Tag: Care Plans

  • [Solved] Contraception / IVF

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    After studying the course materials located on [Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/44227/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources "Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources") page, answer the following: 01. Name and explain the levels of human sexual int…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    After studying the course materials located on [Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/44227/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources "Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources") page, answer the following:

    01. Name and explain the levels of human sexual intercourse.
    02. Difference between reproduction and procreation.
    03. What are the two dimensions of intimacy?
    04. Contraception:
    – What is it?
    – What is the intention of contraception?
    – Describe the three types of artificial contraception.
    – Risks / Side effects
    – Bioethical analysis and unfair dynamics of artificial contraception.
    05. Non-Therapeutic sterilization; bioethical analysis
    06. Principle of double effect; explain
    07. Bioethical analysis of:
    – Ectopic pregnancy
    – Cancerous reproductive system with pregnancy
    08. In Vitro Fertilization(IVF):
    – Process
    – Bioethical analysis of IVF
    09. Bioethical analysis of “to have a child”
    10. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #: 40, 41, 42, 48, 52, 53.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
    – If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style. Refer to your syllabus for further detail or contact your instructor.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Contraception / IVF

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    After studying the course materials located on [Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/44227/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources "Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources") page, answer the following: 01. Name and explain the levels of human sexual int…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    After studying the course materials located on [Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/44227/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources "Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources") page, answer the following:

    01. Name and explain the levels of human sexual intercourse.
    02. Difference between reproduction and procreation.
    03. What are the two dimensions of intimacy?
    04. Contraception:
    – What is it?
    – What is the intention of contraception?
    – Describe the three types of artificial contraception.

    – Risks / Side effects
    – Bioethical analysis and unfair dynamics of artificial contraception.
    05. Non-Therapeutic sterilization; bioethical analysis
    06. Principle of double effect; explain
    07. Bioethical analysis of:
    – Ectopic pregnancy
    – Cancerous reproductive system with pregnancy
    08. In Vitro Fertilization(IVF):
    – Process
    – Bioethical analysis of IVF
    09. Bioethical analysis of “to have a child”
    10. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #: 40, 41, 42, 48, 52, 53.

    – The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
    – If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style. Refer to your syllabus for further detail or contact your instructor.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Contraceptive & IVF Forum

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – You are not required to initiate a thread, however, everyone must post at least once . There is no minimum or maximum word count. You will be graded on the relevance of your post to the topic and the application of the concepts. – When responding to your peers, you should extend, refute/correct, o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – You are not required to initiate a thread, however, everyone must post at least once . There is no minimum or maximum word count. You will be graded on the relevance of your post to the topic and the application of the concepts.
    – When responding to your peers, you should extend, refute/correct, or add additional nuance to their posts.
    – All replies must be constructive and follow proper netiquette. [Click here to go to the Academic Continuity Guide for Students and read the Course Communication Guidelines (Netiquette)Links to an external site.](https://www.stu.edu/academic-continuity-guide-for-students/).

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion Post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] writing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (5)** – ## Home-JosieKingFoundation.pdf – ## Competencies_QSEN.pdf – ## Donabedian.pdf – NursesHealthStudy_.pdf – ArticleonArtificialintelligency.pdf **## Home-JosieKingFoundation.pdf** About Josie King Foundation On February 22, 2001, eighteen-month-old Josie King died from …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (5)**

    – ## Home-JosieKingFoundation.pdf

    – ## Competencies_QSEN.pdf

    – ## Donabedian.pdf

    – NursesHealthStudy_.pdf
    – ArticleonArtificialintelligency.pdf

    **## Home-JosieKingFoundation.pdf**

    About Josie King Foundation
    On February 22, 2001, eighteen-month-old Josie King died from medical errors.

    More than 250,000 people die every year from medical errors, making it the third leading cause of

    death in the United States.

    The Josie King Foundation’s mission is to prevent patients from dying or being harmed by medical

    errors. By uniting healthcare providers and consumers, and funding innovative safety programs, we

    hope to create a culture of patient safety, together.

    U aa

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    JKF News & Events
    Josie King Hero Award: fifth limited edition is here

    Thanks to so many amazing Josie King heroes in hospitals around the country, the first through

    fourth limited editions of the Josie King Hero Award artwork have sold out. We are pleased to
    announce the launch of the fifth limited edition of the Josie King Hero Award. We decided to use the

    foundation’s colors of brown, green, and white in this new layout. These colors symbolize safety,

    health, security, protection, and support which represent some of our core messages. Like previous

    editions, each giclee watercolor print is set in a simple clear block frame. Abstract copy flows across

    the washed background – and a thank you message from the Josie King Foundation to the hero
    recipient is beautifully printed on the back.

    To learn more click here

    [https://josieking.org/jkf-tools/josie-king-hero-award](https://josieking.org/jkf-tools/josie-king-hero-award)

    Patient Safety 24 years since Josie King died: How far have we come?

    Opportunities and challenges were recognized 24 years ago at Hopkins when Josie died. No Room

    for Error, an article just released in a special patient safety issue of Dome, a Johns Hopkins
    publication marks the fifteen-year anniversary of Josie’s death and the progress and growth in

    patient safety ever since.

    To read the article, click here.

    [https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error](https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error)

    [https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error](https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error)

    15 years later

    MedStar Health created a new Community HeRO Award. Sorrel was recognized at the MedStar

    Health Annual HeRO Luncheon.

    To read more click here

    Upcoming Speaking Engagements

    February 27 – 2025 Virginia Patient Safety Summit – Keynote Speaker – Virtual

    [https://educatetheyoung.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/sorrel-king-recognized-at-medstar-health-hero-luncheon/](https://educatetheyoung.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/sorrel-king-recognized-at-medstar-health-hero-luncheon/)

    Josie King Foundation creating a culture of patient safety, together | info@josieking.org

     

    Josie’s Story, written by Sorrel King, is used as an educational tool in the healthcare industry.

    A memoir about Josie, the medical errors that led to her death, the family’s struggles to deal with

    their grief, Sorrel’s foray into the health care industry as a patient safety advocate, and the safety
    improvements that have come about in Josie’s memory.

    More about Josie’s Story

    JKF is so happy that Josie’s Story has reached Japan. Thank you to our friends at Eiji Press, Inc. for

    doing such a great job in helping us bring her message to Japan and its healthcare industry.

    Purchase Japanese copy of Josie’s Story

    [mailto:info@josieking.org](mailto:info@josieking.org)

    [https://www.facebook.com/JosieKingFoundation/](https://www.facebook.com/JosieKingFoundation/)

    [https://twitter.com/JKFfoundation](https://twitter.com/JKFfoundation)

    [https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book](https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book)

    [https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book](https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book)

    [http://eijipress.co.jp/sp/josie/](http://eijipress.co.jp/sp/josie/)

    **## Competencies_QSEN.pdf**

    Search…

    Quality and Safety Education for Nurses

    QSEN HOME ABOUT QSEN ACADEMIA PRACTICE RESOURCES PUBLICATIONS

    Competencies
    Using the Institute of Medicine (2003) competencies for nursing, QSEN faculty have defined pre-licensure and graduate quality and safety
    competencies for nursing and proposed targets for the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be developed in nursing pre-licensure programs for
    each competency.

    Patient-Centered Care
    Teamwork & Collaboration
    Evidence-Based Practice
    Quality Improvement
    Safety
    Informatics

    Led by a national advisory board and distinguished faculty, QSEN pursues strategies to build will and develop effective teaching approaches
    to assure that future graduates develop competencies in patient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, evidence-based practice, quality
    improvement, safety, and informatics.

