My Blog

Tag: Financial Accounting

  • [Solved] innovation report

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## innovinbusiness.docx – EcoPackInnovations.pptx **## innovinbusiness.docx** **INNOVATION IN BUSINESS 2024-25** **Report and Presentation: your Business Plan** **You will need to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## innovinbusiness.docx

    – EcoPackInnovations.pptx

    **## innovinbusiness.docx**

    **INNOVATION IN BUSINESS 2024-25**

    **Report and Presentation: your Business Plan**

    **You will need to:**

    (1)
    **Develop and submit into Turnitin the Business Plan** of
    **YOUR OWN innovation project in a corporation or developing your own start-up in a sector of your choice**, following the table of contents indicated below. You can continue with the innovation project in a corporation or start-up you developed in your midterm assignment or work on a different project.

    (2)
    **Make a group pitch presentation in-class of the Business Plan.**

    Table of Contents:

    1. Executive summary

    1. The idea, mission, vision, values of the company

    1. The business opportunity and market it pretends to serve.

    1. The competitor’s analysis

    1. The industry analysis

    1. The environmental analysis (PESTEL)

    1. Strengths and weaknesses of the start-up and resulting opportunities and threats (SWOT)

    1. 3-year future goals

    1. Action Plan: Marketing & Sales, Operations, HR, IT, Legal, Financials

    1. Implementation Schedule

    1. Viability and Conclusions

    1. References

    · Use relevant vocabulary and concepts covered in the course.

    · Use reliable sources of information.

    · Information must be contextual

    · Table of contents required

    **Formalities:**

    · Format:
    **Powerpoint presentation (suggested)**

    · Number of slides: open
    **(10-20 pages)**

    · Including Cover, Table of Contents, Images, Tables, Graphs. References and Appendix are excluded from the slide count.

    · The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

    **In-class pitch presentation**

    **Learning outcomes:** It assesses the following learning outcomes:

    · Outcome 1: categorize and assess business opportunities and their feasibility

    · Outcome 2: evaluate funding sources and their match with the business plan

    · Outcome 3: demonstrate analytical and conceptual skills

    · Outcome 4: demonstrate discussion and presentation techniques

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup , but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup . Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Pitch presentation:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(50%)** | Student proposes highly adequate strategic objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate strategic objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some strategic objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some strategic objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any strategic objectives. |
    | **Oral communication**<br>**(50%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the time limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup, but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup. Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **EcoPackInnovations.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ecopackinnovations-pptx)

    **EcoPackInnovations.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ecopackinnovations-pptx)

    **## innovinbusiness.docx**

    **INNOVATION IN BUSINESS 2024-25**

    **Report and Presentation: your Business Plan**

    **You will need to:**

    (1)
    **Develop and submit into Turnitin the Business Plan** of
    **YOUR OWN innovation project in a corporation or developing your own start-up in a sector of your choice**, following the table of contents indicated below. You can continue with the innovation project in a corporation or start-up you developed in your midterm assignment or work on a different project.

    (2)
    **Make a group pitch presentation in-class of the Business Plan.**

    Table of Contents:

    1. Executive summary

    1. The idea, mission, vision, values of the company

    1. The business opportunity and market it pretends to serve.

    1. The competitor’s analysis

    1. The industry analysis

    1. The environmental analysis (PESTEL)

    1. Strengths and weaknesses of the start-up and resulting opportunities and threats (SWOT)

    1. 3-year future goals

    1. Action Plan: Marketing & Sales, Operations, HR, IT, Legal, Financials

    1. Implementation Schedule

    1. Viability and Conclusions

    1. References

    · Use relevant vocabulary and concepts covered in the course.

    · Use reliable sources of information.

    · Information must be contextual

    · Table of contents required

    **Formalities:**

    · Format:
    **Powerpoint presentation (suggested)**

    · Number of slides: open
    **(10-20 pages)**

    · Including Cover, Table of Contents, Images, Tables, Graphs. References and Appendix are excluded from the slide count.

    · The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

    **In-class pitch presentation**

    **Learning outcomes:** It assesses the following learning outcomes:

    · Outcome 1: categorize and assess business opportunities and their feasibility

    · Outcome 2: evaluate funding sources and their match with the business plan

    · Outcome 3: demonstrate analytical and conceptual skills

    · Outcome 4: demonstrate discussion and presentation techniques

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup , but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup . Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Pitch presentation:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(50%)** | Student proposes highly adequate strategic objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate strategic objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some strategic objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some strategic objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any strategic objectives. |
    | **Oral communication**<br>**(50%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the time limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup, but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup. Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **EcoPackInnovations.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ecopackinnovations-pptx)

    **## innovinbusiness.docx**

    **INNOVATION IN BUSINESS 2024-25**

    **Report and Presentation: your Business Plan**

    **You will need to:**

    (1)
    **Develop and submit into Turnitin the Business Plan** of
    **YOUR OWN innovation project in a corporation or developing your own start-up in a sector of your choice**, following the table of contents indicated below. You can continue with the innovation project in a corporation or start-up you developed in your midterm assignment or work on a different project.

