My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Q2 R2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Post2response2.docx **## Post2response2.docx** Post 2 Response 2 100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/31/2025 Charlize During a crime there are many psychological factors that affect a witness’s perception, memory, and availability to provide evidence…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Post2response2.docx

    **## Post2response2.docx**

    Post 2 Response 2

    100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 1/31/2025

    Charlize

    During a crime there are many psychological factors that affect a witness’s perception, memory, and availability to provide evidence based strategies to reduce these challenges. High levels of stress during a crime can impair a witness's ability to encode memories accurately. There is a phenomenon called the “weapon focus”, which explains that the witness focuses on the weapon to the detriment of other details. Loftus et al. (1987) state, “Subjects who saw a weapon were less likely to identify the person holding the weapon than were subjects who saw a neutral object in the person's hand” (p. 56). Humans have a limited attention span, this causes witnesses to focus on salient or emotionally significant aspects of a crime, ignoring greater details. Overtime, memory naturally fades, and without proper retrieval cues, witnesses may lose critical details or introduce inaccuracies. There is also the misinformation effect  when witnesses are highly susceptible to suggestion, and may incorporate misleading post-event information. Certain witnesses may have distorted or selective memories, due to prior biases and beliefs. Lasty, investigators and jurors can be misled by a witness's overconfidence on inaccurate information. There are several methodologies and practices investigators can implement to enhance the reliability of witness observation. Investigators can use cognitive interview techniques developed by Fisher and Geiselman. Studies show that cognitive interviews have  25–35% more accurate information than traditional police interviews (Fisher et al., 1987). These techniques include reinstating the context of the crime scene and encouraging the witness to report every detail, no matter how trivial. This helps enhance a narrative and timeline, while reducing suggestibility. Conducting interviews in a short time period will help the witness remember more and give a more accurate timeline. Investigators should try to use open ended questions to let the witness see what they can recall without suggested information. Wells et al. (1998) found that sequential lineups significantly reduce false identifications. Lineups where suspects are presented one at a time, reduce the likelihood of false identifications by encouraging absolute judgments, instead of comparison. Isolating the witness from the media helps preserve memory integrity. As shown, there are many different methodologies, practices, and evidence-based strategies for mitigating the reliability, and accuracy of witness observations.

    **## Post2response2.docx**

    Post 2 Response 2

    100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 1/31/2025

    Charlize

    During a crime there are many psychological factors that affect a witness’s perception, memory, and availability to provide evidence based strategies to reduce these challenges. High levels of stress during a crime can impair a witness's ability to encode memories accurately. There is a phenomenon called the “weapon focus”, which explains that the witness focuses on the weapon to the detriment of other details. Loftus et al. (1987) state, “Subjects who saw a weapon were less likely to identify the person holding the weapon than were subjects who saw a neutral object in the person's hand” (p. 56). Humans have a limited attention span, this causes witnesses to focus on salient or emotionally significant aspects of a crime, ignoring greater details. Overtime, memory naturally fades, and without proper retrieval cues, witnesses may lose critical details or introduce inaccuracies. There is also the misinformation effect  when witnesses are highly susceptible to suggestion, and may incorporate misleading post-event information. Certain witnesses may have distorted or selective memories, due to prior biases and beliefs. Lasty, investigators and jurors can be misled by a witness's overconfidence on inaccurate information. There are several methodologies and practices investigators can implement to enhance the reliability of witness observation. Investigators can use cognitive interview techniques developed by Fisher and Geiselman. Studies show that cognitive interviews have  25–35% more accurate information than traditional police interviews (Fisher et al., 1987). These techniques include reinstating the context of the crime scene and encouraging the witness to report every detail, no matter how trivial. This helps enhance a narrative and timeline, while reducing suggestibility. Conducting interviews in a short time period will help the witness remember more and give a more accurate timeline. Investigators should try to use open ended questions to let the witness see what they can recall without suggested information. Wells et al. (1998) found that sequential lineups significantly reduce false identifications. Lineups where suspects are presented one at a time, reduce the likelihood of false identifications by encouraging absolute judgments, instead of comparison. Isolating the witness from the media helps preserve memory integrity. As shown, there are many different methodologies, practices, and evidence-based strategies for mitigating the reliability, and accuracy of witness observations.

  • [Solved] Q2 R1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Post2response1.docx **## Post2response1.docx** Post 2 Response 1 100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/31/2025 Epps Enhancing the reliability and accuracy of witness observations is essential for investigators since eyewitness testimony can greatly inf…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Post2response1.docx

    **## Post2response1.docx**

    Post 2 Response 1

    100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 1/31/2025

    Epps

    Enhancing the reliability and accuracy of witness observations is essential for investigators since eyewitness testimony can greatly influence legal outcomes. There are various methodologies and best practices that can be employed to improve the accuracy of witness reports and address psychological factors affecting perception and memory. Key psychological factors include stress, time delays, and cognitive biases, which can distort a witness's recall of events.

