Tag: Pathophysiology & Pharmacology

  • [Solved] laws in your State designed to protect older adults from elder abuse and guide the practice of adult protective services agencies.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering laws in your State designed to protect older adults from elder abuse and guide the practice of adult protective services agencies..

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Your Experience & Research Articles416-4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe your experience with reading research articles. Share an example of an article that has been useful and applicable to your practice based on your readings. Share an example of an article (or information) that was not helpful. Provide rationale through critiquing and evaluating the strengths…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe your experience with reading research articles.

    Share an example of an article that has been useful and applicable to your practice based on your readings.  Share an example of an article (or information) that was not helpful.

    Provide rationale through critiquing and evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the articles.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

    ***NO AI , Turnitin report****

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] XP02DQGOOD

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## APASTYLE.docx **## APASTYLE.docx** **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES** 1. How might policy impact healthcare? 2. What is the role of ethics in policymaking and healthcare? **## APASTYLE.docx** **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES** 1. How might policy imp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## APASTYLE.docx

    **## APASTYLE.docx**

    **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES**

    1. How might policy impact healthcare?

    2. What is the role of ethics in policymaking and healthcare?

    **## APASTYLE.docx**

    **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES**

    1. How might policy impact healthcare?

    2. What is the role of ethics in policymaking and healthcare?

  • [Solved] Wkx disc ay

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Post an explanation of your choice of a nursing specialty within the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your choice, and the factors that drove/are driving your decision. Identify at least one professional organization affiliated with your chosen specialty and pro…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Post an explanation of your choice of a nursing specialty within the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your choice, and the factors that drove/are driving your decision. Identify at least one professional organization affiliated with your chosen specialty and provide details on becoming a member.**

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Week 4ass

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Directions:** In this assignment, you will complete the **Evidence Paper** which is the draft of the Dissemination of Evidence Video Presentation. Use the APA student paper template provided to write this paper. Review your instructor response to your clinical question on the Week 4 discussion boa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Directions:**

    In this assignment, you will complete the **Evidence Paper** which is the draft of the Dissemination of Evidence Video Presentation. Use the APA student paper template provided to write this paper.

    Review your instructor response to your clinical question on the Week 4 discussion board for guidance **before** you start this assignment.

    To promote success, it is recommended that you send your clinical question that includes a nursing intervention within your scope of practice and 3 research articles as an attachment via email to your instructor for review by Wednesday in week 4.

    **Use this template:** [Evidence Paper Template 11.2023.docx](https://classroom.galencollege.edu/courses/7097019/files/309673279?wrap=1 "Evidence Paper Template 11.2023.docx") [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader-na.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=7255&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F7594ae20-59ff-48f0-941c-9a905e679664%2FEvidence%2520Paper%2520Template%252011.2023.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzgwMDQ3MzIsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzc1OTRhZTIwLTU5ZmYtNDhmMC05NDFjLTlhOTA1ZTY3OTY2NC9FdmlkZW5jZSUyMFBhcGVyJTIwVGVtcGxhdGUlMjAxMS4yMDIzLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiJhMWIyNmE3ZS01YmFkLTRkMmYtODgxYy05M2E1OGVmZWU5ZjQiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzgwOTExMzJ9.qVfYkPw2aRFu1yTpFty-Vxt4GO4DNrY02v-bY6nGRVxw4-CVbxZomsxcQ4P36T9do7bi6AoOO2BZhnYNLt-qRg "Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader") [Download Evidence Paper Template 11.2023.docx](https://classroom.galencollege.edu/courses/7097019/files/309673279/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader-na.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=7255&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F7594ae20-59ff-48f0-941c-9a905e679664%2FEvidence%2520Paper%2520Template%252011.2023.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzgwMDQ5MTIsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzc1OTRhZTIwLTU5ZmYtNDhmMC05NDFjLTlhOTA1ZTY3OTY2NC9FdmlkZW5jZSUyMFBhcGVyJTIwVGVtcGxhdGUlMjAxMS4yMDIzLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI0M2RjNDNlMy04NzQ5LTQ4ZWYtODIwNy0yYWFkZGRkMGYxNDUiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzgwOTEzMTJ9.aUNESc31PxFMQYoNwjKbP3h7uP9XeeUOtcHSiYAE5nd_FaajG7RhNDYUb9J_Qwf_xxg5bXaR1FqtGbbLZXEiTQ "Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader")

