Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    find attached, read carefully, understand what is expected **files (6)** – ## -QUALITYIMPROVEMENTPROJECT.docx – EBSCO-FullText-06_02_2026.pdf – SimonsA_2024_Executive_Summary_QualityImprovement_Inititaitve_Evaluation.pdf – EBSCO-FullText-07_30_2026.pdf – Development_and_Evaluation_of_….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    find attached, read carefully, understand what is expected

    **files (6)**

    – ## -QUALITYIMPROVEMENTPROJECT.docx

    – EBSCO-FullText-06_02_2026.pdf
    – SimonsA_2024_Executive_Summary_QualityImprovement_Inititaitve_Evaluation.pdf
    – EBSCO-FullText-07_30_2026.pdf
    – Development_and_Evaluation_of_.pdf
    – OncologyNursesCompassionFatigueandGeneralHealth_AMixed-M.pdf

    **## -QUALITYIMPROVEMENTPROJECT.docx**

    QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

    As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the field of practice? How might the use of various methods lend itself to capturing substantive results for improvement?

    In this Assignment, you will explore both quantitative and qualitative methods in a critique of a published DNP project. You will consider how the findings connect to a practice-focused question.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/230274/modules/items/9808988)

    **To prepare:**

    · Select a DNP project that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to summarize the results from the options provided.

    · Review the required Learning Resources regarding how to summarize results.

    · Consider how the findings reflect the practice-focused question in the selected project.

    **The Assignment**

    Critique a DNP project that used both quantitative and qualitative methods and summarize the results.

    Link the results of both quantitative and qualitative findings to the practice-focused question in the DNP project.

    Your Assignment should total no more than 5-7 pages, plus your title page and reference page.

    BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10

    **Submit** your Assignment by
    **Day 7 of Week 10**.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK10Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritiqued the results of the quantitative methods used in the selected DNP project. | **68 to >58.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response comprehensively and clearly includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**58 to >48.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response clearly includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**48 to >38.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response inaccurately or vaguely includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the patient care delivery gap or problem, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague metrics and data, or it is missing. | 68 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarized results of the qualitative methods used in a selected DNP project. | **68 to >58.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.<br> <br>**58 to >48.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the identification.<br> <br>**48 to >38.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the identification.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identification, or it is missing. | 68 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentified the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused questions in the DNP project. | **34 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly identifies the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**29 to >27.0 ptsGood** The response includes examples that support the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**27 to >26.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**26 to >0 ptsPoor** The response does not describe the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project. | 34 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 200

    **EBSCO-FullText-06_02_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-06-02-2026-pdf)

    **SimonsA_2024_Executive_Summary_QualityImprovement_Inititaitve_Evaluation.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/simonsa-2024-executive-summary-qualityimprovement-inititaitve-evaluation-pdf-10581569)

    **EBSCO-FullText-07_30_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-07-30-2026-pdf)

    **Development_and_Evaluation_of_.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/development-and-evaluation-of-pdf)

    **OncologyNursesCompassionFatigueandGeneralHealth_AMixed-M.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/oncologynursescompassionfatigueandgeneralhealth-amixed-m-pdf-10581565)

    **OncologyNursesCompassionFatigueandGeneralHealth_AMixed-M.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/oncologynursescompassionfatigueandgeneralhealth-amixed-m-pdf-10581565)

    **## -QUALITYIMPROVEMENTPROJECT.docx**

    QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

    As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the field of practice? How might the use of various methods lend itself to capturing substantive results for improvement?

    In this Assignment, you will explore both quantitative and qualitative methods in a critique of a published DNP project. You will consider how the findings connect to a practice-focused question.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/230274/modules/items/9808988)

    **To prepare:**

    · Select a DNP project that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to summarize the results from the options provided.

    · Review the required Learning Resources regarding how to summarize results.

    · Consider how the findings reflect the practice-focused question in the selected project.

    **The Assignment**

    Critique a DNP project that used both quantitative and qualitative methods and summarize the results.

    Link the results of both quantitative and qualitative findings to the practice-focused question in the DNP project.

    Your Assignment should total no more than 5-7 pages, plus your title page and reference page.

    BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10

    **Submit** your Assignment by
    **Day 7 of Week 10**.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK10Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritiqued the results of the quantitative methods used in the selected DNP project. | **68 to >58.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response comprehensively and clearly includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**58 to >48.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response clearly includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**48 to >38.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response inaccurately or vaguely includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the patient care delivery gap or problem, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague metrics and data, or it is missing. | 68 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarized results of the qualitative methods used in a selected DNP project. | **68 to >58.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.<br> <br>**58 to >48.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the identification.<br> <br>**48 to >38.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the identification.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identification, or it is missing. | 68 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentified the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused questions in the DNP project. | **34 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly identifies the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**29 to >27.0 ptsGood** The response includes examples that support the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**27 to >26.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**26 to >0 ptsPoor** The response does not describe the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project. | 34 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 200

    **EBSCO-FullText-06_02_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-06-02-2026-pdf)

    **SimonsA_2024_Executive_Summary_QualityImprovement_Inititaitve_Evaluation.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/simonsa-2024-executive-summary-qualityimprovement-inititaitve-evaluation-pdf-10581569)

    **EBSCO-FullText-07_30_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-07-30-2026-pdf)

    **Development_and_Evaluation_of_.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/development-and-evaluation-of-pdf)

    **OncologyNursesCompassionFatigueandGeneralHealth_AMixed-M.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/oncologynursescompassionfatigueandgeneralhealth-amixed-m-pdf-10581565)

    **## -QUALITYIMPROVEMENTPROJECT.docx**

    QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

    As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the field of practice? How might the use of various methods lend itself to capturing substantive results for improvement?

    In this Assignment, you will explore both quantitative and qualitative methods in a critique of a published DNP project. You will consider how the findings connect to a practice-focused question.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/230274/modules/items/9808988)

    **To prepare:**

    · Select a DNP project that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to summarize the results from the options provided.

    · Review the required Learning Resources regarding how to summarize results.

    · Consider how the findings reflect the practice-focused question in the selected project.

    **The Assignment**

    Critique a DNP project that used both quantitative and qualitative methods and summarize the results.

    Link the results of both quantitative and qualitative findings to the practice-focused question in the DNP project.

    Your Assignment should total no more than 5-7 pages, plus your title page and reference page.

    BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10

    **Submit** your Assignment by
    **Day 7 of Week 10**.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK10Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritiqued the results of the quantitative methods used in the selected DNP project. | **68 to >58.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response comprehensively and clearly includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**58 to >48.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response clearly includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**48 to >38.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response inaccurately or vaguely includes metrics and data for support.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the patient care delivery gap or problem, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague metrics and data, or it is missing. | 68 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarized results of the qualitative methods used in a selected DNP project. | **68 to >58.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.<br> <br>**58 to >48.0 ptsGood** The response clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the identification.<br> <br>**48 to >38.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the identification.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identification, or it is missing. | 68 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentified the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused questions in the DNP project. | **34 to >29.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly identifies the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**29 to >27.0 ptsGood** The response includes examples that support the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**27 to >26.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.<br> <br>**26 to >0 ptsPoor** The response does not describe the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project. | 34 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 200

    **EBSCO-FullText-06_02_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-06-02-2026-pdf)

    **SimonsA_2024_Executive_Summary_QualityImprovement_Inititaitve_Evaluation.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/simonsa-2024-executive-summary-qualityimprovement-inititaitve-evaluation-pdf-10581569)

    **EBSCO-FullText-07_30_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-07-30-2026-pdf)

    **Development_and_Evaluation_of_.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/development-and-evaluation-of-pdf)

    **OncologyNursesCompassionFatigueandGeneralHealth_AMixed-M.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/oncologynursescompassionfatigueandgeneralhealth-amixed-m-pdf-10581565)

  • [Solved] lorem

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## SOAP_073026.docx **## SOAP_073026.docx** Over the course of the semester you will choose 1 patient encounter each week to document a SOAP note for. In Weeks 2, 3, and 4, you will submit only the subjective and objective data sets for your chosen encounter. It is expected that yo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## SOAP_073026.docx

    **## SOAP_073026.docx**

    Over the course of the semester you will choose 1 patient encounter each week to document a SOAP note for. In Weeks 2, 3, and 4, you will submit only the subjective and objective data sets for your chosen encounter.

    It is expected that you vary the primary focus of each note to ensure you are receiving quality feedback for several types of patient encounters to include acute, chronic and wellness encounters.  You are not to utilize the same type of encounter, acute/chronic health condition or wellness exam, more than once unless you have received approval to do so from your clinical faculty person.

    SOAP notes will be evaluated using a standardized rubric.  Please review the evaluation criterion to ensure that your SOAP notes are constructed to address the required elements and desired level of achievement.

    For planned weekly clinical experiences submission of the SOAP notes would be accomplished by submitting one SOAP note weekly for weeks 2 through week 7.

    For planned and approved condensed, compressed or alternate clinical experiences, submission of the SOAP note would be dependent on the approved clinical schedule.  This may mean that more than 1 SOAP note would need to be submitted on a weekly basis.  If you are not in clinical for weeks where a SOAP note is due a ‘0’ will be input into the Grade Center as a place holder until you have submitted the required assignment.

    **## SOAP_073026.docx**

    Over the course of the semester you will choose 1 patient encounter each week to document a SOAP note for. In Weeks 2, 3, and 4, you will submit only the subjective and objective data sets for your chosen encounter.

    It is expected that you vary the primary focus of each note to ensure you are receiving quality feedback for several types of patient encounters to include acute, chronic and wellness encounters.  You are not to utilize the same type of encounter, acute/chronic health condition or wellness exam, more than once unless you have received approval to do so from your clinical faculty person.

    SOAP notes will be evaluated using a standardized rubric.  Please review the evaluation criterion to ensure that your SOAP notes are constructed to address the required elements and desired level of achievement.

    For planned weekly clinical experiences submission of the SOAP notes would be accomplished by submitting one SOAP note weekly for weeks 2 through week 7.

    For planned and approved condensed, compressed or alternate clinical experiences, submission of the SOAP note would be dependent on the approved clinical schedule.  This may mean that more than 1 SOAP note would need to be submitted on a weekly basis.  If you are not in clinical for weeks where a SOAP note is due a ‘0’ will be input into the Grade Center as a place holder until you have submitted the required assignment.

  • [Solved] Wkk10 pp

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Succinctly, in 1–2 pages, address the following:** – Briefly describe the personality disorder you selected, including the _DSM-5-TR_ diagnostic criteria. – Explain a therapeutic approach and a modality you might use to treat a client presenting with this disorder. Explain why you selected the app…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Succinctly, in 1–2 pages, address the following:**

    – Briefly describe the personality disorder you selected, including the _DSM-5-TR_ diagnostic criteria.
    – Explain a therapeutic approach and a modality you might use to treat a client presenting with this disorder. Explain why you selected the approach and modality, justifying their appropriateness.
    – Next, briefly explain what a therapeutic relationship is in psychiatry. Explain how you would share your diagnosis of this disorder with the client in order to avoid damaging the therapeutic relationship. Compare the differences in how you would share your diagnosis with an individual, a family, and in a group session.

    Support your response with specific examples from this week’s Learning Resources and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

  • [Solved] response-PUTTING IT TOGETHER

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    respond to the 2 people in the attached **files (1)** – ## response–.docx **## response–.docx** **SC** [**Samuelle A Jean Charles**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/230274/users/46770) Jul 29 8:15pm Reply from Samuelle A Jean Charles Frazier's (2023) study is a well-suited application of m…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    respond to the 2 people in the attached

    **files (1)**

    – ## response–.docx

    **## response–.docx**

    **SC**

    [**Samuelle A Jean Charles**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/230274/users/46770)

    Jul 29 8:15pm

    Reply from Samuelle A Jean Charles

                    Frazier's (2023) study is a well-suited application of mixed-methods design to a DNP-relevant practice problem: secondary traumatic stress (STS) among emergency room nurses. The project combined a quantitative survey strand measuring STS prevalence and a qualitative phenomenological strand exploring nurses' lived experiences of that stress. This design choice was appropriate because the underlying practice problem had both a measurable dimension (how many nurses are affected, and by what factors) and an experiential dimension (how STS affects nurses' work, relationships, and personal lives) that a single-method study could not have captured on its own. The project's findings, that coping style and education level predict STS more than structural job factors, and that STS bleeds into nurses' personal and relational lives, translate into actionable DNP practice implications, namely the need for early STS education, structured debriefing, and proactive stress-management support built into orientation and ongoing employment (Frazier, 2023). As a QI-oriented dissertation, the study's strength lies in generating both generalizable risk indicators and rich contextual understanding, which together provide a stronger evidence base for designing a targeted intervention than either strand alone (Flores et al.,2024).

           Frazier's (2023) practice-focused question centered on understanding both the prevalence of STS among emergency room nurses and the lived experience underlying that prevalence, which naturally called for a mixed-methods design rather than a single-method approach. The quantitative strand answered the "how much and what predicts it" portion of the question by establishing that a large proportion of ER nurses experience mild to severe STS and by identifying education level, avoidant coping, emotion-focused coping, and changes in perceived stress as significant correlates, while ruling out structural variables such as years of experience, trauma level, shift, and employment status. The qualitative strand then answered the "what does it feel like and how do nurses manage it" portion, using phenomenological interviews to surface five impact themes (patient care, workplace relationships, life outside the hospital, personal impact, and residual stress) and three coping themes (positive coping, dysfunctional coping, and debriefing). Because the practice question was explicitly two-part, magnitude/predictors and lived experience, the two strands were not redundant but complementary; the quantitative data identified who is at risk and which factors matter, while the qualitative data explained why those factors matter and how STS manifests in nurses' daily and personal lives (Frazier, 2023). This integration reflects what (Flores et al., 2024) describes as the core rationale for mixed-methods and triangulation designs in nursing research: using multiple data sources to answer different facets of a single clinical question so the combined findings are more complete than either method could produce alone.

               The effectiveness of each methodological component was evident in its contribution to actionable QI insights. The quantitative findings were effective in identifying patterns and risk factors, aligning with recent research indicating that maladaptive coping strongly predicts burnout and STS among nurses (Ratrout & Hamdan-Mansour, 2020). Meanwhile, the qualitative findings were particularly effective in contextualizing these patterns, illustrating how STS permeates nurses’ emotional lives and clinical performance. These narratives highlighted the need for structured debriefing, early STS education, and traumainformed organizational supports, recommendations consistent with contemporary workforce resilience literature (Beck et al., 2022). Overall, the mixedmethods approach enhanced the project’s practice relevance by producing both measurable evidence and rich experiential data that support targeted interventions to reduce STS in emergency nursing.

