Tag: Nursing

  • [Solved] 6026 assessment 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## 6026_GuidingQuestions_assessment3.docx – ## 6026_assessment3.docx **## 6026_GuidingQuestions_assessment3.docx** **Guiding Questions** **Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy** This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## 6026_GuidingQuestions_assessment3.docx

    – ## 6026_assessment3.docx

    **## 6026_GuidingQuestions_assessment3.docx**

    **Guiding Questions**
    **Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy**

    This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a pre-writing exercise or as a final check to ensure that you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment.
    **Do not** turn in this document as your assessment submission.

    **Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.**

    · Based on the data that you used to identify your chosen issue in Assessment 1, what is the current state of the quality of care and outcomes?

    · To what degree does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes need to be improved?

    · How does the current performance compare to any relevant benchmarks?

    · How does the current performance adversely impact the health of the target population

    negatively impacted by health inequity?

    **Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.**

    • How does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population negatively impacted by health inequity illustrate the need for improvements?

    o Whydoyouconsiderpolicydevelopmentandadvocacynecessary?

    o Howwilldevelopingahealthpolicyhelptoimprovethequalityofcareandoutcomes related to your chosen issue and target population negatively impacted by health inequity?

    o Whyisadvocatingforhealthpolicydevelopmentnecessarytodriveimprovements?
    **Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes**

    **for a specific issue in a target population.**

    • Why will your proposed policy (from Assessment 2) be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population?

    o Howwillyourproposedpolicyhelpdriveimprovements?

    What evidence or best-practices supports this? How does the evidence provide support?

    ![page1image59695744](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    1

    ![page2image59281728](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    **Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.**

    • Why is it important that policy development focused on your chosen issue and target population take place in care environments and settings beyond that for which you proposed the policy?

    o Howwillwiderdevelopmentofpolicieshelptodriveimprovementsrelatedtoyour chosen issue and target population?

    o Ideally,whatistheendresultofwiderpolicydevelopmentandimplementation?

    **Analyze the ways in which an interdisciplinary team strategizes to develop a policy that supports efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.**

    • What are the relevant interdisciplinary aspects of your policy?
    o Howwilltheseinterdisciplinaryaspectssupportefficientachievementofyourdesired

    outcomes for your target population?

    o Howwilltheseinterdisciplinaryaspectssupporteffectiveachievementofyour desired outcomes for your target population?

    **Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.**

    · Is your writing clear and professional?

    · Is your writing free from errors?

    · Is your writing persuasive?

    · Does your submission conform to the format and length requirements of your chosen journal?

    **Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references.**

    · Did you use 3–5 sources (or the number required by your chosen journal) in your assessment?

    o Arethesourcesyouusednomorethanfiveyearsold?

    · Are your sources cited in APA format (or the journal’s preferred style) throughout your

    letter?

    · Have you included an attached reference list?

    · Did you follow the formatting guidelines of your chosen journal?

    o Didyouattachthesubmissionandformattingguidelinesforyourchosenjournalat the end of your assessment submission as an appendix?

    ![page2image59760128](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    2

    **image1.png**

    **## 6026_assessment3.docx**

    Write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal. The length and format of the letter is dictated by your choice of journal.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    **Note**: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

    Advocating for new policies is an important aspect of the master’s-prepared nurse. For new policies to be compelling, they need to be supported by evidence. Supporting data can be used to illustrate why new policies and interventions are needed to help address a specific health issue. Compelling data can help sway the stakeholders and gain support for your policy.

    Another aspect of advocacy is disseminating new policies and interventions outside of the immediate care environment. This can be done by reaching out to professional organizations as well as academic and professional journals. A letter to the editor is one strategy for disseminating information to a wider audience and to potentially enlist support throughout the wider professional community.

    **Professional Context**

    Nurses have the opportunity to use their skills and develop programs to keep individuals and communities healthy. Health is complex, however, and the nurse needs to possess strong advocacy skills to successfully support a cause or interest. The American Nurses Association's (2015) code of ethics describes the responsibility of a nurse to include working through and with appropriate stakeholders to advocate for the health of people in and out of the work environment. To be an effective advocate, there are several important abilities a nurse must possess, including problem-solving, communication, and influencing others. One way a nurse can advocate to a broader population is through effective letter writing, both to legislators and through the media, such as with editorials and research articles.

    **Scenario**

    Throughout this course, you have focused on a specific health issue occurring within a specific population negatively impacted by health inequity. You researched position papers regarding this health concern, and you developed a health policy proposal to positively impact the health of the affected individuals. It is now time to reach a greater audience regarding your policy proposal.

    You are going to write a letter to the editor of a peer-reviewed nursing journal. Use the
    [Nursing Master's Program (MSN) Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/MSN) to select a journal, and go to the journal’s website to find out the requirements for submitting an editorial, such as format requirements, topics, and word counts. Make sure you select a nursing journal that covers the topic about which you are going to write. If you want to use another journal that is not on this list, please make sure the journal does address healthcare, because this is the purpose of the assessment.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you will write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal in response to an article in that selected journal. Your goal is to be informative about the policy that you developed for your previous Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal assessment, while also being persuasive about the need for and benefit of similar policies in other healthcare settings. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy Scoring Guide and
    [Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/46877/files/8762354/download) to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

    · Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.

