My Blog

Tag: Constitutional

  • [Solved] Extra 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Extra1.docx **## Extra1.docx** Send me a copy of the certificate when the game is complete Due 1/10/2025 ![A close-up of a document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/extra-1-20874695) ![A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated](https://www.s…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Extra1.docx

    **## Extra1.docx**

    Send me a copy of the certificate when the game is complete

    Due 1/10/2025

    ![A close-up of a document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/extra-1-20874695)

    ![A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/extra-1-20874695)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Extra1.docx**

    Send me a copy of the certificate when the game is complete

    Due 1/10/2025

    ![A close-up of a document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/extra-1-20874695)

    ![A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/extra-1-20874695)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

  • [Solved] Response 2.2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## response2.2.docx **## response2.2.docx** **100 word response** **1 reference/intext citation** **Due 1/10/2025** **Shroeder** **Post 2 Q2:** The orientations of trying to prove a case and uncovering the truth aren’t necessarily different. If investigators coexist, be…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## response2.2.docx

    **## response2.2.docx**

    **100 word response**

    **1 reference/intext citation**

    **Due 1/10/2025**

    **Shroeder**

    **Post 2 Q2:**
    The orientations of trying to prove a case and uncovering the truth aren’t necessarily different. If investigators coexist, between both, it takes balance. The main goal should be uncovering the truth. Uncovering the truth despite the tension is the better route. This is because integrity and having multiple different people on the case are more beneficial. Having more than one other person allows for group work to consider multiple theories rather than being tunnel vision. This allows for possible leads or building a stronger case in general. It does just that and avoids mistakes and confirmation biases. With uncovering the truth, it helps investigators to focus on seeking justice, not just winning the case, but simply helping someone like a victim’s life. However, the limitation of uncovering the truth can be more tedious and time-consuming as reaching out to experts and revisiting evidence takes up more time. It can be difficult for prosecutors to prove their point in court as proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is with given evidence. An example of uncovering the truth would be the Innocence Project as these cases are typically complicated as they are. The Innocence is an organization that takes on wrongfully convicted individuals using tools like DNA testing. “During the last quarter century, there have been 325 DNA exonerations in the US (1989-2014). What seemingly started as a few tragic examples of wrongful convictions has turned into a growing body of cases (and individuals), allowing for deep investigation and research to determine why these injustices occur and how they might be prevented” (West, Meterko, 2015).

    **## response2.2.docx**

    **100 word response**

    **1 reference/intext citation**

    **Due 1/10/2025**

    **Shroeder**

    **Post 2 Q2:**
    The orientations of trying to prove a case and uncovering the truth aren’t necessarily different. If investigators coexist, between both, it takes balance. The main goal should be uncovering the truth. Uncovering the truth despite the tension is the better route. This is because integrity and having multiple different people on the case are more beneficial. Having more than one other person allows for group work to consider multiple theories rather than being tunnel vision. This allows for possible leads or building a stronger case in general. It does just that and avoids mistakes and confirmation biases. With uncovering the truth, it helps investigators to focus on seeking justice, not just winning the case, but simply helping someone like a victim’s life. However, the limitation of uncovering the truth can be more tedious and time-consuming as reaching out to experts and revisiting evidence takes up more time. It can be difficult for prosecutors to prove their point in court as proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is with given evidence. An example of uncovering the truth would be the Innocence Project as these cases are typically complicated as they are. The Innocence is an organization that takes on wrongfully convicted individuals using tools like DNA testing. “During the last quarter century, there have been 325 DNA exonerations in the US (1989-2014). What seemingly started as a few tragic examples of wrongful convictions has turned into a growing body of cases (and individuals), allowing for deep investigation and research to determine why these injustices occur and how they might be prevented” (West, Meterko, 2015).