                                                                                                   References

    Beck C. T. (2011). Secondary traumatic stress in nurses: a systematic review.
    _Archives of psychiatric nursing_,
    _25_(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2010.05.005

    Flores. S.L. N., Dunbar, G. B., Aquino-Maneja, E. M.,  Squier, V. R., & Failla, K. R. (2024). Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified.
    _The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing_,
    _55_(7), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20240328-03

    Frazier, M. C. (2023).
    _Examining the lived experience of secondary traumatic stress in emergency room nurses: A mixed methods study_ (Publication No. 30816304) [Doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Ratrout, H. F., & Hamdan-Mansour, A. M. (2020). Secondary traumatic stress among emergency nurses: Prevalence, predictors, and consequences.
    _International journal of nursing practice_,
    _26_(1), e12767. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12767

    · Reply to post from Samuelle A Jean Charles
    **Reply**

    · Mark as Unread
    **Mark as Unread**

    [**Omar El Shater**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/230274/users/122932)

    Jul 29 4:31pm| Last reply Jul 29 8:06pm

    Reply from Omar El Shater

    Mixed Methods Research in a DNP Quality Improvement Project

    Mixed methods research combines quantitative and qualitative approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of complex healthcare problems. Quantitative methods determine whether an intervention is effective by measuring objective outcomes, while qualitative methods explore participants' experiences, perceptions, and contextual factors that influence implementation and sustainability. This combination is particularly valuable for Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) quality improvement (QI) projects because it allows nurse leaders to evaluate both clinical outcomes and the human factors that affect practice change. One DNP QI project that effectively utilized a mixed methods approach is Rampersad's (2023) study examining compassion fatigue and general health among oncology nurses.

    Rampersad (2023) examined the relationship between compassion fatigue and the general health of oncology nurses and explored nurses' personal experiences of workplace stress and coping strategies. The practice-focused question required both quantitative and qualitative evidence to understand the problem fully. Quantitative data were collected on compassion fatigue, burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and overall health using standardized instruments, allowing the researcher to determine the prevalence and severity of these issues. The qualitative interviews complemented these findings by providing detailed descriptions of nurses' emotional experiences, workplace challenges, organizational support, and coping mechanisms. Together, the quantitative findings identified the magnitude of compassion fatigue, while the qualitative findings explained why nurses experienced these outcomes and identified factors that could guide organizational interventions. This integration strengthened the evidence by connecting measurable outcomes to participants' lived experiences, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the practice problem (Rampersad, 2023; Tenny et al., 2022).

    Both components of the mixed methods design contributed unique strengths to the project. The quantitative component produced objective, measurable evidence that could be statistically analyzed and compared across participants, providing reliable data regarding compassion fatigue and general health. However, numerical findings alone could not explain the underlying causes of nurses' experiences or identify practical strategies for improvement. The qualitative component filled this gap by revealing themes related to emotional exhaustion, organizational culture, workload, peer support, and resilience. These insights generated practical recommendations for leadership interventions, staff support programs, and workplace wellness initiatives that would not have emerged through quantitative analysis alone. Mixed methods research, therefore, enhanced the project's relevance to evidence-based practice by combining statistical rigor with contextual understanding, enabling nurse leaders to design interventions that address both measurable outcomes and the experiences of healthcare professionals. Similar principles can be applied to patient safety initiatives, such as fall prevention, where quantitative studies evaluate intervention effectiveness, while qualitative studies identify barriers and facilitators to successful implementation (Khoja & Moosa, 2023; Tzeng & Yin, 2017).

    References

    Khoja, A., & Moosa, L. (2023).
    [Impact of tailored interventions for patient safety (TIPS) to reduce fall ratesLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=rzh&AN=163143819&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _MEDSURG Nursing, 32_(2), 89–93.

    Rampersad, M. (2023).
    [_Oncology nurses, compassion fatigue and general health: A mixed-methods studyLinks to an external site._](https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11819) [Links to an external site.Links to an external site.](https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11819). Walden University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11819/

    Tenny, S., Brannan, J. M., & Brannan, G. D. (2022). Qualitative study.
    _StatPearls_. Retrieved July 29, 2026, from
    [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/Links to an external site.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/)

    Tzeng, H.-M., & Yin, C.-Y. (2017).
    [A multihospital survey on effective interventions to prevent hospital falls in adultsLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=rzh&AN=126865180&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Nursing Economics, 35_(6), 304–313.

    **## response–.docx**

    **SC**

    [**Samuelle A Jean Charles**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/230274/users/46770)

    Jul 29 8:15pm

    Reply from Samuelle A Jean Charles

                    Frazier's (2023) study is a well-suited application of mixed-methods design to a DNP-relevant practice problem: secondary traumatic stress (STS) among emergency room nurses. The project combined a quantitative survey strand measuring STS prevalence and a qualitative phenomenological strand exploring nurses' lived experiences of that stress. This design choice was appropriate because the underlying practice problem had both a measurable dimension (how many nurses are affected, and by what factors) and an experiential dimension (how STS affects nurses' work, relationships, and personal lives) that a single-method study could not have captured on its own. The project's findings, that coping style and education level predict STS more than structural job factors, and that STS bleeds into nurses' personal and relational lives, translate into actionable DNP practice implications, namely the need for early STS education, structured debriefing, and proactive stress-management support built into orientation and ongoing employment (Frazier, 2023). As a QI-oriented dissertation, the study's strength lies in generating both generalizable risk indicators and rich contextual understanding, which together provide a stronger evidence base for designing a targeted intervention than either strand alone (Flores et al.,2024).

           Frazier's (2023) practice-focused question centered on understanding both the prevalence of STS among emergency room nurses and the lived experience underlying that prevalence, which naturally called for a mixed-methods design rather than a single-method approach. The quantitative strand answered the "how much and what predicts it" portion of the question by establishing that a large proportion of ER nurses experience mild to severe STS and by identifying education level, avoidant coping, emotion-focused coping, and changes in perceived stress as significant correlates, while ruling out structural variables such as years of experience, trauma level, shift, and employment status. The qualitative strand then answered the "what does it feel like and how do nurses manage it" portion, using phenomenological interviews to surface five impact themes (patient care, workplace relationships, life outside the hospital, personal impact, and residual stress) and three coping themes (positive coping, dysfunctional coping, and debriefing). Because the practice question was explicitly two-part, magnitude/predictors and lived experience, the two strands were not redundant but complementary; the quantitative data identified who is at risk and which factors matter, while the qualitative data explained why those factors matter and how STS manifests in nurses' daily and personal lives (Frazier, 2023). This integration reflects what (Flores et al., 2024) describes as the core rationale for mixed-methods and triangulation designs in nursing research: using multiple data sources to answer different facets of a single clinical question so the combined findings are more complete than either method could produce alone.

