Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] Journal Response MODULE 3-870

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As a global community, one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere **files (2)** – ## Module3JournalQuestion.docx – ## Module3Journal-RUBRIC.docx **## Module3JournalQuestion.docx** **Journal Question:** As a global community, one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere is Haiti…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As a global community, one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere

    **files (2)**

    – ## Module3JournalQuestion.docx

    – ## Module3Journal-RUBRIC.docx

    **## Module3JournalQuestion.docx**

    **Journal Question:**

    As a global community, one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere is Haiti. From a global policy perspective, select one of the issues below and describe the rationale for sensitive cultural strategies and potential policies, sustainable resources to improve outcomes, and how this policy development aligns with the mission and goals of the country and global health agencies.

    Haiti Health Issues (select one):

    · hunger & malnutrition

    · access to food and clean water

    · HIV/AIDS

    · human rights/political elections

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words;
    **no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module3Journal-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/13/26, 6:54 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    7/13/26, 6:54 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    Course:
    **DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet**

    **Expectations**

    **Approaches**

    **Expectations**

    **Meets Expectations**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    **Criterion Score**

    Claim/Quality of

    Information

    Weight: 40%

    / 8

    points

    0

    **pts**

    **(0**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is missing

    or inaccurate.

    Answer is inaccurate

    and does not ad

    –

    dress the prompt.

    points

    2.5

    **(5.6**

    **pts**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is missing

    key elements.

    Answer is partially

    inaccurate and

    misses elements in

    the prompt. Claims

    are lacking informa

    –

    tion to be fully

    thought out.

    points

    6.4

    **(6.4**

    **pts**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is appropri

    –

    ate and accurate.

    Answer is appropri

    –

    ate and responses

    to the prompt.

    Claims are

    appropriate.

    8

    points

    **pts**

    **(8**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is thorough

    and detailed.

    Answer is clear and

    concise and re

    –

    sponses to all as

    –

    pects of the prompt.

    Claims are justified

    and plausible.

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3-870)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403098/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403098/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    **## Module3Journal-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/13/26, 6:54 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    7/13/26, 6:54 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    Course:
    **DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet**

    **Expectations**

    **Approaches**

    **Expectations**

    **Meets Expectations**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    **Criterion Score**

    Claim/Quality of

    Information

    Weight: 40%

    / 8

    points

    0

    **pts**

    **(0**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is missing

    or inaccurate.

    Answer is inaccurate

    and does not ad

    –

    dress the prompt.

    points

    2.5

    **(5.6**

    **pts**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is missing

    key elements.

    Answer is partially

    inaccurate and

    misses elements in

    the prompt. Claims

    are lacking informa

    –

    tion to be fully

    thought out.

    points

    6.4

    **(6.4**

    **pts**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is appropri

    –

    ate and accurate.

    Answer is appropri

    –

    ate and responses

    to the prompt.

    Claims are

    appropriate.

    8

    points

    **pts**

    **(8**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is thorough

    and detailed.

    Answer is clear and

    concise and re

    –

    sponses to all as

    –

    pects of the prompt.

    Claims are justified

    and plausible.

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3-870)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403098/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403098/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    **## Module3JournalQuestion.docx**

    **Journal Question:**

    As a global community, one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere is Haiti. From a global policy perspective, select one of the issues below and describe the rationale for sensitive cultural strategies and potential policies, sustainable resources to improve outcomes, and how this policy development aligns with the mission and goals of the country and global health agencies.

    Haiti Health Issues (select one):

    · hunger & malnutrition

    · access to food and clean water

    · HIV/AIDS

    · human rights/political elections

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words;
    **no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module3Journal-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/13/26, 6:54 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    7/13/26, 6:54 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    Course:
    **DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet**

    **Expectations**

    **Approaches**

    **Expectations**

    **Meets Expectations**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    **Criterion Score**

    Claim/Quality of

    Information

    Weight: 40%

    / 8

    points

    0

    **pts**

    **(0**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is missing

    or inaccurate.

    Answer is inaccurate

    and does not ad

    –

    dress the prompt.

    points

    2.5

    **(5.6**

    **pts**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is missing

    key elements.

    Answer is partially

    inaccurate and

    misses elements in

    the prompt. Claims

    are lacking informa

    –

    tion to be fully

    thought out.

    points

    6.4

    **(6.4**

    **pts**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is appropri

    –

    ate and accurate.

