My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## TransculturalFoodFunctions.docx **## TransculturalFoodFunctions.docx** Transcultural Food Functions, Beliefs, and Practices Instructions: After reviewing the Transcultural Food Functions, Beliefs, and Practices in this module, choose two different Traditional religious beliefs and dietary pract…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## TransculturalFoodFunctions.docx

    **## TransculturalFoodFunctions.docx**

    Transcultural Food Functions, Beliefs, and Practices

    Instructions:

    After reviewing the Transcultural Food Functions, Beliefs, and Practices in this module, choose two different Traditional religious beliefs and dietary practices and prepare a recorded PowerPoint presentation. This presentation must include the relation of food functions, beliefs, and practices with the practice of the religion you selected. An include the importance of considering this by a DNP in clinical practice

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Power point presentations with 10- slides were clear and easy to read.

    · Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism.

    **## TransculturalFoodFunctions.docx**

    Transcultural Food Functions, Beliefs, and Practices

    Instructions:

    After reviewing the Transcultural Food Functions, Beliefs, and Practices in this module, choose two different Traditional religious beliefs and dietary practices and prepare a recorded PowerPoint presentation. This presentation must include the relation of food functions, beliefs, and practices with the practice of the religion you selected. An include the importance of considering this by a DNP in clinical practice

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Power point presentations with 10- slides were clear and easy to read.

    · Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism.

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## SelectingaTopicandDesigningaClinicalQuestionusingPICOTTaxonomy.docx **## SelectingaTopicandDesigningaClinicalQuestionusingPICOTTaxonomy.docx** **Module 3:** _Selecting a Topic and Designing a Clinical Question using PICOT Taxonomy_ **Instructions:** Create an essay of a minimum of five pages ex…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## SelectingaTopicandDesigningaClinicalQuestionusingPICOTTaxonomy.docx

    **## SelectingaTopicandDesigningaClinicalQuestionusingPICOTTaxonomy.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Selecting a Topic and Designing a Clinical Question using PICOT Taxonomy_

    **Instructions:**

    Create an essay of a minimum of five pages explaining the PICOT format and what is the importance of following the PICOT format when formulating the clinical question?

    1. What is the PICOT Format?

    2. What is the importance of following the PICOT format when formulating the clinical question?

    3. Provide two examples of clinical questions formulated utilizing the PICOT format.

    **Use an Essay Format:**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, including citations and references, use APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **Official Essay Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Essay Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery of the Information | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**24 to >21.0 ptsFair** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**21 to >18.0 ptsPoor** The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization<br>Structure of the Essay | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking<br>Development of Ideas | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics and Grammar | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsFair** The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**6 to >5.0 ptsPoor** The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## SelectingaTopicandDesigningaClinicalQuestionusingPICOTTaxonomy.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Selecting a Topic and Designing a Clinical Question using PICOT Taxonomy_

    **Instructions:**

    Create an essay of a minimum of five pages explaining the PICOT format and what is the importance of following the PICOT format when formulating the clinical question?

    1. What is the PICOT Format?

    2. What is the importance of following the PICOT format when formulating the clinical question?

    3. Provide two examples of clinical questions formulated utilizing the PICOT format.

    **Use an Essay Format:**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, including citations and references, use APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **Official Essay Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Essay Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery of the Information | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**24 to >21.0 ptsFair** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**21 to >18.0 ptsPoor** The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization<br>Structure of the Essay | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking<br>Development of Ideas | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics and Grammar | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsFair** The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**6 to >5.0 ptsPoor** The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## CaseStudyonEthicalPrinciples.docx **## CaseStudyonEthicalPrinciples.docx** _Case Study on Ethical Principles_ Instructions: Using the following link: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979). _The Belmont report._ Office for Human Research Protections. [https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/reg…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## CaseStudyonEthicalPrinciples.docx

    **## CaseStudyonEthicalPrinciples.docx**

    _Case Study on Ethical Principles_

    Instructions:

    Using the following link:

    U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979).
    _The Belmont report._ Office for Human Research Protections.
    [https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.htmlLinks to an external site.](https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html)

    Read the Belmont’s Report: Using the topic selected for your practice change project, create a case study that describes how the ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice will be protected during your project.

    Contribute a minimum of 5-6 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism.

    **Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | **40 to >36.0 ptsExcellent** The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**36 to >32.0 ptsGood** The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**32 to >28.0 ptsFair** The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**28 to >24.0 ptsPoor** The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | **25 to >23.0 ptsExcellent** The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsGood** The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**20 to >18.0 ptsFair** The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsPoor** The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.<br> <br>**15 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## CaseStudyonEthicalPrinciples.docx**

    _Case Study on Ethical Principles_

    Instructions:

    Using the following link:

    U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979).
    _The Belmont report._ Office for Human Research Protections.
    [https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.htmlLinks to an external site.](https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html)

    Read the Belmont’s Report: Using the topic selected for your practice change project, create a case study that describes how the ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice will be protected during your project.

