My Blog

Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Project Plan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Amazon( e-commerc) project plan will be done solo. \ IMG_0433.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0433-jpeg-10408175 "IMG_0433.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Amazon( e-commerc)
    project plan will be done solo.
    \
    IMG_0433.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0433-jpeg-10408175 "IMG_0433.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Sociology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Your readings discuss the “shared responsibility” debate. I have two links below for you to check out. The links concern events surrounding female rocker Chrissie Hynde from a few years ago. Read the story link first and then watch the video. According to your readings, what does the shared responsi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Your readings discuss the “shared responsibility” debate. I have two links below for you to check out. The links concern events surrounding female rocker Chrissie Hynde from a few years ago. Read the story link first and then watch the video. According to your readings, what does the shared responsibility debate involve? What do you agree with that the commentators say in the video and what do you disagree with? Overall, what is your stance on “shared responsibility?” Do you think organizations as well as individuals should be aware of the concept? Use information from the readings to help me understand your position.

  • [Solved] law enforcement admin

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering law enforcement admin.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] webpage

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    read wellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll – ## Untitleddocument.docx **## Untitleddocument.docx** **READ WELL, THIS IS CHALLENGING TO ME (I have added little notes throughout okay)** **How can we do this? Do we need to create an email account? I cannot give my personal information tho…. Please…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    read wellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

    – ## Untitleddocument.docx

    **## Untitleddocument.docx**

    **READ WELL, THIS IS CHALLENGING TO ME (I have added little notes throughout okay)**

    **How can we do this? Do we need to create an email account? I cannot give my personal information tho…. Please read this and see if you can do it…. Is it possible to do it with a tutor? I will also edit it and add my personal information, just tell me where and what.**

    1.
    **Webpage Creation** – Create a webpage to implement with students/stakeholders to communicate information, including a Web Quest activity. If you have the website previously created, you may use that for this assignment. You want it to include information about your classroom – expectations, future events, helpful tips for parents, etc. You may want to add a classroom calendar, or a place where parents can ask questions – (Just some thoughts).

    I have researched free webpage sites and WiX seems like the best one. It is easy to follow and work in.
    [https://www.wix.com/mystunningwebsites/illustration?utm_source=affiliate&utm_medium=paid_referral&utm_campaign=af_vergleichsieger.de&experiment_id=cake_92853447^486](https://www.wix.com/mystunningwebsites/illustration?utm_source=affiliate&utm_medium=paid_referral&utm_campaign=af_vergleichsieger.de&experiment_id=cake_92853447%5E486)

    I have created a simple page that is below the instruction tab (I cannot add it because it contain the professor and the school information)

    2.
    **Web Quest –** Create a Web Quest and post it on your webpage. (I also have to submit this separately) so i need as well

    What is a Web Quest?

    A Web Quest is
    **an assignment students complete using the Internet to research a specific topic**. A Web Quest can be printed on paper, presented in a PowerPoint, or on the Internet itself.

    Here is a website that explains how to create a Web Quest:
    [https://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech/tech011.shtml](https://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech/tech011.shtml)

    Use an existing lesson plan (if you have one) – create the Web Quest activity that you can use as part of that lesson plan. This activity DOES NOT need to be elaborate or complex.

    Include:

    1. The Topic – (Make it what the lesson plan is about if that is easiest).

    2. The task – (Make this a simple task that doesn’t require much set up by you).

    3. The Process – (Include the role your students will take to complete the quest – Or the instructions if they are doing it by themselves).