    Answer is appropri

    –

    ate and responses

    to the prompt.

    Claims are

    appropriate.

    8

    points

    **pts**

    **(8**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is thorough

    and detailed.

    Answer is clear and

    concise and re

    –

    sponses to all as

    –

    pects of the prompt.

    Claims are justified

    and plausible.

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3-870)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403098/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403098/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

    **## Module3JournalQuestion.docx**

    **Journal Question:**

    As a global community, one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere is Haiti. From a global policy perspective, select one of the issues below and describe the rationale for sensitive cultural strategies and potential policies, sustainable resources to improve outcomes, and how this policy development aligns with the mission and goals of the country and global health agencies.

    Haiti Health Issues (select one):

    · hunger & malnutrition

    · access to food and clean water

    · HIV/AIDS

    · human rights/political elections

    **Journal Response Expectations**

    Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words;
    **no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module3Journal-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/13/26, 6:54 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    7/13/26, 6:54 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    Course:
    **DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet**

    **Expectations**

    **Approaches**

    **Expectations**

    **Meets Expectations**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    **Criterion Score**

    Claim/Quality of

    Information

    Weight: 40%

    / 8

    points

    0

    **pts**

    **(0**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is missing

    or inaccurate.

    Answer is inaccurate

    and does not ad

    –

    dress the prompt.

    points

    2.5

    **(5.6**

    **pts**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is missing

    key elements.

    Answer is partially

    inaccurate and

    misses elements in

    the prompt. Claims

    are lacking informa

    –

    tion to be fully

    thought out.

    points

    6.4

    **(6.4**

    **pts**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is appropri

    –

    ate and accurate.

    Answer is appropri

    –

    ate and responses

    to the prompt.

    Claims are

    appropriate.

    8

    points

    **pts**

    **(8**

    **)**

    Response to quiz

    question is thorough

    and detailed.

    Answer is clear and

    concise and re

    –

    sponses to all as

    –

    pects of the prompt.

    Claims are justified

    and plausible.

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3-870)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403098/View 1/3

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403098/View 1/3

    1/3

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Quin accesssment 1 cap

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    quin assessment 1 cap **files (1)** – ## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx **## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx** In a 5-7 page written assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communicati…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    quin assessment 1 cap

    **files (1)**

    – ## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx

    **## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx**

    In a 5-7 page written assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. Plan to spend approximately two direct practicum hours meeting with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    This assessment lays the foundation for the work that will carry you through your capstone experience and guide the practicum hours needed to complete the work in this course. In addition, it will enable you to do the following:

    · Develop a problem statement for a patient, family, or population that's relevant to your practice.

    · Begin building a body of evidence that will inform your approach to your practicum.

    · Focus on the influence of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the problem.

    **Preparation**

    In this assessment, you’ll assess the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Plan to spend approximately two hours working with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts about the problem (for example, directors of quality or patient safety, nurse managers/directors, physicians, and epidemiologists).

    To prepare for the assessment, complete the following:

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you want to work with during your practicum. The patient you select can be a friend or a family member. You’ll work with this patient, family, or group throughout your capstone project, focusing on a specific health care problem.

    · Begin surveying the scholarly and professional literature to establish your evidence and research base, inform your assessment, and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.

    In addition, you may wish to complete the following:

    · Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you’ll be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.

    · Review the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 1 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download), which provides guidance for conducting this portion of your practicum.

    **Note**: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s
    [Writing Support](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4646) page.

    **Instructions**

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    **Part 1**

    Use
    [Assessment 01 Supplement: Assessing the Problem: Leadership, Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and Policy Considerations [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483174/download?download_frd=1) to define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective and establish your evidence and research base to plan, implement, and share findings related to your project.

    **Part 2**

    Connect with the patient, family, or group you’ll work with during your practicum. During this portion of your practicum, plan to spend at least two hours meeting with the patient, family, or group and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. The hours you spend meeting with them should take place outside of regular work hours. Use the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207?wrap=1) [Download Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download?download_frd=1) provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061) Volunteer Experience Form.

    **Requirements**

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to your practice.

    · Summarize the problem you’ll explore.

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you intend to work with during your practicum.

    · Provide context, data, or information that substantiates the presence of the problem and its significance and relevance to the patient, family, or population.

    · Explain why this problem is relevant to your practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Note whether the authors provide supporting evidence from the literature that’s consistent with what you see in your nursing practice.

    · Explain how you would know if the data are unreliable.

