Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] cdassign2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    students will collect documentation to put together a potential family newsletter. Will upload more information on how to do assignment soon

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    students will collect documentation to put together a potential family newsletter.
    Will upload more information on how to do assignment soon

  • [Solved] ED4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering ED4.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Cherokee

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## HIS131–DocumentAnalysis3Section001AFall2025.pdf – Cherokees-1.pdf **## HIS131–DocumentAnalysis3Section001AFall2025.pdf** 1 HIS 131—Document Analysis #3 Your Name: ____________________ Title of Document: The Cherokees Resist Removal, 1830 (**It is the second document cont…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## HIS131–DocumentAnalysis3Section001AFall2025.pdf

    – Cherokees-1.pdf

    **## HIS131–DocumentAnalysis3Section001AFall2025.pdf**

    1

    HIS 131—Document Analysis #3

    Your Name: ____________________

    Title of Document: The Cherokees Resist Removal, 1830

    (**It is the second document contained in the PDF.**)

    • Due Date: by 1:00 PM on Saturday, September 13, 2025

    • Points: 50

    • Directions: Please read “The Cherokees Resist Removal” and then answer the following

    questions. For questions 3 through 10, please use complete sentences.

    1. When was the document created?

    2. Who created or authored the document? I have provided the answer.

    The author was a representative of the tribe. While it is possible to get a more specific answer,

    the identity of the author is not mentioned in this excerpt.

    3. In your own words, please summarize the document. What is the main claim (or claims)

    presented in the document? What evidence is presented to support the claim(s)?

    2

    4. In the beginning of the document, the author wrote, “We are aware, that some persons

    suppose it will be for our advantage to remove beyond the Mississippi. We think otherwise. Our

    people universally think otherwise.” Why was it important for the author to include this

    statement in the appeal?

    5. What do you think was the Cherokee’s strongest argument against removal? Please explain

    your rationale.

    6. According to the author, if the Cherokee agreed to relocate beyond the Mississippi, “they

    have nothing to expect hereafter but to be the victims of a future legalized robbery!” What did

    this statement mean?

    7. According to the author, how had the Cherokee been described by others? Conversely, how

    did the author respond to such descriptions?

    3

    8. Who was the intended audience for the document at the time it was written?

    9. Why was this appeal written? What was the motive?

    10. What did Indian Removal highlight about governmental attitudes toward Native Americans?

    • Based, in part, on the “Written Document Analysis Worksheet” created by the Education Staff, National Archives and Records

    Administration.

    **Cherokees-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cherokees-1-pdf)

    **Cherokees-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cherokees-1-pdf)

    **## HIS131–DocumentAnalysis3Section001AFall2025.pdf**

    1

    HIS 131—Document Analysis #3

    Your Name: ____________________

    Title of Document: The Cherokees Resist Removal, 1830

    (**It is the second document contained in the PDF.**)

    • Due Date: by 1:00 PM on Saturday, September 13, 2025

    • Points: 50

    • Directions: Please read “The Cherokees Resist Removal” and then answer the following

    questions. For questions 3 through 10, please use complete sentences.

    1. When was the document created?

    2. Who created or authored the document? I have provided the answer.

    The author was a representative of the tribe. While it is possible to get a more specific answer,

    the identity of the author is not mentioned in this excerpt.

    3. In your own words, please summarize the document. What is the main claim (or claims)

    presented in the document? What evidence is presented to support the claim(s)?

    2

    4. In the beginning of the document, the author wrote, “We are aware, that some persons

    suppose it will be for our advantage to remove beyond the Mississippi. We think otherwise. Our

    people universally think otherwise.” Why was it important for the author to include this

    statement in the appeal?

    5. What do you think was the Cherokee’s strongest argument against removal? Please explain

    your rationale.

    6. According to the author, if the Cherokee agreed to relocate beyond the Mississippi, “they

    have nothing to expect hereafter but to be the victims of a future legalized robbery!” What did

    this statement mean?

    7. According to the author, how had the Cherokee been described by others? Conversely, how

    did the author respond to such descriptions?

