Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– ## Rubric.pdf
– ROMCOM.pdf
– Sample.pdf
**## Rubric.pdf**
Week 2: Content Application Assessment
Levels of Achievement
Criteria A=93% to 100% Distinguished B=84% to 92% Proficient C = 75% to 83% Basic
D/F= 74% or below Non-
Performance
Criterion 1: (55 Points/55%) Uses the Community
Assessment Guide to collect
community/neighborhood level data for the
assigned categories; Community People
(Demographics and Health), Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses comparative
data from county and state where indicated. Data
is accurately represented and complete.
Assessment includes an introduction and a
conclusion.
51 to 55 points
Uses the Community Assessment
Guide to collect data for the 3
assigned categories; Community
People, Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses
comparative data from county and
state where indicated. Data is
accurately represented.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.
46 to 50 points
Community assessment guide
includes all required data and
comparative data but may need
more detail/explanation.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.
41 to 45 points
Community assessment guide is utilized
but some data and comparative data are
incomplete or county, state and federal
data are used too frequently for primary
data. May be missing an introduction or a
conclusion.
0 to 40 points
Uses the CAG to display data but a
significant amount of data is in the
wrong category or too broad, OR CAG
is not used and data is not accurate,
relevant /connected to the community.
May be missing both an introduction
and conclusion.
Criterion 2: (25 Points/25%) Displays all data
required in the Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment section in the CAG
to provide context or to make clarifications where
needed.
23.25 to 25 points
Displays all data required in the
Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and
organized manner. Integrates and
applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings,
course content, and discussions.
Uses the comment section in the
CAG to provide context or to make
clarifications where needed.
21 to 23 points
Displays most data in a clear,
concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/
uses skills gained from assigned
readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment
section in the CAG to provide
context or to make clarifications
where needed.
18 to 20 points
Some data is confusing/disorganized,
incomplete or lacks clarity. Stronger
evidence of integration of course content
and outside resources needed. May not
use the comment section to provide
context or make clarifications when
required.
0 to 17 points
Data is mostly disorganized, or
unformatted, lacks clarity and/or
multiple categories are incomplete
throughout. Majority of categories are
incomplete and explanations are not
utilized when needed.
Criterion 3: (10 Points/13%) Includes at least one
reference from this week’s learning and one new,
current (within 3 years), peer-reviewed scholarly
source from the UIC library that is not listed in the
course material. (This is the minimum; other
references can be utilized to provide more
support.) References are related to content.
9.3 to 10 points
Includes at least one reference
from this week’s learning and one
new, current (within 3 years), peer-
reviewed scholarly source from
the UIC library that is not listed in
the course material. (This is the
minimum; other references can be
utilized to provide more support.)
References are related to content.
8.4 to 9.2 points
Includes at least one resource from
the Learning Resources and one
current resource from the UIC
Library on the topic that is peer
reviewed and < 3 years old.
Resource is somewhat appropriate
to the topic. Content included is
synthesized from the resources (not
simply copied and pasted.)
7.5 to 8.3 points
Includes at least one resource from the
Learning Resources and one current
resource from the UIC Library on the topic
that is peer reviewed and < 3 years old.
Content included is mostly synthesized
from the resources but some content lacks
connection and/or some statements in the
paper do not match references.
0 to 7.4 points
Includes only 1 required resource
and/or some statements or data in the
paper do not match references.
Content is not synthesized and/or is
simply copied and pasted with
minimal evidence of connection to
resource or assigned resources are not
utilized as required or references are
not included.
Criterion 4: (10 Points/13 %) Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited. In-text citations have a
corresponding reference listing. Complete and
error-free APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations. Direct
quotations are not used.
9.3 to 10 points
Writing is clear, with appropriate
spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited
appropriately. In-text citations
have a corresponding reference
listing. Complete and error-free
APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations.
Direct quotations are not used.
8.4 to 9.2 points
No more than 2-4 formatting/APA
errors. Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence
structure and punctuation. In- text
citations are used with a
corresponding reference listings
Most data is cited. Direct quotations
are not used.
7.5 to 8.3 points
4-5 formatting, writing, grammar, or APA
errors and/or in-text citations may not be
present or match reference (s). Some data
points not cited. Direct Quotations are not
used
0 to 7.4 points
More than 5 grammar, spelling,
writing, or APA errors and paper is
very difficult to follow due to
structure/formatting issues and/or
direct quotations are used frequently.
In text citations are used
inappropriately, infrequently or
completely omitted where required.
