)

    **II.  Literature Review (include your two other literature review articles)**

    **Length** **= 5/6 (1 page review per study = 5 pages)**

    The literature review provides a framework for establishing the significance of your research topic (Creswell, 2014). For this research paper, you will select 5 studies from peer-reviewed journals. The literature review should include the following components:

    1.
    **Introduction:** The opening sentence should isolate the research problem. Then, explain why it is necessary to solve the problem. Include names of databases used to conduct the research. List search terms used to find the research articles.

    2.
    **Review of the literature:** All study components should be described in detail –
    _study purpose_,
    _methods-characteristics of the participants (gender and ethnicity), number of participants, participant recruitment, data collection methods, study design, key findings/results, and recommendations._

    3.
    **Analysis of the literature:** Analyze what you have learned about the research problem through the research summarized in the Review of the Literature. Present similarities and differences in methodologies, findings, and recommendations

    **## ResearchTermProject-Parts1and2PowerPointandSpeechRecording.docx**

    ## PH640 Research Paper Guidelines

    You are a Region or Country Director for a Non-Profit organization in the US. In 11-13 pages, you will identify a major environmental health problem afflicting your region/country and propose an innovative solution (a health education intervention or health administration change). The final paper should include following components:

    **Abstract**

    Briefly describe major components of the research paper. The abstract should include high-level information from the following parts of your completed paper:
    _introduction, literature review, proven program, proposed program, recommendations, and conclusion_. You must include at least three key words are required.

    _Abstract should immediately follow the title page, but written after completion of paper and submitted with paper 2_

    Word limit: 250

    **Paper 1 (First half of entire paper)**

    I.
    **Introduction**

    **Length = 1 page**

    a.
    **Opening Statement:** The opening sentence should include the significance of the issue explored in the paper. Describe the impact of the issue on the health of the population.

    b.
    **Transition Sentences:** Explore the impact of social, behavior and environmental factors on the health of the population. Describe prevalence and incidence rates of the health problem in the community.

    c.
    **Purpose Statement:** The purpose statement should explore the significance of resolving the issue. Describe measures that can reduce the impact of this issue on the residents. Brifely describe a program that successfully mitigated the problem in your community.

    The introduction should be brief, interesting and motivate audiences to read the paper further. You must use citations throughout, as needed. Use sources from government or intitutional websites to support the introductory paragraph. Some examples are listed below:

    · United Nations:
    [https://www.un.org/en/](https://www.un.org/en/)

    · World Health Organization:
    [https://www.who.int/](https://www.who.int/)

    II.
    **Literature Review**

    **Length** **= 5/6 (1 page review per study = 5 pages)**

    The literature review provides a framework for establishing the significance of your research topic (Creswell, 2014). For this research paper, you will select 5 studies from peer-reviewed journals. The literature review should include the following components:

    1.
    **Introduction:** The opening sentence should isolate the research problem. Then, explain why it is necessary to solve the problem. Include names of databases used to conduct the research. List search terms used to find the research articles.

    2.
    **Review of the literature:** All study components should be described in detail –
    _study purpose_,
    _methods-characterstics of the participants (gender and ethnicity), number of participants, participant recruitment, data collection methods, study design, key findings/results and recommendations._

    3.
    **Analysis of the literature:** Analyze what you have learned about the research problem through the research summarized in the Review of the Literature. Present similarities and differences in methodologies, findings and recommendations

    ### Paper 2 (second half of entire paper)

    III.
    **Proven Program from the Literature**

    **Length = 1 page**

    Describe a program that was implemented successfully in your region/country. Explain how the program was successful in addressing the selected global health problem. Program components should be described in detail.

    **Sample program:** The WASH program – UN is an example of a successful global public health program aimed at providing access to clean water, sanitation, and handwashing facilties focused on promoting health among underpriviliged residents living in impoverished communities.

    Please click on this link for detail (
    [https://www.unicef.org/wash/](https://www.unicef.org/wash/))

    IV.
    **Proposed Program**

    **Length = 3 pages (1 page per objective/description)**

    Create an innovative program aimed at successfully alleviating the selected health problem. Use componets of your proven program and literature to solve the problem.

    Your proposed program should include 1 goal and at least 3 SMART objectives. A SMART objective is one that is Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-Bound.

    Use the SMART guide to create objectives for your program.

    **_Sample SMART Objective:_**

    _By the year two of the project, the Division of Cancer will have trained 75% of elementary schools in district 1, 3, and 6 on the selected scientifically based sun safety health education curriculum._

    V.
    **Recommendation**

    **Length = 1 page**

    This is your opportunity to propose innovative solutions aimed at mitigating the health problem. The recommendations should be evidence-based and practical. The solutions should be derived from literature and proven policies/program.

    VI.
    **Conclusion**

    **Length = 1 page**

    This section should highlight the major components of the paper:

    1. Lit review

    2. Proven program

    3. Proposed progam

    4. Recommendations

    Follow APA7 Guidelines (
    [www.owl.english.purdue.edu](http://www.owl.english.purdue.edu/) and
    [www.apastyle.org](http://www.apastyle.org/)). Proper in-text citaion and a reference list are required. Seek help from the writing specialist at the Graduate Research Center. Monroe College Library data bases and open access journals should be utilized to conduct a comprehensive literature review and develop an evidence based program.

    ## Presentation PowerPoint Instructions

    · With the information you gathered for your Research Paper, you will now create an intriguing visual presentation and present it to the class.

    · Presentation should include 10 slides-Background (1 slide), literature review (1 slide), program goal and objectives (1 slide), Program (5 slides), recommendation (1 slide) and conclusion (1 slide).

    · Your presentation should be between 5-7 minutes long; practice it several times beforehand!

    ## Presentation Recording Instructions

    Students will recording their oral presentation on the information from the PowerPoint (no reading from the slides). This is their opportunity to professionally share their findings and information, orally.

    6

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] 601 health promo mod 4 disc

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 601 health promo mod 4 disc.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] 504 advanced health mod 4 disc

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 504 advanced health mod 4 disc.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Disc3 evp

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Post a brief description of your clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question. Describe your search results in terms of the number of articles returned on original research and how this c…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Post a brief description of your clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question. Describe your search results in terms of the number of articles returned on original research and how this changed as you added search terms using your Boolean operators. Finally, explain strategies you might make to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search on your PICO(T) question. Be specific and provide examples.**

  • [Solved] reflection

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering reflection.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] nur509 discussion 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## NUR509discussion4.docx **## NUR509discussion4.docx** ![A screenshot of a medical report AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509-discussion-4) ![A white sheet with black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## NUR509discussion4.docx

    **## NUR509discussion4.docx**

    ![A screenshot of a medical report AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509-discussion-4)

    ![A white sheet with black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509-discussion-4)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## NUR509discussion4.docx**

    ![A screenshot of a medical report AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509-discussion-4)

    ![A white sheet with black text AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur509-discussion-4)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png