    3

    8. Who was the intended audience for the document at the time it was written?

    9. Why was this appeal written? What was the motive?

    10. What did Indian Removal highlight about governmental attitudes toward Native Americans?

    • Based, in part, on the “Written Document Analysis Worksheet” created by the Education Staff, National Archives and Records

    Administration.

    **Cherokees-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cherokees-1-pdf)

    **## HIS131–DocumentAnalysis3Section001AFall2025.pdf**

    1

    HIS 131—Document Analysis #3

    Your Name: ____________________

    Title of Document: The Cherokees Resist Removal, 1830

    (**It is the second document contained in the PDF.**)

    • Due Date: by 1:00 PM on Saturday, September 13, 2025

    • Points: 50

    • Directions: Please read “The Cherokees Resist Removal” and then answer the following

    questions. For questions 3 through 10, please use complete sentences.

    1. When was the document created?

    2. Who created or authored the document? I have provided the answer.

    The author was a representative of the tribe. While it is possible to get a more specific answer,

    the identity of the author is not mentioned in this excerpt.

    3. In your own words, please summarize the document. What is the main claim (or claims)

    presented in the document? What evidence is presented to support the claim(s)?

    2

    4. In the beginning of the document, the author wrote, “We are aware, that some persons

    suppose it will be for our advantage to remove beyond the Mississippi. We think otherwise. Our

    people universally think otherwise.” Why was it important for the author to include this

    statement in the appeal?

    5. What do you think was the Cherokee’s strongest argument against removal? Please explain

    your rationale.

    6. According to the author, if the Cherokee agreed to relocate beyond the Mississippi, “they

    have nothing to expect hereafter but to be the victims of a future legalized robbery!” What did

    this statement mean?

    7. According to the author, how had the Cherokee been described by others? Conversely, how

    did the author respond to such descriptions?

    3

    8. Who was the intended audience for the document at the time it was written?

    9. Why was this appeal written? What was the motive?

    10. What did Indian Removal highlight about governmental attitudes toward Native Americans?

    • Based, in part, on the “Written Document Analysis Worksheet” created by the Education Staff, National Archives and Records

    Administration.

    **Cherokees-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cherokees-1-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] AW1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering AW1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] c5-ass2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    root cause analysis – ## C5-ASS2.docx – cf_rca_and_safety_improvement_plan1.docx **## C5-ASS2.docx** **Assessment 2** **Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan** [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2470248&conten…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    root cause analysis

    – ## C5-ASS2.docx

    – cf_rca_and_safety_improvement_plan1.docx

    **## C5-ASS2.docx**

    **Assessment 2**

    **Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2470248&content_id=885524) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-resources?module_item_id=2470289&content_id=885524) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/modules/items/2470299) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-attempts?module_item_id=2470307&content_id=885524&attempt_no=1)Attempt 2Attempt 3

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

    For this assessment, you must use the supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be the template, focusing on the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in healthcare settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse's role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other healthcare professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.

    As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.

    **Overview**

    Nursing practice is governed by healthcare policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.

    For this assessment, use the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan.

    **Instructions**

    The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a healthcare setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to
    **the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1**. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen healthcare setting, provide a rationale for your plan.

    Use the
    [Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/files/8790952/download) template to complete the assessment.

    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.

    · Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.

    · Create a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

    · Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.

    · Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Length of submission:** Use the provided template to create a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan. There is no page limit. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.

    ·
    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. Use the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed.

    ·
    **APA formatting:** Format references and citations according to current APA style. See the
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    · Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.

    · Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

    · Analyze the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    · Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

    · Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Analyze the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization. Notes the degree to which various causes contributed to the issue or event.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Basic**

    Identifies the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.**

    **Distinguished**

    Applies evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event. Notes how the strategies will address the issue or event.

    **Proficient**

    Applies evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    **Basic**

    Describes evidence-based and best-practice strategies, but their relevance to the safety issue or sentinel event is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan. Refers explicitly to scholarly or professional resources to support the plan.