    One effective methodology for improving eyewitness testimony is the Cognitive Interview (CI) technique, developed by Geiselman et al. (1985). This method encourages witnesses to mentally reconstruct the context of the event, allowing them to recall more details without leading questions. Key features of the CI include context reinstatement, free recall, recall from different perspectives, and changing the order of recall. Research shows that CI enhances the accuracy and completeness of eyewitness recall (Memon, Meissner, & Fraser, 2010). Additionally, minimizing suggestive questioning is crucial, as leading questions can implant false information into a witness's memory (Loftus & Pickrell, 1995). Furthermore, best practices for presenting lineups and photo arrays, such as using a blind administrator and ensuring lineups resemble the suspect's description, can reduce mistaken identification (Wells et al., 2015).

    Psychological factors like stress and arousal can impair a witness's perception and memory, as suggested by the Yerkes-Dodson Law (1908), which indicates that excessive stress narrows attention. Time delays also contribute to memory degradation, with Loftus and Palmer (1974) noting that prolonged intervals can lead to distorted memories. Cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, can further skew recollections. To mitigate these challenges, investigators should create a supportive interview environment, avoid providing feedback during identification processes, and shield witnesses from post-event information (Wells et al., 2015; Loftus & Palmer, 1974). By implementing these evidence-based strategies, investigators can secure more accurate eyewitness testimony, enhancing the fairness of legal proceedings.

    **## Post2response1.docx**

    Post 2 Response 1

    100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 1/31/2025

    Epps

    Enhancing the reliability and accuracy of witness observations is essential for investigators since eyewitness testimony can greatly influence legal outcomes. There are various methodologies and best practices that can be employed to improve the accuracy of witness reports and address psychological factors affecting perception and memory. Key psychological factors include stress, time delays, and cognitive biases, which can distort a witness's recall of events.

    One effective methodology for improving eyewitness testimony is the Cognitive Interview (CI) technique, developed by Geiselman et al. (1985). This method encourages witnesses to mentally reconstruct the context of the event, allowing them to recall more details without leading questions. Key features of the CI include context reinstatement, free recall, recall from different perspectives, and changing the order of recall. Research shows that CI enhances the accuracy and completeness of eyewitness recall (Memon, Meissner, & Fraser, 2010). Additionally, minimizing suggestive questioning is crucial, as leading questions can implant false information into a witness's memory (Loftus & Pickrell, 1995). Furthermore, best practices for presenting lineups and photo arrays, such as using a blind administrator and ensuring lineups resemble the suspect's description, can reduce mistaken identification (Wells et al., 2015).

    Psychological factors like stress and arousal can impair a witness's perception and memory, as suggested by the Yerkes-Dodson Law (1908), which indicates that excessive stress narrows attention. Time delays also contribute to memory degradation, with Loftus and Palmer (1974) noting that prolonged intervals can lead to distorted memories. Cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, can further skew recollections. To mitigate these challenges, investigators should create a supportive interview environment, avoid providing feedback during identification processes, and shield witnesses from post-event information (Wells et al., 2015; Loftus & Palmer, 1974). By implementing these evidence-based strategies, investigators can secure more accurate eyewitness testimony, enhancing the fairness of legal proceedings.

  • [Solved] Q1 R2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Post1response.docx **## Post1response.docx** Post 1 Response 2 100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/31/2025 Schroeder Legal, scientific, and ethical considerations can prevent polygraph examinations from being admissible as direct evidence in court. L…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Post1response.docx

    **## Post1response.docx**

    Post 1 Response 2

    100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 1/31/2025

    Schroeder

    Legal, scientific, and ethical considerations can prevent polygraph examinations from being admissible as direct evidence in court. Legal considerations are the admissibility rules, legal precedent, and the changes for jury misinterpretation. For example, the Daubert standard clarified that polygraph testing does not meet scientific criteria for it to be valid and reliable for the courtroom—scientific considerations like physiological measures, lack of scientific consensus, and the control question technique.  Critics can argue that significant biases are an unreliable measure of the truth. Lastly, ethical considerations like informed consent, misuse of privacy, and abuse can pull into wrongful accusations. Polygraphs are not foolproof but can derive from flawed data.

    The reliability of the polygraph in investigative processes can be useful for investigators to evaluate the credibility of anyone involved from witnesses to suspects to victims. Their role in screening, recording, and monitoring can be used for those on parole. However, accuracy is always a concern. Using the polygraph as an interrogation tactic can pressure suspects to be more forthcoming if they feel as if the test will tell the truth if they don’t. Overall, polygraphs are not direct evidence, they can be used with caution to further guide investigations. “The instrument is based on the idea that ordinarily a person is under stress when telling a lie; therefore, physiological responses to psychological stimuli (the questions) are produced that can be detected and measured. They may be interpreted to mean that the subject is telling the truth, that he or she is lying, or the result may be inconclusive” (Osterburg, 2019, p.227).