    · Describe what the literature says about barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in addressing the problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of nursing standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe what the literature says about a nursing theory or conceptual framework that might frame and guide your actions during your practicum.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context of this problem.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Discuss research on the effectiveness of leadership strategies.

    · Define the role that you anticipate leadership must play in addressing the problem.

    · Describe collaboration and communication strategies that you anticipate will be needed to address the problem.

    · Describe the change management strategies that you anticipate will be required to address the problem.

    · Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Format**: Format your paper using APA style.
    [APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4243) is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:

    · A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.

    · Appropriate section headings.

    ·
    **Length**: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.

    ·
    **Supporting evidence**: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ·
    **Proofreading**: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

    **BSN Learner Time Reporting**

    Complete the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Include a description of your relationship to the patient, family, or group in the Volunteer Experience comments field.

    The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Please review the
    [BSN Practicum: Program Start Before January 2025](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=15018) Campus page for more information.

    **Context**

    Nurses in all professional roles work to effect positive patient outcomes and improve organizational processes. Professional nurses are leaders in problem identification, planning, and strategy implementation—skills that directly affect patient care or organizational effectiveness.

    Too often, change agents jump to a conclusion that an intervention will promote the envisioned improvement. Instead, the ideal approach is to determine which interventions are appropriate, based on an assessment and review of credible evidence. Interventions could be patient-facing or involve a change in policy and process. In this assessment, you’ll identify and make the case for your practicum focus area, then explore it in depth from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to personal and professional practice.

    · Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to a defined patient, family, or population problem and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Resources

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Expand All

    **Leadership**

    The following article provides an in-depth review of the effect of transformational leadership in nursing:

    **## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx**

    In a 5-7 page written assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. Plan to spend approximately two direct practicum hours meeting with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    This assessment lays the foundation for the work that will carry you through your capstone experience and guide the practicum hours needed to complete the work in this course. In addition, it will enable you to do the following:

    · Develop a problem statement for a patient, family, or population that's relevant to your practice.

    · Begin building a body of evidence that will inform your approach to your practicum.

    · Focus on the influence of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the problem.

    **Preparation**

    In this assessment, you’ll assess the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Plan to spend approximately two hours working with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts about the problem (for example, directors of quality or patient safety, nurse managers/directors, physicians, and epidemiologists).

    To prepare for the assessment, complete the following:

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you want to work with during your practicum. The patient you select can be a friend or a family member. You’ll work with this patient, family, or group throughout your capstone project, focusing on a specific health care problem.

    · Begin surveying the scholarly and professional literature to establish your evidence and research base, inform your assessment, and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.

    In addition, you may wish to complete the following:

    · Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you’ll be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.

    · Review the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 1 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download), which provides guidance for conducting this portion of your practicum.

    **Note**: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s
    [Writing Support](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4646) page.

    **Instructions**

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    **Part 1**

    Use
    [Assessment 01 Supplement: Assessing the Problem: Leadership, Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and Policy Considerations [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483174/download?download_frd=1) to define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective and establish your evidence and research base to plan, implement, and share findings related to your project.

    **Part 2**

    Connect with the patient, family, or group you’ll work with during your practicum. During this portion of your practicum, plan to spend at least two hours meeting with the patient, family, or group and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. The hours you spend meeting with them should take place outside of regular work hours. Use the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207?wrap=1) [Download Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download?download_frd=1) provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061) Volunteer Experience Form.

    **Requirements**

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to your practice.

    · Summarize the problem you’ll explore.

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you intend to work with during your practicum.

    · Provide context, data, or information that substantiates the presence of the problem and its significance and relevance to the patient, family, or population.

    · Explain why this problem is relevant to your practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Note whether the authors provide supporting evidence from the literature that’s consistent with what you see in your nursing practice.

    · Explain how you would know if the data are unreliable.

    · Describe what the literature says about barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in addressing the problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of nursing standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe what the literature says about a nursing theory or conceptual framework that might frame and guide your actions during your practicum.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context of this problem.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Discuss research on the effectiveness of leadership strategies.

    · Define the role that you anticipate leadership must play in addressing the problem.

    · Describe collaboration and communication strategies that you anticipate will be needed to address the problem.

    · Describe the change management strategies that you anticipate will be required to address the problem.

    · Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Format**: Format your paper using APA style.
    [APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4243) is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:

    · A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.

    · Appropriate section headings.

    ·
    **Length**: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.