  • [Solved] american courts

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) In a minimum of 150 words, using scholarly material and proper citations, please answer the following question: **Does politics play a role in the operation of American Courts? Explain and support your point of view.** – 2 yea…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    In a minimum of 150 words, using scholarly material and proper citations, please answer the following question:

    **Does politics play a role in the operation of American Courts? Explain and support your point of view.**

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Response 2.1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## response2.1.docx **## response2.1.docx** **100 word response** **1 reference/intext citation** **Due 1/10/2025** **Epps** **Post 2 Q2:** Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth. Are these orientations fundamentally d…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## response2.1.docx

    **## response2.1.docx**

    **100 word response**

    **1 reference/intext citation**

    **Due 1/10/2025**

    **Epps**

    **Post 2 Q2:**
    Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth. Are these orientations fundamentally different, or can they coexist within investigative work? Choose one orientation, explain your perspective, and use a real or hypothetical case example to illustrate this approach's strengths and potential limitations.

    In investigative work, there exists a critical ethical dilemma between the pursuit of proving a case and the commitment to uncovering the truth. Prioritizing truth over winning allows for a more nuanced understanding of the circumstances, emphasizing integrity and thoroughness. This approach not only serves justice but also enhances the credibility of investigators, fostering trust within the community and improving cooperation from witnesses. A focus on truth is essential in preventing miscarriages of justice, as it helps to protect innocent individuals from wrongful convictions and maintains the overall integrity of the justice system.

    However, this commitment to uncovering the truth can present significant challenges. Thorough investigations often demand considerable time and resources, which may be scarce in high-pressure situations that prioritize expedient outcomes. Additionally, the emotional and psychological toll on investigators can be substantial, especially when confronting distressing realities in serious crime cases. Despite these potential limitations, the long-term benefits of seeking the truth underscore its importance in maintaining a just and equitable legal system.

    A Hypothetical Example

    The case of a robbery at a local convenience store highlights the difference between an investigator focused on proving guilt based on a suspect's prior criminal record and one dedicated to uncovering the truth. While the former might quickly build a case against the suspect, the latter would conduct thorough interviews, review surveillance footage, and examine additional evidence, potentially revealing that the suspect was not at the scene and that another individual, without a criminal history, was responsible. This commitment to truth not only safeguards the innocent but also ensures that the real perpetrator is held accountable, resulting in a more just outcome for the community, despite requiring more time and effort.

    **## response2.1.docx**

    **100 word response**

    **1 reference/intext citation**

    **Due 1/10/2025**

    **Epps**

    **Post 2 Q2:**
    Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth. Are these orientations fundamentally different, or can they coexist within investigative work? Choose one orientation, explain your perspective, and use a real or hypothetical case example to illustrate this approach's strengths and potential limitations.

    In investigative work, there exists a critical ethical dilemma between the pursuit of proving a case and the commitment to uncovering the truth. Prioritizing truth over winning allows for a more nuanced understanding of the circumstances, emphasizing integrity and thoroughness. This approach not only serves justice but also enhances the credibility of investigators, fostering trust within the community and improving cooperation from witnesses. A focus on truth is essential in preventing miscarriages of justice, as it helps to protect innocent individuals from wrongful convictions and maintains the overall integrity of the justice system.

    However, this commitment to uncovering the truth can present significant challenges. Thorough investigations often demand considerable time and resources, which may be scarce in high-pressure situations that prioritize expedient outcomes. Additionally, the emotional and psychological toll on investigators can be substantial, especially when confronting distressing realities in serious crime cases. Despite these potential limitations, the long-term benefits of seeking the truth underscore its importance in maintaining a just and equitable legal system.

    A Hypothetical Example

    The case of a robbery at a local convenience store highlights the difference between an investigator focused on proving guilt based on a suspect's prior criminal record and one dedicated to uncovering the truth. While the former might quickly build a case against the suspect, the latter would conduct thorough interviews, review surveillance footage, and examine additional evidence, potentially revealing that the suspect was not at the scene and that another individual, without a criminal history, was responsible. This commitment to truth not only safeguards the innocent but also ensures that the real perpetrator is held accountable, resulting in a more just outcome for the community, despite requiring more time and effort.