    – The clinical question should be written using the intervention format: _In elderly patients (P), how does the implementation of a fall risk protocol (I) compared to none (C), affect the number of falls (O) within hospitalization (T)?_
    – Use your clinical question to create keywords and complete a literature search using the Galen library database. Start early in the week so that you can contact the Galen librarian for guidance on searching the databases as needed. The librarians are available online via live chat or by placing a support ticket.
    – Find and save full text (PDF) of 3 research articles (primary or secondary research studies based on high levels of evidence) dated within the past 5 years. Do **not** use lower levels of evidence articles such as quality improvement project, scoping review, literature review or integrative review.
    – Select articles that show your nursing intervention is effective in achieving your desired outcome stated in your clinical question. _For example, if you plan to implement yoga as a nursing intervention to enhance weight loss, all 3 studies must find (reported under the results/findings section) that yoga is an effective weight-loss strategy. If you cannot find studies to support your intervention and outcome, consider the need to edit your intervention and outcome within the clinical question.  Then, repeat the literature search using the revised keywords._
    – Use a total of 4 sources, including the 3 research articles and the assigned course textbook.
    – Use 1 to 2 short, direct quotes and multiple paraphrases as supportive evidence throughout the paper with in-text citations and matching references formatted in APA style.
    – Each short, direct quote should contain less than 20 words.
    – Each paragraph should contain a minimum of 4 sentences and a maximum of 6 to 8 sentences.

    – [\
    \
    EvidencePaperTemplate11.2023.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evidencepapertemplate11-2023-docx-10170353 "EvidencePaperTemplate11.2023.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] help with discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Advanced practice nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for application to practice. Select one current single-study qualitative scholarly article related to your PICOT question. Appraise the article using the Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitativ…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Advanced practice nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for application to practice. Select one current single-study qualitative scholarly article related to your PICOT question. Appraise the article using the Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023, Appendix C). Summarize your appraisal of the article in your own words.

    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-29at12.13.59AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-29at12-13-59am-png "Screenshot2025-01-29at12.13.59AM.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Case Study Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Case Study Help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] weekly clinical experience

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe your clinical experience for this week as a student nurse practitioner in women's health clinic – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possibl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe your clinical experience for this week as a student nurse practitioner in women's health clinic

    – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
    – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
    – Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
    – What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
    – Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Women and Men’s Health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Will need to get a hint for the questions , See attachment – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## week9casereview.docx **## week9casereview.docx** Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and hea…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Will need to get a hint for the questions , See attachment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## week9casereview.docx

    **## week9casereview.docx**

    Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and health histories.

    For this Assignment, you evaluate drug treatment plans for patients with various disorders and justify drug therapy plans based on patient history and diagnosis.

    Review assignment rubric and case studies. Be sure to thoroughly answer ALL

    Explain the problem and discuss how you would address the problem.

    When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route, frequency, special instructions, # dispensed (days supply), refills, etc. Also state if you would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications.

    Answer questions using your required learning resources, clinical practice guidelines, Medscape and JNC 8.

    Include at least three references to support each scenario and cite them in APA format. Please include in-text citations. You do not need an introduction or conclusion paragraph.

    WEEK 9 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 9-11)

    SCENARIO 1

    RT is a 34-year-old pregnant female at 20 weeks gestation. She presents to the clinic with painful urination, increased urge to urinate, and fatigue. A urine dipstick test is positive for a UTI and she is started on doxycycline 100 mg po BID x 7 days. Current medications include labetalol 100 mg po BID, fluoxetine 20 mg po daily, and valacyclovir 500 mg po daily. She has no drug allergies. Labs include Hgb 12.5, HCT 37%, K 3.9, glucose 78, BUN 9, Cr 0.7 Her blood pressure is 130/75 mmHg. What treatment plan would you implement for RT (include complete medication order)? What patient education would you provide and how would you monitor drug therapy? Do pregnant patients have increased or decreased blood plasma volume?

    SCENARIO 2

    GP is a 21-year-old female presenting with thick white, odorless vaginal discharge and itching for 3 days. She is sexually active and has had unprotected sex with a new male partner for the last month. Current medications include ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel 30 mcg/0.3 mg po daily and alprazolam 2 mg po TID prn. This patient is allergic to sulfa drugs. What medication would you prescribe for this patient (include complete medication order)? How long should GP abstain from sexual activity? What patient education would you provide? What possible drug interactions exist?