    **Proficient**

    Creates a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

    **Basic**

    Creates a safety improvement plan that lacks sufficient evidence or may not be feasible.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not create a safety improvement plan.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.**

    **Distinguished**

    Identifies existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan. Prioritizes resources according to potential impact.

    **Proficient**

    Identifies existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    **Basic**

    Identifies existing organizational resources, but their relevance to the plan is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar and punctuation, and word choice, and is free of spelling errors.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; content contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Content contains errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content for ideas. Content lacks logical flow and smooth transitions.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.**

    **Distinguished**

    Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

    **Proficient**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Basic**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes or paraphrasing.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

    **cf_rca_and_safety_improvement_plan1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-rca-and-safety-improvement-plan1-docx)

    **cf_rca_and_safety_improvement_plan1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-rca-and-safety-improvement-plan1-docx)

    **## C5-ASS2.docx**

    **Assessment 2**

    **Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2470248&content_id=885524) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-resources?module_item_id=2470289&content_id=885524) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/modules/items/2470299) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-attempts?module_item_id=2470307&content_id=885524&attempt_no=1)Attempt 2Attempt 3

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

    For this assessment, you must use the supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be the template, focusing on the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in healthcare settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse's role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other healthcare professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.

    As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.

    **Overview**

    Nursing practice is governed by healthcare policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.

    For this assessment, use the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan.

    **Instructions**

    The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a healthcare setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to
    **the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1**. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen healthcare setting, provide a rationale for your plan.

    Use the
    [Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/files/8790952/download) template to complete the assessment.

    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.

    · Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.

    · Create a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

    · Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.

    · Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Length of submission:** Use the provided template to create a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan. There is no page limit. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.

    ·
    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. Use the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed.

    ·
    **APA formatting:** Format references and citations according to current APA style. See the
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    · Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.

    · Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

    · Analyze the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    · Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

    · Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Analyze the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization. Notes the degree to which various causes contributed to the issue or event.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Basic**

    Identifies the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.**

    **Distinguished**

    Applies evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event. Notes how the strategies will address the issue or event.

    **Proficient**

    Applies evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    **Basic**

    Describes evidence-based and best-practice strategies, but their relevance to the safety issue or sentinel event is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan. Refers explicitly to scholarly or professional resources to support the plan.

    **Proficient**

    Creates a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

    **Basic**

    Creates a safety improvement plan that lacks sufficient evidence or may not be feasible.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not create a safety improvement plan.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.**

    **Distinguished**

    Identifies existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan. Prioritizes resources according to potential impact.

    **Proficient**

    Identifies existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    **Basic**

    Identifies existing organizational resources, but their relevance to the plan is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar and punctuation, and word choice, and is free of spelling errors.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; content contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Content contains errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content for ideas. Content lacks logical flow and smooth transitions.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.**

    **Distinguished**

    Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

    **Proficient**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Basic**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes or paraphrasing.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

    **cf_rca_and_safety_improvement_plan1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-rca-and-safety-improvement-plan1-docx)

    **## C5-ASS2.docx**

    **Assessment 2**

    **Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2470248&content_id=885524) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-resources?module_item_id=2470289&content_id=885524) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/modules/items/2470299) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-2-attempts?module_item_id=2470307&content_id=885524&attempt_no=1)Attempt 2Attempt 3

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

    For this assessment, you must use the supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be the template, focusing on the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in healthcare settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse's role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other healthcare professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.

    As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.

    **Overview**

    Nursing practice is governed by healthcare policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.

    For this assessment, use the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan.

    **Instructions**

    The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a healthcare setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to
    **the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1**. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen healthcare setting, provide a rationale for your plan.

    Use the
    [Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan [DOCX]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/files/8790952/download) template to complete the assessment.

    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.

    · Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.

    · Create a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

    · Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.

    · Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Length of submission:** Use the provided template to create a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan. There is no page limit. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.

    ·
    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. Use the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed.

    ·
    **APA formatting:** Format references and citations according to current APA style. See the
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    · Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.

    · Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

    · Analyze the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    · Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

    · Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Analyze the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.**

    **Distinguished**

    Analyzes the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization. Notes the degree to which various causes contributed to the issue or event.

    **Proficient**

    Analyzes the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Basic**

    Identifies the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.**

    **Distinguished**

    Applies evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event. Notes how the strategies will address the issue or event.

    **Proficient**

    Applies evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    **Basic**

    Describes evidence-based and best-practice strategies, but their relevance to the safety issue or sentinel event is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan. Refers explicitly to scholarly or professional resources to support the plan.

    **Proficient**

    Creates a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

    **Basic**

    Creates a safety improvement plan that lacks sufficient evidence or may not be feasible.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not create a safety improvement plan.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.**

    **Distinguished**

    Identifies existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan. Prioritizes resources according to potential impact.

    **Proficient**

    Identifies existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    **Basic**

    Identifies existing organizational resources, but their relevance to the plan is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar and punctuation, and word choice, and is free of spelling errors.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; content contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Content contains errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content for ideas. Content lacks logical flow and smooth transitions.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.**

    **Distinguished**

    Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

    **Proficient**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Basic**

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes or paraphrasing.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

    **cf_rca_and_safety_improvement_plan1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cf-rca-and-safety-improvement-plan1-docx)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Psychology week assignment 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please help with week 3 assignment. – ## assigment3.docx **## assigment3.docx** For your dissertation or capstone project, you will strictly use scientific, peer-reviewed literature to investigate your topic and inform your research. But how will you know if your source is legitimate or appropriate …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please help with week 3 assignment.

    – ## assigment3.docx

    **## assigment3.docx**

    For your dissertation or capstone project, you will strictly use scientific, peer-reviewed literature to investigate your topic and inform your research. But how will you know if your source is legitimate or appropriate to inform your research? Claims makers can move from popular media, such as newspapers, magazines, and emerging media platforms, and enter scientific literature to shift a social condition to a problem and bring it to the public’s attention.

    As a scholar-practitioner, you will need to understand the differences between popular media and scientific literature and determine how to investigate the evidence to make a judgement about the claim or result. This will be a critical skill that can help position you as a thought leader in your field.

    For this Assignment, you will use the social problem you identified in Week 2 and build on your knowledge of claims makers by comparing how the problem is depicted in empirical and non-empirical sources.

    To Prepare

    Conduct a search in Walden Library for at least two empirical sources.  You can use sources from previous weeks. Your sources should cover the same topic area within your selected social problem.

    Conduct a search in Walden Library for at least two newspaper articles.  You can also use news segments from news programs. These sources should reflect the same topic area as your empirical so submit a 1- to 2-page paper that addresses the following:

    · Using the empirical literature (not the newspaper articles or the news program), explain how the authors/researchers define the nature and scope of your selected social problem. Be sure to cite specific passages from your sources.

    · Using the newspaper articles and/or news segments you researched, identify the
    **_inside claims makers_**. Describe how they provide credibility and legitimacy.  Be sure to cite specific passages from your sources.

    · Compare the evidence provided in the empirical literature with the evidence provided in the newspaper articles or news program segments. How does the evidence support the definition of the social problem?

    · When is it appropriate to use nonempirical sources, such as newspaper articles or news segments, in your research? How do you judge the legitimacy of these sources?

    **## assigment3.docx**

    For your dissertation or capstone project, you will strictly use scientific, peer-reviewed literature to investigate your topic and inform your research. But how will you know if your source is legitimate or appropriate to inform your research? Claims makers can move from popular media, such as newspapers, magazines, and emerging media platforms, and enter scientific literature to shift a social condition to a problem and bring it to the public’s attention.

    As a scholar-practitioner, you will need to understand the differences between popular media and scientific literature and determine how to investigate the evidence to make a judgement about the claim or result. This will be a critical skill that can help position you as a thought leader in your field.