  • [Solved] Response 1.2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## response1.2.docx **## response1.2.docx** **100 word response** **1 reference/intext citation** **Due 1/10/2025** **Schroeder** **Post 1 Q1:** “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods by piecing together events, memories, and behaviors to make a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## response1.2.docx

    **## response1.2.docx**

    **100 word response**

    **1 reference/intext citation**

    **Due 1/10/2025**

    **Schroeder**

    **Post 1 Q1:**
    “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods by piecing together events, memories, and behaviors to make a timeline. This allows us to understand what happened before, during, and after. Technologies aid this process. For example, forensic analysis, surveillance, and witness statements/ interviews allow investigators to reconstruct the past of an event (crime or incident). Forensic analysis evidence can include fingerprinting and ballistics to help match and imagine certain events like a murder weapon, for instance. Surveillance footage can physically show the movements and locations of suspects. Witness statements/ interviews can give insights into the sequence of events that led up to or during the crime. Reconstructing can enhance past events by clarifying and opening other possible leads to an investigation. Revisiting patterns of criminal activity can alleviate insights in an ongoing investigation. Reexamining evidence can reveal something that was overlooked. On the other hand, reconstructing can complicate an investigation. For instance, it can be complicated by conflicting eyewitness testimonies as people remember differently and factors like trauma. Contaminated evidence can affect the outcome of a case. “Physical evidence is crucial to proving the elements of a crime and it alone can establish guilt” (Vecchi, 2004). On the contrary, physical evidence can also clear a person or disprove a crime. An example of a case where reconstructing past events was pivotal in advancing or hindering the investigation would be the Oklahoma City bombing. Upon reaching the investigation, I remember that the witness made a statement about the truck, but the witness ended up having a connection to that truck used in the bombing. Surveillance footage advanced the investigation by changing the witness to the suspect. However, what complicated this investigation was the investigation that was misconceived where the bomb had come from. In this case, investigators had to reevaluate all the evidence.

    **## response1.2.docx**

    **100 word response**

    **1 reference/intext citation**

    **Due 1/10/2025**

    **Schroeder**

    **Post 1 Q1:**
    “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods by piecing together events, memories, and behaviors to make a timeline. This allows us to understand what happened before, during, and after. Technologies aid this process. For example, forensic analysis, surveillance, and witness statements/ interviews allow investigators to reconstruct the past of an event (crime or incident). Forensic analysis evidence can include fingerprinting and ballistics to help match and imagine certain events like a murder weapon, for instance. Surveillance footage can physically show the movements and locations of suspects. Witness statements/ interviews can give insights into the sequence of events that led up to or during the crime. Reconstructing can enhance past events by clarifying and opening other possible leads to an investigation. Revisiting patterns of criminal activity can alleviate insights in an ongoing investigation. Reexamining evidence can reveal something that was overlooked. On the other hand, reconstructing can complicate an investigation. For instance, it can be complicated by conflicting eyewitness testimonies as people remember differently and factors like trauma. Contaminated evidence can affect the outcome of a case. “Physical evidence is crucial to proving the elements of a crime and it alone can establish guilt” (Vecchi, 2004). On the contrary, physical evidence can also clear a person or disprove a crime. An example of a case where reconstructing past events was pivotal in advancing or hindering the investigation would be the Oklahoma City bombing. Upon reaching the investigation, I remember that the witness made a statement about the truck, but the witness ended up having a connection to that truck used in the bombing. Surveillance footage advanced the investigation by changing the witness to the suspect. However, what complicated this investigation was the investigation that was misconceived where the bomb had come from. In this case, investigators had to reevaluate all the evidence.

