My Blog

Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] innovation report

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## innovinbusiness.docx – EcoPackInnovations.pptx **## innovinbusiness.docx** **INNOVATION IN BUSINESS 2024-25** **Report and Presentation: your Business Plan** **You will need to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## innovinbusiness.docx

    – EcoPackInnovations.pptx

    **## innovinbusiness.docx**

    **INNOVATION IN BUSINESS 2024-25**

    **Report and Presentation: your Business Plan**

    **You will need to:**

    (1)
    **Develop and submit into Turnitin the Business Plan** of
    **YOUR OWN innovation project in a corporation or developing your own start-up in a sector of your choice**, following the table of contents indicated below. You can continue with the innovation project in a corporation or start-up you developed in your midterm assignment or work on a different project.

    (2)
    **Make a group pitch presentation in-class of the Business Plan.**

    Table of Contents:

    1. Executive summary

    1. The idea, mission, vision, values of the company

    1. The business opportunity and market it pretends to serve.

    1. The competitor’s analysis

    1. The industry analysis

    1. The environmental analysis (PESTEL)

    1. Strengths and weaknesses of the start-up and resulting opportunities and threats (SWOT)

    1. 3-year future goals

    1. Action Plan: Marketing & Sales, Operations, HR, IT, Legal, Financials

    1. Implementation Schedule

    1. Viability and Conclusions

    1. References

    · Use relevant vocabulary and concepts covered in the course.

    · Use reliable sources of information.

    · Information must be contextual

    · Table of contents required

    **Formalities:**

    · Format:
    **Powerpoint presentation (suggested)**

    · Number of slides: open
    **(10-20 pages)**

    · Including Cover, Table of Contents, Images, Tables, Graphs. References and Appendix are excluded from the slide count.

    · The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

    **In-class pitch presentation**

    **Learning outcomes:** It assesses the following learning outcomes:

    · Outcome 1: categorize and assess business opportunities and their feasibility

    · Outcome 2: evaluate funding sources and their match with the business plan

    · Outcome 3: demonstrate analytical and conceptual skills

    · Outcome 4: demonstrate discussion and presentation techniques

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup , but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup . Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Pitch presentation:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(50%)** | Student proposes highly adequate strategic objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate strategic objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some strategic objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some strategic objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any strategic objectives. |
    | **Oral communication**<br>**(50%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the time limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup, but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup. Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **EcoPackInnovations.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ecopackinnovations-pptx)

    **EcoPackInnovations.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ecopackinnovations-pptx)

    **## innovinbusiness.docx**

    **INNOVATION IN BUSINESS 2024-25**

    **Report and Presentation: your Business Plan**

    **You will need to:**

    (1)
    **Develop and submit into Turnitin the Business Plan** of
    **YOUR OWN innovation project in a corporation or developing your own start-up in a sector of your choice**, following the table of contents indicated below. You can continue with the innovation project in a corporation or start-up you developed in your midterm assignment or work on a different project.

    (2)
    **Make a group pitch presentation in-class of the Business Plan.**

    Table of Contents:

    1. Executive summary

    1. The idea, mission, vision, values of the company

    1. The business opportunity and market it pretends to serve.

    1. The competitor’s analysis

    1. The industry analysis

    1. The environmental analysis (PESTEL)

    1. Strengths and weaknesses of the start-up and resulting opportunities and threats (SWOT)

    1. 3-year future goals

    1. Action Plan: Marketing & Sales, Operations, HR, IT, Legal, Financials

    1. Implementation Schedule

    1. Viability and Conclusions

    1. References

    · Use relevant vocabulary and concepts covered in the course.

    · Use reliable sources of information.

    · Information must be contextual

    · Table of contents required

    **Formalities:**

    · Format:
    **Powerpoint presentation (suggested)**

    · Number of slides: open
    **(10-20 pages)**

    · Including Cover, Table of Contents, Images, Tables, Graphs. References and Appendix are excluded from the slide count.