    For this Assignment, you will use the social problem you identified in Week 2 and build on your knowledge of claims makers by comparing how the problem is depicted in empirical and non-empirical sources.

    To Prepare

    Conduct a search in Walden Library for at least two empirical sources.  You can use sources from previous weeks. Your sources should cover the same topic area within your selected social problem.

    Conduct a search in Walden Library for at least two newspaper articles.  You can also use news segments from news programs. These sources should reflect the same topic area as your empirical so submit a 1- to 2-page paper that addresses the following:

    · Using the empirical literature (not the newspaper articles or the news program), explain how the authors/researchers define the nature and scope of your selected social problem. Be sure to cite specific passages from your sources.

    · Using the newspaper articles and/or news segments you researched, identify the
    **_inside claims makers_**. Describe how they provide credibility and legitimacy.  Be sure to cite specific passages from your sources.

    · Compare the evidence provided in the empirical literature with the evidence provided in the newspaper articles or news program segments. How does the evidence support the definition of the social problem?

    · When is it appropriate to use nonempirical sources, such as newspaper articles or news segments, in your research? How do you judge the legitimacy of these sources?

  • [Solved] c5-ass3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    POWER POINT – ## c5-ass3.docx **## c5-ass3.docx** **Assessment 3** **Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation** [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2470335&content_id=885538) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    POWER POINT

    – ## c5-ass3.docx

    **## c5-ass3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2470335&content_id=885538) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2470372&content_id=885538) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/modules/items/2470382) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-3-attempts?module_item_id=2470393&content_id=885538&attempt_no=1)Attempt 2Attempt 3

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

    For this assessment, you will develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker's notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the improvement plan you developed in Assessment 2.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    As a practicing professional, you are likely to present educational in-services or training to staff pertaining to quality improvement (QI) measures of safety improvement interventions. Such in-services and training sessions should be presented in a creative and innovative manner to hold the audience’s attention and promote knowledge acquisition and skill application that changes practice for the better. The teaching sessions may include a presentation, audience participation via simulation or other interactive strategy, audiovisual media, and participant learning evaluation.

    The use of in-services and/or training sessions has positive implications for nursing practice by increasing staff confidence when providing care to specific patient populations. It also allows for a safe and nonthreatening environment where staff nurses can practice their skills prior to a real patient event. Participation in learning sessions fosters a team approach, collaboration, patient safety, and greater patient satisfaction rates in the healthcare environment (Patel & Wright, 2018).

    As you prepare to complete the assessment, consider the impact of in-service training on patient outcomes as well as practice outcomes for staff nurses. Be sure to support your thoughts on the effectiveness of educating and training staff to increase the quality of care provided to patients by examining the literature and established best practices.

    You are encouraged to explore the AONL (American Organization of Nursing Leadership) Nurse Executive Competencies Review activity before you develop the Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation. This activity will help you review your understanding of the AONL Nurse Executive Competencies—especially those related to competencies relevant to developing an effective training session and presentation. This is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates your engagement in the course.

    **Reference**

    Patel, S., & Wright, M. (2018). Development of interprofessional simulation in nursing education to improve teamwork and collaboration in maternal child nursing.
    _Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 47_(3), s16–s17.

    **Overview**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will often find yourself in a position to lead and educate other nurses. This colleague-to-colleague education can take many forms, from mentoring to informal explanations on best practices to formal in-service training. In-services are an effective way to train a large group. Preparing to run an in-service may be daunting, as the facilitator must develop their message around the topic while designing activities to help the target audience learn and practice. By improving understanding and competence around designing and delivering in-service training, a BSN practitioner can demonstrate leadership and prove to be a valuable resource to others.

    For this assessment,
    **build on the work that you have done in your first two assessments** and create an agenda and PowerPoint of an educational in-service session that would help a specific staff audience learn, provide feedback, and understand their roles and practice new skills
    **related to the safety improvement plan you created**.

    **Instructions**

    Develop a PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker's notes representing the material you would deliver at a one-hour in-service session to raise awareness of your chosen safety improvement initiative and explain the need for it. Additionally, you must educate the audience as to their role and importance to the success of the initiative. This includes providing examples and practice opportunities to test out new ideas or practices related to the safety improvement initiative.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so that you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session for nurses.

