Nursing Discussion – 2 years ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Nursing Discussion
– 2 years ago
Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## BLOG.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.docx **## BLOG.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.docx** **Evidence Based Practice II** **DUE January 26, 2025** Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation In the…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## BLOG.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.docx
**## BLOG.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.docx**
**Evidence Based Practice II**
**DUE January 26, 2025**
Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation
In the first week of this course, you reviewed and reflected on the project management plan you developed for a practice change. Now, in the final weeks of the course, you have implemented this practice change. How is it going? What are the lasting impacts of this change? What have you learned from this experience?
Reflection of an experience, lessons learned, and/or sustainability of a project, demonstrates a clear understanding of process. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, necessary corrections, and next steps. As we move into the final weeks of the course and the practice change implementation, it will be important for you to consider what you learned and how to sustain the project moving forward.
For this Blog, consider what you have learned thus far from the project implementation and evaluation of implementation data. Consider your role, as a leader, in implementing the change for the problem. How has your role impacted the problem or change? How might you approach a future implementation differently?
**Reference:**
Clark J. (2011). Let's reflect: What is the point?
_British Journal of General Practice_,
_61_(593), 747. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142884/modules/items/5616626)
Learning Resources
[Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142884/pages/week-10-learning-resources?module_item_id=5616626)
· Gilmour, J. A., Mukerji, G., Segal, P., Sutton, L., Wong, R., Caplan, L., Whitham, D., & Halperin, I. (2019).
[Implementing change ideas, interpreting data and sustaining change in a quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS1499267118309948).
_Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 43_(4), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.02.007
· Nelson-Brantley, H. V., & Chipps, E. (2021).
[Implementation science and nursing leadership: Improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.](https://access.ovid.com/custom/redirector/index.html?dest=https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005110-202105000-00003&LSLINK=80&D=ovft).
_The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51_(5), 237–239. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001006
To Prepare
· Review the Learning Resources concerning how to analyze and reflect on project implementation.
· Consider what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation.
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **60 to >49.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date. | **49 to >38.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date. | **38 to >27.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date. | **27 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date. | | 60 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague's main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **20 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date. | **11 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date. | **6 to >2.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date. | **2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date. | | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **20 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date. | **11 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date. | **6 to >2.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date. | **2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date. | | 20 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |
**## BLOG.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.docx**
**Evidence Based Practice II**
**DUE January 26, 2025**
Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation
In the first week of this course, you reviewed and reflected on the project management plan you developed for a practice change. Now, in the final weeks of the course, you have implemented this practice change. How is it going? What are the lasting impacts of this change? What have you learned from this experience?
Reflection of an experience, lessons learned, and/or sustainability of a project, demonstrates a clear understanding of process. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, necessary corrections, and next steps. As we move into the final weeks of the course and the practice change implementation, it will be important for you to consider what you learned and how to sustain the project moving forward.
For this Blog, consider what you have learned thus far from the project implementation and evaluation of implementation data. Consider your role, as a leader, in implementing the change for the problem. How has your role impacted the problem or change? How might you approach a future implementation differently?
**Reference:**
Clark J. (2011). Let's reflect: What is the point?
_British Journal of General Practice_,
_61_(593), 747. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142884/modules/items/5616626)
Learning Resources
[Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142884/pages/week-10-learning-resources?module_item_id=5616626)
· Gilmour, J. A., Mukerji, G., Segal, P., Sutton, L., Wong, R., Caplan, L., Whitham, D., & Halperin, I. (2019).
[Implementing change ideas, interpreting data and sustaining change in a quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS1499267118309948).
_Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 43_(4), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.02.007
· Nelson-Brantley, H. V., & Chipps, E. (2021).
[Implementation science and nursing leadership: Improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.](https://access.ovid.com/custom/redirector/index.html?dest=https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005110-202105000-00003&LSLINK=80&D=ovft).
_The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51_(5), 237–239. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001006
To Prepare
· Review the Learning Resources concerning how to analyze and reflect on project implementation.
· Consider what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation.
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **60 to >49.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date. | **49 to >38.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date. | **38 to >27.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date. | **27 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date. | | 60 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague's main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **20 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date. | **11 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date. | **6 to >2.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date. | **2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date. | | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **20 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date. | **11 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date. | **6 to >2.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date. | **2 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date. | | 20 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |
Elected Office – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## DISCUSSION.HealthcarePolicyandAnalysis……docx **## DISCUSSION.HealthcarePolicyandAnalysis……docx** **Healthcare Policy and Analysis** DUE January 26, 2025 Elected Office What is the potential impact of nurses holding elected office? How might hea…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Elected Office
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## DISCUSSION.HealthcarePolicyandAnalysis……docx
**## DISCUSSION.HealthcarePolicyandAnalysis……docx**
**Healthcare Policy and Analysis**
DUE January 26, 2025
Elected Office
What is the potential impact of nurses holding elected office? How might healthcare policy advocacy change if nurses are seated at the table?
For this Discussion, you will consider what it takes to run for an elected office, as well as explore what is at stake for nurses to run for these positions. You will identify nurses elected to public office, and you will consider the impact of these positions. How might learning about policy and advocacy pave the wave for a future as an elected official?
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/modules/items/5623938)
Learning Resources
Required Resources
[Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/pages/week-8-10-learning-resources?module_item_id=5623938)
· Dawes, D. E. (2020).
_The political determinants of health_. Johns Hopkins University Press.
· Chapter 4, “How the Game is Played: Successful Employment of the Political Determinants of Health” (pp. 78–111)
· Porche, D. J. (2023).
_Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
· Chapter 13, “Board Governance and Policy Leadership” (pp. 185–192)
· Chapter 14, “Institutional and Organizational/ Association Policy” (pp. 193–199)
· Chapter 17, “Policy Institutes” (pp. 255–264)
· American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology. (2022).
[_Advocacy and policyLinks to an external site._](https://www.aana.com/advocacy) _._ https://www.aana.com/advocacy
· American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2022).
[_AANP advocacy: Championing the NP role and amplifying the NP voiceLinks to an external site._](https://www.aanp.org/advocacy) _._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy
· American Nurses Association. (2018).
[_ANA advocacy toolkitLinks to an external site._](https://rnaction.org/SitePages/toolkit.aspx) _._ https://rnaction.org/SitePages/toolkit.aspx
· American Nurses Association. (n.d.).
[_Nurses serving in congressLinks to an external site._](https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/federal/nurses-serving-in-congress/) _._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/federal/nurses-serving-in-congress/
· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Policy, Performance, and Evaluation. (2021).
[_Resources for writing briefs_ Links to an external site.](https://www.cdc.gov/policy/polaris/training/writing-briefs/index.html). https://www.cdc.gov/policy/polaris/training/writing-briefs/index.html
· IDRC. (n.d.).
[_How to write a policy brief_ Links to an external site.](https://idrc-crdi.ca/en/funding/resources-idrc-grantees/how-write-policy-brief). https://idrc-crdi.ca/en/funding/resources-idrc-grantees/how-write-policy-brief
· International Council of Nurses. (n.d.).
[https://www.icn.ch/Links to an external site.](https://www.icn.ch/)
· International Council of Nurses. (2022).
[_Nursing policyLinks to an external site._](https://www.icn.ch/nursing-policy) _._ https://www.icn.ch/nursing-policy
· National League for Nursing. (2022).