    SCENARIO 3

    LW is a 66-year-old male seen in the clinic today. He presents with extreme fatigue, brain fog, minor sore throat and temperature of 100.8. He reports that symptoms began two days ago with a sore throat and have progressively worsened. He also mentions loss of appetite. Oxygen sat 96%, respiratory rate 18, bp 130/80. His rapid COVID-19 antigen test is positive. Chest x-ray is clear, no signs of pneumonia. What treatment plan would you implement for LW (include complete medication order)? What education would you provide? Discuss one potential drug interaction and how you would manage it.

    SCENARIO 4

    FS is a 35-year-old female trying to conceive with a medical history of PCOS. Her labs today show a MCV 77, MCHC 26, Ferritin 9, TIBC 415, BG 90 mg/dL, A1C 5% Current medications include metformin 500 mg po BID and a B vitamin complex. What treatment plan would you implement for FS? Why is this patient on metformin? How would you monitor this patient’s response to the medication? What patient education would you provide?

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 pts

    Excellent

    Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 pts

    Complete

    Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    Scenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 pts

    Excellent

    Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

    Scenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 pts

    Complete

    Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    Scenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    Scenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 pts

    Excellent

    Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

    Scenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 pts

    Complete

    Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    Scenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    Scenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 pts

    Excellent

    Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

    Scenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 pts

    Complete

    Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    Scenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    **## week9casereview.docx**

    Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and health histories.

    For this Assignment, you evaluate drug treatment plans for patients with various disorders and justify drug therapy plans based on patient history and diagnosis.

    Review assignment rubric and case studies. Be sure to thoroughly answer ALL

    Explain the problem and discuss how you would address the problem.

    When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route, frequency, special instructions, # dispensed (days supply), refills, etc. Also state if you would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications.

    Answer questions using your required learning resources, clinical practice guidelines, Medscape and JNC 8.

    Include at least three references to support each scenario and cite them in APA format. Please include in-text citations. You do not need an introduction or conclusion paragraph.

    WEEK 9 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 9-11)

    SCENARIO 1

    RT is a 34-year-old pregnant female at 20 weeks gestation. She presents to the clinic with painful urination, increased urge to urinate, and fatigue. A urine dipstick test is positive for a UTI and she is started on doxycycline 100 mg po BID x 7 days. Current medications include labetalol 100 mg po BID, fluoxetine 20 mg po daily, and valacyclovir 500 mg po daily. She has no drug allergies. Labs include Hgb 12.5, HCT 37%, K 3.9, glucose 78, BUN 9, Cr 0.7 Her blood pressure is 130/75 mmHg. What treatment plan would you implement for RT (include complete medication order)? What patient education would you provide and how would you monitor drug therapy? Do pregnant patients have increased or decreased blood plasma volume?

    SCENARIO 2

    GP is a 21-year-old female presenting with thick white, odorless vaginal discharge and itching for 3 days. She is sexually active and has had unprotected sex with a new male partner for the last month. Current medications include ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel 30 mcg/0.3 mg po daily and alprazolam 2 mg po TID prn. This patient is allergic to sulfa drugs. What medication would you prescribe for this patient (include complete medication order)? How long should GP abstain from sexual activity? What patient education would you provide? What possible drug interactions exist?

    SCENARIO 3

    LW is a 66-year-old male seen in the clinic today. He presents with extreme fatigue, brain fog, minor sore throat and temperature of 100.8. He reports that symptoms began two days ago with a sore throat and have progressively worsened. He also mentions loss of appetite. Oxygen sat 96%, respiratory rate 18, bp 130/80. His rapid COVID-19 antigen test is positive. Chest x-ray is clear, no signs of pneumonia. What treatment plan would you implement for LW (include complete medication order)? What education would you provide? Discuss one potential drug interaction and how you would manage it.

    SCENARIO 4

    FS is a 35-year-old female trying to conceive with a medical history of PCOS. Her labs today show a MCV 77, MCHC 26, Ferritin 9, TIBC 415, BG 90 mg/dL, A1C 5% Current medications include metformin 500 mg po BID and a B vitamin complex. What treatment plan would you implement for FS? Why is this patient on metformin? How would you monitor this patient’s response to the medication? What patient education would you provide?