    4. The Resources – (You only need to include 3 resources. You can do more, but 3 will be enough for this assignment).

    5. The Evaluation – (Create a simple rubric).

    Put the Web Quest onto your webpage. If you already have a webpage – upload the Web Quest onto that. Share the site with others in the discussion forum.
    **Upload a simple explanation(1-2 paragraphs) of the Web Quest on a word doc along with the URL onto the Assignment tab (please do this part as well)**

    **And write three comments of other students assignment i will review (4-5 sentences) just pretend as if you are commenting on my work you just did, no write or wrong answer**

    **## Untitleddocument.docx**

    **READ WELL, THIS IS CHALLENGING TO ME (I have added little notes throughout okay)**

    **How can we do this? Do we need to create an email account? I cannot give my personal information tho…. Please read this and see if you can do it…. Is it possible to do it with a tutor? I will also edit it and add my personal information, just tell me where and what.**

    1.
    **Webpage Creation** – Create a webpage to implement with students/stakeholders to communicate information, including a Web Quest activity. If you have the website previously created, you may use that for this assignment. You want it to include information about your classroom – expectations, future events, helpful tips for parents, etc. You may want to add a classroom calendar, or a place where parents can ask questions – (Just some thoughts).

    I have researched free webpage sites and WiX seems like the best one. It is easy to follow and work in.
    [https://www.wix.com/mystunningwebsites/illustration?utm_source=affiliate&utm_medium=paid_referral&utm_campaign=af_vergleichsieger.de&experiment_id=cake_92853447^486](https://www.wix.com/mystunningwebsites/illustration?utm_source=affiliate&utm_medium=paid_referral&utm_campaign=af_vergleichsieger.de&experiment_id=cake_92853447%5E486)

    I have created a simple page that is below the instruction tab (I cannot add it because it contain the professor and the school information)

    2.
    **Web Quest –** Create a Web Quest and post it on your webpage. (I also have to submit this separately) so i need as well

    What is a Web Quest?

    A Web Quest is
    **an assignment students complete using the Internet to research a specific topic**. A Web Quest can be printed on paper, presented in a PowerPoint, or on the Internet itself.

    Here is a website that explains how to create a Web Quest:
    [https://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech/tech011.shtml](https://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech/tech011.shtml)

    Use an existing lesson plan (if you have one) – create the Web Quest activity that you can use as part of that lesson plan. This activity DOES NOT need to be elaborate or complex.

    Include:

    1. The Topic – (Make it what the lesson plan is about if that is easiest).

    2. The task – (Make this a simple task that doesn’t require much set up by you).

    3. The Process – (Include the role your students will take to complete the quest – Or the instructions if they are doing it by themselves).

    4. The Resources – (You only need to include 3 resources. You can do more, but 3 will be enough for this assignment).

    5. The Evaluation – (Create a simple rubric).

    Put the Web Quest onto your webpage. If you already have a webpage – upload the Web Quest onto that. Share the site with others in the discussion forum.
    **Upload a simple explanation(1-2 paragraphs) of the Web Quest on a word doc along with the URL onto the Assignment tab (please do this part as well)**

    **And write three comments of other students assignment i will review (4-5 sentences) just pretend as if you are commenting on my work you just did, no write or wrong answer**

  • [Solved] Hi

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Hi.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ResearchCritique3.docx **## ResearchCritique3.docx** **Research Critique 3** **Assignment Overview** This assignment is designed for nurse practitioner (NP) students to enhance skills in evidence-based practice by critically evaluating quantitative research. You will select and critique a prima…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ResearchCritique3.docx

    **## ResearchCritique3.docx**

    **Research Critique 3**

    **Assignment Overview**

    This assignment is designed for nurse practitioner (NP) students to enhance skills in evidence-based practice by critically evaluating quantitative research. You will select and critique a primary quantitative research article (not a review, meta-analysis, or qualitative study) on a primary care topic of your interest. Primary care topics may include, but are not limited to, chronic disease management (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), preventive health screenings, patient education interventions, or acute care in outpatient settings. The goal is to assess the article's credibility, methodological rigor, and applicability to NP clinical practice.

    **Learning Objectives**

    · Demonstrate the ability to locate and select appropriate quantitative primary research.

    · Apply a systematic framework to critique research elements, identifying strengths, limitations, and biases.

    · Evaluate the clinical significance of findings for primary care and NP decision-making.

    · Practice scholarly writing in APA format, integrating critical analysis with evidence-based insights.

    **Instructions**

    1.
    **Article Selection**:

    · Choose a peer-reviewed, quantitative primary research article published within the last 10 years (2015 or later) from a reputable nursing or medical journal (e.g., Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice).

