My Blog

Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] W2660

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Physiology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-physiology) Provide connection between the changes in HC leadership practices and expectations and participation in professional membership groups, grass roots organizations and lobbyists – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Physiology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-physiology)

    Provide connection between the changes in HC leadership practices and expectations and participation in professional membership groups, grass roots organizations and lobbyists

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Validating a Resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Validating a Resource** – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx – ## Module3.docx **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx** HIM377 Project Milestone Validating a Resource Name: Directions: Using the space provided below, you wi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Validating a Resource**

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx

    – ## Module3.docx

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

  • [Solved] using PCgive to do Econometrics work 48hous

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Economics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-economics) Testing the PPP for the Pound Sterling / US dollarWrite a two page paper, excluding charts and regression results, assessing the empirical support for PPP for the US Dollar – British pound: 1791-2015 Formulate a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Economics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-economics)

    Testing the PPP for the Pound Sterling / US dollarWrite a two page paper, excluding charts and regression results, assessing the empirical support for PPP for the US Dollar – British pound: 1791-2015

    Formulate a model that allows testing whether PPP holds

    Estimate the parameters of that model using the files in the Data for Pound Sterling and PPP

    Report

    the test result for PPP the fit of the model

    the assumed parameter constancy

    the sensitivity to whether the variables are expressed in logs or  not

    you should have pcgive software, if you dont i have to send you, is a 300mb file

    – [\
    \
    BoE_PPP.bn7](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/boe-ppp-bn7-10159819 "BoE_PPP.bn7")
    – [\
    \
    BoE_PPP.in7](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/boe-ppp-in7-10159821 "BoE_PPP.in7")
    – [\
    \
    BoE_PPP.oxdata](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/boe-ppp-oxdata-10159823 "BoE_PPP.oxdata")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] United States Preventive Service Taskforce

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following: – Cervical cancer – Breast cancer – Osteoporosis – Colorectal cancer – Lung cancer – Ovarian cancer – Intimate partner violence (IPV). – [\ \ S…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following:

    – Cervical cancer
    – Breast cancer
    – Osteoporosis
    – Colorectal cancer
    – Lung cancer
    – Ovarian cancer
    – Intimate partner violence (IPV).

    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-01-19at2.59.58AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-19at2-59-58am-png "ScreenShot2025-01-19at2.59.58AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-01-19at3.00.13AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-19at3-00-13am-png "ScreenShot2025-01-19at3.00.13AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-01-19at3.00.20AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-19at3-00-20am-png "ScreenShot2025-01-19at3.00.20AM.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Transportation paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) help with 3-5 paper – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    help with 3-5 paper

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Test 1: gradient descent issues

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Machine Learning homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science-machine-learning) For each of the following assertions, support your answer with examples or counterexamples: 1. For any local-search problem, hill-climbing will return a global optimum if the algorithm is run start…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Machine Learning homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science-machine-learning)

    For each of the following assertions, support your answer with examples or counterexamples:

    1. For any local-search problem, hill-climbing will return a global optimum if the algorithm is run starting at any state that is a neighbor of a neighbor of a globally optimal state.
    2. In a nondeterministic, partially observable problem, improving an agent’s transition model (i.e., eliminating spurious outcomes that never actually occur) will never increase the size of the agent’s belief states.
    3. Stochastic hill climbing is guaranteed to arrive at a global optimum.
    4. In a continuous space, gradient descent with a fixed step size is guaranteed to converge to a local or global optimum.
    5. Gradient descent finds the global optimum from any starting point if and only if the function is convex.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Research psych smoking study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## psych350week1.docx **## psych350week1.docx** Read the hypothetical study and discuss any problems you find with the way in which the study was conducted, the author's conclusions, or the way in which the article was written. **Effect of Smoking on Management Performa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## psych350week1.docx

    **## psych350week1.docx**

    Read the hypothetical study and discuss any problems you find with the way in which the study was conducted, the author's conclusions, or the way in which the article was written.

    **Effect of Smoking on Management Performance**

    **Winston Butts Vantage University**

    In recent years, many organizations have implemented programs to encourage employees to stop smoking (Ash, 1971). This movement toward decreasing smoking in the workplace is an attempt to reduce health care costs as well as satisfy the rights of nonsmokers (Butts, 1975).

    However, research on the effects of these programs is mixed. Whereas some studies support the idea of financial savings (e.g., Stogie, 1970), others have shown no improvements in employee health or increases in organizational profits. Because of this lack of consistency, it is the purpose of the present study to determine if smoking might actually increase performance.

    Method

    **Participants**

        The participants in the study were 15 managers employed by a large manufacturer of munitions and blasting caps. Eight of the managers smoked at work, and seven of the managers were nonsmokers. Ten of the managers were women and five were men. The mean age of the managers was 36.3, with the youngest being 21 and the oldest 65.