    Acknowledgments

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following QSEN faculty and Advisory Board members for their contributions to the development
    of the competency definitions and KSAs:

    Paul Batalden, MD, (Dartmouth)
    Geraldine Bednash, PhD, RN, FAAN, (American Association of Colleges of Nursing)
    Jean Blackwell, MLS (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Linda Cronenwett, PhD, RN, FAAN (UNC Chapel Hill)
    Lisa Day, PhD, RN (UC-San Francisco)
    Karen Drenkard, PhD, RN, CNAA, (Inova Health System)
    Carol Durham, EdD(c), MSN, RN, (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Leslie Hall, MD (U Missouri-Columbia)
    Pamela Ironside, PhD, RN, FAAN, (Indiana University)
    Jean Johnson, PhD, RN, FAAN (George Washington University)
    Mary (Polly) Johnson, MSN, RN, FAAN (NC Board of Nursing)
    Maryjoan Ladden, PhD, RN, (Harvard)
    Shirley Moore, PhD, RN, FAAN, (Case Western Reserve University)
    Audrey Nelson, PhD, RN, FAAN (Veterans Administration-Tampa)
    Gwen Sherwood, PhD, RN, FAAN (UNC Chapel Hill)
    Elaine Smith, EdD(c), MBA, MSN, RN, CNAA (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    M. Elaine Tagliareni, EdD, RN (Community College of Philadelphia)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/about-qsen](https://www.qsen.org/about-qsen)

    [https://www.qsen.org/academia](https://www.qsen.org/academia)

    [https://www.qsen.org/post/practice](https://www.qsen.org/post/practice)

    [https://www.qsen.org/post/resources](https://www.qsen.org/post/resources)

    [https://www.qsen.org/publications](https://www.qsen.org/publications)

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following for their contributions to the Spanish translation of the competency definitions:
    Nilda Peragallo-Montano, Dean, School of Nursing (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Claudia Giraldo, Bilingual Executive Assistant to the Dean, School of Nursing (UNC-Chapel Hill)

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Spanish

    QSEN Competencias de Pre-
    Licenciatura, Perspectiva de
    Enfermería, mayo-junio de 2007 y

    Translation provided by Claudia S.
    Lizcano Giraldo, Translator, UNC
    Chapel Hill School of Nursing

    Read More

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Portuguese

    Competências para o ensino sobre
    qualidade e segurança em
    enfermagem (Competências QSEN)

    Translation provided by Juliana
    Santana de Freitas

    Read More

    QSEN SES translated in
    Portuguese

    Instrumento de avaliação
    do estudante quanto
    ao ensino sobre qualidade
    e segurança em enfermagem (QSEN
    SES BR)

    Translation provided by Juliana
    Santana de Freitas

    Read More

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following for their contributions to the Turkish translation of the competency definitions:
    Dr. Öğr. Üye. Merve TARHAN, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümü
    Merve TARHAN, Asst. Prof., Health Sciences Faculty, Department of Nursing

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Turkish

    Translation provided by Dr. Öğr. Üye.
    Merve TARHAN
    Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik
    Bölümü
    Merve TARHAN, Asst. Prof.
    Health Sciences Faculty, Department
    of Nursing

    Read More

    Follow Us QSEN Institutional A�liation

    [https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf](https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf)

    [https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf](https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_fb2f549ac45b4cb7a6733861f3b59f6c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_fb2f549ac45b4cb7a6733861f3b59f6c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_33c685fbcb3745c09a90ef6bb4a6816c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_33c685fbcb3745c09a90ef6bb4a6816c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_39fe75b1260845a6b05ac4bf57faf93c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_39fe75b1260845a6b05ac4bf57faf93c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_288e2029ea514b6899d42999e2fa80a0.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_288e2029ea514b6899d42999e2fa80a0.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    qsen.institute@gmail.com

    © 2022 qsen.org

    Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy  | Accessibility

    Created by iPanda Designs

    [http://www.facebook.com/QSENInstitute](http://www.facebook.com/QSENInstitute)

    [https://twitter.com/QSEN_Institute](https://twitter.com/QSEN_Institute)

    [https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/24791299/](https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/24791299/)

    [https://www.instagram.com/qsen.institute/](https://www.instagram.com/qsen.institute/)

    [mailto:qsen.institute@gmail.com](mailto:qsen.institute@gmail.com)

    [https://nursing.case.edu/](https://nursing.case.edu/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/privacy-policy](https://www.qsen.org/privacy-policy)

    [https://www.qsen.org/cookies-policy](https://www.qsen.org/cookies-policy)

    [https://www.qsen.org/accessibility-policy](https://www.qsen.org/accessibility-policy)

    [https://ipanda.design/](https://ipanda.design/)

    **## Donabedian.pdf**

    PERSPECTIVE

    205

    donabedian’s lasting framework for health care quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    HISTORY OF MEDICINE

    Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality
    John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P., and Howard Markel, M.D., Ph.D.

    Though historians are often
    hesitant to declare any event

    a “first,” one might safely claim
    that the contemporary health care
    quality movement had its “found-
    ing moment” in October 1965.
    Less than 3 months after the
    Medicare and Medicaid programs
    were enacted, the newly created
    Health Services Research Section
    of the U.S. Public Health Service
    convened a meeting in Chicago of
    leaders from many health-related
    fields. These leaders considered
    the influence of social and eco-
    nomic research on public health,
    the organization of community
    health agencies, and the quality
    of health services.

    One of these experts, Avedis
    Donabedian, a professor of med-
    ical care organization at the Uni-
    versity of Michigan School of Pub-
    lic Health, was commissioned to
    review the research on quality
    assessment. His formative work
    was already known to readers of
    the Journal, including a 1963 arti-
    cle on administrative controls in
    medical care.1 When the confer-
    ence papers were published in
    July 1966, Donabedian could not
    have anticipated that his article,
    “Evaluating the Quality of Medi-
    cal Care,”2 would become one of
    the most frequently cited public
    health articles of the next 50
    years. More important, this arti-
    cle became the nucleus of his in-
    fluential body of work on the
    theory and practice of quality as-
    surance and the emerging field of
    health services research (see box).

    As an immigrant and a non-
    practicing physician, Donabedian
    could assess the quality of U.S.
    health care from a distinctive
    perspective. As he would note in
    1998, “I’m a double outsider in
    terms of seeing the value founda-
    tions of the health care system.
    I’m an outsider and, therefore, I
    can see how these ‘natives’ think.”3
    Donabedian was born in 1919 in
    Beirut, Lebanon, to Armenian par-
    ents who had been exiled from
    Ottoman Turkey during the Arme-
    nian genocide. Raised in Ramal-
    lah, Palestine, he followed in his
    father’s path and studied medi-
    cine. As a young physician, he
    directed the faculty and student
    health service of the American
    University in Beirut.

    This experience spawned his

    lifelong interest in the ways in
    which medical care is delivered,
    in organizations ranging from
    small clinics to large health care
    systems. In 1953, Donabedian was
    granted a scholarship to study
    epidemiology and health services
    administration at the Harvard
    School of Public Health, where
    he forged lasting relationships
    with leaders in studying health
    care, and in 1961 he was recruit-
    ed to the University of Michigan.
    For the rest of his career, he
    worked to define and develop
    methods to measure the quality
    of health care, assessing how
    clinical decision making affects
    quality and analyzing the man-
    agement and governance of health
    care systems and resources.

    In his landmark 1966 article,

    Articles
    Evaluating the quality of medical care: 1966. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;44:Suppl:

    166-206. (Reprinted in Milbank Q 2005;83:691-729.)
    Quality, cost, and health: an integrative model. Med Care 1982;20:975-92 (with J.R.

    Wheeler and L. Wyszewianski).
    The epidemiology of quality. Inquiry 1985;22:282-92.
    Twenty years of research on the quality of medical care, 1964-1984. Eval Health Prof

    1985;8:243-65.
    The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988;260:1743-8.
    The end results of health care: Ernest Codman’s contribution to quality assessment

    and beyond. Milbank Q 1989;67:233-56.
    The seven pillars of quality. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:1115-8.
    A quarter-century of work on quality of care at the Institute of Medicine. In: Institute

    of Medicine Council. For the public good: highlights from the Institute of Medi-
    cine, 1970-1995. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1995:53-7.

    Books
    The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health

    Administration Press, 1980.
    The criteria and standards of quality. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1982.
    The methods and findings of quality assessment and monitoring: an illustrated

    analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1985.
    An introduction to quality assurance in health care. New York: Oxford University

    Press, 2002.

    Notable Publications on the Quality of Health Care by Avedis Donabedian.

    PERSPECTIVE

    206

    donabedian’s lasting framework for health care quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    Donabedian proposed using the
    triad of structure, process, and
    outcome to evaluate the quality
    of health care.2 He defined “struc-
    ture” as the settings, qualifica-
    tions of providers, and adminis-
    trative systems through which
    care takes place; “process” as the
    components of care delivered;
    and “outcome” as recovery, resto-
    ration of function, and survival.
    These concepts remain the foun-
    dation of quality assessment to-
    day. Structure has long been
    assessed by means of board cer-
    tification of physicians and Joint
    Commission accreditation of hos-
    pitals. Process and outcome mea-
    sures are now vetted and en-
    dorsed by the National Quality
    Forum and National Committee
    for Quality Assurance, and Medi-
    care publicly reports the perfor-
    mance of hospitals, nursing
    homes, and health plans on such
    measures. Furthermore, board cer-
    tification programs for physicians
    now strive to foster continuous
    learning and monitoring of clini-
    cal performance measures.