[_Public policyLinks to an external site._](https://www.nln.org/public-policy) _._ https://www.nln.org/public-policy
· National League for Nursing. (2022).
[_Toolkit homeLinks to an external site._](https://www.nln.org/education/teaching-resources/professional-development-programsteaching-resources/toolkits) _._ https://www.nln.org/education/teaching-resources/professional-development-programsteaching-resources/toolkits
· Open Secrets. (2021).
[_Health professionalsLinks to an external site._](https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=H01) _: Summary._ https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=H01
· Pitsker, K. (2019, November 26). How to run for local office.
[_Kiplinger_ Links to an external site.](https://www.kiplinger.com/article/business/t043-c000-s002-how-to-run-for-local-office.html). https://www.kiplinger.com/article/business/t043-c000-s002-how-to-run-for-local-office.html
·
[She Should RunLinks to an external site.](https://sheshouldrun.org/). (2020).
[https://sheshouldrun.org/Links to an external site.](https://sheshouldrun.org/) **Note:** Explore this site on the topic of “Running for Elected Office.” You will need to join (free) to access the self-quizzes and materials.
· United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable development goals:
[_17 goals to transform our worldLinks to an external site._](https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/) _._ https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
· Weakley, S., & Tarrega, M. (n.d.).
[_How to write a policy brief_ Links to an external site.](https://policyscotland.gla.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TSRFWritingaPolicyBrief.pdf). https://policyscotland.gla.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TSRFWritingaPolicyBrief.pdf
·
**Document:** [Global Issues Impacting Nursing](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/files/11127103?wrap=1) [Download Global Issues Impacting Nursing](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/files/11127103/download?download_frd=1)(PDF)
[Media](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/pages/week-8-10-learning-resources?module_item_id=5623938)
· American Nurses Association. (2021, May 11). RNAction:
[_When nurses speak, Washington listensLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJD60OucJn0) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJD60OucJn0
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 1 minute.
· Parks, M., & Weiner, C. (2019, October 19).
[_How to run for office_ Links to an external site.](https://www.npr.org/2019/10/15/770332855/how-to-run-for-office) [Multimedia]. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2019/10/15/770332855/how-to-run-for-office
To Prepare:
· Review resources about running for elected office.
· Consider what it might take—including resources, manpower, education, money, etc.—to run for office.
· Research nurses who have become elected officials.
· Consider why nurses might consider running for office.
By Day 3 of Week 10
**Post** a response detailing the following:
· What does it take to run for elected office? What are the resources you may need?
· After determining what it takes to run for office, identify an elected official that is a nurse (anywhere in the world), and then provide an introduction, with a picture, for this official.
· Finally, explain why running for office is important for nurses to consider.
**## DISCUSSION.HealthcarePolicyandAnalysis……docx**
**Healthcare Policy and Analysis**
DUE January 26, 2025
Elected Office
What is the potential impact of nurses holding elected office? How might healthcare policy advocacy change if nurses are seated at the table?
For this Discussion, you will consider what it takes to run for an elected office, as well as explore what is at stake for nurses to run for these positions. You will identify nurses elected to public office, and you will consider the impact of these positions. How might learning about policy and advocacy pave the wave for a future as an elected official?
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/modules/items/5623938)
Learning Resources
Required Resources
[Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/pages/week-8-10-learning-resources?module_item_id=5623938)
· Dawes, D. E. (2020).
_The political determinants of health_. Johns Hopkins University Press.
· Chapter 4, “How the Game is Played: Successful Employment of the Political Determinants of Health” (pp. 78–111)
· Porche, D. J. (2023).
_Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
· Chapter 13, “Board Governance and Policy Leadership” (pp. 185–192)
· Chapter 14, “Institutional and Organizational/ Association Policy” (pp. 193–199)
· Chapter 17, “Policy Institutes” (pp. 255–264)
· American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology. (2022).
[_Advocacy and policyLinks to an external site._](https://www.aana.com/advocacy) _._ https://www.aana.com/advocacy
· American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2022).
[_AANP advocacy: Championing the NP role and amplifying the NP voiceLinks to an external site._](https://www.aanp.org/advocacy) _._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy
· American Nurses Association. (2018).
[_ANA advocacy toolkitLinks to an external site._](https://rnaction.org/SitePages/toolkit.aspx) _._ https://rnaction.org/SitePages/toolkit.aspx
· American Nurses Association. (n.d.).
[_Nurses serving in congressLinks to an external site._](https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/federal/nurses-serving-in-congress/) _._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/federal/nurses-serving-in-congress/
· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Policy, Performance, and Evaluation. (2021).
[_Resources for writing briefs_ Links to an external site.](https://www.cdc.gov/policy/polaris/training/writing-briefs/index.html). https://www.cdc.gov/policy/polaris/training/writing-briefs/index.html
· IDRC. (n.d.).
[_How to write a policy brief_ Links to an external site.](https://idrc-crdi.ca/en/funding/resources-idrc-grantees/how-write-policy-brief). https://idrc-crdi.ca/en/funding/resources-idrc-grantees/how-write-policy-brief
· International Council of Nurses. (n.d.).
[https://www.icn.ch/Links to an external site.](https://www.icn.ch/)
· International Council of Nurses. (2022).
[_Nursing policyLinks to an external site._](https://www.icn.ch/nursing-policy) _._ https://www.icn.ch/nursing-policy
· National League for Nursing. (2022).
[_Public policyLinks to an external site._](https://www.nln.org/public-policy) _._ https://www.nln.org/public-policy
· National League for Nursing. (2022).
[_Toolkit homeLinks to an external site._](https://www.nln.org/education/teaching-resources/professional-development-programsteaching-resources/toolkits) _._ https://www.nln.org/education/teaching-resources/professional-development-programsteaching-resources/toolkits
· Open Secrets. (2021).
[_Health professionalsLinks to an external site._](https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=H01) _: Summary._ https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=H01
· Pitsker, K. (2019, November 26). How to run for local office.
[_Kiplinger_ Links to an external site.](https://www.kiplinger.com/article/business/t043-c000-s002-how-to-run-for-local-office.html). https://www.kiplinger.com/article/business/t043-c000-s002-how-to-run-for-local-office.html
·
[She Should RunLinks to an external site.](https://sheshouldrun.org/). (2020).
[https://sheshouldrun.org/Links to an external site.](https://sheshouldrun.org/) **Note:** Explore this site on the topic of “Running for Elected Office.” You will need to join (free) to access the self-quizzes and materials.
· United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable development goals:
[_17 goals to transform our worldLinks to an external site._](https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/) _._ https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
· Weakley, S., & Tarrega, M. (n.d.).
[_How to write a policy brief_ Links to an external site.](https://policyscotland.gla.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TSRFWritingaPolicyBrief.pdf). https://policyscotland.gla.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TSRFWritingaPolicyBrief.pdf
·
**Document:** [Global Issues Impacting Nursing](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/files/11127103?wrap=1) [Download Global Issues Impacting Nursing](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/files/11127103/download?download_frd=1)(PDF)
[Media](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144126/pages/week-8-10-learning-resources?module_item_id=5623938)
· American Nurses Association. (2021, May 11). RNAction:
[_When nurses speak, Washington listensLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJD60OucJn0) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJD60OucJn0
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 1 minute.
· Parks, M., & Weiner, C. (2019, October 19).