    **## Post1response.docx**

    Post 1 Response 2

    100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 1/31/2025

    Schroeder

    Legal, scientific, and ethical considerations can prevent polygraph examinations from being admissible as direct evidence in court. Legal considerations are the admissibility rules, legal precedent, and the changes for jury misinterpretation. For example, the Daubert standard clarified that polygraph testing does not meet scientific criteria for it to be valid and reliable for the courtroom—scientific considerations like physiological measures, lack of scientific consensus, and the control question technique.  Critics can argue that significant biases are an unreliable measure of the truth. Lastly, ethical considerations like informed consent, misuse of privacy, and abuse can pull into wrongful accusations. Polygraphs are not foolproof but can derive from flawed data.

    The reliability of the polygraph in investigative processes can be useful for investigators to evaluate the credibility of anyone involved from witnesses to suspects to victims. Their role in screening, recording, and monitoring can be used for those on parole. However, accuracy is always a concern. Using the polygraph as an interrogation tactic can pressure suspects to be more forthcoming if they feel as if the test will tell the truth if they don’t. Overall, polygraphs are not direct evidence, they can be used with caution to further guide investigations. “The instrument is based on the idea that ordinarily a person is under stress when telling a lie; therefore, physiological responses to psychological stimuli (the questions) are produced that can be detected and measured. They may be interpreted to mean that the subject is telling the truth, that he or she is lying, or the result may be inconclusive” (Osterburg, 2019, p.227).

  • [Solved] Q1 R1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Post1response1.docx **## Post1response1.docx** Post 1 Response 1 100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/31/2025 William The admissibility of polygraph evidence in legal proceedings is complex, influenced by legal standards and scientific critique. In th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Post1response1.docx

    **## Post1response1.docx**

    Post 1 Response 1

    100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 1/31/2025

    William

    The admissibility of polygraph evidence in legal proceedings is complex, influenced by legal standards and scientific critique. In the United States, polygraph results are not universally accepted due to questions about their reliability and potential for prejudice. The decision often hinges on the presiding judge’s discretion, who must weigh the evidence’s probative value against its potential to mislead or confuse the jury. The Daubert standard, established by the Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., requires scientific evidence to be relevant and reliable, considering factors like testability, peer review, error rates, and general acceptance in the scientific community. Polygraph evidence frequently struggles to meet these criteria due to ongoing debate about its scientific validity. In some instances, polygraph results may be admitted under specific conditions agreed upon by both parties involved in a case. For example, in certain jurisdictions, polygraph evidence can be considered if both the prosecution and defense consent to its use before the test is administered. Even with such agreements, courts remain cautious, often instructing juries to consider the evidence with skepticism due to its controversial nature. The federal landscape concerning polygraph tests is marked by a cautious approach to their admissibility in court. Federal courts typically adhere to stringent standards for scientific evidence, guided by the Federal Rules of Evidence. Rule 702 emphasizes the necessity for expert testimony to be grounded in reliable principles and methods, a criterion that polygraph evidence often struggles to fulfill due to its contentious scientific foundations. The landmark case of United States v. Scheffer underscored the judiciary’s reluctance to accept polygraph evidence. The Supreme Court upheld a military rule that excluded polygraph results, citing their questionable reliability and potential to undermine the jury’s role in determining credibility. This decision reflects a broader federal hesitance to embrace polygraph tests without clear validation of their accuracy. Federal agencies occasionally utilize polygraphs outside the courtroom, particularly in employment screenings for sensitive positions. Agencies like the FBI and CIA may deploy polygraph examinations as part of their security protocols, although these results are not typically disclosed or used as direct evidence in legal proceedings. This duality highlights a nuanced federal stance, where polygraphs serve as tools for internal assessments rather than courtroom evidence. The admissibility of polygraph evidence varies significantly across states, reflecting a patchwork of legal standards and judicial interpretations. Some states, such as California, have taken a firm stance against admitting polygraph results, citing their dubious reliability and potential to mislead juries. This exclusion is often rooted in state-specific evidentiary rules that prioritize objective and scientifically validated methods. Conversely, states like New Mexico have adopted a more permissive approach, allowing polygraph results to be introduced as evidence, provided they meet specific standards of reliability and relevance. In these states, admissibility often hinges on the examiner’s qualifications and the test’s adherence to established protocols, which aim to enhance the overall credibility of the results. In states where polygraph evidence is conditionally accepted, its admission is often contingent upon a pre-trial hearing where the judge evaluates its potential impact on the proceedings. These hearings serve as a gatekeeping mechanism, ensuring that only evidence with substantial probative value is presented to the jury. Despite these variations, a common thread among states is the cautious treatment of polygraph evidence, reflecting broader concerns about its scientific underpinnings. The criteria for admitting polygraph evidence are influenced by varying legal standards that aim to ensure only reliable and relevant evidence is considered in judicial proceedings. The Frye test, originating from Frye v. United States, requires that scientific evidence be “generally accepted” by a significant portion of the relevant scientific community. This standard place a substantial burden on proponents of polygraph evidence, as the scientific community remains divided on its reliability. In courts applying the Daubert standard, judges act as gatekeepers, assessing the scientific validity of polygraph evidence through a multi-factor analysis. This includes examining whether the polygraph technique has been subjected to peer review, whether there are known rates of error, and whether the principles have been generally accepted by experts. The subjective nature of polygraph analysis often complicates its ability to meet these criteria, creating a challenging landscape for its proponents.

