Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] Discussion board

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need a little help and some ideas for the discussion board. – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Discussion1.docx – ## Rubric.pdf **## Discussion1.docx** 500 words initial post Both Cohen's Model of Basic Student Socialization and Benner's Stages of Nursing Proficiency offer insightful frameworks for un…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need a little help and some ideas for the discussion board.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Discussion1.docx

    – ## Rubric.pdf

    **## Discussion1.docx**

    500 words initial post

    Both Cohen's Model of Basic Student Socialization and Benner's Stages of Nursing Proficiency offer insightful frameworks for understanding the development of students and professionals in the field of nursing. Cohen's model focuses on the socialization process of nursing students into the profession, highlighting key stages such as Unilateral Dependence, Negativity/Independence, and Team Dependence. On the other hand, Benner's stages outline the progression of nursing proficiency from Novice to Expert, emphasizing the acquisition of skills, knowledge, and clinical judgment over time.

    •    Why do you think it is important for you to understand the process of socialization in the profession of nursing?
    •    How do Cohen's stages of basic student socialization align with your own experiences or observations as a nursing student?
    •    Reflect on your journey through Benner's stages of nursing proficiency. Which stage do you currently identify with, and what challenges or breakthroughs have you encountered along the way?
    •    How do these two models complement each other in shaping the professional identity and practice of nurses? Are there any areas that overlap? Any areas of clear separation?

    **## Rubric.pdf**

    RNSG 2121 Discussion Board Grading Rubric
    Course: 2025SP-RNSG-2121-72201-Nurse Leadership & Management

    Criteria
    Level 4
    40 points

    Level 3
    30 points

    Level 2
    20 points

    Level 1
    10 points

    Criterion Score

    Initial Post Content / 40Initial posting is rich in

    content full of thought,

    insight, and analysis.

    Posting thoroughly

    answers the discussion

    prompts and

    demonstrates

    understanding of

    material with well-

    developed ideas. Posting

    integrates assigned

    content and makes

    strong connections to

    practice.

    Initial posting has

    substantial information.

    Thought, insight, and

    analysis have taken

    place.

    Posting addresses most

    of the prompt(s) and

    demonstrates mild

    understanding of

    material with well-

    developed ideas. Posting

    references assigned

    content and may not

    make connections to

    practice.

    Initial posting is

    generally competent.

    Information is thin and

    commonplace.

    Posting fails to address

    all components of the

    prompt. Makes short or

    irrelevant remarks.

    Posting lacks connection

    to practice.

    Initial posting is not

    relevant or no subject

    matter knowledge is

    evident.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    10 points

    Level 3
    8 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Initial Post Submission / 10Fully answers the

    prompt by

    Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

    of the week assigned.

    Initial posting contains

    at least 2 references.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    Fully answers the

    prompt by Friday (11:59

    p.m. CST) of the week

    assigned. Initial posting

    contains less than 2

    references.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    Fully answers the

    prompt by

    Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

    of the week assigned.

    No references included.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    No initial posting by

    Friday (11:59 pm CST)

    or posting is less than

    the minimum of 500

    words.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    20 points

    Level 3
    15 points

    Level 2
    10 points

    Level 1
    5 points

    Criterion Score

    Peer Responses / 20Provides a minimum of

    two substantive peer

    replies with reference by

    Monday 11:59 pm. A

    minimum of one (1)

    reference is required per

    peer reply.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    Provides replies to two

    peers with simple

    comments and/or

    reference(s) not

    provided by Monday

    11:59 pm. A minimum of

    one (1) reference is

    required for each peer

    reply.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    Provides only one peer

    reply by Monday 11:59

    pm. Appropriate

    references are not

    included on both peer

    responses.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    No replies to peer

    postings or postings are

    less than the minimum

    of 250 words.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    15 points

    Level 3
    10 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    APA Format / 15Correct APA format of

    in-text citations (within

    the body of the posting)

    and references (in the

    list). Both are required

    to earn any points.

    1- 2 APA errors. 3-4 APA errors. No use of APA format or

    5+ errors.

    Criteria
    Level 3
    10 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    References / 10All references are relevant,

    scholarly, and within last 5

    years.

    Some references are not

    relevant, scholarly, or more

    than 5 years old.

    No use of references.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    5 points

    Level 3
    3.5 points

    Level 2
    2 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Spelling & Grammar / 5Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics

    and

    word usage are correct

    and consistent with

    American English.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics,

    and word usage are

    adequate and consistent

    with American English.

    errors do not interfere

    with meaning or

    understanding.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics,

    and word usage are

    distracting and could

    interfere with meaning

    or understanding.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics

    and/or

    word usage interfere

    with understanding and

    do not reflect scholarly

    writing.

    Level 4
    14 points minimum

    Level 3
    11 points minimum

    Level 2
    8 points minimum

    Level 1
    5 points minimum

    **## Rubric.pdf**

    RNSG 2121 Discussion Board Grading Rubric
    Course: 2025SP-RNSG-2121-72201-Nurse Leadership & Management

    Criteria
    Level 4
    40 points

    Level 3
    30 points

    Level 2
    20 points

    Level 1
    10 points

    Criterion Score

    Initial Post Content / 40Initial posting is rich in

    content full of thought,

    insight, and analysis.

    Posting thoroughly

    answers the discussion

    prompts and

    demonstrates

    understanding of

    material with well-

    developed ideas. Posting

    integrates assigned

    content and makes

    strong connections to

    practice.

    Initial posting has

    substantial information.

    Thought, insight, and

    analysis have taken

    place.

    Posting addresses most

    of the prompt(s) and

    demonstrates mild

    understanding of

    material with well-

    developed ideas. Posting

    references assigned

    content and may not

    make connections to

    practice.

    Initial posting is

    generally competent.

    Information is thin and

    commonplace.

    Posting fails to address

    all components of the

    prompt. Makes short or

    irrelevant remarks.

    Posting lacks connection

    to practice.

    Initial posting is not

    relevant or no subject

    matter knowledge is

    evident.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    10 points

    Level 3
    8 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Initial Post Submission / 10Fully answers the

    prompt by

    Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

    of the week assigned.

    Initial posting contains

    at least 2 references.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    Fully answers the

    prompt by Friday (11:59

    p.m. CST) of the week

    assigned. Initial posting

    contains less than 2

    references.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    Fully answers the

    prompt by

    Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

    of the week assigned.

    No references included.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    No initial posting by

    Friday (11:59 pm CST)

    or posting is less than

    the minimum of 500

    words.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    20 points

    Level 3
    15 points

    Level 2
    10 points

    Level 1
    5 points

    Criterion Score

    Peer Responses / 20Provides a minimum of

    two substantive peer

    replies with reference by

    Monday 11:59 pm. A

    minimum of one (1)

    reference is required per

    peer reply.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    Provides replies to two

    peers with simple

    comments and/or

    reference(s) not

    provided by Monday

    11:59 pm. A minimum of

    one (1) reference is

    required for each peer

    reply.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    Provides only one peer

    reply by Monday 11:59

    pm. Appropriate

    references are not

    included on both peer

    responses.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    No replies to peer

    postings or postings are

    less than the minimum

    of 250 words.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    15 points

    Level 3
    10 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    APA Format / 15Correct APA format of

    in-text citations (within

    the body of the posting)

    and references (in the

    list). Both are required

    to earn any points.