[_How to run for office_ Links to an external site.](https://www.npr.org/2019/10/15/770332855/how-to-run-for-office) [Multimedia]. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2019/10/15/770332855/how-to-run-for-office
To Prepare:
· Review resources about running for elected office.
· Consider what it might take—including resources, manpower, education, money, etc.—to run for office.
· Research nurses who have become elected officials.
· Consider why nurses might consider running for office.
By Day 3 of Week 10
**Post** a response detailing the following:
· What does it take to run for elected office? What are the resources you may need?
· After determining what it takes to run for office, identify an elected official that is a nurse (anywhere in the world), and then provide an introduction, with a picture, for this official.
· Finally, explain why running for office is important for nurses to consider.
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering As nurse leaders, what factors, other than patient advocacy, must Megan and Kenny consider when discerning the best clinical pathway for Joan?.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
– 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## NRNP6552week9cases.pdf **## NRNP6552week9cases.pdf** Case #1. Teresa. History of Present Illness (HPI): Teresa is a 34-year-old Hispanic G2P2002. She presents to your office today at 10-weeks post-partum (PP) for her 6-week PP check. She underwent a C-section for fai…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## NRNP6552week9cases.pdf
**## NRNP6552week9cases.pdf**
Case #1. Teresa.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Teresa is a 34-year-old Hispanic G2P2002. She presents to your office
today at 10-weeks post-partum (PP) for her 6-week PP check. She underwent a C-section for failure to
progress following a 20-hour labor with Pitocin augmentation. She was discharged from the hospital on
day 2 post-partum without complications. Teresa has had difficulty with breast feeding due to
discomfort in her suture line and terrible pain in her right breast since her discharge from the hospital.
She reports occasional chills- she has not measured her temperature at home. Teresa was seen by the
lactation consultant while in the hospital but “nothing is working” and her son “cries all the time”. She
is afraid to feed her son formula as her mother-in-law wants her to “keep trying to breastfeed”. Teresa
tells you she feels as if she has failed her son- “it was so easy with my first baby, I know my husband
thinks I am a bad mother”.
Prior medical history: None. Prior surgical history: Appendectomy (2000)
Current medications: Prenatal vitamins, stool softener. Allergies: None
OB- GYN History: NSVD (2019) healthy female 7lb 10oz; C-section healthy male 8 lbs. 8 oz as per HPI.
Menarche age 12, cycle length- 5 days- frequency every 28 days- 4-5 tampons per day. No history of
sexually transmitted infections (STDs). History of abnormal pap smear in 2019 which was followed by a
normal colposcopy. Last pap (during recent prenatal care) reported normal. HIV negative.
LMP: First PP menstrual cycle last week. Has not resumed sexual activity PP. Contraception history:
Oral contraceptives, condoms.
Social history: Lives with husband, mother- in- law, and children. Stay at home mom. Denies EtOH or
recreational drug use, never smoker. Her family speaks Spanish at home; she is fluent in English.
Family history: Unremarkable.
Review of Systems (ROS): Negative except as noted in HPI.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 110/70, P: 90, RR: 18, T: 38.4, Weight: 132 lbs.
Teresa’s C-section suture line is healing well without erythema or tenderness. No vaginal discharge or
lesions, no cervical motion tenderness (CMT), uterus normal size firm and non-tender. On breast exam,
you do note an erythematous, swollen, and painful area to the right breast. Her physical exam is
otherwise unremarkable.
Case #2. Joanna.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Joanna is a 28-year-old Caucasian G4P1021. She is single, living with her
father and 2-year-old daughter. She has a part-time job as a server at the local restaurant; she does not
have health insurance. Joanna presents to your office at the community health center today stating she
is pregnant and wants to receive OB care. She tells you that she has not yet been evaluated for this
pregnancy as she was afraid to take time off from work and did not have enough money to pay for the
visit.
Prior medical history: None. Prior surgical history: None
Current medications: None. Allergies: Penicillin
OB- GYN History: NSVD (2021) healthy female 6lb 8oz. Menarche age 10, cycle length- 3 days- irregular
cycles since menarche- frequency every 20-30 days- 2-3 tampons per day. No history of sexually
transmitted infections (STDs). Joanna’s OB history includes two first trimester elective terminations of
pregnancy, and 1 term female infant delivered vaginally at 37 weeks. Denies any complications during
her prior pregnancy however, she notes that her daughter experienced hypoglycemia and respiratory
distress, spending 2 weeks in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
LMP: Approximately 5 months ago. Contraception history: Condoms “sometimes”.
Social history: Lives with her retired father and daughter. Restaurant server. Denies EtOH or
recreational drug use. Currently smoking 1 pack of cigarettes/ day (15 pack-year history). She and her
mother are still paying for her daughter’s NICU stay. The child’s father is not involved in any way.
Family history: Mother (deceased age 55)- Type 2 diabetes.
Review of Systems (ROS): Unremarkable with exception of dysuria (“it burns when I pee”) over the past
1-week. Denies fever, chills, abdominal or flank pain. Thick white vaginal discharge and “itching” for the
past month.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 108/68, P: 72, RR: 18, T: 37.3, Weight 144lbs
On physical exam you palpate a fundal height of approximately 20cm with an audible fetal heart tone
(FHT) of 160. On speculum exam you visualize a multiparous cervix without lesions; bluish discoloration
of the cervix, vagina, and vulva is noted with a thick, white discharge. There is no cervical motion
tenderness (CMT) on exam. The uterus is anteverted, non- tender, with fundus palpable at the
umbilicus. Joanna’s physical exam is otherwise unremarkable.
Wet mount reveals budding yeast. Urine dipstick with 1+ leukocytes, trace blood and 2+ glucose.
Case #3. Monica.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Monica is a 43-year-old African- American G3P2102. She is currently
separated from her husband of 20 years and is working full-time as a legal secretary. About 8 months
ago, Monica started having irregular periods with heavier than usual flow until she stopped having
periods or any vaginal bleeding about 3 months ago. She is currently recovering from a “stomach flu”
however, she reports daily nausea, vomiting, bloating and decreased appetite over the past 3 weeks.
She is worried because she has gained 12 pounds over the last 3 months “due to menopause”. She
comes to the clinic today to discuss menopause symptoms and hormone replacement therapy.
Prior medical history: Hypertension (2010)- well controlled on current antihypertensive
Prior surgical history: Cholecystectomy (2015)
Current medications: Lisinopril 10mg daily. Allergies: None
OB- GYN History: NSVD x 2 (2015, 2019) healthy female 6lb 8oz; healthy female 7lbs 6oz. First trimester
miscarriage (9 weeks) in 2014. Menarche age 15, cycle length-7 days- frequency every 28 days- 5-6 pads
per day. No history of sexually transmitted infections (STDs). No history of abnormal pap (last pap 2
years ago).
LMP: Approximately 3 months ago. Contraception history: Condoms; past use of oral contraceptives.
Social history: Lives with her elderly father, 2 daughters. Separated from her husband for 6 months.
Family history: Mother deceased (age 60)- breast cancer. Father alive (age 70)- hypertension.
Review of Systems (ROS): Unremarkable with exception of as noted in HPI.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 130/78, P: 78, RR: 18, T: 36.1 Weight: 152 lbs.