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 pts

    Excellent

    Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 pts

    Complete

    Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    Scenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 pts

    Excellent

    Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

    Scenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 pts

    Complete

    Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    Scenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    Scenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 pts

    Excellent

    Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

    Scenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 pts

    Complete

    Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    Scenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    Scenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 pts

    Excellent

    Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

    Scenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 pts

    Complete

    Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    Scenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

  • [Solved] Evidence-Based Practice II

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## respond.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.odt **## respond.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.odt** **Evidence Based Practice II** **Due Jan 30, 2025** Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation **Read…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## respond.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.odt

    **## respond.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.odt**

    **Evidence Based Practice II**

    **Due Jan 30, 2025**

    Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ blog posts.
    **Respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues by expanding on their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.

    PEER #1

    [Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142884/users/125106)

    Jan 28 7:41pm

    Manage Discussion by Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye

    Reply from Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye

    **Introduction**

    Restraints and seclusions are restrictive interventions commonly used in psychiatric inpatient units, including those for children and adolescents, to address situations involving imminent risk of harm to the patient or others. However, these methods remain controversial due to their association with significant adverse effects, including injuries and fatalities among both patients and staff (Kersting et al., 2019). Effectively addressing challenges in behavioral health requires a proactive approach grounded in innovative strategies that prioritize education, collaboration, and evidence-based practices. My project, which focused on training mental health staff in de-escalation techniques to reduce the use of restraints, highlighted the complexities of behavioral health management. By identifying key barriers such as knowledge gaps, communication breakdowns, and systemic inefficiencies, the project underscored the critical need for customized interventions. These targeted strategies are essential to overcoming challenges and fostering safer, more therapeutic environments for both patients and staff.

    **Lesson Learned from Project Implementation and Evaluation**

    Reflecting on project implementation and evaluation is essential for identifying successes and areas for improvement. A key lesson learned is the importance of stakeholder engagement to ensure alignment and buy-in throughout the project. Self-analysis and evaluation are equally critical for assessing the effectiveness of changes, staff acceptance, and project sustainability. This includes examining how barriers were addressed and considering alternative approaches. Notably, the impact of program changes may not be immediately apparent; for instance, improved reporting practices might initially increase recorded restraint incidents (Clark, 2011). Effective evaluation requires evidence-based methods. This project incorporates several strategies, including pre- and post-tests to measure staff knowledge and perceptions, comparisons of restraint incident rates before and after implementation, and staff surveys to gather feedback on the program. These evaluations aim to identify effective strategies and ensure the program remains aligned with its goals.

    **Factors for Sustaining Change**

    Transforming an organization’s culture as a strategic priority requires comprehensive strategic and operational adjustments across the organization (Doherty et al., 2022). To achieve sustainable change, it is crucial to embed new practices within the organizational culture, emphasizing ongoing learning and seamless integration of restraint prevention initiatives. Regular training sessions play a key role in reinforcing these efforts, ensuring adherence to high standards while enabling the organization to remain responsive to process updates or technological advancements. Strong leadership support is vital in driving commitment, allocating necessary resources, and providing a solid foundation for sustaining long-term change. Establishing a dedicated group, such as a restraint prevention committee, to oversee the program will enhance sustainability by managing restraint episode reporting, tracking monthly restraint rates, and maintaining up-to-date policies and materials. Furthermore, utilizing a Quality Improvement Model, such as the PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) approach, ensures that restraint prevention interventions remain on track. This model facilitates continuous improvement by identifying areas for refinement and optimizing the implementation of changes over time (Bell & Gallacher, 2016).

    **Sustaining the Translation**

    To promote consistency and reliability, it is essential to develop comprehensive, clear, and easily accessible documentation for all processes and updates. Such documentation serves as a central reference point, ensuring that all stakeholders have a shared understanding of procedures and can execute tasks with accuracy and uniformity. Equally important is the establishment of continuous feedback mechanisms, which provide opportunities for regular assessment and improvement. By actively seeking input from team members, stakeholders, or end users, you can identify potential challenges, uncover inefficiencies, and make timely adjustments. These mechanisms not only help maintain the relevance of the implementation but also foster a culture of collaboration and adaptability. By prioritizing these strategies robust documentation and continuous feedback you create a strong foundation for the ongoing evaluation and optimization of your project. This approach ensures its long-term effectiveness, maximizes its impact, and enhances sustainability, enabling the project to adapt to evolving needs and deliver lasting value.