    (2)
    **Make a group pitch presentation in-class of the Business Plan.**

    Table of Contents:

    1. Executive summary

    1. The idea, mission, vision, values of the company

    1. The business opportunity and market it pretends to serve.

    1. The competitor’s analysis

    1. The industry analysis

    1. The environmental analysis (PESTEL)

    1. Strengths and weaknesses of the start-up and resulting opportunities and threats (SWOT)

    1. 3-year future goals

    1. Action Plan: Marketing & Sales, Operations, HR, IT, Legal, Financials

    1. Implementation Schedule

    1. Viability and Conclusions

    1. References

    · Use relevant vocabulary and concepts covered in the course.

    · Use reliable sources of information.

    · Information must be contextual

    · Table of contents required

    **Formalities:**

    · Format:
    **Powerpoint presentation (suggested)**

    · Number of slides: open
    **(10-20 pages)**

    · Including Cover, Table of Contents, Images, Tables, Graphs. References and Appendix are excluded from the slide count.

    · The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

    **In-class pitch presentation**

    **Learning outcomes:** It assesses the following learning outcomes:

    · Outcome 1: categorize and assess business opportunities and their feasibility

    · Outcome 2: evaluate funding sources and their match with the business plan

    · Outcome 3: demonstrate analytical and conceptual skills

    · Outcome 4: demonstrate discussion and presentation techniques

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup , but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup . Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Pitch presentation:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(50%)** | Student proposes highly adequate strategic objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate strategic objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some strategic objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some strategic objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any strategic objectives. |
    | **Oral communication**<br>**(50%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the time limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the time limit. |

    **Rubrics for the Turnitin:**

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Exceptional**<br>**90-100** | **Good**<br>**80-89** | **Fair**<br>**70-79** | **Marginal fail**<br>**60-69** | **Fail**<br>**<60** |
    | **Application**<br>**(25%)** | Student applies research methodologies and relevant class theory effectively to analyse the startup and draw relevant insights. | Student shows evidence of applying research methodologies and relevant class theory to analyse the startup and draw some insights. | Student makes an attempt at analysing their startup, but with few references to class theory. Any insights drawn may be limited. May demonstrate minor misunderstandings. | Student makes an insufficient attempt at analysing their startup. Insights drawn are very limited without using theory. <br>Demonstrates misunderstandings. | Student makes a poor analysis, drawing extremely limited / no relevant insights or links to class theory.<br>Significant misunderstandings are in evidence. |
    | **Evaluation**<br>**(25%)** | Student constructs a coherent argument to present well-justified first sections of the business plan using a range of appropriate sources from wider research. | Student constructs a mostly coherent argument to present the first sections of the business plan with some justification from mostly appropriate wider research. | Student attempts to construct a coherent argument and present the first part of the business plan, although it may lack justification or support from wider research. | Student attempts to construct an argument and present the first section of the business plan, although it lacks justification or support from wider research. | Student is unable to construct an argument to present the first sections of the business plan. Insufficient/ no justification is provided. No evidence of wider research. |
    | **Proposal**<br>**(25%)** | Student proposes highly adequate business plan objectives that follow on coherently from the evaluation and are well- justified. | Student proposes adequate business plan objectives that are connected to their evaluation and justified. | Student proposes some business plan objectives that bear some connection to their evaluation and attempts to justify them. | Student attempts to propose some business plan objectives although they bear little relation to the evaluation and are weak and unsupported. | Student fails to propose any objectives. |
    | **Written communication**<br>**(25%)** | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly under the page limit. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the page limit. | Student fails to communicate ideas clearly or concisely and is excessively over or under the page limit. |

    **EcoPackInnovations.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ecopackinnovations-pptx)

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Operations Management Assignment 1 week two

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) Wal-Mart is well know to be a leader in Supply Chain Management – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    Wal-Mart is well know to be a leader in Supply Chain Management

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Operations Management Assignment 1 case study 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) utline below to assist you with your analysis – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    utline below to assist you with your analysis

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 2500 wordss + ppt

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Coca Cola is the company files below – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## taskinfo.pdf **## taskinfo.pdf** Task 1.1: Group Assignment (Theme 2) Assessment type: Video and/or audio presentation Duration: • Group Pr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    Coca Cola is the company

    files below

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## taskinfo.pdf

    **## taskinfo.pdf**

    Task 1.1: Group Assignment (Theme 2)
    Assessment type: Video and/or audio presentation

    Duration:

    • Group Presentation: 25 minutes
    • Individual Report: 2500 words

    Group Size: 2-3 students

    Objectives

    1. Analyze and Evaluate: Critically analyze and evaluate the management practices
    and performance of a selected large corporation.

