My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Prof Double R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Prompt Create a PowerPoint presentation to make a recommendation for how the company should pursue the IoT technology to remain competitive: either by discontinuous or incremental innovation. To make your recommendation, you will need to identify how the evolving IoT (sensor) technology fits into…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Prompt

    Create a PowerPoint presentation to make a recommendation for how the company should pursue the IoT technology to remain competitive: either by discontinuous or incremental innovation. To make your recommendation, you will need to identify how the evolving IoT (sensor) technology fits into the company’s products and services and determine potential risks and benefits. You will also need to look at your competitors to see what they are doing. Finally, you need to analyze the company’s capability (resources) for pursuing the innovation. Use the information and data from the [CTO Brief](https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/1838213-MBA-580-10960.202517-1/Course%20Documents/MBA%20580%20CTO%20Brief.pdf?ou=1838213), [Comparative Growth Data](https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/1838213-MBA-580-10960.202517-1/Course%20Documents/MBA%20580%20Comparative%20Growth%20Data.xlsx?ou=1838213), [Comparative Operating Statistics](https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/1838213-MBA-580-10960.202517-1/Course%20Documents/MBA%20580%20Comparative%20Operating%20Statistics.xlsx?ou=1838213), and [Comparative Product Plans](https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/1838213-MBA-580-10960.202517-1/Course%20Documents/MBA%20580%20Comparative%20Product%20Plans.xlsx?ou=1838213) to complete this milestone. Note: Remember to use both on-slide text and narration or speaker notes to convey your information effectively. If narration is not possible, precise and extensive speaker notes should be used, while addressing all of the rubric elements in the presentation. For example, you can use brief, bulleted lists on the slide and include detailed explanations in your narration or speaker notes.

    1. Explain potential risks and benefits for options A and B.
    – **Overview** (1 slide): Present the business problem and options A and B.
    – **Option A** (1–2 slides) **:** Explain at least two potential risks and benefits for option A.
    – **Option B** (1–2 slides) **:** Explain at least two potential risks and benefits for option B.
    2. Compare your competition’s products and services.
    – **Competitors**(3–4 slides): Evaluate the competitors’ current products and services.

    – What are your competitors' current products and services?
    – Are your competitors expanding in the current market? Explain how this impacts their market strength.
    3. Analyze your company’s capability to pursue the innovation.
    – **Complete a partial gap analysis**(2 slides):

    – Does your company own the technology, or does it need to be purchased?
    – How is the technology currently being used in today’s products and services?
    – What type of technology is available to purchase?
    4. Recommend the innovation approach your company should pursue.
    – **Innovation approach**(2 slides): Explain which innovation approach you are recommending and why.

    – Consider the different stakeholders—research and development (R&D), marketing, finance—when communicating your recommendations.
    1. Include a description of the incremental or discontinuous product that you are recommending for R&D.
    2. Include the sales forecasts for marketing.
    3. Include a financial snapshot for finance.

    ## What to Submit

    Create a PowerPoint presentation with on-slide text and narration or detailed speaker notes. Your presentation should be 10 to 13 slides in length. If you include references, they should be cited according to APA style

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] ASSESSMENT 95

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ASSESSMENT95INST.docx **## ASSESSMENT95INST.docx** Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and record a 10–15 minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professiona…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ASSESSMENT95INST.docx

    **## ASSESSMENT95INST.docx**

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and record a 10–15 minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.

    Collapse All

    ### Introduction

    Baccalaureate-prepared nurses have many opportunities to reflect on their contributions to patient care outcomes during clinical experiences. Research suggests that creating and sharing video reflections may enhance learning (Speed, Lucarelli, & Macaulay, 2018).

    For this assessment, you'll present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and reflect on various aspects of your capstone practicum experience. Such reflection will give you a chance to discuss elements of the project of which you are most proud and aspects of the experience that will help you grow in your personal practice and nursing career.

    ##### Reference

    Speed, C. J., Lucarelli, G. A., & Macaulay, J. O. (2018). Student produced videos—An innovative and creative approach to assessment.
    _Sciedu International Journal of Higher Education, 7_(4).

    ### Instructions

    Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and (b) record a video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program.

    #### Part 1

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group. Plan to spend at least 3 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also consult with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Be sure you've logged all of your practicum hours in Capella Academic Portal.

    The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the Capella Academic Portal. Please review the
    [BSN Practicum Campus page](https://campus.capella.edu/school-of-nursing-and-health-sciences/practicum/bsn-practicum) for more information and instructions on how to log your hours.

    Use the
    [Intervention Feedback Form: Assessment 5 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36960/files/6486232?wrap=1) [Download Intervention Feedback Form: Assessment 5 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36960/files/6486232/download?download_frd=1) (DOWN BELOW) as a guide to capturing patient, family, or group feedback about your intervention. You'll include the feedback as part of your capstone reflection video.