    1- 2 APA errors. 3-4 APA errors. No use of APA format or

    5+ errors.

    Criteria
    Level 3
    10 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    References / 10All references are relevant,

    scholarly, and within last 5

    years.

    Some references are not

    relevant, scholarly, or more

    than 5 years old.

    No use of references.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    5 points

    Level 3
    3.5 points

    Level 2
    2 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Spelling & Grammar / 5Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics

    and

    word usage are correct

    and consistent with

    American English.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics,

    and word usage are

    adequate and consistent

    with American English.

    errors do not interfere

    with meaning or

    understanding.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics,

    and word usage are

    distracting and could

    interfere with meaning

    or understanding.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics

    and/or

    word usage interfere

    with understanding and

    do not reflect scholarly

    writing.

    Level 4
    14 points minimum

    Level 3
    11 points minimum

    Level 2
    8 points minimum

    Level 1
    5 points minimum

    **## Discussion1.docx**

    500 words initial post

    Both Cohen's Model of Basic Student Socialization and Benner's Stages of Nursing Proficiency offer insightful frameworks for understanding the development of students and professionals in the field of nursing. Cohen's model focuses on the socialization process of nursing students into the profession, highlighting key stages such as Unilateral Dependence, Negativity/Independence, and Team Dependence. On the other hand, Benner's stages outline the progression of nursing proficiency from Novice to Expert, emphasizing the acquisition of skills, knowledge, and clinical judgment over time.

    •    Why do you think it is important for you to understand the process of socialization in the profession of nursing?
    •    How do Cohen's stages of basic student socialization align with your own experiences or observations as a nursing student?
    •    Reflect on your journey through Benner's stages of nursing proficiency. Which stage do you currently identify with, and what challenges or breakthroughs have you encountered along the way?
    •    How do these two models complement each other in shaping the professional identity and practice of nurses? Are there any areas that overlap? Any areas of clear separation?

    **## Rubric.pdf**

    RNSG 2121 Discussion Board Grading Rubric
    Course: 2025SP-RNSG-2121-72201-Nurse Leadership & Management

    Criteria
    Level 4
    40 points

    Level 3
    30 points

    Level 2
    20 points

    Level 1
    10 points

    Criterion Score

    Initial Post Content / 40Initial posting is rich in

    content full of thought,

    insight, and analysis.

    Posting thoroughly

    answers the discussion

    prompts and

    demonstrates

    understanding of

    material with well-

    developed ideas. Posting

    integrates assigned

    content and makes

    strong connections to

    practice.

    Initial posting has

    substantial information.

    Thought, insight, and

    analysis have taken

    place.

    Posting addresses most

    of the prompt(s) and

    demonstrates mild

    understanding of

    material with well-

    developed ideas. Posting

    references assigned

    content and may not

    make connections to

    practice.

    Initial posting is

    generally competent.

    Information is thin and

    commonplace.

    Posting fails to address

    all components of the

    prompt. Makes short or

    irrelevant remarks.

    Posting lacks connection

    to practice.

    Initial posting is not

    relevant or no subject

    matter knowledge is

    evident.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    10 points

    Level 3
    8 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Initial Post Submission / 10Fully answers the

    prompt by

    Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

    of the week assigned.

    Initial posting contains

    at least 2 references.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    Fully answers the

    prompt by Friday (11:59

    p.m. CST) of the week

    assigned. Initial posting

    contains less than 2

    references.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    Fully answers the

    prompt by

    Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

    of the week assigned.

    No references included.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    No initial posting by

    Friday (11:59 pm CST)

    or posting is less than

    the minimum of 500

    words.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    20 points

    Level 3
    15 points

    Level 2
    10 points

    Level 1
    5 points

    Criterion Score

    Peer Responses / 20Provides a minimum of

    two substantive peer

    replies with reference by

    Monday 11:59 pm. A

    minimum of one (1)

    reference is required per

    peer reply.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    Provides replies to two

    peers with simple

    comments and/or

    reference(s) not

    provided by Monday

    11:59 pm. A minimum of

    one (1) reference is

    required for each peer

    reply.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    Provides only one peer

    reply by Monday 11:59

    pm. Appropriate

    references are not

    included on both peer

    responses.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    No replies to peer

    postings or postings are

    less than the minimum

    of 250 words.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    15 points

    Level 3
    10 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    APA Format / 15Correct APA format of

    in-text citations (within

    the body of the posting)

    and references (in the

    list). Both are required

    to earn any points.

    1- 2 APA errors. 3-4 APA errors. No use of APA format or

    5+ errors.

    Criteria
    Level 3
    10 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    References / 10All references are relevant,

    scholarly, and within last 5

    years.

    Some references are not

    relevant, scholarly, or more

    than 5 years old.

    No use of references.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    5 points

    Level 3
    3.5 points

    Level 2
    2 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Spelling & Grammar / 5Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics

    and

    word usage are correct

    and consistent with

    American English.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics,

    and word usage are

    adequate and consistent

    with American English.

    errors do not interfere

    with meaning or

    understanding.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics,

    and word usage are

    distracting and could

    interfere with meaning

    or understanding.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics

    and/or

    word usage interfere

    with understanding and

    do not reflect scholarly

    writing.

    Level 4
    14 points minimum

    Level 3
    11 points minimum

    Level 2
    8 points minimum

    Level 1
    5 points minimum

    **## Discussion1.docx**

    500 words initial post

    Both Cohen's Model of Basic Student Socialization and Benner's Stages of Nursing Proficiency offer insightful frameworks for understanding the development of students and professionals in the field of nursing. Cohen's model focuses on the socialization process of nursing students into the profession, highlighting key stages such as Unilateral Dependence, Negativity/Independence, and Team Dependence. On the other hand, Benner's stages outline the progression of nursing proficiency from Novice to Expert, emphasizing the acquisition of skills, knowledge, and clinical judgment over time.

    •    Why do you think it is important for you to understand the process of socialization in the profession of nursing?
    •    How do Cohen's stages of basic student socialization align with your own experiences or observations as a nursing student?
    •    Reflect on your journey through Benner's stages of nursing proficiency. Which stage do you currently identify with, and what challenges or breakthroughs have you encountered along the way?
    •    How do these two models complement each other in shaping the professional identity and practice of nurses? Are there any areas that overlap? Any areas of clear separation?

    **## Rubric.pdf**

    RNSG 2121 Discussion Board Grading Rubric
    Course: 2025SP-RNSG-2121-72201-Nurse Leadership & Management

    Criteria
    Level 4
    40 points

    Level 3
    30 points

    Level 2
    20 points

    Level 1
    10 points

    Criterion Score

    Initial Post Content / 40Initial posting is rich in

    content full of thought,

    insight, and analysis.

