Category: Education

  • [Solved] RTI & EBP/Effective and Ineffective Strategies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You will complete this assignment using your Assignment 1 as a starting point. You will expand upon the literature you examined in Assignment 1 and identify 3 effective and 3 ineffective strategies or practices. – [\ \ Assignment2..docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment2-docx-10577567 "…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You will complete this assignment using your Assignment 1 as a starting point.  You will expand upon the literature you examined in Assignment 1 and identify 3 effective and 3 ineffective strategies or practices.

    – [\
    \
    Assignment2..docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment2-docx-10577567 "Assignment2..docx")
    – [\
    \
    Assignment2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment2-docx-10577569 "Assignment2.docx")

  • [Solved] Need Assistance with Co Teaching Collaborative

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need Assistance with Co Teaching Collaborative

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need Assistance with Co Teaching Collaborative

  • [Solved] Constructive Responses

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See Attachments – [\ \ IMG_5036.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5036-png-10577893 "IMG_5036.png") – [\ \ IMG_5035.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5035-png-10577895 "IMG_5035.png") – [\ \ IMG_5034.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5034-png-10577897 "IMG_5034.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See Attachments

    – [\
    \
    IMG_5036.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5036-png-10577893 "IMG_5036.png")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_5035.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5035-png-10577895 "IMG_5035.png")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_5034.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5034-png-10577897 "IMG_5034.png")

  • [Solved] Education Unit 5 writing Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Chapter 5 of _Leverage Leadership 2.0_ contains suggestions for improving student culture in the school. Review the following documents: 2A Leading Effective Student Culture One Pager, 3B Student Culture Vision In-Class Routine, 6A Leading Student Culture – Morning Routines, Positive Framing – Preci…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Chapter 5 of _Leverage Leadership 2.0_ contains suggestions for improving student culture in the school.  Review the following documents:  2A Leading Effective Student Culture One Pager,  3B Student Culture Vision In-Class Routine, 6A Leading Student Culture – Morning Routines, Positive Framing – Precise Praise, 7A The Classroom You Want, and 6A Student Culture Rubric.  Rate your school using 6A Student Culture Rubric.  Discuss the rating given to your school AND how paying attention to school culture helps students build the habits of mind that allow learning to take place.  How would using a rubric like the one reviewed help your school pinpoint the habits that are valued and worthy of cultivation?  Use evidence from the text to support your answer.  Tie in evidence from the Schmoker book, _Leading with Focus_, to further support your answer

  • [Solved] Literature Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (4)** – ## TheoreticalFramework.docx – ## AnnotatedBibliography.docx – Screenshot_20260721_115909_Canvas.jpg – Screenshot_20260721_132421_Gallery.jpg **## TheoreticalFramework.docx** 2 **Theoretical Framework** The problem of teacher retention in the United States is grounded in the Se…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (4)**

    – ## TheoreticalFramework.docx

    – ## AnnotatedBibliography.docx

    – Screenshot_20260721_115909_Canvas.jpg
    – Screenshot_20260721_132421_Gallery.jpg

    **## TheoreticalFramework.docx**

    2

    **Theoretical Framework**

    The problem of teacher retention in the United States is grounded in the Self-Determination Theory. This theory was originally developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan in 1985. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) may help explain the high teacher turnover problem, as well as the difficulty of retaining qualified teachers in schools, especially in the high-needs urban and underserved areas. The researchers introduced this theory to help explain behavior and well-being across multiple domains, for example, education and health care. According to Ryan and Deci (2020), Self-Determination Theory posits that the satisfaction of innate, universal, psychological needs influences motivation and well-being. These psychological needs are autonomy (individuals’ wish to be the source of their own behaviors and decisions), competence (the wish to be successful in their own behaviors), and relatedness (the wish to be and to feel that one belongs to a network of others).

    SDT has important ideas which help explain the retention of teachers. Teachers are more likely to be satisfied and to stay in the teaching profession when they feel they have autonomy in teaching and classroom decisions, and when they have a sense of competence as a result of the participation of helpful students and as a result of positive relationships with colleagues, administration, and students (Ryan & Deci, 2020). However, when these psychological needs are thwarted, such as when there is a lack of administrative support, there is a lot of bureaucracy, there are inadequate resources, and employees work in an isolated space, then teachers are more likely to experience emotional exhaustion and an increase in attrition rate (Wang et al., 2024). Tarantul and Berkovich (2025) and de Jong-Kroon et al. (2025) show that in order for the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness to increase the retention of teachers, and to provide stability to a workforce that is both functional and effective, a positive school culture is warranted.

    **References**

    de Jong-Kroon, N., Robbers, S., Vrieling-Teunter, E., & Vermeulen, M. (2025). Predicting teacher attrition in secondary education: A comparison of models that explain teacher behaviour.
    _International Journal of Educational Research Open_,
    _9_, 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100471

    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a self-determination Theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and Future Directions.
    _Contemporary Educational Psychology_,
    _61_(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

    Tarantul, A., & Berkovich, I. (2025). Self-determination theory and teachers’ motivations to perform emotional labor and emotion work: qualitative study of narratives about coping with students’ discipline problems.
    _Social Psychology of Education_,
    _28_(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09997-x

    Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, K., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Understanding teacher emotional exhaustion: exploring the role of teaching motivation, perceived autonomy, and teacher–student relationships.
    _Frontiers in Psychology_,
    _14_(14). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1342598

    **## AnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    11

    **Annotated Bibliography**

    Name

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    García, E., & Han, E. S. (2022). Teachers’ Base Salary and Districts’ Academic Performance: Evidence From National Data.
    _SAGE Open_,
    _12_(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082138

    This research reviewed the national data related to teacher base salary and turnover. The study aimed at looking at the relationship between compensation and retention and student achievement. The theoretical framework adopted by the authors are the efficiency wage theory and education production models. Participants were national K–12 teachers and districts based on the NCES and BLS data. Data were generated from the district salary data, turnover rates, and test scores. In terms of the methods, the study adopted quantitative regression analysis. The findings from the study reveal positive link between higher wages and lower turnover and increased district performance; narrowing the pay gap leads to less turnover, particularly at high-needs schools. In terms of the limitations, the study involved cross-sectional design. The strengths of the study is based on the idea that it is methodologically good with large representative data. The relevance of the study is that it promotes compensation reform as a retention tool for underserved schools.

    Ha, C., Pressley, T., & Marshall, D. T. (2025). Teacher voices matter: The role of teacher autonomy in enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating burnout.
    _PLoS ONE_,
    _20_(1), e0317471–e0317471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317471

    This research examined teacher burn out and teacher autonomy after COVID. Research aimed at investigating the moderating effects of autonomy between administrative support, job satisfaction and burnout. The author adopted self-determination theory (autonomy, competence, relatedness). The participants included in the study were 824 U.S. K–12 teachers (2021–2022). The measures adopted included online survey (validated scales). The study involved quantitative moderated mediation analysis. The outcome of the study reveal an increased autonomy correlated with increased satisfaction and decreased burnout; administrative support predicted satisfaction; 44% intended to leave in two years or less. In terms of the evaluation, the study involve a sophisticated design and limits causality in cross sections, but the strength of the national sample is good for validity. In terms of the relevance, the study connects administrative support/autonomy to being a retention lever in urban schools.