    2. Research and Data Gathering: Collect and interpret information from reliable
    sources to support your findings.

    3. Align with Sustainability Goals: Examine the corporation’s management
    strategies in light of the UN’s Global Sustainability Goals (SDGs) 2030 and propose
    strategic realignment.

    4. Collaborative Contribution: Document and communicate each group member’s
    contributions to the assessment.

    Structure of the Assessment

    1. Group Presentation (25 minutes)

    A. Presentation Components (Total: 25 minutes)

    1. Introduction
    o Brief introduction of the selected corporation.
    o Outline the objectives of the presentation.

    2. Management Practices Analysis
    o Describe the current management practices of the corporation.
    o Identify and analyze key management strategies used by the corporation.
    o Discuss any relevant performance metrics and data.

    3. Performance Evaluation
    o Assess the performance of the corporation based on qualitative and

    quantitative data.
    o Compare performance with industry standards or competitors.
    o Highlight strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT

    analysis).
    4. Sustainability Alignment

    o Discuss the relevance of the UN’s Global Sustainability Goals (SDGs) 2030
    to the corporation.

    o Identify specific PLCs (Product Life Cycles) that require strategic
    realignment.

    o Justify the necessity for changes in management practices to meet these
    goals.

    5. Conclusions and Recommendations
    o Summarize key findings.
    o Present actionable recommendations for management and sustainability

    alignment.
    6. Q&A Session

    o Open the floor for questions from the audience.

    2. Individual Report (2500 Words)

    A. Report Structure (Total: 2500 words)

    1. Title Page
    o Title of the report.
    o Names of group members.
    o Date of submission.

    2. Executive Summary (200 words)
    o A concise summary of the report’s main findings, recommendations, and

    conclusions.
    3. Introduction (300 words)

    o Background of the selected corporation.
    o Purpose and scope of the report.
    o Brief overview of the structure of the report.

    4. Analysis of Management Practices (600 words)
    o Detailed examination of current management practices.
    o Discussion of key management strategies, including leadership, decision-

    making processes, and organizational structure.
    o Use of data and evidence from reliable sources to support the analysis.

    5. Performance Evaluation (600 words)
    o In-depth evaluation of the corporation’s performance metrics (financial and

    non-financial).
    o Comparison with industry benchmarks and competitors.
    o SWOT analysis highlighting strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and

    threats.
    6. Sustainability Alignment (500 words)

    o Analysis of how the corporation aligns with the UN’s Global Sustainability
    Goals (SDGs) 2030.

    o Identification of specific PLCs needing strategic realignment.
    o Justification for changes needed to improve sustainability practices.

    7. Conclusions and Recommendations (300 words)
    o Summary of key findings from the analysis.
    o Practical recommendations for enhancing management practices and

    aligning with sustainability goals.
    8. Contributions from Group Members (100 words)

    o Brief note on the contributions of each member to the overall project.
    9. References

    o List all sources used in APA or MLA format, ensuring reliable and credible
    sources are cited.

    Learning Outcomes

    • LO1: Identify, reflect on, and evaluate their own strengths, abilities, and

    performance, and the impact of these factors in relation to their future management

    style, employability, and career.

    • LO2: Critically evaluate and re-design the internal management and performance of

    large corporations to contribute to external long-term global sustainable goals.

    Assessment Criteria

    1. Content Quality (40%)
    o Depth of analysis and evaluation of management practices and performance.
    o Relevance and integration of sustainability goals.

    2. Research and Data Use (30%)
    o Use of reliable and relevant sources to support findings.
    o Quality and appropriateness of data presented.

    3. Presentation Skills (20%)
    o Clarity, coherence, and organization of the group presentation.
    o Ability to engage the audience and respond to questions.

    4. Report Structure and Writing Quality (10%)
    o Clarity, coherence, and academic rigor of the individual report.
    o Adherence to formatting and citation guidelines.

