Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (5)** – ## SimulationcasestudyModul3.docx – ## NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf – ## NURS_6512_PhysicalExamination_ReferenceSheet.pdf – ## NURS_6512_ComprehensiveHealthHistory_ReferenceSheet1.pdf – ## NURS_6512_M3AS2_Assignment_Template.docx **## SimulationcasestudyModul3…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (5)**

    – ## SimulationcasestudyModul3.docx

    – ## NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf

    – ## NURS_6512_PhysicalExamination_ReferenceSheet.pdf

    – ## NURS_6512_ComprehensiveHealthHistory_ReferenceSheet1.pdf

    – ## NURS_6512_M3AS2_Assignment_Template.docx

    **## SimulationcasestudyModul3.docx**

    **Simulation Case Studies -Burning In Chest After Eating**

    **Burning in Chest After Eating Presentation**

    **Angela Brooks**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-20978701)

    **Age:** 52

    **Sex:** Female

    **Race/Ethnicity:** African American

    **Marital Status:** Divorced

    **Occupation:** Real Estate Agent

    **Insurance:** Private

    **Living Situation:** Lives alone

    **Chief Complaint (CC):** Burning in Chest After Eating

    **Patient Statement**

    For about the past three or four months, I’ve been getting this burning feeling in the middle of my chest after I eat. It usually starts about 30 minutes to an hour after meals, especially if I eat something spicy or fried. Sometimes it feels like the food is coming back up into my throat, and I get a sour taste in my mouth.

    It’s not really a sharp pain — more like a burning pressure. I’d rate it about a 5 out of 10. It’s worse when I lie down at night, and I’ve had to prop myself up on pillows. I’ve also noticed I clear my throat a lot in the mornings.

    I haven’t had shortness of breath. No sweating. No pain going into my arm or jaw. I haven’t thrown up, and I haven’t seen any blood. My weight has been stable.

    I drink coffee every morning and usually have a glass of wine a few nights a week. I’ve been under some stress lately and probably eat out more than I should. I’ve been taking over-the-counter antacids, and they help, but the symptoms keep coming back.

    © 2026 Walden University, LLC

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Assessment Reference Sheet
    Purpose
    To guide you in writing a clear, logical Assessment, including differential diagnoses, one final
    diagnosis supported by evidence, and required references supporting clinical reasoning.

    Overview of Expectations
    – Include 3–5 differential diagnoses.

    – Select ONE final diagnosis.

    – Support all reasoning with subjective and objective findings.

    – Use professional, concise clinical language.

    – Include 3–5 peer-reviewed references (≤5 years old) to support diagnostic reasoning.

    Differential Diagnoses (3–5 Required)
    Differential #1
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #2
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #3
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #4 (Optional)

    Differential #5 (Optional)

    Final Diagnosis (ONE ONLY)
    Final Diagnosis: [Write the final diagnosis here]

    Final Problem Statement Template
    [Initials/Name], [Age], presents with [chief complaint] characterized by [positive subjective
    findings] and denies [negative subjective findings]. Physical exam reveals [positive objective
    findings] with absence of [negative objective findings]. Pertinent history includes [relevant PMH,
    family history, or risk factors]. The overall clinical picture is most consistent with [final diagnosis].

    Reference Requirements
    You must include 3–5 peer-reviewed journal references (published within the last 5 years) to
    support diagnostic reasoning in the Assessment. References must:
    – Align with the differential diagnoses and/or final diagnosis.

    – Support pathophysiology, clinical presentation, or diagnostic criteria.
    – Be cited in APA 7th edition format.
    – Not include textbooks, blogs, or patient-education websites.

    Example acceptable sources:
    – Peer-reviewed journal articles
    – Clinical practice guidelines (ACC/AHA, ADA, IDSA, AAP, USPSTF)
    – Systematic reviews or meta-analyses

    **## NURS_6512_PhysicalExamination_ReferenceSheet.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Physical Examination Reference Sheet
    NURS 6512 – Advanced Health Assessment & Diagnostic Reasoning

    Purpose: To guide students in documenting objective findings only during the physical
    examination.

    REMINDER: PHYSICAL EXAM = OBJECTIVE DATA ONLY
    This section should include only what you observe, measure, or assess — not what the patient
    reports. Do NOT include subjective statements or history.

    ✅ Correct (Objective): “Lungs clear to auscultation bilaterally; no wheezes, rales, or rhonchi.”

    ❌ Incorrect (Subjective): “Patient reports shortness of breath and chest tightness.”

    GENERAL FORMAT FOR PHYSICAL EXAM DOCUMENTATION
    • General: Appearance, distress, hygiene, orientation
    • Skin: Color, temperature, turgor, lesions, rashes
    • Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic
    • Eyes: PERRLA, EOMI, conjunctiva clear
    • Ears: TM intact, no erythema or effusion
    • Nose: Mucosa pink, septum midline, no discharge
    • Mouth/Throat: Mucosa moist, no erythema or exudate
    • Neck: Supple, no lymphadenopathy, thyroid non-enlarged
    • Cardiac: RRR, no murmurs, rubs, or gallops
    • Lungs: CTA bilaterally, no wheezes, rales, or rhonchi
    • Abdomen: Contour, bowel sounds, tenderness, organomegaly
    • GU: External genitalia, discharge, lesions, CVA tenderness (as indicated)
    • Musculoskeletal: ROM, strength, gait, deformities, tenderness
    • Lower Extremities: Edema, pulses, color, warmth, capillary refill, sensation
    • Neuro: CN II–XII grossly intact, strength and sensation symmetrical

    Chief Complaint, Must-Not-Miss Diagnoses, and Systems to Examine
    Identify high-priority conditions and focus your exam to rule them out.

    Chief Complaint Must-Not-Miss Diagnoses Systems to Examine

    Cough or Shortness of
    Breath

    Pneumonia, Pulmonary
    embolism, Myocardial
    infarction, Heart failure,
    Pneumothorax

    Respiratory, Cardiac, ENT,
    Skin (cyanosis), Lower
    Extremities (edema/DVT
    signs)

    Abdominal Pain Appendicitis, Bowel
    obstruction, Perforated

    Abdomen, GU, Cardiac,
    Respiratory, Skin

    ulcer, Ectopic pregnancy,
    Cholecystitis, Pancreatitis

    (jaundice), Neuro (pain
    localization)

    Headache Subarachnoid hemorrhage,
    Meningitis, Temporal
    arteritis, Intracranial mass,
    Hypertensive emergency,
    CVA (stroke)

    Neuro, HEENT, Neck, Eyes
    (fundoscopic), Cardiac (BP),
    Skin (rash/meningitis)

    Back Pain Cauda equina syndrome,
    Epidural abscess, Spinal
    fracture, Pyelonephritis,
    Abdominal aortic aneurysm
    (AAA)

    Musculoskeletal, Neuro,
    Abdomen, GU (CVA
    tenderness), Skin
    (infection)