    · The article must report original data collection and analysis (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational designs like RCTs, cohort studies, or surveys). Exclude systematic reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, or qualitative studies.

    · Ensure the topic aligns with primary care and is of personal interest to you—justify your choice in the introduction.

    · Submit a PDF copy of the full article with your critique (do not summarize or paraphrase the article without attaching it).

    2.
    **Critique Format and Length**:

    · Write a 3-4 page paper (excluding title page, references, and the attached article).

    · Use APA 7th edition formatting: Double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins.

    · Structure the paper with the following sections (use headings). Base your critique on a systematic approach, drawing from established guidelines for evaluating quantitative research.

    3.
    **Required Sections of the Critique**: Use the following structure to organize your paper. For each section, incorporate specific questions to guide your analysis (adapted from critiquing frameworks).

    ·
    **Introduction (up to 0.5 page)**:

    · Briefly summarize the article's purpose, research question/hypothesis, methods, key findings, and conclusions.

    · Explain why you selected this article and topic (e.g., relevance to your future NP practice in primary care).

    · State the article's overall believability based on initial impressions (e.g., author credentials, journal quality).

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the title clear and accurate? Does the abstract provide a concise overview? Do the authors have relevant qualifications?

    ·
    **Critique of Research Problem and Literature Review (up to 0.5 page)**:

    · Evaluate the clarity and significance of the research problem or purpose.

    · Assess the literature review: Is it comprehensive, balanced, and recent? Does it justify the need for the study?

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the problem logically consistent with the literature? Are primary sources used? Is a theoretical framework identified and appropriate?

    ·
    **Critique of Methods (0.5-1 pages)**:

    · Describe and evaluate the research design (e.g., experimental vs. non-experimental), sample (size, selection, inclusion/exclusion criteria), data collection instruments, and ethical considerations.

    · Discuss validity, reliability, and potential biases (e.g., sampling bias, measurement error).

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the design appropriate for the research question? Was the sample adequate and representative? Were ethical permissions obtained? Was a pilot study conducted?

    ·
    **Critique of Results and Data Analysis (0.5-1 page)**:

    · Summarize the statistical methods used and key results (e.g., p-values, confidence intervals, effect sizes).

    · Evaluate appropriateness of analyses and whether results support the hypothesis.

    _Guiding Questions_: Was the data analysis suitable (e.g., parametric vs. non-parametric tests)? Are findings significant and linked back to the literature? What is the risk of Type I/II errors?

    ·
    **Critique of Discussion, Conclusions, and Implications (0.5-1 page)**:

    · Assess how findings are interpreted, including strengths, limitations, and generalizability.

    · Discuss clinical significance: How do the results apply to primary care? What are the implications for NP practice (e.g., changing protocols, patient education)?

    · Suggest recommendations for future research or practice.

    _Guiding Questions_: Do conclusions flow logically from the data? Are limitations honestly addressed? Is clinical relevance explored beyond statistical significance?

    ·
    **Overall Evaluation and References**:

    · Provide a balanced summary of the article's strengths and weaknesses.

    · Conclude with your recommendation: Is this research credible and useful for evidence-based NP practice in primary care?

    **## ResearchCritique3.docx**

    **Research Critique 3**

    **Assignment Overview**

    This assignment is designed for nurse practitioner (NP) students to enhance skills in evidence-based practice by critically evaluating quantitative research. You will select and critique a primary quantitative research article (not a review, meta-analysis, or qualitative study) on a primary care topic of your interest. Primary care topics may include, but are not limited to, chronic disease management (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), preventive health screenings, patient education interventions, or acute care in outpatient settings. The goal is to assess the article's credibility, methodological rigor, and applicability to NP clinical practice.

    **Learning Objectives**

    · Demonstrate the ability to locate and select appropriate quantitative primary research.

    · Apply a systematic framework to critique research elements, identifying strengths, limitations, and biases.

    · Evaluate the clinical significance of findings for primary care and NP decision-making.

    · Practice scholarly writing in APA format, integrating critical analysis with evidence-based insights.