    ·
    **Supporting evidence**: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ·
    **Proofreading**: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

    **BSN Learner Time Reporting**

    Complete the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Include a description of your relationship to the patient, family, or group in the Volunteer Experience comments field.

    The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Please review the
    [BSN Practicum: Program Start Before January 2025](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=15018) Campus page for more information.

    **Context**

    Nurses in all professional roles work to effect positive patient outcomes and improve organizational processes. Professional nurses are leaders in problem identification, planning, and strategy implementation—skills that directly affect patient care or organizational effectiveness.

    Too often, change agents jump to a conclusion that an intervention will promote the envisioned improvement. Instead, the ideal approach is to determine which interventions are appropriate, based on an assessment and review of credible evidence. Interventions could be patient-facing or involve a change in policy and process. In this assessment, you’ll identify and make the case for your practicum focus area, then explore it in depth from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to personal and professional practice.

    · Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to a defined patient, family, or population problem and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Resources

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Expand All

    **Leadership**

    The following article provides an in-depth review of the effect of transformational leadership in nursing:

  • [Solved] Project proposal work plan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Make sure you set realistic dates. – Make sure the people who you are listing in charge know they will be helping you with your project. Do not just assume they will help you. – List your activities. It can be making a pamphlet, taking a picture, creating the first chapter in a workbook, having it…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Make sure you set realistic dates.
    – Make sure the people who you are listing in charge know they will be helping you with your project. Do not just assume they will help you.
    – List your activities. It can be making a pamphlet, taking a picture, creating the first chapter in a workbook, having items printed, or going to the store and buying binders.
    – Try to estimate cost and make sure to stay within your budget. If services or items are donated, please write that. There does not have to be cost associated with your project.
    – Make sure you write how much time you estimate the activity will take.
    – In the phases section, make sure you add the implementation of your project.
    – Remember this is a proposal and you must complete your project in the last semester of the RN-BSN program. This template is to help you plan your time, so you do not wait until the last minute to complete everything. If you wait until the last minute there will be no way to complete your project on time, which will cause you to fail the course.

    – [\
    \
    CapstoneProjectProposalWorkPlanUpdated.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/capstoneprojectproposalworkplanupdated-docx-10579231 "CapstoneProjectProposalWorkPlanUpdated.docx")
    – [\
    \
    CapstoneProjectProposalWorkPlanUpdated-example.docx.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/capstoneprojectproposalworkplanupdated-example-docx-pdf "CapstoneProjectProposalWorkPlanUpdated-example.docx.pdf")

  • [Solved] Project outcome and evaluation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please complete blank template not the example template provided.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please complete blank template not the example template provided.

  • [Solved] Nursing week 3_Assignment_DNP870

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    unit requirement **files (2)** – ## Module3Assignment.docx – ## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx **## Module3Assignment.docx** **Assignment Description:** Prepare a 3000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions, focusing on Chapter 3 of the DNP Project Proposal: · Mention the agenci…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    unit requirement

    **files (2)**

    – ## Module3Assignment.docx

    – ## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

    **## Module3Assignment.docx**

    **Assignment Description:**

    Prepare a 3000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions, focusing on Chapter 3 of the DNP Project Proposal:

    · Mention the agencies, departments, committees, units, and individuals required/involved to complete the project.

    · Describe evidence-based strategies to promote buy-in and sustainability of the proposed practice change.

    · Define any potential barriers and your plan to mitigate barriers.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** 3000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment. Follow the DNP Project Proposal Template headings.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    ·
    **Review the rubric** and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
    **Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    Required Resources

    Porche, D. J. (2023).
    _Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapters 7 AND 8.

    **This is my Project Topic**

    "This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes."

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Assignment Term** | **My Project** |
    | **Agency** | Christ Life Bible Church |
    | **Department/Ministry** | Health Ministry |
    | **Committee** | Health Ministry Committee, Church Leadership |
    | **Unit** | The church's health ministry |
    | **Individuals** | Me (DNP student), preceptor, pastor, health ministry leader, volunteer nurses, church administrator, and adults with Type 2 diabetes participating in the project |

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/13/26, 9:23 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    7/13/26, 9:23 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403105/View 1/5

    1/5

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/13/26, 9:23 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    7/13/26, 9:23 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403105/View 1/5

    1/5

    **## Module3Assignment.docx**

    **Assignment Description:**

    Prepare a 3000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions, focusing on Chapter 3 of the DNP Project Proposal:

    · Mention the agencies, departments, committees, units, and individuals required/involved to complete the project.