    · The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

    **In-class pitch presentation**

    **Learning outcomes:** It assesses the following learning outcomes:

    · Outcome 1: categorize and assess business opportunities and their feasibility

    · Outcome 2: evaluate funding sources and their match with the business plan

    · Outcome 3: demonstrate analytical and conceptual skills

    · Outcome 4: demonstrate discussion and presentation techniques

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup , but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup . Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Pitch presentation:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(50%)** | Student proposes highly adequate strategic objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate strategic objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some strategic objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some strategic objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any strategic objectives. |
    | **Oral communication**<br>**(50%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the time limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup, but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup. Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **EcoPackInnovations.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ecopackinnovations-pptx)

    **## innovinbusiness.docx**

    **INNOVATION IN BUSINESS 2024-25**

    **Report and Presentation: your Business Plan**

    **You will need to:**

    (1)
    **Develop and submit into Turnitin the Business Plan** of
    **YOUR OWN innovation project in a corporation or developing your own start-up in a sector of your choice**, following the table of contents indicated below. You can continue with the innovation project in a corporation or start-up you developed in your midterm assignment or work on a different project.

    (2)
    **Make a group pitch presentation in-class of the Business Plan.**

    Table of Contents:

    1. Executive summary

    1. The idea, mission, vision, values of the company

    1. The business opportunity and market it pretends to serve.

    1. The competitor’s analysis

    1. The industry analysis

    1. The environmental analysis (PESTEL)

    1. Strengths and weaknesses of the start-up and resulting opportunities and threats (SWOT)

    1. 3-year future goals

    1. Action Plan: Marketing & Sales, Operations, HR, IT, Legal, Financials

    1. Implementation Schedule

    1. Viability and Conclusions

    1. References

    · Use relevant vocabulary and concepts covered in the course.

    · Use reliable sources of information.

    · Information must be contextual

    · Table of contents required

    **Formalities:**

    · Format:
    **Powerpoint presentation (suggested)**

    · Number of slides: open
    **(10-20 pages)**

    · Including Cover, Table of Contents, Images, Tables, Graphs. References and Appendix are excluded from the slide count.

    · The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

    **In-class pitch presentation**

    **Learning outcomes:** It assesses the following learning outcomes:

    · Outcome 1: categorize and assess business opportunities and their feasibility

    · Outcome 2: evaluate funding sources and their match with the business plan

    · Outcome 3: demonstrate analytical and conceptual skills

    · Outcome 4: demonstrate discussion and presentation techniques

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup , but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup . Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Pitch presentation:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(50%)** | Student proposes highly adequate strategic objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate strategic objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some strategic objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some strategic objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any strategic objectives. |
    | **Oral communication**<br>**(50%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the time limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup, but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup. Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **EcoPackInnovations.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ecopackinnovations-pptx)

  • [Solved] help with disc due in 24 hours

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    attached – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ModuleOneDiscussionForum.docx **## ModuleOneDiscussionForum.docx** **Module One Discussion Forum** How to use quotes: [https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/quotations/Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/quotations…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ModuleOneDiscussionForum.docx

    **## ModuleOneDiscussionForum.docx**

    **Module One Discussion Forum**

    How to use quotes:
    [https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/quotations/Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/quotations/)

    How to write paraphrases:
    [https://integrity.mit.edu/handbook/academic-writing/avoiding-plagiarism-paraphrasingLinks to an external site.](https://integrity.mit.edu/handbook/academic-writing/avoiding-plagiarism-paraphrasing)

    Post your participation post for the week in this forum.
    Make sure to read the "
    _Discussion participation requirements_" section of the syllabus before posting anything in this forum, and use the
    _"Checklist for responses to discussion questions_" I provided in this area of the course to help you. The
    minimum length requirement for your responses to the discussion questions in order to earn any credit is 600 words (does not include references).
    **Not surprisingly, the most effective responses to discussion questions well-exceed the minimum.** The minimum length for each of your replies to classmates in order to earn any credit is 150 words.

    **IMPORTANT #1 –  In order to avoid problems with plagiarism, it is essential that you cite and reference all of the information you present in your analysis. But this is really easy to do! In-text citations must include author, year of publication,**
    **and page number. APA recommends but does not require including page numbers in summarized or paraphrased information taken from sources. But in this course, we will follow the APA recommendation and include page numbers in ALL citations, for both direct quotes and paraphrased information. Don't forget to put direct quotes in quotation marks.**

    **IMPORTANT #2 – A sample discussion question response from a previous student in this course has been posted in the Discussions section of the course. Please review this before doing your assignment. It will give you an excellent idea of what an A-level analysis looks like and what the expectations are in this course for A-level work on discussion assignments.**

    **This sample essay also provides guidance on exactly how to do your in-text citations. Please see the instructions in that essay. The essay is entitled -"Student Sample Discussion Question Response" and is here in the Discussions section of the course.**

    **If you have any questions, please let me know. I will be more than happy to help you!**

    ______________________________________

    Apply the work of Karl Marx in analyzing capitalism in modern America.