  • [Solved] Response 1.1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## response1.1.docx **## response1.1.docx** **100 word response** **1 reference/intext citation** **Due 1/10/2025** **Bet** **Post 1 Q1:** “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods in more than one way, and particularly in the area of criminal inve…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## response1.1.docx

    **## response1.1.docx**

    **100 word response**

    **1 reference/intext citation**

    **Due 1/10/2025**

    **Bet**

    **Post 1 Q1:**
    “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods in more than one way, and particularly in the area of criminal investigations. The process of reconstructing the past involves accumulating pieces of evidence to put together and gain a better understanding of what took place previously. This process is crucial during the information gathering stage of all investigations. A potential complication of reconstructing the past can be the influencing of perspectives and biases of people working on the investigation. This influence can lead to misinterpretations or incorrect handling of evidence, which ultimately compromises the truth. However, a potential enhancement of the investigation is confirmation of a hypothesis, or a confirmation of evidence. By having a timeline to refer to, investigators can strengthen their case and positively confirm information that they otherwise may not have been able to firmly support. Scientists can also test hypotheses more effectively by reconstructing the past. Overall, the intersection of reconstructing the past with investigative methods highlights the necessity of this approach to gathering and interpreting evidence. It emphasizes the need for critical thinking and analytical skills. A really well known case that I have chosen to include is the unsolved case of Madeleine McCann in 2007. This is an example of when reconstructing the past can be a hindrance rather than a help during an investigation. After the child was abducted, the police began trying to reconstruct what happened that night but they received multiple unfounded theories and misinformation. And because of these conflicting witness statements and unfounded theories, it caused chaos and confusion.

    **## response1.1.docx**

    **100 word response**

    **1 reference/intext citation**

    **Due 1/10/2025**

    **Bet**

    **Post 1 Q1:**
    “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods in more than one way, and particularly in the area of criminal investigations. The process of reconstructing the past involves accumulating pieces of evidence to put together and gain a better understanding of what took place previously. This process is crucial during the information gathering stage of all investigations. A potential complication of reconstructing the past can be the influencing of perspectives and biases of people working on the investigation. This influence can lead to misinterpretations or incorrect handling of evidence, which ultimately compromises the truth. However, a potential enhancement of the investigation is confirmation of a hypothesis, or a confirmation of evidence. By having a timeline to refer to, investigators can strengthen their case and positively confirm information that they otherwise may not have been able to firmly support. Scientists can also test hypotheses more effectively by reconstructing the past. Overall, the intersection of reconstructing the past with investigative methods highlights the necessity of this approach to gathering and interpreting evidence. It emphasizes the need for critical thinking and analytical skills. A really well known case that I have chosen to include is the unsolved case of Madeleine McCann in 2007. This is an example of when reconstructing the past can be a hindrance rather than a help during an investigation. After the child was abducted, the police began trying to reconstruct what happened that night but they received multiple unfounded theories and misinformation. And because of these conflicting witness statements and unfounded theories, it caused chaos and confusion.

  • [Solved] Summarize the issues facing policing during the Political Era.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Summarize the issues facing policing during the Political Era. How do politics harm impartiality in policing? Describe aspects of politics in policing today and attempts at reform.** – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Summarize the issues facing policing during the Political Era. How do politics harm impartiality in policing? Describe aspects of politics in policing today and attempts at reform.**

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] case brief

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    can someone write this for me – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    can someone write this for me

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Criminal Justice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) 1) How does an investigator prepare for an interview or interrogation? Are there differences? 2) Find a state supreme court or state appeals case from your state in which a conviction of a defendant from a lower court was over…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    1) How does an investigator prepare for an interview or interrogation? Are there differences?

    2) Find a state supreme court or state appeals case from your state in which a conviction of a defendant from a lower court was overturned due to improper police tactics during an interrogation. Discuss and properly list the website.

    500 words and 2 references

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Week 2 Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Please see Two Attachments – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx – Article2.pdf **## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx** Instructions · See ATTACHED ARTICLE to complete an article critique · 2 Pages …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Please see Two Attachments

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx

    – Article2.pdf

    **## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx**

    Instructions

    · See ATTACHED ARTICLE to complete an article critique

    · 2 Pages in length

    · APA format

    · Must contain the three parts below

    1. Summary: After completing the assigned readings ask yourself: What are the main arguments? What is the point this book/article/chapter is trying to make? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book/chapter is about, what would you say? If someone asked what are the topics in the subject/topic area that this article/book/chapter discussed, what would you say? Are there vague or sweeping generalizations that aren't backed up with evidence? Are arguments very one-sided with no acknowledgment of other viewpoints?

