My Blog

Category: Psychology

  • [Solved] psych

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## MapsychPartAB.docx **## MapsychPartAB.docx** **This assignment comes with 2 parts, parts A and B. Failure to do both will result in a significant drop in the grade.** **Part A** For each research question below, write a hypothesis, define the best type of research (d…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## MapsychPartAB.docx

    **## MapsychPartAB.docx**

    **This assignment comes with 2 parts, parts A and B. Failure to do both will result in a significant drop in the grade.**

    **Part A**

    For each research question below, write a hypothesis, define the best type of research (descriptive, correlational, or experiment) to use, and explain how you would design the necessary study. Your explanation needs to be thorough enough to demonstrate understanding of the research methods discussed in this module's readings. The first one has been done for you as an example.

    Ex: Understanding the relationship between amount of sleep and grades on a 12th grade math test

    · The more a person sleeps, the better his/her grade will be on a math test

    · Correlational study

    · I would get a random sample by choosing every 5th person to walk out of the math classroom after the test. I would hand those people a survey asking them how long they had slept the night before and their grade on the math test.

    1.     Determining if drinking alcohol causes hallucinations

    2.     Describing a day in the life of a person in a mental health hospital

    3.     Understanding what it’s like to be the mom of octuplets (eight babies born from a single pregnancy)

    4.     Determining if the amount of coffee consumed causes an affect on a person’s mood

    5.     Deciding if there is any relationship between hair color and number of dates per month

    **Part B**

    **Approaches to Psychology**

    **Instructions**

    **Step 1:** Review the following seven (7) approaches to psychology

    **Choose FIVE (5) of these approaches and give an example of how each approach relates to you. You will give one example for each approach.**

    Biological – focusing on the body, especially the brain and the nervous system

    Behavioral – focusing on behavioral responses (doing or not doing things)

    Psychodynamic – focusing on unconscious thought and conflict between biological drives, society's demands, and childhood/family experiences

    Humanistic – focusing on a person's capacity for positive growth and freedom to choose one's destiny

    Cognitive – focusing on mental processes (i.e., thinking, memory, attention, problem solving)

    Evolutionary – focusing on evolving ideas, such as adapting, reproduction, natural selection, and survival as a part of human behavior

    Sociocultural – focusing on ways in which social and cultural environments influence behavior

    **## MapsychPartAB.docx**

    **This assignment comes with 2 parts, parts A and B. Failure to do both will result in a significant drop in the grade.**

    **Part A**

    For each research question below, write a hypothesis, define the best type of research (descriptive, correlational, or experiment) to use, and explain how you would design the necessary study. Your explanation needs to be thorough enough to demonstrate understanding of the research methods discussed in this module's readings. The first one has been done for you as an example.

    Ex: Understanding the relationship between amount of sleep and grades on a 12th grade math test

    · The more a person sleeps, the better his/her grade will be on a math test

    · Correlational study

    · I would get a random sample by choosing every 5th person to walk out of the math classroom after the test. I would hand those people a survey asking them how long they had slept the night before and their grade on the math test.

    1.     Determining if drinking alcohol causes hallucinations

    2.     Describing a day in the life of a person in a mental health hospital

    3.     Understanding what it’s like to be the mom of octuplets (eight babies born from a single pregnancy)

    4.     Determining if the amount of coffee consumed causes an affect on a person’s mood

    5.     Deciding if there is any relationship between hair color and number of dates per month

    **Part B**

    **Approaches to Psychology**

    **Instructions**

    **Step 1:** Review the following seven (7) approaches to psychology

    **Choose FIVE (5) of these approaches and give an example of how each approach relates to you. You will give one example for each approach.**

    Biological – focusing on the body, especially the brain and the nervous system

    Behavioral – focusing on behavioral responses (doing or not doing things)

    Psychodynamic – focusing on unconscious thought and conflict between biological drives, society's demands, and childhood/family experiences

    Humanistic – focusing on a person's capacity for positive growth and freedom to choose one's destiny

    Cognitive – focusing on mental processes (i.e., thinking, memory, attention, problem solving)