    **## Post1response1.docx**

    Post 1 Response 1

    100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 1/31/2025

    William

    The admissibility of polygraph evidence in legal proceedings is complex, influenced by legal standards and scientific critique. In the United States, polygraph results are not universally accepted due to questions about their reliability and potential for prejudice. The decision often hinges on the presiding judge’s discretion, who must weigh the evidence’s probative value against its potential to mislead or confuse the jury. The Daubert standard, established by the Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., requires scientific evidence to be relevant and reliable, considering factors like testability, peer review, error rates, and general acceptance in the scientific community. Polygraph evidence frequently struggles to meet these criteria due to ongoing debate about its scientific validity. In some instances, polygraph results may be admitted under specific conditions agreed upon by both parties involved in a case. For example, in certain jurisdictions, polygraph evidence can be considered if both the prosecution and defense consent to its use before the test is administered. Even with such agreements, courts remain cautious, often instructing juries to consider the evidence with skepticism due to its controversial nature. The federal landscape concerning polygraph tests is marked by a cautious approach to their admissibility in court. Federal courts typically adhere to stringent standards for scientific evidence, guided by the Federal Rules of Evidence. Rule 702 emphasizes the necessity for expert testimony to be grounded in reliable principles and methods, a criterion that polygraph evidence often struggles to fulfill due to its contentious scientific foundations. The landmark case of United States v. Scheffer underscored the judiciary’s reluctance to accept polygraph evidence. The Supreme Court upheld a military rule that excluded polygraph results, citing their questionable reliability and potential to undermine the jury’s role in determining credibility. This decision reflects a broader federal hesitance to embrace polygraph tests without clear validation of their accuracy. Federal agencies occasionally utilize polygraphs outside the courtroom, particularly in employment screenings for sensitive positions. Agencies like the FBI and CIA may deploy polygraph examinations as part of their security protocols, although these results are not typically disclosed or used as direct evidence in legal proceedings. This duality highlights a nuanced federal stance, where polygraphs serve as tools for internal assessments rather than courtroom evidence. The admissibility of polygraph evidence varies significantly across states, reflecting a patchwork of legal standards and judicial interpretations. Some states, such as California, have taken a firm stance against admitting polygraph results, citing their dubious reliability and potential to mislead juries. This exclusion is often rooted in state-specific evidentiary rules that prioritize objective and scientifically validated methods. Conversely, states like New Mexico have adopted a more permissive approach, allowing polygraph results to be introduced as evidence, provided they meet specific standards of reliability and relevance. In these states, admissibility often hinges on the examiner’s qualifications and the test’s adherence to established protocols, which aim to enhance the overall credibility of the results. In states where polygraph evidence is conditionally accepted, its admission is often contingent upon a pre-trial hearing where the judge evaluates its potential impact on the proceedings. These hearings serve as a gatekeeping mechanism, ensuring that only evidence with substantial probative value is presented to the jury. Despite these variations, a common thread among states is the cautious treatment of polygraph evidence, reflecting broader concerns about its scientific underpinnings. The criteria for admitting polygraph evidence are influenced by varying legal standards that aim to ensure only reliable and relevant evidence is considered in judicial proceedings. The Frye test, originating from Frye v. United States, requires that scientific evidence be “generally accepted” by a significant portion of the relevant scientific community. This standard place a substantial burden on proponents of polygraph evidence, as the scientific community remains divided on its reliability. In courts applying the Daubert standard, judges act as gatekeepers, assessing the scientific validity of polygraph evidence through a multi-factor analysis. This includes examining whether the polygraph technique has been subjected to peer review, whether there are known rates of error, and whether the principles have been generally accepted by experts. The subjective nature of polygraph analysis often complicates its ability to meet these criteria, creating a challenging landscape for its proponents.

  • [Solved] PowerPoint Presentation: Capital Budget Proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – To assess the need for a capital budget item. – To investigate the information needed to prepare a budget proposal. 1. Identify the capital budget item. 2. Identify the need and consequences if it is not purchased. 3. Identify the cost of the piece of equipment and if there are any alternative fun…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – To assess the need for a capital budget item.
    – To investigate the information needed to prepare a budget proposal.