    Submission Guidelines

    • Presentation: All groups to present/submit ppt slides on the scheduled date (s).
    • Report: Submit the individual report by the deadline, ensuring that it adheres to the

    word count and formatting guidelines.

    This assessment framework provides a comprehensive guide for students to follow,
    ensuring they cover all necessary aspects of the assignment. It encourages collaboration
    while allowing for individual expression and critical evaluation of the selected corporation’s
    practices.

    **## taskinfo.pdf**

    Task 1.1: Group Assignment (Theme 2)
    Assessment type: Video and/or audio presentation

    Duration:

    • Group Presentation: 25 minutes
    • Individual Report: 2500 words

    Group Size: 2-3 students

    Objectives

    1. Analyze and Evaluate: Critically analyze and evaluate the management practices
    and performance of a selected large corporation.

    2. Research and Data Gathering: Collect and interpret information from reliable
    sources to support your findings.

    3. Align with Sustainability Goals: Examine the corporation’s management
    strategies in light of the UN’s Global Sustainability Goals (SDGs) 2030 and propose
    strategic realignment.

    4. Collaborative Contribution: Document and communicate each group member’s
    contributions to the assessment.

    Structure of the Assessment

    1. Group Presentation (25 minutes)

    A. Presentation Components (Total: 25 minutes)

    1. Introduction
    o Brief introduction of the selected corporation.
    o Outline the objectives of the presentation.

    2. Management Practices Analysis
    o Describe the current management practices of the corporation.
    o Identify and analyze key management strategies used by the corporation.
    o Discuss any relevant performance metrics and data.

    3. Performance Evaluation
    o Assess the performance of the corporation based on qualitative and

    quantitative data.
    o Compare performance with industry standards or competitors.
    o Highlight strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT

    analysis).
    4. Sustainability Alignment

    o Discuss the relevance of the UN’s Global Sustainability Goals (SDGs) 2030
    to the corporation.

    o Identify specific PLCs (Product Life Cycles) that require strategic
    realignment.

    o Justify the necessity for changes in management practices to meet these
    goals.

    5. Conclusions and Recommendations
    o Summarize key findings.
    o Present actionable recommendations for management and sustainability

    alignment.
    6. Q&A Session

    o Open the floor for questions from the audience.

    2. Individual Report (2500 Words)

    A. Report Structure (Total: 2500 words)

    1. Title Page
    o Title of the report.
    o Names of group members.
    o Date of submission.

    2. Executive Summary (200 words)
    o A concise summary of the report’s main findings, recommendations, and

    conclusions.
    3. Introduction (300 words)

    o Background of the selected corporation.
    o Purpose and scope of the report.
    o Brief overview of the structure of the report.

    4. Analysis of Management Practices (600 words)
    o Detailed examination of current management practices.
    o Discussion of key management strategies, including leadership, decision-

    making processes, and organizational structure.
    o Use of data and evidence from reliable sources to support the analysis.

    5. Performance Evaluation (600 words)
    o In-depth evaluation of the corporation’s performance metrics (financial and

    non-financial).
    o Comparison with industry benchmarks and competitors.
    o SWOT analysis highlighting strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and

    threats.
    6. Sustainability Alignment (500 words)

    o Analysis of how the corporation aligns with the UN’s Global Sustainability
    Goals (SDGs) 2030.

    o Identification of specific PLCs needing strategic realignment.
    o Justification for changes needed to improve sustainability practices.

    7. Conclusions and Recommendations (300 words)
    o Summary of key findings from the analysis.
    o Practical recommendations for enhancing management practices and

    aligning with sustainability goals.
    8. Contributions from Group Members (100 words)

    o Brief note on the contributions of each member to the overall project.
    9. References

    o List all sources used in APA or MLA format, ensuring reliable and credible
    sources are cited.

    Learning Outcomes

    • LO1: Identify, reflect on, and evaluate their own strengths, abilities, and

    performance, and the impact of these factors in relation to their future management

    style, employability, and career.

    • LO2: Critically evaluate and re-design the internal management and performance of

    large corporations to contribute to external long-term global sustainable goals.

    Assessment Criteria

    1. Content Quality (40%)
    o Depth of analysis and evaluation of management practices and performance.
    o Relevance and integration of sustainability goals.

    2. Research and Data Use (30%)
    o Use of reliable and relevant sources to support findings.
    o Quality and appropriateness of data presented.

    3. Presentation Skills (20%)
    o Clarity, coherence, and organization of the group presentation.
    o Ability to engage the audience and respond to questions.

