My Blog

Tag: English

  • [Solved] Discussion help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In 500 words, I need a topic about obesity and a few points during this assignment such as: – the working thesis you have settled on for your project – how you arrived at the topic – some of the other ideas you considered in your brainstorming activities – _at least_ two reasons for choosing this to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In 500 words, I need a topic about obesity and a few points during this assignment such as:

    – the working thesis you have settled on for your project
    – how you arrived at the topic
    – some of the other ideas you considered in your brainstorming activities
    – _at least_ two reasons for choosing this topic (universal value + personal interest)
    – what initial library research you have conducted so far/what working knowledge you've gathered to date
    – what you hope to learn from researching this topic for weeks

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 3-HUM Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Humanities homework 3 – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Humanities homework 3

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] db

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In this discussion, you will identify a theory you will use to guide your research and summarize research you have found related to the theory. You will also give your classmates feedback on their summary of research on the theory they chose. This discussion will help you prepare the Milestone Two l…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In this discussion, you will identify a theory you will use to guide your research and summarize research you have found related to the theory. You will also give your classmates feedback on their summary of research on the theory they chose. This discussion will help you prepare the Milestone Two literature review.

    First, identify at least one theory that you will use to guide your research. The theory should help explain your chosen topic. It should also help explain your choice of basic or applied research.

    For your initial discussion post:

    – Identify the theory you chose and provide a brief overview.
    – Discuss why you chose this theory.
    – How does this theory apply to your topic of interest?
    – Provide a summary of related research that may both support and challenge this theory and its application.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] answer all this question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **DISCUSS WHY OR WHY NOT YOU CURRENTLY LIVE AS MARK CUBAN DESCRIBES, “DOING WHAT YOU WANT, WHEN YOU WANT, HOW YOU WANT.” ALSO IN YOUR EXERCISE DISCUSS WHICH ONE OF ANTON KRIEL’S TEN “SECRETS” YOU FIND MOST USEFUL AND HOW YOU CAN APPLY SAID SECRET TO YOUR OWN LIFE.** – [\ \ englishhwVA.docx](https:…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **DISCUSS WHY OR WHY NOT YOU CURRENTLY LIVE AS MARK CUBAN DESCRIBES, “DOING WHAT YOU WANT, WHEN YOU WANT, HOW YOU WANT.”  ALSO IN YOUR EXERCISE DISCUSS WHICH ONE OF ANTON KRIEL’S TEN “SECRETS” YOU FIND MOST USEFUL AND HOW YOU CAN APPLY SAID SECRET TO YOUR OWN LIFE.**

    – [\
    \
    englishhwVA.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/englishhwva-docx "englishhwVA.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Analyzing Privacy Violations

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Analyzing Privacy Violations** – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Module2.docx **## Module2.docx** **Module 2: A Case for Analyzing Privacy Violations** For this assignment, you will need to review the Case Study presented and assess the impact of the data breach that occurred under your third-pa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Analyzing Privacy Violations**

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Module2.docx

    **## Module2.docx**

    **Module 2: A Case for Analyzing Privacy Violations**

    For this assignment, you will need to review the Case Study presented and assess the impact of the data breach that occurred under your third-party vendor’s system and provide a short report of your conclusions, corrective actions to take, and policy change recommendations.

    Expand AllPanels Collapse AllPanels

    [**Case Study**](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787139?module_item_id=15516728)

    As the Privacy Officer for a mid-sized healthcare organization, it has been identified that the organization has suffered a breach when a third-party vendor’s system was compromised. When the third-party vendor provided billing services to your patients for all services provided for the past 60-days, a breach resulted in unauthorized access to patient billing information, including names, addresses, and social security numbers. The investigation into the breach provided insight that the third-party vendor did not have ample security measures in place. Unfortunately, the healthcare organization did not conduct their due diligence of ensuring that there were regular audits being performed and that there were strong security measures in place. As a result of this lapse in follow through, the discovered breach exposed the personal and financial information of hundreds of patients.

    [**Action Plan**](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787139?module_item_id=15516728)

    As the Privacy Officer, you have been tasked with digging deeper into the privacy breach that just occurred and to make corrective action recommendations, as well as provide a proposal of changes to the policies and procedures to prevent similar data breaches from occurring in the future. You should focus on the aspect of the vendor management and compliance with HIPAA regulations.