    A. – Fully describe at least three major ideas/concepts in the work of Marx.

    B. – Apply each of them to the characteristics, processes, and/or outcomes of modern American capitalism in providing your assessment of whether the work of Marx is useful in understanding modern capitalism. Present specific evidence to support whatever position you take.

    **Label each section (A. and B.)**

    In doing section A. of this assignment, information on the theorist (Marx for this week's assignment) must be presented from
    only the textbook to support this part of the analysis, not any other sources.

    In section B. there must be information from the textbook
    and at least two outside sources to support your analysis. The outside sources can be but need not be from academic sources. They must, however, be credible sources. Someone's blog rantings or an opinion article would not be an appropriate source.

    **_Discussion participation requirements_**

    As is the case in a face-to-face classroom environment, discussion of the topics and issues we will be covering is an essential part of the course experience. In addition, the work you will be doing on the discussion assignments will prepare you for the kinds of work you will be asked to do on the Comprehensive Exam. You will be posting responses to discussion questions in the first eight weeks of the term and will also be posting
    **at least two** substantive replies to classmates for each of the discussion questions in each of these weeks.

    Here are the requirements that you need to meet to ensure that you maximize what you can accomplish on this part of the course.

    1. The
    minimum length requirement for your responses to the discussion questions the instructor posts is 600 words each.
    **To earn any credit, your post must meet this minimum. Not surprisingly, the most effective responses to discussion questions well-exceed the minimum. A sample essay written by a student in a previous edition of this course is provided for you in the discussions area of the course.**

    2. As noted above, you must also post two responses to your classmates for each of the discussion questions to which you respond each of the assigned weeks. These must be at least 150 words in length each.
    **To earn any credit,**
    **each of the two required replies to your classmates must meet this minimum.** And as shown on the Discussion Question Rubric, to earn the maximum points for replies, multiple pieces of information must be incorporated and cited in each of at least two replies.

    3. With regard to replies to your classmates, we are not looking for statements of agreement but rather substantive discussion. Do not post replies to your classmates in which you simply articulate that you agree with what they posted. Pick some with which you disagree, indicate your opinion, and then explain your reasoning and the evidence you find persuasive.

    4. In a graduate course, we naturally want you to support your discussion question responses
    and replies to classmates with evidence from the course material. There is enough unsubstantiated speculation floating around and we don’t want to add to it! You will earn more points on your replies when you do this, as per the grading rubric.
    **And make sure to cite and reference the information you include from that material. In-text citations must include author, year of publication, and page number. APA recommends but does not require including page numbers in summarized or paraphrased information taken from sources. But in this course, we will follow the APA recommendation and include page numbers in ALL citations, for both quotations and paraphrased information. And remember that direct quotes must also be in quotation marks to distinguish them from your own writing. Paraphrased information is information that you have obtained from a source (such as our textbook) but that you have rewritten entirely in your own words.**

    Proofread what you write and take a moment to run the spellchecker before hitting the “submit” button. As in all written assignments in this course, writing is part of the grading. I encourage you to use
    **Grammarly**. It is free and will definitely help your writing. (I know it helps me!)
    [www.grammarly.comLinks to an external site.](http://www.grammarly.com/)

    **## ModuleOneDiscussionForum.docx**

    **Module One Discussion Forum**

    How to use quotes:
    [https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/quotations/Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/quotations/)

    How to write paraphrases:
    [https://integrity.mit.edu/handbook/academic-writing/avoiding-plagiarism-paraphrasingLinks to an external site.](https://integrity.mit.edu/handbook/academic-writing/avoiding-plagiarism-paraphrasing)

    Post your participation post for the week in this forum.
    Make sure to read the "
    _Discussion participation requirements_" section of the syllabus before posting anything in this forum, and use the
    _"Checklist for responses to discussion questions_" I provided in this area of the course to help you. The
    minimum length requirement for your responses to the discussion questions in order to earn any credit is 600 words (does not include references).
    **Not surprisingly, the most effective responses to discussion questions well-exceed the minimum.** The minimum length for each of your replies to classmates in order to earn any credit is 150 words.