    4. Report Structure and Writing Quality (10%)
    o Clarity, coherence, and academic rigor of the individual report.
    o Adherence to formatting and citation guidelines.

    Submission Guidelines

    • Presentation: All groups to present/submit ppt slides on the scheduled date (s).
    • Report: Submit the individual report by the deadline, ensuring that it adheres to the

    word count and formatting guidelines.

    This assessment framework provides a comprehensive guide for students to follow,
    ensuring they cover all necessary aspects of the assignment. It encourages collaboration
    while allowing for individual expression and critical evaluation of the selected corporation’s
    practices.

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Operations Management Assignment 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) Need help will send info, book is downloaded you do have to use it and outside Source as well – 2 years ago **files (1)** – Chap4.pdf **Chap4.pdf** This file is too large to display. [Vie…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    Need help will send info, book is downloaded you do have to use it and outside Source as well

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – Chap4.pdf

    **Chap4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chap4-pdf-10156217)

    **Chap4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chap4-pdf-10156217)

  • [Solved] Module 1 – Group Discussion: Chapter 2 – Ethics Module 1 – Group Discussion: Chapter 2 – Ethics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) ## Module 1 – Group Discussion: Chapter 2 – Ethics ## Module 1 – Group Discussion: Chapter 2 – Ethics – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    ## Module 1 – Group Discussion: Chapter 2 – Ethics

    ## Module 1 – Group Discussion: Chapter 2 – Ethics

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Module 1 – Case Study Module 1 – Case Study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) ## Module 1 – Case Study ## Module 1 – Case Study – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    ## Module 1 – Case Study

    ## Module 1 – Case Study

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Discussion Q – Leadership “Attitude Reflects Leadership”

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAgZQ53rC44 1. Watch video 2. Answer Questions – What is the issue in the video? – How can leadership resolve the issue? – What leadership concepts can y…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAgZQ53rC44

    1. Watch video

    2. Answer Questions

    – What is the issue in the video?
    – How can leadership resolve the issue?
    – What leadership concepts can you apply from the textbook to the video situation?

    No AI-generated answers

    Due: 1/20

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] weekly discussion aid

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Go to the internet and find a news article(s) published _within the last month_ that discusses US level of interest rates, summarize key points of the article using finance terminology. Note that the goal of t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    Go to the internet and find a news article(s) published _within the last month_ that discusses US level of interest rates, summarize key points of the article using finance terminology.

    Note that the goal of this discussion is to read, understand, and discuss recent news using finance terminology. The article should be from an online newspaper or magazine. Materials posted on educational websites, such as www.thebalance.com, [www.khanacademy.org](https://www.khanacademy.org/), Investopedia and so on, are not considered news articles even if they were recently updated and contain material related to the discussion topic.

    Discussion questions:

    1. Summarize key points of the article using finance terminology.
    2. What are the ramifications of the interest rate levels to the economy, consumer spending, lending, et al?
    3. Reflection: the students should also include a paragraph in the initial response in their own words, using finance terminology, reflecting on what they learned from the assignment and how they think they could apply what they learned in the workplace or in everyday life.

    You are expected to contribute to the main topic and respond with value-added comments to at least two of your classmates and your instructor.

    You must start a thread before you can read and reply to other threads

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] W2F 400 Word

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) see attachment – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## W2FInstructs.docx **## W2FInstructs.docx** **What role does culture play on managers in global situations?** Reflecting on your organization or experiences in th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    see attachment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## W2FInstructs.docx

    **## W2FInstructs.docx**

    **What role does culture play on managers in global situations?**

    Reflecting on your organization or experiences in the past, identify and discuss the observed behaviors as it relates to your chosen dimension. (Oil and Gas Industry)

    What challenges did it present the leader in managing and leading the employee?

    What guidance might you provide the leader to manage more effectively?

    **This should be wrote in a prospective of me not having experience with Global situations but still talk about the struggles of global situations for managers.**

    **400 word minimum**

    **Minimum of 2 scholarly sources**

    **Plagiarism and AI free**

    **A+ work required**

    **## W2FInstructs.docx**

    **What role does culture play on managers in global situations?**

    Reflecting on your organization or experiences in the past, identify and discuss the observed behaviors as it relates to your chosen dimension. (Oil and Gas Industry)

    What challenges did it present the leader in managing and leading the employee?

    What guidance might you provide the leader to manage more effectively?

    **This should be wrote in a prospective of me not having experience with Global situations but still talk about the struggles of global situations for managers.**

    **400 word minimum**

    **Minimum of 2 scholarly sources**

    **Plagiarism and AI free**

    **A+ work required**