    Procedure

        The experimenter spent 10 days at the organization observing the 15 managers. Each time a manager did something right, he was given a point. Each time a manager did something wrong, a point was deducted. At the end of the 10 days, a manager's performance was determined by his total number of points.

    Results and Discussion

         The managers' performance scores were correlated with their smoking status. The results of this analysis indicated a correlation coefficient of .20. Though the correlation coefficient was not statistically significant, it was in the predicted direction. In other words, managers who smoked performed better than those who did not. Thus, the results of this study indicate that smoking causes better managerial performance.

         One reason for this finding might be that smoking allows a manager to calm down when he is anxious, thus resulting in better performance (Puffer, 1971). Another reason might be that smoking is a sign of status and maturity (Burns, 1978) and good managers smoke to enhance their image. On the basis of the results of this study, organizations should either hire managers who smoke or get their nonsmoking managers to start smoking.

    **## psych350week1.docx**

    Read the hypothetical study and discuss any problems you find with the way in which the study was conducted, the author's conclusions, or the way in which the article was written.

    **Effect of Smoking on Management Performance**

    **Winston Butts Vantage University**

    In recent years, many organizations have implemented programs to encourage employees to stop smoking (Ash, 1971). This movement toward decreasing smoking in the workplace is an attempt to reduce health care costs as well as satisfy the rights of nonsmokers (Butts, 1975).

    However, research on the effects of these programs is mixed. Whereas some studies support the idea of financial savings (e.g., Stogie, 1970), others have shown no improvements in employee health or increases in organizational profits. Because of this lack of consistency, it is the purpose of the present study to determine if smoking might actually increase performance.

    Method

    **Participants**

        The participants in the study were 15 managers employed by a large manufacturer of munitions and blasting caps. Eight of the managers smoked at work, and seven of the managers were nonsmokers. Ten of the managers were women and five were men. The mean age of the managers was 36.3, with the youngest being 21 and the oldest 65.

    Procedure

        The experimenter spent 10 days at the organization observing the 15 managers. Each time a manager did something right, he was given a point. Each time a manager did something wrong, a point was deducted. At the end of the 10 days, a manager's performance was determined by his total number of points.

    Results and Discussion

         The managers' performance scores were correlated with their smoking status. The results of this analysis indicated a correlation coefficient of .20. Though the correlation coefficient was not statistically significant, it was in the predicted direction. In other words, managers who smoked performed better than those who did not. Thus, the results of this study indicate that smoking causes better managerial performance.

         One reason for this finding might be that smoking allows a manager to calm down when he is anxious, thus resulting in better performance (Puffer, 1971). Another reason might be that smoking is a sign of status and maturity (Burns, 1978) and good managers smoke to enhance their image. On the basis of the results of this study, organizations should either hire managers who smoke or get their nonsmoking managers to start smoking.

  • [Solved] discussion 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering discussion 3.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Reading IDS 3336- Assignment #1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Instructions** 1. Answer each separately in **a specific** manner by **making specific connections** **between this week's assigned readings/ videos and your reflection**. Please add in-text reference when necessary. ## **Reading Questions** 1. Why does Ken Robinson believe Art is less valued i…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Instructions**

    1. Answer each separately in **a specific** manner by **making specific connections** **between this week's assigned readings/ videos and your reflection**. Please add in-text reference when necessary.

    ## **Reading Questions**

    1. Why does Ken Robinson believe Art is less valued in our education system than subjects like Math and Science? Do you agree? Why/Why not?

    2. Ken Robinson and Csiksentmihalyi talk about (in different ways) the role of the body and movement in facilitating creativity:

    a) What do they specifically say?

    b) Does bodily movement affect creativity in your experience?

    3. Csikszentmihalyi describes some forms of entertainment as keeping us from creativity (bottom of p 348).

    a) What is his argument? Do you agree?

    b) Can forms of entertainment also encourage creativity?

    c) What role does a person’s environment have on creativity?  Give examples.

    4. Based on the reading from Spivey, how are imagination, art, and creativity related?

    5. Csikszentmihalyi describes a relationship between creativity and the struggle against problems and obstacles:

    a) What does the author specifically say?

    b) Do you agree? Why/Why not?

    VIDEO REFERENCES:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NgB3qSKD_o

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQWKpKbvc9M

    https://www.ted.com/talks/sir_ken_robinson_do_schools_kill_creativity

    READING ATTACHED

    – [\
    \
    Csikszentmihalyi_1996_-_Ch_14_-_Enhancing_Personal_Creativity-1-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/csikszentmihalyi-1996-ch-14-enhancing-personal-creativity-1-1-pdf-10160271 "Csikszentmihalyi_1996_-_Ch_14_-_Enhancing_Personal_Creativity-1-1.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    SpiveyNigelTheBirthOfTheImagination-1-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/spiveynigelthebirthoftheimagination-1-1-pdf-10160273 "SpiveyNigelTheBirthOfTheImagination-1-1.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] madam michelle

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering madam michelle.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.