Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– ## UnderstandingCriminalLaw_Functions.docx
– IMG_2542.png
**## UnderstandingCriminalLaw_Functions.docx**
## Understanding Criminal Law
**Sources of Criminal Law**
The primary function of the substantive criminal law is to define crimes, including the associated punishment. The procedural criminal law sets the procedures for arrests, searches and seizures, and interrogations. In addition, it establishes the rules for conducting trials. Where does criminal law come from?
**The Common Law**
The term common law can be disturbingly vague for the student. That is because different sources use it in several different ways with subtle differences in meaning. The best way to get a grasp on the term’s meaning is to understand a little of the history of the American legal system. Common law, which some sources refer to as “judge-made” law, first appeared when judges decided cases based on the legal customs of medieval England at the time. It may be hard for us to imagine today, but in the early days of English common law, the law was a matter of oral tradition. That is, the definitions of crimes and associated punishments were not written down in a way that gave them binding authority.
By the end of the medieval period, some of these cases were recorded in written form. Over a period, imported judicial decisions became recorded on a regular basis and collected into books called reporters. The English-speaking world is forever indebted to Sir William Blackstone, an English legal scholar, for collecting much of the common law tradition of England and committing it to paper in an organized way. His four-volume set, Commentaries on the Laws of England, was taken to the colonies by the founding fathers. The founding fathers incorporated the common law of England into the laws of the Colonies, and ultimately into the laws of the United States.
In modern America, most crimes are defined by statute. These statutory definitions use ideas and terms that come from the common law tradition. When judges take on the task of interpreting a statute, they still use common law principles for guidance. The definitions of many crimes, such as murder and arson, have not deviated much from their common law origin. Other crimes, such as rape, have seen sweeping changes.
One of the primary characteristics of the common law tradition is the importance of precedent. Known by the legal Latin phrase stare decisis, the doctrine of precedence means that once a court makes a decision on a particular matter, they are bound to rule the same way in future cases that have the same legal issue. This is important because a consistent ruling in identical factual situations means that everyone gets the same treatment from the courts. In other words, the doctrine of stare decisis ensures equal treatment under the law.
**Constitutions**
When the founding fathers signed the Constitution, they all agreed that it would be the supreme law of the land; the Framers stated this profoundly important agreement in Article VI. After the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Supreme Court has had the power to strike down any law or any government action that violates constitutional principles. This precedent means that any law made by the Congress of the United States or the legislative assembly of any state that does not meet constitutional standards is subject to nullification by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Every state adopted this idea of constitutional supremacy when creating their constitutions. All state laws are subject to review by the high courts of those states. If a state law or government practice (e.g., police, courts, or corrections) violates the constitutional law of that state, then it will be struck down by that state’s high court. Local laws are subject to similar scrutiny.
**Statutory Law**
Statutes are written laws passed by legislative assemblies. Modern criminal laws tend to be a matter of statutory law. In other words, most states and the federal government have moved away from the common-law definitions of crimes and established their own versions through the legislative process. Thus, most of the criminal law today is made by state legislatures, with the federal criminal law being made by Congress. Legislative assemblies tend to consider legislation as it is presented, not in subject order. This chronological ordering makes finding the law concerning a particular matter very difficult. To simplify finding the law, most all statutes are organized by subject in a set of books called a code. The body of statutes that comprises the criminal law is often referred to as the criminal code, or less commonly as the penal code.
**Administrative Law**
The clear distinction between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government becomes blurry when U.S. government agencies and commissions are considered. These types of bureaucratic organizations can be referred to as semi-legislative and semi-judicial in character. These organizations have the power to make rules that have the force of law, the power to investigate violations of those laws, and the power to impose sanctions on those deemed to be in violation. Examples of such agencies are the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). When these agencies make rules that have the force of law, the rules are collectively referred to as administrative law.
**Court Cases**
When the appellate courts decide a legal issue, the doctrine of precedence means that future cases must follow that decision. This means that the holding in an appellate court case has the force of law. Such laws are often referred to as case law. The entire criminal justice community depends on the appellate courts, especially the Supreme Court, to evaluate and clarify both statutory laws and government practices against the requirements of the Constitution. These legal rules are all set down in court cases.