    Ingersoll, R. M., & Tran, H. (2023). Teacher shortages and turnover in rural schools in the US: An organizational analysis.
    _Educational Administration Quarterly_,
    _59_(2), 0013161X2311599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161×231159922

    This research examined the issue of teacher shortage from an organizational perspective. The method of the study involve a regression analysis that was conducted and included a log of the number of teachers and a log of the number of students teaching each teacher to determine whether working conditions or teacher supply predicted turnover. Organizational theory of schooling is used as the theoretical framework. The participants included representative sample of the nation (SASS/TFS surveys). The authors utilized secondary analysis of teacher working conditions, intentions to turn over, and principal support. The methods used were quantitative descriptive and multivariate regression. Based on the results, the organizational factors (poor admin support, limited resources, lack of influence) were more predictive of turnover than individual factors; the rate of turnover in rural schools was 50% higher than in other schools. In terms of assessment, the intensive and nationally representative; wide-ranging assessment may not focus on rural subtypes. In terms of relevance, the organizational framework is very relevant in high poverty urban areas, as leadership and conditions are a key factor in retention.

    Lochmiller, C. R., Perrone, F., & Finley, C. (2024). Understanding School Leadership’s Influence on Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Settings: An Exploratory Study in the U.S.
    _Education Sciences_,
    _14_(5), 545–545. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050545

    This study explored the types of principal behaviors that keep teachers in high-poverty schools. The focus was to develop a qualitative understanding of particular leadership actions. This book looks into the approaches of strengthening key retention factors at the school level that include administrative support, collegial relationships, and mission alignment based on the framework developed by Simon and Johnson. The participants include teachers and administrators from one high poverty elementary school with high retention (2022-2023). The authors applied semi structured interviews and document analysis. The method used was a qualitative case study, in which deductive thematic coding was applied. The study findings reveal that principals who stayed on were reaffirming mission and acknowledging teachers, creating trust, supporting families, and managing discipline well. In terms of evaluation, the deep contextual knowledge; one site does not generalize, but does provide guidance as to action. In terms of the relevance, the study recognizes explicit leadership behaviors in the field that would help keep teachers in high-poverty schools, which would directly impact proposed research on leadership.

    Martin, E. M., & Benedetti, C. (2025). Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Urban Schools: The Role of Empowerment, Leadership, and Collaboration.
    _Education and Urban Society_,
    _57_(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245251318318

    This study focuses on school-level mechanisms of retention in high poverty urban schools. Theories used in the study include teacher empowerment theory and distributed leadership theory. The participants were teachers in the highest poverty schools in the large northeastern U.S. district. The measures included survey measures of empowerment, perceptions of leadership, collaboration, and intention to stay. The methods include quantitative structural equation modeling (SEM). The outcome of the study reveal that empowerment and collaboration are significant predictors of retention intentions while instructional leadership had indirect effects via empowerment, and trusted teachers were more likely to remain. The assessment of the article shows that a combination of rigorous SEM methods; limits generalizability of single district sample, but increases direct relevance. The relevance of the study is that it identifies organizational factors associated with teacher retention in urban, high poverty schools that both reinforce empowerment and foster a collaborative culture.

    Nguyen, D., See, B. H., Brown, C., & Kokotsaki, D. (2024). Leadership for teacher retention: exploring the evidence base on why and how to support teacher autonomy, development, and voice.
    _Oxford Review of Education_,
    _52_(1), 1–21.
    [https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635](https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635)

    The purpose of this systematic review was to integrate the evidence of leadership behaviors that keep teachers. The focus is to explore the support of school leadership for retention through autonomy, development and teacher voice. Theories used are self-determination theory and distributed leadership theory. The study involve empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journal articles in public schools from January 2000 to May 2023. Systematic review with defined inclusion/exclusion criteria in various databases, five-step iterative process were used. Methods employed included qualitative synthesis of empirical studies, which is defined as screening and extraction of the data. In terms of evaluation, the study extensive, clearly explained, substantial evidence, may obscure variation around context. The study is important as it offers strong synthesis to connect proposed research to the field, the theoretical framing of principal behavior and teacher career choices in urban, high-poverty schools.

    Pressley, T., Marshall, D. T., & Moore, T. (2022).
    _Understanding Teacher Burnout Following COVID-19_.
    [https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb](https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb)

    This study determine the predictors of teacher burnout after the pandemic. The study aimed at using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model to explain burnout at the end of 2021–2022. The framework used is the JD-R model (to illustrate the imbalance between demands and resources). The participants include 779 K–12 teachers from the United States. The instruments used for data collection included online survey of job demands (workload, COVID-19 demands), job resources (admin support, autonomy) and burnout. A quantitative hierarchical regression was used in this study. The results reveal that administrative support, autonomy, and mental health were significant predictors of burnout, while learning management system use was a predictor of burnout, and these were the factors that were related to intent to leave. In terms of evaluation, the study is theoretical basis, timely, and methodologically sound. The study is important as it draws on administrative support and autonomy as buffers to burnout and directly informs proposed research on what organizational changes in urban schools might do to promote retention.

    Schmit, C. K., Lehmann, E., Swank, D., Alborn-Yilek, S., & Dannenbring, T. (2023). Teacher Retention: Retaining Teachers in High-Needs, Urban Secondary Schools in a Midwest State Post-Pandemic.
    _Deleted Journal_,
    _9_(1). https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1139

    This study explored the factors that influence retention following the pandemic in high-needs urban secondary schools. The study employed a correlational method with two types of data: qualitative and quantitative. The study found that certain factors predicted teacher satisfaction and intention to stay. In terms of the framework, none of the specified frameworks were given as an explicit name; however, it was aligned with organizational satisfaction theories. The participants utilized in the study were 385 teachers in secondary schools in high-poverty urban schools in a Midwest state. The researchers used Likert survey on satisfaction, leadership perception and retention intention. Quantitative descriptive statistics and frequency analysis (SPSS). The findings reveals 61% of the participants with intention to stay; 59% were satisfied with current school; positive perceptions about principal, peer, school culture, and administration support were related to intent to stay. The study employs simple exploratory methodology, with no theoretical framework or multiple states' data for generalizability but the timing is important as it follows the pandemic. The study is critical since it can be directly used to the recommended research. The study documents particular conditions in high needs urban learning institutions supporting or undermining the decision for the retention of the educators after COVID-19 pandemic.

    Scott, L. A., Bell, N., Dayton, M., Bowman, R. W., Evans, I., Grillo, M., Spence, C., & Layden, S. J. (2022). Special education teachers of color retention decisions: Findings from a national study.
    _Exceptional Children_,
    _89_(3), 001440292211098. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221109850

    This study explored the retention outcomes for special education teachers of color. Objectives: Determine the factors for national data that predict retention. Theories used include the critical race theory (CRT) and social capital theory. The participants include the nationally representative sample of special education teachers of color from SASS and Special Education Teacher Workforce. The instruments used were secondary analysis of national survey data on admin support, collegial climate, workload and fulfillment. Quantitative logistic regression is one of the methods adopted. The findings reveal that administrative support, collegial relationships, and professional development were most significant in predicting positive retention, while isolation, leadership that was not culturally responsive, and inequitable workloads predicted negative retention. In terms of assessment, the study reveals good inter-disciplinary analysis of an under-researched population; national data provides rigor, but is less nuanced in terms of qualitative analysis. In terms of rigor, the study is critical for proposed research's focus on diversity, highlighting what districts need to do to keep teachers of color in higher need schools.