    UTI Symptoms Pyelonephritis, Urosepsis,
    Pregnancy, Obstructive
    uropathy

    Abdomen, GU, CVA
    tenderness, Skin (fever
    signs), Neuro (confusion in
    elderly)

    Sore Throat Peritonsillar abscess,
    Epiglottitis, Mononucleosis,
    Streptococcal pharyngitis

    HEENT, Lymphatic, Neck,
    Cardiac, Respiratory
    (airway), Skin
    (rash/scarlatina)

    Rash Cellulitis, Meningococcemia,
    Stevens-Johnson syndrome,
    Drug reaction, Anaphylaxis

    Skin, Lymphatic, HEENT
    (mucosal lesions),
    Respiratory (distress),
    Cardiac (shock signs)

    Extremity/Joint Pain DVT, Septic joint, Fracture,
    Cellulitis, Compartment
    syndrome

    Musculoskeletal, Neuro,
    Lower Extremities (pulses,
    edema, warmth, sensation),
    Skin

    DOCUMENTATION TIP
    • Use head-to-toe format only for comprehensive exams (annuals, new patient, baseline).
    • Use focused format for problem-based visits.
    • Objective findings should align with your assessment and must-not-miss differential diagnoses.

    **## NURS_6512_ComprehensiveHealthHistory_ReferenceSheet1.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Comprehensive Health History Reference Sheet

    ⚠ Reminder: The health history includes **subjective data only** — information
    provided by the patient about their symptoms, perceptions, and experiences.
    Objective findings belong in the physical exam section.

    Chief Complaint (CC)

    • State the patient’s main reason for visit — concise and focused.
    • Use the patient’s own words in quotes (1–2 words or one short sentence).
    • Example: “Sore throat for two days.” or “Shortness of breath.”

    History of Present Illness (HPI) – OLDCARTS + Pertinent History

    • Use OLDCARTS to gather data, then synthesize into a cohesive paragraph written
    in complete sentences.
    • Avoid bullet points. Tell the story of the symptom(s) using the data you collected.
    • O – Onset: When did it start?
    • L – Location: Where is it? Does it radiate?
    • D – Duration: Constant or intermittent?
    • C – Character: Describe the quality (sharp, dull, throbbing).
    • A – Aggravating factors: What makes it worse?
    • R – Relieving factors: What makes it better?
    • T – Timing: Pattern, frequency, time of day.
    • S – Severity: 0–10 pain scale or functional impact.
    • Include associated symptoms and pertinent negatives (important symptoms the
    patient denies).
    • Incorporate pertinent history such as recent illness, exposures, travel, medications
    tried, previous episodes, or related chronic conditions.
    • Example: The HPI should read as a full paragraph that flows logically and reflects
    critical thinking — not as a list of OLDCARTS items.

    Past Medical History (PMH)

    • Chronic illnesses (HTN, DM, asthma, etc.)
    • Childhood illnesses (if relevant)
    • Hospitalizations and psychiatric history

    Surgical History (PSH)

    • List all surgeries/procedures with year, indication, and complications

    Medications

    • List all: prescription, OTC, herbal, and supplements
    • Include name, dose, route, frequency, indication
    • Note adherence and side effects

    Allergies

    • Drug, food, environmental — include reaction type (rash, anaphylaxis, etc.)
    • Document tolerated alternatives if known

    Preventive Health

    • Immunizations: Flu, COVID-19, Tdap, shingles, pneumococcal
    • Screenings: Pap, mammogram, colonoscopy, lipid, glucose, DEXA
    • Risk factors: Diet, exercise, safety, sexual health, sleep, stress, dental, vision

    Social History

    • Tobacco: Type, amount, duration, quit attempts
    • Alcohol: Type, frequency, quantity (CAGE if indicated)
    • Substance use: Illicit or prescription misuse
    • Occupation: Exposures, stress, satisfaction
    • Living situation & support system
    • Safety: IPV, firearms, seatbelt use
    • Social Determinants of Health (SDOH): Housing, food, transport, access, finances

    Review of Systems (ROS)

    These are subjective symptoms that the patient reports. No objective exam findings
    should be included here.

    • General: Fever, chills, weight change, fatigue
    • Skin: Rashes, lesions, itching
    • HEENT: Vision, hearing, congestion, sore throat
    • Cardiac: Chest pain, palpitations, edema
    • Respiratory: Cough, SOB, wheezing
    • GI: N/V/D, constipation, pain, appetite
    • GU: Dysuria, frequency, hematuria
    • MSK: Joint pain, stiffness, weakness
    • Neuro: Headache, dizziness, numbness, seizures
    • Psych: Mood, anxiety, sleep
    • Endo: Heat/cold intolerance, polyuria/polydipsia
    • Heme: Easy bruising/bleeding

    **## NURS_6512_M3AS2_Assignment_Template.docx**

    **NURS 6512**

    **Week 7 Assignment Template**

    **Comprehensive Health History, Physical Examination, and Assessment Template**

    **Part I: Comprehensive Health History (Subjective Data Only)**

    **Subjective Data**

    Chief Complaint (CC):

    History of Present Illness (HPI):

    Past Medical History (PMH):

    Surgical History (PSH):

    Medications:

    Allergies:

    Preventive Health:

    Social History:

    **Review of Systems (ROS) (Subjective Data Only – Patient-Reported Symptoms):**

    General:

    Skin:

    HEENT:

    Cardiac:

    Respiratory:

    Gastrointestinal (GI):

    Genitourinary (GU):

    Musculoskeletal (MSK):

    Neurologic:

    Psychiatric:

    Endocrine:

    Hematologic/Lymphatic/Immune:

    **Part II: Focused Physical Examination (Objective Data Only)**

    **Physical Examination: Objective Data Only (Do NOT include subjective statements):**

    General:

    Skin:

    Head:

    Eyes:

    Ears:

    Nose:

    Mouth/Throat:

    Neck:

    Cardiac:

    Lungs:

    Abdomen:

    Genitourinary (GU):

    Musculoskeletal:

    Lower Extremities:

    Neurologic:

    **Part III: Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning**

    **Part III, Section 1: Three Differential Diagnoses**

    **Directions:** Using the template below, for each differential diagnosis, provide pathophysiologic explanation, identify pertinent positives, identify pertinent negatives, explain why it is ruled in or ruled out.

    **Differential Diagnosis #1:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Differential Diagnosis #2:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Differential Diagnosis #3:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Part III, Section 2: One Primary Diagnosis**

    **Directions:** Indicate your final diagnosis (
    **ONE** ONLY). Include your diagnostic reasoning with rationale: provide clear clinical justification, correlate subjective and objective findings, and explain why competing diagnoses are less likely.

    **Part III, Section 3: Final Problem Statement**

    **Directions:** Use the template below to write a final, synthesized problem statement.

    [Initials/Name], [Age], presents with [chief complaint] characterized by [positive subjective findings] and denies [negative subjective findings]. Physical exam reveals [positive objective findings] with absence of [negative objective findings]. Pertinent history includes [relevant PMH, family history, or risk factors]. The overall clinical picture is most consistent with [final diagnosis].