    Posting thoroughly

    answers the discussion

    prompts and

    demonstrates

    understanding of

    material with well-

    developed ideas. Posting

    integrates assigned

    content and makes

    strong connections to

    practice.

    Initial posting has

    substantial information.

    Thought, insight, and

    analysis have taken

    place.

    Posting addresses most

    of the prompt(s) and

    demonstrates mild

    understanding of

    material with well-

    developed ideas. Posting

    references assigned

    content and may not

    make connections to

    practice.

    Initial posting is

    generally competent.

    Information is thin and

    commonplace.

    Posting fails to address

    all components of the

    prompt. Makes short or

    irrelevant remarks.

    Posting lacks connection

    to practice.

    Initial posting is not

    relevant or no subject

    matter knowledge is

    evident.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    10 points

    Level 3
    8 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Initial Post Submission / 10Fully answers the

    prompt by

    Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

    of the week assigned.

    Initial posting contains

    at least 2 references.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    Fully answers the

    prompt by Friday (11:59

    p.m. CST) of the week

    assigned. Initial posting

    contains less than 2

    references.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    Fully answers the

    prompt by

    Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

    of the week assigned.

    No references included.

    *Initial post must be a

    minimum of 500 words.

    No initial posting by

    Friday (11:59 pm CST)

    or posting is less than

    the minimum of 500

    words.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    20 points

    Level 3
    15 points

    Level 2
    10 points

    Level 1
    5 points

    Criterion Score

    Peer Responses / 20Provides a minimum of

    two substantive peer

    replies with reference by

    Monday 11:59 pm. A

    minimum of one (1)

    reference is required per

    peer reply.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    Provides replies to two

    peers with simple

    comments and/or

    reference(s) not

    provided by Monday

    11:59 pm. A minimum of

    one (1) reference is

    required for each peer

    reply.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    Provides only one peer

    reply by Monday 11:59

    pm. Appropriate

    references are not

    included on both peer

    responses.

    *Each peer reply must

    be a minimum of 250

    words.

    No replies to peer

    postings or postings are

    less than the minimum

    of 250 words.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    15 points

    Level 3
    10 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    APA Format / 15Correct APA format of

    in-text citations (within

    the body of the posting)

    and references (in the

    list). Both are required

    to earn any points.

    1- 2 APA errors. 3-4 APA errors. No use of APA format or

    5+ errors.

    Criteria
    Level 3
    10 points

    Level 2
    5 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    References / 10All references are relevant,

    scholarly, and within last 5

    years.

    Some references are not

    relevant, scholarly, or more

    than 5 years old.

    No use of references.

    Criteria
    Level 4
    5 points

    Level 3
    3.5 points

    Level 2
    2 points

    Level 1
    0 points

    Criterion Score

    Spelling & Grammar / 5Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics

    and

    word usage are correct

    and consistent with

    American English.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics,

    and word usage are

    adequate and consistent

    with American English.

    errors do not interfere

    with meaning or

    understanding.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics,

    and word usage are

    distracting and could

    interfere with meaning

    or understanding.

    Spelling, grammar,

    punctuation, mechanics

    and/or

    word usage interfere

    with understanding and

    do not reflect scholarly

    writing.

    Level 4
    14 points minimum

    Level 3
    11 points minimum

    Level 2
    8 points minimum

    Level 1
    5 points minimum

  • [Solved] NUR 501/600 DISCUSSION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please I need help on week 2 discussion – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## NUR501600Dis3.pdf **## NUR501600Dis3.pdf** Discussion 3 Drug Therapy & Treatments for Cardiovascular and Hematologic Disorders Based on Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the following questio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please I need help on week 2 discussion

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## NUR501600Dis3.pdf

    **## NUR501600Dis3.pdf**

    Discussion 3

    Drug Therapy & Treatments for Cardiovascular and Hematologic Disorders

    Based on Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please  answer
    the following questions:

    1. Describe the goals of drug therapy for hypertension and the different
    antihypertensive treatment.

    2. Describe types of arrhythmias and their treatment

    3. Discuss Atrial Fibrillation

    4. Discuss types of anemia, causes, symptoms, and treatment options

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

    an essay format.

    ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

    followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care

    Which learning theories and principles do you think are most useful to the advanced
    practice nurse (APN) in providing high quality health care to clients, and why?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1)

    **## NUR501600Dis3.pdf**

    Discussion 3

    Drug Therapy & Treatments for Cardiovascular and Hematologic Disorders

    Based on Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please  answer
    the following questions:

    1. Describe the goals of drug therapy for hypertension and the different
    antihypertensive treatment.

    2. Describe types of arrhythmias and their treatment

    3. Discuss Atrial Fibrillation

    4. Discuss types of anemia, causes, symptoms, and treatment options

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

    an essay format.

    ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

    followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care

    Which learning theories and principles do you think are most useful to the advanced
    practice nurse (APN) in providing high quality health care to clients, and why?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-3-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1)

  • [Solved] week 4 discussion 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Generating Potential Solutions** Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, – Read Chapter 4: Finding Solutions and Gaining Support of the course textbook _One Step at a Time:_ _A Roadmap for Problem Solving & Making a Difference._ – Review [_A Closer Look: Week 4: Identifying the Target…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Generating Potential Solutions**

    Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum,

    – Read Chapter 4: Finding Solutions and Gaining Support of the course textbook _One Step at a Time:_ _A Roadmap for Problem Solving & Making a Difference._
    – Review [_A Closer Look: Week 4: Identifying the Target Audience_](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/141283/modules/items/7190208).
    – Review [_Synthesis_Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/synthesis).
    – Review the information you have gathered over the duration of the course, including the following:
    – Results of cultural and worldview lens evaluations (Week 2)
    – Data gathered from research and evaluation using a theoretical lens (Week 3)
    – Interview results (Week 3)

    In this discussion, you will review information gathered over the duration of the course to help inform your recommendations for potential solutions to the problem.

    In your discussion post,

    – Restate the problem statement.
    – Synthesize the results of your lens evaluations, data gathered, and interview results.
    – Propose two recommendations to address the problem based on your analysis.

    Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 150 words and is due on Day 3 (Thursday)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] slide discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering slide discussion.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] one page paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Statistics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/mathematics-statistics) Submit a NOT MORE THAN one page response to the following question. Your submission must be in APA style complete with Cover and Reference (with at least one entry – the textbook) pages. Your submission will be che…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Statistics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/mathematics-statistics)

    Submit a NOT MORE THAN one page response to the following question.  Your submission must be in APA style complete with Cover and Reference (with at least one entry – the textbook) pages. Your submission will be checked for plagiarism using Turnitin.  Evidence of plagiarism will at the minimum result in an automatic '0' for the assignment. Additional penalties may be levied.  Please also see SWU policies on Academic Honesty.

    All policies of the  [Benson School of Business Writing Manual](https://swu.instructure.com/courses/1789630/pages/benson-school-of-business-writing-manual) must also be observed.