Physical exam is unremarkable with exception of a palpable 12- 14 weeks size uterus on bimanual. You
check a for a fetal heartbeat and obtain a heart tone of 145 via doppler. The intake nurse reports that a
urine pregnancy test came back positive.
Monica is in disbelief.
Case #4. Laura.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Laura is a 16-year-old Caucasian G1P0. She presents to your office after
missing her second period. She is “worried” as she “always gets her period on time”. She is in high
school- about to enter the 11th grade. She lives with her grandmother and 2 older siblings. Her urine
pregnancy test in clinic today is positive.
Laura is sexually active with her boyfriend; they do not use condoms. He “pulls out” as birth control.
She reports being treated at the health department for chlamydia and gonorrhea earlier this year. She
thinks her boyfriend was treated but he is not answering her calls since she told him about the missed
periods a few weeks ago. She reports daily nausea, vomiting and dysuria for the past 2 weeks.
Prior medical history: None. Prior surgical history: None
Current medications: None. Allergies: None
OB- GYN History: Menarche age 12, cycle length-7 days- frequency every 30 days- 2 tampons per day.
History of chlamydia and gonorrhea (GC) in the past year. Last pap reported normal at the time of
chlamydia/ GC diagnosis. Has not received Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
LMP: Approximately 2 months ago. Contraception history: Withdrawal
Social history: Lives with her grandmother, siblings. Denies EtOH or recreational drug use. Currently
smoking 1 pack of cigarettes/ day
Family history: Mother deceased at age 42- drug overdose. Father unknown.
Review of Systems (ROS): Unremarkable with exception of as noted in HPI.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 110/68, P: 80, RR: 18, T: 37.1 Weight: 110 lbs. (states usual weight 120 lbs.).
Physical exam is unremarkable with exception of a cloudy, yellow mucoid cervical discharge on speculum
exam; friable appearance of the cervix with cervical motion tenderness (CMT). You palpate an 8-week
size uterus on bimanual.
Laura’s urine reveals 2+ ketones, 2+ nitrates, and 3+ leukocytes.
Case 5: Denise.
Denise is a 30-year-old Black female G0 with a history of seizure disorder who presents to clinic for her
annual well visit. She is excited to tell you that she is getting married in 2 months and they are planning
to start a family “right away”. Denise went to see her gynecologist last month who told her she was
“young and healthy- not to worry, everything will work out fine”. No labs were done at the gyn visit; she
hasn’t started prenatal vitamins. She comes to see you today as she “wants to be sure that she is up to
date on everything she needs” before the wedding.
Prior medical history: Seizure disorder (diagnosed at age 18). Prior surgical history: None
Current medications: Levetiracetam 500mg 2 times a day. Allergies: None
Reports she believes she has had all childhood vaccinations. Has not received COVID or influenza
vaccines. She is not sure about Hepatitis B or Tdap.
OB- GYN History: G0. Menarche age 14, cycle length-5 days- frequency every 28 days- 2-3 pads per day.
No history of sexually transmitted infection. Last PAP 2020, no history of abnormal PAP. Has not
received Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Her only sexual partner is her current fiancé (male). LMP
was approximately 2 weeks ago. Contraception history: Condoms.
Social history: Sixth grade teacher. Lives with her fiancé. Denies EtOH or recreational drug use. Has
never smoked cigarettes or vaped.
Family history: Mother (age 56) alive and well. Father deceased at age 50 from lung cancer (smoker).
Sister aged 21- healthy. Maternal grandmother alive age 88 (hysterectomy for fibroid uterus). Maternal
grandfather deceased age 78 (unknown cause). Paternal grandparents- unknown.
Review of Systems (ROS).
Constitutional: No Weight Change, No Fever, No Chills, No Night Sweats, No Fatigue, No Malaise
ENT/Mouth: No Hearing Changes, No Ear Pain, No Nasal Congestion, No Sinus Pain, No Hoarseness, No
sore throat, No Rhinorrhea, No Swallowing Difficulty
Eyes: No Eye Pain, No Swelling, No Redness, No Foreign Body, No Discharge, No Vision Changes
Cardiovascular: No Chest Pain, No SOB, No Dyspnea on Exertion, No Orthopnea, No Claudication, No
Edema, No Palpitations
Respiratory: No Cough, No Sputum, No Wheezing, No Smoke Exposure, No Dyspnea
Gastrointestinal: No Nausea, No Vomiting, No Diarrhea, Occasional Constipation (managed with diet),
No Pain, No Heartburn, No Anorexia, No Dysphagia, No Hematochezia, No Melena, No Flatulence, No
Jaundice
Genitourinary: No Dysmenorrhea, No Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding, No Dyspareunia, No Dysuria, No
Urinary Frequency, No Hematuria, No Urinary Incontinence, No Urgency, No Flank Pain, No Urinary Flow
Changes, No Hesitancy
Musculoskeletal: No Arthralgias, No Myalgias, No Joint Swelling, No Joint Stiffness, No Back Pain, No
Neck Pain, No Injury History
Skin: No Skin Lesions, No Pruritis, No Hair Changes, No Breast/Skin Changes, No Nipple Discharge
Neuro: No Weakness, No Numbness, No Paresthesia, No Loss of Consciousness, No Syncope, No
Dizziness, No Headache, No Coordination Changes. Last reported seizure was 10 years ago. Followed by
neurologist- last seen in 2023.
Psych: No Anxiety/Panic, No Depression, No Insomnia. No Memory Changes. Denies Violence/Abuse,
No Eating Concerns
Heme/Lymph: No Bruising, No Bleeding, No Transfusion History, No Lymphadenopathy
Endocrine: No Polyuria, No Polydipsia, No Temperature Intolerance
Physical Exam (PE).
VS: BP: 130/84, P: 80, RR: 18, T: 37.1, Weight: 118 lbs. BMI 19.0
General: Awake, alert, and oriented. No acute distress. Well developed, hydrated, and nourished.
Appears stated age.
Skin: Skin in warm, dry, and intact without rashes or lesions. Appropriate color for ethnicity. Nailbeds
pink with no cyanosis or clubbing.
Head: The head is normocephalic and atraumatic without tenderness, visible or palpable masses,
depressions, or scarring. Hair is of normal texture and evenly distributed.
Eyes: Conjunctivae are clear without exudates or hemorrhage. Sclera is non-icteric. No signs of
nystagmus. Eyelids are normal in appearance without swelling or lesions.
Ears: The external ear and ear canal are non-tender and without swelling.
Nose: Nasal mucosa is pink and moist. Nares are patent bilaterally.
Throat: Oral mucosa is pink and moist with good dentition. Tongue normal in appearance without lesions
and with good symmetrical movement. The pharynx is normal in appearance without tonsillar swelling
or exudates.
Neck: The neck is supple without adenopathy. Trachea is midline. Thyroid gland is normal without
masses.
Cardiac: The external chest is normal in appearance. Heart rate and rhythm are normal. No murmurs,
gallops, or rubs are auscultated.
Respiratory: The chest wall is symmetric and without deformity. Lung sounds are clear in all lobes
bilaterally without rales, rhonchi, or wheezes.
Breasts: Symmetrical. No Masses, Dimpling or Nipple Discharge. No Axillary Adenopathy.
Abdominal: Abdomen is soft, symmetric, and non-tender without distention. There are no visible lesions
or scars. Umbilicus is midline without herniation. Bowel sounds are present and normoactive in all four
quadrants. No masses, hepatomegaly, or splenomegaly are noted.