    · Describe evidence-based strategies to promote buy-in and sustainability of the proposed practice change.

    · Define any potential barriers and your plan to mitigate barriers.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** 3000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment. Follow the DNP Project Proposal Template headings.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    ·
    **Review the rubric** and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
    **Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    Required Resources

    Porche, D. J. (2023).
    _Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapters 7 AND 8.

    **This is my Project Topic**

    "This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes."

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Assignment Term** | **My Project** |
    | **Agency** | Christ Life Bible Church |
    | **Department/Ministry** | Health Ministry |
    | **Committee** | Health Ministry Committee, Church Leadership |
    | **Unit** | The church's health ministry |
    | **Individuals** | Me (DNP student), preceptor, pastor, health ministry leader, volunteer nurses, church administrator, and adults with Type 2 diabetes participating in the project |

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/13/26, 9:23 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    7/13/26, 9:23 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403105/View 1/5

    1/5

    **## Module3Assignment.docx**

    **Assignment Description:**

    Prepare a 3000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions, focusing on Chapter 3 of the DNP Project Proposal:

    · Mention the agencies, departments, committees, units, and individuals required/involved to complete the project.

    · Describe evidence-based strategies to promote buy-in and sustainability of the proposed practice change.

    · Define any potential barriers and your plan to mitigate barriers.

    **The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

    ·
    **Length:** 3000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

    ·
    **Structure**: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment. Follow the DNP Project Proposal Template headings.

    ·
    **References**: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    ·
    **Review the rubric** and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

    **References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
    **Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    Required Resources

    Porche, D. J. (2023).
    _Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapters 7 AND 8.

    **This is my Project Topic**

    "This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes."

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Assignment Term** | **My Project** |
    | **Agency** | Christ Life Bible Church |
    | **Department/Ministry** | Health Ministry |
    | **Committee** | Health Ministry Committee, Church Leadership |
    | **Unit** | The church's health ministry |
    | **Individuals** | Me (DNP student), preceptor, pastor, health ministry leader, volunteer nurses, church administrator, and adults with Type 2 diabetes participating in the project |

    **## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

    7/13/26, 9:23 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    7/13/26, 9:23 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

    Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Introduction/Th

    esis Weight:

    %

    10

    / 10

    0

    points

    Weak or no intro

    –

    duction of topic.

    Purpose is

    unclear/thesis is

    weak or missing.

    7

    points

    Basic introduction

    that states topic but

    lacks interest. Thesis

    is somewhat clear

    and arguable.

    8

    points

    Proficient introduc

    –

    tion that is interest

    –

    ing and states topic.

    Thesis is clear and

    arguable statement

    of position.

    points

    10

    Exceptional intro

    –

    duction that grabs

    interest of reader

    and states topic;

    Thesis is exception

    –

    ally clear, arguable,

    well-developed, and

    a definitive

    statement.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
    | Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
    | Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |

    Total

    / 100

    APA Format

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    APA format and

    style are not

    evident.

    7

    points

    Missing APA ele

    –

    ments; in-text cita

    –

    tions, where neces

    –

    sary, are used but

    formatted inaccu

    –

    rately and not

    referenced.

    8

    points

    All key elements of

    an APA title page

    are present; In-text

    citations and a ref

    –

    erence page are

    present with few

    format errors.

    Mechanics of writ

    –

    ing are reflective of

    APA style.

    points

    10

    A broad understand

    –

    ing of APA format

    and style is evident.

    Accurate citations

    and references are

    presented. No APA

    errors are evident.

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403105/View 1/5

    1/5

  • [Solved] Nursing assignment 6 nur 603

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## poster-PPscriptassignment6instructionsnur603.docx **## poster-PPscriptassignment6instructionsnur603.docx** ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-6-nur-603)**_Professional Poster Presentation_** **Purpose:** In this assignment, you will disseminate your ev…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## poster-PPscriptassignment6instructionsnur603.docx

    **## poster-PPscriptassignment6instructionsnur603.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-6-nur-603)**_Professional Poster Presentation_**

    **Purpose:**

    In this assignment, you will disseminate your evidence-based project through an oral presentation.

    **Instructions:**

    · Create a professional poster presentation that describes the Capstone Project. Posters may include text and images as needed to convey concepts.

    **Assignment Tasks:**

    · The poster must include the following components:

    · Title of poster/project

    · Author name and credentials.

