My Blog

Tag: Pathophysiology & Pharmacology

  • [Solved] Mood Stabilzer

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## MoodStabilizer.docx **## MoodStabilizer.docx** Mood Stabilizer This Assignment is designed to help you analyze the many considerations for prescribing mood stabilizers, as well as organizing the many different lab components to consider when prescribing to a patient….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## MoodStabilizer.docx

    **## MoodStabilizer.docx**

    Mood Stabilizer

    This Assignment is designed to help you analyze the many considerations for prescribing mood stabilizers, as well as organizing the many different lab components to consider when prescribing to a patient.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/145150/modules/items/5659727)

    To Prepare

    · Review the Required Learning Resources.

    · Review indications and considerations for
    _traditional_ mood stabilizer psychopharmacology treatments, including carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products.

    The Assignment

    Construct a 5- to 6-page paper discussing each of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications: carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products. Support your answers with
    **five (5)** evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly literature.

    **Note:** APA style format will apply.

    Your paper should include the following for each:

    · Proposed mechanism of action

    · Baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing labs and assessments

    **Note:** Discuss the importance of assessment and labs.

    · Special population considerations (birth assigned gender, age, other medical comorbidity considerations)

    · FDA approval indications

    · Typical dosing with discussion on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use

    · Major drug–drug interaction considerations

    · For each of these medications, please review potential drug–drug interactions listed below. Consider alternative dosing schedules, clinical implications for the drug interactions, additional patient education needed, any additional monitoring recommended, or collaboration needed with other medical professions (such as, primary care providers)

    · Lamotrigine + Valproate

    · Lamotrigine + Rifampin

    · Valproate + Estrogen containing birth control.

    · Valproate + Amitriptyline

    · Lithium + Furosemide

    · Lithium + Lisinopril

    · Carbamazepine + Lurasidone

    · Carbamazepine + Grapefruit juice

    · Discuss the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy for patients.

    **Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. For this Assignment, you are only required to include a title page. The
    [Walden Writing Center Sample PaperLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general) provides an example of those required elements.

    By Day 7 of Week 8

    **Submit** by
    **Day 7 of Week 8**.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor each of the four (4) traditional mood stabilizers, response includes proposed mechanism of action, baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing. Discusses the importance of assessment and labs. Indication of special population considerations FDA approval. Discusses typical dosing with focus on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use of major drug-drug interaction considerations. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **50 to >36.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response comprehensively and clearly describes all of the elements for each of the four (4) mood stabilizers. | **36 to >24.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response clearly describes at least 75% the Assignment elements for three to four (3–4) mood stabilizers. | **24 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response describes at least 50% the Assignment elements for each mood stabilizer or only two (2) mood stabilizers discussed. | **11 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that describe 25% or less of the Assignment elements for one (1) mood stabilizer, or some or all are missing. | | 50 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReviews the potential drug–drug interactions of the following: *Lamotrigine + Valproate; *Lamotrigine + Rifampin; *Valproate + Estrogen containing birth control; *Valproate + Amitriptyline; *Lithium + Furosemide; *Lithium + Lisinopril; *Carbamazepine + Lurasidone; *Carbamazepine + Grapefruit juice. Consider alternative dosing schedules, clinical implications for the drug interactions, additional patient education needed, any additional monitoring recommended, or collaboration needed with other medical professionals. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **20 to >18.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reviews all seven to eight (7-8) of the potential drug-drug interactions with clear and accurate Discussion of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate. | **18 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reviews five to six (5–6) of the potential drug-drug interactions with clear and accurate Discussion of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate. | **15 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reviews three to four (3–4) of the potential drug-drug interactions with some Discussion and minor inaccuracies of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate. | **10 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reviews up to eight (8) of the potential drug-drug interactions with vague and major inaccuracies noted in the Discussion, including alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate. | | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscusses ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing these medications to patients. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response accurately and clearly discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the Discussion. | **7 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response accurately discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the Discussion. | **4 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response inaccurately or vaguely discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the Discussion. | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response inaccurately and vaguely discusses ethical, legal and social implications, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the Discussion, or it is missing. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe paper is succinct and is 5–6 pages. Five (5) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The paper is succinct and is 5–6 pages. Five (5) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The paper is succinct and is 7–8 pages. Four (4) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The paper is somewhat succinct and is 8–9 pages. Two or three (2 or 3) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The paper is not succinct and is 10+ pages. One (1) or no evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is vague or off topic. | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct APA format with no errors. | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one or two APA format errors. | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three or four APA format errors. | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains five or more APA format errors. | | 5 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    **## MoodStabilizer.docx**

    Mood Stabilizer

    This Assignment is designed to help you analyze the many considerations for prescribing mood stabilizers, as well as organizing the many different lab components to consider when prescribing to a patient.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/145150/modules/items/5659727)

    To Prepare

    · Review the Required Learning Resources.

