Executive Solution Overview
helpp 2400 word – ## week8summative.pdf **## week8summative.pdf** MGT 6681—Organization Development and Change SUMMATIVE ESSAY This essay is an extension of your previously written Application Essay, which constituted an organization development (OD) diagnosis. In this extension, you will enhance yo…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
helpp 2400 word
– ## week8summative.pdf
**## week8summative.pdf**
MGT 6681—Organization Development and Change
SUMMATIVE ESSAY
This essay is an extension of your previously written Application Essay, which
constituted an organization development (OD) diagnosis. In this extension, you will
enhance your work by inserting an implementation plan and an evaluation plan between
the Issue Diagnosis section and the Discussion. As before, apply your concepts
correctly, as presented in this class rather than how they may appear in other sources.
To convert your Application Essay into your Summative Essay, perform three tasks: (a)
add the implementation plan as described below; (b) add the evaluation plan as
described below; (c) update your abstract and your discussion in light of new
perspectives raised in the process of adding the noted two sections; and (d) reread your
Application Essay in search of opportunities to correct errors, add qualifying sources, or
extend commentary.
Format: APA style (7th edition), double-spaced, Times New Roman 12pt font,
appropriate page formatting.
Review the posted sample APA-styled paper, professional version, with abstract (in the Start Here
module).
Structure: title page, abstract, body, and references (see sample paper), separated by
page breaks.
Review your previously written abstract after updating the paper, then make adjustments as needed to fit
the updated content.
Old & New Content (in the context of the prior content):
Introductory Section. No changes aside from routine corrections considered in
ordinary post-editing.
Strategic Analysis. No changes aside from routine corrections considered in ordinary
post-editing.
Organization Diagnosis. No changes aside from routine corrections considered in
ordinary post-editing.
Issue Diagnosis. No changes aside from routine corrections considered in ordinary
post-editing.
Implementation Plan {new section} [main section header—centered, bold] [~1¾
pages]. Four paragraphs: (a) provide a brief overview of Kotter’s (2017) eight-step
change model, and explain that you will design your implementation plan using that
model (at least two sentences); (b) walk through how you plan to unfreeze the current
state of the process identified for change, via Kotter’s (2017) phases 1–3; (c) walk
through how you plan to move to the new state via Kotter’s (2017) phases 4–5; and (d)
walk through how you plan to freeze the new state via Kotter’s (2017) phases 7 and 8.
This plan will require some imagination. The more familiar you are with your actual organization, the more
easily you can work out the likely scenario at each phase in realistic terms. A good plan is the result of
careful thinking over several iterations.
Evaluation Plan {new section} [main section header—centered, bold] [~1¾ pages].
Four paragraphs: (a) explain what this section will address (at least two sentences); (b)
determine who will collect the data to assess the current and post-intervention states of
the process and why this choice is logical; (c) identify what measures to use, when to
conduct the observations, and why this choice is logical; and (d) identify who will receive
the results and why this choice is logical.
For the measures, think in terms of what the identified process should do. Process specifications entail
dimensional boundaries (e.g., length, mass, durability, suitability) that distinguish success from error, even
if no one has ever stated them in the past.
Discussion. Add mentions of the new content (viz., the implementation plan and the
evaluation plan) to the discussion. Review the full discussion to consider further
adjustments based on the new content. Lastly, be sure to apply the kinds of routine
corrections that are appropriate in ordinary post-editing.
Standards. Minimum length = 2,400 words (body only; see syllabus for length
calculation). Cite at least the textbook plus six qualifying sources based on the criteria
described in the syllabus (purple section).
The length and citation criteria subsume those of the application essay. If you happened to meet the prior
1,400-word criterion and five qualifying articles exactly, then this essay will require 1,000 more words and
one more qualifying article.
**## week8summative.pdf**
MGT 6681—Organization Development and Change
SUMMATIVE ESSAY
This essay is an extension of your previously written Application Essay, which
constituted an organization development (OD) diagnosis. In this extension, you will
enhance your work by inserting an implementation plan and an evaluation plan between
the Issue Diagnosis section and the Discussion. As before, apply your concepts
correctly, as presented in this class rather than how they may appear in other sources.
To convert your Application Essay into your Summative Essay, perform three tasks: (a)
add the implementation plan as described below; (b) add the evaluation plan as
described below; (c) update your abstract and your discussion in light of new
perspectives raised in the process of adding the noted two sections; and (d) reread your
Application Essay in search of opportunities to correct errors, add qualifying sources, or
extend commentary.
Format: APA style (7th edition), double-spaced, Times New Roman 12pt font,
appropriate page formatting.
Review the posted sample APA-styled paper, professional version, with abstract (in the Start Here
module).
Structure: title page, abstract, body, and references (see sample paper), separated by
page breaks.
Review your previously written abstract after updating the paper, then make adjustments as needed to fit
the updated content.
Old & New Content (in the context of the prior content):
Introductory Section. No changes aside from routine corrections considered in
ordinary post-editing.
Strategic Analysis. No changes aside from routine corrections considered in ordinary
post-editing.
Organization Diagnosis. No changes aside from routine corrections considered in
ordinary post-editing.
Issue Diagnosis. No changes aside from routine corrections considered in ordinary
post-editing.
Implementation Plan {new section} [main section header—centered, bold] [~1¾
pages]. Four paragraphs: (a) provide a brief overview of Kotter’s (2017) eight-step
change model, and explain that you will design your implementation plan using that
model (at least two sentences); (b) walk through how you plan to unfreeze the current
state of the process identified for change, via Kotter’s (2017) phases 1–3; (c) walk
through how you plan to move to the new state via Kotter’s (2017) phases 4–5; and (d)
walk through how you plan to freeze the new state via Kotter’s (2017) phases 7 and 8.
This plan will require some imagination. The more familiar you are with your actual organization, the more
easily you can work out the likely scenario at each phase in realistic terms. A good plan is the result of
careful thinking over several iterations.
Evaluation Plan {new section} [main section header—centered, bold] [~1¾ pages].
Four paragraphs: (a) explain what this section will address (at least two sentences); (b)
determine who will collect the data to assess the current and post-intervention states of
the process and why this choice is logical; (c) identify what measures to use, when to
conduct the observations, and why this choice is logical; and (d) identify who will receive
the results and why this choice is logical.
For the measures, think in terms of what the identified process should do. Process specifications entail
dimensional boundaries (e.g., length, mass, durability, suitability) that distinguish success from error, even
if no one has ever stated them in the past.
Discussion. Add mentions of the new content (viz., the implementation plan and the
evaluation plan) to the discussion. Review the full discussion to consider further
adjustments based on the new content. Lastly, be sure to apply the kinds of routine
corrections that are appropriate in ordinary post-editing.
Standards. Minimum length = 2,400 words (body only; see syllabus for length
calculation). Cite at least the textbook plus six qualifying sources based on the criteria
described in the syllabus (purple section).
The length and citation criteria subsume those of the application essay. If you happened to meet the prior
1,400-word criterion and five qualifying articles exactly, then this essay will require 1,000 more words and
one more qualifying article.