    **IMPORTANT #1 –  In order to avoid problems with plagiarism, it is essential that you cite and reference all of the information you present in your analysis. But this is really easy to do! In-text citations must include author, year of publication,**
    **and page number. APA recommends but does not require including page numbers in summarized or paraphrased information taken from sources. But in this course, we will follow the APA recommendation and include page numbers in ALL citations, for both direct quotes and paraphrased information. Don't forget to put direct quotes in quotation marks.**

    **IMPORTANT #2 – A sample discussion question response from a previous student in this course has been posted in the Discussions section of the course. Please review this before doing your assignment. It will give you an excellent idea of what an A-level analysis looks like and what the expectations are in this course for A-level work on discussion assignments.**

    **This sample essay also provides guidance on exactly how to do your in-text citations. Please see the instructions in that essay. The essay is entitled -"Student Sample Discussion Question Response" and is here in the Discussions section of the course.**

    **If you have any questions, please let me know. I will be more than happy to help you!**

    ______________________________________

    Apply the work of Karl Marx in analyzing capitalism in modern America.

    A. – Fully describe at least three major ideas/concepts in the work of Marx.

    B. – Apply each of them to the characteristics, processes, and/or outcomes of modern American capitalism in providing your assessment of whether the work of Marx is useful in understanding modern capitalism. Present specific evidence to support whatever position you take.

    **Label each section (A. and B.)**

    In doing section A. of this assignment, information on the theorist (Marx for this week's assignment) must be presented from
    only the textbook to support this part of the analysis, not any other sources.

    In section B. there must be information from the textbook
    and at least two outside sources to support your analysis. The outside sources can be but need not be from academic sources. They must, however, be credible sources. Someone's blog rantings or an opinion article would not be an appropriate source.

    **_Discussion participation requirements_**

    As is the case in a face-to-face classroom environment, discussion of the topics and issues we will be covering is an essential part of the course experience. In addition, the work you will be doing on the discussion assignments will prepare you for the kinds of work you will be asked to do on the Comprehensive Exam. You will be posting responses to discussion questions in the first eight weeks of the term and will also be posting
    **at least two** substantive replies to classmates for each of the discussion questions in each of these weeks.

    Here are the requirements that you need to meet to ensure that you maximize what you can accomplish on this part of the course.

    1. The
    minimum length requirement for your responses to the discussion questions the instructor posts is 600 words each.
    **To earn any credit, your post must meet this minimum. Not surprisingly, the most effective responses to discussion questions well-exceed the minimum. A sample essay written by a student in a previous edition of this course is provided for you in the discussions area of the course.**

    2. As noted above, you must also post two responses to your classmates for each of the discussion questions to which you respond each of the assigned weeks. These must be at least 150 words in length each.
    **To earn any credit,**
    **each of the two required replies to your classmates must meet this minimum.** And as shown on the Discussion Question Rubric, to earn the maximum points for replies, multiple pieces of information must be incorporated and cited in each of at least two replies.

    3. With regard to replies to your classmates, we are not looking for statements of agreement but rather substantive discussion. Do not post replies to your classmates in which you simply articulate that you agree with what they posted. Pick some with which you disagree, indicate your opinion, and then explain your reasoning and the evidence you find persuasive.

    4. In a graduate course, we naturally want you to support your discussion question responses
    and replies to classmates with evidence from the course material. There is enough unsubstantiated speculation floating around and we don’t want to add to it! You will earn more points on your replies when you do this, as per the grading rubric.
    **And make sure to cite and reference the information you include from that material. In-text citations must include author, year of publication, and page number. APA recommends but does not require including page numbers in summarized or paraphrased information taken from sources. But in this course, we will follow the APA recommendation and include page numbers in ALL citations, for both quotations and paraphrased information. And remember that direct quotes must also be in quotation marks to distinguish them from your own writing. Paraphrased information is information that you have obtained from a source (such as our textbook) but that you have rewritten entirely in your own words.**

    Proofread what you write and take a moment to run the spellchecker before hitting the “submit” button. As in all written assignments in this course, writing is part of the grading. I encourage you to use
    **Grammarly**. It is free and will definitely help your writing. (I know it helps me!)
    [www.grammarly.comLinks to an external site.](http://www.grammarly.com/)

  • [Solved] English

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    "What is Morality?".On p. 14-15 you find "The Emergency Room" problem. Please read the case and then answer the four questions on p. 15. Note: I do not want receive short answers to each question. What I want is a narrative that you would construct if you were explaining the issues to an adolescent …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    "What is Morality?".On p. 14-15 you find "The Emergency Room" problem. Please read the case and then answer the four questions on p. 15.