    Steiner, E. D., Woo, A., & Doan, S. (2023, September 12).
    _All Work and No Pay — Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Pay and Hours Worked: Findings from the 2023 State of the American Teacher Survey_. Www.rand.org. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1108-9.html

    Teacher perceptions of pay and workload are explored in this study. Objective is to explore the relationship between these perceptions and well-being and retention intentions across the country. The overall approach to the framework is not specified explicitly, but based on the principles of organizational behavior and occupational health studies. The participants utilized in the study are a national sample of K-12 educators from the spring 2023 State of the American Teacher survey (N ≈ 1,400). Instruments used are national representative survey of instruments that took place once a year, and that included perceptions of compensation, work hours, well-being, and intent to stay. The methods include quantitative descriptive and correlational analysis, year by year (2021-2023) comparisons, and racial/ethnic comparisons. The study outcome is that teachers reported they worked unpaid 15 hours per week, with dissatisfaction with salary and workload being significantly related to poor well-being and intentions to leave, especially for Black teachers who saw leaving as being strongly related to poor salary conditions. In terms of assessment, the study is sound method, large, nationally representative sample; may not be able to show cause but is able to show important trends. The study is important as it offers timely research on compensation and workload in the context of the retention system in high poverty urban schools.

    **References**

    García, E., & Han, E. S. (2022). Teachers’ Base Salary and Districts’ Academic Performance: Evidence From National Data.
    _SAGE Open_,
    _12_(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082138

    Ha, C., Pressley, T., & Marshall, D. T. (2025). Teacher voices matter: The role of teacher autonomy in enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating burnout.
    _PLoS ONE_,
    _20_(1), e0317471–e0317471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317471

    Ingersoll, R. M., & Tran, H. (2023). Teacher shortages and turnover in rural schools in the US: An organizational analysis.
    _Educational Administration Quarterly_,
    _59_(2), 0013161X2311599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161×231159922

    Lochmiller, C. R., Perrone, F., & Finley, C. (2024). Understanding School Leadership’s Influence on Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Settings: An Exploratory Study in the U.S.
    _Education Sciences_,
    _14_(5), 545–545. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050545

    Martin, E. M., & Benedetti, C. (2025). Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Urban Schools: The Role of Empowerment, Leadership, and Collaboration.
    _Education and Urban Society_,
    _57_(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245251318318

    Nguyen, D., See, B. H., Brown, C., & Kokotsaki, D. (2024). Leadership for teacher retention: exploring the evidence base on why and how to support teacher autonomy, development, and voice.
    _Oxford Review of Education_,
    _52_(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635

    Pressley, T., Marshall, D. T., & Moore, T. (2022).
    _Understanding Teacher Burnout Following COVID-19_. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb

    Schmit, C. K., Lehmann, E., Swank, D., Alborn-Yilek, S., & Dannenbring, T. (2023). Teacher Retention: Retaining Teachers in High-Needs, Urban Secondary Schools in a Midwest State Post-Pandemic.
    _Deleted Journal_,
    _9_(1). https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1139

    Scott, L. A., Bell, N., Dayton, M., Bowman, R. W., Evans, I., Grillo, M., Spence, C., & Layden, S. J. (2022). Special education teachers of color retention decisions: Findings from a national study.
    _Exceptional Children_,
    _89_(3), 001440292211098. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221109850

    Steiner, E. D., Woo, A., & Doan, S. (2023, September 12).
    _All Work and No Pay — Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Pay and Hours Worked: Findings from the 2023 State of the American Teacher Survey_. Www.rand.org. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1108-9.html

    **Screenshot_20260721_115909_Canvas.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20260721-115909-canvas-jpg-10578113)

    **Screenshot_20260721_132421_Gallery.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20260721-132421-gallery-jpg)

    **Screenshot_20260721_132421_Gallery.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20260721-132421-gallery-jpg)

    **## TheoreticalFramework.docx**

    2

    **Theoretical Framework**

    The problem of teacher retention in the United States is grounded in the Self-Determination Theory. This theory was originally developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan in 1985. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) may help explain the high teacher turnover problem, as well as the difficulty of retaining qualified teachers in schools, especially in the high-needs urban and underserved areas. The researchers introduced this theory to help explain behavior and well-being across multiple domains, for example, education and health care. According to Ryan and Deci (2020), Self-Determination Theory posits that the satisfaction of innate, universal, psychological needs influences motivation and well-being. These psychological needs are autonomy (individuals’ wish to be the source of their own behaviors and decisions), competence (the wish to be successful in their own behaviors), and relatedness (the wish to be and to feel that one belongs to a network of others).

    SDT has important ideas which help explain the retention of teachers. Teachers are more likely to be satisfied and to stay in the teaching profession when they feel they have autonomy in teaching and classroom decisions, and when they have a sense of competence as a result of the participation of helpful students and as a result of positive relationships with colleagues, administration, and students (Ryan & Deci, 2020). However, when these psychological needs are thwarted, such as when there is a lack of administrative support, there is a lot of bureaucracy, there are inadequate resources, and employees work in an isolated space, then teachers are more likely to experience emotional exhaustion and an increase in attrition rate (Wang et al., 2024). Tarantul and Berkovich (2025) and de Jong-Kroon et al. (2025) show that in order for the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness to increase the retention of teachers, and to provide stability to a workforce that is both functional and effective, a positive school culture is warranted.

    **References**

    de Jong-Kroon, N., Robbers, S., Vrieling-Teunter, E., & Vermeulen, M. (2025). Predicting teacher attrition in secondary education: A comparison of models that explain teacher behaviour.
    _International Journal of Educational Research Open_,
    _9_, 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100471

    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a self-determination Theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and Future Directions.
    _Contemporary Educational Psychology_,
    _61_(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

    Tarantul, A., & Berkovich, I. (2025). Self-determination theory and teachers’ motivations to perform emotional labor and emotion work: qualitative study of narratives about coping with students’ discipline problems.
    _Social Psychology of Education_,
    _28_(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09997-x

    Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, K., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Understanding teacher emotional exhaustion: exploring the role of teaching motivation, perceived autonomy, and teacher–student relationships.
    _Frontiers in Psychology_,
    _14_(14). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1342598

    **## AnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    11

    **Annotated Bibliography**

    Name

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    García, E., & Han, E. S. (2022). Teachers’ Base Salary and Districts’ Academic Performance: Evidence From National Data.
    _SAGE Open_,
    _12_(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082138

    This research reviewed the national data related to teacher base salary and turnover. The study aimed at looking at the relationship between compensation and retention and student achievement. The theoretical framework adopted by the authors are the efficiency wage theory and education production models. Participants were national K–12 teachers and districts based on the NCES and BLS data. Data were generated from the district salary data, turnover rates, and test scores. In terms of the methods, the study adopted quantitative regression analysis. The findings from the study reveal positive link between higher wages and lower turnover and increased district performance; narrowing the pay gap leads to less turnover, particularly at high-needs schools. In terms of the limitations, the study involved cross-sectional design. The strengths of the study is based on the idea that it is methodologically good with large representative data. The relevance of the study is that it promotes compensation reform as a retention tool for underserved schools.

    Ha, C., Pressley, T., & Marshall, D. T. (2025). Teacher voices matter: The role of teacher autonomy in enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating burnout.
    _PLoS ONE_,
    _20_(1), e0317471–e0317471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317471

    This research examined teacher burn out and teacher autonomy after COVID. Research aimed at investigating the moderating effects of autonomy between administrative support, job satisfaction and burnout. The author adopted self-determination theory (autonomy, competence, relatedness). The participants included in the study were 824 U.S. K–12 teachers (2021–2022). The measures adopted included online survey (validated scales). The study involved quantitative moderated mediation analysis. The outcome of the study reveal an increased autonomy correlated with increased satisfaction and decreased burnout; administrative support predicted satisfaction; 44% intended to leave in two years or less. In terms of the evaluation, the study involve a sophisticated design and limits causality in cross sections, but the strength of the national sample is good for validity. In terms of the relevance, the study connects administrative support/autonomy to being a retention lever in urban schools.