    Evolutionary – focusing on evolving ideas, such as adapting, reproduction, natural selection, and survival as a part of human behavior

    Sociocultural – focusing on ways in which social and cultural environments influence behavior

  • [Solved] Article Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Help with assignment – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## articlereviewintructions.docx – SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf – OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf **## articlereviewintructions.docx** You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the arti…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Help with assignment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## articlereviewintructions.docx

    – SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf
    – OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf

    **## articlereviewintructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10174219)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10174221)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10174221)

    **## articlereviewintructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10174219)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10174221)

    **## articlereviewintructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10174219)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10174221)

  • [Solved] Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ IMG_3375.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3375-png "IMG_3375.png") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    IMG_3375.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3375-png "IMG_3375.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Article Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Can someone help me complete this review – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx – SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF – OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf **## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx** ## Article Review Instructions: Please Read Care…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Can someone help me complete this review

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx

    – SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF
    – OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx**

    ## Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    ![Previous item](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/article-review-20880325) Page 4 of 4

    Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **image1.gif**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10174417)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10174419)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10174419)

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx**

    ## Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    ![Previous item](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/article-review-20880325) Page 4 of 4

    Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **image1.gif**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10174417)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10174419)

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx**

    ## Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    ![Previous item](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/article-review-20880325) Page 4 of 4

    Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **image1.gif**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10174417)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10174419)

  • [Solved] aba

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering aba.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] aba

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering aba.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Article review 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Article2.docx – EBSCO-FullText-01_31_2025.pdf **## Article2.docx** Review a professional resource ( peer-reviewed journal or text ) on counseling after a School Shooting. The review must provide the following (hummm…these look like headings in a paper to me; hint…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Article2.docx

    – EBSCO-FullText-01_31_2025.pdf

    **## Article2.docx**

    Review a professional resource ( peer-reviewed journal or text ) on counseling after a School Shooting.

    The review must provide the following (hummm…these look like headings in a paper to me; hint, hint):

    1. Source reference in APA 7th reference style,
    1b.  Citations as necessary (this is only an issue if you reference other's article information in your summary, otherwise it is assumed that the summary is strictly dealing with the single article / text referenced).

    2. Summarize the article well,

    3. Note strengths and weaknesses of the article,

    4. and the Benefit / Negative (pro/con) to the student as a counseling professional.

    There is no page limit. Cover all of the required points well / thoroughly and all will go well. I prefer if you can do so with efficiency and brevity, perhaps even eloquence. But I have no minimum or maximum limit of pages (that is an archaic structure that limits self-expression).

    Upload a document of your summary in .doc or .docx format

    As we are using TurnItIn to combat AI and plagiarism, you are recommended to turn in your paper early, return to the assignment after TurnItIn has reviewed your submission, and then use the TurnItin analysis to improve your paper.

    **EBSCO-FullText-01_31_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-01-31-2025-pdf)

    **EBSCO-FullText-01_31_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-01-31-2025-pdf)

    **## Article2.docx**

    Review a professional resource ( peer-reviewed journal or text ) on counseling after a School Shooting.

    The review must provide the following (hummm…these look like headings in a paper to me; hint, hint):

    1. Source reference in APA 7th reference style,
    1b.  Citations as necessary (this is only an issue if you reference other's article information in your summary, otherwise it is assumed that the summary is strictly dealing with the single article / text referenced).

    2. Summarize the article well,

    3. Note strengths and weaknesses of the article,

    4. and the Benefit / Negative (pro/con) to the student as a counseling professional.

    There is no page limit. Cover all of the required points well / thoroughly and all will go well. I prefer if you can do so with efficiency and brevity, perhaps even eloquence. But I have no minimum or maximum limit of pages (that is an archaic structure that limits self-expression).

    Upload a document of your summary in .doc or .docx format

    As we are using TurnItIn to combat AI and plagiarism, you are recommended to turn in your paper early, return to the assignment after TurnItIn has reviewed your submission, and then use the TurnItin analysis to improve your paper.