    **Part IV: Reflection**

    This reflection is designed to strengthen your clinical reasoning and your ability to clearly separate subjective and objective data in documentation.

    **Part IV, Section 1: Subjective vs. Objective Distinction**

    1. Identify one example in your documentation where it was challenging to separate subjective and objective data.

    2. Explain how you ensured patient-reported symptoms remained in the history/ROS and observable findings remained in the physical exam.

    3. Briefly explain why this distinction is important for diagnostic accuracy.

    **Part IV, Section 2: Diagnostic Reasoning**

    1. Identify one differential diagnosis you strongly considered but ultimately ruled out.

    2. List
    **two** key findings (pertinent positives or negatives) that helped you rule it out.

    3. State what finding most strongly supported your final diagnosis.

    **References**

    List 3–5 peer-reviewed references, less than 5 Years Old. Cite all sources in APA format.

    **## NURS_6512_M3AS2_Assignment_Template.docx**

    **NURS 6512**

    **Week 7 Assignment Template**

    **Comprehensive Health History, Physical Examination, and Assessment Template**

    **Part I: Comprehensive Health History (Subjective Data Only)**

    **Subjective Data**

    Chief Complaint (CC):

    History of Present Illness (HPI):

    Past Medical History (PMH):

    Surgical History (PSH):

    Medications:

    Allergies:

    Preventive Health:

    Social History:

    **Review of Systems (ROS) (Subjective Data Only – Patient-Reported Symptoms):**

    General:

    Skin:

    HEENT:

    Cardiac:

    Respiratory:

    Gastrointestinal (GI):

    Genitourinary (GU):

    Musculoskeletal (MSK):

    Neurologic:

    Psychiatric:

    Endocrine:

    Hematologic/Lymphatic/Immune:

    **Part II: Focused Physical Examination (Objective Data Only)**

    **Physical Examination: Objective Data Only (Do NOT include subjective statements):**

    General:

    Skin:

    Head:

    Eyes:

    Ears:

    Nose:

    Mouth/Throat:

    Neck:

    Cardiac:

    Lungs:

    Abdomen:

    Genitourinary (GU):

    Musculoskeletal:

    Lower Extremities:

    Neurologic:

    **Part III: Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning**

    **Part III, Section 1: Three Differential Diagnoses**

    **Directions:** Using the template below, for each differential diagnosis, provide pathophysiologic explanation, identify pertinent positives, identify pertinent negatives, explain why it is ruled in or ruled out.

    **Differential Diagnosis #1:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Differential Diagnosis #2:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Differential Diagnosis #3:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Part III, Section 2: One Primary Diagnosis**

    **Directions:** Indicate your final diagnosis (
    **ONE** ONLY). Include your diagnostic reasoning with rationale: provide clear clinical justification, correlate subjective and objective findings, and explain why competing diagnoses are less likely.

    **Part III, Section 3: Final Problem Statement**

    **Directions:** Use the template below to write a final, synthesized problem statement.

    [Initials/Name], [Age], presents with [chief complaint] characterized by [positive subjective findings] and denies [negative subjective findings]. Physical exam reveals [positive objective findings] with absence of [negative objective findings]. Pertinent history includes [relevant PMH, family history, or risk factors]. The overall clinical picture is most consistent with [final diagnosis].

    **Part IV: Reflection**

    This reflection is designed to strengthen your clinical reasoning and your ability to clearly separate subjective and objective data in documentation.

    **Part IV, Section 1: Subjective vs. Objective Distinction**

    1. Identify one example in your documentation where it was challenging to separate subjective and objective data.

    2. Explain how you ensured patient-reported symptoms remained in the history/ROS and observable findings remained in the physical exam.

    3. Briefly explain why this distinction is important for diagnostic accuracy.

    **Part IV, Section 2: Diagnostic Reasoning**

    1. Identify one differential diagnosis you strongly considered but ultimately ruled out.

    2. List
    **two** key findings (pertinent positives or negatives) that helped you rule it out.

    3. State what finding most strongly supported your final diagnosis.

    **References**

    List 3–5 peer-reviewed references, less than 5 Years Old. Cite all sources in APA format.

    **## SimulationcasestudyModul3.docx**

    **Simulation Case Studies -Burning In Chest After Eating**

    **Burning in Chest After Eating Presentation**

    **Angela Brooks**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-20978701)

    **Age:** 52

    **Sex:** Female

    **Race/Ethnicity:** African American

    **Marital Status:** Divorced

    **Occupation:** Real Estate Agent

    **Insurance:** Private

    **Living Situation:** Lives alone

    **Chief Complaint (CC):** Burning in Chest After Eating

    **Patient Statement**

    For about the past three or four months, I’ve been getting this burning feeling in the middle of my chest after I eat. It usually starts about 30 minutes to an hour after meals, especially if I eat something spicy or fried. Sometimes it feels like the food is coming back up into my throat, and I get a sour taste in my mouth.

    It’s not really a sharp pain — more like a burning pressure. I’d rate it about a 5 out of 10. It’s worse when I lie down at night, and I’ve had to prop myself up on pillows. I’ve also noticed I clear my throat a lot in the mornings.

    I haven’t had shortness of breath. No sweating. No pain going into my arm or jaw. I haven’t thrown up, and I haven’t seen any blood. My weight has been stable.

    I drink coffee every morning and usually have a glass of wine a few nights a week. I’ve been under some stress lately and probably eat out more than I should. I’ve been taking over-the-counter antacids, and they help, but the symptoms keep coming back.

    © 2026 Walden University, LLC

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Assessment Reference Sheet
    Purpose
    To guide you in writing a clear, logical Assessment, including differential diagnoses, one final
    diagnosis supported by evidence, and required references supporting clinical reasoning.

    Overview of Expectations
    – Include 3–5 differential diagnoses.

    – Select ONE final diagnosis.

    – Support all reasoning with subjective and objective findings.

    – Use professional, concise clinical language.

    – Include 3–5 peer-reviewed references (≤5 years old) to support diagnostic reasoning.

    Differential Diagnoses (3–5 Required)
    Differential #1
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #2
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #3
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #4 (Optional)

    Differential #5 (Optional)

    Final Diagnosis (ONE ONLY)
    Final Diagnosis: [Write the final diagnosis here]

    Final Problem Statement Template
    [Initials/Name], [Age], presents with [chief complaint] characterized by [positive subjective
    findings] and denies [negative subjective findings]. Physical exam reveals [positive objective
    findings] with absence of [negative objective findings]. Pertinent history includes [relevant PMH,
    family history, or risk factors]. The overall clinical picture is most consistent with [final diagnosis].

    Reference Requirements
    You must include 3–5 peer-reviewed journal references (published within the last 5 years) to
    support diagnostic reasoning in the Assessment. References must:
    – Align with the differential diagnoses and/or final diagnosis.

