Executive Solution Overview
**files (1)** – ## Module5Discussioninstructions.docx **## Module5Discussioninstructions.docx** **Module 5 Discussion** **_Creating an Abstract_** **Directions:** After studying [Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.in…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## Module5Discussioninstructions.docx
**## Module5Discussioninstructions.docx**
**Module 5 Discussion**
**_Creating an Abstract_**
**Directions:**
After studying
[Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/54916/pages/module-5-lecture-materials-and-resources), discuss the following:
**Part I:** Describe the components of an abstract.
· Share your abstract draft and provide feedback to peers on their abstracts.
· Include one (1 ) positive and one (1) room for improvement.
· Focus on the following for a quality abstract:
· Clarity and conciseness- It is easy to understand.
· Completeness- Covers all the essential elements of the project.
· Effectiveness- Captures the attention of the reader.
· Significance- Addresses the reason and significance of the project to practice or patient outcomes.
**Part II:** Briefly describe cultural influence on continuous quality improvement in healthcare settings.
**Submission Requirements:**
· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style.
· All paragraphs must have 5 sentences.
· All references must be cited.
· All references must have “doi”, if applicable.
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism, Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%.
**Grading Rubric**
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric, which is found by clicking the three dots in the upper right-hand corner and selecting "show rubric" from the menu.
**Discussion Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Discussion Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
| **Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts** | **Distinguished**<br>Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.<br>**5 to >4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.<br>**3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. Or nothing was posted.<br>**0 pts** | Criterion Score<br>/5 pts |
| **Comment** |
| **Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**1 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was posted.<br>**0 pts** | Criterion Score<br>/3 pts |
| **Comment** |
| **Peer Responses** | **Distinguished**<br>Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.<br>**1 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provided no response to a peer's post.<br>**0 pts** | Criterion Score<br>/2 pts |
| **Comment** |
## image1.png
**## Module5Discussioninstructions.docx**
**Module 5 Discussion**
**_Creating an Abstract_**
**Directions:**
After studying
[Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/54916/pages/module-5-lecture-materials-and-resources), discuss the following:
**Part I:** Describe the components of an abstract.
· Share your abstract draft and provide feedback to peers on their abstracts.
· Include one (1 ) positive and one (1) room for improvement.
· Focus on the following for a quality abstract:
· Clarity and conciseness- It is easy to understand.
· Completeness- Covers all the essential elements of the project.
· Effectiveness- Captures the attention of the reader.
· Significance- Addresses the reason and significance of the project to practice or patient outcomes.
**Part II:** Briefly describe cultural influence on continuous quality improvement in healthcare settings.
**Submission Requirements:**
· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style.
· All paragraphs must have 5 sentences.
· All references must be cited.
· All references must have “doi”, if applicable.
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism, Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%.
**Grading Rubric**
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric, which is found by clicking the three dots in the upper right-hand corner and selecting "show rubric" from the menu.
**Discussion Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Discussion Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
| **Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts** | **Distinguished**<br>Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.<br>**5 to >4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.<br>**4 to >3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.<br>**3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. Or nothing was posted.<br>**0 pts** | Criterion Score<br>/5 pts |
| **Comment** |
| **Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**1 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was posted.<br>**0 pts** | Criterion Score<br>/3 pts |
| **Comment** |
| **Peer Responses** | **Distinguished**<br>Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.<br>**1 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provided no response to a peer's post.<br>**0 pts** | Criterion Score<br>/2 pts |
| **Comment** |
## image1.png
Leave a Reply