    **EBSCO-FullText-01_31_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-01-31-2025-pdf)

    **## Article2.docx**

    Review a professional resource ( peer-reviewed journal or text ) on counseling after a School Shooting.

    The review must provide the following (hummm…these look like headings in a paper to me; hint, hint):

    1. Source reference in APA 7th reference style,
    1b.  Citations as necessary (this is only an issue if you reference other's article information in your summary, otherwise it is assumed that the summary is strictly dealing with the single article / text referenced).

    2. Summarize the article well,

    3. Note strengths and weaknesses of the article,

    4. and the Benefit / Negative (pro/con) to the student as a counseling professional.

    There is no page limit. Cover all of the required points well / thoroughly and all will go well. I prefer if you can do so with efficiency and brevity, perhaps even eloquence. But I have no minimum or maximum limit of pages (that is an archaic structure that limits self-expression).

    Upload a document of your summary in .doc or .docx format

    As we are using TurnItIn to combat AI and plagiarism, you are recommended to turn in your paper early, return to the assignment after TurnItIn has reviewed your submission, and then use the TurnItin analysis to improve your paper.

    **EBSCO-FullText-01_31_2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-01-31-2025-pdf)

  • [Solved] CLP DISCUSSION 7 REPLIES

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering CLP DISCUSSION 7 REPLIES.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] CLP DISCUSSION 7 INITIAL POST

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering CLP DISCUSSION 7 INITIAL POST.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] see below

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## LearningResources.pdf **## LearningResources.pdf** LEARNING RESOURCES Required Resources APA STYLE American Psychological Association. (2019, October). About APA style (https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style) . https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style Walden Univer…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## LearningResources.pdf

    **## LearningResources.pdf**

    LEARNING RESOURCES

    Required Resources

    APA STYLE
    American Psychological Association. (2019, October). About APA style
    (https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style) . https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style
    Walden University. (2021). APA basics checklist
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist
    Note: This interactive tutorial teaches the basics of APA style. It will take you approximately 20
    minutes to complete this tutorial.

    Walden University, LLC. (2021). APA tutorial [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    AVOIDING PLAGIARISM
    Note: You will complete the following two Writing Center plagiarism modules as part of this
    week's Assignment 1.

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding overt plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)
    [Interactive
    media].https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548803
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding passive plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)
    [Interactive
    media]https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548804

    Walden University, LLC. (2023). Incorporating evidence into your writing (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html) . [Interactive media]. Walden
    University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND ORGANIZATION
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Grammarly: Overview
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly
    Walden University. (2021). Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL plan)
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    WEEK 2 LEARNING ACTIVITY—USING CRITICAL THINKING
    STRATEGIES TO IDENTIFY SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND
    COGNITIVE BIAS

    Note: Review this interactive media first presented in Week 2.
    Walden University, LLC. (2021). Using critical thinking strategies to identify scientific
    evidence and cognitive bias [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    **## LearningResources.pdf**

    LEARNING RESOURCES

    Required Resources

    APA STYLE
    American Psychological Association. (2019, October). About APA style
    (https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style) . https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style
    Walden University. (2021). APA basics checklist
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist
    Note: This interactive tutorial teaches the basics of APA style. It will take you approximately 20
    minutes to complete this tutorial.

    Walden University, LLC. (2021). APA tutorial [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    AVOIDING PLAGIARISM
    Note: You will complete the following two Writing Center plagiarism modules as part of this
    week's Assignment 1.

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding overt plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)
    [Interactive
    media].https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548803
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding passive plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)
    [Interactive
    media]https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548804

    Walden University, LLC. (2023). Incorporating evidence into your writing (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html) . [Interactive media]. Walden
    University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND ORGANIZATION
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Grammarly: Overview
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly
    Walden University. (2021). Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL plan)
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    WEEK 2 LEARNING ACTIVITY—USING CRITICAL THINKING
    STRATEGIES TO IDENTIFY SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND
    COGNITIVE BIAS

    Note: Review this interactive media first presented in Week 2.
    Walden University, LLC. (2021). Using critical thinking strategies to identify scientific
    evidence and cognitive bias [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)