Data is rarely cited or not cited at all.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362
https://uic.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_136031_1&course_id=_257748_1 1/2
View Associated Items
Print Close Window
6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362
https://uic.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_136031_1&course_id=_257748_1 2/2
**ROMCOM.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/romcom-pdf-10388291)
**Sample.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-pdf-10388289)
**Sample.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-pdf-10388289)
**## Rubric.pdf**
Week 2: Content Application Assessment
Levels of Achievement
Criteria A=93% to 100% Distinguished B=84% to 92% Proficient C = 75% to 83% Basic
D/F= 74% or below Non-
Performance
Criterion 1: (55 Points/55%) Uses the Community
Assessment Guide to collect
community/neighborhood level data for the
assigned categories; Community People
(Demographics and Health), Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses comparative
data from county and state where indicated. Data
is accurately represented and complete.
Assessment includes an introduction and a
conclusion.
51 to 55 points
Uses the Community Assessment
Guide to collect data for the 3
assigned categories; Community
People, Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses
comparative data from county and
state where indicated. Data is
accurately represented.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.
46 to 50 points
Community assessment guide
includes all required data and
comparative data but may need
more detail/explanation.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.
41 to 45 points
Community assessment guide is utilized
but some data and comparative data are
incomplete or county, state and federal
data are used too frequently for primary
data. May be missing an introduction or a
conclusion.
0 to 40 points
Uses the CAG to display data but a
significant amount of data is in the
wrong category or too broad, OR CAG
is not used and data is not accurate,
relevant /connected to the community.
May be missing both an introduction
and conclusion.
Criterion 2: (25 Points/25%) Displays all data
required in the Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment section in the CAG
to provide context or to make clarifications where
needed.
23.25 to 25 points
Displays all data required in the
Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and
organized manner. Integrates and
applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings,
course content, and discussions.
Uses the comment section in the
CAG to provide context or to make
clarifications where needed.
21 to 23 points
Displays most data in a clear,
concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/
uses skills gained from assigned
readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment
section in the CAG to provide
context or to make clarifications
where needed.
18 to 20 points
Some data is confusing/disorganized,
incomplete or lacks clarity. Stronger
evidence of integration of course content
and outside resources needed. May not
use the comment section to provide
context or make clarifications when
required.
0 to 17 points
Data is mostly disorganized, or
unformatted, lacks clarity and/or
multiple categories are incomplete
throughout. Majority of categories are
incomplete and explanations are not
utilized when needed.
Criterion 3: (10 Points/13%) Includes at least one
reference from this week’s learning and one new,
current (within 3 years), peer-reviewed scholarly
source from the UIC library that is not listed in the
course material. (This is the minimum; other
references can be utilized to provide more
support.) References are related to content.
9.3 to 10 points
Includes at least one reference
from this week’s learning and one
new, current (within 3 years), peer-
reviewed scholarly source from
the UIC library that is not listed in
the course material. (This is the
minimum; other references can be
utilized to provide more support.)
References are related to content.
8.4 to 9.2 points
Includes at least one resource from
the Learning Resources and one
current resource from the UIC
Library on the topic that is peer
reviewed and < 3 years old.
Resource is somewhat appropriate
to the topic. Content included is
synthesized from the resources (not
simply copied and pasted.)
7.5 to 8.3 points
Includes at least one resource from the
Learning Resources and one current
resource from the UIC Library on the topic
that is peer reviewed and < 3 years old.
Content included is mostly synthesized
from the resources but some content lacks
connection and/or some statements in the
paper do not match references.
0 to 7.4 points
Includes only 1 required resource
and/or some statements or data in the
paper do not match references.
Content is not synthesized and/or is
simply copied and pasted with
minimal evidence of connection to
resource or assigned resources are not
utilized as required or references are
not included.
Criterion 4: (10 Points/13 %) Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited. In-text citations have a
corresponding reference listing. Complete and
error-free APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations. Direct
quotations are not used.
9.3 to 10 points
Writing is clear, with appropriate
spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited
appropriately. In-text citations
have a corresponding reference
listing. Complete and error-free
APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations.
Direct quotations are not used.
8.4 to 9.2 points
No more than 2-4 formatting/APA
errors. Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence
structure and punctuation. In- text
citations are used with a
corresponding reference listings
Most data is cited. Direct quotations
are not used.
7.5 to 8.3 points
4-5 formatting, writing, grammar, or APA
errors and/or in-text citations may not be
present or match reference (s). Some data
points not cited. Direct Quotations are not
used
0 to 7.4 points
More than 5 grammar, spelling,
writing, or APA errors and paper is
very difficult to follow due to
structure/formatting issues and/or
direct quotations are used frequently.
In text citations are used
inappropriately, infrequently or
completely omitted where required.