**Substantive Criminal Law**
As previously discussed, the criminal law in its broadest sense encompasses both the substantive criminal law and criminal procedure. In a more limited sense, the term criminal law is used to denote the substantive criminal law, and criminal procedure is considered another category of law. (Most college criminal justice programs organize classes this way). Recall that the substantive law defines criminal acts that the legislature wishes to prohibit and specifies penalties for those that commit the prohibited acts. For example, murder is a substantive law because it prohibits the killing of another human being without justification.
**No Crime without Law**
It is fundamental to the American way of life that there can be no crime without law. This concept defines the idea of the Rule of Law. The rule of law is the principle that the law should govern a nation, not an individual. The importance of the rule of law in America stems from the colonial experience with the English monarchy. It follows that, in America, no one is above the law.
**Constitutional Limits**
Unlike the governments of other countries, the legislative assemblies of the United States do not have unlimited power. The power of Congress to enact criminal laws is circumscribed by the Constitution. These limits apply to state legislatures as well.
Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto Laws. A bill of attainder is an enactment by a legislature that declares a person (or a group of people) guilty of a crime and subject to punishment for committing that crime without the benefit of a trial. An ex post facto law is a law that makes an act done before the legislature enacted the law criminal and punishes that act. The prohibition also forbids the legislature from making the penalty for a crime more severe retroactively. Both of these types of laws are strictly prohibited by the Constitution.
Fair Notice and Vagueness. The due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments mandate that the criminal law afford fair notice. The idea of fair notice is that people must be able to determine exactly what is prohibited by the law, so vague and ambiguous laws are prohibited. If a law is determined to be unclear by the Supreme Court, it will be struck down and declared void for vagueness. Such laws would allow for arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement if allowed to stand.
1. What are the primary functions of substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law?
2. What does the concept of equal treatment under the law mean?
3. What is the significance of the Supreme Court's power to strike down laws that violate the Constitution?
4. How are statutes organized and compiled to make it easier to find the relevant criminal laws?
5. What is the role of administrative agencies in creating and enforcing laws, and what is this type of law referred to?
6. How do appellate court decisions establish binding legal precedents, and what is this type of law called?
7. What is the overall importance of the various sources of criminal law in the American legal system?
8.
What is the difference between substantive criminal law and criminal procedure?
9. What is the fundamental principle underlying the American criminal justice system?
10. What is the rationale behind the constitutional requirement of fair notice in criminal laws?
11. Why are vague and ambiguous criminal laws prohibited under the due process clause?
12. What is the potential consequence if vague criminal laws were allowed to stand?
**IMG_2542.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2542-png)
**IMG_2542.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2542-png)
**## UnderstandingCriminalLaw_Functions.docx**
## Understanding Criminal Law
**Sources of Criminal Law**
The primary function of the substantive criminal law is to define crimes, including the associated punishment. The procedural criminal law sets the procedures for arrests, searches and seizures, and interrogations. In addition, it establishes the rules for conducting trials. Where does criminal law come from?
**The Common Law**
The term common law can be disturbingly vague for the student. That is because different sources use it in several different ways with subtle differences in meaning. The best way to get a grasp on the term’s meaning is to understand a little of the history of the American legal system. Common law, which some sources refer to as “judge-made” law, first appeared when judges decided cases based on the legal customs of medieval England at the time. It may be hard for us to imagine today, but in the early days of English common law, the law was a matter of oral tradition. That is, the definitions of crimes and associated punishments were not written down in a way that gave them binding authority.
By the end of the medieval period, some of these cases were recorded in written form. Over a period, imported judicial decisions became recorded on a regular basis and collected into books called reporters. The English-speaking world is forever indebted to Sir William Blackstone, an English legal scholar, for collecting much of the common law tradition of England and committing it to paper in an organized way. His four-volume set, Commentaries on the Laws of England, was taken to the colonies by the founding fathers. The founding fathers incorporated the common law of England into the laws of the Colonies, and ultimately into the laws of the United States.