    **Instructions**

    1.
    **Article Selection**:

    · Choose a peer-reviewed, quantitative primary research article published within the last 10 years (2015 or later) from a reputable nursing or medical journal (e.g., Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice).

    · The article must report original data collection and analysis (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational designs like RCTs, cohort studies, or surveys). Exclude systematic reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, or qualitative studies.

    · Ensure the topic aligns with primary care and is of personal interest to you—justify your choice in the introduction.

    · Submit a PDF copy of the full article with your critique (do not summarize or paraphrase the article without attaching it).

    2.
    **Critique Format and Length**:

    · Write a 3-4 page paper (excluding title page, references, and the attached article).

    · Use APA 7th edition formatting: Double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins.

    · Structure the paper with the following sections (use headings). Base your critique on a systematic approach, drawing from established guidelines for evaluating quantitative research.

    3.
    **Required Sections of the Critique**: Use the following structure to organize your paper. For each section, incorporate specific questions to guide your analysis (adapted from critiquing frameworks).

    ·
    **Introduction (up to 0.5 page)**:

    · Briefly summarize the article's purpose, research question/hypothesis, methods, key findings, and conclusions.

    · Explain why you selected this article and topic (e.g., relevance to your future NP practice in primary care).

    · State the article's overall believability based on initial impressions (e.g., author credentials, journal quality).

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the title clear and accurate? Does the abstract provide a concise overview? Do the authors have relevant qualifications?

    ·
    **Critique of Research Problem and Literature Review (up to 0.5 page)**:

    · Evaluate the clarity and significance of the research problem or purpose.

    · Assess the literature review: Is it comprehensive, balanced, and recent? Does it justify the need for the study?

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the problem logically consistent with the literature? Are primary sources used? Is a theoretical framework identified and appropriate?

    ·
    **Critique of Methods (0.5-1 pages)**:

    · Describe and evaluate the research design (e.g., experimental vs. non-experimental), sample (size, selection, inclusion/exclusion criteria), data collection instruments, and ethical considerations.

    · Discuss validity, reliability, and potential biases (e.g., sampling bias, measurement error).

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the design appropriate for the research question? Was the sample adequate and representative? Were ethical permissions obtained? Was a pilot study conducted?

    ·
    **Critique of Results and Data Analysis (0.5-1 page)**:

    · Summarize the statistical methods used and key results (e.g., p-values, confidence intervals, effect sizes).

    · Evaluate appropriateness of analyses and whether results support the hypothesis.

    _Guiding Questions_: Was the data analysis suitable (e.g., parametric vs. non-parametric tests)? Are findings significant and linked back to the literature? What is the risk of Type I/II errors?

    ·
    **Critique of Discussion, Conclusions, and Implications (0.5-1 page)**:

    · Assess how findings are interpreted, including strengths, limitations, and generalizability.

    · Discuss clinical significance: How do the results apply to primary care? What are the implications for NP practice (e.g., changing protocols, patient education)?

    · Suggest recommendations for future research or practice.

    _Guiding Questions_: Do conclusions flow logically from the data? Are limitations honestly addressed? Is clinical relevance explored beyond statistical significance?

    ·
    **Overall Evaluation and References**:

    · Provide a balanced summary of the article's strengths and weaknesses.

    · Conclude with your recommendation: Is this research credible and useful for evidence-based NP practice in primary care?