    · Include a one-line purpose statement followed by the goals.

    · Start each goal with a verb, such as 1) Explain reasons for medication administration errors, 2) Discuss the importance of preventing medication errors, and 3) Describe strategies to prevent medication errors.

    · Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient-safety issue.

    · Explain to the audience their role and the importance of making the improvement plan successful.

    · Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.

    · Create a resource slide OR do an activity with the audience to assist them in learning and applying a new skill. A resource slide could consist of in-house materials, posters, or credible websites. An activity slide may include a quiz, simulation, group work, a case study, and so forth.

    · Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.

    There are various ways to structure an in-service session; below is just one example:

    ·
    **Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes.**

    · Explain to your audience what they are going to learn or do, and what they are expected to take away.

    ·
    **Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan.**

    · Give an overview of the current problem, the proposed plan, and what the improvement plan is trying to address.

    · Explain why it is important for the organization to address the current situation.

    ·
    **Part 3: Audience’s Role and Importance.**

    · Discuss how the staff audience will be expected to help implement and drive the improvement plan.

    · Explain why they are critical to the success of the improvement plan.

    · Describe how their work could benefit from embracing their role in the plan.

    ·
    **Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice.**

    · Explain new processes or skills.

    · Develop an activity that allows the staff audience to practice and ask questions about these.

    · In the notes section, brainstorm potential responses to likely questions or concerns.

    ·
    **Part 5: Soliciting Feedback.**

    · Describe how you would solicit feedback from the audience on the improvement plan and the in-service.

    · Explain how you might integrate this feedback for future improvements.

    Remember to account for activity and discussion time.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Presentation length:** There is no required length; use just enough slides to address all the necessary elements. Remember to use short, concise bullet points on the slides and expand on your points in the speaker's notes. If you use 2 or 3 slides to address each of the parts in the above example, your presentation would be at least 10 slides and no more than 15 slides (not including the title, conclusion, or references slide).

    · For PowerPoint help, see
    [Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639) and the
    [Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations](http://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint).

    ·
    **Speaker notes**: Speaker notes (located under each slide) should reflect what you would actually say if you were delivering the presentation to an audience. This presentation does NOT require audio or a transcript. Another presenter would be able to use the presentation by following the speaker's notes.

    ·
    **APA format:** Use APA formatting for in-text citations. Include an APA-formatted reference slide at the end of your presentation. See
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    ·
    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your assertions. Resources should be no more than five years old. Use the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed to guide your research in the Capella library.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.

    · Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.

    · Competency 4: Explain the nurse's role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs.

    · Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.

    · Explain to an audience its role and importance of making an improvement plan successful.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Speaker notes are clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    · Organize content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue, with purpose and goals that are relevant and achievable within the in-service session.

    **Proficient**

    Describes the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Basic**

    Lists incomplete purpose or goals of an in-service session.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue, referring to specific data, evidence, or standards to support explanation, along with citation from a credible source.

    **Proficient**

    Explains the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.

    **Basic**

    Describes a safety outcome and process but the relevance to a specific patient safety issue is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Explain to an audience its role and importance of making an improvement plan successful.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains to an audience its role and the importance of making an improvement plan successful, using persuasive, transparent communication to improve buy-in.

    **Proficient**

    Explains to an audience its role and the importance of making an improvement plan successful.

    **Basic**

    Describes to an audience its role in the improvement plan, but does not clearly address its importance to the success of the improvement plan.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe to an audience its role and the importance of making an improvement plan successful.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improve initiative, explaining their value.

    **Proficient**

    Creates resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improve initiative.

    **Basic**

    Lists resources or activities, but their relevance to developing skills or process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improve initiative.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Speaker notes are clear, organized, and professionally presented.**

    **Distinguished**

    Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide background is visually pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may utilize graphics. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    **Proficient**

    Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    **Basic**

    Slides are easy to read with few editing errors. Speaker notes are sufficient to support the slides.