               The effectiveness of each methodological component was evident in its contribution to actionable QI insights. The quantitative findings were effective in identifying patterns and risk factors, aligning with recent research indicating that maladaptive coping strongly predicts burnout and STS among nurses (Ratrout & Hamdan-Mansour, 2020). Meanwhile, the qualitative findings were particularly effective in contextualizing these patterns, illustrating how STS permeates nurses’ emotional lives and clinical performance. These narratives highlighted the need for structured debriefing, early STS education, and traumainformed organizational supports, recommendations consistent with contemporary workforce resilience literature (Beck et al., 2022). Overall, the mixedmethods approach enhanced the project’s practice relevance by producing both measurable evidence and rich experiential data that support targeted interventions to reduce STS in emergency nursing.

                                                                                                   References

    Beck C. T. (2011). Secondary traumatic stress in nurses: a systematic review.
    _Archives of psychiatric nursing_,
    _25_(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2010.05.005

    Flores. S.L. N., Dunbar, G. B., Aquino-Maneja, E. M.,  Squier, V. R., & Failla, K. R. (2024). Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified.
    _The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing_,
    _55_(7), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20240328-03

    Frazier, M. C. (2023).
    _Examining the lived experience of secondary traumatic stress in emergency room nurses: A mixed methods study_ (Publication No. 30816304) [Doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Ratrout, H. F., & Hamdan-Mansour, A. M. (2020). Secondary traumatic stress among emergency nurses: Prevalence, predictors, and consequences.
    _International journal of nursing practice_,
    _26_(1), e12767. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12767

    · Reply to post from Samuelle A Jean Charles
    **Reply**

    · Mark as Unread
    **Mark as Unread**

    [**Omar El Shater**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/230274/users/122932)

    Jul 29 4:31pm| Last reply Jul 29 8:06pm

    Reply from Omar El Shater

    Mixed Methods Research in a DNP Quality Improvement Project

    Mixed methods research combines quantitative and qualitative approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of complex healthcare problems. Quantitative methods determine whether an intervention is effective by measuring objective outcomes, while qualitative methods explore participants' experiences, perceptions, and contextual factors that influence implementation and sustainability. This combination is particularly valuable for Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) quality improvement (QI) projects because it allows nurse leaders to evaluate both clinical outcomes and the human factors that affect practice change. One DNP QI project that effectively utilized a mixed methods approach is Rampersad's (2023) study examining compassion fatigue and general health among oncology nurses.

    Rampersad (2023) examined the relationship between compassion fatigue and the general health of oncology nurses and explored nurses' personal experiences of workplace stress and coping strategies. The practice-focused question required both quantitative and qualitative evidence to understand the problem fully. Quantitative data were collected on compassion fatigue, burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and overall health using standardized instruments, allowing the researcher to determine the prevalence and severity of these issues. The qualitative interviews complemented these findings by providing detailed descriptions of nurses' emotional experiences, workplace challenges, organizational support, and coping mechanisms. Together, the quantitative findings identified the magnitude of compassion fatigue, while the qualitative findings explained why nurses experienced these outcomes and identified factors that could guide organizational interventions. This integration strengthened the evidence by connecting measurable outcomes to participants' lived experiences, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the practice problem (Rampersad, 2023; Tenny et al., 2022).

    Both components of the mixed methods design contributed unique strengths to the project. The quantitative component produced objective, measurable evidence that could be statistically analyzed and compared across participants, providing reliable data regarding compassion fatigue and general health. However, numerical findings alone could not explain the underlying causes of nurses' experiences or identify practical strategies for improvement. The qualitative component filled this gap by revealing themes related to emotional exhaustion, organizational culture, workload, peer support, and resilience. These insights generated practical recommendations for leadership interventions, staff support programs, and workplace wellness initiatives that would not have emerged through quantitative analysis alone. Mixed methods research, therefore, enhanced the project's relevance to evidence-based practice by combining statistical rigor with contextual understanding, enabling nurse leaders to design interventions that address both measurable outcomes and the experiences of healthcare professionals. Similar principles can be applied to patient safety initiatives, such as fall prevention, where quantitative studies evaluate intervention effectiveness, while qualitative studies identify barriers and facilitators to successful implementation (Khoja & Moosa, 2023; Tzeng & Yin, 2017).

    References

    Khoja, A., & Moosa, L. (2023).
    [Impact of tailored interventions for patient safety (TIPS) to reduce fall ratesLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=rzh&AN=163143819&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _MEDSURG Nursing, 32_(2), 89–93.

    Rampersad, M. (2023).
    [_Oncology nurses, compassion fatigue and general health: A mixed-methods studyLinks to an external site._](https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11819) [Links to an external site.Links to an external site.](https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11819). Walden University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11819/

    Tenny, S., Brannan, J. M., & Brannan, G. D. (2022). Qualitative study.
    _StatPearls_. Retrieved July 29, 2026, from
    [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/Links to an external site.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/)

    Tzeng, H.-M., & Yin, C.-Y. (2017).
    [A multihospital survey on effective interventions to prevent hospital falls in adultsLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=rzh&AN=126865180&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Nursing Economics, 35_(6), 304–313.

  • [Solved] Quin new bid

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## nurs-fpx4900-assessment-01-supplement-assessing-the-problem-A.pdf – ## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx **## nurs-fpx4900-assessment-01-supplement-assessing-the-problem-A.pdf** 1 Assessment 01 – Assessing the Problem: Leadership, Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and Policy …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## nurs-fpx4900-assessment-01-supplement-assessing-the-problem-A.pdf

    – ## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx

    **## nurs-fpx4900-assessment-01-supplement-assessing-the-problem-A.pdf**

    1

    Assessment 01 – Assessing the Problem: Leadership,

    Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and
    Policy Considerations

    For this assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the
    focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration,
    communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first select one of the following
    to be the problem you focus on for your capstone project:

    • Patient Health Problems
    o Obesity: A medical condition characterized by an excessive amount of body fat.

    Obesity increases the risk of various diseases, including heart disease, diabetes,
    and certain cancers. The management of obesity involves dietary changes,
    physical activity, and sometimes medication or surgery.

    o Cancer: A group of diseases characterized by the uncontrolled growth and
    spread of abnormal cells. There are many types of cancer, including breast, lung,
    and colon cancer. Treatment varies based on the type and stage and may
    include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and other therapies.

    • Family Health Problems
    o Alcoholism: A chronic disease characterized by uncontrolled drinking and a

    preoccupation with alcohol. Alcoholism can have profound effects on family
    dynamics, leading to financial difficulties, neglect, and strained relationships.

    o Tobacco Addiction: A dependence on nicotine, primarily from smoking
    cigarettes or using smokeless tobacco products. Tobacco addiction poses
    significant health risks to the user and can expose family members to harmful
    secondhand smoke.

    • Population Health Problems

    o Diabetes: A chronic metabolic disorder where the body cannot regulate blood
    sugar levels, leading to a range of complications. At a population level, diabetes
    is associated with lifestyle factors, genetics, and access to healthcare.

    o Congestive Heart Failure: A condition where the heart doesn't pump blood as
    efficiently as it should, leading to symptoms like shortness of breath and fatigue.
    Congestive heart failure is a major public health concern due to its high
    prevalence and associated hospitalizations.

    These health problems are significant challenges for healthcare providers and public health
    experts. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach that includes preventive

    2

    measures, early detection, and effective treatment strategies. Education and awareness
    campaigns, community engagement, and policy changes are also essential to improving
    population health outcomes.