    · Review indications and considerations for
    _traditional_ mood stabilizer psychopharmacology treatments, including carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products.

    The Assignment

    Construct a 5- to 6-page paper discussing each of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications: carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products. Support your answers with
    **five (5)** evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly literature.

    **Note:** APA style format will apply.

    Your paper should include the following for each:

    · Proposed mechanism of action

    · Baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing labs and assessments

    **Note:** Discuss the importance of assessment and labs.

    · Special population considerations (birth assigned gender, age, other medical comorbidity considerations)

    · FDA approval indications

    · Typical dosing with discussion on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use

    · Major drug–drug interaction considerations

    · For each of these medications, please review potential drug–drug interactions listed below. Consider alternative dosing schedules, clinical implications for the drug interactions, additional patient education needed, any additional monitoring recommended, or collaboration needed with other medical professions (such as, primary care providers)

    · Lamotrigine + Valproate

    · Lamotrigine + Rifampin

    · Valproate + Estrogen containing birth control.

    · Valproate + Amitriptyline

    · Lithium + Furosemide

    · Lithium + Lisinopril

    · Carbamazepine + Lurasidone

    · Carbamazepine + Grapefruit juice

    · Discuss the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy for patients.

    **Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. For this Assignment, you are only required to include a title page. The
    [Walden Writing Center Sample PaperLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general) provides an example of those required elements.

    By Day 7 of Week 8

    **Submit** by
    **Day 7 of Week 8**.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor each of the four (4) traditional mood stabilizers, response includes proposed mechanism of action, baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing. Discusses the importance of assessment and labs. Indication of special population considerations FDA approval. Discusses typical dosing with focus on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use of major drug-drug interaction considerations. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **50 to >36.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response comprehensively and clearly describes all of the elements for each of the four (4) mood stabilizers. | **36 to >24.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response clearly describes at least 75% the Assignment elements for three to four (3–4) mood stabilizers. | **24 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response describes at least 50% the Assignment elements for each mood stabilizer or only two (2) mood stabilizers discussed. | **11 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that describe 25% or less of the Assignment elements for one (1) mood stabilizer, or some or all are missing. | | 50 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReviews the potential drug–drug interactions of the following: *Lamotrigine + Valproate; *Lamotrigine + Rifampin; *Valproate + Estrogen containing birth control; *Valproate + Amitriptyline; *Lithium + Furosemide; *Lithium + Lisinopril; *Carbamazepine + Lurasidone; *Carbamazepine + Grapefruit juice. Consider alternative dosing schedules, clinical implications for the drug interactions, additional patient education needed, any additional monitoring recommended, or collaboration needed with other medical professionals. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **20 to >18.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Reviews all seven to eight (7-8) of the potential drug-drug interactions with clear and accurate Discussion of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate. | **18 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Reviews five to six (5–6) of the potential drug-drug interactions with clear and accurate Discussion of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate. | **15 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Reviews three to four (3–4) of the potential drug-drug interactions with some Discussion and minor inaccuracies of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate. | **10 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Reviews up to eight (8) of the potential drug-drug interactions with vague and major inaccuracies noted in the Discussion, including alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate. | | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscusses ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing these medications to patients. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response accurately and clearly discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the Discussion. | **7 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response accurately discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the Discussion. | **4 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response inaccurately or vaguely discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the Discussion. | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response inaccurately and vaguely discusses ethical, legal and social implications, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the Discussion, or it is missing. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe paper is succinct and is 5–6 pages. Five (5) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The paper is succinct and is 5–6 pages. Five (5) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The paper is succinct and is 7–8 pages. Four (4) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The paper is somewhat succinct and is 8–9 pages. Two or three (2 or 3) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The paper is not succinct and is 10+ pages. One (1) or no evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is vague or off topic. | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct APA format with no errors. | **4 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one or two APA format errors. | **3 to >1.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three or four APA format errors. | **1 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains five or more APA format errors. | | 5 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