    **Non Performance**

    Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No speaker notes provided.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Organize content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with clear purpose and goals. PowerPoint slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources that were published within the last five years.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with clear purpose or goals. PowerPoint slides do not consistently support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources that were published within the last five years.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.

    **## c5-ass3.docx**

    **Assessment 3**

    **Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation**

    [**Instructions**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=2470335&content_id=885538) [Resources](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-3-resources?module_item_id=2470372&content_id=885538) [Activity](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/modules/items/2470382) [Attempt 1\
    _available_](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/49097/pages/assessment-3-attempts?module_item_id=2470393&content_id=885538&attempt_no=1)Attempt 2Attempt 3

    InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

    For this assessment, you will develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker's notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the improvement plan you developed in Assessment 2.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    As a practicing professional, you are likely to present educational in-services or training to staff pertaining to quality improvement (QI) measures of safety improvement interventions. Such in-services and training sessions should be presented in a creative and innovative manner to hold the audience’s attention and promote knowledge acquisition and skill application that changes practice for the better. The teaching sessions may include a presentation, audience participation via simulation or other interactive strategy, audiovisual media, and participant learning evaluation.

    The use of in-services and/or training sessions has positive implications for nursing practice by increasing staff confidence when providing care to specific patient populations. It also allows for a safe and nonthreatening environment where staff nurses can practice their skills prior to a real patient event. Participation in learning sessions fosters a team approach, collaboration, patient safety, and greater patient satisfaction rates in the healthcare environment (Patel & Wright, 2018).

    As you prepare to complete the assessment, consider the impact of in-service training on patient outcomes as well as practice outcomes for staff nurses. Be sure to support your thoughts on the effectiveness of educating and training staff to increase the quality of care provided to patients by examining the literature and established best practices.

    You are encouraged to explore the AONL (American Organization of Nursing Leadership) Nurse Executive Competencies Review activity before you develop the Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation. This activity will help you review your understanding of the AONL Nurse Executive Competencies—especially those related to competencies relevant to developing an effective training session and presentation. This is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates your engagement in the course.

    **Reference**

    Patel, S., & Wright, M. (2018). Development of interprofessional simulation in nursing education to improve teamwork and collaboration in maternal child nursing.
    _Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 47_(3), s16–s17.

    **Overview**

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will often find yourself in a position to lead and educate other nurses. This colleague-to-colleague education can take many forms, from mentoring to informal explanations on best practices to formal in-service training. In-services are an effective way to train a large group. Preparing to run an in-service may be daunting, as the facilitator must develop their message around the topic while designing activities to help the target audience learn and practice. By improving understanding and competence around designing and delivering in-service training, a BSN practitioner can demonstrate leadership and prove to be a valuable resource to others.

    For this assessment,
    **build on the work that you have done in your first two assessments** and create an agenda and PowerPoint of an educational in-service session that would help a specific staff audience learn, provide feedback, and understand their roles and practice new skills
    **related to the safety improvement plan you created**.

    **Instructions**

    Develop a PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker's notes representing the material you would deliver at a one-hour in-service session to raise awareness of your chosen safety improvement initiative and explain the need for it. Additionally, you must educate the audience as to their role and importance to the success of the initiative. This includes providing examples and practice opportunities to test out new ideas or practices related to the safety improvement initiative.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so that you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session for nurses.

    · Include a one-line purpose statement followed by the goals.

    · Start each goal with a verb, such as 1) Explain reasons for medication administration errors, 2) Discuss the importance of preventing medication errors, and 3) Describe strategies to prevent medication errors.

    · Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient-safety issue.

    · Explain to the audience their role and the importance of making the improvement plan successful.

    · Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.

    · Create a resource slide OR do an activity with the audience to assist them in learning and applying a new skill. A resource slide could consist of in-house materials, posters, or credible websites. An activity slide may include a quiz, simulation, group work, a case study, and so forth.

    · Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.