    #### Part 2

    Record a 10–15 minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program. A transcript of your video is not required.

    You're welcome to use any tools and software with which you are comfortable, but make sure you're able to submit the deliverable to your faculty. Capella offers Kaltura, a program that records audio and video. Refer to
    [Using Kaltura](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4533) for more information about this courseroom tool.

    Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in these activities, please contact
    [DisabilityServices@Capella.edu](mailto:DisabilityServices@Capella.edu) to request accommodations. If you're unable to record a video, please contact your faculty as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

    ### Requirements

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for supporting evidence.

    · Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction and quality of life.

    · Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group on your intervention as a solution to the problem.

    · Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or group experience.

    · Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement your capstone project.

    · Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed this aspect of your project.

    · Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care technology in your capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with the patient, family, or group.

    · Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in future practice.

    · Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to policy development.

    · Note specific observations related to the baccalaureate-prepared nurse's role in policy implementation and development.

    · Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched your initial predictions.

    · Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell short of your expectations.

    · Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a best practice.

    · Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this particular setting.

    · Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.

    · Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards.

    · Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in which you have taken particular satisfaction.

    · Communicate professionally in a clear, audible, and well-organized video.

    ### Additional Requirements

    Cite at least three scholarly or authoritative sources to support your assertions. In addition to your reflection video, submit a separate APA-formatted reference list of your sources.

    ### Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

    · Describe one's use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement a capstone project.

    · Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    · Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched one's initial predictions and documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form. Document the completion of nine hours of practicum time.

    · Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

    · Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group.

    · Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

    · Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of one's capstone project, as well as any contributions the project made to policy development.

    · Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

    · Assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life.

    · Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    · Assess one's personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.

    · Communicate professionally in a clear and well-organized video.

    Intervention Feedback Form
    Assessment 5
    Note: Please include this feedback in your capstone video.
    You do not have to submit the completed feedback form; it’s simply a guide to help you capture
    patient, family, or group feedback about your intervention.
    1. Meeting date(s).
    2. Length of the meeting(s) (in hours).
    3. Location(s) of the meeting(s).
    4. Describe the problem you were addressing.
    5. Why was this a problem for the patient, family, or group?
    6. What was your intervention?
    7. How will the patient, family, or group apply the intervention?
    8. How often will the intervention be used and under what circumstances?
    9. How easy was it for the patient, family, or group to use the intervention?
    10. Describe any challenges associated with the patient, family, or group’s use of the
    intervention.
    11. Were instructions necessary?
    12. What did the patient, family, or group say about using the intervention?
    13. Was the intervention helpful?
    14. How will the patient, family, or group continue to use the intervention?
    15. Explain how the intervention positively or negatively affected the patient, family, or
    group’s life.
    16. How can the effect be measured?
    17. Update the total number of hours on the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in
    Capella Academic Portal.

    **## ASSESSMENT95INST.docx**

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and record a 10–15 minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.

    Collapse All

    ### Introduction

    Baccalaureate-prepared nurses have many opportunities to reflect on their contributions to patient care outcomes during clinical experiences. Research suggests that creating and sharing video reflections may enhance learning (Speed, Lucarelli, & Macaulay, 2018).

    For this assessment, you'll present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and reflect on various aspects of your capstone practicum experience. Such reflection will give you a chance to discuss elements of the project of which you are most proud and aspects of the experience that will help you grow in your personal practice and nursing career.

    ##### Reference

    Speed, C. J., Lucarelli, G. A., & Macaulay, J. O. (2018). Student produced videos—An innovative and creative approach to assessment.
    _Sciedu International Journal of Higher Education, 7_(4).

    ### Instructions

    Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and (b) record a video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program.

    #### Part 1

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group. Plan to spend at least 3 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also consult with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Be sure you've logged all of your practicum hours in Capella Academic Portal.

    The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the Capella Academic Portal. Please review the
    [BSN Practicum Campus page](https://campus.capella.edu/school-of-nursing-and-health-sciences/practicum/bsn-practicum) for more information and instructions on how to log your hours.

    Use the
    [Intervention Feedback Form: Assessment 5 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36960/files/6486232?wrap=1) [Download Intervention Feedback Form: Assessment 5 [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36960/files/6486232/download?download_frd=1) (DOWN BELOW) as a guide to capturing patient, family, or group feedback about your intervention. You'll include the feedback as part of your capstone reflection video.

    #### Part 2

    Record a 10–15 minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program. A transcript of your video is not required.

    You're welcome to use any tools and software with which you are comfortable, but make sure you're able to submit the deliverable to your faculty. Capella offers Kaltura, a program that records audio and video. Refer to
    [Using Kaltura](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4533) for more information about this courseroom tool.

    Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in these activities, please contact
    [DisabilityServices@Capella.edu](mailto:DisabilityServices@Capella.edu) to request accommodations. If you're unable to record a video, please contact your faculty as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

    ### Requirements

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for supporting evidence.

    · Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction and quality of life.

    · Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group on your intervention as a solution to the problem.

    · Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or group experience.

    · Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement your capstone project.

    · Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed this aspect of your project.

    · Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care technology in your capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with the patient, family, or group.

    · Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in future practice.

    · Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to policy development.

    · Note specific observations related to the baccalaureate-prepared nurse's role in policy implementation and development.

    · Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched your initial predictions.

    · Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell short of your expectations.

    · Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a best practice.

    · Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this particular setting.

    · Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.

    · Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.

    · Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards.

    · Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in which you have taken particular satisfaction.

    · Communicate professionally in a clear, audible, and well-organized video.

    ### Additional Requirements

    Cite at least three scholarly or authoritative sources to support your assertions. In addition to your reflection video, submit a separate APA-formatted reference list of your sources.

    ### Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

    · Describe one's use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement a capstone project.

    · Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    · Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched one's initial predictions and documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form. Document the completion of nine hours of practicum time.

    · Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

    · Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group.

    · Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

    · Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of one's capstone project, as well as any contributions the project made to policy development.

    · Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

    · Assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life.

    · Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    · Assess one's personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.

    · Communicate professionally in a clear and well-organized video.

    Intervention Feedback Form
    Assessment 5
    Note: Please include this feedback in your capstone video.
    You do not have to submit the completed feedback form; it’s simply a guide to help you capture
    patient, family, or group feedback about your intervention.
    1. Meeting date(s).
    2. Length of the meeting(s) (in hours).
    3. Location(s) of the meeting(s).
    4. Describe the problem you were addressing.
    5. Why was this a problem for the patient, family, or group?
    6. What was your intervention?
    7. How will the patient, family, or group apply the intervention?
    8. How often will the intervention be used and under what circumstances?
    9. How easy was it for the patient, family, or group to use the intervention?
    10. Describe any challenges associated with the patient, family, or group’s use of the
    intervention.
    11. Were instructions necessary?
    12. What did the patient, family, or group say about using the intervention?
    13. Was the intervention helpful?
    14. How will the patient, family, or group continue to use the intervention?
    15. Explain how the intervention positively or negatively affected the patient, family, or
    group’s life.
    16. How can the effect be measured?
    17. Update the total number of hours on the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in
    Capella Academic Portal.

  • [Solved] Nursing HOMEWORK

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WEEK9PRACASSIGNMENT.docx **## WEEK9PRACASSIGNMENT.docx** **Reflections on Evidence-Based Practice, Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Standards of Care** **To Prepare** · **Identify a Case:** · **Choose a patient case from your clinical experience where you and your p…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WEEK9PRACASSIGNMENT.docx

    **## WEEK9PRACASSIGNMENT.docx**

    **Reflections on Evidence-Based Practice, Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Standards of Care**

    **To Prepare**

    ·
    **Identify a Case:**

    ·
    **Choose a patient case from your clinical experience where you and your preceptor approached the treatment plan differently.**

    ·
    **Research evidence-based information pertinent to your chosen patient for treatment Clinical Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care.**

    **Submission Requirements:**

    ·
    **Length: 3-4 pages, double-spaced, APA format.**

    ·
    **Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed sources to support your analysis.**

    **Evaluation Criteria:**

    ·
    **Clarity and completeness of the case summary.**

    ·
    **Depth of analysis and comparison between treatment plans.**

    ·
    **Use of evidence-based rationale for your alternative plan.**

    ·
    **Reflection on learning and future application.**

    ·
    **Proper use of APA formatting and references.**

    Assignment

    Write a paper:

    **Briefly summarize:**

    · The patient case, including all relevant information: the patient's history, assessment findings, medications, any pertinent testing, presenting symptoms, and the final diagnosis (ensure patient confidentiality).

    **Compare Treatment Plans:**

    · Describe your preceptor’s recommended treatment plan and interventions.

    · Explain the alternative treatment plan you would have recommended as a nurse practitioner based upon Clinical Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care.

    **Justify Your Approach:**

    · Use evidence-based guidelines, clinical research, and relevant literature to support your alternative plan.

    · Discuss why you believe your approach would be effective, considering the patient’s history, condition, and individual needs.
    Reflect on Differences:

    · Analyze the differences between your plan and your preceptor’s.

    · Consider factors such as clinical experience, knowledge, patient-centered care, and the influence of evidence-based practice in decision-making.

    Lessons Learned:

    · Reflect on how this experience has influenced your clinical practice and approach to treatment planning.

    · Discuss how you can apply what you learned to future patient care.

    · How might you approach another provider professionally in the future when you find treatment plans differing during collaboration on the patient case?