    10-64. Explain, in nontechnical terms, why pairing observations, if possible, is often a more effective tool than taking independent samples.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] idk

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ Screenshot2025-01-271.13.44PM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-271-13-44pm-png "Screenshot2025-01-271.13.44PM.png") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2025-01-271.13.44PM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-271-13-44pm-png "Screenshot2025-01-271.13.44PM.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Article Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Who is willing to do an article review? – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## ARTICLEREVIEWINSTRUCTIONS.UPDATEDSPRING2025-1.doc – ## ImprovingReadingFluency.pdf **## ARTICLEREVIEWINSTRUCTIONS.UPDATEDSPRING2025-1.doc** Name ___________________________ Date ___________…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Who is willing to do an article review?

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## ARTICLEREVIEWINSTRUCTIONS.UPDATEDSPRING2025-1.doc

    – ## ImprovingReadingFluency.pdf

    **## ARTICLEREVIEWINSTRUCTIONS.UPDATEDSPRING2025-1.doc**

    Name ___________________________ Date _______________ Score__________/15 pts

    **CEL 615 Article Review**

    Read and summarize the article provided for this review and evaluate its content. This assignment must be typed in Times New Roman, font size 12.

    **_Please use the following format and note the grading scale:_**

    ·
    **Summary (1 page)**

    · Brief summary to include the purpose of the study,

    participants, and key findings.

    · Summary should provide main idea and supporting

    details.

    ·
    **Evaluation (1/2 page)**

    · This is where you state your opinion of the article

    and justification for your opinion.

    · Do you agree with the study and findings?

    Why or why not? Justify your response.

    ·
    **Application (1/2 page)**

    · How will this apply to your classroom of

    future students? Provide 3 ways you can apply the

    information to your own classroom practices.

    · What are the implications for you as a teacher

    regarding your ELL students after reading this

    article?

    ·
    **Professionalism**

    · Correct grammar, spelling, sentence structure

    · Complete, correct bibliography

    Possible Points�

    Points Earned�

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    3

    �

    �

    �

    Total Points�

    �

    �

    **## ImprovingReadingFluency.pdf**

    Improving Reading Fluency

    Home / Answers / Ask Dr Pierson / Improving Reading Fluency

    Reading fluency is key to learning

    and comprehension from written

    texts, which is the goal of reading.

    In order to optimize reading

    comprehension skills, we need to

    set realistic reading fluency goals

    for our students with dyslexia.

    Over the past two years, the

    Journal of Learning Disabilities

    (JLD) has published a number of

    articles on the topic of reading

    fluency. Whether reading aloud or

    silently, fluent reading, defined as

    reading with speed, accuracy, and

    prosody (or expression), is key to

    comprehending text. A fluent

    reader reads with automaticity

    and does not have to attend to

    the mechanics of reading, for example, decoding. Reading is not laborious for a fluent reader, and as a result, good readers can make

    inferences from the text, make connections within the text and across texts, and gain new understandings in short learn. It is well

    documented in the literature that our students with dyslexia read more slowly than their typical-reading peers, even after they learn to

    decode text. As a result, our students with dyslexia read less text than their peers. In turn, they have less access to new vocabulary, or

    "word" knowledge, and literate language forms, and fewer opportunities to develop increased "world" knowledge; all of which contribute

    to one's ability to understand text. There is a strong correlation between reading rate and reading comprehension, particularly in the

    early years. But, how fast is fast enough when it comes to reading for our students with dyslexia?

    We have evidence in recent literature that the practice of benchmarking reading fluency goals for those with dyslexia or reading disorder

    (RD) against rates achieved by their typical-reading peers does not yield the best outcomes relative to reading comprehension. It

    behooves us to set realistic goals for our students with RD in regards to reading fluency in order to optimize reading comprehension.

    O’Conner (2018) found that reading rates of around 110 words correct per minute (wcpm) at 2nd grade and between 120-140 wcpm at

    4th grade yielded the best outcomes for reading comprehension in typical readers. (Of note, 120-140 words per minute approaches that

    of conversational speech.) On the other hand, the optimal reading rate for reading comprehension for 2nd graders with RD was between

    40 and 75 wcpm, and for 4th graders with RD, it was between 40-85 wcpm, both considerably lower than their typical-reading peers.

    Above the rates of 75 wcpm for 2nd graders and 90 wcpm for 4th graders, reading comprehension suffered. These are important data to

    keep in mind when setting reading fluency goals for our students with dyslexia.

    In regard to intervention, the practice of repeated readings (RR) has shown promise in improving both reading rate and reading

    comprehension. It is important to note that sustained silent reading (a practice in many classrooms) has not been shown to be effective

    in improving reading fluency. Students need direct instruction to make improvements in reading fluency and reading comprehension.

    Having the student first listen to the teacher orally read the passage (i.e., model phrasing and prosody) had positive outcomes in both

    reading comprehension and reducing anxiety on the part of the student (Lee & Yoon, 2017). The best outcomes occurred after hearing

    the teacher read the text aloud, followed by the student reading the text four times. Lee and Yoon “…did not find isolated word preview

    to be an essential component of RR for students with RD” (p. 221). They posited that reading vocabulary words in connected text may

    prove to be more effective than isolated word preview.

    Another way to have students with dyslexia practice RR is to have them read to younger students. To enhance reading fluency, students

    should read books in which they can decode 95-97% of the words. It can be a real challenge to find books, particularly for older

    students, that are at their reading level and don’t appear “childish.” To mitigate this, at 3LI, we often suggest that students read to

    younger children. This creates a context of authenticity. It makes sense to read “easier” text to a preschooler or kindergartner. A note of

    In addition to providing the leadership to DyslexiaHelp, Dr. Pierson is a founding partner in the Literacy, Language, and Learning Institute
    (3LI) www.3-li.org.

    caution — we always want to be mindful when pairing students so that the student with dyslexia has better reading skills than his or her

    younger partner. Ideally, the student with dyslexia should hear the book read first, then practice reading it aloud.

    Reading fluency is key to learning and comprehension from written texts, which is the goal of reading. In order to optimize reading

    comprehension skills, we need to set realistic reading fluency goals for our students with dyslexia. Goals should be achievable.

    Benchmarking reading rates for students with dyslexia against their typical-reading peers does not appear to be the best practice to

    achieve adequate comprehension of text. Upon setting achievable goals, the reading fluency skills of our students with dyslexia can be

    improved by a teacher’s (or more experienced other’s) modeling of fluent reading coupled with repeated readings of the text.

    I am indebted to my talented colleague at 3LI, Dr. Lauren Katz, for her careful review of this piece.

    **## ImprovingReadingFluency.pdf**

    Improving Reading Fluency

    Home / Answers / Ask Dr Pierson / Improving Reading Fluency

    Reading fluency is key to learning

    and comprehension from written

    texts, which is the goal of reading.

    In order to optimize reading

    comprehension skills, we need to

    set realistic reading fluency goals

    for our students with dyslexia.