    – Support pathophysiology, clinical presentation, or diagnostic criteria.
    – Be cited in APA 7th edition format.
    – Not include textbooks, blogs, or patient-education websites.

    Example acceptable sources:
    – Peer-reviewed journal articles
    – Clinical practice guidelines (ACC/AHA, ADA, IDSA, AAP, USPSTF)
    – Systematic reviews or meta-analyses

    **## NURS_6512_PhysicalExamination_ReferenceSheet.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Physical Examination Reference Sheet
    NURS 6512 – Advanced Health Assessment & Diagnostic Reasoning

    Purpose: To guide students in documenting objective findings only during the physical
    examination.

    REMINDER: PHYSICAL EXAM = OBJECTIVE DATA ONLY
    This section should include only what you observe, measure, or assess — not what the patient
    reports. Do NOT include subjective statements or history.

    ✅ Correct (Objective): “Lungs clear to auscultation bilaterally; no wheezes, rales, or rhonchi.”

    ❌ Incorrect (Subjective): “Patient reports shortness of breath and chest tightness.”

    GENERAL FORMAT FOR PHYSICAL EXAM DOCUMENTATION
    • General: Appearance, distress, hygiene, orientation
    • Skin: Color, temperature, turgor, lesions, rashes
    • Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic
    • Eyes: PERRLA, EOMI, conjunctiva clear
    • Ears: TM intact, no erythema or effusion
    • Nose: Mucosa pink, septum midline, no discharge
    • Mouth/Throat: Mucosa moist, no erythema or exudate
    • Neck: Supple, no lymphadenopathy, thyroid non-enlarged
    • Cardiac: RRR, no murmurs, rubs, or gallops
    • Lungs: CTA bilaterally, no wheezes, rales, or rhonchi
    • Abdomen: Contour, bowel sounds, tenderness, organomegaly
    • GU: External genitalia, discharge, lesions, CVA tenderness (as indicated)
    • Musculoskeletal: ROM, strength, gait, deformities, tenderness
    • Lower Extremities: Edema, pulses, color, warmth, capillary refill, sensation
    • Neuro: CN II–XII grossly intact, strength and sensation symmetrical

    Chief Complaint, Must-Not-Miss Diagnoses, and Systems to Examine
    Identify high-priority conditions and focus your exam to rule them out.

    Chief Complaint Must-Not-Miss Diagnoses Systems to Examine

    Cough or Shortness of
    Breath

    Pneumonia, Pulmonary
    embolism, Myocardial
    infarction, Heart failure,
    Pneumothorax

    Respiratory, Cardiac, ENT,
    Skin (cyanosis), Lower
    Extremities (edema/DVT
    signs)

    Abdominal Pain Appendicitis, Bowel
    obstruction, Perforated

    Abdomen, GU, Cardiac,
    Respiratory, Skin

    ulcer, Ectopic pregnancy,
    Cholecystitis, Pancreatitis

    (jaundice), Neuro (pain
    localization)

    Headache Subarachnoid hemorrhage,
    Meningitis, Temporal
    arteritis, Intracranial mass,
    Hypertensive emergency,
    CVA (stroke)

    Neuro, HEENT, Neck, Eyes
    (fundoscopic), Cardiac (BP),
    Skin (rash/meningitis)

    Back Pain Cauda equina syndrome,
    Epidural abscess, Spinal
    fracture, Pyelonephritis,
    Abdominal aortic aneurysm
    (AAA)

    Musculoskeletal, Neuro,
    Abdomen, GU (CVA
    tenderness), Skin
    (infection)

    UTI Symptoms Pyelonephritis, Urosepsis,
    Pregnancy, Obstructive
    uropathy

    Abdomen, GU, CVA
    tenderness, Skin (fever
    signs), Neuro (confusion in
    elderly)

    Sore Throat Peritonsillar abscess,
    Epiglottitis, Mononucleosis,
    Streptococcal pharyngitis

    HEENT, Lymphatic, Neck,
    Cardiac, Respiratory
    (airway), Skin
    (rash/scarlatina)

    Rash Cellulitis, Meningococcemia,
    Stevens-Johnson syndrome,
    Drug reaction, Anaphylaxis

    Skin, Lymphatic, HEENT
    (mucosal lesions),
    Respiratory (distress),
    Cardiac (shock signs)

    Extremity/Joint Pain DVT, Septic joint, Fracture,
    Cellulitis, Compartment
    syndrome

    Musculoskeletal, Neuro,
    Lower Extremities (pulses,
    edema, warmth, sensation),
    Skin

    DOCUMENTATION TIP
    • Use head-to-toe format only for comprehensive exams (annuals, new patient, baseline).
    • Use focused format for problem-based visits.
    • Objective findings should align with your assessment and must-not-miss differential diagnoses.

    **## NURS_6512_ComprehensiveHealthHistory_ReferenceSheet1.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Comprehensive Health History Reference Sheet

    ⚠ Reminder: The health history includes **subjective data only** — information
    provided by the patient about their symptoms, perceptions, and experiences.
    Objective findings belong in the physical exam section.

    Chief Complaint (CC)

    • State the patient’s main reason for visit — concise and focused.
    • Use the patient’s own words in quotes (1–2 words or one short sentence).
    • Example: “Sore throat for two days.” or “Shortness of breath.”

    History of Present Illness (HPI) – OLDCARTS + Pertinent History

    • Use OLDCARTS to gather data, then synthesize into a cohesive paragraph written
    in complete sentences.
    • Avoid bullet points. Tell the story of the symptom(s) using the data you collected.
    • O – Onset: When did it start?
    • L – Location: Where is it? Does it radiate?
    • D – Duration: Constant or intermittent?
    • C – Character: Describe the quality (sharp, dull, throbbing).
    • A – Aggravating factors: What makes it worse?
    • R – Relieving factors: What makes it better?
    • T – Timing: Pattern, frequency, time of day.
    • S – Severity: 0–10 pain scale or functional impact.
    • Include associated symptoms and pertinent negatives (important symptoms the
    patient denies).
    • Incorporate pertinent history such as recent illness, exposures, travel, medications
    tried, previous episodes, or related chronic conditions.
    • Example: The HPI should read as a full paragraph that flows logically and reflects
    critical thinking — not as a list of OLDCARTS items.

    Past Medical History (PMH)

    • Chronic illnesses (HTN, DM, asthma, etc.)
    • Childhood illnesses (if relevant)
    • Hospitalizations and psychiatric history

    Surgical History (PSH)

    • List all surgeries/procedures with year, indication, and complications

    Medications

    • List all: prescription, OTC, herbal, and supplements
    • Include name, dose, route, frequency, indication
    • Note adherence and side effects

    Allergies

    • Drug, food, environmental — include reaction type (rash, anaphylaxis, etc.)
    • Document tolerated alternatives if known

    Preventive Health

    • Immunizations: Flu, COVID-19, Tdap, shingles, pneumococcal
    • Screenings: Pap, mammogram, colonoscopy, lipid, glucose, DEXA
    • Risk factors: Diet, exercise, safety, sexual health, sleep, stress, dental, vision

    Social History

    • Tobacco: Type, amount, duration, quit attempts
    • Alcohol: Type, frequency, quantity (CAGE if indicated)
    • Substance use: Illicit or prescription misuse
    • Occupation: Exposures, stress, satisfaction
    • Living situation & support system
    • Safety: IPV, firearms, seatbelt use
    • Social Determinants of Health (SDOH): Housing, food, transport, access, finances

    Review of Systems (ROS)

    These are subjective symptoms that the patient reports. No objective exam findings
    should be included here.