Data is rarely cited or not cited at all.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362
https://uic.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_136031_1&course_id=_257748_1 1/2
View Associated Items
Print Close Window
6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362
https://uic.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_136031_1&course_id=_257748_1 2/2
**ROMCOM.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/romcom-pdf-10388291)
**Sample.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-pdf-10388289)
**## Rubric.pdf**
Week 2: Content Application Assessment
Levels of Achievement
Criteria A=93% to 100% Distinguished B=84% to 92% Proficient C = 75% to 83% Basic
D/F= 74% or below Non-
Performance
Criterion 1: (55 Points/55%) Uses the Community
Assessment Guide to collect
community/neighborhood level data for the
assigned categories; Community People
(Demographics and Health), Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses comparative
data from county and state where indicated. Data
is accurately represented and complete.
Assessment includes an introduction and a
conclusion.
51 to 55 points
Uses the Community Assessment
Guide to collect data for the 3
assigned categories; Community
People, Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses
comparative data from county and
state where indicated. Data is
accurately represented.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.
46 to 50 points
Community assessment guide
includes all required data and
comparative data but may need
more detail/explanation.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.
41 to 45 points
Community assessment guide is utilized
but some data and comparative data are
incomplete or county, state and federal
data are used too frequently for primary
data. May be missing an introduction or a
conclusion.
0 to 40 points
Uses the CAG to display data but a
significant amount of data is in the
wrong category or too broad, OR CAG
is not used and data is not accurate,
relevant /connected to the community.
May be missing both an introduction
and conclusion.
Criterion 2: (25 Points/25%) Displays all data
required in the Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment section in the CAG
to provide context or to make clarifications where
needed.
23.25 to 25 points
Displays all data required in the
Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and
organized manner. Integrates and
applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings,
course content, and discussions.
Uses the comment section in the
CAG to provide context or to make
clarifications where needed.
21 to 23 points
Displays most data in a clear,
concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/
uses skills gained from assigned
readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment
section in the CAG to provide
context or to make clarifications
where needed.
18 to 20 points
Some data is confusing/disorganized,
incomplete or lacks clarity. Stronger
evidence of integration of course content
and outside resources needed. May not
use the comment section to provide
context or make clarifications when
required.
0 to 17 points
Data is mostly disorganized, or
unformatted, lacks clarity and/or
multiple categories are incomplete
throughout. Majority of categories are
incomplete and explanations are not
utilized when needed.
Criterion 3: (10 Points/13%) Includes at least one
reference from this week’s learning and one new,
current (within 3 years), peer-reviewed scholarly
source from the UIC library that is not listed in the
course material. (This is the minimum; other
references can be utilized to provide more
support.) References are related to content.
9.3 to 10 points
Includes at least one reference
from this week’s learning and one
new, current (within 3 years), peer-
reviewed scholarly source from
the UIC library that is not listed in
the course material. (This is the
minimum; other references can be
utilized to provide more support.)
References are related to content.
8.4 to 9.2 points
Includes at least one resource from
the Learning Resources and one
current resource from the UIC
Library on the topic that is peer
reviewed and < 3 years old.
Resource is somewhat appropriate
to the topic. Content included is
synthesized from the resources (not
simply copied and pasted.)
7.5 to 8.3 points
Includes at least one resource from the
Learning Resources and one current
resource from the UIC Library on the topic
that is peer reviewed and < 3 years old.
Content included is mostly synthesized
from the resources but some content lacks
connection and/or some statements in the
paper do not match references.
0 to 7.4 points
Includes only 1 required resource
and/or some statements or data in the
paper do not match references.
Content is not synthesized and/or is
simply copied and pasted with
minimal evidence of connection to
resource or assigned resources are not
utilized as required or references are
not included.
Criterion 4: (10 Points/13 %) Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited. In-text citations have a
corresponding reference listing. Complete and
error-free APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations. Direct
quotations are not used.
9.3 to 10 points
Writing is clear, with appropriate
spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited
appropriately. In-text citations
have a corresponding reference
listing. Complete and error-free
APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations.
Direct quotations are not used.
8.4 to 9.2 points
No more than 2-4 formatting/APA
errors. Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence
structure and punctuation. In- text
citations are used with a
corresponding reference listings
Most data is cited. Direct quotations
are not used.
7.5 to 8.3 points
4-5 formatting, writing, grammar, or APA
errors and/or in-text citations may not be
present or match reference (s). Some data
points not cited. Direct Quotations are not
used
0 to 7.4 points
More than 5 grammar, spelling,
writing, or APA errors and paper is
very difficult to follow due to
structure/formatting issues and/or
direct quotations are used frequently.
In text citations are used
inappropriately, infrequently or
completely omitted where required.
Data is rarely cited or not cited at all.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362
https://uic.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_136031_1&course_id=_257748_1 1/2
View Associated Items
Print Close Window
6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362
https://uic.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_136031_1&course_id=_257748_1 2/2
**ROMCOM.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/romcom-pdf-10388291)
**Sample.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-pdf-10388289)
– 1
– 2
– 3