    Over the past two years, the

    Journal of Learning Disabilities

    (JLD) has published a number of

    articles on the topic of reading

    fluency. Whether reading aloud or

    silently, fluent reading, defined as

    reading with speed, accuracy, and

    prosody (or expression), is key to

    comprehending text. A fluent

    reader reads with automaticity

    and does not have to attend to

    the mechanics of reading, for example, decoding. Reading is not laborious for a fluent reader, and as a result, good readers can make

    inferences from the text, make connections within the text and across texts, and gain new understandings in short learn. It is well

    documented in the literature that our students with dyslexia read more slowly than their typical-reading peers, even after they learn to

    decode text. As a result, our students with dyslexia read less text than their peers. In turn, they have less access to new vocabulary, or

    "word" knowledge, and literate language forms, and fewer opportunities to develop increased "world" knowledge; all of which contribute

    to one's ability to understand text. There is a strong correlation between reading rate and reading comprehension, particularly in the

    early years. But, how fast is fast enough when it comes to reading for our students with dyslexia?

    We have evidence in recent literature that the practice of benchmarking reading fluency goals for those with dyslexia or reading disorder

    (RD) against rates achieved by their typical-reading peers does not yield the best outcomes relative to reading comprehension. It

    behooves us to set realistic goals for our students with RD in regards to reading fluency in order to optimize reading comprehension.

    O’Conner (2018) found that reading rates of around 110 words correct per minute (wcpm) at 2nd grade and between 120-140 wcpm at

    4th grade yielded the best outcomes for reading comprehension in typical readers. (Of note, 120-140 words per minute approaches that

    of conversational speech.) On the other hand, the optimal reading rate for reading comprehension for 2nd graders with RD was between

    40 and 75 wcpm, and for 4th graders with RD, it was between 40-85 wcpm, both considerably lower than their typical-reading peers.

    Above the rates of 75 wcpm for 2nd graders and 90 wcpm for 4th graders, reading comprehension suffered. These are important data to

    keep in mind when setting reading fluency goals for our students with dyslexia.

    In regard to intervention, the practice of repeated readings (RR) has shown promise in improving both reading rate and reading

    comprehension. It is important to note that sustained silent reading (a practice in many classrooms) has not been shown to be effective

    in improving reading fluency. Students need direct instruction to make improvements in reading fluency and reading comprehension.

    Having the student first listen to the teacher orally read the passage (i.e., model phrasing and prosody) had positive outcomes in both

    reading comprehension and reducing anxiety on the part of the student (Lee & Yoon, 2017). The best outcomes occurred after hearing

    the teacher read the text aloud, followed by the student reading the text four times. Lee and Yoon “…did not find isolated word preview

    to be an essential component of RR for students with RD” (p. 221). They posited that reading vocabulary words in connected text may

    prove to be more effective than isolated word preview.

    Another way to have students with dyslexia practice RR is to have them read to younger students. To enhance reading fluency, students

    should read books in which they can decode 95-97% of the words. It can be a real challenge to find books, particularly for older

    students, that are at their reading level and don’t appear “childish.” To mitigate this, at 3LI, we often suggest that students read to

    younger children. This creates a context of authenticity. It makes sense to read “easier” text to a preschooler or kindergartner. A note of

    In addition to providing the leadership to DyslexiaHelp, Dr. Pierson is a founding partner in the Literacy, Language, and Learning Institute
    (3LI) www.3-li.org.

    caution — we always want to be mindful when pairing students so that the student with dyslexia has better reading skills than his or her

    younger partner. Ideally, the student with dyslexia should hear the book read first, then practice reading it aloud.

    Reading fluency is key to learning and comprehension from written texts, which is the goal of reading. In order to optimize reading

    comprehension skills, we need to set realistic reading fluency goals for our students with dyslexia. Goals should be achievable.

    Benchmarking reading rates for students with dyslexia against their typical-reading peers does not appear to be the best practice to

    achieve adequate comprehension of text. Upon setting achievable goals, the reading fluency skills of our students with dyslexia can be

    improved by a teacher’s (or more experienced other’s) modeling of fluent reading coupled with repeated readings of the text.

    I am indebted to my talented colleague at 3LI, Dr. Lauren Katz, for her careful review of this piece.

    **## ARTICLEREVIEWINSTRUCTIONS.UPDATEDSPRING2025-1.doc**

    Name ___________________________ Date _______________ Score__________/15 pts

    **CEL 615 Article Review**

    Read and summarize the article provided for this review and evaluate its content. This assignment must be typed in Times New Roman, font size 12.

    **_Please use the following format and note the grading scale:_**

    ·
    **Summary (1 page)**

    · Brief summary to include the purpose of the study,

    participants, and key findings.

    · Summary should provide main idea and supporting

    details.

    ·
    **Evaluation (1/2 page)**

    · This is where you state your opinion of the article

    and justification for your opinion.

    · Do you agree with the study and findings?

    Why or why not? Justify your response.

    ·
    **Application (1/2 page)**

    · How will this apply to your classroom of

    future students? Provide 3 ways you can apply the

    information to your own classroom practices.

    · What are the implications for you as a teacher

    regarding your ELL students after reading this

    article?

    ·
    **Professionalism**

    · Correct grammar, spelling, sentence structure

    · Complete, correct bibliography

    Possible Points�

    Points Earned�

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    3

    �

    �

    �

    Total Points�

    �

    �

    **## ImprovingReadingFluency.pdf**

    Improving Reading Fluency

    Home / Answers / Ask Dr Pierson / Improving Reading Fluency

    Reading fluency is key to learning

    and comprehension from written

    texts, which is the goal of reading.

    In order to optimize reading

    comprehension skills, we need to

    set realistic reading fluency goals

    for our students with dyslexia.

    Over the past two years, the

    Journal of Learning Disabilities

    (JLD) has published a number of

    articles on the topic of reading

    fluency. Whether reading aloud or

    silently, fluent reading, defined as

    reading with speed, accuracy, and

    prosody (or expression), is key to

    comprehending text. A fluent

    reader reads with automaticity

    and does not have to attend to

    the mechanics of reading, for example, decoding. Reading is not laborious for a fluent reader, and as a result, good readers can make

    inferences from the text, make connections within the text and across texts, and gain new understandings in short learn. It is well

    documented in the literature that our students with dyslexia read more slowly than their typical-reading peers, even after they learn to

    decode text. As a result, our students with dyslexia read less text than their peers. In turn, they have less access to new vocabulary, or

    "word" knowledge, and literate language forms, and fewer opportunities to develop increased "world" knowledge; all of which contribute

    to one's ability to understand text. There is a strong correlation between reading rate and reading comprehension, particularly in the

    early years. But, how fast is fast enough when it comes to reading for our students with dyslexia?

    We have evidence in recent literature that the practice of benchmarking reading fluency goals for those with dyslexia or reading disorder

    (RD) against rates achieved by their typical-reading peers does not yield the best outcomes relative to reading comprehension. It

    behooves us to set realistic goals for our students with RD in regards to reading fluency in order to optimize reading comprehension.