    · Look back to the data or scenario you used in your previous assessment to address this criterion.

    · Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

    · Justify why the developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

    · Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

    · Analyze the ways in which an interdisciplinary team strategizes to develop a policy that supports efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.

    · Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

    · Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style (or the journal's preferred style).

    Be sure the article you choose to respond to is relatively current, meaning published within the last five years.

    **Example assessment:** You may use the
    [Assessment 3 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/46877/files/8762349/download) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

    **Submission Requirements**

    The submission requirements for your editorial will depend on the journal you choose. To find out the requirements, go to the journal's Web site. There should be a section regarding submissions that will address how to format letters to the editor, and whether there is a word count limit (there usually is a limit).

    · If the journal does not have submission guidelines for the number of resources required, use 3–5 sources.

    · To be sure that your faculty knows the submission and formatting requirements for your letter, include the journal's guidelines on a separate page at the end of the document you submit for this assessment.

    · Be sure that the article your respond to has been published within the last five years.

    **Reference**

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements._ http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/CodeofEthicsforNurses/Code-of-Ethics-For-Nurses.html

    **## 6026_assessment3.docx**

    Write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal. The length and format of the letter is dictated by your choice of journal.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    **Note**: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

    Advocating for new policies is an important aspect of the master’s-prepared nurse. For new policies to be compelling, they need to be supported by evidence. Supporting data can be used to illustrate why new policies and interventions are needed to help address a specific health issue. Compelling data can help sway the stakeholders and gain support for your policy.

    Another aspect of advocacy is disseminating new policies and interventions outside of the immediate care environment. This can be done by reaching out to professional organizations as well as academic and professional journals. A letter to the editor is one strategy for disseminating information to a wider audience and to potentially enlist support throughout the wider professional community.

    **Professional Context**

    Nurses have the opportunity to use their skills and develop programs to keep individuals and communities healthy. Health is complex, however, and the nurse needs to possess strong advocacy skills to successfully support a cause or interest. The American Nurses Association's (2015) code of ethics describes the responsibility of a nurse to include working through and with appropriate stakeholders to advocate for the health of people in and out of the work environment. To be an effective advocate, there are several important abilities a nurse must possess, including problem-solving, communication, and influencing others. One way a nurse can advocate to a broader population is through effective letter writing, both to legislators and through the media, such as with editorials and research articles.

    **Scenario**

    Throughout this course, you have focused on a specific health issue occurring within a specific population negatively impacted by health inequity. You researched position papers regarding this health concern, and you developed a health policy proposal to positively impact the health of the affected individuals. It is now time to reach a greater audience regarding your policy proposal.

    You are going to write a letter to the editor of a peer-reviewed nursing journal. Use the
    [Nursing Master's Program (MSN) Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/MSN) to select a journal, and go to the journal’s website to find out the requirements for submitting an editorial, such as format requirements, topics, and word counts. Make sure you select a nursing journal that covers the topic about which you are going to write. If you want to use another journal that is not on this list, please make sure the journal does address healthcare, because this is the purpose of the assessment.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you will write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal in response to an article in that selected journal. Your goal is to be informative about the policy that you developed for your previous Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal assessment, while also being persuasive about the need for and benefit of similar policies in other healthcare settings. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy Scoring Guide and
    [Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/46877/files/8762354/download) to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

    · Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.

    · Look back to the data or scenario you used in your previous assessment to address this criterion.

    · Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

    · Justify why the developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

    · Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

    · Analyze the ways in which an interdisciplinary team strategizes to develop a policy that supports efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.

    · Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

    · Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style (or the journal's preferred style).

    Be sure the article you choose to respond to is relatively current, meaning published within the last five years.

    **Example assessment:** You may use the
    [Assessment 3 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/46877/files/8762349/download) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

    **Submission Requirements**

    The submission requirements for your editorial will depend on the journal you choose. To find out the requirements, go to the journal's Web site. There should be a section regarding submissions that will address how to format letters to the editor, and whether there is a word count limit (there usually is a limit).

    · If the journal does not have submission guidelines for the number of resources required, use 3–5 sources.

    · To be sure that your faculty knows the submission and formatting requirements for your letter, include the journal's guidelines on a separate page at the end of the document you submit for this assessment.

    · Be sure that the article your respond to has been published within the last five years.

    **Reference**

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements._ http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/CodeofEthicsforNurses/Code-of-Ethics-For-Nurses.html

    **## 6026_GuidingQuestions_assessment3.docx**

    **Guiding Questions**
    **Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy**

    This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a pre-writing exercise or as a final check to ensure that you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment.
    **Do not** turn in this document as your assessment submission.

    **Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.**

    · Based on the data that you used to identify your chosen issue in Assessment 1, what is the current state of the quality of care and outcomes?

    · To what degree does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes need to be improved?

    · How does the current performance compare to any relevant benchmarks?

    · How does the current performance adversely impact the health of the target population

    negatively impacted by health inequity?

