Tag: Clinical Nursing & Patient Care

[Solved] lorem

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering lorem.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Nursing Assignment Description: 2-DNP-870

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**Care Dilemma Case Study** **files (2)** – ## Module2Assignment.docx – ## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx **## Module2Assignment.docx** **Assignment Description:** **Advocacy Essay: Care Dilemma Case Study** Write a 2500-word essay addressing the care dilemma case study. Be sure to completely answer …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**Care Dilemma Case Study**

**files (2)**

– ## Module2Assignment.docx

– ## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

**## Module2Assignment.docx**

**Assignment Description:**

**Advocacy Essay: Care Dilemma Case Study**

Write a 2500-word essay addressing the care dilemma case study. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. This should be an advocacy essay focused on local policymakers. Support your ideas with at l
**east FOUR (4) sources in your essay.** Make sure to reference the citations in APA style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

· In a small community outside of a large metropolitan area, there is a free clinic that provides care to the working poor, which is primarily Hispanic. Thirty-five percent of the population have diabetes and are prescribed oral medications. Patients have their blood glucose checked at their monthly appointments. Half of the patients miss their monthly appointments as they cannot leave their jobs to go to the clinic.

· Identify the care dilemma experienced by this population and how the factors of the social determinants of health are impacting their ability to receive care, access medical devices, and promote a healthy lifestyle.

· Describe a viable solution to this care dilemma.

· Describe a health policy and why it should be supported with evidence-based rationale.

**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

·
**Length**: 2500 words

·
**Structure**: Include a title page and reference slide in APA style. These do not count toward the minimal word slide count for this assignment.

·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least
**FOUR (4)** scholarly sources to support your claims.

· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

Required Resources

Porche, D. J. (2023).
_Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapter 6.

**## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

–

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

–

stand; does not ad

–

dress many assign

–

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

–

tion to the assign

–

ment topic.

points

21

Topic is mostly cov

–

ered and appropri

–

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

–

quately demonstrate

accurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

–

propriate to assign

–

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

–

sions is evident;

clear and under

–

standable; ad

–

dresses all of the re

–

quirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

–

ing clarity and ex

–

planation of con

–

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

–

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

–

cused details.

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

–

propriate or do not

address given audi

–

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

–

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

–

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

–

ate to given audi

–

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

–

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

–

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

–

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

–

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

–

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

–

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

–

cific, purposeful, dy

–

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

–

dard, written, aca

–

demic English.

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

70

points minimum

**Level 3**

80

points minimum

**Level 4**

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

**## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

–

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

–

stand; does not ad

–

dress many assign

–

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

–

tion to the assign

–

ment topic.

points

21

Topic is mostly cov

–

ered and appropri

–

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

–

quately demonstrate

accurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

–

propriate to assign

–

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

–

sions is evident;

clear and under

–

standable; ad

–

dresses all of the re

–

quirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

–

ing clarity and ex

–

planation of con

–

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

–

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

–

cused details.

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

–

propriate or do not

address given audi

–

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

–

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

–

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

–

ate to given audi

–

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

–

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

–

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

–

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

–

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

–

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

–

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

–

cific, purposeful, dy

–

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

–

dard, written, aca

–

demic English.

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

70

points minimum

**Level 3**

80

points minimum

**Level 4**

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

**## Module2Assignment.docx**

**Assignment Description:**

**Advocacy Essay: Care Dilemma Case Study**

Write a 2500-word essay addressing the care dilemma case study. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. This should be an advocacy essay focused on local policymakers. Support your ideas with at l
**east FOUR (4) sources in your essay.** Make sure to reference the citations in APA style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

· In a small community outside of a large metropolitan area, there is a free clinic that provides care to the working poor, which is primarily Hispanic. Thirty-five percent of the population have diabetes and are prescribed oral medications. Patients have their blood glucose checked at their monthly appointments. Half of the patients miss their monthly appointments as they cannot leave their jobs to go to the clinic.

· Identify the care dilemma experienced by this population and how the factors of the social determinants of health are impacting their ability to receive care, access medical devices, and promote a healthy lifestyle.

· Describe a viable solution to this care dilemma.

· Describe a health policy and why it should be supported with evidence-based rationale.

**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

·
**Length**: 2500 words

·
**Structure**: Include a title page and reference slide in APA style. These do not count toward the minimal word slide count for this assignment.

·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least
**FOUR (4)** scholarly sources to support your claims.

· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

Required Resources

Porche, D. J. (2023).
_Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapter 6.

**## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

–

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

–

stand; does not ad

–

dress many assign

–

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

–

tion to the assign

–

ment topic.

points

21

Topic is mostly cov

–

ered and appropri

–

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

–

quately demonstrate

accurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

–

propriate to assign

–

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

–

sions is evident;

clear and under

–

standable; ad

–

dresses all of the re

–

quirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

–

ing clarity and ex

–

planation of con

–

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

–

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

–

cused details.

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

–

propriate or do not

address given audi

–

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

–

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

–

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

–

ate to given audi

–

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

–

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

–

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

–

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

–

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

–

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

–

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

–

cific, purposeful, dy

–

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

–

dard, written, aca

–

demic English.