    2. Assessment: After summarizing, it is helpful to evaluate/assess what was read. Reading materials are divided into logical presentation sections (i.e. a beginning,  a middle, and an end). Summarize the main points of the section(s) you evaluate as having the most relevant/important material. It might be helpful, the following questions are suggestions: What have you learned about the subject? What is(are) the issue(s)? Is there consensus/disagreement: in what areas, what about that consensus/disagreement? What areas are still being researched? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? Is the evidence based on a few studies or many? Does the author use a good mix of sources of information (primary and secondary)?

    3. Reflection: Once you've summarized and assessed, you need to ask how it fits in the class and/or your research interest. Was this source helpful in identifying issues? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic or the theory? Does the author offer sound reasons for reaching conclusions? How timely is the source? But be aware that some books/articles become dated when new research is available, but another source can be quite sound 50 or 100 years later.

    **Article2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article2-pdf-10153379)

    **Article2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article2-pdf-10153379)

    **## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx**

    Instructions

    · See ATTACHED ARTICLE to complete an article critique

    · 2 Pages in length

    · APA format

    · Must contain the three parts below

    1. Summary: After completing the assigned readings ask yourself: What are the main arguments? What is the point this book/article/chapter is trying to make? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book/chapter is about, what would you say? If someone asked what are the topics in the subject/topic area that this article/book/chapter discussed, what would you say? Are there vague or sweeping generalizations that aren't backed up with evidence? Are arguments very one-sided with no acknowledgment of other viewpoints?

    2. Assessment: After summarizing, it is helpful to evaluate/assess what was read. Reading materials are divided into logical presentation sections (i.e. a beginning,  a middle, and an end). Summarize the main points of the section(s) you evaluate as having the most relevant/important material. It might be helpful, the following questions are suggestions: What have you learned about the subject? What is(are) the issue(s)? Is there consensus/disagreement: in what areas, what about that consensus/disagreement? What areas are still being researched? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? Is the evidence based on a few studies or many? Does the author use a good mix of sources of information (primary and secondary)?

    3. Reflection: Once you've summarized and assessed, you need to ask how it fits in the class and/or your research interest. Was this source helpful in identifying issues? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic or the theory? Does the author offer sound reasons for reaching conclusions? How timely is the source? But be aware that some books/articles become dated when new research is available, but another source can be quite sound 50 or 100 years later.

    **Article2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article2-pdf-10153379)

    **## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx**

    Instructions

    · See ATTACHED ARTICLE to complete an article critique

    · 2 Pages in length

    · APA format

    · Must contain the three parts below

    1. Summary: After completing the assigned readings ask yourself: What are the main arguments? What is the point this book/article/chapter is trying to make? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book/chapter is about, what would you say? If someone asked what are the topics in the subject/topic area that this article/book/chapter discussed, what would you say? Are there vague or sweeping generalizations that aren't backed up with evidence? Are arguments very one-sided with no acknowledgment of other viewpoints?

    2. Assessment: After summarizing, it is helpful to evaluate/assess what was read. Reading materials are divided into logical presentation sections (i.e. a beginning,  a middle, and an end). Summarize the main points of the section(s) you evaluate as having the most relevant/important material. It might be helpful, the following questions are suggestions: What have you learned about the subject? What is(are) the issue(s)? Is there consensus/disagreement: in what areas, what about that consensus/disagreement? What areas are still being researched? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? Is the evidence based on a few studies or many? Does the author use a good mix of sources of information (primary and secondary)?

    3. Reflection: Once you've summarized and assessed, you need to ask how it fits in the class and/or your research interest. Was this source helpful in identifying issues? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic or the theory? Does the author offer sound reasons for reaching conclusions? How timely is the source? But be aware that some books/articles become dated when new research is available, but another source can be quite sound 50 or 100 years later.

    **Article2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article2-pdf-10153379)