    Ingersoll, R. M., & Tran, H. (2023). Teacher shortages and turnover in rural schools in the US: An organizational analysis.
    _Educational Administration Quarterly_,
    _59_(2), 0013161X2311599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161×231159922

    This research examined the issue of teacher shortage from an organizational perspective. The method of the study involve a regression analysis that was conducted and included a log of the number of teachers and a log of the number of students teaching each teacher to determine whether working conditions or teacher supply predicted turnover. Organizational theory of schooling is used as the theoretical framework. The participants included representative sample of the nation (SASS/TFS surveys). The authors utilized secondary analysis of teacher working conditions, intentions to turn over, and principal support. The methods used were quantitative descriptive and multivariate regression. Based on the results, the organizational factors (poor admin support, limited resources, lack of influence) were more predictive of turnover than individual factors; the rate of turnover in rural schools was 50% higher than in other schools. In terms of assessment, the intensive and nationally representative; wide-ranging assessment may not focus on rural subtypes. In terms of relevance, the organizational framework is very relevant in high poverty urban areas, as leadership and conditions are a key factor in retention.

    Lochmiller, C. R., Perrone, F., & Finley, C. (2024). Understanding School Leadership’s Influence on Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Settings: An Exploratory Study in the U.S.
    _Education Sciences_,
    _14_(5), 545–545. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050545

    This study explored the types of principal behaviors that keep teachers in high-poverty schools. The focus was to develop a qualitative understanding of particular leadership actions. This book looks into the approaches of strengthening key retention factors at the school level that include administrative support, collegial relationships, and mission alignment based on the framework developed by Simon and Johnson. The participants include teachers and administrators from one high poverty elementary school with high retention (2022-2023). The authors applied semi structured interviews and document analysis. The method used was a qualitative case study, in which deductive thematic coding was applied. The study findings reveal that principals who stayed on were reaffirming mission and acknowledging teachers, creating trust, supporting families, and managing discipline well. In terms of evaluation, the deep contextual knowledge; one site does not generalize, but does provide guidance as to action. In terms of the relevance, the study recognizes explicit leadership behaviors in the field that would help keep teachers in high-poverty schools, which would directly impact proposed research on leadership.

    Martin, E. M., & Benedetti, C. (2025). Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Urban Schools: The Role of Empowerment, Leadership, and Collaboration.
    _Education and Urban Society_,
    _57_(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245251318318

    This study focuses on school-level mechanisms of retention in high poverty urban schools. Theories used in the study include teacher empowerment theory and distributed leadership theory. The participants were teachers in the highest poverty schools in the large northeastern U.S. district. The measures included survey measures of empowerment, perceptions of leadership, collaboration, and intention to stay. The methods include quantitative structural equation modeling (SEM). The outcome of the study reveal that empowerment and collaboration are significant predictors of retention intentions while instructional leadership had indirect effects via empowerment, and trusted teachers were more likely to remain. The assessment of the article shows that a combination of rigorous SEM methods; limits generalizability of single district sample, but increases direct relevance. The relevance of the study is that it identifies organizational factors associated with teacher retention in urban, high poverty schools that both reinforce empowerment and foster a collaborative culture.

    Nguyen, D., See, B. H., Brown, C., & Kokotsaki, D. (2024). Leadership for teacher retention: exploring the evidence base on why and how to support teacher autonomy, development, and voice.
    _Oxford Review of Education_,
    _52_(1), 1–21.
    [https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635](https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635)

    The purpose of this systematic review was to integrate the evidence of leadership behaviors that keep teachers. The focus is to explore the support of school leadership for retention through autonomy, development and teacher voice. Theories used are self-determination theory and distributed leadership theory. The study involve empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journal articles in public schools from January 2000 to May 2023. Systematic review with defined inclusion/exclusion criteria in various databases, five-step iterative process were used. Methods employed included qualitative synthesis of empirical studies, which is defined as screening and extraction of the data. In terms of evaluation, the study extensive, clearly explained, substantial evidence, may obscure variation around context. The study is important as it offers strong synthesis to connect proposed research to the field, the theoretical framing of principal behavior and teacher career choices in urban, high-poverty schools.

    Pressley, T., Marshall, D. T., & Moore, T. (2022).
    _Understanding Teacher Burnout Following COVID-19_.
    [https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb](https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb)

    This study determine the predictors of teacher burnout after the pandemic. The study aimed at using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model to explain burnout at the end of 2021–2022. The framework used is the JD-R model (to illustrate the imbalance between demands and resources). The participants include 779 K–12 teachers from the United States. The instruments used for data collection included online survey of job demands (workload, COVID-19 demands), job resources (admin support, autonomy) and burnout. A quantitative hierarchical regression was used in this study. The results reveal that administrative support, autonomy, and mental health were significant predictors of burnout, while learning management system use was a predictor of burnout, and these were the factors that were related to intent to leave. In terms of evaluation, the study is theoretical basis, timely, and methodologically sound. The study is important as it draws on administrative support and autonomy as buffers to burnout and directly informs proposed research on what organizational changes in urban schools might do to promote retention.

    Schmit, C. K., Lehmann, E., Swank, D., Alborn-Yilek, S., & Dannenbring, T. (2023). Teacher Retention: Retaining Teachers in High-Needs, Urban Secondary Schools in a Midwest State Post-Pandemic.
    _Deleted Journal_,
    _9_(1). https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1139

    This study explored the factors that influence retention following the pandemic in high-needs urban secondary schools. The study employed a correlational method with two types of data: qualitative and quantitative. The study found that certain factors predicted teacher satisfaction and intention to stay. In terms of the framework, none of the specified frameworks were given as an explicit name; however, it was aligned with organizational satisfaction theories. The participants utilized in the study were 385 teachers in secondary schools in high-poverty urban schools in a Midwest state. The researchers used Likert survey on satisfaction, leadership perception and retention intention. Quantitative descriptive statistics and frequency analysis (SPSS). The findings reveals 61% of the participants with intention to stay; 59% were satisfied with current school; positive perceptions about principal, peer, school culture, and administration support were related to intent to stay. The study employs simple exploratory methodology, with no theoretical framework or multiple states' data for generalizability but the timing is important as it follows the pandemic. The study is critical since it can be directly used to the recommended research. The study documents particular conditions in high needs urban learning institutions supporting or undermining the decision for the retention of the educators after COVID-19 pandemic.

    Scott, L. A., Bell, N., Dayton, M., Bowman, R. W., Evans, I., Grillo, M., Spence, C., & Layden, S. J. (2022). Special education teachers of color retention decisions: Findings from a national study.
    _Exceptional Children_,
    _89_(3), 001440292211098. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221109850

    This study explored the retention outcomes for special education teachers of color. Objectives: Determine the factors for national data that predict retention. Theories used include the critical race theory (CRT) and social capital theory. The participants include the nationally representative sample of special education teachers of color from SASS and Special Education Teacher Workforce. The instruments used were secondary analysis of national survey data on admin support, collegial climate, workload and fulfillment. Quantitative logistic regression is one of the methods adopted. The findings reveal that administrative support, collegial relationships, and professional development were most significant in predicting positive retention, while isolation, leadership that was not culturally responsive, and inequitable workloads predicted negative retention. In terms of assessment, the study reveals good inter-disciplinary analysis of an under-researched population; national data provides rigor, but is less nuanced in terms of qualitative analysis. In terms of rigor, the study is critical for proposed research's focus on diversity, highlighting what districts need to do to keep teachers of color in higher need schools.