    1. Identify the capital budget item.
    2. Identify the need and consequences if it is not purchased.
    3. Identify the cost of the piece of equipment and if there are any alternative funding sources.
    4. Presents a compelling argument for the purchase of the capital item

    – The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.
    – The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
    – The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
    – Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Patholdy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Describe and discuss the pathological conditions that might affect the sexual responses in older adults. – How and why do you think Nutritional factors, psychological factors, drugs and complementary and alternative medications affect the immune system in older adults. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Describe and discuss the pathological conditions that might affect the sexual responses in older adults.
    – How and why do you think Nutritional factors, psychological factors, drugs and complementary and alternative medications affect the immune system in older adults.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] OB WEEK 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    T.R. is a 45-year-old female patient who came to your office complaining of intermittent and bilateral clear nipple discharge for the last two weeks. She thinks is not related to manipulation of the breast but definitively increases with it. She notes that it comes from more than one duct. On health…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    T.R. is a 45-year-old female patient who came to your office complaining of intermittent and bilateral clear nipple discharge for the last two weeks. She thinks is not related to manipulation of the breast but definitively increases with it.

    She notes that it comes from more than one duct. On health history you documented that patient also has frequent headaches and she has noted some visual problems.

    R.T. is a 35-year-old female patient who was seen in the clinic because she has been trying to get pregnant for about 7 months but she has not been successful.

    Only positive gynecologic history for R.T. has been three episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease in the last five years.

    Woman comes in complaining of a breast mass she found on breast self-examination. You have performed a comprehensive assessment and conclude that it is benign.

    **Questions for the case**

    – Discuss the diagnostic test appropriate for T.R. and the rationale.
    – Discuss your presumptive diagnoses and ICD 10 number.
    – Develop the management plan (pharmacological and nonpharmacological).
    – Discuss three differential diagnoses for with ICD 10 numbers for each.

    Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case:

    1. **An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach maximal health potential on individuals.**
    2. **Name the different family developmental stages and give examples of each one.**
    3. **Describe family structure and function and the relationship with health care.**

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources WITHIN 5 YEARS

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ActiveLearningAssignmentWeek4.docx **## ActiveLearningAssignmentWeek4.docx** Active Learning Assignment Week 4 Top of Form Bottom of Form Active Learning Assignment Content **Submit the diagram of the problem from your place of work and the paper: which must be minim…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ActiveLearningAssignmentWeek4.docx

    **## ActiveLearningAssignmentWeek4.docx**

    Active Learning Assignment Week 4

    Top of Form

    Bottom of Form

    Active Learning Assignment Content

    **Submit the diagram of the problem from your place of work and the paper: which must be minimally 2 pages with an introduction and a conclusion. Please adhere to APA format to include headings within your paper- ensure you label your diagram correctly. Review Reference count requirement.** Utilizes at least 3 sources and all sources are current within 5 years. Cited following APA format.

    Bottom of Form

    Top of Form

    Question <bdi></bdi>

    Chapter 13 in our textbook

    **APPLYING EI TO CHANGE THE CULTURE OF PATIENT SAFETY**

    Changing a culture prone to medical error is one of the most difficult obstacles to improving patient safety. In the traditional safety culture, blame and judgment undermine reporting and systems improvement. A “fix-the-problem-not-the-blame” approach is at least articulated if not operationalized in most healthcare organizations.

    However, simply identifying risk management and quality improvement as a no-blame system is not enough to change a culture deeply ingrained in healthcare providers. The EIPS model may offer a way to change the blame culture (see Figure 13.5). For example, in the story presented, several clinical culture issues predisposed the unit to the error. Using Reason’s model, the culture created holes that made the flow from error to patient harm more likely, especially with the new employee orientation to the clinical unit.

    EI/Patient Safety (EIPS) Model.

    In this model, good communication skills improve EI skills and good EI skills improve communication. These two skill sets are in a positive feedback loop. If communication skills are poor, EI abilities can improve them. If communication is poor, safety is compromised, but as EI ability improves communication, this negative influence is mitigated via EI abilities.

    ![9780826174543_fig13_5](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/asssigment-20879999)

    Using the EIPS Model,
    **diagram a patient safety procedure on your unit [in other words- YOUR CURRENT PLACE OF WORK] that has an emotional or interpersonal “hole” in it**.

    Describe how one EI ability could be used to ameliorate that hole.

    **Submit the diagram of the problem from your place of work and the paper: which must be minimally 2 pages with an introduction and a conclusion. Please adhere to APA format to include headings within your paper- ensure you label your diagram correctly. Review Reference count requirement.** Utilizes at least 3 sources and all sources are current within 5 years. Cited following APA format.

    Bottom of Form

    ## image1.png

    **## ActiveLearningAssignmentWeek4.docx**

    Active Learning Assignment Week 4

    Top of Form

    Bottom of Form

    Active Learning Assignment Content

    **Submit the diagram of the problem from your place of work and the paper: which must be minimally 2 pages with an introduction and a conclusion. Please adhere to APA format to include headings within your paper- ensure you label your diagram correctly. Review Reference count requirement.** Utilizes at least 3 sources and all sources are current within 5 years. Cited following APA format.