Genital: External genitalia is normal in appearance without lesions, swelling, masses or tenderness.
Vagina is pink and moist without lesions or discharge. Cervix is non-tender without lesions. Uterus is
anteflexed, non-tender and normal in size. Ovaries are non-tender without palpable masses or
enlargement.
Extremities: Upper and lower extremities are atraumatic in appearance without tenderness or deformity.
No swelling or erythema.
Neurological: The patient is awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, and time with normal speech.
Motor function is normal with muscle strength 5/5 bilaterally to upper and lower extremities. Sensation
is intact bilaterally. Reflexes 2+ bilaterally. No gait abnormalities are appreciated.
Psychiatric: Appropriate mood and affect. Good judgement and insight. No suicidal or homicidal
ideation.
What is your pre conceptual plan for Denise? What are her risks?
Keep in mind that the goal of pre-conceptual care is to reduce the risk of adverse health effects for the
woman, fetus, and neonate- optimize health and prevention; address modifiable risk factors, chronic
illnesses, and medication safety.
**## NRNP6552week9cases.pdf**
Case #1. Teresa.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Teresa is a 34-year-old Hispanic G2P2002. She presents to your office
today at 10-weeks post-partum (PP) for her 6-week PP check. She underwent a C-section for failure to
progress following a 20-hour labor with Pitocin augmentation. She was discharged from the hospital on
day 2 post-partum without complications. Teresa has had difficulty with breast feeding due to
discomfort in her suture line and terrible pain in her right breast since her discharge from the hospital.
She reports occasional chills- she has not measured her temperature at home. Teresa was seen by the
lactation consultant while in the hospital but “nothing is working” and her son “cries all the time”. She
is afraid to feed her son formula as her mother-in-law wants her to “keep trying to breastfeed”. Teresa
tells you she feels as if she has failed her son- “it was so easy with my first baby, I know my husband
thinks I am a bad mother”.
Prior medical history: None. Prior surgical history: Appendectomy (2000)
Current medications: Prenatal vitamins, stool softener. Allergies: None
OB- GYN History: NSVD (2019) healthy female 7lb 10oz; C-section healthy male 8 lbs. 8 oz as per HPI.
Menarche age 12, cycle length- 5 days- frequency every 28 days- 4-5 tampons per day. No history of
sexually transmitted infections (STDs). History of abnormal pap smear in 2019 which was followed by a
normal colposcopy. Last pap (during recent prenatal care) reported normal. HIV negative.
LMP: First PP menstrual cycle last week. Has not resumed sexual activity PP. Contraception history:
Oral contraceptives, condoms.
Social history: Lives with husband, mother- in- law, and children. Stay at home mom. Denies EtOH or
recreational drug use, never smoker. Her family speaks Spanish at home; she is fluent in English.
Family history: Unremarkable.
Review of Systems (ROS): Negative except as noted in HPI.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 110/70, P: 90, RR: 18, T: 38.4, Weight: 132 lbs.
Teresa’s C-section suture line is healing well without erythema or tenderness. No vaginal discharge or
lesions, no cervical motion tenderness (CMT), uterus normal size firm and non-tender. On breast exam,
you do note an erythematous, swollen, and painful area to the right breast. Her physical exam is
otherwise unremarkable.
Case #2. Joanna.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Joanna is a 28-year-old Caucasian G4P1021. She is single, living with her
father and 2-year-old daughter. She has a part-time job as a server at the local restaurant; she does not
have health insurance. Joanna presents to your office at the community health center today stating she
is pregnant and wants to receive OB care. She tells you that she has not yet been evaluated for this
pregnancy as she was afraid to take time off from work and did not have enough money to pay for the
visit.
Prior medical history: None. Prior surgical history: None
Current medications: None. Allergies: Penicillin
OB- GYN History: NSVD (2021) healthy female 6lb 8oz. Menarche age 10, cycle length- 3 days- irregular
cycles since menarche- frequency every 20-30 days- 2-3 tampons per day. No history of sexually
transmitted infections (STDs). Joanna’s OB history includes two first trimester elective terminations of
pregnancy, and 1 term female infant delivered vaginally at 37 weeks. Denies any complications during
her prior pregnancy however, she notes that her daughter experienced hypoglycemia and respiratory
distress, spending 2 weeks in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
LMP: Approximately 5 months ago. Contraception history: Condoms “sometimes”.
Social history: Lives with her retired father and daughter. Restaurant server. Denies EtOH or
recreational drug use. Currently smoking 1 pack of cigarettes/ day (15 pack-year history). She and her
mother are still paying for her daughter’s NICU stay. The child’s father is not involved in any way.
Family history: Mother (deceased age 55)- Type 2 diabetes.
Review of Systems (ROS): Unremarkable with exception of dysuria (“it burns when I pee”) over the past
1-week. Denies fever, chills, abdominal or flank pain. Thick white vaginal discharge and “itching” for the
past month.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 108/68, P: 72, RR: 18, T: 37.3, Weight 144lbs
On physical exam you palpate a fundal height of approximately 20cm with an audible fetal heart tone
(FHT) of 160. On speculum exam you visualize a multiparous cervix without lesions; bluish discoloration
of the cervix, vagina, and vulva is noted with a thick, white discharge. There is no cervical motion
tenderness (CMT) on exam. The uterus is anteverted, non- tender, with fundus palpable at the
umbilicus. Joanna’s physical exam is otherwise unremarkable.
Wet mount reveals budding yeast. Urine dipstick with 1+ leukocytes, trace blood and 2+ glucose.
Case #3. Monica.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Monica is a 43-year-old African- American G3P2102. She is currently
separated from her husband of 20 years and is working full-time as a legal secretary. About 8 months
ago, Monica started having irregular periods with heavier than usual flow until she stopped having
periods or any vaginal bleeding about 3 months ago. She is currently recovering from a “stomach flu”
however, she reports daily nausea, vomiting, bloating and decreased appetite over the past 3 weeks.
She is worried because she has gained 12 pounds over the last 3 months “due to menopause”. She
comes to the clinic today to discuss menopause symptoms and hormone replacement therapy.
Prior medical history: Hypertension (2010)- well controlled on current antihypertensive
Prior surgical history: Cholecystectomy (2015)
Current medications: Lisinopril 10mg daily. Allergies: None
OB- GYN History: NSVD x 2 (2015, 2019) healthy female 6lb 8oz; healthy female 7lbs 6oz. First trimester
miscarriage (9 weeks) in 2014. Menarche age 15, cycle length-7 days- frequency every 28 days- 5-6 pads
per day. No history of sexually transmitted infections (STDs). No history of abnormal pap (last pap 2
years ago).
LMP: Approximately 3 months ago. Contraception history: Condoms; past use of oral contraceptives.
Social history: Lives with her elderly father, 2 daughters. Separated from her husband for 6 months.
Family history: Mother deceased (age 60)- breast cancer. Father alive (age 70)- hypertension.
Review of Systems (ROS): Unremarkable with exception of as noted in HPI.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 130/78, P: 78, RR: 18, T: 36.1 Weight: 152 lbs.
Physical exam is unremarkable with exception of a palpable 12- 14 weeks size uterus on bimanual. You
check a for a fetal heartbeat and obtain a heart tone of 145 via doppler. The intake nurse reports that a
urine pregnancy test came back positive.