    Note: I do not want receive short answers to each question. What I want is a narrative that you would construct if you were explaining the issues to an adolescent who wants to be a doctor. Here is a set of facts describing a moral problem.

    – [\
    \
    IMG_7510.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7510-jpeg "IMG_7510.jpeg")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_7509.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7509-jpeg "IMG_7509.jpeg")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_7508.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7508-jpeg "IMG_7508.jpeg")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_7512.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7512-jpeg "IMG_7512.jpeg")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Project 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Develop a strategic action plan for yourself. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Develop a strategic action plan for yourself.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Project 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Develop a long-term and a short-term plan for yourself using what you have learned about yourself through the SWOT analysis and environmental scan you completed. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Develop a long-term and a short-term plan for yourself using what you have learned about yourself through the SWOT analysis and environmental scan you completed.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Project 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Conduct an environmental scan and write an assessment in which you focus on both the internal and external factors that could affect your success within your chosen industry. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Conduct an environmental scan and write an assessment in which you focus on both the internal and external factors that could affect your success within your chosen industry.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Project 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Conduct an environmental scan and write an assessment in which you focus on both the internal and external factors that could affect your success within your chosen industry. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Conduct an environmental scan and write an assessment in which you focus on both the internal and external factors that could affect your success within your chosen industry.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 509-ap5-R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 509-ap5-R.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Community Teaching Project – Part 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Presentation Development** The purpose of this assignment is to develop a presentation of the topic chosen for the identified community based on the Community Teaching Project **(Carrfour Supportive Housing)**. Prepare a presentation using the "Community Teaching Project" templates that were compl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Presentation Development**

    The purpose of this assignment is to develop a presentation of the topic chosen for the identified community based on the Community Teaching Project **(Carrfour Supportive Housing)**.

    Prepare a presentation using the "Community Teaching Project" templates that were completed previously in this course along with the information from the interview with the community representative. **(Part 1, 2, 3, see attachments)**

    Students will give this presentation to the selected community in Topic 5. **Reach out to the selected representative to confirm the date and time to present the selected topic to the community.**

    **PowerPoint presentation (no more than 30 minutes)**

    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

    This assignment uses a rubric **(see attachment)**. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

    This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 2.8, and 6.1

    – [\
    \
    NRS-425-RS-T1-CommunityTeachingProjectPart1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nrs-425-rs-t1-communityteachingprojectpart1-docx-10155509 "NRS-425-RS-T1-CommunityTeachingProjectPart1.docx")
    – [\
    \
    NRS-425-RS-T2-CommunityTeachingProjectPart2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nrs-425-rs-t2-communityteachingprojectpart2-docx "NRS-425-RS-T2-CommunityTeachingProjectPart2.docx")
    – [\
    \
    NRS-425-RS-T2-CommunityTeachingProjectPart3.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nrs-425-rs-t2-communityteachingprojectpart3-docx "NRS-425-RS-T2-CommunityTeachingProjectPart3.docx")
    – [\
    \
    NRS-425Rubric-CommunityTeachingProject-Part5.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nrs-425rubric-communityteachingproject-part5-pdf "NRS-425Rubric-CommunityTeachingProject-Part5.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 2500 wordss + ppt

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Coca Cola is the company files below – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## taskinfo.pdf **## taskinfo.pdf** Task 1.1: Group Assignment (Theme 2) Assessment type: Video and/or audio presentation Duration: • Group Pr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    Coca Cola is the company

    files below

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## taskinfo.pdf

    **## taskinfo.pdf**

    Task 1.1: Group Assignment (Theme 2)
    Assessment type: Video and/or audio presentation

    Duration:

    • Group Presentation: 25 minutes
    • Individual Report: 2500 words

    Group Size: 2-3 students

    Objectives

    1. Analyze and Evaluate: Critically analyze and evaluate the management practices
    and performance of a selected large corporation.

    2. Research and Data Gathering: Collect and interpret information from reliable
    sources to support your findings.

    3. Align with Sustainability Goals: Examine the corporation’s management
    strategies in light of the UN’s Global Sustainability Goals (SDGs) 2030 and propose
    strategic realignment.