    O’Conner (2018) found that reading rates of around 110 words correct per minute (wcpm) at 2nd grade and between 120-140 wcpm at

    4th grade yielded the best outcomes for reading comprehension in typical readers. (Of note, 120-140 words per minute approaches that

    of conversational speech.) On the other hand, the optimal reading rate for reading comprehension for 2nd graders with RD was between

    40 and 75 wcpm, and for 4th graders with RD, it was between 40-85 wcpm, both considerably lower than their typical-reading peers.

    Above the rates of 75 wcpm for 2nd graders and 90 wcpm for 4th graders, reading comprehension suffered. These are important data to

    keep in mind when setting reading fluency goals for our students with dyslexia.

    In regard to intervention, the practice of repeated readings (RR) has shown promise in improving both reading rate and reading

    comprehension. It is important to note that sustained silent reading (a practice in many classrooms) has not been shown to be effective

    in improving reading fluency. Students need direct instruction to make improvements in reading fluency and reading comprehension.

    Having the student first listen to the teacher orally read the passage (i.e., model phrasing and prosody) had positive outcomes in both

    reading comprehension and reducing anxiety on the part of the student (Lee & Yoon, 2017). The best outcomes occurred after hearing

    the teacher read the text aloud, followed by the student reading the text four times. Lee and Yoon “…did not find isolated word preview

    to be an essential component of RR for students with RD” (p. 221). They posited that reading vocabulary words in connected text may

    prove to be more effective than isolated word preview.

    Another way to have students with dyslexia practice RR is to have them read to younger students. To enhance reading fluency, students

    should read books in which they can decode 95-97% of the words. It can be a real challenge to find books, particularly for older

    students, that are at their reading level and don’t appear “childish.” To mitigate this, at 3LI, we often suggest that students read to

    younger children. This creates a context of authenticity. It makes sense to read “easier” text to a preschooler or kindergartner. A note of

    In addition to providing the leadership to DyslexiaHelp, Dr. Pierson is a founding partner in the Literacy, Language, and Learning Institute
    (3LI) www.3-li.org.

    caution — we always want to be mindful when pairing students so that the student with dyslexia has better reading skills than his or her

    younger partner. Ideally, the student with dyslexia should hear the book read first, then practice reading it aloud.

    Reading fluency is key to learning and comprehension from written texts, which is the goal of reading. In order to optimize reading

    comprehension skills, we need to set realistic reading fluency goals for our students with dyslexia. Goals should be achievable.

    Benchmarking reading rates for students with dyslexia against their typical-reading peers does not appear to be the best practice to

    achieve adequate comprehension of text. Upon setting achievable goals, the reading fluency skills of our students with dyslexia can be

    improved by a teacher’s (or more experienced other’s) modeling of fluent reading coupled with repeated readings of the text.

    I am indebted to my talented colleague at 3LI, Dr. Lauren Katz, for her careful review of this piece.

    **## ARTICLEREVIEWINSTRUCTIONS.UPDATEDSPRING2025-1.doc**

    Name ___________________________ Date _______________ Score__________/15 pts

    **CEL 615 Article Review**

    Read and summarize the article provided for this review and evaluate its content. This assignment must be typed in Times New Roman, font size 12.

    **_Please use the following format and note the grading scale:_**

    ·
    **Summary (1 page)**

    · Brief summary to include the purpose of the study,

    participants, and key findings.

    · Summary should provide main idea and supporting

    details.

    ·
    **Evaluation (1/2 page)**

    · This is where you state your opinion of the article

    and justification for your opinion.

    · Do you agree with the study and findings?

    Why or why not? Justify your response.

    ·
    **Application (1/2 page)**

    · How will this apply to your classroom of

    future students? Provide 3 ways you can apply the

    information to your own classroom practices.

    · What are the implications for you as a teacher

    regarding your ELL students after reading this

    article?

    ·
    **Professionalism**

    · Correct grammar, spelling, sentence structure

    · Complete, correct bibliography

    Possible Points�

    Points Earned�

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    4

    �

    �

    �

    3

    �

    �

    �

    Total Points�

    �

    �

    **## ImprovingReadingFluency.pdf**

    Improving Reading Fluency

    Home / Answers / Ask Dr Pierson / Improving Reading Fluency

    Reading fluency is key to learning

    and comprehension from written

    texts, which is the goal of reading.

    In order to optimize reading

    comprehension skills, we need to

    set realistic reading fluency goals

    for our students with dyslexia.

    Over the past two years, the

    Journal of Learning Disabilities

    (JLD) has published a number of

    articles on the topic of reading

    fluency. Whether reading aloud or

    silently, fluent reading, defined as

    reading with speed, accuracy, and

    prosody (or expression), is key to

    comprehending text. A fluent

    reader reads with automaticity

    and does not have to attend to

    the mechanics of reading, for example, decoding. Reading is not laborious for a fluent reader, and as a result, good readers can make

    inferences from the text, make connections within the text and across texts, and gain new understandings in short learn. It is well

    documented in the literature that our students with dyslexia read more slowly than their typical-reading peers, even after they learn to

    decode text. As a result, our students with dyslexia read less text than their peers. In turn, they have less access to new vocabulary, or

    "word" knowledge, and literate language forms, and fewer opportunities to develop increased "world" knowledge; all of which contribute

    to one's ability to understand text. There is a strong correlation between reading rate and reading comprehension, particularly in the

    early years. But, how fast is fast enough when it comes to reading for our students with dyslexia?

    We have evidence in recent literature that the practice of benchmarking reading fluency goals for those with dyslexia or reading disorder

    (RD) against rates achieved by their typical-reading peers does not yield the best outcomes relative to reading comprehension. It

    behooves us to set realistic goals for our students with RD in regards to reading fluency in order to optimize reading comprehension.

    O’Conner (2018) found that reading rates of around 110 words correct per minute (wcpm) at 2nd grade and between 120-140 wcpm at

    4th grade yielded the best outcomes for reading comprehension in typical readers. (Of note, 120-140 words per minute approaches that

    of conversational speech.) On the other hand, the optimal reading rate for reading comprehension for 2nd graders with RD was between

    40 and 75 wcpm, and for 4th graders with RD, it was between 40-85 wcpm, both considerably lower than their typical-reading peers.

    Above the rates of 75 wcpm for 2nd graders and 90 wcpm for 4th graders, reading comprehension suffered. These are important data to

    keep in mind when setting reading fluency goals for our students with dyslexia.

    In regard to intervention, the practice of repeated readings (RR) has shown promise in improving both reading rate and reading

    comprehension. It is important to note that sustained silent reading (a practice in many classrooms) has not been shown to be effective

    in improving reading fluency. Students need direct instruction to make improvements in reading fluency and reading comprehension.

    Having the student first listen to the teacher orally read the passage (i.e., model phrasing and prosody) had positive outcomes in both

    reading comprehension and reducing anxiety on the part of the student (Lee & Yoon, 2017). The best outcomes occurred after hearing

    the teacher read the text aloud, followed by the student reading the text four times. Lee and Yoon “…did not find isolated word preview

    to be an essential component of RR for students with RD” (p. 221). They posited that reading vocabulary words in connected text may

    prove to be more effective than isolated word preview.