    **Steps you will complete the following as part of your report:**

    1. Assess the HIPAA Privacy Rule violations relevant to the third-party vendor management and the protection of patient information. What are your conclusions?

    2. Based upon the breach investigation findings, provide a list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve the security measures and for the oversight of the third-party vendor.

    3. Provide a recommendation of policy changes that would better support vendor management practices and ensure adherence to compliance with privacy regulations.

    Your deliverable method can be either in the form of a half-page to full page report or PowerPoint slides that outline your recommendations for updating/revising the organization’s privacy policy that includes a proposed corrective action plan of what is needed to prevent additional breaches from occurring.

    Note: If you utilize your textbook or any references to support your recommendations, provide a reference list.

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your file, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **M2 A Case for Analyzing Privacy Violations**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | M2 A Case for Analyzing Privacy Violations |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParameters<br>Parameters<br>Paper Option<br>-Uses standard double-spacing without extra spaces between bullets or paragraphs<br>-Minimum length 1/2 page, maximum length 1 page<br>-Free of grammatical & spelling errors<br>-Uses APA in-text citations and reference list IF applicable<br>PowerPoint Option<br>-No more than 5 bullets per slide<br>-Keep slides uncluttered so easy to follow<br>-Notes Section of slides should contain a detailed outline of what slide is presenting (speaker notes)<br>-Free of grammatical & spelling errors<br>-Uses APA in-text citations and reference list on a reference slide IF applicable | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly encompasses all paper or PowerPoint parameters -Free of grammatical & spelling errors -Uses APA in-text citations and reference list IF applicable | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets paper or PowerPoint parameters -1-3 grammatical & spelling errors -Uses some APA in-text citations and reference list IF applicable | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly meet the paper or PowerPoint parameters -Has 4 or more grammatical & spelling errors -does not use APA in-text citations and reference list IF applicable | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission clearly does not meet the required Parameters | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHIPAA Privacy Rule<br>HIPAA Privacy Rule<br>-Clearly identifies any violations relevant to the third-party vendor management<br>CO2 | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **9 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly provides for any violations relevant to the third-party vendor management | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly identifies the violations relevant to the third-party vendor management | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission is off topic or does not clearly identify the violations relevant to the third-party vendor management | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly meet compliance issue audit findings or nothing submitted | | 9 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicy Changes<br>Policy Changes<br>-Clearly identified policy changes that would support vendor management practices<br>-A plan for meeting compliance with privacy regulations<br>CO2 | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **9 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly identified policy changes that would support vendor management practices -A plan for meeting compliance with privacy regulations | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly contains identified policy changes that would support vendor management practices -A plan for meeting compliance with privacy regulations | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly provide policy changes for vendor management practices or a plan for meeting compliance with privacy regulations | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly meet a security measure assessment or nothing submitted | | 9 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrective Actions<br>Corrective Actions<br>-Provides a clear list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve security measures and oversight of third-party vendors<br>CO2 | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission has clear list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve security measures and oversight of third-party vendors | **7 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission contains a mostly clear list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve security measures and oversight of third-party vendors compliance deficiencies | **4 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission may be slightly off topic or does not clearly provide list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve security measures and oversight of third-party vendors | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly give a list of corrective actions or nothing is submitted | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 35 |

    **## Module2.docx**

    **Module 2: A Case for Analyzing Privacy Violations**

    For this assignment, you will need to review the Case Study presented and assess the impact of the data breach that occurred under your third-party vendor’s system and provide a short report of your conclusions, corrective actions to take, and policy change recommendations.

    Expand AllPanels Collapse AllPanels

    [**Case Study**](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787139?module_item_id=15516728)

    As the Privacy Officer for a mid-sized healthcare organization, it has been identified that the organization has suffered a breach when a third-party vendor’s system was compromised. When the third-party vendor provided billing services to your patients for all services provided for the past 60-days, a breach resulted in unauthorized access to patient billing information, including names, addresses, and social security numbers. The investigation into the breach provided insight that the third-party vendor did not have ample security measures in place. Unfortunately, the healthcare organization did not conduct their due diligence of ensuring that there were regular audits being performed and that there were strong security measures in place. As a result of this lapse in follow through, the discovered breach exposed the personal and financial information of hundreds of patients.