    **Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.**

    • How does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population negatively impacted by health inequity illustrate the need for improvements?

    o Whydoyouconsiderpolicydevelopmentandadvocacynecessary?

    o Howwilldevelopingahealthpolicyhelptoimprovethequalityofcareandoutcomes related to your chosen issue and target population negatively impacted by health inequity?

    o Whyisadvocatingforhealthpolicydevelopmentnecessarytodriveimprovements?
    **Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes**

    **for a specific issue in a target population.**

    • Why will your proposed policy (from Assessment 2) be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population?

    o Howwillyourproposedpolicyhelpdriveimprovements?

    What evidence or best-practices supports this? How does the evidence provide support?

    ![page1image59695744](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    1

    ![page2image59281728](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    **Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.**

    • Why is it important that policy development focused on your chosen issue and target population take place in care environments and settings beyond that for which you proposed the policy?

    o Howwillwiderdevelopmentofpolicieshelptodriveimprovementsrelatedtoyour chosen issue and target population?

    o Ideally,whatistheendresultofwiderpolicydevelopmentandimplementation?

    **Analyze the ways in which an interdisciplinary team strategizes to develop a policy that supports efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.**

    • What are the relevant interdisciplinary aspects of your policy?
    o Howwilltheseinterdisciplinaryaspectssupportefficientachievementofyourdesired

    outcomes for your target population?

    o Howwilltheseinterdisciplinaryaspectssupporteffectiveachievementofyour desired outcomes for your target population?

    **Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.**

    · Is your writing clear and professional?

    · Is your writing free from errors?

    · Is your writing persuasive?

    · Does your submission conform to the format and length requirements of your chosen journal?

    **Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references.**

    · Did you use 3–5 sources (or the number required by your chosen journal) in your assessment?

    o Arethesourcesyouusednomorethanfiveyearsold?

    · Are your sources cited in APA format (or the journal’s preferred style) throughout your

    letter?

    · Have you included an attached reference list?

    · Did you follow the formatting guidelines of your chosen journal?

    o Didyouattachthesubmissionandformattingguidelinesforyourchosenjournalat the end of your assessment submission as an appendix?

    ![page2image59760128](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    2

    **image1.png**

    **## 6026_assessment3.docx**

    Write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal. The length and format of the letter is dictated by your choice of journal.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    **Note**: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

    Advocating for new policies is an important aspect of the master’s-prepared nurse. For new policies to be compelling, they need to be supported by evidence. Supporting data can be used to illustrate why new policies and interventions are needed to help address a specific health issue. Compelling data can help sway the stakeholders and gain support for your policy.

    Another aspect of advocacy is disseminating new policies and interventions outside of the immediate care environment. This can be done by reaching out to professional organizations as well as academic and professional journals. A letter to the editor is one strategy for disseminating information to a wider audience and to potentially enlist support throughout the wider professional community.

    **Professional Context**

    Nurses have the opportunity to use their skills and develop programs to keep individuals and communities healthy. Health is complex, however, and the nurse needs to possess strong advocacy skills to successfully support a cause or interest. The American Nurses Association's (2015) code of ethics describes the responsibility of a nurse to include working through and with appropriate stakeholders to advocate for the health of people in and out of the work environment. To be an effective advocate, there are several important abilities a nurse must possess, including problem-solving, communication, and influencing others. One way a nurse can advocate to a broader population is through effective letter writing, both to legislators and through the media, such as with editorials and research articles.

    **Scenario**

    Throughout this course, you have focused on a specific health issue occurring within a specific population negatively impacted by health inequity. You researched position papers regarding this health concern, and you developed a health policy proposal to positively impact the health of the affected individuals. It is now time to reach a greater audience regarding your policy proposal.

    You are going to write a letter to the editor of a peer-reviewed nursing journal. Use the
    [Nursing Master's Program (MSN) Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/MSN) to select a journal, and go to the journal’s website to find out the requirements for submitting an editorial, such as format requirements, topics, and word counts. Make sure you select a nursing journal that covers the topic about which you are going to write. If you want to use another journal that is not on this list, please make sure the journal does address healthcare, because this is the purpose of the assessment.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you will write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal in response to an article in that selected journal. Your goal is to be informative about the policy that you developed for your previous Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal assessment, while also being persuasive about the need for and benefit of similar policies in other healthcare settings. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy Scoring Guide and
    [Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/46877/files/8762354/download) to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

    · Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.

    · Look back to the data or scenario you used in your previous assessment to address this criterion.

    · Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

    · Justify why the developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

    · Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

    · Analyze the ways in which an interdisciplinary team strategizes to develop a policy that supports efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.

    · Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

    · Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style (or the journal's preferred style).

    Be sure the article you choose to respond to is relatively current, meaning published within the last five years.

    **Example assessment:** You may use the
    [Assessment 3 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/46877/files/8762349/download) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

    **Submission Requirements**

    The submission requirements for your editorial will depend on the journal you choose. To find out the requirements, go to the journal's Web site. There should be a section regarding submissions that will address how to format letters to the editor, and whether there is a word count limit (there usually is a limit).