    Long before the advent of elec-
    tronic health records or comput-
    erized health care data, Donabe-
    dian’s article also presaged many
    of the challenges that persist in
    current efforts to assess the
    quality of care.2 He underscored
    the difficulties of assessing qual-
    ity on the basis of medical rec-
    ords or direct observation of clini-
    cal encounters. He highlighted
    the importance of representative
    samples and clear measurement
    standards. He emphasized the
    need for valid measures of struc-
    ture and process that could be
    linked to outcomes and for reli-
    able measures of quality that were
    readily reproducible. He called for
    a broader approach to quality

    measurement that extended be-
    yond the technical management
    of illness to incorporate assess-
    ments of prevention, rehabilita-
    tion, coordination, and continu-
    ity of care, the patient–physician
    relationship, economic efficiency,
    and societal values. The current
    focus on value-based payment and
    patient-centered outcomes can be
    traced back to Donabedian’s con-
    ceptual framework.

    This framework provided the
    foundation for an influential re-
    port produced by the Institute of
    Medicine in 1990, entitled Medi-
    care: A Strategy for Quality Assurance.
    Drawing extensively on Donabe-
    dian’s work, the report defined
    quality of care as “the degree to
    which health services for indi-
    viduals and populations increase
    the likelihood of desired health
    outcomes and are consistent with
    current professional knowledge.”
    Also in 1990, Donabedian out-
    lined the “seven pillars of qual-
    ity,” 4 which would be distilled 11
    years later in the Institute of
    Medicine report Crossing the Qual-
    ity Chasm, which highlighted six
    core aims for the 21st-century
    health care system: to deliver
    care that is safe, effective, patient-
    centered, timely, efficient, and
    equitable. Benchmarks related to
    these aims have become com-
    mon metrics in clinics, hospitals,
    and health care organizations
    around the world.

    Donabedian concluded his
    1966 article with an essential
    question and a demand for evi-
    dence: “More often one needs to
    ask, ‘What goes on here?’ rather
    than, ‘What is wrong; and how
    can it be made better?’ This does
    not mean that the researcher dis-
    owns his own values or social
    objectives. It does mean, however,

    that the distinction between val-
    ues, and elements of structure,
    process or outcome, is recog-
    nized and maintained; and that
    both are subjected to equally criti-
    cal study.”

    Donabedian emphasized that
    a focus on metrics is essential.
    He also insisted that physicians
    must recognize that the culture
    and social systems in which they
    practice can enhance or detract
    from the quality of health care.
    Therefore, we believe that Donabe-
    dian would call on health care
    professionals in our current era
    to engage actively in leading and
    shaping the pursuit of high-qual-
    ity care in their organizations
    and society.

    Near the end of his life, Dona-
    bedian was frequently hospital-
    ized for complications of ad-
    vanced prostate cancer. Once
    again, he was an outsider look-
    ing in and now experiencing
    first-hand the structure, pro-
    cesses, and outcomes of medical
    care, observing “a system [that]
    doesn’t work” from the perspec-
    tive of a patient. In an interview
    a month before he died in Novem-
    ber 2000, he discussed the diffi-
    culties he had with fragmented
    care, while remaining committed
    to his quest for high quality in
    health care.5

    Optimistic to the end and
    cognizant of the social, emotion-
    al, and ethical aspects of quality
    improvement, Donabedian reflect-
    ed, “Health care is a sacred mis-
    sion . . . a moral enterprise and
    a scientific enterprise but not
    fundamentally a commercial one.
    We are not selling a product. We
    don’t have a consumer who un-
    derstands everything and makes
    rational choices — and I include
    myself here. Doctors and nurses

    PERSPECTIVE

    207

    Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    are stewards of something pre-
    cious. . . . Ultimately the secret
    of quality is love. You have to
    love your patient, you have to love
    your profession, you have to love
    your God. If you have love, you
    can then work backward to mon-
    itor and improve the system.”5

    Donabedian thus underscored
    his belief that efforts to improve
    the structure, processes, and out-
    comes of health care must be in-
    separably linked with genuine care
    and concern about the needs of
    our patients. Given his lasting
    framework for assessing the quali-

    ty of health care around the world,
    few words could better encapsulate
    the legacy of Avedis Donabedian.

    Disclosure forms provided by the authors
    are available at NEJM.org.

    From the Institute for Healthcare Policy and
    Innovation (J.Z.A., H.M.), the Departments
    of Internal Medicine (J.Z.A.) and Pediatrics
    and Communicable Diseases (H.M.), the
    Medical School ( J.Z.A., H.M.), the Depart-
    ment of Health Management and Policy,
    School of Public Health (J.Z.A., H.M.), the
    Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy
    ( J.Z.A.), and the Center for the History of
    Medicine (H.M.), all at the University of
    Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    1. Donabedian A, Attwood JC. An evaluation

    of administrative controls in medical-care
    programs. N Engl J Med 1963; 269: 347-54.
    2. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of
    medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;
    44: Suppl: 166-206.
    3. Berkowitz E. History of Health Services
    research project: interview with Avedis Do-
    nabedian. Bethesda, MD: National Informa-
    tion Center on Health Services Research and
    Health Care Technology and History of
    Medicine Division, National Library of Med-
    icine, April 16, 1998 (https:/ / www .nlm .nih
    .gov/ hmd/ nichsr/ donabedian .html).
    4. Donabedian A. The seven pillars of qual-
    ity. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114: 1115-8.
    5. Donabedian A. A founder of quality as-
    sessment encounters a troubled system first-
    hand: interview by Fitzhugh Mullan. Health
    Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20(1): 137-41.

    DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1605101
    Copyright © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Society.Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality

    Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
    permission.

    **NursesHealthStudy_.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurseshealthstudy-pdf)

    **ArticleonArtificialintelligency.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/articleonartificialintelligency-pdf)

    **ArticleonArtificialintelligency.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/articleonartificialintelligency-pdf)

    **## Home-JosieKingFoundation.pdf**

    About Josie King Foundation
    On February 22, 2001, eighteen-month-old Josie King died from medical errors.

    More than 250,000 people die every year from medical errors, making it the third leading cause of

    death in the United States.

    The Josie King Foundation’s mission is to prevent patients from dying or being harmed by medical

    errors. By uniting healthcare providers and consumers, and funding innovative safety programs, we

    hope to create a culture of patient safety, together.

    U aa

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    JKF News & Events
    Josie King Hero Award: fifth limited edition is here

    Thanks to so many amazing Josie King heroes in hospitals around the country, the first through

    fourth limited editions of the Josie King Hero Award artwork have sold out. We are pleased to
    announce the launch of the fifth limited edition of the Josie King Hero Award. We decided to use the

    foundation’s colors of brown, green, and white in this new layout. These colors symbolize safety,

    health, security, protection, and support which represent some of our core messages. Like previous

    editions, each giclee watercolor print is set in a simple clear block frame. Abstract copy flows across

    the washed background – and a thank you message from the Josie King Foundation to the hero
    recipient is beautifully printed on the back.

    To learn more click here

    [https://josieking.org/jkf-tools/josie-king-hero-award](https://josieking.org/jkf-tools/josie-king-hero-award)

    Patient Safety 24 years since Josie King died: How far have we come?

    Opportunities and challenges were recognized 24 years ago at Hopkins when Josie died. No Room

    for Error, an article just released in a special patient safety issue of Dome, a Johns Hopkins
    publication marks the fifteen-year anniversary of Josie’s death and the progress and growth in

    patient safety ever since.

    To read the article, click here.

    [https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error](https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error)

    [https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error](https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error)

    15 years later

    MedStar Health created a new Community HeRO Award. Sorrel was recognized at the MedStar

    Health Annual HeRO Luncheon.

    To read more click here

    Upcoming Speaking Engagements

    February 27 – 2025 Virginia Patient Safety Summit – Keynote Speaker – Virtual

    [https://educatetheyoung.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/sorrel-king-recognized-at-medstar-health-hero-luncheon/](https://educatetheyoung.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/sorrel-king-recognized-at-medstar-health-hero-luncheon/)

    Josie King Foundation creating a culture of patient safety, together | info@josieking.org

     

    Josie’s Story, written by Sorrel King, is used as an educational tool in the healthcare industry.

    A memoir about Josie, the medical errors that led to her death, the family’s struggles to deal with

    their grief, Sorrel’s foray into the health care industry as a patient safety advocate, and the safety
    improvements that have come about in Josie’s memory.

    More about Josie’s Story

    JKF is so happy that Josie’s Story has reached Japan. Thank you to our friends at Eiji Press, Inc. for

    doing such a great job in helping us bring her message to Japan and its healthcare industry.