    · Background (i.e., Problem, effect on population, effect on practice).

    · Literature supporting your project (Brief synopsis).

    · PICO question.

    · EBP intervention

    · Implications/Recommendations

    · References (APA-formatted)

    **Submission Requirements:**

    · The poster must be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

    ·

    ·
    **Size and Layout**

    · Edit the dimensions of your poster in PowerPoint

    · It is recommended to keep your poster to 3 or 4 columns of content.

    ·
    **Visual Appeal**

    · You do not need to be a professional artist to create a stunning poster!

    · Please keep it simple, remember that brevity is key, and do not be overly wordy.

    · Remember that your poster is a visual representation and a synthesis of the "greatest hits" of your EBP Proposal!

    · Use high-resolution images and attribute them correctly.

    · Download poster template here:

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Live Presentation Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Live Presentation Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Presentation elements** | **Excellent**<br>All elements are present and demonstrate a sophisticated organization.<br>**40 to >37.2 pts**<br>**Acceptable**<br>Majority of elements are present and demonstrate an acceptable organization.<br>**37.2 to >33.2 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Missing criterion or no submission<br>**33.2 to >0 pts** | /40 pts |
    | **Presentation aesthetics** | **Excellent**<br>Both the presenter and the slides are appealing, cohesive and professional throughout.<br>**40 to >37.2 pts**<br>**Acceptable**<br>Both the presenter and the slides are either unappealing, in-cohesive, or unprofessional at some level, although generally the work is completed.<br>**37.2 to >33.2 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Missing criterion or no submission<br>**33.2 to >0 pts** | /40 pts |
    | **Writing mechanics and APA styles formatting** | **Excellent**<br>No spelling, grammar, typographical, or style errors.<br>**20 to >18.6 pts**<br>**Acceptable**<br>One or two spelling, grammar, typographical, or style errors.<br>**18.6 to >16.6 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Missing criterion or no submission<br>**16.6 to >0 pts** | /20 pts |

    ## image1.png

    **## poster-PPscriptassignment6instructionsnur603.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-6-nur-603)**_Professional Poster Presentation_**

    **Purpose:**

    In this assignment, you will disseminate your evidence-based project through an oral presentation.

    **Instructions:**

    · Create a professional poster presentation that describes the Capstone Project. Posters may include text and images as needed to convey concepts.

    **Assignment Tasks:**

    · The poster must include the following components:

    · Title of poster/project

    · Author name and credentials.

    · Background (i.e., Problem, effect on population, effect on practice).

    · Literature supporting your project (Brief synopsis).

    · PICO question.

    · EBP intervention

    · Implications/Recommendations

    · References (APA-formatted)

    **Submission Requirements:**

    · The poster must be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

    ·

    ·
    **Size and Layout**

    · Edit the dimensions of your poster in PowerPoint

    · It is recommended to keep your poster to 3 or 4 columns of content.

    ·
    **Visual Appeal**

    · You do not need to be a professional artist to create a stunning poster!

    · Please keep it simple, remember that brevity is key, and do not be overly wordy.

    · Remember that your poster is a visual representation and a synthesis of the "greatest hits" of your EBP Proposal!

    · Use high-resolution images and attribute them correctly.

    · Download poster template here:

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Live Presentation Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Live Presentation Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Presentation elements** | **Excellent**<br>All elements are present and demonstrate a sophisticated organization.<br>**40 to >37.2 pts**<br>**Acceptable**<br>Majority of elements are present and demonstrate an acceptable organization.<br>**37.2 to >33.2 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Missing criterion or no submission<br>**33.2 to >0 pts** | /40 pts |
    | **Presentation aesthetics** | **Excellent**<br>Both the presenter and the slides are appealing, cohesive and professional throughout.<br>**40 to >37.2 pts**<br>**Acceptable**<br>Both the presenter and the slides are either unappealing, in-cohesive, or unprofessional at some level, although generally the work is completed.<br>**37.2 to >33.2 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Missing criterion or no submission<br>**33.2 to >0 pts** | /40 pts |
    | **Writing mechanics and APA styles formatting** | **Excellent**<br>No spelling, grammar, typographical, or style errors.<br>**20 to >18.6 pts**<br>**Acceptable**<br>One or two spelling, grammar, typographical, or style errors.<br>**18.6 to >16.6 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Missing criterion or no submission<br>**16.6 to >0 pts** | /20 pts |