    **## WEEK9PRACASSIGNMENT.docx**

    **Reflections on Evidence-Based Practice, Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Standards of Care**

    **To Prepare**

    ·
    **Identify a Case:**

    ·
    **Choose a patient case from your clinical experience where you and your preceptor approached the treatment plan differently.**

    ·
    **Research evidence-based information pertinent to your chosen patient for treatment Clinical Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care.**

    **Submission Requirements:**

    ·
    **Length: 3-4 pages, double-spaced, APA format.**

    ·
    **Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed sources to support your analysis.**

    **Evaluation Criteria:**

    ·
    **Clarity and completeness of the case summary.**

    ·
    **Depth of analysis and comparison between treatment plans.**

    ·
    **Use of evidence-based rationale for your alternative plan.**

    ·
    **Reflection on learning and future application.**

    ·
    **Proper use of APA formatting and references.**

    Assignment

    Write a paper:

    **Briefly summarize:**

    · The patient case, including all relevant information: the patient's history, assessment findings, medications, any pertinent testing, presenting symptoms, and the final diagnosis (ensure patient confidentiality).

    **Compare Treatment Plans:**

    · Describe your preceptor’s recommended treatment plan and interventions.

    · Explain the alternative treatment plan you would have recommended as a nurse practitioner based upon Clinical Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care.

    **Justify Your Approach:**

    · Use evidence-based guidelines, clinical research, and relevant literature to support your alternative plan.

    · Discuss why you believe your approach would be effective, considering the patient’s history, condition, and individual needs.
    Reflect on Differences:

    · Analyze the differences between your plan and your preceptor’s.

    · Consider factors such as clinical experience, knowledge, patient-centered care, and the influence of evidence-based practice in decision-making.

    Lessons Learned:

    · Reflect on how this experience has influenced your clinical practice and approach to treatment planning.

    · Discuss how you can apply what you learned to future patient care.

    · How might you approach another provider professionally in the future when you find treatment plans differing during collaboration on the patient case?

  • [Solved] PLAGIARISM FREE IN 8 HOURS or LESS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Choose one of the following topics and elaborate on it using 200 words. **1)** As a participant in the ongoing dialogue of organizational communication, explain the importance of studying theories. **2)** What is meant by “all talk is partial, partisan, and problematic”? **3)** What are the basic as…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Choose one of the following topics and elaborate on it using 200 words.

    **1)** As a participant in the ongoing dialogue of organizational communication, explain the importance of studying theories.

    **2)** What is meant by “all talk is partial, partisan, and problematic”?

    **3)** What are the basic assumptions of the classical management theory? What is the underlying metaphor associated with this theory?

    **4)** How does a horrific event like the Holocaust provide an example of the abuse of classical principles of organization?

    **5)** What is meant by the term particularism, and how did the new system of bureaucracy try to protect employees from the practice of particularism? What are some of the factors that limit the true realization of this system?

    **6)** What kinds of changes were happening during the Great Depression and World War II that influenced our understanding of organizations and led to the emergence of the human relations perspective?

    **7)** What were the main conclusions of the Hawthorne studies? What were the implications on organizational views?

    **8)** Explain the main differences between the human relations perspective and the human resources approach.

    **9)** How does the role of dialogue differ within each approach? How is it problematic to balance the creativity and constraint of dialogue within these models?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Soap note

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    About women’s health. 45 year old female coming in for a routine Pap smear – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## SOAPNoteTemplate.docx – IMG_1088.png – IMG_1089.png **## SOAPNoteTemplate.docx** | | | | — | — | | SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE<br>Review the Rubric for more Guidance | | _Demographics_ | | | _Chi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    About women’s health. 45 year old female coming in for a routine Pap smear

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## SOAPNoteTemplate.docx

    – IMG_1088.png
    – IMG_1089.png

    **## SOAPNoteTemplate.docx**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE<br>Review the Rubric for more Guidance |
    | _Demographics_ | |
    | _Chief Complaint (Reason for seeking health care)_ | |
    | _History of Present Illness (HPI)_ | |
    | _Allergies_ | |
    | _Review of Systems (ROS)_ | General: <br>HEENT:<br>Neck: <br>Lungs:<br>Cardio<br>Breast: <br>GI: <br>M/F genital:<br>GU: <br>Neuro<br>Musculo:<br>Activity:<br>Psychosocial: <br>Derm: <br>Nutrition:<br>Sleep/Rest:<br>LMP: <br>STI Hx: |
    | _Vital Signs_ | |
    | _Labs_ | |
    | _Medications_ | |
    | _Past Medical History_ | |
    | _Past Surgical History_ | |
    | _Family History_ | |
    | _Social History_ | |
    | _Health Maintenance/ Screenings_ | |
    | _Physical Examination_ | General: <br>HEENT:<br>Neck: <br>Lungs:<br>Cardio<br>Breast: <br>GI: <br>M/F genital:<br>GU: <br>Neuro<br>Musculo:<br>Activity:<br>Psychosocial: <br>Derm: |
    | _Diagnosis_ | |
    | _Differential Diagnosis_ | |
    | _ICD 10 Coding_ | |
    | _Pharmacologic treatment plan_ | |
    | _Diagnostic/Lab Testing_ | |
    | _Education_ | |
    | _Anticipatory Guidance_ | |
    | _Follow up plan_ | |
    | _Prescription_ | See Below (scroll down) |
    | _References_ | |
    | _Grammar_ | |