    Steiner, E. D., Woo, A., & Doan, S. (2023, September 12).
    _All Work and No Pay — Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Pay and Hours Worked: Findings from the 2023 State of the American Teacher Survey_. Www.rand.org. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1108-9.html

    Teacher perceptions of pay and workload are explored in this study. Objective is to explore the relationship between these perceptions and well-being and retention intentions across the country. The overall approach to the framework is not specified explicitly, but based on the principles of organizational behavior and occupational health studies. The participants utilized in the study are a national sample of K-12 educators from the spring 2023 State of the American Teacher survey (N ≈ 1,400). Instruments used are national representative survey of instruments that took place once a year, and that included perceptions of compensation, work hours, well-being, and intent to stay. The methods include quantitative descriptive and correlational analysis, year by year (2021-2023) comparisons, and racial/ethnic comparisons. The study outcome is that teachers reported they worked unpaid 15 hours per week, with dissatisfaction with salary and workload being significantly related to poor well-being and intentions to leave, especially for Black teachers who saw leaving as being strongly related to poor salary conditions. In terms of assessment, the study is sound method, large, nationally representative sample; may not be able to show cause but is able to show important trends. The study is important as it offers timely research on compensation and workload in the context of the retention system in high poverty urban schools.

    **References**

    García, E., & Han, E. S. (2022). Teachers’ Base Salary and Districts’ Academic Performance: Evidence From National Data.
    _SAGE Open_,
    _12_(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082138

    Ha, C., Pressley, T., & Marshall, D. T. (2025). Teacher voices matter: The role of teacher autonomy in enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating burnout.
    _PLoS ONE_,
    _20_(1), e0317471–e0317471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317471

    Ingersoll, R. M., & Tran, H. (2023). Teacher shortages and turnover in rural schools in the US: An organizational analysis.
    _Educational Administration Quarterly_,
    _59_(2), 0013161X2311599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161×231159922

    Lochmiller, C. R., Perrone, F., & Finley, C. (2024). Understanding School Leadership’s Influence on Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Settings: An Exploratory Study in the U.S.
    _Education Sciences_,
    _14_(5), 545–545. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050545

    Martin, E. M., & Benedetti, C. (2025). Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Urban Schools: The Role of Empowerment, Leadership, and Collaboration.
    _Education and Urban Society_,
    _57_(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245251318318

    Nguyen, D., See, B. H., Brown, C., & Kokotsaki, D. (2024). Leadership for teacher retention: exploring the evidence base on why and how to support teacher autonomy, development, and voice.
    _Oxford Review of Education_,
    _52_(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635

    Pressley, T., Marshall, D. T., & Moore, T. (2022).
    _Understanding Teacher Burnout Following COVID-19_. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb

    Schmit, C. K., Lehmann, E., Swank, D., Alborn-Yilek, S., & Dannenbring, T. (2023). Teacher Retention: Retaining Teachers in High-Needs, Urban Secondary Schools in a Midwest State Post-Pandemic.
    _Deleted Journal_,
    _9_(1). https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1139

    Scott, L. A., Bell, N., Dayton, M., Bowman, R. W., Evans, I., Grillo, M., Spence, C., & Layden, S. J. (2022). Special education teachers of color retention decisions: Findings from a national study.
    _Exceptional Children_,
    _89_(3), 001440292211098. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221109850

    Steiner, E. D., Woo, A., & Doan, S. (2023, September 12).
    _All Work and No Pay — Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Pay and Hours Worked: Findings from the 2023 State of the American Teacher Survey_. Www.rand.org. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1108-9.html

    **Screenshot_20260721_115909_Canvas.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20260721-115909-canvas-jpg-10578113)

    **Screenshot_20260721_132421_Gallery.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20260721-132421-gallery-jpg)

    **## TheoreticalFramework.docx**

    2

    **Theoretical Framework**

    The problem of teacher retention in the United States is grounded in the Self-Determination Theory. This theory was originally developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan in 1985. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) may help explain the high teacher turnover problem, as well as the difficulty of retaining qualified teachers in schools, especially in the high-needs urban and underserved areas. The researchers introduced this theory to help explain behavior and well-being across multiple domains, for example, education and health care. According to Ryan and Deci (2020), Self-Determination Theory posits that the satisfaction of innate, universal, psychological needs influences motivation and well-being. These psychological needs are autonomy (individuals’ wish to be the source of their own behaviors and decisions), competence (the wish to be successful in their own behaviors), and relatedness (the wish to be and to feel that one belongs to a network of others).

    SDT has important ideas which help explain the retention of teachers. Teachers are more likely to be satisfied and to stay in the teaching profession when they feel they have autonomy in teaching and classroom decisions, and when they have a sense of competence as a result of the participation of helpful students and as a result of positive relationships with colleagues, administration, and students (Ryan & Deci, 2020). However, when these psychological needs are thwarted, such as when there is a lack of administrative support, there is a lot of bureaucracy, there are inadequate resources, and employees work in an isolated space, then teachers are more likely to experience emotional exhaustion and an increase in attrition rate (Wang et al., 2024). Tarantul and Berkovich (2025) and de Jong-Kroon et al. (2025) show that in order for the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness to increase the retention of teachers, and to provide stability to a workforce that is both functional and effective, a positive school culture is warranted.

    **References**

    de Jong-Kroon, N., Robbers, S., Vrieling-Teunter, E., & Vermeulen, M. (2025). Predicting teacher attrition in secondary education: A comparison of models that explain teacher behaviour.
    _International Journal of Educational Research Open_,
    _9_, 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100471

    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a self-determination Theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and Future Directions.
    _Contemporary Educational Psychology_,
    _61_(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

    Tarantul, A., & Berkovich, I. (2025). Self-determination theory and teachers’ motivations to perform emotional labor and emotion work: qualitative study of narratives about coping with students’ discipline problems.
    _Social Psychology of Education_,
    _28_(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09997-x

    Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, K., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Understanding teacher emotional exhaustion: exploring the role of teaching motivation, perceived autonomy, and teacher–student relationships.
    _Frontiers in Psychology_,
    _14_(14). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1342598

    **## AnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    11

    **Annotated Bibliography**

    Name

    Institution

    Course

    Instructor

    Date

    García, E., & Han, E. S. (2022). Teachers’ Base Salary and Districts’ Academic Performance: Evidence From National Data.
    _SAGE Open_,
    _12_(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082138

    This research reviewed the national data related to teacher base salary and turnover. The study aimed at looking at the relationship between compensation and retention and student achievement. The theoretical framework adopted by the authors are the efficiency wage theory and education production models. Participants were national K–12 teachers and districts based on the NCES and BLS data. Data were generated from the district salary data, turnover rates, and test scores. In terms of the methods, the study adopted quantitative regression analysis. The findings from the study reveal positive link between higher wages and lower turnover and increased district performance; narrowing the pay gap leads to less turnover, particularly at high-needs schools. In terms of the limitations, the study involved cross-sectional design. The strengths of the study is based on the idea that it is methodologically good with large representative data. The relevance of the study is that it promotes compensation reform as a retention tool for underserved schools.

    Ha, C., Pressley, T., & Marshall, D. T. (2025). Teacher voices matter: The role of teacher autonomy in enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating burnout.
    _PLoS ONE_,
    _20_(1), e0317471–e0317471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317471

    This research examined teacher burn out and teacher autonomy after COVID. Research aimed at investigating the moderating effects of autonomy between administrative support, job satisfaction and burnout. The author adopted self-determination theory (autonomy, competence, relatedness). The participants included in the study were 824 U.S. K–12 teachers (2021–2022). The measures adopted included online survey (validated scales). The study involved quantitative moderated mediation analysis. The outcome of the study reveal an increased autonomy correlated with increased satisfaction and decreased burnout; administrative support predicted satisfaction; 44% intended to leave in two years or less. In terms of the evaluation, the study involve a sophisticated design and limits causality in cross sections, but the strength of the national sample is good for validity. In terms of the relevance, the study connects administrative support/autonomy to being a retention lever in urban schools.