Monica is in disbelief.
Case #4. Laura.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Laura is a 16-year-old Caucasian G1P0. She presents to your office after
missing her second period. She is “worried” as she “always gets her period on time”. She is in high
school- about to enter the 11th grade. She lives with her grandmother and 2 older siblings. Her urine
pregnancy test in clinic today is positive.
Laura is sexually active with her boyfriend; they do not use condoms. He “pulls out” as birth control.
She reports being treated at the health department for chlamydia and gonorrhea earlier this year. She
thinks her boyfriend was treated but he is not answering her calls since she told him about the missed
periods a few weeks ago. She reports daily nausea, vomiting and dysuria for the past 2 weeks.
Prior medical history: None. Prior surgical history: None
Current medications: None. Allergies: None
OB- GYN History: Menarche age 12, cycle length-7 days- frequency every 30 days- 2 tampons per day.
History of chlamydia and gonorrhea (GC) in the past year. Last pap reported normal at the time of
chlamydia/ GC diagnosis. Has not received Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
LMP: Approximately 2 months ago. Contraception history: Withdrawal
Social history: Lives with her grandmother, siblings. Denies EtOH or recreational drug use. Currently
smoking 1 pack of cigarettes/ day
Family history: Mother deceased at age 42- drug overdose. Father unknown.
Review of Systems (ROS): Unremarkable with exception of as noted in HPI.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 110/68, P: 80, RR: 18, T: 37.1 Weight: 110 lbs. (states usual weight 120 lbs.).
Physical exam is unremarkable with exception of a cloudy, yellow mucoid cervical discharge on speculum
exam; friable appearance of the cervix with cervical motion tenderness (CMT). You palpate an 8-week
size uterus on bimanual.
Laura’s urine reveals 2+ ketones, 2+ nitrates, and 3+ leukocytes.
Case 5: Denise.
Denise is a 30-year-old Black female G0 with a history of seizure disorder who presents to clinic for her
annual well visit. She is excited to tell you that she is getting married in 2 months and they are planning
to start a family “right away”. Denise went to see her gynecologist last month who told her she was
“young and healthy- not to worry, everything will work out fine”. No labs were done at the gyn visit; she
hasn’t started prenatal vitamins. She comes to see you today as she “wants to be sure that she is up to
date on everything she needs” before the wedding.
Prior medical history: Seizure disorder (diagnosed at age 18). Prior surgical history: None
Current medications: Levetiracetam 500mg 2 times a day. Allergies: None
Reports she believes she has had all childhood vaccinations. Has not received COVID or influenza
vaccines. She is not sure about Hepatitis B or Tdap.
OB- GYN History: G0. Menarche age 14, cycle length-5 days- frequency every 28 days- 2-3 pads per day.
No history of sexually transmitted infection. Last PAP 2020, no history of abnormal PAP. Has not
received Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Her only sexual partner is her current fiancé (male). LMP
was approximately 2 weeks ago. Contraception history: Condoms.
Social history: Sixth grade teacher. Lives with her fiancé. Denies EtOH or recreational drug use. Has
never smoked cigarettes or vaped.
Family history: Mother (age 56) alive and well. Father deceased at age 50 from lung cancer (smoker).
Sister aged 21- healthy. Maternal grandmother alive age 88 (hysterectomy for fibroid uterus). Maternal
grandfather deceased age 78 (unknown cause). Paternal grandparents- unknown.
Review of Systems (ROS).
Constitutional: No Weight Change, No Fever, No Chills, No Night Sweats, No Fatigue, No Malaise
ENT/Mouth: No Hearing Changes, No Ear Pain, No Nasal Congestion, No Sinus Pain, No Hoarseness, No
sore throat, No Rhinorrhea, No Swallowing Difficulty
Eyes: No Eye Pain, No Swelling, No Redness, No Foreign Body, No Discharge, No Vision Changes
Cardiovascular: No Chest Pain, No SOB, No Dyspnea on Exertion, No Orthopnea, No Claudication, No
Edema, No Palpitations
Respiratory: No Cough, No Sputum, No Wheezing, No Smoke Exposure, No Dyspnea
Gastrointestinal: No Nausea, No Vomiting, No Diarrhea, Occasional Constipation (managed with diet),
No Pain, No Heartburn, No Anorexia, No Dysphagia, No Hematochezia, No Melena, No Flatulence, No
Jaundice
Genitourinary: No Dysmenorrhea, No Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding, No Dyspareunia, No Dysuria, No
Urinary Frequency, No Hematuria, No Urinary Incontinence, No Urgency, No Flank Pain, No Urinary Flow
Changes, No Hesitancy
Musculoskeletal: No Arthralgias, No Myalgias, No Joint Swelling, No Joint Stiffness, No Back Pain, No
Neck Pain, No Injury History
Skin: No Skin Lesions, No Pruritis, No Hair Changes, No Breast/Skin Changes, No Nipple Discharge
Neuro: No Weakness, No Numbness, No Paresthesia, No Loss of Consciousness, No Syncope, No
Dizziness, No Headache, No Coordination Changes. Last reported seizure was 10 years ago. Followed by
neurologist- last seen in 2023.
Psych: No Anxiety/Panic, No Depression, No Insomnia. No Memory Changes. Denies Violence/Abuse,
No Eating Concerns
Heme/Lymph: No Bruising, No Bleeding, No Transfusion History, No Lymphadenopathy
Endocrine: No Polyuria, No Polydipsia, No Temperature Intolerance
Physical Exam (PE).
VS: BP: 130/84, P: 80, RR: 18, T: 37.1, Weight: 118 lbs. BMI 19.0
General: Awake, alert, and oriented. No acute distress. Well developed, hydrated, and nourished.
Appears stated age.
Skin: Skin in warm, dry, and intact without rashes or lesions. Appropriate color for ethnicity. Nailbeds
pink with no cyanosis or clubbing.
Head: The head is normocephalic and atraumatic without tenderness, visible or palpable masses,
depressions, or scarring. Hair is of normal texture and evenly distributed.
Eyes: Conjunctivae are clear without exudates or hemorrhage. Sclera is non-icteric. No signs of
nystagmus. Eyelids are normal in appearance without swelling or lesions.
Ears: The external ear and ear canal are non-tender and without swelling.
Nose: Nasal mucosa is pink and moist. Nares are patent bilaterally.
Throat: Oral mucosa is pink and moist with good dentition. Tongue normal in appearance without lesions
and with good symmetrical movement. The pharynx is normal in appearance without tonsillar swelling
or exudates.
Neck: The neck is supple without adenopathy. Trachea is midline. Thyroid gland is normal without
masses.
Cardiac: The external chest is normal in appearance. Heart rate and rhythm are normal. No murmurs,
gallops, or rubs are auscultated.
Respiratory: The chest wall is symmetric and without deformity. Lung sounds are clear in all lobes
bilaterally without rales, rhonchi, or wheezes.
Breasts: Symmetrical. No Masses, Dimpling or Nipple Discharge. No Axillary Adenopathy.
Abdominal: Abdomen is soft, symmetric, and non-tender without distention. There are no visible lesions
or scars. Umbilicus is midline without herniation. Bowel sounds are present and normoactive in all four
quadrants. No masses, hepatomegaly, or splenomegaly are noted.