    [**Action Plan**](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787139?module_item_id=15516728)

    As the Privacy Officer, you have been tasked with digging deeper into the privacy breach that just occurred and to make corrective action recommendations, as well as provide a proposal of changes to the policies and procedures to prevent similar data breaches from occurring in the future. You should focus on the aspect of the vendor management and compliance with HIPAA regulations.

    **Steps you will complete the following as part of your report:**

    1. Assess the HIPAA Privacy Rule violations relevant to the third-party vendor management and the protection of patient information. What are your conclusions?

    2. Based upon the breach investigation findings, provide a list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve the security measures and for the oversight of the third-party vendor.

    3. Provide a recommendation of policy changes that would better support vendor management practices and ensure adherence to compliance with privacy regulations.

    Your deliverable method can be either in the form of a half-page to full page report or PowerPoint slides that outline your recommendations for updating/revising the organization’s privacy policy that includes a proposed corrective action plan of what is needed to prevent additional breaches from occurring.

    Note: If you utilize your textbook or any references to support your recommendations, provide a reference list.

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your file, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **M2 A Case for Analyzing Privacy Violations**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | M2 A Case for Analyzing Privacy Violations |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParameters<br>Parameters<br>Paper Option<br>-Uses standard double-spacing without extra spaces between bullets or paragraphs<br>-Minimum length 1/2 page, maximum length 1 page<br>-Free of grammatical & spelling errors<br>-Uses APA in-text citations and reference list IF applicable<br>PowerPoint Option<br>-No more than 5 bullets per slide<br>-Keep slides uncluttered so easy to follow<br>-Notes Section of slides should contain a detailed outline of what slide is presenting (speaker notes)<br>-Free of grammatical & spelling errors<br>-Uses APA in-text citations and reference list on a reference slide IF applicable | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly encompasses all paper or PowerPoint parameters -Free of grammatical & spelling errors -Uses APA in-text citations and reference list IF applicable | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets paper or PowerPoint parameters -1-3 grammatical & spelling errors -Uses some APA in-text citations and reference list IF applicable | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly meet the paper or PowerPoint parameters -Has 4 or more grammatical & spelling errors -does not use APA in-text citations and reference list IF applicable | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission clearly does not meet the required Parameters | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHIPAA Privacy Rule<br>HIPAA Privacy Rule<br>-Clearly identifies any violations relevant to the third-party vendor management<br>CO2 | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **9 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly provides for any violations relevant to the third-party vendor management | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly identifies the violations relevant to the third-party vendor management | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission is off topic or does not clearly identify the violations relevant to the third-party vendor management | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly meet compliance issue audit findings or nothing submitted | | 9 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicy Changes<br>Policy Changes<br>-Clearly identified policy changes that would support vendor management practices<br>-A plan for meeting compliance with privacy regulations<br>CO2 | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **9 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly identified policy changes that would support vendor management practices -A plan for meeting compliance with privacy regulations | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly contains identified policy changes that would support vendor management practices -A plan for meeting compliance with privacy regulations | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly provide policy changes for vendor management practices or a plan for meeting compliance with privacy regulations | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly meet a security measure assessment or nothing submitted | | 9 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrective Actions<br>Corrective Actions<br>-Provides a clear list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve security measures and oversight of third-party vendors<br>CO2 | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission has clear list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve security measures and oversight of third-party vendors | **7 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission contains a mostly clear list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve security measures and oversight of third-party vendors compliance deficiencies | **4 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission may be slightly off topic or does not clearly provide list of corrective actions that should be taken to improve security measures and oversight of third-party vendors | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not clearly give a list of corrective actions or nothing is submitted | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 35 |

  • [Solved] gc to do

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## finalgcu8whattodo.docx **## finalgcu8whattodo.docx** Follow the directions below to write an essay of 1,500-1,750 words on counselor ethical boundaries and practices. Include at least seven scholarly resources including the textbook in your paper. Refer to the NAADAC…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## finalgcu8whattodo.docx

    **## finalgcu8whattodo.docx**

    Follow the directions below to write an essay of 1,500-1,750 words on counselor ethical boundaries and practices. Include at least seven scholarly resources including the textbook in your paper. Refer to the NAADAC Code of Ethics (and the AACC Codes if you are in the Christian Counseling track) when completing this assignment.