  • [Solved] Mod.7 Assingment/APA STYLE/Turnitin-Plagiarism FREE-Theo

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**Critical Research Appraisal Assignment**_ #### **Goal:** You will critically appraise a research design #### **Content Requirements:** You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design and answer the following questions regarding the following categori…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**Critical Research Appraisal Assignment**_

    #### **Goal:**

    You will critically appraise a research design

    #### **Content Requirements:**

    You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories:

    1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research
    – Briefly, describe the characteristics of qualitative research and identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a qualitative research approach.
    – Compare and contrast three different qualitative research methodologies.
    – Briefly, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research evidence for informing nursing practice.
    – Communicate how this research design used in research.
    2. The study, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigor, findings and limitations
    – Identify the purpose of the study.
    – Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.
    – Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
    – Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.
    – Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.
    – Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
    – Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
    – Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.
    – Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.
    – Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.
    – Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.
    3. Discuss what you understand by the term Quantitative Research – Use the following dot points to guide your discussion (give reasons for your argument and support with references):
    – Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.
    – Identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a quantitative research approach
    – Differentiate between observational and interventional research designs and also between experimental and quasi-experimental designs.
    – Briefly, outline the difference between inferential and descriptive statistics and their relationship to levels of measurement.
    – Communicate how this research design used in research.
    4. Critique the Quantitative Research Report – Use the following headings to guide your critique (in all discussions and explanations give reasons for your argument and support with references):
    – The study
    – Identify the purpose and design of the study.
    – Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.
    – Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
    –  Sampling
    – Explain the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.
    – Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
    – Data collection
    – Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).
    – Define the terms validity and reliability and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.
    – Data analysis
    – Outline how the data were analyzed.
    – Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
    – Findings and limitations
    – Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study
    – Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.

    #### **Submission Instructions:**

    – Clear and concise, no improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
    – Formatted per current APA and 4-5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
    – Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) _scholarly journal articles_  or _primary legal sources_ (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Mod.5 PowerPAssingment/APA STYLE/Turnitin-Plagiarism FREE-Theo

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice**_ #### **Goal:** The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a framework for a future evidence-based project #### **Content Requirements:** 1. Review literature regarding is…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice**_

    #### **Goal:**

    The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a framework for a future evidence-based project

    #### **Content Requirements:**

    1. Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice nursing.
    2. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice nursing.
    3. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.
    4. Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice
    5. Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or model.

    #### **Submission Instructions:**

    – The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.
    – The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
    – The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA guidelines and references should be current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
    – Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA guidelines (the library has a copy of the 7th Edition APA Manual)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Mod.4 Discussion/APA STYLE/Turnitin-Plagiarism FREE-Theo

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**Theories & Conceptual Models**_ Evaluate theories and conceptual models from nursing and related fields for use in advanced nursing practice. **Assignment Requirements*** – Should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources/re…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**Theories & Conceptual Models**_

    Evaluate theories and conceptual models from nursing and related fields for use in advanced nursing practice.

    **Assignment Requirements***

    – Should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources/references within past 5 years. Reviewed on TURNITIN, no repeat work.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Mod.3 Discussion/APA STYLE/Turnitin-Plagiarism FREE-Theo

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care**_ Which learning theories and principles do you think are most useful to the advanced practice nurse (APN) in providing high quality health care to clients, and why? **Assignment Requirements*** – Should be at least 500 words, formatted…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care**_

    Which learning theories and principles do you think are most useful to the advanced practice nurse (APN) in providing high quality health care to clients, and why?

    **Assignment Requirements***

    – Should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources/references within past 5 years. Reviewed on TURNITIN, no repeat work.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] LEADING PERSON CARE

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Part 1: Case Scenario** Create a case scenario for a patient who experiences transitions across three points of healthcare delivery. For example, a patient who is admitted through the Emergency Department rushed to surgery and transferred to the surgical intensive care unit; or a patient who trans…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Part 1: Case Scenario** Create a case scenario for a patient who experiences transitions across three points of healthcare delivery. For example, a patient who is admitted through the Emergency Department rushed to surgery and transferred to the surgical intensive care unit; or a patient who transitions from an assisted living facility to the hospital and then to a long-term acute care facility. These are just two examples; however, you can be creative as you create the case scenario.The case scenario should be 2 **pages, double-spaced**, in length. The **case scenario should come immediately after the title page** in your assignment. Be sure to include the following:

    – Details regarding the patient and related health concerns
    – Description of transition across three specific points of care delivery (such as described above)
    – Integration of at least two principles of care coordination demonstrated by nurse leader(s) within the scenario

    **Part 2: In** a **2 pages**, address the elements below. Use a minimum of **4** peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within **5** years, to support your work.