    | |
    | — |
    | EA#: 101010101 STU Clinic LIC# 10000000 |
    | Tel: (000) 555-1234 FAX: (000) 555-12222 |
    | Patient Name: (Initials)______________________________ Age ___________<br>Date: _______________<br>RX ______________________________________<br>SIG:<br>Dispense: ___________ Refill: _________________<br>No Substitution<br> <br>Signature:____________________________________________________________ |

    Signature (with appropriate credentials):_____________________________________

    References (must use current evidence-based guidelines used to guide the care [Mandatory])

    **IMG_1088.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1088-png)

    **IMG_1089.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1089-png)

    **IMG_1089.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1089-png)

    **## SOAPNoteTemplate.docx**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE<br>Review the Rubric for more Guidance |
    | _Demographics_ | |
    | _Chief Complaint (Reason for seeking health care)_ | |
    | _History of Present Illness (HPI)_ | |
    | _Allergies_ | |
    | _Review of Systems (ROS)_ | General: <br>HEENT:<br>Neck: <br>Lungs:<br>Cardio<br>Breast: <br>GI: <br>M/F genital:<br>GU: <br>Neuro<br>Musculo:<br>Activity:<br>Psychosocial: <br>Derm: <br>Nutrition:<br>Sleep/Rest:<br>LMP: <br>STI Hx: |
    | _Vital Signs_ | |
    | _Labs_ | |
    | _Medications_ | |
    | _Past Medical History_ | |
    | _Past Surgical History_ | |
    | _Family History_ | |
    | _Social History_ | |
    | _Health Maintenance/ Screenings_ | |
    | _Physical Examination_ | General: <br>HEENT:<br>Neck: <br>Lungs:<br>Cardio<br>Breast: <br>GI: <br>M/F genital:<br>GU: <br>Neuro<br>Musculo:<br>Activity:<br>Psychosocial: <br>Derm: |
    | _Diagnosis_ | |
    | _Differential Diagnosis_ | |
    | _ICD 10 Coding_ | |
    | _Pharmacologic treatment plan_ | |
    | _Diagnostic/Lab Testing_ | |
    | _Education_ | |
    | _Anticipatory Guidance_ | |
    | _Follow up plan_ | |
    | _Prescription_ | See Below (scroll down) |
    | _References_ | |
    | _Grammar_ | |

    | |
    | — |
    | EA#: 101010101 STU Clinic LIC# 10000000 |
    | Tel: (000) 555-1234 FAX: (000) 555-12222 |
    | Patient Name: (Initials)______________________________ Age ___________<br>Date: _______________<br>RX ______________________________________<br>SIG:<br>Dispense: ___________ Refill: _________________<br>No Substitution<br> <br>Signature:____________________________________________________________ |

    Signature (with appropriate credentials):_____________________________________

    References (must use current evidence-based guidelines used to guide the care [Mandatory])

    **IMG_1088.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1088-png)

    **IMG_1089.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1089-png)

    **## SOAPNoteTemplate.docx**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE<br>Review the Rubric for more Guidance |
    | _Demographics_ | |
    | _Chief Complaint (Reason for seeking health care)_ | |
    | _History of Present Illness (HPI)_ | |
    | _Allergies_ | |
    | _Review of Systems (ROS)_ | General: <br>HEENT:<br>Neck: <br>Lungs:<br>Cardio<br>Breast: <br>GI: <br>M/F genital:<br>GU: <br>Neuro<br>Musculo:<br>Activity:<br>Psychosocial: <br>Derm: <br>Nutrition:<br>Sleep/Rest:<br>LMP: <br>STI Hx: |
    | _Vital Signs_ | |
    | _Labs_ | |
    | _Medications_ | |
    | _Past Medical History_ | |
    | _Past Surgical History_ | |
    | _Family History_ | |
    | _Social History_ | |
    | _Health Maintenance/ Screenings_ | |
    | _Physical Examination_ | General: <br>HEENT:<br>Neck: <br>Lungs:<br>Cardio<br>Breast: <br>GI: <br>M/F genital:<br>GU: <br>Neuro<br>Musculo:<br>Activity:<br>Psychosocial: <br>Derm: |
    | _Diagnosis_ | |
    | _Differential Diagnosis_ | |
    | _ICD 10 Coding_ | |
    | _Pharmacologic treatment plan_ | |
    | _Diagnostic/Lab Testing_ | |
    | _Education_ | |
    | _Anticipatory Guidance_ | |
    | _Follow up plan_ | |
    | _Prescription_ | See Below (scroll down) |
    | _References_ | |
    | _Grammar_ | |

    | |
    | — |
    | EA#: 101010101 STU Clinic LIC# 10000000 |
    | Tel: (000) 555-1234 FAX: (000) 555-12222 |
    | Patient Name: (Initials)______________________________ Age ___________<br>Date: _______________<br>RX ______________________________________<br>SIG:<br>Dispense: ___________ Refill: _________________<br>No Substitution<br> <br>Signature:____________________________________________________________ |