    Provide a thoughtful response to each of the following four sections, including specific, concrete examples to illustrate your ideas. Use the section headings provided below to separate each section of your paper.

    This essay should be one cohesive paper with APA headings addressing all four sections along with an introduction and conclusion.

    **Section 1: Boundary Issues and Dual Relationships**

    1. How should a counselor determine if a boundary-crossing or dual relationship is ethical and appropriate? What criteria should be considered?

    2. Present examples of how a substance abuse counselor could apply these criteria to at least four counseling situations in which you believe the dual relationship issues are complex and ambiguous. One of your examples should address the issues of physical attraction between clients and counselors.

    **Section 2: Professional Collaboration in Counseling: Working with a Multidisciplinary Team**

    1. How should a substance abuse counselor work collaboratively within their scope of practice with other mental health professionals to ensure quality client care?

    1. Who should substance abuse counselors expect to work with as part of a multidisciplinary team and what would the role of each person on the team be, including yourself?

    **Section 3: Relationships with Supervisors and Colleagues**

    1. What is the role of clinical supervisors and what are their primary responsibilities?

    1. Describe the ethical issues involved in the supervisor-counselor relationship. How is this relationship similar to the counselor-client relationship? How is it different?

    1. Occasionally, counselors will observe unethical behavior in their colleagues. Describe an unethical behavior that one might see and apply an ethical decision-making model to the scenario. Also, discuss possible decisions, or outcomes of the scenario, which may include: discussing the ethical concerns with the colleague or reporting to the supervisor, counseling association, or licensing board.
    _Use the NAADAC ethical decision-making model in your course materials._

    **Section 4: Development of Your Thinking About Ethics (This section is to be written in first person)**

    Clearly describe what you consider to be the most important developments in your thinking about ethical practice that have occurred during this course. This may include areas in which you have clarified your views and beliefs, modified your thinking on a given issue, gained new insights, or acquired a new perspective. It may include issues whose complexity you now appreciate more fully or difficult issues that you now understand you must grapple with as a counselor. Be sure that you include specific examples to illustrate general statements. This is the only section in which your personal experience has been required. Therefore, you are allowed to use first person in this section only.

    Include at least six scholarly resources in addition to the textbook in your paper.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **_Benchmark Information_**

    _This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:_

    _MS Addiction Counseling; MS Christian Counseling of Substance Abuse and Addictive Disorders_

    _1.2: Analyze independent and collaborative roles of the professional counselor._

    _2.1: Evaluate elements of counselor-client relationships within the practice of professional counseling, focusing on professional ethical standards._

    _5.2: Recognize the importance of establishing and maintaining appropriate professional boundaries._

    _This assignment meets the following NASAC Standards:_

    _20) Understand the addiction professional's obligation to adhere to generally accepted ethical and behavioral standards of conduct in the helping relationship._

    _21) Understand the importance of ongoing supervision and continuing education in the delivery of client services._

    _35) Seek appropriate supervision and consultation._

    _47) Inform the client of his/her confidentiality rights, program procedures that safeguard them, and the exceptions imposed by statute._

    _65) Apply confidentiality-related legal restrictions appropriately._

    _66) Demonstrate respect and nonjudgmental attitudes toward the client in all contacts with other professionals or agencies._

    _110) Protect client rights to privacy and confidentiality in the preparation and handling of records, especially in relation to the communication of client information with third parties._

    _112) Prepare and record treatment and continuing care plans that are consistent with agency standards and comply with applicable administrative rules._

    _116) Demonstrate ethical behaviors by adhering to established professional codes of ethics that define the professional context within which the counselor works, in order to maintain professional standards and safeguard the client._

    _118) Adhere to federal and state laws, and agency regulations, regarding addictions treatment._

    _120) Utilize a range of supervisory options to process personal feelings and concerns about clients._

    _121) Conduct culturally appropriate self-evaluations of professional performance, applying ethical, legal, and professional standards to enhance self-awareness and performance._

    _122) Obtain appropriate continuing professional education._

    _123) Assess and participate in regular supervision and consultation sessions._

    _124) Develop and utilize strategies to maintain physical and mental health._

    **## finalgcu8whattodo.docx**

    Follow the directions below to write an essay of 1,500-1,750 words on counselor ethical boundaries and practices. Include at least seven scholarly resources including the textbook in your paper. Refer to the NAADAC Code of Ethics (and the AACC Codes if you are in the Christian Counseling track) when completing this assignment.