In modern America, most crimes are defined by statute. These statutory definitions use ideas and terms that come from the common law tradition. When judges take on the task of interpreting a statute, they still use common law principles for guidance. The definitions of many crimes, such as murder and arson, have not deviated much from their common law origin. Other crimes, such as rape, have seen sweeping changes.
One of the primary characteristics of the common law tradition is the importance of precedent. Known by the legal Latin phrase stare decisis, the doctrine of precedence means that once a court makes a decision on a particular matter, they are bound to rule the same way in future cases that have the same legal issue. This is important because a consistent ruling in identical factual situations means that everyone gets the same treatment from the courts. In other words, the doctrine of stare decisis ensures equal treatment under the law.
**Constitutions**
When the founding fathers signed the Constitution, they all agreed that it would be the supreme law of the land; the Framers stated this profoundly important agreement in Article VI. After the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Supreme Court has had the power to strike down any law or any government action that violates constitutional principles. This precedent means that any law made by the Congress of the United States or the legislative assembly of any state that does not meet constitutional standards is subject to nullification by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Every state adopted this idea of constitutional supremacy when creating their constitutions. All state laws are subject to review by the high courts of those states. If a state law or government practice (e.g., police, courts, or corrections) violates the constitutional law of that state, then it will be struck down by that state’s high court. Local laws are subject to similar scrutiny.
**Statutory Law**
Statutes are written laws passed by legislative assemblies. Modern criminal laws tend to be a matter of statutory law. In other words, most states and the federal government have moved away from the common-law definitions of crimes and established their own versions through the legislative process. Thus, most of the criminal law today is made by state legislatures, with the federal criminal law being made by Congress. Legislative assemblies tend to consider legislation as it is presented, not in subject order. This chronological ordering makes finding the law concerning a particular matter very difficult. To simplify finding the law, most all statutes are organized by subject in a set of books called a code. The body of statutes that comprises the criminal law is often referred to as the criminal code, or less commonly as the penal code.
**Administrative Law**
The clear distinction between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government becomes blurry when U.S. government agencies and commissions are considered. These types of bureaucratic organizations can be referred to as semi-legislative and semi-judicial in character. These organizations have the power to make rules that have the force of law, the power to investigate violations of those laws, and the power to impose sanctions on those deemed to be in violation. Examples of such agencies are the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). When these agencies make rules that have the force of law, the rules are collectively referred to as administrative law.
**Court Cases**
When the appellate courts decide a legal issue, the doctrine of precedence means that future cases must follow that decision. This means that the holding in an appellate court case has the force of law. Such laws are often referred to as case law. The entire criminal justice community depends on the appellate courts, especially the Supreme Court, to evaluate and clarify both statutory laws and government practices against the requirements of the Constitution. These legal rules are all set down in court cases.
**Substantive Criminal Law**
As previously discussed, the criminal law in its broadest sense encompasses both the substantive criminal law and criminal procedure. In a more limited sense, the term criminal law is used to denote the substantive criminal law, and criminal procedure is considered another category of law. (Most college criminal justice programs organize classes this way). Recall that the substantive law defines criminal acts that the legislature wishes to prohibit and specifies penalties for those that commit the prohibited acts. For example, murder is a substantive law because it prohibits the killing of another human being without justification.
**No Crime without Law**
It is fundamental to the American way of life that there can be no crime without law. This concept defines the idea of the Rule of Law. The rule of law is the principle that the law should govern a nation, not an individual. The importance of the rule of law in America stems from the colonial experience with the English monarchy. It follows that, in America, no one is above the law.
**Constitutional Limits**
Unlike the governments of other countries, the legislative assemblies of the United States do not have unlimited power. The power of Congress to enact criminal laws is circumscribed by the Constitution. These limits apply to state legislatures as well.
Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto Laws. A bill of attainder is an enactment by a legislature that declares a person (or a group of people) guilty of a crime and subject to punishment for committing that crime without the benefit of a trial. An ex post facto law is a law that makes an act done before the legislature enacted the law criminal and punishes that act. The prohibition also forbids the legislature from making the penalty for a crime more severe retroactively. Both of these types of laws are strictly prohibited by the Constitution.