    Purchase Japanese copy of Josie’s Story

    [mailto:info@josieking.org](mailto:info@josieking.org)

    [https://www.facebook.com/JosieKingFoundation/](https://www.facebook.com/JosieKingFoundation/)

    [https://twitter.com/JKFfoundation](https://twitter.com/JKFfoundation)

    [https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book](https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book)

    [https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book](https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book)

    [http://eijipress.co.jp/sp/josie/](http://eijipress.co.jp/sp/josie/)

    **## Competencies_QSEN.pdf**

    Search…

    Quality and Safety Education for Nurses

    QSEN HOME ABOUT QSEN ACADEMIA PRACTICE RESOURCES PUBLICATIONS

    Competencies
    Using the Institute of Medicine (2003) competencies for nursing, QSEN faculty have defined pre-licensure and graduate quality and safety
    competencies for nursing and proposed targets for the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be developed in nursing pre-licensure programs for
    each competency.

    Patient-Centered Care
    Teamwork & Collaboration
    Evidence-Based Practice
    Quality Improvement
    Safety
    Informatics

    Led by a national advisory board and distinguished faculty, QSEN pursues strategies to build will and develop effective teaching approaches
    to assure that future graduates develop competencies in patient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, evidence-based practice, quality
    improvement, safety, and informatics.

    Acknowledgments

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following QSEN faculty and Advisory Board members for their contributions to the development
    of the competency definitions and KSAs:

    Paul Batalden, MD, (Dartmouth)
    Geraldine Bednash, PhD, RN, FAAN, (American Association of Colleges of Nursing)
    Jean Blackwell, MLS (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Linda Cronenwett, PhD, RN, FAAN (UNC Chapel Hill)
    Lisa Day, PhD, RN (UC-San Francisco)
    Karen Drenkard, PhD, RN, CNAA, (Inova Health System)
    Carol Durham, EdD(c), MSN, RN, (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Leslie Hall, MD (U Missouri-Columbia)
    Pamela Ironside, PhD, RN, FAAN, (Indiana University)
    Jean Johnson, PhD, RN, FAAN (George Washington University)
    Mary (Polly) Johnson, MSN, RN, FAAN (NC Board of Nursing)
    Maryjoan Ladden, PhD, RN, (Harvard)
    Shirley Moore, PhD, RN, FAAN, (Case Western Reserve University)
    Audrey Nelson, PhD, RN, FAAN (Veterans Administration-Tampa)
    Gwen Sherwood, PhD, RN, FAAN (UNC Chapel Hill)
    Elaine Smith, EdD(c), MBA, MSN, RN, CNAA (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    M. Elaine Tagliareni, EdD, RN (Community College of Philadelphia)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/about-qsen](https://www.qsen.org/about-qsen)

    [https://www.qsen.org/academia](https://www.qsen.org/academia)

    [https://www.qsen.org/post/practice](https://www.qsen.org/post/practice)

    [https://www.qsen.org/post/resources](https://www.qsen.org/post/resources)

    [https://www.qsen.org/publications](https://www.qsen.org/publications)

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following for their contributions to the Spanish translation of the competency definitions:
    Nilda Peragallo-Montano, Dean, School of Nursing (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Claudia Giraldo, Bilingual Executive Assistant to the Dean, School of Nursing (UNC-Chapel Hill)

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Spanish

    QSEN Competencias de Pre-
    Licenciatura, Perspectiva de
    Enfermería, mayo-junio de 2007 y

    Translation provided by Claudia S.
    Lizcano Giraldo, Translator, UNC
    Chapel Hill School of Nursing

    Read More

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Portuguese

    Competências para o ensino sobre
    qualidade e segurança em
    enfermagem (Competências QSEN)

    Translation provided by Juliana
    Santana de Freitas

    Read More

    QSEN SES translated in
    Portuguese

    Instrumento de avaliação
    do estudante quanto
    ao ensino sobre qualidade
    e segurança em enfermagem (QSEN
    SES BR)

    Translation provided by Juliana
    Santana de Freitas

    Read More

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following for their contributions to the Turkish translation of the competency definitions:
    Dr. Öğr. Üye. Merve TARHAN, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümü
    Merve TARHAN, Asst. Prof., Health Sciences Faculty, Department of Nursing

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Turkish

    Translation provided by Dr. Öğr. Üye.
    Merve TARHAN
    Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik
    Bölümü
    Merve TARHAN, Asst. Prof.
    Health Sciences Faculty, Department
    of Nursing

    Read More

    Follow Us QSEN Institutional A�liation

    [https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf](https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf)

    [https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf](https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_fb2f549ac45b4cb7a6733861f3b59f6c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_fb2f549ac45b4cb7a6733861f3b59f6c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_33c685fbcb3745c09a90ef6bb4a6816c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_33c685fbcb3745c09a90ef6bb4a6816c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_39fe75b1260845a6b05ac4bf57faf93c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_39fe75b1260845a6b05ac4bf57faf93c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_288e2029ea514b6899d42999e2fa80a0.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_288e2029ea514b6899d42999e2fa80a0.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    qsen.institute@gmail.com

    © 2022 qsen.org

    Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy  | Accessibility

    Created by iPanda Designs

    [http://www.facebook.com/QSENInstitute](http://www.facebook.com/QSENInstitute)

    [https://twitter.com/QSEN_Institute](https://twitter.com/QSEN_Institute)

    [https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/24791299/](https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/24791299/)

    [https://www.instagram.com/qsen.institute/](https://www.instagram.com/qsen.institute/)

    [mailto:qsen.institute@gmail.com](mailto:qsen.institute@gmail.com)

    [https://nursing.case.edu/](https://nursing.case.edu/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/privacy-policy](https://www.qsen.org/privacy-policy)

    [https://www.qsen.org/cookies-policy](https://www.qsen.org/cookies-policy)

    [https://www.qsen.org/accessibility-policy](https://www.qsen.org/accessibility-policy)

    [https://ipanda.design/](https://ipanda.design/)

    **## Donabedian.pdf**

    PERSPECTIVE

    205

    donabedian’s lasting framework for health care quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    HISTORY OF MEDICINE

    Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality
    John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P., and Howard Markel, M.D., Ph.D.

    Though historians are often
    hesitant to declare any event

    a “first,” one might safely claim
    that the contemporary health care
    quality movement had its “found-
    ing moment” in October 1965.
    Less than 3 months after the
    Medicare and Medicaid programs
    were enacted, the newly created
    Health Services Research Section
    of the U.S. Public Health Service
    convened a meeting in Chicago of
    leaders from many health-related
    fields. These leaders considered
    the influence of social and eco-
    nomic research on public health,
    the organization of community
    health agencies, and the quality
    of health services.

    One of these experts, Avedis
    Donabedian, a professor of med-
    ical care organization at the Uni-
    versity of Michigan School of Pub-
    lic Health, was commissioned to
    review the research on quality
    assessment. His formative work
    was already known to readers of
    the Journal, including a 1963 arti-
    cle on administrative controls in
    medical care.1 When the confer-
    ence papers were published in
    July 1966, Donabedian could not
    have anticipated that his article,
    “Evaluating the Quality of Medi-
    cal Care,”2 would become one of
    the most frequently cited public
    health articles of the next 50
    years. More important, this arti-
    cle became the nucleus of his in-
    fluential body of work on the
    theory and practice of quality as-
    surance and the emerging field of
    health services research (see box).

    As an immigrant and a non-
    practicing physician, Donabedian
    could assess the quality of U.S.
    health care from a distinctive
    perspective. As he would note in
    1998, “I’m a double outsider in
    terms of seeing the value founda-
    tions of the health care system.
    I’m an outsider and, therefore, I
    can see how these ‘natives’ think.”3
    Donabedian was born in 1919 in
    Beirut, Lebanon, to Armenian par-
    ents who had been exiled from
    Ottoman Turkey during the Arme-
    nian genocide. Raised in Ramal-
    lah, Palestine, he followed in his
    father’s path and studied medi-
    cine. As a young physician, he
    directed the faculty and student
    health service of the American
    University in Beirut.

    This experience spawned his

    lifelong interest in the ways in
    which medical care is delivered,
    in organizations ranging from
    small clinics to large health care
    systems. In 1953, Donabedian was
    granted a scholarship to study
    epidemiology and health services
    administration at the Harvard
    School of Public Health, where
    he forged lasting relationships
    with leaders in studying health
    care, and in 1961 he was recruit-
    ed to the University of Michigan.
    For the rest of his career, he
    worked to define and develop
    methods to measure the quality
    of health care, assessing how
    clinical decision making affects
    quality and analyzing the man-
    agement and governance of health
    care systems and resources.