    Provide a thoughtful response to each of the following four sections, including specific, concrete examples to illustrate your ideas. Use the section headings provided below to separate each section of your paper.

    This essay should be one cohesive paper with APA headings addressing all four sections along with an introduction and conclusion.

    **Section 1: Boundary Issues and Dual Relationships**

    1. How should a counselor determine if a boundary-crossing or dual relationship is ethical and appropriate? What criteria should be considered?

    2. Present examples of how a substance abuse counselor could apply these criteria to at least four counseling situations in which you believe the dual relationship issues are complex and ambiguous. One of your examples should address the issues of physical attraction between clients and counselors.

    **Section 2: Professional Collaboration in Counseling: Working with a Multidisciplinary Team**

    1. How should a substance abuse counselor work collaboratively within their scope of practice with other mental health professionals to ensure quality client care?

    1. Who should substance abuse counselors expect to work with as part of a multidisciplinary team and what would the role of each person on the team be, including yourself?

    **Section 3: Relationships with Supervisors and Colleagues**

    1. What is the role of clinical supervisors and what are their primary responsibilities?

    1. Describe the ethical issues involved in the supervisor-counselor relationship. How is this relationship similar to the counselor-client relationship? How is it different?

    1. Occasionally, counselors will observe unethical behavior in their colleagues. Describe an unethical behavior that one might see and apply an ethical decision-making model to the scenario. Also, discuss possible decisions, or outcomes of the scenario, which may include: discussing the ethical concerns with the colleague or reporting to the supervisor, counseling association, or licensing board.
    _Use the NAADAC ethical decision-making model in your course materials._

    **Section 4: Development of Your Thinking About Ethics (This section is to be written in first person)**

    Clearly describe what you consider to be the most important developments in your thinking about ethical practice that have occurred during this course. This may include areas in which you have clarified your views and beliefs, modified your thinking on a given issue, gained new insights, or acquired a new perspective. It may include issues whose complexity you now appreciate more fully or difficult issues that you now understand you must grapple with as a counselor. Be sure that you include specific examples to illustrate general statements. This is the only section in which your personal experience has been required. Therefore, you are allowed to use first person in this section only.

    Include at least six scholarly resources in addition to the textbook in your paper.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **_Benchmark Information_**

    _This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:_

    _MS Addiction Counseling; MS Christian Counseling of Substance Abuse and Addictive Disorders_

    _1.2: Analyze independent and collaborative roles of the professional counselor._

    _2.1: Evaluate elements of counselor-client relationships within the practice of professional counseling, focusing on professional ethical standards._

    _5.2: Recognize the importance of establishing and maintaining appropriate professional boundaries._

    _This assignment meets the following NASAC Standards:_

    _20) Understand the addiction professional's obligation to adhere to generally accepted ethical and behavioral standards of conduct in the helping relationship._

    _21) Understand the importance of ongoing supervision and continuing education in the delivery of client services._

    _35) Seek appropriate supervision and consultation._

    _47) Inform the client of his/her confidentiality rights, program procedures that safeguard them, and the exceptions imposed by statute._

    _65) Apply confidentiality-related legal restrictions appropriately._

    _66) Demonstrate respect and nonjudgmental attitudes toward the client in all contacts with other professionals or agencies._

    _110) Protect client rights to privacy and confidentiality in the preparation and handling of records, especially in relation to the communication of client information with third parties._

    _112) Prepare and record treatment and continuing care plans that are consistent with agency standards and comply with applicable administrative rules._

    _116) Demonstrate ethical behaviors by adhering to established professional codes of ethics that define the professional context within which the counselor works, in order to maintain professional standards and safeguard the client._