    Another way to have students with dyslexia practice RR is to have them read to younger students. To enhance reading fluency, students

    should read books in which they can decode 95-97% of the words. It can be a real challenge to find books, particularly for older

    students, that are at their reading level and don’t appear “childish.” To mitigate this, at 3LI, we often suggest that students read to

    younger children. This creates a context of authenticity. It makes sense to read “easier” text to a preschooler or kindergartner. A note of

    In addition to providing the leadership to DyslexiaHelp, Dr. Pierson is a founding partner in the Literacy, Language, and Learning Institute
    (3LI) www.3-li.org.

    caution — we always want to be mindful when pairing students so that the student with dyslexia has better reading skills than his or her

    younger partner. Ideally, the student with dyslexia should hear the book read first, then practice reading it aloud.

    Reading fluency is key to learning and comprehension from written texts, which is the goal of reading. In order to optimize reading

    comprehension skills, we need to set realistic reading fluency goals for our students with dyslexia. Goals should be achievable.

    Benchmarking reading rates for students with dyslexia against their typical-reading peers does not appear to be the best practice to

    achieve adequate comprehension of text. Upon setting achievable goals, the reading fluency skills of our students with dyslexia can be

    improved by a teacher’s (or more experienced other’s) modeling of fluent reading coupled with repeated readings of the text.

    I am indebted to my talented colleague at 3LI, Dr. Lauren Katz, for her careful review of this piece.

  • [Solved] assistance needed english

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## lu07_assignment_new2.pdf **## lu07_assignment_new2.pdf** ENG 105: Composition I Essay Assignment Page 1 of 2 Textual Analysis Assignment Sheet After spending time analyzing advertisements last week, you know that advertisers carefully think …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## lu07_assignment_new2.pdf

    **## lu07_assignment_new2.pdf**

    ENG 105: Composition I Essay Assignment

    Page 1 of 2

    Textual Analysis Assignment Sheet

    After spending time analyzing advertisements last week, you know that advertisers carefully think

    through and skillfully design both the visual and written elements of advertisements in order to put

    forward both explicit and implicit arguments. You shouldn’t be surprised, then, to learn that authors

    also employ rhetorical appeals and think through their rhetorical choices in order to impact their

    audiences in a desired manner. Whether they’re seeking to inform, persuade, or even entertain their

    readers, authors carefully analyze their audience and choose research, examples, organization, tone,

    and even language accordingly. To help recognize and contemplate the rhetoric of written texts, you will

    write a Textual Analysis Essay about an assigned professional essay.

    The Textual Analysis Essay will ask you to analyze an author’s methods and the effectiveness of those

    methods. After reading and thinking about EITHER bell hooks’ “Seeing and Making Culture: Representing

    the Poor” OR Carol Dweck’s “From Mindset: The New Psychology of Success,” you will write a paper

    exploring the ways in which the author uses rhetoric to accomplish her purpose. Through investigating

    the author’s methods and the impact of those methods on her audience and purpose, you will gain

    critical thinking and reading skills which should help you recognize faulty arguments in others’ writing

    and improve the effectiveness of your own writing.

    Assignment Guidelines

    Essays for Analysis: Please note that you only have these two essay options for this assignment:

     “Seeing and Making Culture: Representing the Poor” by bell hooks (Inquiry 573)

     “From Mindset: The New Psychology of Success” by Carol Dweck (Inquiry 668)

    Title: The title should be creative and representative not just of the basic topic of the paper, but also of

    the major point being made in the paper.

    Introduction: Your introduction should include the following two components:

    1. A paragraph leading us into the topic and context. Please look at Inquiry or the sample

    student papers for ideas about introduction methods.

    2. A paragraph summarizing the professional text you will analyze. Before readers can

    understand the significance of your analysis, they will need an overview of the professional

    source’s purpose, thesis, and main points. Your summary paragraph should follow the guidelines

    laid out in Rules and Learning Units 3 and 4, and should include the following:

    a. A statement of the author’s full name and the essay’s full title as well as a very

    general statement of the essay’s major argument in the first sentence.

    b. An overview of the major claims and tone used to support the essay’s argument.

    c. A transitional bridge into and statement of your essay’s thesis.

    ENG 105: Composition I Essay Assignment

    Page 2 of 2

    Thesis Statement: The thesis statement should present an arguable claim about the effectiveness of the

    professional essay’s methods and arguments. Your thesis statement should make a claim about the way

    the essay is written and how the author’s methods impact his argument, NOT just respond in agreement

    or disagreement with the author’s argument.

    Analysis Section (Body): Your essay’s analysis section will support the thesis by analyzing how the

    professional author’s methods and content appeal to the audience and impact the effectiveness of her

    argument. The bulk of your essay should focus on analysis, so this section will fill at least two to three

    full pages of your essay.

    Conclusion: The conclusion should reiterate the main point of your essay by restating the thesis in

    different words and tying together the claims made throughout your essay in final support of your

    judgment (thesis statement). Please use one of the examples from Inquiry as a model for your

    conclusion.

    Outside Sources: No outside research is allowed. Do not read or bring in outside ideas or statistics. The

    analysis should be based on your own reading of and insight into your chosen essay.

    Source Integration and Documentation: You will need to follow MLA conventions for source integration

    and documentation. You will also be required to integrate the following:

    1. At least two quotations from your chosen essay.

    2. At least one paraphrase of one of the author’s ideas.

    Style: Avoid using the first person (I, we, us, my, our) and the second person (you, your). In this essay,

    you should not have any reason to use first or second person point of view.

    Format: Standard MLA formatting; double spaced; 12 point, Times New Roman font; one-inch margins;

    Works Cited page.

    Length: 4-6 pages, double spaced (not including the Works Cited Page.)

    © Kara Wilson and Indian Hills Community College

    **## lu07_assignment_new2.pdf**

    ENG 105: Composition I Essay Assignment

    Page 1 of 2

    Textual Analysis Assignment Sheet

    After spending time analyzing advertisements last week, you know that advertisers carefully think

    through and skillfully design both the visual and written elements of advertisements in order to put

    forward both explicit and implicit arguments. You shouldn’t be surprised, then, to learn that authors

    also employ rhetorical appeals and think through their rhetorical choices in order to impact their

    audiences in a desired manner. Whether they’re seeking to inform, persuade, or even entertain their

    readers, authors carefully analyze their audience and choose research, examples, organization, tone,

    and even language accordingly. To help recognize and contemplate the rhetoric of written texts, you will

    write a Textual Analysis Essay about an assigned professional essay.

    The Textual Analysis Essay will ask you to analyze an author’s methods and the effectiveness of those

    methods. After reading and thinking about EITHER bell hooks’ “Seeing and Making Culture: Representing

    the Poor” OR Carol Dweck’s “From Mindset: The New Psychology of Success,” you will write a paper

    exploring the ways in which the author uses rhetoric to accomplish her purpose. Through investigating

    the author’s methods and the impact of those methods on her audience and purpose, you will gain

    critical thinking and reading skills which should help you recognize faulty arguments in others’ writing

    and improve the effectiveness of your own writing.