    • General: Fever, chills, weight change, fatigue
    • Skin: Rashes, lesions, itching
    • HEENT: Vision, hearing, congestion, sore throat
    • Cardiac: Chest pain, palpitations, edema
    • Respiratory: Cough, SOB, wheezing
    • GI: N/V/D, constipation, pain, appetite
    • GU: Dysuria, frequency, hematuria
    • MSK: Joint pain, stiffness, weakness
    • Neuro: Headache, dizziness, numbness, seizures
    • Psych: Mood, anxiety, sleep
    • Endo: Heat/cold intolerance, polyuria/polydipsia
    • Heme: Easy bruising/bleeding

    **## NURS_6512_M3AS2_Assignment_Template.docx**

    **NURS 6512**

    **Week 7 Assignment Template**

    **Comprehensive Health History, Physical Examination, and Assessment Template**

    **Part I: Comprehensive Health History (Subjective Data Only)**

    **Subjective Data**

    Chief Complaint (CC):

    History of Present Illness (HPI):

    Past Medical History (PMH):

    Surgical History (PSH):

    Medications:

    Allergies:

    Preventive Health:

    Social History:

    **Review of Systems (ROS) (Subjective Data Only – Patient-Reported Symptoms):**

    General:

    Skin:

    HEENT:

    Cardiac:

    Respiratory:

    Gastrointestinal (GI):

    Genitourinary (GU):

    Musculoskeletal (MSK):

    Neurologic:

    Psychiatric:

    Endocrine:

    Hematologic/Lymphatic/Immune:

    **Part II: Focused Physical Examination (Objective Data Only)**

    **Physical Examination: Objective Data Only (Do NOT include subjective statements):**

    General:

    Skin:

    Head:

    Eyes:

    Ears:

    Nose:

    Mouth/Throat:

    Neck:

    Cardiac:

    Lungs:

    Abdomen:

    Genitourinary (GU):

    Musculoskeletal:

    Lower Extremities:

    Neurologic:

    **Part III: Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning**

    **Part III, Section 1: Three Differential Diagnoses**

    **Directions:** Using the template below, for each differential diagnosis, provide pathophysiologic explanation, identify pertinent positives, identify pertinent negatives, explain why it is ruled in or ruled out.

    **Differential Diagnosis #1:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Differential Diagnosis #2:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Differential Diagnosis #3:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Part III, Section 2: One Primary Diagnosis**

    **Directions:** Indicate your final diagnosis (
    **ONE** ONLY). Include your diagnostic reasoning with rationale: provide clear clinical justification, correlate subjective and objective findings, and explain why competing diagnoses are less likely.

    **Part III, Section 3: Final Problem Statement**

    **Directions:** Use the template below to write a final, synthesized problem statement.

    [Initials/Name], [Age], presents with [chief complaint] characterized by [positive subjective findings] and denies [negative subjective findings]. Physical exam reveals [positive objective findings] with absence of [negative objective findings]. Pertinent history includes [relevant PMH, family history, or risk factors]. The overall clinical picture is most consistent with [final diagnosis].

    **Part IV: Reflection**

    This reflection is designed to strengthen your clinical reasoning and your ability to clearly separate subjective and objective data in documentation.

    **Part IV, Section 1: Subjective vs. Objective Distinction**

    1. Identify one example in your documentation where it was challenging to separate subjective and objective data.

    2. Explain how you ensured patient-reported symptoms remained in the history/ROS and observable findings remained in the physical exam.

    3. Briefly explain why this distinction is important for diagnostic accuracy.

    **Part IV, Section 2: Diagnostic Reasoning**

    1. Identify one differential diagnosis you strongly considered but ultimately ruled out.

    2. List
    **two** key findings (pertinent positives or negatives) that helped you rule it out.

    3. State what finding most strongly supported your final diagnosis.

    **References**

    List 3–5 peer-reviewed references, less than 5 Years Old. Cite all sources in APA format.

    **## SimulationcasestudyModul3.docx**

    **Simulation Case Studies -Burning In Chest After Eating**

    **Burning in Chest After Eating Presentation**

    **Angela Brooks**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-20978701)

    **Age:** 52

    **Sex:** Female

    **Race/Ethnicity:** African American

    **Marital Status:** Divorced

    **Occupation:** Real Estate Agent

    **Insurance:** Private

    **Living Situation:** Lives alone

    **Chief Complaint (CC):** Burning in Chest After Eating

    **Patient Statement**

    For about the past three or four months, I’ve been getting this burning feeling in the middle of my chest after I eat. It usually starts about 30 minutes to an hour after meals, especially if I eat something spicy or fried. Sometimes it feels like the food is coming back up into my throat, and I get a sour taste in my mouth.

    It’s not really a sharp pain — more like a burning pressure. I’d rate it about a 5 out of 10. It’s worse when I lie down at night, and I’ve had to prop myself up on pillows. I’ve also noticed I clear my throat a lot in the mornings.

    I haven’t had shortness of breath. No sweating. No pain going into my arm or jaw. I haven’t thrown up, and I haven’t seen any blood. My weight has been stable.

    I drink coffee every morning and usually have a glass of wine a few nights a week. I’ve been under some stress lately and probably eat out more than I should. I’ve been taking over-the-counter antacids, and they help, but the symptoms keep coming back.

    © 2026 Walden University, LLC

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Assessment Reference Sheet
    Purpose
    To guide you in writing a clear, logical Assessment, including differential diagnoses, one final
    diagnosis supported by evidence, and required references supporting clinical reasoning.

    Overview of Expectations
    – Include 3–5 differential diagnoses.

    – Select ONE final diagnosis.

    – Support all reasoning with subjective and objective findings.

    – Use professional, concise clinical language.

    – Include 3–5 peer-reviewed references (≤5 years old) to support diagnostic reasoning.

    Differential Diagnoses (3–5 Required)
    Differential #1
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #2
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #3
    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Subjective findings (supporting):

    –

    Subjective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Objective findings (supporting):

    –

    Objective findings (non-supporting/absent):

    –

    Differential #4 (Optional)

    Differential #5 (Optional)

    Final Diagnosis (ONE ONLY)
    Final Diagnosis: [Write the final diagnosis here]

    Final Problem Statement Template
    [Initials/Name], [Age], presents with [chief complaint] characterized by [positive subjective
    findings] and denies [negative subjective findings]. Physical exam reveals [positive objective
    findings] with absence of [negative objective findings]. Pertinent history includes [relevant PMH,
    family history, or risk factors]. The overall clinical picture is most consistent with [final diagnosis].