    Signature (with appropriate credentials):_____________________________________

    References (must use current evidence-based guidelines used to guide the care [Mandatory])

    **IMG_1088.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1088-png)

    **IMG_1089.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-1089-png)

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Anatomy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-anatomy) – Falta, D. A. (2022). _Maxwell’s understanding environmental health: How we live in the world_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning, L.L.C. – Chapter 6, “Producing Manufactured Goods” – Section 6.3, “Hazards in the Workplac…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Anatomy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-anatomy)

    – Falta, D. A. (2022). _Maxwell’s understanding environmental health: How we live in the world_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning, L.L.C.

    – Chapter 6, “Producing Manufactured Goods”

    – Section 6.3, “Hazards in the Workplace” (pp. 159–165)
    – Chapter 8, “Living in the World We’ve Made”

    – Section 8.1, “The ‘Metabolism’ of Communities” (pp. 226–239)
    – Section 8.2, “Management of Sewage Wastes” (pp. 240–246)
    – Section 8.3, “Drinking Water: Public Systems and Private Wells” (pp. 247–251)
    – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). [_About waterborne disease surveillance_Links to an external site.](https://www.cdc.gov/healthy-water-data/about/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/surveillance/burden/index.html). https://www.cdc.gov/healthy-water-data/about/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/surveillance/burden/index.html

    – United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2022). [Drinking water regulationsLinks to an external site.](https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/drinking-water-regulations). _Drinking Water Requirements for States and Public Water Systems_. https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/drinking-water-regulations

    – United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2022). [_Private drinking water wells._Links to an external site.](https://www.epa.gov/privatewells) https://www.epa.gov/privatewells

    – World Health Organization. (2022). [_Drinking-water_Links to an external site.](https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drinking-water#:~:text=Water%20and%20health,hepatitis%20A%2C%20typhoid%20and%20polio). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drinking-water#:~:text=Water%20and%20health,hepatitis%20A%2C%20typhoid%20and%20poli

    Create a 3- to 4-slide narrated PowerPoint Presentation of the public health issue or topic. Your PowerPoint Presentation should address the following:

    – Describe the local and global impacts of the public health topic that you have selected. Be sure to explain how a community should expect to address this topic. Be specific and provide examples.
    – Explain how your group, as a public health agency/organization plans on addressing and mitigating the public health topic you selected for the community. What are the local and global response plans? Be specific.
    – Explain how your public health agency/organization plans on monitoring and engaging in surveillance for the public health topic you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
    – Cite the sources that you used. Put in-text citations on your slides to be clear which portions of the text came from what source and then list the full sources in APA format at the bottom of the slide in a small font.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] academic integrity

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In less than 250 words, discuss how academic integrity in the classroom relates to professional accountability in nursing practice. How will you ensure academic integrity in your work? While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentat…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In less than 250 words, discuss how academic integrity in the classroom relates to professional accountability in nursing practice. How will you ensure academic integrity in your work?

    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] report

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) citenzen centric about denver acfr 2023 – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    citenzen centric about denver acfr 2023

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] research and report

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) need more comprehension about denver acfr 2023 report – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    need more comprehension about denver acfr 2023 report

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Focused SOAP Note

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attached – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## week9part2question.docx – PRAC6665FocusedSOAPNoteTemplaterev12.20221.doc **## week9part2question.docx** · Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## week9part2question.docx

    – PRAC6665FocusedSOAPNoteTemplaterev12.20221.doc

    **## week9part2question.docx**

    · Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.

    · Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.

    · Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Specifically address the following for the patient, using your SOAP note as a guide:

    ·
    **Subjective:** What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?

    ·
    **Objective:** What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?

    ·
    **Assessment:** Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with
    _DSM-5_ diagnostic criteria and supported by the patient’s symptoms.

    ·
    **Plan:** In your video, describe your treatment plan using clinical practice guidelines supported by evidence-based practice. Include a discussion on your chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and include alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. All treatment choices must have a discussion of your rationale for the choice supported by valid research. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this treatment session?

    · In your written plan include all the above as well as include one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.

    ·
    **Reflection notes:** What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session over? If you are able to follow up with your patient, explain whether these interventions were successful and why or why not. If you were not able to conduct a follow up, discuss what your next intervention would be.