Fair Notice and Vagueness. The due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments mandate that the criminal law afford fair notice. The idea of fair notice is that people must be able to determine exactly what is prohibited by the law, so vague and ambiguous laws are prohibited. If a law is determined to be unclear by the Supreme Court, it will be struck down and declared void for vagueness. Such laws would allow for arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement if allowed to stand.
1. What are the primary functions of substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law?
2. What does the concept of equal treatment under the law mean?
3. What is the significance of the Supreme Court's power to strike down laws that violate the Constitution?
4. How are statutes organized and compiled to make it easier to find the relevant criminal laws?
5. What is the role of administrative agencies in creating and enforcing laws, and what is this type of law referred to?
6. How do appellate court decisions establish binding legal precedents, and what is this type of law called?
7. What is the overall importance of the various sources of criminal law in the American legal system?
8.
What is the difference between substantive criminal law and criminal procedure?
9. What is the fundamental principle underlying the American criminal justice system?
10. What is the rationale behind the constitutional requirement of fair notice in criminal laws?
11. Why are vague and ambiguous criminal laws prohibited under the due process clause?
12. What is the potential consequence if vague criminal laws were allowed to stand?
**IMG_2542.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2542-png)
**## UnderstandingCriminalLaw_Functions.docx**
## Understanding Criminal Law
**Sources of Criminal Law**
The primary function of the substantive criminal law is to define crimes, including the associated punishment. The procedural criminal law sets the procedures for arrests, searches and seizures, and interrogations. In addition, it establishes the rules for conducting trials. Where does criminal law come from?
**The Common Law**
The term common law can be disturbingly vague for the student. That is because different sources use it in several different ways with subtle differences in meaning. The best way to get a grasp on the term’s meaning is to understand a little of the history of the American legal system. Common law, which some sources refer to as “judge-made” law, first appeared when judges decided cases based on the legal customs of medieval England at the time. It may be hard for us to imagine today, but in the early days of English common law, the law was a matter of oral tradition. That is, the definitions of crimes and associated punishments were not written down in a way that gave them binding authority.
By the end of the medieval period, some of these cases were recorded in written form. Over a period, imported judicial decisions became recorded on a regular basis and collected into books called reporters. The English-speaking world is forever indebted to Sir William Blackstone, an English legal scholar, for collecting much of the common law tradition of England and committing it to paper in an organized way. His four-volume set, Commentaries on the Laws of England, was taken to the colonies by the founding fathers. The founding fathers incorporated the common law of England into the laws of the Colonies, and ultimately into the laws of the United States.
In modern America, most crimes are defined by statute. These statutory definitions use ideas and terms that come from the common law tradition. When judges take on the task of interpreting a statute, they still use common law principles for guidance. The definitions of many crimes, such as murder and arson, have not deviated much from their common law origin. Other crimes, such as rape, have seen sweeping changes.
One of the primary characteristics of the common law tradition is the importance of precedent. Known by the legal Latin phrase stare decisis, the doctrine of precedence means that once a court makes a decision on a particular matter, they are bound to rule the same way in future cases that have the same legal issue. This is important because a consistent ruling in identical factual situations means that everyone gets the same treatment from the courts. In other words, the doctrine of stare decisis ensures equal treatment under the law.
**Constitutions**
When the founding fathers signed the Constitution, they all agreed that it would be the supreme law of the land; the Framers stated this profoundly important agreement in Article VI. After the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Supreme Court has had the power to strike down any law or any government action that violates constitutional principles. This precedent means that any law made by the Congress of the United States or the legislative assembly of any state that does not meet constitutional standards is subject to nullification by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Every state adopted this idea of constitutional supremacy when creating their constitutions. All state laws are subject to review by the high courts of those states. If a state law or government practice (e.g., police, courts, or corrections) violates the constitutional law of that state, then it will be struck down by that state’s high court. Local laws are subject to similar scrutiny.