  • [Solved] DUE Sept 29: Client Interview Draft

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Submit your complete draft here. ### Major Assignment: Client Interview Report ### Description: In this project, you'll hone your interview skills and gain insight into the goals and challenges of professionals. Interview someone who is a leader in a non-profit organization, manager, or business own…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Submit your complete draft here.
    ### Major Assignment: Client Interview Report
    ### Description:
    In this project, you'll hone your interview skills and gain insight into the goals and challenges of professionals. Interview someone who is a leader in a non-profit organization, manager, or business owner in a field that interests you.
    You'll determine the questions to ask, you'll conduct the interview, and you'll write a report that presents information and recommendations to your readers.
    This project includes these deliverables:
    Pre-interview memo including interviewee information and 2 Annotated Citations for "backgrounder" articles
    Interview Report (preliminary draft and final draft)
    Contact the interview subject early in the semester and schedule the interview during the specified week. When contacting the person, you could say something like this: "I wonder if you would be willing to help me with a class project. I need to interview someone about the problems and challenges of people in your nonprofit field. I would like to do a 30-minute interview over the phone. The content will be used only for my class project and won't be published anywhere. It would really be helpful to me if you could spare the time during the week of ______. Are you available for an interview?"
    Note: You must conduct the interview face-to-face or by phone/video conferencing. Emailed or texted interview questions often result in short, fragmented answers and will not provide the quality of content required for this report.
    ### Audience:
    A researcher who wants to identify the top concerns and challenges of people in the same situation as the interviewee, for the purpose of identifying research priorities.
    ### Purpose:
    The reader is looking for information about the top concerns and challenges of people in the same situation as the interviewee. Your position statement will be something like "my interview with ________ suggest several important topics for further research." Your goal is to explain these topics and their significance, to help the reader to determine research priorities.
    ### Length:
    750-1000 words not including Works Cited.
    ### Structure:
    Include these elements (as described in the Spence book):
    Opening Statement: Present essential information about the interviewee (title, place of work, years in position, etc.) and state your Position
    Methodology: Briefly describe your methods for conducting your interview (length of interview, place of interview, etc.)
    Essential Background: Background information about the job role, business, or nonprofit, to contextualize the discussion for a reader who might not be familiar with this subject matter.
    Issues and Conclusions: Develop and support your position, presenting key topics from your interview and explaining why further research is needed.
    Closing statement/call to action: A short discussion of next steps.
    ### Sources:
    The Essential Background section must include information from at least 1 credible source that was published in the last five years.
    Institutional authors are acceptable if they are highly credible to your intended audience.
    If you wish, you _**also**_ can use _**additional**_ sources that are older or that do not have named authors.
    You can use articles, books, videos, webinars, etc., from academic or professional sources. To determine the credibility of sources, search the Internet to determine the credentials of the author(s) relevant to this subject.
    Your paper must include a Works Cited List with proper MLA citations for all sources that you use.
    Properly cite everything that comes from a source. Follow the best practice of paraphrasing and synthesizing information rather than stringing together quotes. Review the syllabus for information about academic integrity and plagiarism.
    ### Format:
    The report will be created in Word by using a template that conveys professionalism. The text will be a readable size. Headings, sub-headings, figure captions, bullets, tables, etc., will be used to ensure a readable and professional design. The Works Cited list will be properly formatted, as discussed in class.
    ### Suggested Questions:
    Before you conduct the interview, determine what types of information you would like from your subject. Your goal is to learn more about your profession and/or workplace communication, so use the questions below to help guide this preparation.
    **Note:** You may find that some of the answers are not interesting and therefore might not make it into your final report. Plan on collecting more information than you will integrate into the final report.
    What are your top goals for this quarter or this year? Why are those goals important to you?
    How do you measure success?
    When you think about challenges in your position/business/organization, are they mostly related to people… or resources… or technology… or other types of issues?
    What is the top challenge affecting you or your team right now?
    If you could magically make one big change to improve your organization right now–no limits, anything at all–what would it be?
    When you think about general trends in society/business/technology right now, what kinds of issues are having the biggest impact on your type of business/organization?
    When you think about technology, what kinds of problems, challenges, or goals do you have right now?
    Are there any new trends in technology that could be useful in your organization?
    If you could do a survey of any group of people, who would you want to survey and how would that information help you?
    If you had time to go get expert advice about any issue, concern, new trend right now, what topics would you want to research?
    \
    Taipo_Restaurant_Memo1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/taipo-restaurant-memo1-pdf "Taipo_Restaurant_Memo1.pdf")

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module6.docx **## Module6.docx** **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_ **Instructions:** Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying oth…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module6.docx

    **## Module6.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    **Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 2 |

    **## Module6.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    **Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 2 |

  • [Solved] How you recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering How you recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice?.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.