    In his landmark 1966 article,

    Articles
    Evaluating the quality of medical care: 1966. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;44:Suppl:

    166-206. (Reprinted in Milbank Q 2005;83:691-729.)
    Quality, cost, and health: an integrative model. Med Care 1982;20:975-92 (with J.R.

    Wheeler and L. Wyszewianski).
    The epidemiology of quality. Inquiry 1985;22:282-92.
    Twenty years of research on the quality of medical care, 1964-1984. Eval Health Prof

    1985;8:243-65.
    The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988;260:1743-8.
    The end results of health care: Ernest Codman’s contribution to quality assessment

    and beyond. Milbank Q 1989;67:233-56.
    The seven pillars of quality. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:1115-8.
    A quarter-century of work on quality of care at the Institute of Medicine. In: Institute

    of Medicine Council. For the public good: highlights from the Institute of Medi-
    cine, 1970-1995. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1995:53-7.

    Books
    The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health

    Administration Press, 1980.
    The criteria and standards of quality. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1982.
    The methods and findings of quality assessment and monitoring: an illustrated

    analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1985.
    An introduction to quality assurance in health care. New York: Oxford University

    Press, 2002.

    Notable Publications on the Quality of Health Care by Avedis Donabedian.

    PERSPECTIVE

    206

    donabedian’s lasting framework for health care quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    Donabedian proposed using the
    triad of structure, process, and
    outcome to evaluate the quality
    of health care.2 He defined “struc-
    ture” as the settings, qualifica-
    tions of providers, and adminis-
    trative systems through which
    care takes place; “process” as the
    components of care delivered;
    and “outcome” as recovery, resto-
    ration of function, and survival.
    These concepts remain the foun-
    dation of quality assessment to-
    day. Structure has long been
    assessed by means of board cer-
    tification of physicians and Joint
    Commission accreditation of hos-
    pitals. Process and outcome mea-
    sures are now vetted and en-
    dorsed by the National Quality
    Forum and National Committee
    for Quality Assurance, and Medi-
    care publicly reports the perfor-
    mance of hospitals, nursing
    homes, and health plans on such
    measures. Furthermore, board cer-
    tification programs for physicians
    now strive to foster continuous
    learning and monitoring of clini-
    cal performance measures.

    Long before the advent of elec-
    tronic health records or comput-
    erized health care data, Donabe-
    dian’s article also presaged many
    of the challenges that persist in
    current efforts to assess the
    quality of care.2 He underscored
    the difficulties of assessing qual-
    ity on the basis of medical rec-
    ords or direct observation of clini-
    cal encounters. He highlighted
    the importance of representative
    samples and clear measurement
    standards. He emphasized the
    need for valid measures of struc-
    ture and process that could be
    linked to outcomes and for reli-
    able measures of quality that were
    readily reproducible. He called for
    a broader approach to quality

    measurement that extended be-
    yond the technical management
    of illness to incorporate assess-
    ments of prevention, rehabilita-
    tion, coordination, and continu-
    ity of care, the patient–physician
    relationship, economic efficiency,
    and societal values. The current
    focus on value-based payment and
    patient-centered outcomes can be
    traced back to Donabedian’s con-
    ceptual framework.

    This framework provided the
    foundation for an influential re-
    port produced by the Institute of
    Medicine in 1990, entitled Medi-
    care: A Strategy for Quality Assurance.
    Drawing extensively on Donabe-
    dian’s work, the report defined
    quality of care as “the degree to
    which health services for indi-
    viduals and populations increase
    the likelihood of desired health
    outcomes and are consistent with
    current professional knowledge.”
    Also in 1990, Donabedian out-
    lined the “seven pillars of qual-
    ity,” 4 which would be distilled 11
    years later in the Institute of
    Medicine report Crossing the Qual-
    ity Chasm, which highlighted six
    core aims for the 21st-century
    health care system: to deliver
    care that is safe, effective, patient-
    centered, timely, efficient, and
    equitable. Benchmarks related to
    these aims have become com-
    mon metrics in clinics, hospitals,
    and health care organizations
    around the world.

    Donabedian concluded his
    1966 article with an essential
    question and a demand for evi-
    dence: “More often one needs to
    ask, ‘What goes on here?’ rather
    than, ‘What is wrong; and how
    can it be made better?’ This does
    not mean that the researcher dis-
    owns his own values or social
    objectives. It does mean, however,

    that the distinction between val-
    ues, and elements of structure,
    process or outcome, is recog-
    nized and maintained; and that
    both are subjected to equally criti-
    cal study.”

    Donabedian emphasized that
    a focus on metrics is essential.
    He also insisted that physicians
    must recognize that the culture
    and social systems in which they
    practice can enhance or detract
    from the quality of health care.
    Therefore, we believe that Donabe-
    dian would call on health care
    professionals in our current era
    to engage actively in leading and
    shaping the pursuit of high-qual-
    ity care in their organizations
    and society.

    Near the end of his life, Dona-
    bedian was frequently hospital-
    ized for complications of ad-
    vanced prostate cancer. Once
    again, he was an outsider look-
    ing in and now experiencing
    first-hand the structure, pro-
    cesses, and outcomes of medical
    care, observing “a system [that]
    doesn’t work” from the perspec-
    tive of a patient. In an interview
    a month before he died in Novem-
    ber 2000, he discussed the diffi-
    culties he had with fragmented
    care, while remaining committed
    to his quest for high quality in
    health care.5

    Optimistic to the end and
    cognizant of the social, emotion-
    al, and ethical aspects of quality
    improvement, Donabedian reflect-
    ed, “Health care is a sacred mis-
    sion . . . a moral enterprise and
    a scientific enterprise but not
    fundamentally a commercial one.
    We are not selling a product. We
    don’t have a consumer who un-
    derstands everything and makes
    rational choices — and I include
    myself here. Doctors and nurses

    PERSPECTIVE

    207

    Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    are stewards of something pre-
    cious. . . . Ultimately the secret
    of quality is love. You have to
    love your patient, you have to love
    your profession, you have to love
    your God. If you have love, you
    can then work backward to mon-
    itor and improve the system.”5

    Donabedian thus underscored
    his belief that efforts to improve
    the structure, processes, and out-
    comes of health care must be in-
    separably linked with genuine care
    and concern about the needs of
    our patients. Given his lasting
    framework for assessing the quali-

    ty of health care around the world,
    few words could better encapsulate
    the legacy of Avedis Donabedian.

    Disclosure forms provided by the authors
    are available at NEJM.org.

    From the Institute for Healthcare Policy and
    Innovation (J.Z.A., H.M.), the Departments
    of Internal Medicine (J.Z.A.) and Pediatrics
    and Communicable Diseases (H.M.), the
    Medical School ( J.Z.A., H.M.), the Depart-
    ment of Health Management and Policy,
    School of Public Health (J.Z.A., H.M.), the
    Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy
    ( J.Z.A.), and the Center for the History of
    Medicine (H.M.), all at the University of
    Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    1. Donabedian A, Attwood JC. An evaluation

    of administrative controls in medical-care
    programs. N Engl J Med 1963; 269: 347-54.
    2. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of
    medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;
    44: Suppl: 166-206.
    3. Berkowitz E. History of Health Services
    research project: interview with Avedis Do-
    nabedian. Bethesda, MD: National Informa-
    tion Center on Health Services Research and
    Health Care Technology and History of
    Medicine Division, National Library of Med-
    icine, April 16, 1998 (https:/ / www .nlm .nih
    .gov/ hmd/ nichsr/ donabedian .html).
    4. Donabedian A. The seven pillars of qual-
    ity. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114: 1115-8.
    5. Donabedian A. A founder of quality as-
    sessment encounters a troubled system first-
    hand: interview by Fitzhugh Mullan. Health
    Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20(1): 137-41.

    DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1605101
    Copyright © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Society.Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality

    Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
    permission.

    **NursesHealthStudy_.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurseshealthstudy-pdf)

    **ArticleonArtificialintelligency.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/articleonartificialintelligency-pdf)

    **## Home-JosieKingFoundation.pdf**

    About Josie King Foundation
    On February 22, 2001, eighteen-month-old Josie King died from medical errors.

    More than 250,000 people die every year from medical errors, making it the third leading cause of

    death in the United States.

    The Josie King Foundation’s mission is to prevent patients from dying or being harmed by medical

    errors. By uniting healthcare providers and consumers, and funding innovative safety programs, we

    hope to create a culture of patient safety, together.