**Statutory Law**
Statutes are written laws passed by legislative assemblies. Modern criminal laws tend to be a matter of statutory law. In other words, most states and the federal government have moved away from the common-law definitions of crimes and established their own versions through the legislative process. Thus, most of the criminal law today is made by state legislatures, with the federal criminal law being made by Congress. Legislative assemblies tend to consider legislation as it is presented, not in subject order. This chronological ordering makes finding the law concerning a particular matter very difficult. To simplify finding the law, most all statutes are organized by subject in a set of books called a code. The body of statutes that comprises the criminal law is often referred to as the criminal code, or less commonly as the penal code.
**Administrative Law**
The clear distinction between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government becomes blurry when U.S. government agencies and commissions are considered. These types of bureaucratic organizations can be referred to as semi-legislative and semi-judicial in character. These organizations have the power to make rules that have the force of law, the power to investigate violations of those laws, and the power to impose sanctions on those deemed to be in violation. Examples of such agencies are the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). When these agencies make rules that have the force of law, the rules are collectively referred to as administrative law.
**Court Cases**
When the appellate courts decide a legal issue, the doctrine of precedence means that future cases must follow that decision. This means that the holding in an appellate court case has the force of law. Such laws are often referred to as case law. The entire criminal justice community depends on the appellate courts, especially the Supreme Court, to evaluate and clarify both statutory laws and government practices against the requirements of the Constitution. These legal rules are all set down in court cases.
**Substantive Criminal Law**
As previously discussed, the criminal law in its broadest sense encompasses both the substantive criminal law and criminal procedure. In a more limited sense, the term criminal law is used to denote the substantive criminal law, and criminal procedure is considered another category of law. (Most college criminal justice programs organize classes this way). Recall that the substantive law defines criminal acts that the legislature wishes to prohibit and specifies penalties for those that commit the prohibited acts. For example, murder is a substantive law because it prohibits the killing of another human being without justification.
**No Crime without Law**
It is fundamental to the American way of life that there can be no crime without law. This concept defines the idea of the Rule of Law. The rule of law is the principle that the law should govern a nation, not an individual. The importance of the rule of law in America stems from the colonial experience with the English monarchy. It follows that, in America, no one is above the law.
**Constitutional Limits**
Unlike the governments of other countries, the legislative assemblies of the United States do not have unlimited power. The power of Congress to enact criminal laws is circumscribed by the Constitution. These limits apply to state legislatures as well.
Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto Laws. A bill of attainder is an enactment by a legislature that declares a person (or a group of people) guilty of a crime and subject to punishment for committing that crime without the benefit of a trial. An ex post facto law is a law that makes an act done before the legislature enacted the law criminal and punishes that act. The prohibition also forbids the legislature from making the penalty for a crime more severe retroactively. Both of these types of laws are strictly prohibited by the Constitution.
Fair Notice and Vagueness. The due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments mandate that the criminal law afford fair notice. The idea of fair notice is that people must be able to determine exactly what is prohibited by the law, so vague and ambiguous laws are prohibited. If a law is determined to be unclear by the Supreme Court, it will be struck down and declared void for vagueness. Such laws would allow for arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement if allowed to stand.
1. What are the primary functions of substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law?
2. What does the concept of equal treatment under the law mean?
3. What is the significance of the Supreme Court's power to strike down laws that violate the Constitution?
4. How are statutes organized and compiled to make it easier to find the relevant criminal laws?
5. What is the role of administrative agencies in creating and enforcing laws, and what is this type of law referred to?
6. How do appellate court decisions establish binding legal precedents, and what is this type of law called?
7. What is the overall importance of the various sources of criminal law in the American legal system?
8.
What is the difference between substantive criminal law and criminal procedure?
9. What is the fundamental principle underlying the American criminal justice system?
10. What is the rationale behind the constitutional requirement of fair notice in criminal laws?
11. Why are vague and ambiguous criminal laws prohibited under the due process clause?
12. What is the potential consequence if vague criminal laws were allowed to stand?
**IMG_2542.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2542-png)
– 1
– 2