    Assignment Guidelines

    Essays for Analysis: Please note that you only have these two essay options for this assignment:

     “Seeing and Making Culture: Representing the Poor” by bell hooks (Inquiry 573)

     “From Mindset: The New Psychology of Success” by Carol Dweck (Inquiry 668)

    Title: The title should be creative and representative not just of the basic topic of the paper, but also of

    the major point being made in the paper.

    Introduction: Your introduction should include the following two components:

    1. A paragraph leading us into the topic and context. Please look at Inquiry or the sample

    student papers for ideas about introduction methods.

    2. A paragraph summarizing the professional text you will analyze. Before readers can

    understand the significance of your analysis, they will need an overview of the professional

    source’s purpose, thesis, and main points. Your summary paragraph should follow the guidelines

    laid out in Rules and Learning Units 3 and 4, and should include the following:

    a. A statement of the author’s full name and the essay’s full title as well as a very

    general statement of the essay’s major argument in the first sentence.

    b. An overview of the major claims and tone used to support the essay’s argument.

    c. A transitional bridge into and statement of your essay’s thesis.

    ENG 105: Composition I Essay Assignment

    Page 2 of 2

    Thesis Statement: The thesis statement should present an arguable claim about the effectiveness of the

    professional essay’s methods and arguments. Your thesis statement should make a claim about the way

    the essay is written and how the author’s methods impact his argument, NOT just respond in agreement

    or disagreement with the author’s argument.

    Analysis Section (Body): Your essay’s analysis section will support the thesis by analyzing how the

    professional author’s methods and content appeal to the audience and impact the effectiveness of her

    argument. The bulk of your essay should focus on analysis, so this section will fill at least two to three

    full pages of your essay.

    Conclusion: The conclusion should reiterate the main point of your essay by restating the thesis in

    different words and tying together the claims made throughout your essay in final support of your

    judgment (thesis statement). Please use one of the examples from Inquiry as a model for your

    conclusion.

    Outside Sources: No outside research is allowed. Do not read or bring in outside ideas or statistics. The

    analysis should be based on your own reading of and insight into your chosen essay.

    Source Integration and Documentation: You will need to follow MLA conventions for source integration

    and documentation. You will also be required to integrate the following:

    1. At least two quotations from your chosen essay.

    2. At least one paraphrase of one of the author’s ideas.

    Style: Avoid using the first person (I, we, us, my, our) and the second person (you, your). In this essay,

    you should not have any reason to use first or second person point of view.

    Format: Standard MLA formatting; double spaced; 12 point, Times New Roman font; one-inch margins;

    Works Cited page.

    Length: 4-6 pages, double spaced (not including the Works Cited Page.)

    © Kara Wilson and Indian Hills Community College

  • [Solved] Prof Double R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Marketing homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-marketing) ## MBA 580 Module Four Benchmark Study Guidelines and Rubric ### Overview In Milestone One, you recommended an innovation option (incremental or discontinuous) to the organization from the course scenario. Now t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Marketing homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-marketing)

    ## MBA 580 Module Four Benchmark Study Guidelines and Rubric

    ### Overview

    In Milestone One, you recommended an innovation option (incremental or discontinuous) to the organization from the course scenario. Now that senior management of this organization has approved your recommendation, your task is to ensure your recommended innovation option gets implemented effectively and efficiently. Remember that your perspective is still that of a middle manager for one of the top U.S. producers of luxury and mass-market automobiles and trucks.

    In this assignment, you will read a case study and write a report that compares the organization’s innovation processes with 3M’s processes. This report will help your cross-functional team identify the organization's process gaps when implementing IoT in the product line and will help to eliminate potential process inefficiencies.

    ### Prompt

    Using the information in the overview above and referring to the _3M: Rethinking Innovation_ case study (UPLOADED BELOW) in this module’s resources, compare the organization from the course scenario with 3M and identify process gaps within the organization. Your study should include the following points:

    1. **Analyze 3M’s experience for a process-based approach toward innovation.**
    1. How does 3M manage innovation?
    2. What is the innovation strategy and leadership style within 3M?
    3. How does 3M enable the innovation process?
    2. **Identify significant features or processes that promote innovation from the case study.**
    1. How does the management team within 3M recognize and reward employees?
    2. What is the importance of permission to play within 3M?
    3. How do the 3M attributes of patience and acceptance of mistakes enhance an innovative culture?
    3. **Compare the organization from the course scenario with 3M.** You will need to reference the [Organization Overview](https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/1838213-MBA-580-10960.202517-1/Course%20Documents/MBA%20580%20Organization%20Overview.pdf?ou=1838213) document when comparing the two companies.

    1. What are the differences between the two organizational structures?
    2. What is the difference in formal and informal innovation management?
    3. How does the organizational structure in each company affect communication? Why is this important to innovation?
    4. **Identify the process gaps of the organization.**You will need to reference the Organization Overview document when identifying process gaps.

    1. What needs to be done to make the organizational structure support innovation?
    2. What rewards could your organization utilize to motivate innovative behavior?
    3. How should your organization examine its timeline to identify ways for longer-term projects to be more successful?

    ### What to Submit

    Submit a 2- to 3-page Word document using 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. If references are included, they should be cited according to APA style.

    ASSIGNMENT

    ## MBA 580 Module Four Video Check-In Guidelines and Rubric

    ### Overview

    In this course, the learner-faculty video check-in assignments will be used for discussing the Milestone One, Milestone Two, and project guidelines. These are private conversations between you and your instructor, and you are encouraged to deeply explore the concepts presented. Be sure to reach out to your instructor so that any concerns and questions are addressed prior to when Milestone Two is due. In Milestone Two, you will create a strategic plan for the implementation of an IoT innovation. Discuss your progress and concerns with your instructor through this video submission.

    ### Prompt

    In this mentor-focused video check-in, look at the [Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric](https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1838213&type=content&rcode=snhu-3226189) and have an asynchronous discussion with your instructor regarding the points listed below.

    Record a short video sharing your understanding of the guidelines to be followed for Milestone Two. Consider the following questions:

    – Do you feel comfortable completing the Power BI aspects of Milestone Two?
    – What are your current thoughts on your recommendations for a strategic plan?
    – What are your current thoughts on competitors’ relative strengths in the marketplace?
    – Describe some of the ways the company from the course scenario could adjust if business conditions change.
    – How could business conditions change?
    – How could the company change its strategic plan?

    If you have any questions or require additional support, clearly communicate your needs to your instructor.

    ### What to Submit

    submit this assignment in an 1- to 2-slide PowerPoint presentation.

    – [\
    \
    Cases0-C_ManagingInnovation.html](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cases0-c-managinginnovation-html "Cases0-C_ManagingInnovation.html")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] enhanced interrogation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    discussion reply – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    discussion reply

    – 2 years ago