    Ingersoll, R. M., & Tran, H. (2023). Teacher shortages and turnover in rural schools in the US: An organizational analysis.
    _Educational Administration Quarterly_,
    _59_(2), 0013161X2311599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161×231159922

    This research examined the issue of teacher shortage from an organizational perspective. The method of the study involve a regression analysis that was conducted and included a log of the number of teachers and a log of the number of students teaching each teacher to determine whether working conditions or teacher supply predicted turnover. Organizational theory of schooling is used as the theoretical framework. The participants included representative sample of the nation (SASS/TFS surveys). The authors utilized secondary analysis of teacher working conditions, intentions to turn over, and principal support. The methods used were quantitative descriptive and multivariate regression. Based on the results, the organizational factors (poor admin support, limited resources, lack of influence) were more predictive of turnover than individual factors; the rate of turnover in rural schools was 50% higher than in other schools. In terms of assessment, the intensive and nationally representative; wide-ranging assessment may not focus on rural subtypes. In terms of relevance, the organizational framework is very relevant in high poverty urban areas, as leadership and conditions are a key factor in retention.

    Lochmiller, C. R., Perrone, F., & Finley, C. (2024). Understanding School Leadership’s Influence on Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Settings: An Exploratory Study in the U.S.
    _Education Sciences_,
    _14_(5), 545–545. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050545

    This study explored the types of principal behaviors that keep teachers in high-poverty schools. The focus was to develop a qualitative understanding of particular leadership actions. This book looks into the approaches of strengthening key retention factors at the school level that include administrative support, collegial relationships, and mission alignment based on the framework developed by Simon and Johnson. The participants include teachers and administrators from one high poverty elementary school with high retention (2022-2023). The authors applied semi structured interviews and document analysis. The method used was a qualitative case study, in which deductive thematic coding was applied. The study findings reveal that principals who stayed on were reaffirming mission and acknowledging teachers, creating trust, supporting families, and managing discipline well. In terms of evaluation, the deep contextual knowledge; one site does not generalize, but does provide guidance as to action. In terms of the relevance, the study recognizes explicit leadership behaviors in the field that would help keep teachers in high-poverty schools, which would directly impact proposed research on leadership.

    Martin, E. M., & Benedetti, C. (2025). Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Urban Schools: The Role of Empowerment, Leadership, and Collaboration.
    _Education and Urban Society_,
    _57_(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245251318318

    This study focuses on school-level mechanisms of retention in high poverty urban schools. Theories used in the study include teacher empowerment theory and distributed leadership theory. The participants were teachers in the highest poverty schools in the large northeastern U.S. district. The measures included survey measures of empowerment, perceptions of leadership, collaboration, and intention to stay. The methods include quantitative structural equation modeling (SEM). The outcome of the study reveal that empowerment and collaboration are significant predictors of retention intentions while instructional leadership had indirect effects via empowerment, and trusted teachers were more likely to remain. The assessment of the article shows that a combination of rigorous SEM methods; limits generalizability of single district sample, but increases direct relevance. The relevance of the study is that it identifies organizational factors associated with teacher retention in urban, high poverty schools that both reinforce empowerment and foster a collaborative culture.

    Nguyen, D., See, B. H., Brown, C., & Kokotsaki, D. (2024). Leadership for teacher retention: exploring the evidence base on why and how to support teacher autonomy, development, and voice.
    _Oxford Review of Education_,
    _52_(1), 1–21.
    [https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635](https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635)

    The purpose of this systematic review was to integrate the evidence of leadership behaviors that keep teachers. The focus is to explore the support of school leadership for retention through autonomy, development and teacher voice. Theories used are self-determination theory and distributed leadership theory. The study involve empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journal articles in public schools from January 2000 to May 2023. Systematic review with defined inclusion/exclusion criteria in various databases, five-step iterative process were used. Methods employed included qualitative synthesis of empirical studies, which is defined as screening and extraction of the data. In terms of evaluation, the study extensive, clearly explained, substantial evidence, may obscure variation around context. The study is important as it offers strong synthesis to connect proposed research to the field, the theoretical framing of principal behavior and teacher career choices in urban, high-poverty schools.

    Pressley, T., Marshall, D. T., & Moore, T. (2022).
    _Understanding Teacher Burnout Following COVID-19_.
    [https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb](https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb)

    This study determine the predictors of teacher burnout after the pandemic. The study aimed at using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model to explain burnout at the end of 2021–2022. The framework used is the JD-R model (to illustrate the imbalance between demands and resources). The participants include 779 K–12 teachers from the United States. The instruments used for data collection included online survey of job demands (workload, COVID-19 demands), job resources (admin support, autonomy) and burnout. A quantitative hierarchical regression was used in this study. The results reveal that administrative support, autonomy, and mental health were significant predictors of burnout, while learning management system use was a predictor of burnout, and these were the factors that were related to intent to leave. In terms of evaluation, the study is theoretical basis, timely, and methodologically sound. The study is important as it draws on administrative support and autonomy as buffers to burnout and directly informs proposed research on what organizational changes in urban schools might do to promote retention.

    Schmit, C. K., Lehmann, E., Swank, D., Alborn-Yilek, S., & Dannenbring, T. (2023). Teacher Retention: Retaining Teachers in High-Needs, Urban Secondary Schools in a Midwest State Post-Pandemic.
    _Deleted Journal_,
    _9_(1). https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1139

    This study explored the factors that influence retention following the pandemic in high-needs urban secondary schools. The study employed a correlational method with two types of data: qualitative and quantitative. The study found that certain factors predicted teacher satisfaction and intention to stay. In terms of the framework, none of the specified frameworks were given as an explicit name; however, it was aligned with organizational satisfaction theories. The participants utilized in the study were 385 teachers in secondary schools in high-poverty urban schools in a Midwest state. The researchers used Likert survey on satisfaction, leadership perception and retention intention. Quantitative descriptive statistics and frequency analysis (SPSS). The findings reveals 61% of the participants with intention to stay; 59% were satisfied with current school; positive perceptions about principal, peer, school culture, and administration support were related to intent to stay. The study employs simple exploratory methodology, with no theoretical framework or multiple states' data for generalizability but the timing is important as it follows the pandemic. The study is critical since it can be directly used to the recommended research. The study documents particular conditions in high needs urban learning institutions supporting or undermining the decision for the retention of the educators after COVID-19 pandemic.

    Scott, L. A., Bell, N., Dayton, M., Bowman, R. W., Evans, I., Grillo, M., Spence, C., & Layden, S. J. (2022). Special education teachers of color retention decisions: Findings from a national study.
    _Exceptional Children_,
    _89_(3), 001440292211098. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221109850

    This study explored the retention outcomes for special education teachers of color. Objectives: Determine the factors for national data that predict retention. Theories used include the critical race theory (CRT) and social capital theory. The participants include the nationally representative sample of special education teachers of color from SASS and Special Education Teacher Workforce. The instruments used were secondary analysis of national survey data on admin support, collegial climate, workload and fulfillment. Quantitative logistic regression is one of the methods adopted. The findings reveal that administrative support, collegial relationships, and professional development were most significant in predicting positive retention, while isolation, leadership that was not culturally responsive, and inequitable workloads predicted negative retention. In terms of assessment, the study reveals good inter-disciplinary analysis of an under-researched population; national data provides rigor, but is less nuanced in terms of qualitative analysis. In terms of rigor, the study is critical for proposed research's focus on diversity, highlighting what districts need to do to keep teachers of color in higher need schools.