    Reference Requirements
    You must include 3–5 peer-reviewed journal references (published within the last 5 years) to
    support diagnostic reasoning in the Assessment. References must:
    – Align with the differential diagnoses and/or final diagnosis.

    – Support pathophysiology, clinical presentation, or diagnostic criteria.
    – Be cited in APA 7th edition format.
    – Not include textbooks, blogs, or patient-education websites.

    Example acceptable sources:
    – Peer-reviewed journal articles
    – Clinical practice guidelines (ACC/AHA, ADA, IDSA, AAP, USPSTF)
    – Systematic reviews or meta-analyses

    **## NURS_6512_PhysicalExamination_ReferenceSheet.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Physical Examination Reference Sheet
    NURS 6512 – Advanced Health Assessment & Diagnostic Reasoning

    Purpose: To guide students in documenting objective findings only during the physical
    examination.

    REMINDER: PHYSICAL EXAM = OBJECTIVE DATA ONLY
    This section should include only what you observe, measure, or assess — not what the patient
    reports. Do NOT include subjective statements or history.

    ✅ Correct (Objective): “Lungs clear to auscultation bilaterally; no wheezes, rales, or rhonchi.”

    ❌ Incorrect (Subjective): “Patient reports shortness of breath and chest tightness.”

    GENERAL FORMAT FOR PHYSICAL EXAM DOCUMENTATION
    • General: Appearance, distress, hygiene, orientation
    • Skin: Color, temperature, turgor, lesions, rashes
    • Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic
    • Eyes: PERRLA, EOMI, conjunctiva clear
    • Ears: TM intact, no erythema or effusion
    • Nose: Mucosa pink, septum midline, no discharge
    • Mouth/Throat: Mucosa moist, no erythema or exudate
    • Neck: Supple, no lymphadenopathy, thyroid non-enlarged
    • Cardiac: RRR, no murmurs, rubs, or gallops
    • Lungs: CTA bilaterally, no wheezes, rales, or rhonchi
    • Abdomen: Contour, bowel sounds, tenderness, organomegaly
    • GU: External genitalia, discharge, lesions, CVA tenderness (as indicated)
    • Musculoskeletal: ROM, strength, gait, deformities, tenderness
    • Lower Extremities: Edema, pulses, color, warmth, capillary refill, sensation
    • Neuro: CN II–XII grossly intact, strength and sensation symmetrical

    Chief Complaint, Must-Not-Miss Diagnoses, and Systems to Examine
    Identify high-priority conditions and focus your exam to rule them out.

    Chief Complaint Must-Not-Miss Diagnoses Systems to Examine

    Cough or Shortness of
    Breath

    Pneumonia, Pulmonary
    embolism, Myocardial
    infarction, Heart failure,
    Pneumothorax

    Respiratory, Cardiac, ENT,
    Skin (cyanosis), Lower
    Extremities (edema/DVT
    signs)

    Abdominal Pain Appendicitis, Bowel
    obstruction, Perforated

    Abdomen, GU, Cardiac,
    Respiratory, Skin

    ulcer, Ectopic pregnancy,
    Cholecystitis, Pancreatitis

    (jaundice), Neuro (pain
    localization)

    Headache Subarachnoid hemorrhage,
    Meningitis, Temporal
    arteritis, Intracranial mass,
    Hypertensive emergency,
    CVA (stroke)

    Neuro, HEENT, Neck, Eyes
    (fundoscopic), Cardiac (BP),
    Skin (rash/meningitis)

    Back Pain Cauda equina syndrome,
    Epidural abscess, Spinal
    fracture, Pyelonephritis,
    Abdominal aortic aneurysm
    (AAA)

    Musculoskeletal, Neuro,
    Abdomen, GU (CVA
    tenderness), Skin
    (infection)

    UTI Symptoms Pyelonephritis, Urosepsis,
    Pregnancy, Obstructive
    uropathy

    Abdomen, GU, CVA
    tenderness, Skin (fever
    signs), Neuro (confusion in
    elderly)

    Sore Throat Peritonsillar abscess,
    Epiglottitis, Mononucleosis,
    Streptococcal pharyngitis

    HEENT, Lymphatic, Neck,
    Cardiac, Respiratory
    (airway), Skin
    (rash/scarlatina)

    Rash Cellulitis, Meningococcemia,
    Stevens-Johnson syndrome,
    Drug reaction, Anaphylaxis

    Skin, Lymphatic, HEENT
    (mucosal lesions),
    Respiratory (distress),
    Cardiac (shock signs)

    Extremity/Joint Pain DVT, Septic joint, Fracture,
    Cellulitis, Compartment
    syndrome

    Musculoskeletal, Neuro,
    Lower Extremities (pulses,
    edema, warmth, sensation),
    Skin

    DOCUMENTATION TIP
    • Use head-to-toe format only for comprehensive exams (annuals, new patient, baseline).
    • Use focused format for problem-based visits.
    • Objective findings should align with your assessment and must-not-miss differential diagnoses.

    **## NURS_6512_ComprehensiveHealthHistory_ReferenceSheet1.pdf**

    NURS 6512: Comprehensive Health History Reference Sheet

    ⚠ Reminder: The health history includes **subjective data only** — information
    provided by the patient about their symptoms, perceptions, and experiences.
    Objective findings belong in the physical exam section.

    Chief Complaint (CC)

    • State the patient’s main reason for visit — concise and focused.
    • Use the patient’s own words in quotes (1–2 words or one short sentence).
    • Example: “Sore throat for two days.” or “Shortness of breath.”

    History of Present Illness (HPI) – OLDCARTS + Pertinent History

    • Use OLDCARTS to gather data, then synthesize into a cohesive paragraph written
    in complete sentences.
    • Avoid bullet points. Tell the story of the symptom(s) using the data you collected.
    • O – Onset: When did it start?
    • L – Location: Where is it? Does it radiate?
    • D – Duration: Constant or intermittent?
    • C – Character: Describe the quality (sharp, dull, throbbing).
    • A – Aggravating factors: What makes it worse?
    • R – Relieving factors: What makes it better?
    • T – Timing: Pattern, frequency, time of day.
    • S – Severity: 0–10 pain scale or functional impact.
    • Include associated symptoms and pertinent negatives (important symptoms the
    patient denies).
    • Incorporate pertinent history such as recent illness, exposures, travel, medications
    tried, previous episodes, or related chronic conditions.
    • Example: The HPI should read as a full paragraph that flows logically and reflects
    critical thinking — not as a list of OLDCARTS items.