    Contribute a minimum of 5-6 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism.

    **Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | **40 to >36.0 ptsExcellent** The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**36 to >32.0 ptsGood** The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**32 to >28.0 ptsFair** The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**28 to >24.0 ptsPoor** The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | **25 to >23.0 ptsExcellent** The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsGood** The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**20 to >18.0 ptsFair** The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsPoor** The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.<br> <br>**15 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Leadsty

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    To assess own leadership skills. **Content Requirements:** 1. Determine your preferred leadership style using The Foundation of Nursing Leadership's [Leadership Development – Test One – What is your leadership style?Links to an external site.](http://www.nursingleadership.org.uk/test1.php) 2. Analyz…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    To assess own leadership skills.
    **Content Requirements:**
    1. Determine your preferred leadership style using The Foundation of Nursing Leadership's [Leadership Development – Test One – What is your leadership style?Links to an external site.](http://www.nursingleadership.org.uk/test1.php)
    2. Analyze your leadership’s skills based on your self-assessment.
    3. Identify strengths and opportunities for improvement based on your self-assessment.
    4. Create an action plan to address self-assessment capitalizing on strengths and addressing opportunities for improvement.

  • [Solved] Question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## AfricanArt2ndAssn.pdf **## AfricanArt2ndAssn.pdf** Write a 2-page paper based on these questions Step One: Describe what you see in the mask above, only what you see. Articulate details, colors, textures, forms, composition, materials, how it takes up time and space and the relationships all ar…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## AfricanArt2ndAssn.pdf

    **## AfricanArt2ndAssn.pdf**

    Write a 2-page paper based on these questions

    Step One:

    Describe what you see in the mask above, only what you see. Articulate details, colors,
    textures, forms, composition, materials, how it takes up time and space and the
    relationships all around it. Describe its craft – is it well-made? Describe its properties and
    characteristics as an object, the details of each image and the characteristics of the image.

    Step Two

    Describe what the work or object feels like and how it makes you feel.

    Step Three

    Analyze possible meanings of the image or object and/or the intentions of the artist.

    Step Four

    Give any possible historical or contemporary art contexts for the art, process, object or
    image.

    Who and/or what has influenced this work?

    Step five

    Write down your observations and discoveries!

    Use this information for Assignment 2. Put the information in essay format and create a two
    page paper analyzing the above mask following the above steps.

    **## AfricanArt2ndAssn.pdf**

    Write a 2-page paper based on these questions

    Step One:

    Describe what you see in the mask above, only what you see. Articulate details, colors,
    textures, forms, composition, materials, how it takes up time and space and the
    relationships all around it. Describe its craft – is it well-made? Describe its properties and
    characteristics as an object, the details of each image and the characteristics of the image.

    Step Two

    Describe what the work or object feels like and how it makes you feel.

    Step Three

    Analyze possible meanings of the image or object and/or the intentions of the artist.

    Step Four

    Give any possible historical or contemporary art contexts for the art, process, object or
    image.

    Who and/or what has influenced this work?

    Step five

    Write down your observations and discoveries!

    Use this information for Assignment 2. Put the information in essay format and create a two
    page paper analyzing the above mask following the above steps.

  • [Solved] Nursing Chapter 4 – Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Scenario** – John is a 32 year old male nurse working in a prison. He is married and has two children at home- one boy at 14 years of age and a girl that just turned ten years of age. A new prisoner to the institution has requested that John be a healthcare surrogate for him because he is 72 year…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Scenario** – John is a 32 year old male nurse working in a prison. He is married and has two children at home- one boy at 14 years of age and a girl that just turned ten years of age. A new prisoner to the institution has requested that John be a healthcare surrogate for him because he is 72 years of age and not in good health. John discovers that this prisoner is a pedophile and although no one at work is aware of this, John's son was molested by the father of a friend of his sons while visiting their home. The son has gone through therapy and they continue to have problems with the son, John is hopeful that his son will improve his mental health.
    John feels divided because on one hand he feels obligated to serve as an RN professional and on the other hand he feels very hateful of the pedophile lifestyle that seems to encompass the newly admitted prisoner.
    **Instructions:**
    1. Read the scenario above, and then answer the following questions:
    1. What kinds of issues ethically is John dealing with?
    2. How would you counsel John in his dilemma?
    3. Finally, what would be a reasonable approach to this problem that John has professionally and personally?
    4. ****NOTE**: **Be sure to check the Ethics statements for the ANA and Nursing Code of Ethics for Nurses**