    · If the journal does not have submission guidelines for the number of resources required, use 3–5 sources.

    · To be sure that your faculty knows the submission and formatting requirements for your letter, include the journal's guidelines on a separate page at the end of the document you submit for this assessment.

    · Be sure that the article your respond to has been published within the last five years.

    **Reference**

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements._ http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/CodeofEthicsforNurses/Code-of-Ethics-For-Nurses.html

    **## 6026_GuidingQuestions_assessment3.docx**

    **Guiding Questions**
    **Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy**

    This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a pre-writing exercise or as a final check to ensure that you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment.
    **Do not** turn in this document as your assessment submission.

    **Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.**

    · Based on the data that you used to identify your chosen issue in Assessment 1, what is the current state of the quality of care and outcomes?

    · To what degree does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes need to be improved?

    · How does the current performance compare to any relevant benchmarks?

    · How does the current performance adversely impact the health of the target population

    negatively impacted by health inequity?

    **Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.**

    • How does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population negatively impacted by health inequity illustrate the need for improvements?

    o Whydoyouconsiderpolicydevelopmentandadvocacynecessary?

    o Howwilldevelopingahealthpolicyhelptoimprovethequalityofcareandoutcomes related to your chosen issue and target population negatively impacted by health inequity?

    o Whyisadvocatingforhealthpolicydevelopmentnecessarytodriveimprovements?
    **Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes**

    **for a specific issue in a target population.**

    • Why will your proposed policy (from Assessment 2) be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population?

    o Howwillyourproposedpolicyhelpdriveimprovements?

    What evidence or best-practices supports this? How does the evidence provide support?

    ![page1image59695744](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    1

    ![page2image59281728](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    **Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.**

    • Why is it important that policy development focused on your chosen issue and target population take place in care environments and settings beyond that for which you proposed the policy?

    o Howwillwiderdevelopmentofpolicieshelptodriveimprovementsrelatedtoyour chosen issue and target population?

    o Ideally,whatistheendresultofwiderpolicydevelopmentandimplementation?

    **Analyze the ways in which an interdisciplinary team strategizes to develop a policy that supports efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.**

    • What are the relevant interdisciplinary aspects of your policy?
    o Howwilltheseinterdisciplinaryaspectssupportefficientachievementofyourdesired

    outcomes for your target population?

    o Howwilltheseinterdisciplinaryaspectssupporteffectiveachievementofyour desired outcomes for your target population?

    **Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.**

    · Is your writing clear and professional?

    · Is your writing free from errors?

    · Is your writing persuasive?

    · Does your submission conform to the format and length requirements of your chosen journal?

    **Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references.**

    · Did you use 3–5 sources (or the number required by your chosen journal) in your assessment?

    o Arethesourcesyouusednomorethanfiveyearsold?

    · Are your sources cited in APA format (or the journal’s preferred style) throughout your

    letter?

    · Have you included an attached reference list?

    · Did you follow the formatting guidelines of your chosen journal?

    o Didyouattachthesubmissionandformattingguidelinesforyourchosenjournalat the end of your assessment submission as an appendix?

    ![page2image59760128](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/6026-assessment-3)

    2

    **image1.png**

    **## 6026_assessment3.docx**

    Write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal. The length and format of the letter is dictated by your choice of journal.

    Collapse All

    **Introduction**

    **Note**: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

    Advocating for new policies is an important aspect of the master’s-prepared nurse. For new policies to be compelling, they need to be supported by evidence. Supporting data can be used to illustrate why new policies and interventions are needed to help address a specific health issue. Compelling data can help sway the stakeholders and gain support for your policy.

    Another aspect of advocacy is disseminating new policies and interventions outside of the immediate care environment. This can be done by reaching out to professional organizations as well as academic and professional journals. A letter to the editor is one strategy for disseminating information to a wider audience and to potentially enlist support throughout the wider professional community.

    **Professional Context**

    Nurses have the opportunity to use their skills and develop programs to keep individuals and communities healthy. Health is complex, however, and the nurse needs to possess strong advocacy skills to successfully support a cause or interest. The American Nurses Association's (2015) code of ethics describes the responsibility of a nurse to include working through and with appropriate stakeholders to advocate for the health of people in and out of the work environment. To be an effective advocate, there are several important abilities a nurse must possess, including problem-solving, communication, and influencing others. One way a nurse can advocate to a broader population is through effective letter writing, both to legislators and through the media, such as with editorials and research articles.

    **Scenario**

    Throughout this course, you have focused on a specific health issue occurring within a specific population negatively impacted by health inequity. You researched position papers regarding this health concern, and you developed a health policy proposal to positively impact the health of the affected individuals. It is now time to reach a greater audience regarding your policy proposal.

    You are going to write a letter to the editor of a peer-reviewed nursing journal. Use the
    [Nursing Master's Program (MSN) Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/MSN) to select a journal, and go to the journal’s website to find out the requirements for submitting an editorial, such as format requirements, topics, and word counts. Make sure you select a nursing journal that covers the topic about which you are going to write. If you want to use another journal that is not on this list, please make sure the journal does address healthcare, because this is the purpose of the assessment.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you will write a letter to the editor of a scholarly journal in response to an article in that selected journal. Your goal is to be informative about the policy that you developed for your previous Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal assessment, while also being persuasive about the need for and benefit of similar policies in other healthcare settings. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy Scoring Guide and
    [Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/46877/files/8762354/download) to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

    · Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.