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Nursing assignment 6 nur 602

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## assignment6instructions.docx **## assignment6instructions.docx** ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-6-nur-602)**_Thriving Work Environments & Interprofessional Collaboration for Patient Safety_** **Purpose:** To describe strategies for a motivating wor…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## assignment6instructions.docx

    **## assignment6instructions.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-6-nur-602)**_Thriving Work Environments & Interprofessional Collaboration for Patient Safety_**

    **Purpose:**

    To describe strategies for a motivating work environment and explore rewards and positive reinforcement as a manager in an organization. This assessment will develop your understanding of the importance of interprofessional collaboration in creating quality outcomes in healthcare delivery.

    **Instructions:**

    Create a presentation that explores how you would establish a motivating work environment in a healthcare setting that fosters innovation, creativity, and employee empowerment. In your presentation, address the following:

    ·
    **Motivating Environment:** Outline strategies to create a work environment that encourages innovation and creativity among healthcare professionals.

    ·
    **Incentives and Rewards:** Discuss various incentive and reward systems, with a particular focus on individualized approaches, as highlighted in your readings. Explain how these rewards can motivate employees and contribute to a culture of continuous improvement.

    ·
    **Interprofessional Collaboration:** Describe how promoting collaboration among healthcare teams can improve patient outcomes and support quality control. Emphasize the importance of teamwork in fostering a culture of patient safety.

    ·
    **Application to Patient Safety:** Demonstrate how these strategies will contribute to creating a safer and more effective healthcare environment.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The power point presentation is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The presentation should be formatted per current APA and 8-10 slides in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_ or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    ·
    **Your assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.**

    ·
    **All paragraphs must have at least 5 sentences.**

    ·
    **All references must have “doi” if applicable**

    ·
    **All references must be cited**

    ·
    **Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%**

    ·
    **No AI detectable, no plagiarism.**

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Presentation Rubric (1)**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Presentation Rubric (1) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Distinguished**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |

    ·
    **Your assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.**

    ·
    **All paragraphs must have at least 5 sentences.**

    ·
    **All references must have “doi” if applicable**

    ·
    **All references must be cited**

    ·
    **Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%**

    ·
    **No AI detectable, no plagiarism.**

    ## image1.png

    **## assignment6instructions.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-6-nur-602)**_Thriving Work Environments & Interprofessional Collaboration for Patient Safety_**

    **Purpose:**

    To describe strategies for a motivating work environment and explore rewards and positive reinforcement as a manager in an organization. This assessment will develop your understanding of the importance of interprofessional collaboration in creating quality outcomes in healthcare delivery.

    **Instructions:**

    Create a presentation that explores how you would establish a motivating work environment in a healthcare setting that fosters innovation, creativity, and employee empowerment. In your presentation, address the following:

    ·
    **Motivating Environment:** Outline strategies to create a work environment that encourages innovation and creativity among healthcare professionals.

    ·
    **Incentives and Rewards:** Discuss various incentive and reward systems, with a particular focus on individualized approaches, as highlighted in your readings. Explain how these rewards can motivate employees and contribute to a culture of continuous improvement.

    ·
    **Interprofessional Collaboration:** Describe how promoting collaboration among healthcare teams can improve patient outcomes and support quality control. Emphasize the importance of teamwork in fostering a culture of patient safety.

    ·
    **Application to Patient Safety:** Demonstrate how these strategies will contribute to creating a safer and more effective healthcare environment.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The power point presentation is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The presentation should be formatted per current APA and 8-10 slides in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_ or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    ·
    **Your assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.**

    ·
    **All paragraphs must have at least 5 sentences.**

    ·
    **All references must have “doi” if applicable**

    ·
    **All references must be cited**

    ·
    **Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%**

    ·
    **No AI detectable, no plagiarism.**

    **Grading Rubric**

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Presentation Rubric (1)**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Presentation Rubric (1) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Distinguished**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**10 to >7.5 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**7.5 to >5 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**5 to >2.5 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**2.5 to >0 pts** | /10 pts |

    ·
    **Your assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.**

    ·
    **All paragraphs must have at least 5 sentences.**

    ·
    **All references must have “doi” if applicable**

    ·
    **All references must be cited**

    ·
    **Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%**

    ·
    **No AI detectable, no plagiarism.**

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Assessment 4 chels

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Assessment 4 chels.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## week4-Discussionpost.docx **## week4-Discussionpost.docx** It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Subs…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## week4-Discussionpost.docx

    **## week4-Discussionpost.docx**

    It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling.