    After you have selected one of the problems from the list above, return to the detailed
    instructions in the courseroom to complete your assessment.

    **## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx**

    In a 5-7 page written assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. Plan to spend approximately two direct practicum hours meeting with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    This assessment lays the foundation for the work that will carry you through your capstone experience and guide the practicum hours needed to complete the work in this course. In addition, it will enable you to do the following:

    · Develop a problem statement for a patient, family, or population that's relevant to your practice.

    · Begin building a body of evidence that will inform your approach to your practicum.

    · Focus on the influence of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the problem.

    **Preparation**

    In this assessment, you’ll assess the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Plan to spend approximately two hours working with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts about the problem (for example, directors of quality or patient safety, nurse managers/directors, physicians, and epidemiologists).

    To prepare for the assessment, complete the following:

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you want to work with during your practicum. The patient you select can be a friend or a family member. You’ll work with this patient, family, or group throughout your capstone project, focusing on a specific health care problem.

    · Begin surveying the scholarly and professional literature to establish your evidence and research base, inform your assessment, and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.

    In addition, you may wish to complete the following:

    · Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you’ll be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.

    · Review the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 1 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download), which provides guidance for conducting this portion of your practicum.

    **Note**: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s
    [Writing Support](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4646) page.

    **Instructions**

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    **Part 1**

    Use
    [Assessment 01 Supplement: Assessing the Problem: Leadership, Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and Policy Considerations [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483174/download?download_frd=1) to define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective and establish your evidence and research base to plan, implement, and share findings related to your project.

    **Part 2**

    Connect with the patient, family, or group you’ll work with during your practicum. During this portion of your practicum, plan to spend at least two hours meeting with the patient, family, or group and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. The hours you spend meeting with them should take place outside of regular work hours. Use the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207?wrap=1) [Download Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download?download_frd=1) provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061) Volunteer Experience Form.

    **Requirements**

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to your practice.

    · Summarize the problem you’ll explore.

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you intend to work with during your practicum.

    · Provide context, data, or information that substantiates the presence of the problem and its significance and relevance to the patient, family, or population.

    · Explain why this problem is relevant to your practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Note whether the authors provide supporting evidence from the literature that’s consistent with what you see in your nursing practice.

    · Explain how you would know if the data are unreliable.

    · Describe what the literature says about barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in addressing the problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of nursing standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe what the literature says about a nursing theory or conceptual framework that might frame and guide your actions during your practicum.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context of this problem.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Discuss research on the effectiveness of leadership strategies.

    · Define the role that you anticipate leadership must play in addressing the problem.

    · Describe collaboration and communication strategies that you anticipate will be needed to address the problem.

    · Describe the change management strategies that you anticipate will be required to address the problem.

    · Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Format**: Format your paper using APA style.
    [APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4243) is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:

    · A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.

    · Appropriate section headings.

    ·
    **Length**: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.

    ·
    **Supporting evidence**: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ·
    **Proofreading**: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

    **BSN Learner Time Reporting**

    Complete the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Include a description of your relationship to the patient, family, or group in the Volunteer Experience comments field.

    The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Please review the
    [BSN Practicum: Program Start Before January 2025](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=15018) Campus page for more information.

    **Context**

    Nurses in all professional roles work to effect positive patient outcomes and improve organizational processes. Professional nurses are leaders in problem identification, planning, and strategy implementation—skills that directly affect patient care or organizational effectiveness.

    Too often, change agents jump to a conclusion that an intervention will promote the envisioned improvement. Instead, the ideal approach is to determine which interventions are appropriate, based on an assessment and review of credible evidence. Interventions could be patient-facing or involve a change in policy and process. In this assessment, you’ll identify and make the case for your practicum focus area, then explore it in depth from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to personal and professional practice.

    · Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to a defined patient, family, or population problem and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Resources

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Expand All

    **Leadership**

    The following article provides an in-depth review of the effect of transformational leadership in nursing:

    **## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx**

    In a 5-7 page written assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. Plan to spend approximately two direct practicum hours meeting with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    This assessment lays the foundation for the work that will carry you through your capstone experience and guide the practicum hours needed to complete the work in this course. In addition, it will enable you to do the following:

    · Develop a problem statement for a patient, family, or population that's relevant to your practice.

    · Begin building a body of evidence that will inform your approach to your practicum.

    · Focus on the influence of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the problem.

    **Preparation**

    In this assessment, you’ll assess the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Plan to spend approximately two hours working with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts about the problem (for example, directors of quality or patient safety, nurse managers/directors, physicians, and epidemiologists).

    To prepare for the assessment, complete the following:

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you want to work with during your practicum. The patient you select can be a friend or a family member. You’ll work with this patient, family, or group throughout your capstone project, focusing on a specific health care problem.

    · Begin surveying the scholarly and professional literature to establish your evidence and research base, inform your assessment, and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.

    In addition, you may wish to complete the following:

    · Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you’ll be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.

    · Review the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 1 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download), which provides guidance for conducting this portion of your practicum.

    **Note**: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s
    [Writing Support](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4646) page.

    **Instructions**

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    **Part 1**

    Use
    [Assessment 01 Supplement: Assessing the Problem: Leadership, Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and Policy Considerations [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483174/download?download_frd=1) to define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective and establish your evidence and research base to plan, implement, and share findings related to your project.

    **Part 2**

    Connect with the patient, family, or group you’ll work with during your practicum. During this portion of your practicum, plan to spend at least two hours meeting with the patient, family, or group and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. The hours you spend meeting with them should take place outside of regular work hours. Use the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207?wrap=1) [Download Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download?download_frd=1) provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061) Volunteer Experience Form.

    **Requirements**

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to your practice.

    · Summarize the problem you’ll explore.

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you intend to work with during your practicum.

    · Provide context, data, or information that substantiates the presence of the problem and its significance and relevance to the patient, family, or population.

    · Explain why this problem is relevant to your practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Note whether the authors provide supporting evidence from the literature that’s consistent with what you see in your nursing practice.

    · Explain how you would know if the data are unreliable.

    · Describe what the literature says about barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in addressing the problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of nursing standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe what the literature says about a nursing theory or conceptual framework that might frame and guide your actions during your practicum.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context of this problem.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Discuss research on the effectiveness of leadership strategies.

    · Define the role that you anticipate leadership must play in addressing the problem.

    · Describe collaboration and communication strategies that you anticipate will be needed to address the problem.

    · Describe the change management strategies that you anticipate will be required to address the problem.

    · Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Format**: Format your paper using APA style.
    [APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4243) is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:

    · A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.

    · Appropriate section headings.

    ·
    **Length**: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.

    ·
    **Supporting evidence**: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ·
    **Proofreading**: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

    **BSN Learner Time Reporting**

    Complete the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Include a description of your relationship to the patient, family, or group in the Volunteer Experience comments field.

    The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Please review the
    [BSN Practicum: Program Start Before January 2025](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=15018) Campus page for more information.

    **Context**

    Nurses in all professional roles work to effect positive patient outcomes and improve organizational processes. Professional nurses are leaders in problem identification, planning, and strategy implementation—skills that directly affect patient care or organizational effectiveness.