    · Look back to the data or scenario you used in your previous assessment to address this criterion.

    · Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

    · Justify why the developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

    · Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

    · Analyze the ways in which an interdisciplinary team strategizes to develop a policy that supports efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.

    · Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

    · Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style (or the journal's preferred style).

    Be sure the article you choose to respond to is relatively current, meaning published within the last five years.

    **Example assessment:** You may use the
    [Assessment 3 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/46877/files/8762349/download) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

    **Submission Requirements**

    The submission requirements for your editorial will depend on the journal you choose. To find out the requirements, go to the journal's Web site. There should be a section regarding submissions that will address how to format letters to the editor, and whether there is a word count limit (there usually is a limit).

    · If the journal does not have submission guidelines for the number of resources required, use 3–5 sources.

    · To be sure that your faculty knows the submission and formatting requirements for your letter, include the journal's guidelines on a separate page at the end of the document you submit for this assessment.

    · Be sure that the article your respond to has been published within the last five years.

    **Reference**

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements._ http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/CodeofEthicsforNurses/Code-of-Ethics-For-Nurses.html

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] wendy lewis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering wendy lewis.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Use Technical Communication: A Reader-Centered Approach, 9th Edition to answer the question. The pdf of the book is attached

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Use theUse hethe attatched book to answer questions in chapter 5.5 6 \ COVERPAGE2.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/coverpage2-jpg "COVERPAGE2.jpg") **Technical Communication: A Reader-Centered Approach, 9th Edition .Chapter 6 Organizing Reader-Centered Communications** NOT RATED Purchase the a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Use theUse hethe attatched book to answer questions in chapter 5.5
    6
    \
    COVERPAGE2.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/coverpage2-jpg "COVERPAGE2.jpg")
    **Technical Communication: A Reader-Centered Approach, 9th Edition .Chapter 6 Organizing Reader-Centered Communications**
    NOT RATED
    Purchase the answer to view it
    ![blurred-text](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/blurred-text.c4cde9f021be0abed13ca77c3d6d43d3.png)
    TechnicalCommunicationAReader-CenteredApproach9thEditionPaulV.Anderson.pdf
    ![homework question](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/loader.e99f1ef323fecd089c1cdcaaadcd1f9b.gif)
    plagiarism checkPurchase $20
    01. [Applied Sciences](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/applied-sciences)
    02. [Architecture and Design](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/architecture-and-design)
    03. [Biology](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology)
    04. [Business & Finance](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance)
    05. [Chemistry](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/chemistry)
    06. [Computer Science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science)
    07. [Geography](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/earth-science-geography)
    08. [Geology](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/earth-science-geology)
    09. [Education](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/education)
    10. [Engineering](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/engineering)
    11. [English](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/english)
    12. [Environmental science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/environmental-science)
    13. [Spanish](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/foreign-languages-spanish)
    14. [Government](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/government)
    15. [History](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/history)
    16. [Human Resource Management](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/human-resource-management)
    17. [Information Systems](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/information-systems)
    18. [Law](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law)
    19. [Literature](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/literature)
    20. [Mathematics](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/mathematics)
    21. [Nursing](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/nursing)
    22. [Physics](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/physics)
    23. [Political Science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/political-science)
    24. [Psychology](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/psychology)
    25. [Reading](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/reading)
    26. [Science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/science)
    27. [Social Science](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science)
    28. [Liberty University](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/liberty-university)
    29. [New Hampshire University](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/southern-new-hampshire-university)
    30. [Strayer University](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/strayer-university)
    31. [University Of Phoenix](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/university-of-phoenix)
    32. [Walden University](https://www.sweetstudy.com/note-bank/walden-university)
    – [Home](https://www.sweetstudy.com/)
    – [Homework Answers](https://www.sweetstudy.com/homework-answers)
    – [Archive](https://www.sweetstudy.com/archive)
    – [Tags](https://www.sweetstudy.com/tag-cloud)
    – [Reviews](https://www.sweetstudy.com/reviews-page)
    – [Contact](https://www.sweetstudy.com/contact-us)

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ 20250923_071234.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250923-071234-jpg "20250923_071234.jpg") \ 20250923_071249.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250923-071249-jpg "20250923_071249.jpg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    20250923_071234.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250923-071234-jpg "20250923_071234.jpg")
    \
    20250923_071249.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/20250923-071249-jpg "20250923_071249.jpg")

  • [Solved] Nursing slides assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    help – ## assignmentgore.docx **## assignmentgore.docx** · Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. · Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT qu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    help

    – ## assignmentgore.docx

    **## assignmentgore.docx**

    · Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

    · Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.

    · Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.

    · Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

    **The Assignment** (Evidence-Based Project)

    _Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews_

    Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

    · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

    · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

    · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    · Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

    · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 7 of Week 5

    **## assignmentgore.docx**

    · Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

    · Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.

    · Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.

    · Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

    **The Assignment** (Evidence-Based Project)

    _Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews_

    Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

    · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

    · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

    · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

    · Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

    · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

    By Day 7 of Week 5

  • [Solved] Ethical dilemma

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I wrote a discussion about ethical dilemma in my discussion but need help rephrasing it Describe a situation of ethical dilemma that you have experienced in practice and how it was resolved. Post has to have 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with at least 2 academic sources. One of…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I wrote a discussion about ethical dilemma in my discussion but need help rephrasing it
    Describe a situation of ethical dilemma that you have experienced in practice and how it was resolved. Post has to have 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with at least 2 academic sources. One of them can be used from the textbook: Hamric, B. A., Hanson, M. C., & Tracy, F. M., & O’Grady, T. E. (2013). Advanced Practice Nursing: An Integrative Approach (5th ed.). Saunders. ISBN: 9781455739806
    Need it to be emphasized more and no similarity score, no AI
    One of the ethical dilemmas I have experienced is **Inadequate Staffing**:
    When the hospital is understaffed, us nurses must balance the needs of a higher patient-to-nurse ratio with the responsibility of ensuring patient safety.
    \
    Module5discuss.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module5discuss-docx "Module5discuss.docx")

  • [Solved] LOU CASE STUDY

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS- NEED BE ORIGINAL WORK REVIEW CAREFULLY THE case study ATTACHED and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. The answers must be in your OWN WORDS, MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK, with reference to the journal or book where you…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS- NEED BE ORIGINAL WORK
    REVIEW CAREFULLY THE case study ATTACHED and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references.
    The answers must be in your OWN WORDS, MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK, with reference to the journal or book where you found the evidence to your answer.DO-NOT COPY PASTE or use a past students work as all files submitted in this course are registered and saved in turn it in program.
    Turn it in Score must be less than 10 % or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated.
    All answers to case studies must-have reference cited in the text for each answer and a minimum of 2 Scholarly References (Journals, books) (NO WEBSITES) .
    2 PAGES
    APA 7TH EDITION FORMAT
    CHECK YOUR GRAMMAR AND SPELLING
    NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM
    REFERENCES MUST BE ACCORDING PROFESSOR REQUEST SCHOLARLY REFERENCES WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS
    DUE DATE 9/24/2025
    \
    PHOTO-2025-09-17-08-57-03.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/photo-2025-09-17-08-57-03-jpg-10407269 "PHOTO-2025-09-17-08-57-03.jpg")

  • [Solved] Ethical Issues Hw

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Instructions: 1. Look up the word "Monologue" to obtain a clear definition and description of the word. 2. Read the articles and visit the website regarding standards and ethics 3. Then write a monologue that relates to an ethical issue. 4. Select one of the following topics – Artifici…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Instructions:
    1. Look up the word "Monologue" to obtain a clear definition and description of the word.
    2. Read the articles and visit the website regarding standards and ethics
    3. Then write a monologue that relates to an ethical issue.
    4. Select one of the following topics
    – Artificial Intelligence in nursing
    – Ethical issues in research
    – Genetics in Nursing
    – Horizontal fashion incivility and vertical incivility
    – Incivility in the profession – Example: Expert RN towards Novice Nurses
    – Violence – Example: "bullying"
    Your homework should also be:
    five pages (including the cover page and the reference page)
    – typed according to APA style for margins, formatting and spacing standards
    – Word document
    Use the attached pdfs to help you do the homework, and also the following link:
    https://codeofethics.ana.org/home
    \
    Article_An_integrated_ethical_decision-making_model.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article-an-integrated-ethical-decision-making-model-pdf-10407287 "Article_An_integrated_ethical_decision-making_model.pdf")
    \
    Article_Nurses_experiences_of_ethical_dilemmas.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article-nurses-experiences-of-ethical-dilemmas-pdf-10407289 "Article_Nurses_experiences_of_ethical_dilemmas.pdf")

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Step3EBPProjectEvaluation1.docx – ## EvidenceBasedPracticePrepAssignment.docx – Step2EvidenceBasedPracticeProject.docx **## Step3EBPProjectEvaluation1.docx** **Step 3: EBP Project – Evaluation** (Outcome Assignment – must achieve minimum of 80%) **Evaluation of the Presentation:** _(Spirit of I…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Step3EBPProjectEvaluation1.docx

    – ## EvidenceBasedPracticePrepAssignment.docx

    – Step2EvidenceBasedPracticeProject.docx

    **## Step3EBPProjectEvaluation1.docx**

    **Step 3: EBP Project – Evaluation**

    (Outcome Assignment – must achieve minimum of 80%)

    **Evaluation of the Presentation:** _(Spirit of Inquiry & Professional Identity)_

    Upon completion of the presentation, the learner will collect, and review completed evaluation forms (these evaluation forms do NOT need to be submitted).

    **DON’T FORGET THIS PART! – YOU’RE NOT DONE YET! –** following the presentation
    **:**

    **Self-evaluation:** (Answer the following questions USING THIS TEMPLATE and submit it in the appropriate D2L assignment folder.)