    **Conclusion**

    Every episode of restraint or seclusion is harmful to the individual and humiliating to staff members who understand their job responsibilities. The importance of ongoing evaluation has become evident, emphasizing the necessity of continuous monitoring, feedback, and adaptation to address evolving needs. This dynamic process strengthens best practices while facilitating the early detection of challenges, allowing for timely and effective interventions. Together, these insights highlight the transformative potential within behavioral health when education, collaboration, and evidence-based strategies are prioritized—ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and elevating the quality of care.

    **References**

    Bell, A., Gallacher, N. (2016). Succeeding in Sustained Reduction in the use of Restraint using the Improvement Model. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 5(1): u211050.w4430. doi: 10.1136/bmjqualityu211050. w4430. PMID: 27335641; PMCID: PMC4915305.

    Clark J. (2011). Let's reflect: What is the point? British Journal of General Practice, 61(593), 747. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232 Links to an external site.

    Doherty, J.A., Johnson, M., McPheron, H. (2022). Advancing health equity through organizational change: Perspectives from health care leaders. Health Care Manage Rev.  01;47(3):263-270. doi: 10.1097/HMR. 0000000000000326. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PMID: 34456273; PMCID: PMC9162074.

    Kersting, XAK., Hirsch, S., Steinert, T. (2019). Physical harm and death in the context of coercive measures in psychiatric patients: a systematic review. Front Psychol.10:400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00400.

    – Reply to post from Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye
    **Reply**

    – Mark as Unread
    **Mark as Unread**

    **PEER #2**

    [Oluwakemi Aregbesola](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142884/users/120216)

    Jan 28 6:04pm

    Manage Discussion by Oluwakemi Aregbesola

    Reply from Oluwakemi Aregbesola

    **Week 10 Blog: Main Post**

    The project is a staff educational project on improving discharge planning to reduce patient no-shows among individuals with alcohol use disorder who receive treatment at an outpatient mental health clinic.

    **Lessons on Project Implementation and Evaluation**

                The project implementation process has brought to light several lessons for me. I appreciated the role of having a change agent from the facility. I was able to request the assistance of a nurse practitioner at the project site, and she was impactful as a change agent in influencing the participation of the providers at the site in the staff educational sessions and implementing the project intervention (Ericson Lidman & Strandberg, 2023). Adopting a transformative leadership approach during project implementation assisted me in motivating the providers to implement the intervention. Further, building trust and promoting teaming strategies with the providers was essential in obtaining support for the practice change intervention (Bohnenkamp et al., 2023). I also appreciated the impact of planning for potential barriers to implementation. For example, I foresaw participation challenges due to differences in working shifts. I planned to address the challenge by developing educational sessions to accommodate shift differences. The above intervention worked well, and I educated all the staff working at the project site. The project outcomes were evaluated through quantitative analysis. The knowledge levels of the participants were analyzed through a paired t-test to determine the significance of the difference between pre-and post-interventional outcomes.

    **Sustainability**

                The factors influencing sustainability include stakeholder buy-in for the project, incorporation into routine interventions within the project site, and monitoring the implementation of the intervention to promote long-term implementation (Urquhart et al., 2021). Stakeholders buy-in and leadership support for the intervention will promote facility-wide support for the intervention, leading to the adoption of the intervention and long-term implementation. Incorporation of the practice change into routine practice intervention will advance the facility culture for evidence-based interventions, thereby promoting the long-term sustainability of the intervention. Monitoring the intervention implementation will assist in identifying backsliding, gaps, or inconsistencies in the practice change intervention, thereby informing interventions to promote sustained implementation of the intervention, such as through additional staff education interventions or educating new staff during the induction process to promote awareness of the practice change.

    **References**

    Bohnenkamp, J. H., Patel, C., Connors, E., Orenstein, S., Ereshefsky, S., Lever, N., & Hoover, S. (2023). Evaluating strategies to promote effective, multidisciplinary team collaboration in school mental health.
    _Journal of Applied School Psychology_,
    _39_(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2022.2077875

    Ericson Lidman, E., & Strandberg, G. (2023). Meanings of being a change agent in implementing a new organizational culture in home care services: A phenomenological hermeneutic study.
    _Nordic Journal of Nursing Research_. https://doi.org/10.1177/20571585231157505

    Urquhart, R., Kendell, C., Cornelissen, E., Powell, B. J., Madden, L. L., Kissmann, G., Richmond, S. A., & Bender, J. L. (2021). Identifying factors influencing sustainability of innovations in cancer survivorship care: A qualitative study.
    _BMJ Open_,
    _11_(2), Article e042503. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042503

    – Reply to post from Oluwakemi Aregbesola
    **Reply**

    – Mark as Unread
    **Mark as Unread**

    **## respond.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.odt**

    **Evidence Based Practice II**

    **Due Jan 30, 2025**

    Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ blog posts.
    **Respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues by expanding on their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.