    U aa

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    [https://josieking.org/home/](https://josieking.org/home/)

    JKF News & Events
    Josie King Hero Award: fifth limited edition is here

    Thanks to so many amazing Josie King heroes in hospitals around the country, the first through

    fourth limited editions of the Josie King Hero Award artwork have sold out. We are pleased to
    announce the launch of the fifth limited edition of the Josie King Hero Award. We decided to use the

    foundation’s colors of brown, green, and white in this new layout. These colors symbolize safety,

    health, security, protection, and support which represent some of our core messages. Like previous

    editions, each giclee watercolor print is set in a simple clear block frame. Abstract copy flows across

    the washed background – and a thank you message from the Josie King Foundation to the hero
    recipient is beautifully printed on the back.

    To learn more click here

    [https://josieking.org/jkf-tools/josie-king-hero-award](https://josieking.org/jkf-tools/josie-king-hero-award)

    Patient Safety 24 years since Josie King died: How far have we come?

    Opportunities and challenges were recognized 24 years ago at Hopkins when Josie died. No Room

    for Error, an article just released in a special patient safety issue of Dome, a Johns Hopkins
    publication marks the fifteen-year anniversary of Josie’s death and the progress and growth in

    patient safety ever since.

    To read the article, click here.

    [https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error](https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error)

    [https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error](https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/no-room-for-error)

    15 years later

    MedStar Health created a new Community HeRO Award. Sorrel was recognized at the MedStar

    Health Annual HeRO Luncheon.

    To read more click here

    Upcoming Speaking Engagements

    February 27 – 2025 Virginia Patient Safety Summit – Keynote Speaker – Virtual

    [https://educatetheyoung.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/sorrel-king-recognized-at-medstar-health-hero-luncheon/](https://educatetheyoung.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/sorrel-king-recognized-at-medstar-health-hero-luncheon/)

    Josie King Foundation creating a culture of patient safety, together | info@josieking.org

     

    Josie’s Story, written by Sorrel King, is used as an educational tool in the healthcare industry.

    A memoir about Josie, the medical errors that led to her death, the family’s struggles to deal with

    their grief, Sorrel’s foray into the health care industry as a patient safety advocate, and the safety
    improvements that have come about in Josie’s memory.

    More about Josie’s Story

    JKF is so happy that Josie’s Story has reached Japan. Thank you to our friends at Eiji Press, Inc. for

    doing such a great job in helping us bring her message to Japan and its healthcare industry.

    Purchase Japanese copy of Josie’s Story

    [mailto:info@josieking.org](mailto:info@josieking.org)

    [https://www.facebook.com/JosieKingFoundation/](https://www.facebook.com/JosieKingFoundation/)

    [https://twitter.com/JKFfoundation](https://twitter.com/JKFfoundation)

    [https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book](https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book)

    [https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book](https://josieking.org/josies-story-the-book)

    [http://eijipress.co.jp/sp/josie/](http://eijipress.co.jp/sp/josie/)

    **## Competencies_QSEN.pdf**

    Search…

    Quality and Safety Education for Nurses

    QSEN HOME ABOUT QSEN ACADEMIA PRACTICE RESOURCES PUBLICATIONS

    Competencies
    Using the Institute of Medicine (2003) competencies for nursing, QSEN faculty have defined pre-licensure and graduate quality and safety
    competencies for nursing and proposed targets for the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be developed in nursing pre-licensure programs for
    each competency.

    Patient-Centered Care
    Teamwork & Collaboration
    Evidence-Based Practice
    Quality Improvement
    Safety
    Informatics

    Led by a national advisory board and distinguished faculty, QSEN pursues strategies to build will and develop effective teaching approaches
    to assure that future graduates develop competencies in patient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, evidence-based practice, quality
    improvement, safety, and informatics.

    Acknowledgments

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following QSEN faculty and Advisory Board members for their contributions to the development
    of the competency definitions and KSAs:

    Paul Batalden, MD, (Dartmouth)
    Geraldine Bednash, PhD, RN, FAAN, (American Association of Colleges of Nursing)
    Jean Blackwell, MLS (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Linda Cronenwett, PhD, RN, FAAN (UNC Chapel Hill)
    Lisa Day, PhD, RN (UC-San Francisco)
    Karen Drenkard, PhD, RN, CNAA, (Inova Health System)
    Carol Durham, EdD(c), MSN, RN, (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Leslie Hall, MD (U Missouri-Columbia)
    Pamela Ironside, PhD, RN, FAAN, (Indiana University)
    Jean Johnson, PhD, RN, FAAN (George Washington University)
    Mary (Polly) Johnson, MSN, RN, FAAN (NC Board of Nursing)
    Maryjoan Ladden, PhD, RN, (Harvard)
    Shirley Moore, PhD, RN, FAAN, (Case Western Reserve University)
    Audrey Nelson, PhD, RN, FAAN (Veterans Administration-Tampa)
    Gwen Sherwood, PhD, RN, FAAN (UNC Chapel Hill)
    Elaine Smith, EdD(c), MBA, MSN, RN, CNAA (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    M. Elaine Tagliareni, EdD, RN (Community College of Philadelphia)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/about-qsen](https://www.qsen.org/about-qsen)

    [https://www.qsen.org/academia](https://www.qsen.org/academia)

    [https://www.qsen.org/post/practice](https://www.qsen.org/post/practice)

    [https://www.qsen.org/post/resources](https://www.qsen.org/post/resources)

    [https://www.qsen.org/publications](https://www.qsen.org/publications)

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following for their contributions to the Spanish translation of the competency definitions:
    Nilda Peragallo-Montano, Dean, School of Nursing (UNC-Chapel Hill)
    Claudia Giraldo, Bilingual Executive Assistant to the Dean, School of Nursing (UNC-Chapel Hill)

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Spanish

    QSEN Competencias de Pre-
    Licenciatura, Perspectiva de
    Enfermería, mayo-junio de 2007 y

    Translation provided by Claudia S.
    Lizcano Giraldo, Translator, UNC
    Chapel Hill School of Nursing

    Read More

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Portuguese

    Competências para o ensino sobre
    qualidade e segurança em
    enfermagem (Competências QSEN)

    Translation provided by Juliana
    Santana de Freitas

    Read More

    QSEN SES translated in
    Portuguese

    Instrumento de avaliação
    do estudante quanto
    ao ensino sobre qualidade
    e segurança em enfermagem (QSEN
    SES BR)

    Translation provided by Juliana
    Santana de Freitas

    Read More

    The QSEN Institute gratefully acknowledges the following for their contributions to the Turkish translation of the competency definitions:
    Dr. Öğr. Üye. Merve TARHAN, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümü
    Merve TARHAN, Asst. Prof., Health Sciences Faculty, Department of Nursing

    QSEN Competencies
    translated in Turkish

    Translation provided by Dr. Öğr. Üye.
    Merve TARHAN
    Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik
    Bölümü
    Merve TARHAN, Asst. Prof.
    Health Sciences Faculty, Department
    of Nursing

    Read More

    Follow Us QSEN Institutional A�liation

    [https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf](https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf)

    [https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf](https://qsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/QSEN-competencies-compacted-Spanish-I.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_fb2f549ac45b4cb7a6733861f3b59f6c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_fb2f549ac45b4cb7a6733861f3b59f6c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_33c685fbcb3745c09a90ef6bb4a6816c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_33c685fbcb3745c09a90ef6bb4a6816c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_39fe75b1260845a6b05ac4bf57faf93c.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_39fe75b1260845a6b05ac4bf57faf93c.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_288e2029ea514b6899d42999e2fa80a0.pdf](https://www.qsen.org/_files/ugd/c8a414_288e2029ea514b6899d42999e2fa80a0.pdf)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/](https://www.qsen.org/)

    qsen.institute@gmail.com

    © 2022 qsen.org

    Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy  | Accessibility

    Created by iPanda Designs

    [http://www.facebook.com/QSENInstitute](http://www.facebook.com/QSENInstitute)

    [https://twitter.com/QSEN_Institute](https://twitter.com/QSEN_Institute)

    [https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/24791299/](https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/24791299/)

    [https://www.instagram.com/qsen.institute/](https://www.instagram.com/qsen.institute/)

    [mailto:qsen.institute@gmail.com](mailto:qsen.institute@gmail.com)

    [https://nursing.case.edu/](https://nursing.case.edu/)

    [https://www.qsen.org/privacy-policy](https://www.qsen.org/privacy-policy)

    [https://www.qsen.org/cookies-policy](https://www.qsen.org/cookies-policy)

    [https://www.qsen.org/accessibility-policy](https://www.qsen.org/accessibility-policy)

    [https://ipanda.design/](https://ipanda.design/)

    **## Donabedian.pdf**

    PERSPECTIVE

    205

    donabedian’s lasting framework for health care quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    HISTORY OF MEDICINE

    Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality
    John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P., and Howard Markel, M.D., Ph.D.