    1. Discuss what you would change if you had the opportunity to do this assignment again.

    2. Review data from the peer evaluations submitted by those in attendance and submit a summary of your presentation strengths and weaknesses based on the evaluations.

    · Strengths:

    · Weaknesses:

    3. Conduct a self-evaluation of your skills as a presenter by reflecting on each evaluation criteria (refer to peer evaluation forms when reflecting on what the evaluation criteria are) and discussing strengths and opportunities for improvement.

    · Strengths:

    · Opportunities for improvement:

    **Instructor Evaluation:**

    Your clinical instructor will submit an evaluation of your presentation according to the presentation evaluation guidelines.  You will be evaluated on your skill as a presenter, your ability to meet the expectations of the presentation guidelines above, and the thoroughness and accuracy of your own self-evaluation.

    **## EvidenceBasedPracticePrepAssignment.docx**

    Step 1: Evidence Based Practice
    **Prep** Assignment

    · This will be due shortly after your first clinical week/weekend. See due date document for specifics.

    · You will need to answer and discuss each question below
    **ON THIS TEMPLATE** and submit it to the appropriate assignment folder in D2L. Your clinical faculty will then indicate paper topic approval or disapproval. This is a REQUIRED pass/fail assignment.

    · Purpose: To gain skills in research. To determine EBP paper topic and receive instructor feedback as to whether or not topic is reasonable and acceptable for formal EBP paper.

    Assignment Overview:

    1. Choose a nursing intervention commonly used in nursing practice.  Use your clinical time to identify an intervention that you have seen that may not be supported by current evidence or that is not consistently followed. A suggestion might be to explore interventions listed in Nurse’s Pocket Guide in Nursing Central. There is also a resource in D2L of some possible EBP topics.

    · Example: The issue of testing pH of gastric contents for confirmation of NG placement is well researched and the problems of auscultation for insufflation of air are well documented, yet the practice continues, why?  Is the practice based on research, if not, why does it continue?

    · You will be doing research to determine what literature says SHOULD be done and if it’s not being done, analyze why it is not being done.

    ·
    **List your topic here:**
    **The effectiveness of peer support in improving diabetes self-management**

    · Find and analyze one scholarly, research-based article that supports or challenges the use of this intervention and find and analyze one scholarly, research-based article that identifies a new evidence-based intervention to address the issue. (Minimum of 2 articles total)

    Article #1:

    Article #2:

    2. What key words did you use in the search bar?

    3. How many results came up during your initial search?

    4. How did you change/refine your initial search to get the information you needed?

    5. Is your topic too narrow or too broad? How will you expand or limit your scope in order to complete the requirements of the paper?

    6. Obtain approval of topic by instructor via D2L
    _PRIOR_ to beginning project.

    7. If the topic is not approved, work with instructor to refine and approve topic to begin paper.

    **Step2EvidenceBasedPracticeProject.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/step2evidencebasedpracticeproject-docx-10407311)

    **Step2EvidenceBasedPracticeProject.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/step2evidencebasedpracticeproject-docx-10407311)

    **## Step3EBPProjectEvaluation1.docx**

    **Step 3: EBP Project – Evaluation**

    (Outcome Assignment – must achieve minimum of 80%)

    **Evaluation of the Presentation:** _(Spirit of Inquiry & Professional Identity)_

    Upon completion of the presentation, the learner will collect, and review completed evaluation forms (these evaluation forms do NOT need to be submitted).

    **DON’T FORGET THIS PART! – YOU’RE NOT DONE YET! –** following the presentation
    **:**

    **Self-evaluation:** (Answer the following questions USING THIS TEMPLATE and submit it in the appropriate D2L assignment folder.)

    1. Discuss what you would change if you had the opportunity to do this assignment again.

    2. Review data from the peer evaluations submitted by those in attendance and submit a summary of your presentation strengths and weaknesses based on the evaluations.

    · Strengths:

    · Weaknesses:

    3. Conduct a self-evaluation of your skills as a presenter by reflecting on each evaluation criteria (refer to peer evaluation forms when reflecting on what the evaluation criteria are) and discussing strengths and opportunities for improvement.

    · Strengths:

    · Opportunities for improvement:

    **Instructor Evaluation:**

    Your clinical instructor will submit an evaluation of your presentation according to the presentation evaluation guidelines.  You will be evaluated on your skill as a presenter, your ability to meet the expectations of the presentation guidelines above, and the thoroughness and accuracy of your own self-evaluation.

    **## EvidenceBasedPracticePrepAssignment.docx**

    Step 1: Evidence Based Practice
    **Prep** Assignment

    · This will be due shortly after your first clinical week/weekend. See due date document for specifics.

    · You will need to answer and discuss each question below
    **ON THIS TEMPLATE** and submit it to the appropriate assignment folder in D2L. Your clinical faculty will then indicate paper topic approval or disapproval. This is a REQUIRED pass/fail assignment.

    · Purpose: To gain skills in research. To determine EBP paper topic and receive instructor feedback as to whether or not topic is reasonable and acceptable for formal EBP paper.