    There are various ways to structure an in-service session; below is just one example:

    ·
    **Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes.**

    · Explain to your audience what they are going to learn or do, and what they are expected to take away.

    ·
    **Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan.**

    · Give an overview of the current problem, the proposed plan, and what the improvement plan is trying to address.

    · Explain why it is important for the organization to address the current situation.

    ·
    **Part 3: Audience’s Role and Importance.**

    · Discuss how the staff audience will be expected to help implement and drive the improvement plan.

    · Explain why they are critical to the success of the improvement plan.

    · Describe how their work could benefit from embracing their role in the plan.

    ·
    **Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice.**

    · Explain new processes or skills.

    · Develop an activity that allows the staff audience to practice and ask questions about these.

    · In the notes section, brainstorm potential responses to likely questions or concerns.

    ·
    **Part 5: Soliciting Feedback.**

    · Describe how you would solicit feedback from the audience on the improvement plan and the in-service.

    · Explain how you might integrate this feedback for future improvements.

    Remember to account for activity and discussion time.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Presentation length:** There is no required length; use just enough slides to address all the necessary elements. Remember to use short, concise bullet points on the slides and expand on your points in the speaker's notes. If you use 2 or 3 slides to address each of the parts in the above example, your presentation would be at least 10 slides and no more than 15 slides (not including the title, conclusion, or references slide).

    · For PowerPoint help, see
    [Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639) and the
    [Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations](http://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint).

    ·
    **Speaker notes**: Speaker notes (located under each slide) should reflect what you would actually say if you were delivering the presentation to an audience. This presentation does NOT require audio or a transcript. Another presenter would be able to use the presentation by following the speaker's notes.

    ·
    **APA format:** Use APA formatting for in-text citations. Include an APA-formatted reference slide at the end of your presentation. See
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    ·
    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your assertions. Resources should be no more than five years old. Use the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed to guide your research in the Capella library.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.

    · Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.

    · Competency 4: Explain the nurse's role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs.

    · Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.

    · Explain to an audience its role and importance of making an improvement plan successful.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Speaker notes are clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    · Organize content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Describes the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue, with purpose and goals that are relevant and achievable within the in-service session.

    **Proficient**

    Describes the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Basic**

    Lists incomplete purpose or goals of an in-service session.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session on a specific patient safety issue.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue, referring to specific data, evidence, or standards to support explanation, along with citation from a credible source.

    **Proficient**

    Explains the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.

    **Basic**

    Describes a safety outcome and process but the relevance to a specific patient safety issue is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Explain to an audience its role and importance of making an improvement plan successful.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains to an audience its role and the importance of making an improvement plan successful, using persuasive, transparent communication to improve buy-in.

    **Proficient**

    Explains to an audience its role and the importance of making an improvement plan successful.

    **Basic**

    Describes to an audience its role in the improvement plan, but does not clearly address its importance to the success of the improvement plan.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not describe to an audience its role and the importance of making an improvement plan successful.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.**

    **Distinguished**

    Creates resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improve initiative, explaining their value.

    **Proficient**

    Creates resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improve initiative.

    **Basic**

    Lists resources or activities, but their relevance to developing skills or process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative is unclear.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improve initiative.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Speaker notes are clear, organized, and professionally presented.**

    **Distinguished**

    Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide background is visually pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may utilize graphics. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    **Proficient**

    Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    **Basic**

    Slides are easy to read with few editing errors. Speaker notes are sufficient to support the slides.

    **Non Performance**

    Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No speaker notes provided.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Organize content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content with clear purpose and goals. PowerPoint slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources that were published within the last five years.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with clear purpose or goals. PowerPoint slides do not consistently support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources that were published within the last five years.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content with clear purpose and goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources published within the last five years.

  • [Solved] AWVideo1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering AWVideo1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Disucssion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Disucssion Post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Can someone help me with this \ img09162025_0001.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img09162025-0001-pdf "img09162025_0001.pdf")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Can someone help me with this
    \
    img09162025_0001.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img09162025-0001-pdf "img09162025_0001.pdf")