    4. Collaborative Contribution: Document and communicate each group member’s
    contributions to the assessment.

    Structure of the Assessment

    1. Group Presentation (25 minutes)

    A. Presentation Components (Total: 25 minutes)

    1. Introduction
    o Brief introduction of the selected corporation.
    o Outline the objectives of the presentation.

    2. Management Practices Analysis
    o Describe the current management practices of the corporation.
    o Identify and analyze key management strategies used by the corporation.
    o Discuss any relevant performance metrics and data.

    3. Performance Evaluation
    o Assess the performance of the corporation based on qualitative and

    quantitative data.
    o Compare performance with industry standards or competitors.
    o Highlight strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT

    analysis).
    4. Sustainability Alignment

    o Discuss the relevance of the UN’s Global Sustainability Goals (SDGs) 2030
    to the corporation.

    o Identify specific PLCs (Product Life Cycles) that require strategic
    realignment.

    o Justify the necessity for changes in management practices to meet these
    goals.

    5. Conclusions and Recommendations
    o Summarize key findings.
    o Present actionable recommendations for management and sustainability

    alignment.
    6. Q&A Session

    o Open the floor for questions from the audience.

    2. Individual Report (2500 Words)

    A. Report Structure (Total: 2500 words)

    1. Title Page
    o Title of the report.
    o Names of group members.
    o Date of submission.

    2. Executive Summary (200 words)
    o A concise summary of the report’s main findings, recommendations, and

    conclusions.
    3. Introduction (300 words)

    o Background of the selected corporation.
    o Purpose and scope of the report.
    o Brief overview of the structure of the report.

    4. Analysis of Management Practices (600 words)
    o Detailed examination of current management practices.
    o Discussion of key management strategies, including leadership, decision-

    making processes, and organizational structure.
    o Use of data and evidence from reliable sources to support the analysis.

    5. Performance Evaluation (600 words)
    o In-depth evaluation of the corporation’s performance metrics (financial and

    non-financial).
    o Comparison with industry benchmarks and competitors.
    o SWOT analysis highlighting strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and

    threats.
    6. Sustainability Alignment (500 words)

    o Analysis of how the corporation aligns with the UN’s Global Sustainability
    Goals (SDGs) 2030.

    o Identification of specific PLCs needing strategic realignment.
    o Justification for changes needed to improve sustainability practices.

    7. Conclusions and Recommendations (300 words)
    o Summary of key findings from the analysis.
    o Practical recommendations for enhancing management practices and

    aligning with sustainability goals.
    8. Contributions from Group Members (100 words)

    o Brief note on the contributions of each member to the overall project.
    9. References

    o List all sources used in APA or MLA format, ensuring reliable and credible
    sources are cited.

    Learning Outcomes

    • LO1: Identify, reflect on, and evaluate their own strengths, abilities, and

    performance, and the impact of these factors in relation to their future management

    style, employability, and career.

    • LO2: Critically evaluate and re-design the internal management and performance of

    large corporations to contribute to external long-term global sustainable goals.

    Assessment Criteria

    1. Content Quality (40%)
    o Depth of analysis and evaluation of management practices and performance.
    o Relevance and integration of sustainability goals.

    2. Research and Data Use (30%)
    o Use of reliable and relevant sources to support findings.
    o Quality and appropriateness of data presented.

    3. Presentation Skills (20%)
    o Clarity, coherence, and organization of the group presentation.
    o Ability to engage the audience and respond to questions.

    4. Report Structure and Writing Quality (10%)
    o Clarity, coherence, and academic rigor of the individual report.
    o Adherence to formatting and citation guidelines.

    Submission Guidelines

    • Presentation: All groups to present/submit ppt slides on the scheduled date (s).
    • Report: Submit the individual report by the deadline, ensuring that it adheres to the

    word count and formatting guidelines.

    This assessment framework provides a comprehensive guide for students to follow,
    ensuring they cover all necessary aspects of the assignment. It encourages collaboration
    while allowing for individual expression and critical evaluation of the selected corporation’s
    practices.

    **## taskinfo.pdf**

    Task 1.1: Group Assignment (Theme 2)
    Assessment type: Video and/or audio presentation

    Duration:

    • Group Presentation: 25 minutes
    • Individual Report: 2500 words

    Group Size: 2-3 students

    Objectives

    1. Analyze and Evaluate: Critically analyze and evaluate the management practices
    and performance of a selected large corporation.