    Assignment Overview:

    1. Choose a nursing intervention commonly used in nursing practice.  Use your clinical time to identify an intervention that you have seen that may not be supported by current evidence or that is not consistently followed. A suggestion might be to explore interventions listed in Nurse’s Pocket Guide in Nursing Central. There is also a resource in D2L of some possible EBP topics.

    · Example: The issue of testing pH of gastric contents for confirmation of NG placement is well researched and the problems of auscultation for insufflation of air are well documented, yet the practice continues, why?  Is the practice based on research, if not, why does it continue?

    · You will be doing research to determine what literature says SHOULD be done and if it’s not being done, analyze why it is not being done.

    ·
    **List your topic here:**
    **The effectiveness of peer support in improving diabetes self-management**

    · Find and analyze one scholarly, research-based article that supports or challenges the use of this intervention and find and analyze one scholarly, research-based article that identifies a new evidence-based intervention to address the issue. (Minimum of 2 articles total)

    Article #1:

    Article #2:

    2. What key words did you use in the search bar?

    3. How many results came up during your initial search?

    4. How did you change/refine your initial search to get the information you needed?

    5. Is your topic too narrow or too broad? How will you expand or limit your scope in order to complete the requirements of the paper?

    6. Obtain approval of topic by instructor via D2L
    _PRIOR_ to beginning project.

    7. If the topic is not approved, work with instructor to refine and approve topic to begin paper.

    **Step2EvidenceBasedPracticeProject.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/step2evidencebasedpracticeproject-docx-10407311)

    **## Step3EBPProjectEvaluation1.docx**

    **Step 3: EBP Project – Evaluation**

    (Outcome Assignment – must achieve minimum of 80%)

    **Evaluation of the Presentation:** _(Spirit of Inquiry & Professional Identity)_

    Upon completion of the presentation, the learner will collect, and review completed evaluation forms (these evaluation forms do NOT need to be submitted).

    **DON’T FORGET THIS PART! – YOU’RE NOT DONE YET! –** following the presentation
    **:**

    **Self-evaluation:** (Answer the following questions USING THIS TEMPLATE and submit it in the appropriate D2L assignment folder.)

    1. Discuss what you would change if you had the opportunity to do this assignment again.

    2. Review data from the peer evaluations submitted by those in attendance and submit a summary of your presentation strengths and weaknesses based on the evaluations.

    · Strengths:

    · Weaknesses:

    3. Conduct a self-evaluation of your skills as a presenter by reflecting on each evaluation criteria (refer to peer evaluation forms when reflecting on what the evaluation criteria are) and discussing strengths and opportunities for improvement.

    · Strengths:

    · Opportunities for improvement:

    **Instructor Evaluation:**

    Your clinical instructor will submit an evaluation of your presentation according to the presentation evaluation guidelines.  You will be evaluated on your skill as a presenter, your ability to meet the expectations of the presentation guidelines above, and the thoroughness and accuracy of your own self-evaluation.

    **## EvidenceBasedPracticePrepAssignment.docx**

    Step 1: Evidence Based Practice
    **Prep** Assignment

    · This will be due shortly after your first clinical week/weekend. See due date document for specifics.

    · You will need to answer and discuss each question below
    **ON THIS TEMPLATE** and submit it to the appropriate assignment folder in D2L. Your clinical faculty will then indicate paper topic approval or disapproval. This is a REQUIRED pass/fail assignment.

    · Purpose: To gain skills in research. To determine EBP paper topic and receive instructor feedback as to whether or not topic is reasonable and acceptable for formal EBP paper.

    Assignment Overview:

    1. Choose a nursing intervention commonly used in nursing practice.  Use your clinical time to identify an intervention that you have seen that may not be supported by current evidence or that is not consistently followed. A suggestion might be to explore interventions listed in Nurse’s Pocket Guide in Nursing Central. There is also a resource in D2L of some possible EBP topics.

    · Example: The issue of testing pH of gastric contents for confirmation of NG placement is well researched and the problems of auscultation for insufflation of air are well documented, yet the practice continues, why?  Is the practice based on research, if not, why does it continue?

    · You will be doing research to determine what literature says SHOULD be done and if it’s not being done, analyze why it is not being done.

    ·
    **List your topic here:**
    **The effectiveness of peer support in improving diabetes self-management**

    · Find and analyze one scholarly, research-based article that supports or challenges the use of this intervention and find and analyze one scholarly, research-based article that identifies a new evidence-based intervention to address the issue. (Minimum of 2 articles total)

    Article #1:

    Article #2:

    2. What key words did you use in the search bar?

    3. How many results came up during your initial search?

    4. How did you change/refine your initial search to get the information you needed?

    5. Is your topic too narrow or too broad? How will you expand or limit your scope in order to complete the requirements of the paper?

    6. Obtain approval of topic by instructor via D2L
    _PRIOR_ to beginning project.

    7. If the topic is not approved, work with instructor to refine and approve topic to begin paper.

    **Step2EvidenceBasedPracticeProject.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/step2evidencebasedpracticeproject-docx-10407311)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3