    **PRAC_6665_Week9_Assignment2_Pt1_Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Subjective data:• Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent histories and/or ROS | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately and concisely presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video accurately presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The video presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The video presents an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or subjective documentation is missing. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Objective data:• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately and concisely documents the patient's physical exam for pertinent systems. Pertinent diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response accurately documents the patient's physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Documentation of the patient's physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain inaccuracies. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose documentation of the patient's physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or objective documentation is missing. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss results of Assessment:• Results of the mental status examination• Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **20 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Video presents at least three differentials in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient, and a rationale for their selection. Response justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **17 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video adequately documents the results of the mental status exam. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response adequately justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The video presents the results of the mental status exam, with some vagueness or inaccuracy. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response somewhat vaguely justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **13 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or assessment documentation is missing. | | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss treatment Plan:• A treatment plan for the patient that addresses chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. The treatment plan includes rationales, a plan for follow-up parameters, and referrals. The discussion includes one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030, one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **20 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video clearly and concisely outlines an evidence-based treatment plan for the patient that addresses FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments and rationale supported by valid research. … Discussion includes a clear and concise follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear and concise referral plan. … The paper discussion contains all 3 elements from the assignment directions including a discussion demonstrating critical thinking of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly and concisely relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **17 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video clearly outlines an appropriate treatment plan without evidence-based discussion for the patient that addresses FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments and rationale supported by vague or questionable research. … Discussion includes a clear follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear referral plan…. The paper discussion contains 2 of the elements from the assignment directions with one being a basic discussion of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient that addresses psychopharmacologic agents without discussion of FDA approval and includes vague or inaccurate alternative treatments with little rationale discussed. … The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding the follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding a referral plan. … The paper discussion contains 1 of the required elements from the assignment directions which is the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates…. Somewhat vaguely or inaccurately relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **13 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not address the treatment plan or the treatment plan is not appropriate for the assessment and the diagnosis. There is no mention of FDA approval for treatment choices or no research supported discussion. Alternative treatment discussion is missing. … Rationales for treatments are missing. … There is no discussion for follow-up and parameters. … There is no discussion of a referral plan. … The paper discussion is missing discussion relating to the psychiatric and mental health field or relates discussion to another specialty realm including medical co-morbidity illnesses. | | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation style | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. | | 5 pts |
    | Total Points: 80 |

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148901/modules/items/5873037) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148901/modules/items/5873047)

    **PRAC6665FocusedSOAPNoteTemplaterev12.20221.doc**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/prac6665focusedsoapnotetemplaterev12-20221-doc-10167341)

    **PRAC6665FocusedSOAPNoteTemplaterev12.20221.doc**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/prac6665focusedsoapnotetemplaterev12-20221-doc-10167341)

    **## week9part2question.docx**

    · Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.

    · Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.

    · Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Specifically address the following for the patient, using your SOAP note as a guide:

    ·
    **Subjective:** What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?

    ·
    **Objective:** What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?

    ·
    **Assessment:** Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with
    _DSM-5_ diagnostic criteria and supported by the patient’s symptoms.

    ·
    **Plan:** In your video, describe your treatment plan using clinical practice guidelines supported by evidence-based practice. Include a discussion on your chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and include alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. All treatment choices must have a discussion of your rationale for the choice supported by valid research. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this treatment session?

    · In your written plan include all the above as well as include one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.

    ·
    **Reflection notes:** What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session over? If you are able to follow up with your patient, explain whether these interventions were successful and why or why not. If you were not able to conduct a follow up, discuss what your next intervention would be.

    **PRAC_6665_Week9_Assignment2_Pt1_Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Subjective data:• Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent histories and/or ROS | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately and concisely presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video accurately presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The video presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The video presents an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or subjective documentation is missing. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Objective data:• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately and concisely documents the patient's physical exam for pertinent systems. Pertinent diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response accurately documents the patient's physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Documentation of the patient's physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain inaccuracies. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose documentation of the patient's physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or objective documentation is missing. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss results of Assessment:• Results of the mental status examination• Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **20 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Video presents at least three differentials in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient, and a rationale for their selection. Response justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **17 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video adequately documents the results of the mental status exam. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response adequately justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The video presents the results of the mental status exam, with some vagueness or inaccuracy. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response somewhat vaguely justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **13 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or assessment documentation is missing. | | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss treatment Plan:• A treatment plan for the patient that addresses chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. The treatment plan includes rationales, a plan for follow-up parameters, and referrals. The discussion includes one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030, one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **20 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video clearly and concisely outlines an evidence-based treatment plan for the patient that addresses FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments and rationale supported by valid research. … Discussion includes a clear and concise follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear and concise referral plan. … The paper discussion contains all 3 elements from the assignment directions including a discussion demonstrating critical thinking of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly and concisely relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **17 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video clearly outlines an appropriate treatment plan without evidence-based discussion for the patient that addresses FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments and rationale supported by vague or questionable research. … Discussion includes a clear follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear referral plan…. The paper discussion contains 2 of the elements from the assignment directions with one being a basic discussion of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient that addresses psychopharmacologic agents without discussion of FDA approval and includes vague or inaccurate alternative treatments with little rationale discussed. … The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding the follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding a referral plan. … The paper discussion contains 1 of the required elements from the assignment directions which is the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates…. Somewhat vaguely or inaccurately relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **13 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not address the treatment plan or the treatment plan is not appropriate for the assessment and the diagnosis. There is no mention of FDA approval for treatment choices or no research supported discussion. Alternative treatment discussion is missing. … Rationales for treatments are missing. … There is no discussion for follow-up and parameters. … There is no discussion of a referral plan. … The paper discussion is missing discussion relating to the psychiatric and mental health field or relates discussion to another specialty realm including medical co-morbidity illnesses. | | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation style | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. | | 5 pts |
    | Total Points: 80 |