    Bottom of Form

    Top of Form

    Question <bdi></bdi>

    Chapter 13 in our textbook

    **APPLYING EI TO CHANGE THE CULTURE OF PATIENT SAFETY**

    Changing a culture prone to medical error is one of the most difficult obstacles to improving patient safety. In the traditional safety culture, blame and judgment undermine reporting and systems improvement. A “fix-the-problem-not-the-blame” approach is at least articulated if not operationalized in most healthcare organizations.

    However, simply identifying risk management and quality improvement as a no-blame system is not enough to change a culture deeply ingrained in healthcare providers. The EIPS model may offer a way to change the blame culture (see Figure 13.5). For example, in the story presented, several clinical culture issues predisposed the unit to the error. Using Reason’s model, the culture created holes that made the flow from error to patient harm more likely, especially with the new employee orientation to the clinical unit.

    EI/Patient Safety (EIPS) Model.

    In this model, good communication skills improve EI skills and good EI skills improve communication. These two skill sets are in a positive feedback loop. If communication skills are poor, EI abilities can improve them. If communication is poor, safety is compromised, but as EI ability improves communication, this negative influence is mitigated via EI abilities.

    ![9780826174543_fig13_5](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/asssigment-20879999)

    Using the EIPS Model,
    **diagram a patient safety procedure on your unit [in other words- YOUR CURRENT PLACE OF WORK] that has an emotional or interpersonal “hole” in it**.

    Describe how one EI ability could be used to ameliorate that hole.

    **Submit the diagram of the problem from your place of work and the paper: which must be minimally 2 pages with an introduction and a conclusion. Please adhere to APA format to include headings within your paper- ensure you label your diagram correctly. Review Reference count requirement.** Utilizes at least 3 sources and all sources are current within 5 years. Cited following APA format.

    Bottom of Form

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Week2a

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## 304_Assignment2.docx **## 304_Assignment2.docx** | | | — | | **Cancer Public Service Announcement Project**<br>The local chapter of the American Cancer Society has learned that you are taking a Cancer Biology college course and have asked you to help them develop…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## 304_Assignment2.docx