    PEER #1

    [Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142884/users/125106)

    Jan 28 7:41pm

    Manage Discussion by Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye

    Reply from Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye

    **Introduction**

    Restraints and seclusions are restrictive interventions commonly used in psychiatric inpatient units, including those for children and adolescents, to address situations involving imminent risk of harm to the patient or others. However, these methods remain controversial due to their association with significant adverse effects, including injuries and fatalities among both patients and staff (Kersting et al., 2019). Effectively addressing challenges in behavioral health requires a proactive approach grounded in innovative strategies that prioritize education, collaboration, and evidence-based practices. My project, which focused on training mental health staff in de-escalation techniques to reduce the use of restraints, highlighted the complexities of behavioral health management. By identifying key barriers such as knowledge gaps, communication breakdowns, and systemic inefficiencies, the project underscored the critical need for customized interventions. These targeted strategies are essential to overcoming challenges and fostering safer, more therapeutic environments for both patients and staff.

    **Lesson Learned from Project Implementation and Evaluation**

    Reflecting on project implementation and evaluation is essential for identifying successes and areas for improvement. A key lesson learned is the importance of stakeholder engagement to ensure alignment and buy-in throughout the project. Self-analysis and evaluation are equally critical for assessing the effectiveness of changes, staff acceptance, and project sustainability. This includes examining how barriers were addressed and considering alternative approaches. Notably, the impact of program changes may not be immediately apparent; for instance, improved reporting practices might initially increase recorded restraint incidents (Clark, 2011). Effective evaluation requires evidence-based methods. This project incorporates several strategies, including pre- and post-tests to measure staff knowledge and perceptions, comparisons of restraint incident rates before and after implementation, and staff surveys to gather feedback on the program. These evaluations aim to identify effective strategies and ensure the program remains aligned with its goals.

    **Factors for Sustaining Change**

    Transforming an organization’s culture as a strategic priority requires comprehensive strategic and operational adjustments across the organization (Doherty et al., 2022). To achieve sustainable change, it is crucial to embed new practices within the organizational culture, emphasizing ongoing learning and seamless integration of restraint prevention initiatives. Regular training sessions play a key role in reinforcing these efforts, ensuring adherence to high standards while enabling the organization to remain responsive to process updates or technological advancements. Strong leadership support is vital in driving commitment, allocating necessary resources, and providing a solid foundation for sustaining long-term change. Establishing a dedicated group, such as a restraint prevention committee, to oversee the program will enhance sustainability by managing restraint episode reporting, tracking monthly restraint rates, and maintaining up-to-date policies and materials. Furthermore, utilizing a Quality Improvement Model, such as the PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) approach, ensures that restraint prevention interventions remain on track. This model facilitates continuous improvement by identifying areas for refinement and optimizing the implementation of changes over time (Bell & Gallacher, 2016).

    **Sustaining the Translation**

    To promote consistency and reliability, it is essential to develop comprehensive, clear, and easily accessible documentation for all processes and updates. Such documentation serves as a central reference point, ensuring that all stakeholders have a shared understanding of procedures and can execute tasks with accuracy and uniformity. Equally important is the establishment of continuous feedback mechanisms, which provide opportunities for regular assessment and improvement. By actively seeking input from team members, stakeholders, or end users, you can identify potential challenges, uncover inefficiencies, and make timely adjustments. These mechanisms not only help maintain the relevance of the implementation but also foster a culture of collaboration and adaptability. By prioritizing these strategies robust documentation and continuous feedback you create a strong foundation for the ongoing evaluation and optimization of your project. This approach ensures its long-term effectiveness, maximizes its impact, and enhances sustainability, enabling the project to adapt to evolving needs and deliver lasting value.

    **Conclusion**

    Every episode of restraint or seclusion is harmful to the individual and humiliating to staff members who understand their job responsibilities. The importance of ongoing evaluation has become evident, emphasizing the necessity of continuous monitoring, feedback, and adaptation to address evolving needs. This dynamic process strengthens best practices while facilitating the early detection of challenges, allowing for timely and effective interventions. Together, these insights highlight the transformative potential within behavioral health when education, collaboration, and evidence-based strategies are prioritized—ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and elevating the quality of care.