    Though historians are often
    hesitant to declare any event

    a “first,” one might safely claim
    that the contemporary health care
    quality movement had its “found-
    ing moment” in October 1965.
    Less than 3 months after the
    Medicare and Medicaid programs
    were enacted, the newly created
    Health Services Research Section
    of the U.S. Public Health Service
    convened a meeting in Chicago of
    leaders from many health-related
    fields. These leaders considered
    the influence of social and eco-
    nomic research on public health,
    the organization of community
    health agencies, and the quality
    of health services.

    One of these experts, Avedis
    Donabedian, a professor of med-
    ical care organization at the Uni-
    versity of Michigan School of Pub-
    lic Health, was commissioned to
    review the research on quality
    assessment. His formative work
    was already known to readers of
    the Journal, including a 1963 arti-
    cle on administrative controls in
    medical care.1 When the confer-
    ence papers were published in
    July 1966, Donabedian could not
    have anticipated that his article,
    “Evaluating the Quality of Medi-
    cal Care,”2 would become one of
    the most frequently cited public
    health articles of the next 50
    years. More important, this arti-
    cle became the nucleus of his in-
    fluential body of work on the
    theory and practice of quality as-
    surance and the emerging field of
    health services research (see box).

    As an immigrant and a non-
    practicing physician, Donabedian
    could assess the quality of U.S.
    health care from a distinctive
    perspective. As he would note in
    1998, “I’m a double outsider in
    terms of seeing the value founda-
    tions of the health care system.
    I’m an outsider and, therefore, I
    can see how these ‘natives’ think.”3
    Donabedian was born in 1919 in
    Beirut, Lebanon, to Armenian par-
    ents who had been exiled from
    Ottoman Turkey during the Arme-
    nian genocide. Raised in Ramal-
    lah, Palestine, he followed in his
    father’s path and studied medi-
    cine. As a young physician, he
    directed the faculty and student
    health service of the American
    University in Beirut.

    This experience spawned his

    lifelong interest in the ways in
    which medical care is delivered,
    in organizations ranging from
    small clinics to large health care
    systems. In 1953, Donabedian was
    granted a scholarship to study
    epidemiology and health services
    administration at the Harvard
    School of Public Health, where
    he forged lasting relationships
    with leaders in studying health
    care, and in 1961 he was recruit-
    ed to the University of Michigan.
    For the rest of his career, he
    worked to define and develop
    methods to measure the quality
    of health care, assessing how
    clinical decision making affects
    quality and analyzing the man-
    agement and governance of health
    care systems and resources.

    In his landmark 1966 article,

    Articles
    Evaluating the quality of medical care: 1966. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;44:Suppl:

    166-206. (Reprinted in Milbank Q 2005;83:691-729.)
    Quality, cost, and health: an integrative model. Med Care 1982;20:975-92 (with J.R.

    Wheeler and L. Wyszewianski).
    The epidemiology of quality. Inquiry 1985;22:282-92.
    Twenty years of research on the quality of medical care, 1964-1984. Eval Health Prof

    1985;8:243-65.
    The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988;260:1743-8.
    The end results of health care: Ernest Codman’s contribution to quality assessment

    and beyond. Milbank Q 1989;67:233-56.
    The seven pillars of quality. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:1115-8.
    A quarter-century of work on quality of care at the Institute of Medicine. In: Institute

    of Medicine Council. For the public good: highlights from the Institute of Medi-
    cine, 1970-1995. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1995:53-7.

    Books
    The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health

    Administration Press, 1980.
    The criteria and standards of quality. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1982.
    The methods and findings of quality assessment and monitoring: an illustrated

    analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1985.
    An introduction to quality assurance in health care. New York: Oxford University

    Press, 2002.

    Notable Publications on the Quality of Health Care by Avedis Donabedian.

    PERSPECTIVE

    206

    donabedian’s lasting framework for health care quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    Donabedian proposed using the
    triad of structure, process, and
    outcome to evaluate the quality
    of health care.2 He defined “struc-
    ture” as the settings, qualifica-
    tions of providers, and adminis-
    trative systems through which
    care takes place; “process” as the
    components of care delivered;
    and “outcome” as recovery, resto-
    ration of function, and survival.
    These concepts remain the foun-
    dation of quality assessment to-
    day. Structure has long been
    assessed by means of board cer-
    tification of physicians and Joint
    Commission accreditation of hos-
    pitals. Process and outcome mea-
    sures are now vetted and en-
    dorsed by the National Quality
    Forum and National Committee
    for Quality Assurance, and Medi-
    care publicly reports the perfor-
    mance of hospitals, nursing
    homes, and health plans on such
    measures. Furthermore, board cer-
    tification programs for physicians
    now strive to foster continuous
    learning and monitoring of clini-
    cal performance measures.

    Long before the advent of elec-
    tronic health records or comput-
    erized health care data, Donabe-
    dian’s article also presaged many
    of the challenges that persist in
    current efforts to assess the
    quality of care.2 He underscored
    the difficulties of assessing qual-
    ity on the basis of medical rec-
    ords or direct observation of clini-
    cal encounters. He highlighted
    the importance of representative
    samples and clear measurement
    standards. He emphasized the
    need for valid measures of struc-
    ture and process that could be
    linked to outcomes and for reli-
    able measures of quality that were
    readily reproducible. He called for
    a broader approach to quality

    measurement that extended be-
    yond the technical management
    of illness to incorporate assess-
    ments of prevention, rehabilita-
    tion, coordination, and continu-
    ity of care, the patient–physician
    relationship, economic efficiency,
    and societal values. The current
    focus on value-based payment and
    patient-centered outcomes can be
    traced back to Donabedian’s con-
    ceptual framework.

    This framework provided the
    foundation for an influential re-
    port produced by the Institute of
    Medicine in 1990, entitled Medi-
    care: A Strategy for Quality Assurance.
    Drawing extensively on Donabe-
    dian’s work, the report defined
    quality of care as “the degree to
    which health services for indi-
    viduals and populations increase
    the likelihood of desired health
    outcomes and are consistent with
    current professional knowledge.”
    Also in 1990, Donabedian out-
    lined the “seven pillars of qual-
    ity,” 4 which would be distilled 11
    years later in the Institute of
    Medicine report Crossing the Qual-
    ity Chasm, which highlighted six
    core aims for the 21st-century
    health care system: to deliver
    care that is safe, effective, patient-
    centered, timely, efficient, and
    equitable. Benchmarks related to
    these aims have become com-
    mon metrics in clinics, hospitals,
    and health care organizations
    around the world.

    Donabedian concluded his
    1966 article with an essential
    question and a demand for evi-
    dence: “More often one needs to
    ask, ‘What goes on here?’ rather
    than, ‘What is wrong; and how
    can it be made better?’ This does
    not mean that the researcher dis-
    owns his own values or social
    objectives. It does mean, however,

    that the distinction between val-
    ues, and elements of structure,
    process or outcome, is recog-
    nized and maintained; and that
    both are subjected to equally criti-
    cal study.”

    Donabedian emphasized that
    a focus on metrics is essential.
    He also insisted that physicians
    must recognize that the culture
    and social systems in which they
    practice can enhance or detract
    from the quality of health care.
    Therefore, we believe that Donabe-
    dian would call on health care
    professionals in our current era
    to engage actively in leading and
    shaping the pursuit of high-qual-
    ity care in their organizations
    and society.

    Near the end of his life, Dona-
    bedian was frequently hospital-
    ized for complications of ad-
    vanced prostate cancer. Once
    again, he was an outsider look-
    ing in and now experiencing
    first-hand the structure, pro-
    cesses, and outcomes of medical
    care, observing “a system [that]
    doesn’t work” from the perspec-
    tive of a patient. In an interview
    a month before he died in Novem-
    ber 2000, he discussed the diffi-
    culties he had with fragmented
    care, while remaining committed
    to his quest for high quality in
    health care.5

    Optimistic to the end and
    cognizant of the social, emotion-
    al, and ethical aspects of quality
    improvement, Donabedian reflect-
    ed, “Health care is a sacred mis-
    sion . . . a moral enterprise and
    a scientific enterprise but not
    fundamentally a commercial one.
    We are not selling a product. We
    don’t have a consumer who un-
    derstands everything and makes
    rational choices — and I include
    myself here. Doctors and nurses

    PERSPECTIVE

    207

    Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality

    n engl j med 375;3 nejm.org July 21, 2016

    are stewards of something pre-
    cious. . . . Ultimately the secret
    of quality is love. You have to
    love your patient, you have to love
    your profession, you have to love
    your God. If you have love, you
    can then work backward to mon-
    itor and improve the system.”5

    Donabedian thus underscored
    his belief that efforts to improve
    the structure, processes, and out-
    comes of health care must be in-
    separably linked with genuine care
    and concern about the needs of
    our patients. Given his lasting
    framework for assessing the quali-

    ty of health care around the world,
    few words could better encapsulate
    the legacy of Avedis Donabedian.