    **## 304_Assignment2.docx**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Cancer Public  Service  Announcement Project**<br>The local chapter of the American Cancer Society has learned that you are taking a Cancer Biology college course and have asked you to help them develop a public service announcement. The goal of the announcement is to educate the general public on the biology of one specific type of cancer and to encourage people to get screened, look for signs themselves, or implement lifestyle changes that will reduce their chance of developing that specific type of cancer. <br>In this multi-step assignment, you will throughout the semester create a public service announcement brochure, article, poster, video, podcast, or narrated presentation.   <br>If you choose a video, podcast, or narrated presentation, you must also include a written script as part of your presentation. If a presentation or video is uploaded to YouTube (unlisted); you can download an automatically generated transcript – see more information below.  <br>This assignment addresses the following course outcomes: <br>· Identify properties involved in maintaining homeostasis in order to recognize how certain factors contribute to cancer.<br>· Recognize the complexity of cancer and assess current approaches for screening, diagnosis, and treatment in order to adopt appropriate lifestyle strategies.<br>· Apply knowledge of causes, development, and progression of cancer to ask questions and make informed decisions about personal and public health. |
    | **Step 3:  Submit an Outline Week 5**<br>The outline should be in alphanumeric format with numbers for the main sections and letters for the sublevels under each main section/level (the outline should not be a draft with full sentences and paragraphs). The more tiers/levels and supportive details you include in the outline, the more you will likely benefit from the feedback.    <br>Include at least one numbered main tier/level for each of the required sections of the service announcement (introduction, genetic/environmental factors, development/progression, screening/diagnosis/treatment, public health, conclusion). Include enough lettered sublevels for each main tier/level to clearly outline what you plan to include in each section. Depending on the section, enough sublevels for each main level may vary, for some two may be enough, and for others, you may include five or more. You may also include additional levels of supportive detail when that is beneficial.     <br>If you would like feedback on the images you plan to use. you can include them in the outline document as well (Optional).  <br>Here are some resources that you may find helpful when writing your outline:   <br>[How to Build an Alphanumeric Outline](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAAgVKNtZJE) (video)  <br> <br>· UMGC (2021) Prewriting and Outlining. <br>[Prewriting and Outlining](https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writing-resources/prewriting/prewriting-and-outlining)<br>· UMGC (2021) Online Guide to Writing. <br>[Using Your Outline as a Note and Research Trap](https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/online-guide-to-writing/tutorial/chapter2/ch2-11.html)<br>Example (the number of levels and sublevels below each main level/section will vary):   <br>1. Introduction  <br>1. <br>A. first item or topic that will be covered in the introduction <br>B. second item/topic  <br>etc.  <br>2. Genetic and Environmental Factors  <br>1. <br>A. first item/topic  <br>1. supportive detail<br>2. supportive detail  <br>etc.  <br>B. second item/topic  <br>1. supportive detail<br>2. supportive detail  <br>etc.   <br>**_Important:_** If you use a <br>**Generative AI tool** to assist you with this assignment, it must be acknowledged. Please review the statement about Generative AI use under Academic Policies in the syllabus, and the <br>[UMGC Artificial Intelligence Guide](https://libguides.umgc.edu/artificial-intelligence), especially in regard to the importance of acknowledgement and citation. The large majority of your assignment must be your own work, and any Gen AI output incorporated into the assignment must be cited as such. An important aspect of responsible AI use, and academic integrity, is honesty. Your own voice, your own thoughts, and supportive detail from each of the information sources cited, should be evident throughout all your submitted work. |
    | **Due in Week 7**(included for required information needed when preparing the outline): <br> <br>**Step 4: Submit Public Service Announcement**<br>Regardless of the chosen format, your public service announcement should contain the following information:  <br>· Introduction: Share a few statistics about the chosen type of cancer and introduce what will be covered.   <br>· Describe the known genetic and environmental factors that cause this type of cancer. Include details about genes, inherited and spontaneous mutations, proteins, hormones, and known carcinogens that are involved with the development of this type of cancer.  <br>· Using your knowledge of cancer cell and tissue biology, describe the development and progression of this type of cancer.  <br>· Discuss the current approach for screening, diagnosis, and treatment for this type of cancer. Include either an explanation of how one type of treatment works at the cellular level or discuss an emerging innovative approach to treatment.  <br>· Discuss what can be done from a public health perspective, and from an individual perspective, to reduce the risks associated with the development of this type of cancer.  <br>· Conclusion <br>· A minimum of 5 informative and relevant images are required, regardless of the chosen format. More than 5 is fine. These images should be referred to in the text and/or narration and should be explained as needed. Include the source below each image (just the url is enough). See suggestion for type of images under Step 2. <br>· References in <br>[APA format](https://libguides.umgc.edu/apa-examples). <br> <br>· Length Requirement: 1200-1800 words  (for the article, brochure, or narration transcript – fewer words on the slides themselves for the presentation option). <br>· Mechanics and organization of content will account for 10% of the assignment grade. <br>Your announcement should be fully paraphrased in your own words, with your own writing style, and structure. Changing just a few words in a sentence is not fully paraphrasing. <br>Use in-text citations within your assignment and a reference list at the end. Text from outside sources either needs to be fully paraphrased in your own writing style (in-text citation is still needed), or needs quotation marks around the copied text, plus an in-text citation after. There should be a minimal need for direct quotes in this assignment (less than 10%).<br>Remember that your audience is the public. Although you may be using some technical information resources you should explain everything so that people who have not completed BIOL 304, or attended college, can understand it.  <br>**Submit** your public service announcement to the assignment folder by the due date listed in the syllabus.  <br> <br>**Submission formats:**<br>· Submit a narrated presentation as an unlisted YouTube link (see instructions below), and a written transcript in a Word document.   <br>· Submit a popular science article or a scientific brochure as a Word, PowerPoint, or PDF file.   <br>**Turnitin:** The originality of your assignment will be checked with Turnitin. Please review the originality report, and if needed, submit a revised assignment before the submission deadline. <br> <br>If you need help accessing and understanding the Turnitin Report, please use this resource:  <br>[UMGC Turnitin FAQ](https://libguides.umgc.edu/turnitin-students) |