    Past Medical History (PMH)

    • Chronic illnesses (HTN, DM, asthma, etc.)
    • Childhood illnesses (if relevant)
    • Hospitalizations and psychiatric history

    Surgical History (PSH)

    • List all surgeries/procedures with year, indication, and complications

    Medications

    • List all: prescription, OTC, herbal, and supplements
    • Include name, dose, route, frequency, indication
    • Note adherence and side effects

    Allergies

    • Drug, food, environmental — include reaction type (rash, anaphylaxis, etc.)
    • Document tolerated alternatives if known

    Preventive Health

    • Immunizations: Flu, COVID-19, Tdap, shingles, pneumococcal
    • Screenings: Pap, mammogram, colonoscopy, lipid, glucose, DEXA
    • Risk factors: Diet, exercise, safety, sexual health, sleep, stress, dental, vision

    Social History

    • Tobacco: Type, amount, duration, quit attempts
    • Alcohol: Type, frequency, quantity (CAGE if indicated)
    • Substance use: Illicit or prescription misuse
    • Occupation: Exposures, stress, satisfaction
    • Living situation & support system
    • Safety: IPV, firearms, seatbelt use
    • Social Determinants of Health (SDOH): Housing, food, transport, access, finances

    Review of Systems (ROS)

    These are subjective symptoms that the patient reports. No objective exam findings
    should be included here.

    • General: Fever, chills, weight change, fatigue
    • Skin: Rashes, lesions, itching
    • HEENT: Vision, hearing, congestion, sore throat
    • Cardiac: Chest pain, palpitations, edema
    • Respiratory: Cough, SOB, wheezing
    • GI: N/V/D, constipation, pain, appetite
    • GU: Dysuria, frequency, hematuria
    • MSK: Joint pain, stiffness, weakness
    • Neuro: Headache, dizziness, numbness, seizures
    • Psych: Mood, anxiety, sleep
    • Endo: Heat/cold intolerance, polyuria/polydipsia
    • Heme: Easy bruising/bleeding

    **## NURS_6512_M3AS2_Assignment_Template.docx**

    **NURS 6512**

    **Week 7 Assignment Template**

    **Comprehensive Health History, Physical Examination, and Assessment Template**

    **Part I: Comprehensive Health History (Subjective Data Only)**

    **Subjective Data**

    Chief Complaint (CC):

    History of Present Illness (HPI):

    Past Medical History (PMH):

    Surgical History (PSH):

    Medications:

    Allergies:

    Preventive Health:

    Social History:

    **Review of Systems (ROS) (Subjective Data Only – Patient-Reported Symptoms):**

    General:

    Skin:

    HEENT:

    Cardiac:

    Respiratory:

    Gastrointestinal (GI):

    Genitourinary (GU):

    Musculoskeletal (MSK):

    Neurologic:

    Psychiatric:

    Endocrine:

    Hematologic/Lymphatic/Immune:

    **Part II: Focused Physical Examination (Objective Data Only)**

    **Physical Examination: Objective Data Only (Do NOT include subjective statements):**

    General:

    Skin:

    Head:

    Eyes:

    Ears:

    Nose:

    Mouth/Throat:

    Neck:

    Cardiac:

    Lungs:

    Abdomen:

    Genitourinary (GU):

    Musculoskeletal:

    Lower Extremities:

    Neurologic:

    **Part III: Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning**

    **Part III, Section 1: Three Differential Diagnoses**

    **Directions:** Using the template below, for each differential diagnosis, provide pathophysiologic explanation, identify pertinent positives, identify pertinent negatives, explain why it is ruled in or ruled out.

    **Differential Diagnosis #1:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Differential Diagnosis #2:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Differential Diagnosis #3:**

    Condition:

    Rationale:

    Pertinent positives and negatives:

    **Part III, Section 2: One Primary Diagnosis**

    **Directions:** Indicate your final diagnosis (
    **ONE** ONLY). Include your diagnostic reasoning with rationale: provide clear clinical justification, correlate subjective and objective findings, and explain why competing diagnoses are less likely.

    **Part III, Section 3: Final Problem Statement**

    **Directions:** Use the template below to write a final, synthesized problem statement.

    [Initials/Name], [Age], presents with [chief complaint] characterized by [positive subjective findings] and denies [negative subjective findings]. Physical exam reveals [positive objective findings] with absence of [negative objective findings]. Pertinent history includes [relevant PMH, family history, or risk factors]. The overall clinical picture is most consistent with [final diagnosis].

    **Part IV: Reflection**

    This reflection is designed to strengthen your clinical reasoning and your ability to clearly separate subjective and objective data in documentation.

    **Part IV, Section 1: Subjective vs. Objective Distinction**

    1. Identify one example in your documentation where it was challenging to separate subjective and objective data.

    2. Explain how you ensured patient-reported symptoms remained in the history/ROS and observable findings remained in the physical exam.

    3. Briefly explain why this distinction is important for diagnostic accuracy.

    **Part IV, Section 2: Diagnostic Reasoning**

    1. Identify one differential diagnosis you strongly considered but ultimately ruled out.

    2. List
    **two** key findings (pertinent positives or negatives) that helped you rule it out.

    3. State what finding most strongly supported your final diagnosis.

    **References**

    List 3–5 peer-reviewed references, less than 5 Years Old. Cite all sources in APA format.

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] week 7 case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Complete this case study making sure all instructions and the rubric are followed. Templates needed are also attached. – [\ \ NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurs-6512-assessment-referencesheet-pdf-10572491 "NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf") – […

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Complete this case study making sure all instructions and the rubric are followed. Templates needed are also attached.

    – [\
    \
    NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurs-6512-assessment-referencesheet-pdf-10572491 "NURS_6512_Assessment_ReferenceSheet.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    NURS_6512_ComprehensiveHealthHistory_ReferenceSheet.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurs-6512-comprehensivehealthhistory-referencesheet-pdf-10572493 "NURS_6512_ComprehensiveHealthHistory_ReferenceSheet.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    NURS_6512_M3AS2_Assignment_Template.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurs-6512-m3as2-assignment-template-docx-10572495 "NURS_6512_M3AS2_Assignment_Template.docx")
    – [\
    \
    NURS_6512_PhysicalExamination_ReferenceSheet.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurs-6512-physicalexamination-referencesheet-pdf-10572497 "NURS_6512_PhysicalExamination_ReferenceSheet.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    WEEK7ASSIGNMENT.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week7assignment-docx-10572517 "WEEK7ASSIGNMENT.docx")

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## USW1_NURS_6052_MatrixWorksheet_Template.doc – ## EBPinstructionModul4.docx **## USW1_NURS_6052_MatrixWorksheet_Template.doc** [removed] **## EBPinstructionModul4.docx** Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## USW1_NURS_6052_MatrixWorksheet_Template.doc

    – ## EBPinstructionModul4.docx

    **## USW1_NURS_6052_MatrixWorksheet_Template.doc**

    [removed]

    **## EBPinstructionModul4.docx**

    Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

    Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

    In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

    Resources

    Learning Resources

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/225914/pages/module-4-learning-resources?module_item_id=9723124)

    · Schmidt, N. A. & Brown, J. M. (2025).
    _Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

    · Chapter 13, “Quantitative Data Considerations” (pp. 397-445)

    · Chapter 13 will help students understand descriptive and inferential statistics as well as population and sample statistics.