    Steiner, E. D., Woo, A., & Doan, S. (2023, September 12).
    _All Work and No Pay — Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Pay and Hours Worked: Findings from the 2023 State of the American Teacher Survey_. Www.rand.org. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1108-9.html

    Teacher perceptions of pay and workload are explored in this study. Objective is to explore the relationship between these perceptions and well-being and retention intentions across the country. The overall approach to the framework is not specified explicitly, but based on the principles of organizational behavior and occupational health studies. The participants utilized in the study are a national sample of K-12 educators from the spring 2023 State of the American Teacher survey (N ≈ 1,400). Instruments used are national representative survey of instruments that took place once a year, and that included perceptions of compensation, work hours, well-being, and intent to stay. The methods include quantitative descriptive and correlational analysis, year by year (2021-2023) comparisons, and racial/ethnic comparisons. The study outcome is that teachers reported they worked unpaid 15 hours per week, with dissatisfaction with salary and workload being significantly related to poor well-being and intentions to leave, especially for Black teachers who saw leaving as being strongly related to poor salary conditions. In terms of assessment, the study is sound method, large, nationally representative sample; may not be able to show cause but is able to show important trends. The study is important as it offers timely research on compensation and workload in the context of the retention system in high poverty urban schools.

    **References**

    García, E., & Han, E. S. (2022). Teachers’ Base Salary and Districts’ Academic Performance: Evidence From National Data.
    _SAGE Open_,
    _12_(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082138

    Ha, C., Pressley, T., & Marshall, D. T. (2025). Teacher voices matter: The role of teacher autonomy in enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating burnout.
    _PLoS ONE_,
    _20_(1), e0317471–e0317471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317471

    Ingersoll, R. M., & Tran, H. (2023). Teacher shortages and turnover in rural schools in the US: An organizational analysis.
    _Educational Administration Quarterly_,
    _59_(2), 0013161X2311599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161×231159922

    Lochmiller, C. R., Perrone, F., & Finley, C. (2024). Understanding School Leadership’s Influence on Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Settings: An Exploratory Study in the U.S.
    _Education Sciences_,
    _14_(5), 545–545. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050545

    Martin, E. M., & Benedetti, C. (2025). Teacher Retention in High-Poverty Urban Schools: The Role of Empowerment, Leadership, and Collaboration.
    _Education and Urban Society_,
    _57_(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245251318318

    Nguyen, D., See, B. H., Brown, C., & Kokotsaki, D. (2024). Leadership for teacher retention: exploring the evidence base on why and how to support teacher autonomy, development, and voice.
    _Oxford Review of Education_,
    _52_(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2432635

    Pressley, T., Marshall, D. T., & Moore, T. (2022).
    _Understanding Teacher Burnout Following COVID-19_. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6adtb

    Schmit, C. K., Lehmann, E., Swank, D., Alborn-Yilek, S., & Dannenbring, T. (2023). Teacher Retention: Retaining Teachers in High-Needs, Urban Secondary Schools in a Midwest State Post-Pandemic.
    _Deleted Journal_,
    _9_(1). https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1139

    Scott, L. A., Bell, N., Dayton, M., Bowman, R. W., Evans, I., Grillo, M., Spence, C., & Layden, S. J. (2022). Special education teachers of color retention decisions: Findings from a national study.
    _Exceptional Children_,
    _89_(3), 001440292211098. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221109850

    Steiner, E. D., Woo, A., & Doan, S. (2023, September 12).
    _All Work and No Pay — Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Pay and Hours Worked: Findings from the 2023 State of the American Teacher Survey_. Www.rand.org. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1108-9.html

    **Screenshot_20260721_115909_Canvas.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20260721-115909-canvas-jpg-10578113)

    **Screenshot_20260721_132421_Gallery.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot-20260721-132421-gallery-jpg)

  • [Solved] Education Unit 5 Reading Assignments/ Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – **Reading Assignments** – Chapter 5 (Bambrick-Santoyo text) – Chapter 3 – the five examples (Schmoker text) – Read the sections on “Student and Family Background,” “Other Stakeholders,” and “School Conditions” (pages 46-58) in _Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning_ by Lei…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – **Reading Assignments**
    – Chapter 5 (Bambrick-Santoyo text)
    – Chapter 3 – the five examples (Schmoker text)
    – Read the sections on “Student and Family Background,” “Other Stakeholders,” and “School Conditions” (pages 46-58) in _Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning_ by Leithwood, Louis, Anderson, and Wahlstrom. [Click here to download.](https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/50607/files/4380627/download?wrap=1 "Unit One How-Leadership-Influences-Student-Learning.pdf")
    – 1 Corinthians 3:11; Proverbs 1:1-7

    – **-Unit 5: Discussion Question**
    – Discussion Question _(10 points)_
    – After reading the assigned sections in _Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning,_ select ONE condition from EACH of the following categories: school structure, school culture, instructional policies/practices, and human resources.  Discuss how each school condition has a strong impact on student learning.
    – Select one idea from the examples read about in Chapter 3 of the Mike Schmoker book, _Leading with Focus,_ that you deem would make the most impact on your current school setting. Discuss why this idea would be utilized to enhance student learning and HOW an administrator would go about adjusting school practice to improve student performance.

  • [Solved] Education Unit 5 Assignment 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **5: Professional Development Training– Delivery:** Submit by Saturday 11:59 p.m. _(100 points)_ – Use the workshop you reviewed during Unit 4. Do the following: – Create and deliver a training (modified from the one on the CD) to a small group of teachers on the material in the workshop plan you re…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **5: Professional Development Training– Delivery:** Submit by Saturday 11:59 p.m. _(100 points)_

    – Use the workshop you reviewed during Unit 4. Do the following:
    – Create and deliver a training (modified from the one on the CD) to a small group of teachers on the material in the workshop plan you reviewed that fits a professional development need of the group. Communicate to teachers how they will be held accountable for the information learned. _Be sure to gain support of the principal before doing this._
    – Gather and summarize teacher feedback about the workshop content and effectiveness, including their thoughts about being held accountable.
    – Discuss your impressions of the impact of the workshop with the principal, including teacher opinions about the effectiveness of the training. Summarize what was discussed in this meeting.
    – Write your own reflection about the effectiveness of the materials used, the feedback from the teachers, the impact of the accountability issue on the teacher participants, and the principal’s take on the process.

    – [\
    \
    IMG_5031.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5031-png-10577887 "IMG_5031.png")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_5033.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5033-png-10577889 "IMG_5033.png")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_5032.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5032-png-10577891 "IMG_5032.png")

  • [Solved] Education edu 542 week 3 assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    refer to the attached document. **files (1)** – ## edu542week3assignmentdraft.docx **## edu542week3assignmentdraft.docx** **Overview** The landscape of education and training has been evolving and changing rapidly over the past decade. New tools and ways to incorporate activities that mirror real-wo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    refer to the attached document.

    **files (1)**

    – ## edu542week3assignmentdraft.docx

    **## edu542week3assignmentdraft.docx**

    **Overview**

    The landscape of education and training has been evolving and changing rapidly over the past decade. New tools and ways to incorporate activities that mirror real-world problem-solving and experiences can engage and encourage learners to think beyond their textbooks. In this proposal, you will present your rationale and action plan for implementing two forms of emerging technology.

    You will use the proposal you created for this project for the rest of the assignments in the course.

    **Scenario**

    Your supervisor has tasked you with providing a research-based proposal for how to effectively integrate technologies into the educational needs of your organization (PK-12, higher education, corporate training, military training, or government). You must look beyond using MS Office or Google Docs to complete assignments/deliverables.