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

70

points minimum

**Level 3**

80

points minimum

**Level 4**

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

**## Module2Assignment.docx**

**Assignment Description:**

**Advocacy Essay: Care Dilemma Case Study**

Write a 2500-word essay addressing the care dilemma case study. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. This should be an advocacy essay focused on local policymakers. Support your ideas with at l
**east FOUR (4) sources in your essay.** Make sure to reference the citations in APA style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

· In a small community outside of a large metropolitan area, there is a free clinic that provides care to the working poor, which is primarily Hispanic. Thirty-five percent of the population have diabetes and are prescribed oral medications. Patients have their blood glucose checked at their monthly appointments. Half of the patients miss their monthly appointments as they cannot leave their jobs to go to the clinic.

· Identify the care dilemma experienced by this population and how the factors of the social determinants of health are impacting their ability to receive care, access medical devices, and promote a healthy lifestyle.

· Describe a viable solution to this care dilemma.

· Describe a health policy and why it should be supported with evidence-based rationale.

**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**

·
**Length**: 2500 words

·
**Structure**: Include a title page and reference slide in APA style. These do not count toward the minimal word slide count for this assignment.

·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least
**FOUR (4)** scholarly sources to support your claims.

· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

Required Resources

Porche, D. J. (2023).
_Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapter 6.

**## Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

–

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

–

stand; does not ad

–

dress many assign

–

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

–

tion to the assign

–

ment topic.

points

21

Topic is mostly cov

–

ered and appropri

–

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

–

quately demonstrate

accurate under

–

standing of con

–

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

–

propriate to assign

–

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

–

sions is evident;

clear and under

–

standable; ad

–

dresses all of the re

–

quirements of the

assignment descrip

–

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

–

ing clarity and ex

–

planation of con

–

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

–

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

–

cused details.

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
| Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

–

propriate or do not

address given audi

–

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

–

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

–

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

–

ate to given audi

–

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

–

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

–

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

–

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

–

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

–

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

–

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

–

cific, purposeful, dy

–

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

–

dard, written, aca

–

demic English.

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

Criteria

**Does Not Meet 0%**

**Approaches 70%**

**Meets 80%**

**Exceeds 100%**

**Criterion Score**

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

70

points minimum

**Level 3**

80

points minimum

**Level 4**

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Nursing Assignment 5 603

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Assignment 5 603.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Diversity wk 9

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the general population. Discuss the leading causes of death and illness among Hispanic Americans and the options the Advanced Practice Nurse has to overcome the disparity of healthcare for this population.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the general population. Discuss the leading causes of death and illness among Hispanic Americans and the options the Advanced Practice Nurse has to overcome the disparity of healthcare for this population.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] YISE W5 LEADER

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Data to support patient care comes from a variety of sources that contain differing data types. Key activities to use clinical data include identifying the sources of data, understanding the data types and associated methods to work with the data, and identifying the necessary resources to complete …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Data to support patient care comes from a variety of sources that contain differing data types. Key activities to use clinical data include identifying the sources of data, understanding the data types and associated methods to work with the data, and identifying the necessary resources to complete your IT project.

The scope of your IT project will determine the level of data access required and the associated data storage needs. Data used in multisite projects will require IRB oversight and often require the execution of a DUA if transferring data outside of the institution or receiving data from another institution.

Identifying and assembling an adequate project team is based on the needs of the project. At a minimum, you will need to include frontline staff that will use the product, a data analyst capable of completing the ETL process on the data, and potentially statisticians to conduct appropriate model building and outcomes analyses.

There are multiple approaches to analyzing data. AI is the latest advance in machine learning approaches that include supervised, in which data is labeled and the algorithm is guided with statistical considerations, and unsupervised, in which unlabeled data is used to infer meaning. While robust, machine learning approaches require interdisciplinary teams and large resource dedication to complete.

All projects require review and potential revision over time. Follow-up and review of implemented programs should be included in the initial planning stages and resource allocation decisions at project inception.

**Let us consider the following for the quality improvement project:**

You are a new manager on your Heart Failure/Cardiac step-down unit and have high hopes for your floor.

**Identify several IT projects that you as the nurse manager of a nursing unit could develop to support the operations of the nursing floor to promote compliance with daily weights for your HF patients.**

As you do your RCA analysis you realize that compliance to many of the issues causing experiences on your floor is due to the poor health data literacy within your nursing staff. **Why is it important for nurse leaders to develop health data literacy?**

-As you begin to form your team for your IT projects you question yourself as to who will comprise the team.

**Who are the various team members to consider adding to the team? Identify their roles and contributions to the project.**

Remember this assignment is 20% of your grade.

**REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

Should be minimally 7 pages, but NO MORE than 9 pages, not counting references and cover page.

CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT

November 6, 2026
[Solved] YISE W 4-

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Refer to Chapter 14. NOTE THE ATTACHED ITEM **Create a brief survey aimed at assessing the level of awareness among the healthcare providers to identify which routine actions could be the source of exposure to PHI and the ways to minimize this exposure.** **Explain why you chose the questions you di…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Refer to Chapter 14. NOTE THE ATTACHED ITEM

**Create a brief survey aimed at assessing the level of awareness among the healthcare providers to identify which routine actions could be the source of exposure to PHI and the ways to minimize this exposure.** **Explain why you chose the questions you did utilizing EBP to support your positions. Ensure you have an introduction and conclusion.**

Please ensure you use evidence-based practice in determining which methods to use for your survey. Please note the grading rubric. The submission should be minimally 3 pages not counting the cover page and references.

CAN'T have more 10% plagiarism or AI text. references within the past 5 years with doi#

due date July 17, 2026

– [\
\
5de208ac59d27b0f931eaca0_common-hipaa-violations-2.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/5de208ac59d27b0f931eaca0-common-hipaa-violations-2-png-10576069 "5de208ac59d27b0f931eaca0_common-hipaa-violations-2.png")

November 6, 2026
[Solved] YISE-LEADER W4

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community** _(Examine how healthcare services in_ _**your specific ZIP code**_ _( 33126 )are providing telehealth and remote monitoring options and whether these services benefit the patient population.)_ ### **Assignment Overview** **In this assignm…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community** _(Examine how healthcare services in_ _**your specific ZIP code**_ _( 33126 )are providing telehealth and remote monitoring options and whether these services benefit the patient population.)_

### **Assignment Overview**

**In this assignment , you will evaluate the extent to which healthcare services in your specific geographic area (use your ZIP code for specificity- NAME YOUR actual CITY where you live) ( 33126 MIAMI FLORIDA) are offering telehealth and remote monitoring options. You will analyze the impact of these services on patient care and outcomes. Your submission must include at least three examples that you uncovered through research in your neighborhood.**

### **Requirements**

**Format and Length:**

– The assignment must be written as a formal .
– It must include an introduction, graduate-level discussion questions and responses, and a conclusion that synthesizes your key points.
– **The assignment should be a minimum of 3 pages in length, excluding the cover page and reference list.**

**Content Specifics:**

– **Introduction:**
– Introduce the topic with background information on telehealth and remote monitoring.
– Clearly state the purpose of your assignment
– Provide your ZIP code to contextualize the geographic focus of your study.
– **Graduate-Level Questions & Analysis:**
– Develop and answer at least two or three in-depth, graduate-level questions related to:
– How telehealth and remote monitoring options are integrated into local healthcare services.
– The benefits (or perceived benefits) these options offer to the patient population.
– Potential challenges or limitations associated with these technological advances.
– Make sure to substantiate your analysis with evidence-based practice (EBP). This should include referencing scholarly articles, government or institutional reports, and credible online sources.
– Include at least three concrete examples from your research in your local neighborhood that illustrate how these services are implemented. Explain how each example supports your discussion.
– **Conclusion:**
– Summarize your findings.
– Synthesize the key points discussed in your assignment.
– Reflect on the overall impact of telehealth and remote monitoring services on patient care in your area.

**APA Format:**

– Must strictly adhere to APA 7th Edition guidelines.
– Ensure correct use of APA formatting for the title page, headings/levels, in-text citations, and the reference list.
– Double-check that all references are accurately cited within your text and that your reference list is complete.

**Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):**

– Develop your answers and support your analysis with evidence-based research.
– Incorporate data, statistics, and findings from peer-reviewed literature and reputable sources to lend credibility to your discussion.
– 4 current sources must be used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. All REFERENCES must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up

**CAN'T HAVE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AIT TEXT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNITIN**

**DUE DATE JULY 15, 2026**

**ALL SECTIONS NEED IT HEADING TO IDENTIFY IT**

**ALL MUST ME MEET**

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Project 2

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**Instructions:** 1. Create a 8 slide PowerPoint presentation summarizing the type of CAM you selected (Anma). 2. When you prepare your PowerPoint, be sure that the viewer will know the following six (6) items: 1. What the CAM practice actually is? 2. Who are its practitioners? 3. How it is typicall…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**Instructions:**

1. Create a 8 slide PowerPoint presentation summarizing the type of CAM you selected (Anma).
2. When you prepare your PowerPoint, be sure that the viewer will know the following six (6) items:
1. What the CAM practice actually is?
2. Who are its practitioners?
3. How it is typically used?
4. Why people use this type of CAM?
5. Its current status in the Medical world.
6. What evidence is there that supports its use?
3. If you use graphics in your presentation, please be sure that they are small in size and suitable for the PowerPoint format.
4. Title your presentation with the subject of your presentation.
– Type the title of your presentation in the subject line.
– Use standard English grammar and spelling in your responses.
– Visually engaging, well organized, for your errors, and follows formatting guidelines.
– Actively engages in discussion, response demonstrates deep understanding, includes strong, relevant evidence from credible sources.
– Discusses current standing in the medical field with references or context, provides thoughtful reasons, supported by evidence, or examples, explains common uses with examples and context.
– Identifies and describes practitioners with clarity, including qualifications and roles, and clearly and thoroughly explains the CAM practice with relevant details and examples.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Literature review

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

what is the use of clinical outcomes?

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

what is the use of clinical outcomes?

November 6, 2026
[Solved] nursing

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering nursing.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 6, 2026