    Too often, change agents jump to a conclusion that an intervention will promote the envisioned improvement. Instead, the ideal approach is to determine which interventions are appropriate, based on an assessment and review of credible evidence. Interventions could be patient-facing or involve a change in policy and process. In this assessment, you’ll identify and make the case for your practicum focus area, then explore it in depth from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to personal and professional practice.

    · Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to a defined patient, family, or population problem and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Resources

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Expand All

    **Leadership**

    The following article provides an in-depth review of the effect of transformational leadership in nursing:

    **## nurs-fpx4900-assessment-01-supplement-assessing-the-problem-A.pdf**

    1

    Assessment 01 – Assessing the Problem: Leadership,

    Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and
    Policy Considerations

    For this assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the
    focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration,
    communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first select one of the following
    to be the problem you focus on for your capstone project:

    • Patient Health Problems
    o Obesity: A medical condition characterized by an excessive amount of body fat.

    Obesity increases the risk of various diseases, including heart disease, diabetes,
    and certain cancers. The management of obesity involves dietary changes,
    physical activity, and sometimes medication or surgery.

    o Cancer: A group of diseases characterized by the uncontrolled growth and
    spread of abnormal cells. There are many types of cancer, including breast, lung,
    and colon cancer. Treatment varies based on the type and stage and may
    include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and other therapies.

    • Family Health Problems
    o Alcoholism: A chronic disease characterized by uncontrolled drinking and a

    preoccupation with alcohol. Alcoholism can have profound effects on family
    dynamics, leading to financial difficulties, neglect, and strained relationships.

    o Tobacco Addiction: A dependence on nicotine, primarily from smoking
    cigarettes or using smokeless tobacco products. Tobacco addiction poses
    significant health risks to the user and can expose family members to harmful
    secondhand smoke.

    • Population Health Problems

    o Diabetes: A chronic metabolic disorder where the body cannot regulate blood
    sugar levels, leading to a range of complications. At a population level, diabetes
    is associated with lifestyle factors, genetics, and access to healthcare.

    o Congestive Heart Failure: A condition where the heart doesn't pump blood as
    efficiently as it should, leading to symptoms like shortness of breath and fatigue.
    Congestive heart failure is a major public health concern due to its high
    prevalence and associated hospitalizations.

    These health problems are significant challenges for healthcare providers and public health
    experts. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach that includes preventive

    2

    measures, early detection, and effective treatment strategies. Education and awareness
    campaigns, community engagement, and policy changes are also essential to improving
    population health outcomes.

    After you have selected one of the problems from the list above, return to the detailed
    instructions in the courseroom to complete your assessment.

    **## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx**

    In a 5-7 page written assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. Plan to spend approximately two direct practicum hours meeting with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    This assessment lays the foundation for the work that will carry you through your capstone experience and guide the practicum hours needed to complete the work in this course. In addition, it will enable you to do the following:

    · Develop a problem statement for a patient, family, or population that's relevant to your practice.

    · Begin building a body of evidence that will inform your approach to your practicum.

    · Focus on the influence of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the problem.

    **Preparation**

    In this assessment, you’ll assess the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Plan to spend approximately two hours working with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts about the problem (for example, directors of quality or patient safety, nurse managers/directors, physicians, and epidemiologists).

    To prepare for the assessment, complete the following:

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you want to work with during your practicum. The patient you select can be a friend or a family member. You’ll work with this patient, family, or group throughout your capstone project, focusing on a specific health care problem.

    · Begin surveying the scholarly and professional literature to establish your evidence and research base, inform your assessment, and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.

    In addition, you may wish to complete the following:

    · Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you’ll be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.

    · Review the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 1 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download), which provides guidance for conducting this portion of your practicum.

    **Note**: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s
    [Writing Support](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4646) page.

    **Instructions**

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    **Part 1**

    Use
    [Assessment 01 Supplement: Assessing the Problem: Leadership, Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and Policy Considerations [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483174/download?download_frd=1) to define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective and establish your evidence and research base to plan, implement, and share findings related to your project.

    **Part 2**

    Connect with the patient, family, or group you’ll work with during your practicum. During this portion of your practicum, plan to spend at least two hours meeting with the patient, family, or group and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. The hours you spend meeting with them should take place outside of regular work hours. Use the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207?wrap=1) [Download Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download?download_frd=1) provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061) Volunteer Experience Form.

    **Requirements**

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to your practice.

    · Summarize the problem you’ll explore.

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you intend to work with during your practicum.

    · Provide context, data, or information that substantiates the presence of the problem and its significance and relevance to the patient, family, or population.

    · Explain why this problem is relevant to your practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Note whether the authors provide supporting evidence from the literature that’s consistent with what you see in your nursing practice.

    · Explain how you would know if the data are unreliable.

    · Describe what the literature says about barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in addressing the problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of nursing standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe what the literature says about a nursing theory or conceptual framework that might frame and guide your actions during your practicum.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context of this problem.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Discuss research on the effectiveness of leadership strategies.

    · Define the role that you anticipate leadership must play in addressing the problem.

    · Describe collaboration and communication strategies that you anticipate will be needed to address the problem.

    · Describe the change management strategies that you anticipate will be required to address the problem.

    · Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Format**: Format your paper using APA style.
    [APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4243) is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:

    · A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.

    · Appropriate section headings.

    ·
    **Length**: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.

    ·
    **Supporting evidence**: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ·
    **Proofreading**: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

    **BSN Learner Time Reporting**

    Complete the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Include a description of your relationship to the patient, family, or group in the Volunteer Experience comments field.

    The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Please review the
    [BSN Practicum: Program Start Before January 2025](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=15018) Campus page for more information.

    **Context**

    Nurses in all professional roles work to effect positive patient outcomes and improve organizational processes. Professional nurses are leaders in problem identification, planning, and strategy implementation—skills that directly affect patient care or organizational effectiveness.

    Too often, change agents jump to a conclusion that an intervention will promote the envisioned improvement. Instead, the ideal approach is to determine which interventions are appropriate, based on an assessment and review of credible evidence. Interventions could be patient-facing or involve a change in policy and process. In this assessment, you’ll identify and make the case for your practicum focus area, then explore it in depth from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to personal and professional practice.

    · Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to a defined patient, family, or population problem and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Resources

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Expand All

    **Leadership**

    The following article provides an in-depth review of the effect of transformational leadership in nursing:

    **## nurs-fpx4900-assessment-01-supplement-assessing-the-problem-A.pdf**

    1

    Assessment 01 – Assessing the Problem: Leadership,

    Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and
    Policy Considerations

    For this assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the
    focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration,
    communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first select one of the following
    to be the problem you focus on for your capstone project:

    • Patient Health Problems
    o Obesity: A medical condition characterized by an excessive amount of body fat.

    Obesity increases the risk of various diseases, including heart disease, diabetes,
    and certain cancers. The management of obesity involves dietary changes,
    physical activity, and sometimes medication or surgery.

    o Cancer: A group of diseases characterized by the uncontrolled growth and
    spread of abnormal cells. There are many types of cancer, including breast, lung,
    and colon cancer. Treatment varies based on the type and stage and may
    include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and other therapies.

    • Family Health Problems
    o Alcoholism: A chronic disease characterized by uncontrolled drinking and a

    preoccupation with alcohol. Alcoholism can have profound effects on family
    dynamics, leading to financial difficulties, neglect, and strained relationships.

    o Tobacco Addiction: A dependence on nicotine, primarily from smoking
    cigarettes or using smokeless tobacco products. Tobacco addiction poses
    significant health risks to the user and can expose family members to harmful
    secondhand smoke.