    _118) Adhere to federal and state laws, and agency regulations, regarding addictions treatment._

    _120) Utilize a range of supervisory options to process personal feelings and concerns about clients._

    _121) Conduct culturally appropriate self-evaluations of professional performance, applying ethical, legal, and professional standards to enhance self-awareness and performance._

    _122) Obtain appropriate continuing professional education._

    _123) Assess and participate in regular supervision and consultation sessions._

    _124) Develop and utilize strategies to maintain physical and mental health._

  • [Solved] Validating a Resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Validating a Resource** – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx – ## Module3.docx **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx** HIM377 Project Milestone Validating a Resource Name: Directions: Using the space provided below, you wi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Validating a Resource**

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx

    – ## Module3.docx

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

  • [Solved] W2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Will contact tutor – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Will contact tutor

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Case Response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You will be assigned to respond in writing to one state or federal court opinion relating to communication/media law every two weeks. Each written case response will require you to: 1. Summarize the **facts** of the case, the primary legal **issue** or question in the case, the **decision** or rule …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You will be assigned to respond in writing to one state or federal court opinion relating to communication/media law every two weeks. Each written case response will require you to:

    1. Summarize the **facts** of the case, the primary legal **issue** or question in the case, the **decision** or rule announced by the court, the court’s **reasons** for coming to its conclusion. (Please refer to [this sample case brief](https://canvas.uoregon.edu/courses/258119/files/20419546?wrap=1 "How to Brief and Analyze Cases.pdf") [Download this sample case brief](https://canvas.uoregon.edu/courses/258119/files/20419546/download?download_frd=1), which shows what this initial summary or "case brief" generally should look like.);
    2. Respond to the court's reasoning and holding in that case (for example, in a paragraph of 200-300 words) by explaining whether you agree or disagree with the court's holding and reasoning AND explaining why you agree or disagree with the court's decision or some part of the court's reasoning;
    3. Provide the full [Bluebook reference/citationLinks to an external site.](https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/bluebook/citing-cases) to the case.

    You are to **choose one of the legal decisions contained in the assigned readings for the prior two-week period** (those listed under "Cases" in the daily class outline on Canvas; for this week choose one of the cases noted on one of these pages:

    – [Topic 3: Introduction to the First Amendment](https://canvas.uoregon.edu/courses/258119/pages/topic-3-introduction-to-the-first-amendment "Topic 3: Introduction to the First Amendment")
    – [Topic 4: Symbolic Speech and the First Amendment](https://canvas.uoregon.edu/courses/258119/pages/topic-4-the-first-amendment-continued "Topic 4: Symbolic Speech and the First Amendment")

    Then, if necessary, use Thomson Reuters Westlaw or Google Scholar (for example) to locate the full text of the judges' decision and base your brief off of that full decision.

    ## Grading breakdown (out of 25 points):

    1. Summary of the case/case brief: 5 points
    2. Response to the case: 20 points
    3. Missing citation: 5 points (subtracted from the total from the two items above)

    ## Overview of Case Response Assignments

    – [\
    \
    topic-3-introduction-to-the-first-amendment.html](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic-3-introduction-to-the-first-amendment-html "topic-3-introduction-to-the-first-amendment.html")
    – [\
    \
    topic-4-the-first-amendment-continued.html](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic-4-the-first-amendment-continued-html "topic-4-the-first-amendment-continued.html")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] research

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Annotated Bibliography, APA 7th edition Style format. The working title for this Annotated Bibliography is in the attached document. So is the grading rubric – [\ \ AnnotatedBibliographyRubric.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/annotatedbibliographyrubric-docx-10161053 "AnnotatedBibliographyRu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Annotated Bibliography,

    APA 7th edition Style format.

    The working title for this Annotated Bibliography is in the attached document. So is the grading rubric

    – [\
    \
    AnnotatedBibliographyRubric.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/annotatedbibliographyrubric-docx-10161053 "AnnotatedBibliographyRubric.docx")
    – [\
    \
    JusticeandSocialMedia.edited.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/justiceandsocialmedia-edited-docx-10161055 "JusticeandSocialMedia.edited.docx")

    – 2 years ago