    **See the rubric for specific, required content criteria within each section of the paper:**

    1. Provide an introduction to the paper.

    2. Explain the transitions in point-of-care delivery portrayed within the case scenario. Discuss the variables that could impact safety, quality, and continuity of care for the transitions described.Identify **one** specific patient outcome for **each** transition that occurs, and explain why that outcome is appropriate. Identify **one** evidence-based strategy to support outcome achievement and person-centered care for **each** transition that occurs.

    3. Discuss the role of the nurse leader to assure safe, high-quality, person-centered care across the points of care delivery described in the case scenario. Identify and apply at least two principles for care coordination to assure safe, high-quality, person-centered care as portrayed in the case scenario.

    4. Provide a conclusion to the paper.

    #### Assignment Instructions:

    Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.

    1. **Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.**
    2. The title page, pagination, subheadings, the body of the paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the most current edition of the manual.
    3. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.
    4. **No more than one short, direct quote (15 words or less) may be used in this assignment.**
    5. **First-person should not be used within this assignment.**

    **TOTAL 4 PAGESNO PLAGIO MORE THAN 5 % ALLOWEDDUE DATE JANUARY 15, 2025**

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] OB Clinical WK 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**Weekly Clinical Experience 1- OBGYN**_ Describe your clinical experience for this week. – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**Weekly Clinical Experience 1- OBGYN**_

    Describe your clinical experience for this week.

    – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
    – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
    – Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
    – What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
    – Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
    – academic sources must be within 5 years. No later than 2020.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Week2 : Appraisal of Quantitative Research

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Use the Galen library database to find one **primary** quantitative research article on any **nursing** topic recently published **this year** in a **nursing journal**. Read the article and in **one** paragraph (7 to 8 sentences) provide a rapid critical appraisal by answering the following question…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Use the Galen library database to find one **primary** quantitative research article on any **nursing** topic recently published **this year** in a **nursing journal**. Read the article and in **one** paragraph (7 to 8 sentences) provide a rapid critical appraisal by answering the following questions. _**Support your response by citing and referencing the research article.**_

    1. What was the research design?
    2. Was the sampling method and size appropriate for the research question? Explain.
    3. What were the dependent and independent (outcome) variables?
    4. Were valid and reliable instruments/surveys used to measure outcomes? Explain.
    5. What were the main results of the study?
    6. Was there statistical significance? Explain.
    7. How would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Unit 2 IP: Health Information Systems, Standards, Policy, and Information Governance

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Description -** **Note:** Use APA 7th style, and cite at least 2 scholarly references published within the last 5 years. Write 3–4 pgs, not including the title, abstract, and reference pgs, that address the following: As the manager of the CTU Health Care Information Systems Department, complete t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Description -** **Note:** Use APA 7th style, and cite at least 2 scholarly references published within the last 5 years.

    Write 3–4 pgs, not including the title, abstract, and reference pgs, that address the following:

    As the manager of the CTU Health Care Information Systems Department, complete the following:

    – Discuss how you would go about implementing a health information technology (HIT) strategic plan for data security, privacy, and quality management for your organization.
    – Discuss why the steering committee is very important for the success of the HIT strategic plan, and explain who should be included on the steering committee and why.
    – There are seven major elements that must be included in a strategic plan for it to be successful. Discuss how you would incorporate 3 of the seven elements if you were to develop a plan, and discuss which departments would be included on the steering committee and why.
    – For example, if reducing medical errors is a major priority for the organization, then this goal must be reflected in the priorities for the HIT development, paying attention to medical records, clinical protocols, and clinical decision support systems (CDSSs).

    **Elements of a strategic plan include the following:**

    – **Statement of corporate goals and objectives**
    – **Statement of HIT goals and objectives**
    – **Priorities for the application portfolio**
    – **Specifications of overall HIT architecture and infrastructure**
    – **Software development plan**
    – **HIT management and staffing**
    – **Statement of resource requirement**

    – 2 years ago