    • Population Health Problems

    o Diabetes: A chronic metabolic disorder where the body cannot regulate blood
    sugar levels, leading to a range of complications. At a population level, diabetes
    is associated with lifestyle factors, genetics, and access to healthcare.

    o Congestive Heart Failure: A condition where the heart doesn't pump blood as
    efficiently as it should, leading to symptoms like shortness of breath and fatigue.
    Congestive heart failure is a major public health concern due to its high
    prevalence and associated hospitalizations.

    These health problems are significant challenges for healthcare providers and public health
    experts. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach that includes preventive

    2

    measures, early detection, and effective treatment strategies. Education and awareness
    campaigns, community engagement, and policy changes are also essential to improving
    population health outcomes.

    After you have selected one of the problems from the list above, return to the detailed
    instructions in the courseroom to complete your assessment.

    **## Quinaccessmemt1cap.docx**

    In a 5-7 page written assessment, define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. Plan to spend approximately two direct practicum hours meeting with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    This assessment lays the foundation for the work that will carry you through your capstone experience and guide the practicum hours needed to complete the work in this course. In addition, it will enable you to do the following:

    · Develop a problem statement for a patient, family, or population that's relevant to your practice.

    · Begin building a body of evidence that will inform your approach to your practicum.

    · Focus on the influence of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the problem.

    **Preparation**

    In this assessment, you’ll assess the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Plan to spend approximately two hours working with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts about the problem (for example, directors of quality or patient safety, nurse managers/directors, physicians, and epidemiologists).

    To prepare for the assessment, complete the following:

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you want to work with during your practicum. The patient you select can be a friend or a family member. You’ll work with this patient, family, or group throughout your capstone project, focusing on a specific health care problem.

    · Begin surveying the scholarly and professional literature to establish your evidence and research base, inform your assessment, and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.

    In addition, you may wish to complete the following:

    · Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you’ll be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.

    · Review the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 1 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download), which provides guidance for conducting this portion of your practicum.

    **Note**: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s
    [Writing Support](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4646) page.

    **Instructions**

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    **Part 1**

    Use
    [Assessment 01 Supplement: Assessing the Problem: Leadership, Collaboration, Communication, Change Management, and Policy Considerations [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483174/download?download_frd=1) to define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective and establish your evidence and research base to plan, implement, and share findings related to your project.

    **Part 2**

    Connect with the patient, family, or group you’ll work with during your practicum. During this portion of your practicum, plan to spend at least two hours meeting with the patient, family, or group and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. The hours you spend meeting with them should take place outside of regular work hours. Use the
    [Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207?wrap=1) [Download Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/67484/files/13483207/download?download_frd=1) provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061) Volunteer Experience Form.

    **Requirements**

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to your practice.

    · Summarize the problem you’ll explore.

    · Identify the patient, family, or group you intend to work with during your practicum.

    · Provide context, data, or information that substantiates the presence of the problem and its significance and relevance to the patient, family, or population.

    · Explain why this problem is relevant to your practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Note whether the authors provide supporting evidence from the literature that’s consistent with what you see in your nursing practice.

    · Explain how you would know if the data are unreliable.

    · Describe what the literature says about barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in addressing the problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of nursing standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe what the literature says about a nursing theory or conceptual framework that might frame and guide your actions during your practicum.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving patient, family, or population outcomes for this problem.

    · Describe current literature on the role of nurses in policy making to improve outcomes, prevent illness, and reduce hospital readmissions.

    · Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context of this problem.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.

    · Discuss research on the effectiveness of leadership strategies.

    · Define the role that you anticipate leadership must play in addressing the problem.

    · Describe collaboration and communication strategies that you anticipate will be needed to address the problem.

    · Describe the change management strategies that you anticipate will be required to address the problem.

    · Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the BSN Learner Time Reporting Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Format**: Format your paper using APA style.
    [APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4243) is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:

    · A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.

    · Appropriate section headings.

    ·
    **Length**: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.

    ·
    **Supporting evidence**: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ·
    **Proofreading**: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

    **BSN Learner Time Reporting**

    Complete the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Include a description of your relationship to the patient, family, or group in the Volunteer Experience comments field.

    The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the
    [BSN Learner Time Reporting](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=7061). Please review the
    [BSN Practicum: Program Start Before January 2025](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=15018) Campus page for more information.

    **Context**

    Nurses in all professional roles work to effect positive patient outcomes and improve organizational processes. Professional nurses are leaders in problem identification, planning, and strategy implementation—skills that directly affect patient care or organizational effectiveness.

    Too often, change agents jump to a conclusion that an intervention will promote the envisioned improvement. Instead, the ideal approach is to determine which interventions are appropriate, based on an assessment and review of credible evidence. Interventions could be patient-facing or involve a change in policy and process. In this assessment, you’ll identify and make the case for your practicum focus area, then explore it in depth from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

    · Define a patient, family, or population health problem that’s relevant to personal and professional practice.

    · Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

    · Analyze evidence from peer-reviewed literature and professional sources that describes and guides nursing actions related to a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

    · Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies could affect a defined patient, family, or population problem.

    · Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

    · Propose leadership strategies to improve outcomes, patient-centered care, and the patient experience related to a defined patient, family, or population problem and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Resources

    Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

    Expand All

    **Leadership**

    The following article provides an in-depth review of the effect of transformational leadership in nursing:

  • [Solved] Final Project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [Assignment Overview:](https://nightingale.instructure.com/courses/3624955/assignments/39626677?module_item_id=91333179#tab-1) Hallmark Assignment objectives include: – Research and complete a concept map of the '5 Rights of Delegation'. – Apply the concept of clinical judgment to the Shadow Healt…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [Assignment Overview:](https://nightingale.instructure.com/courses/3624955/assignments/39626677?module_item_id=91333179#tab-1)

    Hallmark Assignment objectives include:

    – Research and complete a concept map of the '5 Rights of Delegation'.
    – Apply the concept of clinical judgment to the Shadow Health scenario and the teaching plan.
    – Create a PowerPoint presentation reflective of a comprehensive teaching plan for a group of new graduate registered nurses.

    his week you will build on your previous research and simulation experience to now create an in-service presentation for graduate nurses. You are the expert on delegation and plan to share your knowledge with your peers. Research, design, and submit a 'Delegation In-Service' PowerPoint presentation based on the guidelines below. This assignment should also follow 7th edition APA guidelines.

    Submit 7-12 PowerPoint slides. Utilize in-text citations as well as a reference slide.