    **## 304_Assignment2.docx**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Cancer Public  Service  Announcement Project**<br>The local chapter of the American Cancer Society has learned that you are taking a Cancer Biology college course and have asked you to help them develop a public service announcement. The goal of the announcement is to educate the general public on the biology of one specific type of cancer and to encourage people to get screened, look for signs themselves, or implement lifestyle changes that will reduce their chance of developing that specific type of cancer. <br>In this multi-step assignment, you will throughout the semester create a public service announcement brochure, article, poster, video, podcast, or narrated presentation.   <br>If you choose a video, podcast, or narrated presentation, you must also include a written script as part of your presentation. If a presentation or video is uploaded to YouTube (unlisted); you can download an automatically generated transcript – see more information below.  <br>This assignment addresses the following course outcomes: <br>· Identify properties involved in maintaining homeostasis in order to recognize how certain factors contribute to cancer.<br>· Recognize the complexity of cancer and assess current approaches for screening, diagnosis, and treatment in order to adopt appropriate lifestyle strategies.<br>· Apply knowledge of causes, development, and progression of cancer to ask questions and make informed decisions about personal and public health. |
    | **Step 3:  Submit an Outline Week 5**<br>The outline should be in alphanumeric format with numbers for the main sections and letters for the sublevels under each main section/level (the outline should not be a draft with full sentences and paragraphs). The more tiers/levels and supportive details you include in the outline, the more you will likely benefit from the feedback.    <br>Include at least one numbered main tier/level for each of the required sections of the service announcement (introduction, genetic/environmental factors, development/progression, screening/diagnosis/treatment, public health, conclusion). Include enough lettered sublevels for each main tier/level to clearly outline what you plan to include in each section. Depending on the section, enough sublevels for each main level may vary, for some two may be enough, and for others, you may include five or more. You may also include additional levels of supportive detail when that is beneficial.     <br>If you would like feedback on the images you plan to use. you can include them in the outline document as well (Optional).  <br>Here are some resources that you may find helpful when writing your outline:   <br>[How to Build an Alphanumeric Outline](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAAgVKNtZJE) (video)  <br> <br>· UMGC (2021) Prewriting and Outlining. <br>[Prewriting and Outlining](https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writing-resources/prewriting/prewriting-and-outlining)<br>· UMGC (2021) Online Guide to Writing. <br>[Using Your Outline as a Note and Research Trap](https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/online-guide-to-writing/tutorial/chapter2/ch2-11.html)<br>Example (the number of levels and sublevels below each main level/section will vary):   <br>1. Introduction  <br>1. <br>A. first item or topic that will be covered in the introduction <br>B. second item/topic  <br>etc.  <br>2. Genetic and Environmental Factors  <br>1. <br>A. first item/topic  <br>1. supportive detail<br>2. supportive detail  <br>etc.  <br>B. second item/topic  <br>1. supportive detail<br>2. supportive detail  <br>etc.   <br>**_Important:_** If you use a <br>**Generative AI tool** to assist you with this assignment, it must be acknowledged. Please review the statement about Generative AI use under Academic Policies in the syllabus, and the <br>[UMGC Artificial Intelligence Guide](https://libguides.umgc.edu/artificial-intelligence), especially in regard to the importance of acknowledgement and citation. The large majority of your assignment must be your own work, and any Gen AI output incorporated into the assignment must be cited as such. An important aspect of responsible AI use, and academic integrity, is honesty. Your own voice, your own thoughts, and supportive detail from each of the information sources cited, should be evident throughout all your submitted work. |
    | **Due in Week 7**(included for required information needed when preparing the outline): <br> <br>**Step 4: Submit Public Service Announcement**<br>Regardless of the chosen format, your public service announcement should contain the following information:  <br>· Introduction: Share a few statistics about the chosen type of cancer and introduce what will be covered.   <br>· Describe the known genetic and environmental factors that cause this type of cancer. Include details about genes, inherited and spontaneous mutations, proteins, hormones, and known carcinogens that are involved with the development of this type of cancer.  <br>· Using your knowledge of cancer cell and tissue biology, describe the development and progression of this type of cancer.  <br>· Discuss the current approach for screening, diagnosis, and treatment for this type of cancer. Include either an explanation of how one type of treatment works at the cellular level or discuss an emerging innovative approach to treatment.  <br>· Discuss what can be done from a public health perspective, and from an individual perspective, to reduce the risks associated with the development of this type of cancer.  <br>· Conclusion <br>· A minimum of 5 informative and relevant images are required, regardless of the chosen format. More than 5 is fine. These images should be referred to in the text and/or narration and should be explained as needed. Include the source below each image (just the url is enough). See suggestion for type of images under Step 2. <br>· References in <br>[APA format](https://libguides.umgc.edu/apa-examples). <br> <br>· Length Requirement: 1200-1800 words  (for the article, brochure, or narration transcript – fewer words on the slides themselves for the presentation option). <br>· Mechanics and organization of content will account for 10% of the assignment grade. <br>Your announcement should be fully paraphrased in your own words, with your own writing style, and structure. Changing just a few words in a sentence is not fully paraphrasing. <br>Use in-text citations within your assignment and a reference list at the end. Text from outside sources either needs to be fully paraphrased in your own writing style (in-text citation is still needed), or needs quotation marks around the copied text, plus an in-text citation after. There should be a minimal need for direct quotes in this assignment (less than 10%).<br>Remember that your audience is the public. Although you may be using some technical information resources you should explain everything so that people who have not completed BIOL 304, or attended college, can understand it.  <br>**Submit** your public service announcement to the assignment folder by the due date listed in the syllabus.  <br> <br>**Submission formats:**<br>· Submit a narrated presentation as an unlisted YouTube link (see instructions below), and a written transcript in a Word document.   <br>· Submit a popular science article or a scientific brochure as a Word, PowerPoint, or PDF file.   <br>**Turnitin:** The originality of your assignment will be checked with Turnitin. Please review the originality report, and if needed, submit a revised assignment before the submission deadline. <br> <br>If you need help accessing and understanding the Turnitin Report, please use this resource:  <br>[UMGC Turnitin FAQ](https://libguides.umgc.edu/turnitin-students) |

  • [Solved] biology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering biology.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.