Genital: External genitalia is normal in appearance without lesions, swelling, masses or tenderness.
Vagina is pink and moist without lesions or discharge. Cervix is non-tender without lesions. Uterus is
anteflexed, non-tender and normal in size. Ovaries are non-tender without palpable masses or
enlargement.
Extremities: Upper and lower extremities are atraumatic in appearance without tenderness or deformity.
No swelling or erythema.
Neurological: The patient is awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, and time with normal speech.
Motor function is normal with muscle strength 5/5 bilaterally to upper and lower extremities. Sensation
is intact bilaterally. Reflexes 2+ bilaterally. No gait abnormalities are appreciated.
Psychiatric: Appropriate mood and affect. Good judgement and insight. No suicidal or homicidal
ideation.
What is your pre conceptual plan for Denise? What are her risks?
Keep in mind that the goal of pre-conceptual care is to reduce the risk of adverse health effects for the
woman, fetus, and neonate- optimize health and prevention; address modifiable risk factors, chronic
illnesses, and medication safety.
see attached – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## unit9discussioninstructions.docx **## unit9discussioninstructions.docx** **Nurse Practitioner Organizations** · Identify a national and state (PA-Pennsylvania) organization for nurse practitioners. · What are the benefits to joining these organizations? …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →see attached
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## unit9discussioninstructions.docx
**## unit9discussioninstructions.docx**
**Nurse Practitioner Organizations**
· Identify a national and state (PA-Pennsylvania) organization for nurse practitioners.
· What are the benefits to joining these organizations?
· What can these organizations do to further practice in your state?
· What is the process for joining, and can you join as a student?
**## unit9discussioninstructions.docx**
**Nurse Practitioner Organizations**
· Identify a national and state (PA-Pennsylvania) organization for nurse practitioners.
· What are the benefits to joining these organizations?
· What can these organizations do to further practice in your state?
· What is the process for joining, and can you join as a student?
I need help with 5 week assignment – 2 years ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →I need help with 5 week assignment
– 2 years ago
Please see instructions and files. – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## Instruction_Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibliographyonTechnologyinNursing.pdf – Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibonTechinNursingPDF.png – examplar2.pdf **## Instruction_Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibliographyonTec…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Please see instructions and files.
– 2 years ago
**files (3)**
– ## Instruction_Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibliographyonTechnologyinNursing.pdf
– Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibonTechinNursingPDF.png
– examplar2.pdf
**## Instruction_Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibliographyonTechnologyinNursing.pdf**
Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated Bibliography on Technology in
Nursing
First, review the technologies presented in the Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated
Bib on Tech in Nursing [PDF]
resource and select one of the options to use as the focus for this assessment.
Next prepare a 4 page paper in which you introduce your selected technology and
describe at least four peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of your selected
technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. You will conclude your
paper by summarizing why you recommend a particular technology by underscoring the
evidence-based resources you presented. Be sure that your paper includes all of the
following elements:
● Introduction to the Selected Technology Topic
○ What is your rationale for selecting this particular technology
topic? What is interesting about it?
○ What research process did you employ?
■ Which databases did you use?
■ Which search terms did you use?
■ Note: In this section of your bibliography, you may
use first-person since you are asked to describe
your rationale for selecting the topic and the
research strategies you employed. Use third
person in the rest of the bibliography, however.
● Annotation Elements
○ For each resource, include the full reference followed by the
annotation.
○ Explain the focus of the research or review article you chose.
○ Provide a summary overview of the publication.
■ According to this source, what is the impact of this
technology on patient safety and quality of care?
■ According to this source, what is the relevance of
this technology to nursing practice and the work of
the interdisciplinary health care team?
■ Why did you select this publication to write about
out of the many possible options? In other words,
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1)
make the case as to why this resource is important
for health care practitioners to read.
● Summary of Recommendation
○ How would you tie together the key learnings from each of the
four publications you examined?
○ What organizational factors influence the selection of a
technology in a health care setting? Consider such factors as
organizational policies, resources, culture/social norms,
commitment, training programs, and/or employee
empowerment.
○ How would you justify the implementation and use of the
technology in a health care setting? This is the section where
you will justify (prove) that the implementation of the
patient care technology is appropriate or not. The evidence
should be cited from the literature that was noted in the
annotated bibliography.
■ Consider the impact of the technology on the
health care organization, patient care/satisfaction,
and interdisciplinary team productivity, satisfaction,
and retention.
● Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that
detract from the overall message.
● Length: 4–6-typed, double-spaced pages.
● Number of resources: Cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed publications, not
websites.
● Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
● APA: Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic entries.
Refer to Evidence and APA as needed.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
● Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired
outcomes.
○ Analyze current evidence on the impact of a selected patient
care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the
interdisciplinary team.
○ Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected
patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and
the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation.
[https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=1540](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=1540)
● Competency 4: Recommend the use of a technology to enhance quality
and safety standards for patients.
○ Describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a
technology in the health care setting.
○ Justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in
a health care setting.
● Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate
use of health information and patient care technologies.
○ Create a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated
bibliography that is generally free from errors in grammar,
punctuation, and spelling.
○ Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic
entries
**Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibonTechinNursingPDF.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evidence-basedproposalandannotatedbibontechinnursingpdf-png)
**examplar2.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/examplar2-pdf)
**examplar2.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/examplar2-pdf)
**## Instruction_Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibliographyonTechnologyinNursing.pdf**
Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated Bibliography on Technology in
Nursing
First, review the technologies presented in the Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated
Bib on Tech in Nursing [PDF]
resource and select one of the options to use as the focus for this assessment.
Next prepare a 4 page paper in which you introduce your selected technology and
describe at least four peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of your selected
technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. You will conclude your
paper by summarizing why you recommend a particular technology by underscoring the
evidence-based resources you presented. Be sure that your paper includes all of the
following elements:
● Introduction to the Selected Technology Topic
○ What is your rationale for selecting this particular technology
topic? What is interesting about it?
○ What research process did you employ?
■ Which databases did you use?
■ Which search terms did you use?
■ Note: In this section of your bibliography, you may
use first-person since you are asked to describe
your rationale for selecting the topic and the
research strategies you employed. Use third
person in the rest of the bibliography, however.
● Annotation Elements
○ For each resource, include the full reference followed by the
annotation.
○ Explain the focus of the research or review article you chose.
○ Provide a summary overview of the publication.
■ According to this source, what is the impact of this
technology on patient safety and quality of care?
■ According to this source, what is the relevance of
this technology to nursing practice and the work of
the interdisciplinary health care team?
■ Why did you select this publication to write about
out of the many possible options? In other words,
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1)
make the case as to why this resource is important
for health care practitioners to read.
● Summary of Recommendation
○ How would you tie together the key learnings from each of the
four publications you examined?
○ What organizational factors influence the selection of a
technology in a health care setting? Consider such factors as
organizational policies, resources, culture/social norms,
commitment, training programs, and/or employee
empowerment.
○ How would you justify the implementation and use of the
technology in a health care setting? This is the section where
you will justify (prove) that the implementation of the
patient care technology is appropriate or not. The evidence
should be cited from the literature that was noted in the
annotated bibliography.
■ Consider the impact of the technology on the
health care organization, patient care/satisfaction,
and interdisciplinary team productivity, satisfaction,
and retention.
● Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that
detract from the overall message.
● Length: 4–6-typed, double-spaced pages.