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148901/modules/items/5873037) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148901/modules/items/5873047)

    **PRAC6665FocusedSOAPNoteTemplaterev12.20221.doc**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/prac6665focusedsoapnotetemplaterev12-20221-doc-10167341)

    **## week9part2question.docx**

    · Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.

    · Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.

    · Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Specifically address the following for the patient, using your SOAP note as a guide:

    ·
    **Subjective:** What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?

    ·
    **Objective:** What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?

    ·
    **Assessment:** Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with
    _DSM-5_ diagnostic criteria and supported by the patient’s symptoms.

    ·
    **Plan:** In your video, describe your treatment plan using clinical practice guidelines supported by evidence-based practice. Include a discussion on your chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and include alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. All treatment choices must have a discussion of your rationale for the choice supported by valid research. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this treatment session?

    · In your written plan include all the above as well as include one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.

    ·
    **Reflection notes:** What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session over? If you are able to follow up with your patient, explain whether these interventions were successful and why or why not. If you were not able to conduct a follow up, discuss what your next intervention would be.

    **PRAC_6665_Week9_Assignment2_Pt1_Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Subjective data:• Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent histories and/or ROS | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately and concisely presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video accurately presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The video presents the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The video presents an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or subjective documentation is missing. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Objective data:• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately and concisely documents the patient's physical exam for pertinent systems. Pertinent diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response accurately documents the patient's physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Documentation of the patient's physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain inaccuracies. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose documentation of the patient's physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or objective documentation is missing. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss results of Assessment:• Results of the mental status examination• Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **20 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Video presents at least three differentials in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient, and a rationale for their selection. Response justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **17 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video adequately documents the results of the mental status exam. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response adequately justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The video presents the results of the mental status exam, with some vagueness or inaccuracy. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response somewhat vaguely justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria. | **13 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or assessment documentation is missing. | | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss treatment Plan:• A treatment plan for the patient that addresses chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. The treatment plan includes rationales, a plan for follow-up parameters, and referrals. The discussion includes one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030, one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **20 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The video clearly and concisely outlines an evidence-based treatment plan for the patient that addresses FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments and rationale supported by valid research. … Discussion includes a clear and concise follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear and concise referral plan. … The paper discussion contains all 3 elements from the assignment directions including a discussion demonstrating critical thinking of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly and concisely relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **17 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The video clearly outlines an appropriate treatment plan without evidence-based discussion for the patient that addresses FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and includes alternative treatments and rationale supported by vague or questionable research. … Discussion includes a clear follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear referral plan…. The paper discussion contains 2 of the elements from the assignment directions with one being a basic discussion of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient that addresses psychopharmacologic agents without discussion of FDA approval and includes vague or inaccurate alternative treatments with little rationale discussed. … The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding the follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding a referral plan. … The paper discussion contains 1 of the required elements from the assignment directions which is the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates…. Somewhat vaguely or inaccurately relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. | **13 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not address the treatment plan or the treatment plan is not appropriate for the assessment and the diagnosis. There is no mention of FDA approval for treatment choices or no research supported discussion. Alternative treatment discussion is missing. … Rationales for treatments are missing. … There is no discussion for follow-up and parameters. … There is no discussion of a referral plan. … The paper discussion is missing discussion relating to the psychiatric and mental health field or relates discussion to another specialty realm including medical co-morbidity illnesses. | | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation style | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. | | 5 pts |
    | Total Points: 80 |

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148901/modules/items/5873037) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148901/modules/items/5873047)

    **PRAC6665FocusedSOAPNoteTemplaterev12.20221.doc**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/prac6665focusedsoapnotetemplaterev12-20221-doc-10167341)