    **Instructions:**

    When presenting a quality improvement project, it is important to have appropriate data to support your argument. Organizations can use data from these projects to improve patient care, decrease infection rates, and increase reimbursement. Data sources can start with the organizations EHR and extend to the state and national level. Below in the resources section are some examples of the larger data sets.

    · What role do you have in data input relative to quality improvement?

    · What risks/ benefits do you see with big data?

    · Review literature and discuss how data collection impacts reimbursement.

    · How is data collection and distribution impacted by blockchain technology?

    ·
    [Quality Payment Program General Resources Links to an external site.](https://qpp.cms.gov/resources/resource-library)

    ·
    [Center for Disease Control and Prevention Links to an external site.](https://data.cdc.gov/)

    ·
    [Health Data Links to an external site.](https://healthdata.gov/)

    ·
    [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Links to an external site.](https://data.cms.gov/)

    Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

    **## week4-Discussionpost.docx**

    It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling.

    **Instructions:**

    When presenting a quality improvement project, it is important to have appropriate data to support your argument. Organizations can use data from these projects to improve patient care, decrease infection rates, and increase reimbursement. Data sources can start with the organizations EHR and extend to the state and national level. Below in the resources section are some examples of the larger data sets.

    · What role do you have in data input relative to quality improvement?

    · What risks/ benefits do you see with big data?

    · Review literature and discuss how data collection impacts reimbursement.

    · How is data collection and distribution impacted by blockchain technology?

    ·
    [Quality Payment Program General Resources Links to an external site.](https://qpp.cms.gov/resources/resource-library)

    ·
    [Center for Disease Control and Prevention Links to an external site.](https://data.cdc.gov/)

    ·
    [Health Data Links to an external site.](https://healthdata.gov/)

    ·
    [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Links to an external site.](https://data.cms.gov/)

    Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

  • [Solved] Home work

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## DLV-3.docx **## DLV-3.docx** 9 **Competency** Analyze the influence of cultural, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors on public health. **Student Success Criteria** View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is lo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## DLV-3.docx

    **## DLV-3.docx**

    9

    **Competency**

    Analyze the influence of cultural, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors on public health.

    **Student Success Criteria**

    View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the

    “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.

    **Scenario**

    As a public health nurse at a community clinic, your supervisor has asked you to research and examine childhood obesity in the community. You have been asked to create a visual concept map to be shared during a staff meeting to illustrate your findings on the cultural, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors that are contributing to childhood obesity as well as determining how the community clinic can promote healthy behaviors to address childhood obesity.

    **Instructions**

    Create a visual concept map on child obesity and the factors influencing childhood obesity that:

    · Identifies a specific community to research and provides statistical data on childhood obesity in the selected community.

    · Analyzes the cultural, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors that influence childhood obesity.

    · Illustrates the connection between childhood obesity, behavior, culture, and socioeconomic status.

    · Describes how the promotion of health behaviors will help to reduce and ultimately eliminate childhood obesity.

    · Explains ways the public health nurse can support healthy behaviors while responding to the diverse needs in the community.

    · Provides stated ideas with professional language and attribution for credible sources with correct APA citation, spelling, and grammar in the visual concept map.

    **## DLV-3.docx**

    9

    **Competency**

    Analyze the influence of cultural, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors on public health.

    **Student Success Criteria**

    View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the

    “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.

    **Scenario**

    As a public health nurse at a community clinic, your supervisor has asked you to research and examine childhood obesity in the community. You have been asked to create a visual concept map to be shared during a staff meeting to illustrate your findings on the cultural, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors that are contributing to childhood obesity as well as determining how the community clinic can promote healthy behaviors to address childhood obesity.

    **Instructions**

    Create a visual concept map on child obesity and the factors influencing childhood obesity that:

    · Identifies a specific community to research and provides statistical data on childhood obesity in the selected community.

    · Analyzes the cultural, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors that influence childhood obesity.

    · Illustrates the connection between childhood obesity, behavior, culture, and socioeconomic status.

    · Describes how the promotion of health behaviors will help to reduce and ultimately eliminate childhood obesity.

    · Explains ways the public health nurse can support healthy behaviors while responding to the diverse needs in the community.

    · Provides stated ideas with professional language and attribution for credible sources with correct APA citation, spelling, and grammar in the visual concept map.