    **References**

    Bell, A., Gallacher, N. (2016). Succeeding in Sustained Reduction in the use of Restraint using the Improvement Model. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 5(1): u211050.w4430. doi: 10.1136/bmjqualityu211050. w4430. PMID: 27335641; PMCID: PMC4915305.

    Clark J. (2011). Let's reflect: What is the point? British Journal of General Practice, 61(593), 747. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232 Links to an external site.

    Doherty, J.A., Johnson, M., McPheron, H. (2022). Advancing health equity through organizational change: Perspectives from health care leaders. Health Care Manage Rev.  01;47(3):263-270. doi: 10.1097/HMR. 0000000000000326. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PMID: 34456273; PMCID: PMC9162074.

    Kersting, XAK., Hirsch, S., Steinert, T. (2019). Physical harm and death in the context of coercive measures in psychiatric patients: a systematic review. Front Psychol.10:400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00400.

    – Reply to post from Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye
    **Reply**

    – Mark as Unread
    **Mark as Unread**

    **PEER #2**

    [Oluwakemi Aregbesola](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142884/users/120216)

    Jan 28 6:04pm

    Manage Discussion by Oluwakemi Aregbesola

    Reply from Oluwakemi Aregbesola

    **Week 10 Blog: Main Post**

    The project is a staff educational project on improving discharge planning to reduce patient no-shows among individuals with alcohol use disorder who receive treatment at an outpatient mental health clinic.

    **Lessons on Project Implementation and Evaluation**

                The project implementation process has brought to light several lessons for me. I appreciated the role of having a change agent from the facility. I was able to request the assistance of a nurse practitioner at the project site, and she was impactful as a change agent in influencing the participation of the providers at the site in the staff educational sessions and implementing the project intervention (Ericson Lidman & Strandberg, 2023). Adopting a transformative leadership approach during project implementation assisted me in motivating the providers to implement the intervention. Further, building trust and promoting teaming strategies with the providers was essential in obtaining support for the practice change intervention (Bohnenkamp et al., 2023). I also appreciated the impact of planning for potential barriers to implementation. For example, I foresaw participation challenges due to differences in working shifts. I planned to address the challenge by developing educational sessions to accommodate shift differences. The above intervention worked well, and I educated all the staff working at the project site. The project outcomes were evaluated through quantitative analysis. The knowledge levels of the participants were analyzed through a paired t-test to determine the significance of the difference between pre-and post-interventional outcomes.

    **Sustainability**

                The factors influencing sustainability include stakeholder buy-in for the project, incorporation into routine interventions within the project site, and monitoring the implementation of the intervention to promote long-term implementation (Urquhart et al., 2021). Stakeholders buy-in and leadership support for the intervention will promote facility-wide support for the intervention, leading to the adoption of the intervention and long-term implementation. Incorporation of the practice change into routine practice intervention will advance the facility culture for evidence-based interventions, thereby promoting the long-term sustainability of the intervention. Monitoring the intervention implementation will assist in identifying backsliding, gaps, or inconsistencies in the practice change intervention, thereby informing interventions to promote sustained implementation of the intervention, such as through additional staff education interventions or educating new staff during the induction process to promote awareness of the practice change.

    **References**

    Bohnenkamp, J. H., Patel, C., Connors, E., Orenstein, S., Ereshefsky, S., Lever, N., & Hoover, S. (2023). Evaluating strategies to promote effective, multidisciplinary team collaboration in school mental health.
    _Journal of Applied School Psychology_,
    _39_(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2022.2077875

    Ericson Lidman, E., & Strandberg, G. (2023). Meanings of being a change agent in implementing a new organizational culture in home care services: A phenomenological hermeneutic study.
    _Nordic Journal of Nursing Research_. https://doi.org/10.1177/20571585231157505

    Urquhart, R., Kendell, C., Cornelissen, E., Powell, B. J., Madden, L. L., Kissmann, G., Richmond, S. A., & Bender, J. L. (2021). Identifying factors influencing sustainability of innovations in cancer survivorship care: A qualitative study.
    _BMJ Open_,
    _11_(2), Article e042503. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042503

    – Reply to post from Oluwakemi Aregbesola
    **Reply**

    – Mark as Unread
    **Mark as Unread**