    – [Slide Requirements:](https://nightingale.instructure.com/courses/3624955/assignments/39626677?module_item_id=91333179#tab-4)
    – [Slide Content:](https://nightingale.instructure.com/courses/3624955/assignments/39626677?module_item_id=91333179#tab-5)
    – [Additional Instructions:](https://nightingale.instructure.com/courses/3624955/assignments/39626677?module_item_id=91333179#tab-6)

    Slides should include the following:

    – Title slide
    – List and define the '5 Rights of Delegation'
    – Give an example of each of how a nurse will perform each.
    – You may use your prior research from the concept map assignment.
    – What tasks can never be delegated and must be performed by the registered nurse?
    – Identify and list at least 4 tasks.
    – Delegation to UAP:
    – Assuming a stable client, identify and list at least 3 tasks the RN commonly delegates to a UAP.
    – Delegation to LPN:
    – Assuming a stable client, identify and list at least 3 tasks the RN commonly delegates to an LPN.
    – Barriers to delegation include underdelegation, overdelegation, and improper delegation.
    – Define each of these and give at least 1 example of each.
    – Reference slide
    – Slide Content:
    – Key Points: Utilize concise phrases on each slide.
    – Visual Aids: Incorporate graphs, images, or diagrams to enhance understanding and engagement.
    – Additional Instructions:
    – Conduct research to support your content and findings.
    – Use as many references as needed to produce a professional presentation.
    – Ensure clear definitions and practical examples accompany each topic on the slides.

    Please upload the .pptx files.

  • [Solved] lorem, ipsum

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## populationhealthunit4instructions.docx **## populationhealthunit4instructions.docx** For this presentation assignment, reflect back on the data reviewed for the unit 1 discussion assignment and the significant health or health-related problem the data identified for this populatio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## populationhealthunit4instructions.docx

    **## populationhealthunit4instructions.docx**

    For this presentation assignment, reflect back on the data reviewed for the unit 1 discussion assignment and the significant health or health-related problem the data identified for this population.

    Using PowerPoint, Prezi, Google Slides, Canva, or another presentation tool, create a presentation that includes the following elements:

    ·
    **Slide 1** – Tile Slide

    ·
    **Slide 2:** Introduction to the population that you sourced information/data about for the unit 1 discussion

    ·
    **Slides 3-4**(more if needed): The population health data you sourced to identify a significant health or health-related problem for this population. Be sure to include in-text citations for the source(s) you obtained the data.

    ·
    **Slides 5-6**(or more if needed
    **)**: Based on your review/analysis of the data you sourced, provide a rationale for your identification of the significant health or health-related problem. Support your rationale with in-text citations to the sources you reviewed that identify this as a significant problem.

    ·
    **Slide 7** (or appropriate number): A References slide with citations formatted consistent with 7th edition APA guidelines.

    **NOTE**: advanced graduate-level scholarship requires a well-articulated and in-depth overview of the required concepts; consider utilizing the ‘Notes’ section of the slide
    **if needed** to provide additional details

    **The assignment requires you to upload a file of the full-text article for all of your resources for faculty to review. The assignment will earn no more than "emerging" points for supporting evidence and analysis without the PDFs of all listed articles.**

    **## populationhealthunit4instructions.docx**

    For this presentation assignment, reflect back on the data reviewed for the unit 1 discussion assignment and the significant health or health-related problem the data identified for this population.

    Using PowerPoint, Prezi, Google Slides, Canva, or another presentation tool, create a presentation that includes the following elements:

    ·
    **Slide 1** – Tile Slide

    ·
    **Slide 2:** Introduction to the population that you sourced information/data about for the unit 1 discussion

    ·
    **Slides 3-4**(more if needed): The population health data you sourced to identify a significant health or health-related problem for this population. Be sure to include in-text citations for the source(s) you obtained the data.

    ·
    **Slides 5-6**(or more if needed
    **)**: Based on your review/analysis of the data you sourced, provide a rationale for your identification of the significant health or health-related problem. Support your rationale with in-text citations to the sources you reviewed that identify this as a significant problem.

    ·
    **Slide 7** (or appropriate number): A References slide with citations formatted consistent with 7th edition APA guidelines.

    **NOTE**: advanced graduate-level scholarship requires a well-articulated and in-depth overview of the required concepts; consider utilizing the ‘Notes’ section of the slide
    **if needed** to provide additional details

    **The assignment requires you to upload a file of the full-text article for all of your resources for faculty to review. The assignment will earn no more than "emerging" points for supporting evidence and analysis without the PDFs of all listed articles.**

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Discussion Board Instructions:** Goal-setting and creating an action plan to achieve those goals is part of professional practice and a tool to encourage continued growth. After completing your SWOT Analysis, create and share your goals and action plan with your peers. 1. Create goals: In your SW…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Discussion Board Instructions:**

    Goal-setting and creating an action plan to achieve those goals is part of professional practice and a tool to encourage continued growth. After completing your SWOT Analysis, create and share your goals and action plan with your peers.

    1. Create goals: In your SWOT Analysis, you defined your weaknesses and identified resources to help support you. As you approach the end of your nursing program, create 2-3 professional SMART goals you want to achieve before you take NCLEX. Share these with your peers.

    2. Create a plan: Identify at least 3 interventions you will implement to achieve your goals.

    3. Create Community: While you are following different paths in life, you are all here with one common goal – to be a Registered Nurse. Take this opportunity to offer words of encouragement or post a motivational quote for your peers.

    Your initial post should be a minimum of 250 words.

  • [Solved] SWOT analysis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    A SWOT analysis is often applied to business or organizations to help them assess the health of their infrastructure and how they align against their competition. It can also be applied to an individual to assess their current situation (Teoli et al., 2023). When you clearly identify your internal w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    A SWOT analysis is often applied to business or organizations to help them assess the health of their infrastructure and how they align against their competition. It can also be applied to an individual to assess their current situation (Teoli et al., 2023). When you clearly identify your internal weaknesses and external threats to success, you can address them.

    ![SWOT.png](https://nightingale.instructure.com/courses/3624955/files/279721234/preview)

    You will perform self-introspection and create an [Individual SWOT Analysis](https://nightingale.instructure.com/courses/3624955/files/279720941?wrap=1) [Download Individual SWOT Analysis](https://nightingale.instructure.com/courses/3624955/files/279720941/download?download_frd=1) related to your NCLEX preparation. Consider the following topics. Reflect on each item, then categorize it by adding the them to the SWOT template. You do not need to use complete sentences within the template; bullet-point lists are acceptable.

    No two SWOT Analyses will be the same. Items to be added are:

    – 3 or 4 nursing concepts that are strengths
    – 3 or 4 nursing concepts that are weaknesses
    – Test-taking skills
    – NGN items
    – Performance on application-based case studies
    – Past HESI scores
    – Knowledge of underlying disease pathophysiology
    – Time management skills
    – Study skills
    – Family and friend support
    – Self-care
    – Motivation and determination for success
    – Work/life/school balance

    After you have created your SWOT Analysis, reflect on the final results. Record your answers to these questions on the same Word doc as your SWOT Analysis. Use complete sentences, but be clear and concise in your answers. Your submission should be 1-2 pages in length.

    – Where did you categorize self-care? What are things you can do for yourself to help keep stress at a manageable level?
    – At this point in your education, on a scale of 1-10 with 1 being ‘not prepared at all’ to 10 ‘very confident’, how would you rate yourself on your progress towards NCLEX preparation? Explain why you chose this rating.
    – How can you turn your weakness and threats into strengths and opportunities? What resources at Nightingale can help you? What community resources can help you?

    – [\
    \
    SWOT331335.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/swot331335-docx "SWOT331335.docx")

  • [Solved] Conduct focused and comprehensive health histories and examinations for various patient populations.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Conduct focused and comprehensive health histories and examinations for various patient populations.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Conduct focused and comprehensive health histories and examinations for various patient populations.