    Disclosure forms provided by the authors
    are available at NEJM.org.

    From the Institute for Healthcare Policy and
    Innovation (J.Z.A., H.M.), the Departments
    of Internal Medicine (J.Z.A.) and Pediatrics
    and Communicable Diseases (H.M.), the
    Medical School ( J.Z.A., H.M.), the Depart-
    ment of Health Management and Policy,
    School of Public Health (J.Z.A., H.M.), the
    Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy
    ( J.Z.A.), and the Center for the History of
    Medicine (H.M.), all at the University of
    Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    1. Donabedian A, Attwood JC. An evaluation

    of administrative controls in medical-care
    programs. N Engl J Med 1963; 269: 347-54.
    2. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of
    medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;
    44: Suppl: 166-206.
    3. Berkowitz E. History of Health Services
    research project: interview with Avedis Do-
    nabedian. Bethesda, MD: National Informa-
    tion Center on Health Services Research and
    Health Care Technology and History of
    Medicine Division, National Library of Med-
    icine, April 16, 1998 (https:/ / www .nlm .nih
    .gov/ hmd/ nichsr/ donabedian .html).
    4. Donabedian A. The seven pillars of qual-
    ity. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114: 1115-8.
    5. Donabedian A. A founder of quality as-
    sessment encounters a troubled system first-
    hand: interview by Fitzhugh Mullan. Health
    Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20(1): 137-41.

    DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1605101
    Copyright © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Society.Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality

    Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
    permission.

    **NursesHealthStudy_.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurseshealthstudy-pdf)

    **ArticleonArtificialintelligency.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/articleonartificialintelligency-pdf)

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Similarity less than 15 % 2 references after 2020 – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Casestudtweek42.docx **## Casestudtweek42.docx** Follow up Visit Patient Data: BG is a 24 yo male weighing 180 pounds at 5’ 8 was schedule as a regular follow up for the following rash: ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Similarity less than 15 %

    2 references after 2020

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Casestudtweek42.docx

    **## Casestudtweek42.docx**

    Follow up Visit

    Patient Data: BG is a 24 yo male weighing 180 pounds at 5’ 8 was schedule as a regular follow up for the following rash:

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/asssigment-20879231)

    1- Identify the picture

    2- Mention at least three differential diagnoses as part of your assessment and diagnostic strategies

    3- Discuss and describe the diagnosis

    4- Discuss lines of treatment for conclude diagnosis

    ## image1.png

    **## Casestudtweek42.docx**

    Follow up Visit

    Patient Data: BG is a 24 yo male weighing 180 pounds at 5’ 8 was schedule as a regular follow up for the following rash:

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/asssigment-20879231)

    1- Identify the picture

    2- Mention at least three differential diagnoses as part of your assessment and diagnostic strategies

    3- Discuss and describe the diagnosis

    4- Discuss lines of treatment for conclude diagnosis

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Homework help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PATIENT POPULATIONS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    To complete this assignment, you will utilize the case study assigned to you by faculty for a patient population for special consideration during prescribing practices. You will consider the specific patient and determine the appropriate medication to prescribe, based on the patient specifics and me…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    To complete this assignment, you will utilize the case study assigned to you by faculty for a patient population for special consideration during prescribing practices. You will consider the specific patient and determine the appropriate medication to prescribe, based on the patient specifics and medication attributes in various case studies. You will construct a 4- to 5-page paper in which you determine the medication, the dosing, necessary patient education, and potential side effects. You will also indicate why the other medications would not be appropriate, as well as any necessary labs or diagnostics that might be needed. You will develop a plan to enhance medication adherence for the nonadherent patient.

    *PLEASE FOLLOW THE RUBRIC IN THE ATTACHED FILES!!**

    **SCREENSHOT OF DIRECTIONS IN FILES!!**

    **Construct** a p concerning your assigned vulnerable population patient case. In your p include the following:

    – Determine which medication would be most appropriate to prescribe from the assigned vulnerable population patient case medication choices.
    – Explain your rationale for choosing this medication. Explain why the other medications listed are not appropriate for this patient.
    – Explain the dosing schedule for the specific patient including the therapeutic endpoint.
    – Provide necessary education to the patient to review risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the medication.
    – Describe any necessary labs or additional diagnostics needed prior to prescribing this medication.
    – Explain how you might monitor efficacy or side effects of the medication.
    – Include any additional collaboration or education to others that would be necessary for this patient. Consider family members, home health care, primary care providers, etc.
    – What would you need to include in your assessment for a patient who may become nonadherent with your prescribing plan for your scenario? What are alternative treatment solutions based upon how you assessed? Describe your new treatment plan.

    This Assignment requires a minimum of **five (5)** peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.

    **Note:** You will need to include the APA style formatting.

    Assigned patient:

    **Patient 3:** A 33-year-old female that is 6 weeks postpartum. She presents with depressed mood, sadness, easily emotional, difficulties with sleep even when the infant is sleeping. She has lost weight and has a poor appetite. You note psychomotor retardation. She has limited interests in hobbies or bonding with the infant. Her partner is concerned and reports she is typically active and “bubbly” and enjoys the outdoors. She is diagnosed with major depressive disorder, with postpartum onset. She denies suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, or infanticidal ideation. No psychotic symptoms are present. She is nursing the infant and wants to continue this hoping it will assist with bonding with the infant. **Med List:** lithium, paroxetine, sertraline

    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-27at9.49.43AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-27at9-49-43am-png "Screenshot2025-01-27at9.49.43AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-27at9.49.53AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-27at9-49-53am-png "Screenshot2025-01-27at9.49.53AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-27at9.49.50AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-27at9-49-50am-png "Screenshot2025-01-27at9.49.50AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-27at9.59.22AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-27at9-59-22am-png "Screenshot2025-01-27at9.59.22AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-27at9.59.32AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-27at9-59-32am-png "Screenshot2025-01-27at9.59.32AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-27at9.59.17AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-27at9-59-17am-png "Screenshot2025-01-27at9.59.17AM.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] WRITING PRESCRIPTIONS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **PLEASE FOLLOW THE RUBRIC ATTACHED IN FILES!!** **EXAMPLE OF HOW THIS ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN SHARED FILES!!** Electronic medical records systems are not always available, so the importance of knowing how to write an accurate prescription on a prescription pad is imperative. Writi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **PLEASE FOLLOW THE RUBRIC ATTACHED IN FILES!!**

    **EXAMPLE OF HOW THIS ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN SHARED FILES!!**

    Electronic medical records systems are not always available, so the importance of knowing how to write an accurate prescription on a prescription pad is imperative. Writing prescription medications is something you will be doing day after day, patient after patient. There are special considerations depending on the DEA schedule of controlled medication you are writing. This Assignment will start preparing you for this task and understanding.

    **Note:** Written prescriptions for pharmacies may differ from chart orders for hospitalizations. For this Assignment, you are writing outpatient prescriptions for pharmacies.

    **Create** prescriptions using the patient information, medications, and indications listed below. Your goal is to demonstrate the accurate way to write a prescription that a patient would present to a pharmacy. The prescription should be written and signed. You will develop your mock prescriptions in a word document to include everything one might find on a printed prescription pad. You will write one prescription per page.

    To write your prescriptions, please use the following patient information:

    – Patient Name: Jane Doe
    – DOB 1/1/2001
    – Duration: 3 months

    Write a prescription for each of the following medications:

    – Sertraline, 100mg each day (depression)
    – Lorazepam, 1mg twice each day, if needed (panic attacks)
    – Aripiprazole, 2mg before bedtime (depression)
    – Methylphenidate ER, 54mg every morning before school (ADHD)

    – [\
    \
    writing-prescriptionEXAMPLE.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/writing-prescriptionexample-pdf "writing-prescriptionEXAMPLE.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-27at9.20.05AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-27at9-20-05am-png "Screenshot2025-01-27at9.20.05AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-27at9.20.08AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-27at9-20-08am-png "Screenshot2025-01-27at9.20.08AM.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] patient education

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    what is patient education on health maintenance ? – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    what is  patient education on health maintenance ?

    – 2 years ago