● Number of resources: Cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed publications, not
websites.
● Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
● APA: Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic entries.
Refer to Evidence and APA as needed.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
● Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired
outcomes.
○ Analyze current evidence on the impact of a selected patient
care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the
interdisciplinary team.
○ Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected
patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and
the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation.
[https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=1540](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=1540)
● Competency 4: Recommend the use of a technology to enhance quality
and safety standards for patients.
○ Describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a
technology in the health care setting.
○ Justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in
a health care setting.
● Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate
use of health information and patient care technologies.
○ Create a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated
bibliography that is generally free from errors in grammar,
punctuation, and spelling.
○ Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic
entries
**Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibonTechinNursingPDF.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evidence-basedproposalandannotatedbibontechinnursingpdf-png)
**examplar2.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/examplar2-pdf)
**## Instruction_Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibliographyonTechnologyinNursing.pdf**
Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated Bibliography on Technology in
Nursing
First, review the technologies presented in the Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated
Bib on Tech in Nursing [PDF]
resource and select one of the options to use as the focus for this assessment.
Next prepare a 4 page paper in which you introduce your selected technology and
describe at least four peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of your selected
technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. You will conclude your
paper by summarizing why you recommend a particular technology by underscoring the
evidence-based resources you presented. Be sure that your paper includes all of the
following elements:
● Introduction to the Selected Technology Topic
○ What is your rationale for selecting this particular technology
topic? What is interesting about it?
○ What research process did you employ?
■ Which databases did you use?
■ Which search terms did you use?
■ Note: In this section of your bibliography, you may
use first-person since you are asked to describe
your rationale for selecting the topic and the
research strategies you employed. Use third
person in the rest of the bibliography, however.
● Annotation Elements
○ For each resource, include the full reference followed by the
annotation.
○ Explain the focus of the research or review article you chose.
○ Provide a summary overview of the publication.
■ According to this source, what is the impact of this
technology on patient safety and quality of care?
■ According to this source, what is the relevance of
this technology to nursing practice and the work of
the interdisciplinary health care team?
■ Why did you select this publication to write about
out of the many possible options? In other words,
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080?wrap=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1)
[https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36690/files/6477080/download?download_frd=1)
make the case as to why this resource is important
for health care practitioners to read.
● Summary of Recommendation
○ How would you tie together the key learnings from each of the
four publications you examined?
○ What organizational factors influence the selection of a
technology in a health care setting? Consider such factors as
organizational policies, resources, culture/social norms,
commitment, training programs, and/or employee
empowerment.
○ How would you justify the implementation and use of the
technology in a health care setting? This is the section where
you will justify (prove) that the implementation of the
patient care technology is appropriate or not. The evidence
should be cited from the literature that was noted in the
annotated bibliography.
■ Consider the impact of the technology on the
health care organization, patient care/satisfaction,
and interdisciplinary team productivity, satisfaction,
and retention.
● Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that
detract from the overall message.
● Length: 4–6-typed, double-spaced pages.
● Number of resources: Cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed publications, not
websites.
● Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
● APA: Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic entries.
Refer to Evidence and APA as needed.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
● Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired
outcomes.
○ Analyze current evidence on the impact of a selected patient
care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the
interdisciplinary team.
○ Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected
patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and
the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation.
[https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=1540](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=1540)
● Competency 4: Recommend the use of a technology to enhance quality
and safety standards for patients.
○ Describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a
technology in the health care setting.
○ Justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in
a health care setting.
● Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate
use of health information and patient care technologies.
○ Create a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated
bibliography that is generally free from errors in grammar,
punctuation, and spelling.
○ Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic
entries
**Evidence-BasedProposalandAnnotatedBibonTechinNursingPDF.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evidence-basedproposalandannotatedbibontechinnursingpdf-png)
**examplar2.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/examplar2-pdf)
TOPIC : URINARY TRAC INFECTION PLEASE SEE BOTH DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR RUBRIC AND INSTRUCTIONS DUE DATE JANUARY 27, 2025 5 PAGES NO PLAGIARISM MORE THAN 10 % ALLOWED WILL BE SUBMIT BY TURNIN IN SCHOLARLY REFERENCES NO OLDER THAN 5 YEARS CITATIONS REQUESTED A CONCLUSION SECTION REQUESTED – [\ \ Sign…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →TOPIC : URINARY TRAC INFECTION
PLEASE SEE BOTH DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR RUBRIC AND INSTRUCTIONS
DUE DATE JANUARY 27, 2025
5 PAGES
NO PLAGIARISM MORE THAN 10 % ALLOWED WILL BE SUBMIT BY TURNIN IN
SCHOLARLY REFERENCES NO OLDER THAN 5 YEARS
CITATIONS REQUESTED
A CONCLUSION SECTION REQUESTED
– [\
\
SignAssignmentInstructions.docx.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/signassignmentinstructions-docx-pdf "SignAssignmentInstructions.docx.pdf")
– [\
\
ResearchBasedPaperGradingRubric.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchbasedpapergradingrubric-pdf-10166329 "ResearchBasedPaperGradingRubric.pdf")
– 2 years ago
**Directions:** Read over the SOAP note and formulate a primary diagnosis. Based on the diagnosis complete the SOAP note with the details that would be expected for the diagnosis. Use UptoDate and/or Dyna MedPlus to find out what is expected from the history and physical, diagnostic workup and manag…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →**Directions:** Read over the SOAP note and formulate a primary diagnosis. Based on the diagnosis complete the SOAP note with the details that would be expected for the diagnosis. Use UptoDate and/or Dyna MedPlus to find out what is expected from the history and physical, diagnostic workup and management for the diagnosis. Include other peer review resources and and journal articles to support the development of your SOAP note. Complete and attach the evaluation & management score sheet to show how you coded the note for billing in each section.
– Upload a copy of your completed SOAP note.
– Upload a copy of the evaluation & management score sheet.
**Case Study:** A 47-year-old African-American man presents to your office for a follow-up visit. He was seen 3 weeks ago for an upper respiratory infection and noted incidentally to have a blood pressure of 164/98 mm Hg. He vaguely remembered being told in the past that his blood pressure was “borderline.” He feels fine, has no complaints, and his review of systems is entirely negative. He does not smoke cigarettes, drinks “a couple of beers on the weekends,” and does not exercise regularly. He has a sedentary job. His father died of a stroke at the age of 69. His mother is alive and in good health at the age of 72. He has two siblings and is not aware of any chronic medical issues that they have. In the office today, his blood pressure is 156/96 mm Hg in his left arm and 152/98 mm Hg in the right arm. He is afebrile, his pulse is 78 beats/min, respiratory rate 14 breaths/min, he is 70-in tall, and weighs 210 lb. A general physical examination is normal.
– [\
\
GroupSOAPRubricandTemplate.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/groupsoaprubricandtemplate-docx "GroupSOAPRubricandTemplate.docx")
– [\
\
EvaluationandManagementEMScoreSheet8985-2-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evaluationandmanagementemscoresheet8985-2-1-pdf-10166551 "EvaluationandManagementEMScoreSheet8985-2-1.pdf")
– [\
\
ComprehensiveSOAPNoteExample.doc2.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/comprehensivesoapnoteexample-doc2-pdf "ComprehensiveSOAPNoteExample.doc2.pdf")
– 2 years ago