    ·  Chapter 14, “What do the Qualitative Data Mean?”  (pp. 446-471)

    · Chapter 14 will help students understand how qualitative data is determined, evaluated and used in research and EBP.

    · Chapter 15, “Appraising Evidence to Determine Best Practice” (pp 472-495)

    · Chapter 15 will help students understand the importance of critically appraising evidence and using the ranking system based on the hierarchy of evidence.

    · Oranga, J., Matere, A., & Njurai, E. (2025).
    [The mixed methods research approach: An overviewLinks to an external site.](https://www.pmpjournal.org/index.php/pmp/article/view/445). Postmodernism Problems, 15(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2501084

    ·
    [Document: Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/225914/files/19507001?wrap=1)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

    · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

    · Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

    **The Assignment** (Evidence-Based Project)

    **Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research**

    Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

    **Note**: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

    **Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research**

    Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

    **Submit** Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

    **NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent** The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood** The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsFair** The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsPoor** The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing. | 35 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## EBPinstructionModul4.docx**

    Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

    Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

    In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

    Resources

    Learning Resources

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/225914/pages/module-4-learning-resources?module_item_id=9723124)

    · Schmidt, N. A. & Brown, J. M. (2025).
    _Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

    · Chapter 13, “Quantitative Data Considerations” (pp. 397-445)

    · Chapter 13 will help students understand descriptive and inferential statistics as well as population and sample statistics.

    ·  Chapter 14, “What do the Qualitative Data Mean?”  (pp. 446-471)

    · Chapter 14 will help students understand how qualitative data is determined, evaluated and used in research and EBP.

    · Chapter 15, “Appraising Evidence to Determine Best Practice” (pp 472-495)

    · Chapter 15 will help students understand the importance of critically appraising evidence and using the ranking system based on the hierarchy of evidence.

    · Oranga, J., Matere, A., & Njurai, E. (2025).
    [The mixed methods research approach: An overviewLinks to an external site.](https://www.pmpjournal.org/index.php/pmp/article/view/445). Postmodernism Problems, 15(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2501084

    ·
    [Document: Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/225914/files/19507001?wrap=1)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

    · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

    · Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

    **The Assignment** (Evidence-Based Project)

    **Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research**

    Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

    **Note**: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

    **Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research**

    Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

    **Submit** Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

    **NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent** The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood** The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsFair** The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsPoor** The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing. | 35 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## USW1_NURS_6052_MatrixWorksheet_Template.doc**

    [removed]

    **## EBPinstructionModul4.docx**

    Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

    Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

    In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

    Resources

    Learning Resources

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/225914/pages/module-4-learning-resources?module_item_id=9723124)

    · Schmidt, N. A. & Brown, J. M. (2025).
    _Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

    · Chapter 13, “Quantitative Data Considerations” (pp. 397-445)

    · Chapter 13 will help students understand descriptive and inferential statistics as well as population and sample statistics.

    ·  Chapter 14, “What do the Qualitative Data Mean?”  (pp. 446-471)

    · Chapter 14 will help students understand how qualitative data is determined, evaluated and used in research and EBP.

    · Chapter 15, “Appraising Evidence to Determine Best Practice” (pp 472-495)

    · Chapter 15 will help students understand the importance of critically appraising evidence and using the ranking system based on the hierarchy of evidence.

    · Oranga, J., Matere, A., & Njurai, E. (2025).
    [The mixed methods research approach: An overviewLinks to an external site.](https://www.pmpjournal.org/index.php/pmp/article/view/445). Postmodernism Problems, 15(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2501084

    ·
    [Document: Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/225914/files/19507001?wrap=1)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

    · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

    · Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

    **The Assignment** (Evidence-Based Project)

    **Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research**

    Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

    **Note**: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

    **Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research**

    Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

    **Submit** Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

    **NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent** The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood** The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsFair** The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsPoor** The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing. | 35 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## USW1_NURS_6052_MatrixWorksheet_Template.doc**

    [removed]

    **## EBPinstructionModul4.docx**

    Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

    Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

    In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

    Resources

    Learning Resources

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/225914/pages/module-4-learning-resources?module_item_id=9723124)

    · Schmidt, N. A. & Brown, J. M. (2025).
    _Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

    · Chapter 13, “Quantitative Data Considerations” (pp. 397-445)

    · Chapter 13 will help students understand descriptive and inferential statistics as well as population and sample statistics.

    ·  Chapter 14, “What do the Qualitative Data Mean?”  (pp. 446-471)

    · Chapter 14 will help students understand how qualitative data is determined, evaluated and used in research and EBP.

    · Chapter 15, “Appraising Evidence to Determine Best Practice” (pp 472-495)

    · Chapter 15 will help students understand the importance of critically appraising evidence and using the ranking system based on the hierarchy of evidence.

    · Oranga, J., Matere, A., & Njurai, E. (2025).
    [The mixed methods research approach: An overviewLinks to an external site.](https://www.pmpjournal.org/index.php/pmp/article/view/445). Postmodernism Problems, 15(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2501084

    ·
    [Document: Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/225914/files/19507001?wrap=1)

    **To Prepare:**

    · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

    · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

    · Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

    **The Assignment** (Evidence-Based Project)

    **Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research**

    Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

    **Note**: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

    **Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research**

    Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

    **Submit** Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

    **NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent** The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood** The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsFair** The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsPoor** The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing. | 35 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Nursing in Healthcare-C

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing in Healthcare-C.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] discussion 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This Week’s Discussion asks you to consider how the Walden mission and vision as well as the College of Nursing's mission and vision apply to your professional and academic goals. You will also begin to identify individuals and teams who can help you along the way as you begin designing the “bluepri…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This Week’s Discussion asks you to consider how the Walden mission and vision as well as the College of Nursing's mission and vision apply to your professional and academic goals. You will also begin to identify individuals and teams who can help you along the way as you begin designing the “blueprint”—your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan—that will guide you toward your own vision for academic and professional success. Finally, you will explain the importance of networking and how it can help you achieve your professional and academic goals.

    add references, 1 page long

  • [Solved] discussion 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    his Week’s Discussion asks you to consider how the Walden mission and vision as well as the College of Nursing's mission and vision apply to your professional and academic goals. You will also begin to identify individuals and teams who can help you along the way as you begin designing the “blueprin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    his Week’s Discussion asks you to consider how the Walden mission and vision as well as the College of Nursing's mission and vision apply to your professional and academic goals. You will also begin to identify individuals and teams who can help you along the way as you begin designing the “blueprint”—your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan—that will guide you toward your own vision for academic and professional success. Finally, you will explain the importance of networking and how it can help you achieve your professional and academic goals.

  • [Solved] New assigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering New assigment.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] 6053 – MOD 4 DISCUSSION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    How healthy is your workplace? You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    How healthy is your workplace?

    You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.

    There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.