    2. Research and Data Gathering: Collect and interpret information from reliable
    sources to support your findings.

    3. Align with Sustainability Goals: Examine the corporation’s management
    strategies in light of the UN’s Global Sustainability Goals (SDGs) 2030 and propose
    strategic realignment.

    4. Collaborative Contribution: Document and communicate each group member’s
    contributions to the assessment.

    Structure of the Assessment

    1. Group Presentation (25 minutes)

    A. Presentation Components (Total: 25 minutes)

    1. Introduction
    o Brief introduction of the selected corporation.
    o Outline the objectives of the presentation.

    2. Management Practices Analysis
    o Describe the current management practices of the corporation.
    o Identify and analyze key management strategies used by the corporation.
    o Discuss any relevant performance metrics and data.

    3. Performance Evaluation
    o Assess the performance of the corporation based on qualitative and

    quantitative data.
    o Compare performance with industry standards or competitors.
    o Highlight strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT

    analysis).
    4. Sustainability Alignment

    o Discuss the relevance of the UN’s Global Sustainability Goals (SDGs) 2030
    to the corporation.

    o Identify specific PLCs (Product Life Cycles) that require strategic
    realignment.

    o Justify the necessity for changes in management practices to meet these
    goals.

    5. Conclusions and Recommendations
    o Summarize key findings.
    o Present actionable recommendations for management and sustainability

    alignment.
    6. Q&A Session

    o Open the floor for questions from the audience.

    2. Individual Report (2500 Words)

    A. Report Structure (Total: 2500 words)

    1. Title Page
    o Title of the report.
    o Names of group members.
    o Date of submission.

    2. Executive Summary (200 words)
    o A concise summary of the report’s main findings, recommendations, and

    conclusions.
    3. Introduction (300 words)

    o Background of the selected corporation.
    o Purpose and scope of the report.
    o Brief overview of the structure of the report.

    4. Analysis of Management Practices (600 words)
    o Detailed examination of current management practices.
    o Discussion of key management strategies, including leadership, decision-

    making processes, and organizational structure.
    o Use of data and evidence from reliable sources to support the analysis.

    5. Performance Evaluation (600 words)
    o In-depth evaluation of the corporation’s performance metrics (financial and

    non-financial).
    o Comparison with industry benchmarks and competitors.
    o SWOT analysis highlighting strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and

    threats.
    6. Sustainability Alignment (500 words)

    o Analysis of how the corporation aligns with the UN’s Global Sustainability
    Goals (SDGs) 2030.

    o Identification of specific PLCs needing strategic realignment.
    o Justification for changes needed to improve sustainability practices.

    7. Conclusions and Recommendations (300 words)
    o Summary of key findings from the analysis.
    o Practical recommendations for enhancing management practices and

    aligning with sustainability goals.
    8. Contributions from Group Members (100 words)

    o Brief note on the contributions of each member to the overall project.
    9. References

    o List all sources used in APA or MLA format, ensuring reliable and credible
    sources are cited.

    Learning Outcomes

    • LO1: Identify, reflect on, and evaluate their own strengths, abilities, and

    performance, and the impact of these factors in relation to their future management

    style, employability, and career.

    • LO2: Critically evaluate and re-design the internal management and performance of

    large corporations to contribute to external long-term global sustainable goals.

    Assessment Criteria

    1. Content Quality (40%)
    o Depth of analysis and evaluation of management practices and performance.
    o Relevance and integration of sustainability goals.

    2. Research and Data Use (30%)
    o Use of reliable and relevant sources to support findings.
    o Quality and appropriateness of data presented.

    3. Presentation Skills (20%)
    o Clarity, coherence, and organization of the group presentation.
    o Ability to engage the audience and respond to questions.

    4. Report Structure and Writing Quality (10%)
    o Clarity, coherence, and academic rigor of the individual report.
    o Adherence to formatting and citation guidelines.

    Submission Guidelines

    • Presentation: All groups to present/submit ppt slides on the scheduled date (s).
    • Report: Submit the individual report by the deadline, ensuring that it adheres to the

    word count and formatting guidelines.

    This assessment framework provides a comprehensive guide for students to follow,
    ensuring they cover all necessary aspects of the assignment. It encourages collaboration
    while allowing for individual expression and critical evaluation of the selected corporation’s
    practices.