  • [Solved] Nursing Chapter 5 – Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **CASE INTRODUCTION** – Charlotte Greene, a registered nurse, is discharging a pediatric patient, Joey Slater, to home care under the supervision of his mother. The child returns to the hospital five weeks later with some concerning issues **Brief Summary of Case** **SCENE 1:** Joey Slater, an 8-ye…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **CASE INTRODUCTION** – Charlotte Greene, a registered nurse, is discharging a pediatric patient, Joey Slater, to home care under the supervision of his mother. The child returns to the hospital five weeks later with some concerning issues
    **Brief Summary of Case**
    **SCENE 1:** Joey Slater, an 8-year-old child who received blood transfusion for femur, is now ready for discharge. Stacey, a licensed practical nurse/licensed vocational nurse (LPN/LVN), offers to take care of discharge teaching about cast care, while Charlotte, an RN, calls home health care to arrange a home visit.
    **SCENE 2:** Five weeks later, Joey is readmitted to the pediatric floor. On assessment by the RN, maggots were coming out of the cast, and perineal skin breakdown was noted. As Charlotte and the mother discuss the situation, it’s clear that there was a lack of education. The mother also states that home health nurses never contacted her. Later, Charlotte calls the agency and discovers that they tried repeatedly to contact the family without success.
    **SCENE 3:** Charlotte tells Joey that the doctor says he can go home, but he seems worried and scared. Later, Charlotte calls social services to involve them in the patient’s care. Charlotte advocates for the patient by delaying his discharge and reporting subjective and objective findings to social services.
    **Instructions:**
    1. Read the case study above and then, answer the following questions for **Scene 1**:
    1. What primary violation of the Code of Ethics in Nursing did you witness in this scene?
    2. What evidence do you see for proper delegation, if any, by the RN in the video case?
    – What improper delegation took place?
    – What would you as the nurse have delegated in this scene?
    2. Now, answer the following questions for **Scene 2**:
    1. What evidence do we have of the potential for professional negligence and malpractice in the care delivery for this patient? **(as a legal standard)**
    2. Is there any liability on either party?
    3. Which of the nine Code of Ethics for Nursing provisions were upheld by the registered nurse in this scene?

  • [Solved] Module 1 -Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Chapter 3 has a description of various leadership types. Below are the leadership types: – Agile Leadership Theory – Authentic Leadership Theory – Emotional Quotient Leadership Theory – Human Capital Leadership Theory – Principal Agent Leadership Theory – Quantum Leadership Theory – Rebel Leadership…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Chapter 3 has a description of various leadership types. Below are the leadership types:
    – Agile Leadership Theory
    – Authentic Leadership Theory
    – Emotional Quotient Leadership Theory
    – Human Capital Leadership Theory
    – Principal Agent Leadership Theory
    – Quantum Leadership Theory
    – Rebel Leadership Theory
    – Servant Leadership Theory
    – Social Capital Leadership Theory
    – Thought Leadership Theory
    **Instructions:**
    1. Pick one (1) leadership type that you favor and explain the following:
    1. Why does that type of leadership seems attractive to you?
    2. Can you use that type of leadership in a real situation that you have encountered?
    – Describe the situation.
    3. Why the type you chose works well in that situation, and, finally
    4. Does the type of leadership fits with one trait that you possess?
    2. Your post should:
    – Answer the questions as thoroughly and concisely as possible.
    – Be sure to reference any works that you utilize in answering the questions
    – Be sure that references are in [APALinks to an external site.](https://libraryguides.mdc.edu/ld.php?content_id=52531811) format.

  • [Solved] Nursing Chapter 6- Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Read the attached article- Essentials of Advocacy in Case Management and then, answer the following questions: 1. Case Managers have four duties as described in the article. What are they? 2. What dilemma are Case Managers presented with everyday they practice? 3. What is the relationship between ad…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Read the attached article- Essentials of Advocacy in Case Management and then, answer the following questions:
    1. Case Managers have four duties as described in the article. What are they?
    2. What dilemma are Case Managers presented with everyday they practice?
    3. What is the relationship between advocacy and provider-driven ?
    4. Give four examples of case manager advocacy that are mentioned in the article.
    5. Name four Four Basic Perspectives on Advocacy in Case Management Practice.
    6. Case management advocacy consists of seven areas of focus. What are they?
    \
    Article_Advocacy_Case_Manage_I_Leader.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article-advocacy-case-manage-i-leader-pdf "Article_Advocacy_Case_Manage_I_Leader.pdf")

  • [Solved] DB help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering DB help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.