    You will select at least two emerging technologies and propose their integration. These technologies must support your learning goals and create an engaging environment for your learners. Your supervisor requires at least one multimedia tool that isn't PowerPoint or Google Slides and one collaboration tool.

    In selecting your technologies, provide research that supports how these tools provide a meaningful learning experience and are accessible to learners with diverse learning needs.

    Here are some suggestions to help you begin. You can choose from this list and/or use the Internet

    · Slido – Engage your participants with live polls, Q&A, quizzes, and word clouds whether you meet in the office, online, or in between.

    · Padlet – Make beautiful boards to collect, organize, and present anything.

    · Vyond – Offers a free trial to create animations/videos.

    · Miro – Miro is your team's visual platform to connect, collaborate, and create—together.

    · SoftChalk – provides a cloud-based solution for collaboration and lesson planning, as well as a way to link content from multiple courses in a single location.

    · Twiddla – Online Whiteboard for the Modern Classroom.

    · Evernote – helps organize different kinds of media. With everything in one place, this tool is especially useful for sharing ideas for team teaching and collaboration across districts or locations.

    **Instructions**

    In this assignment, you will be providing your employer with an overview of the types of technology you will be including in your final proposal. This will serve as an initial recommendation to your employer and will help guide you as you work toward the creation of a formal proposal for your organization.

    For this assignment, you will submit a 3 page technology review in which you:

    · Explain the purpose and rationale for your choice of proposed technologies in an introductory paragraph.

    · Explain at least three reasons why these particular tools are considered an emerging technology for your chosen educational or training setting, using the current literature to support your rationale.

    · Outline 4-5 potential benefits of using these technologies in the classroom or workplace setting.

    · Discuss 4-5 instructional goals and how incorporating these technologies supports these goals.

    · Summarize the main points of the proposal in a conclusion paragraph.

    · Provide at least five peer-reviewed references published in the last three years.

    The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

    Justify the incorporation of technology to meet instructional goals and learning outcomes.

    **## edu542week3assignmentdraft.docx**

    **Overview**

    The landscape of education and training has been evolving and changing rapidly over the past decade. New tools and ways to incorporate activities that mirror real-world problem-solving and experiences can engage and encourage learners to think beyond their textbooks. In this proposal, you will present your rationale and action plan for implementing two forms of emerging technology.

    You will use the proposal you created for this project for the rest of the assignments in the course.

    **Scenario**

    Your supervisor has tasked you with providing a research-based proposal for how to effectively integrate technologies into the educational needs of your organization (PK-12, higher education, corporate training, military training, or government). You must look beyond using MS Office or Google Docs to complete assignments/deliverables.

    You will select at least two emerging technologies and propose their integration. These technologies must support your learning goals and create an engaging environment for your learners. Your supervisor requires at least one multimedia tool that isn't PowerPoint or Google Slides and one collaboration tool.

    In selecting your technologies, provide research that supports how these tools provide a meaningful learning experience and are accessible to learners with diverse learning needs.

    Here are some suggestions to help you begin. You can choose from this list and/or use the Internet

    · Slido – Engage your participants with live polls, Q&A, quizzes, and word clouds whether you meet in the office, online, or in between.

    · Padlet – Make beautiful boards to collect, organize, and present anything.

    · Vyond – Offers a free trial to create animations/videos.

    · Miro – Miro is your team's visual platform to connect, collaborate, and create—together.

    · SoftChalk – provides a cloud-based solution for collaboration and lesson planning, as well as a way to link content from multiple courses in a single location.

    · Twiddla – Online Whiteboard for the Modern Classroom.

    · Evernote – helps organize different kinds of media. With everything in one place, this tool is especially useful for sharing ideas for team teaching and collaboration across districts or locations.

    **Instructions**

    In this assignment, you will be providing your employer with an overview of the types of technology you will be including in your final proposal. This will serve as an initial recommendation to your employer and will help guide you as you work toward the creation of a formal proposal for your organization.

    For this assignment, you will submit a 3 page technology review in which you:

    · Explain the purpose and rationale for your choice of proposed technologies in an introductory paragraph.

    · Explain at least three reasons why these particular tools are considered an emerging technology for your chosen educational or training setting, using the current literature to support your rationale.

    · Outline 4-5 potential benefits of using these technologies in the classroom or workplace setting.

    · Discuss 4-5 instructional goals and how incorporating these technologies supports these goals.

    · Summarize the main points of the proposal in a conclusion paragraph.

    · Provide at least five peer-reviewed references published in the last three years.

    The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

    Justify the incorporation of technology to meet instructional goals and learning outcomes.

  • [Solved] 570-Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning in Science and Health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Unit plans and lesson plans go hand in hand. A unit plan is the overall big picture that must be accomplished, while the lesson plans are the smaller pieces of the puzzle that come together to meet the standards of the unit. As a teacher, you will be expected to take a unit plan and break it into se…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Unit plans and lesson plans go hand in hand. A unit plan is the overall big picture that must be accomplished, while the lesson plans are the smaller pieces of the puzzle that come together to meet the standards of the unit. As a teacher, you will be expected to take a unit plan and break it into several lessons that are well aligned to the unit and meet the individual pieces of the overall learning outcomes.

    **Part 1: Lesson Plan**

    Review the unit plan that you created. Choose one day from the “ELM-570 Science Unit Plan” to design a cohesive lesson plan for that day. Use the "COE Lesson Plan Template” to create the lesson and include the following in your lesson plan:

    – At least one standards-based science and one health learning objective
    – Technological tools that promote digital literacy, engage students in inquiry-based learning, and support diverse learning needs
    – At least one engagement learning experience that is cross-disciplinary and allows students opportunities for real-world application of science

    _**Note:**_ _Ensure any instructor feedback about your unit plan is adequately reflected in the full lesson plan._

    **Part 2: Reflection**

    Write a 350word reflection on the design of your lesson plan. Include the following in your reflection:

    – Describe how the lesson plan supports the three-dimensional learning model, including a discussion of the scientific and engineering practices, the crosscutting concepts, and the disciplinary core ideas.
    – Explain how the technological tools used in the lesson promote digital literacy and engage students in inquiry.
    – Discuss how the instructional strategies used in the lesson engage students and support diverse learning needs through the incorporation of learning theories, evidence-based best practices, and technology.

    Support your assignment with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

    – [\
    \
    coe-lesson-plan-template2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/coe-lesson-plan-template2-docx-10578537 "coe-lesson-plan-template2.docx")
    – [\
    \
    ELM-570-ScienceUnitPlanTemplate11.edited.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/elm-570-scienceunitplantemplate11-edited-docx-10578539 "ELM-570-ScienceUnitPlanTemplate11.edited.docx")

  • [Solved] question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## 635Module8HW.docx **## 635Module8HW.docx** **Discussion Board Questions:** 1. What techniques can be used to create a flexible learning environment for young children with disabilities, and how do scheduling, structure, and organization contribute to optimal learning in these set…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## 635Module8HW.docx

    **## 635Module8HW.docx**

    **Discussion Board Questions:**

    1. What techniques can be used to create a flexible learning environment for young children with disabilities, and how do scheduling, structure, and organization contribute to optimal learning in these settings?

    2. Social Stories are extremely helpful when teaching students with specific disabilities. Share a Social Story you read about or developed and tell why and how it can be successfully used in instructing young children with disabilities.

    **## 635Module8HW.docx**

    **Discussion Board Questions:**

    1. What techniques can be used to create a flexible learning environment for young children with disabilities, and how do scheduling, structure, and organization contribute to optimal learning in these settings?

    2. Social Stories are extremely helpful when teaching students with specific disabilities. Share a Social Story you read about or developed and tell why and how it can be successfully used in instructing young children with disabilities.