Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] Applied Sciences Weeks 2-5 Assignments

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need help completing 4 assignments. One assignment due per week..

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need help completing 4 assignments. One assignment due per week..

  • [Solved] SCA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering SCA.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] WK 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## WK4.docx **## WK4.docx** **DQ1** **Review the peer-reviewed article below and attached and any other additional articles to make a total of 3 or 4** Teixeira, S. M. A., Ferré, G. C., da Cruz Sequeira, C. A., Santos, J. M., Guerra, M. M., & Lluch, M. T. (2025). Randomized Controlled Trial to Eva…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## WK4.docx

    **## WK4.docx**

    **DQ1**

    **Review the peer-reviewed article below and attached and any other additional articles to make a total of 3 or 4**

    Teixeira, S. M. A., Ferré, G. C., da Cruz Sequeira, C. A., Santos, J. M., Guerra, M. M., & Lluch, M. T. (2025). Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Positive Mental Health Program for Adults: Study Protocol.
    _Public Health Nursing_,
    _42_(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13427

    · Critically analyze the following aspects of the research study:

    · Purpose

    · Study population

    · Length of the trial

    · Data collection methods

    · Outcome measures

    · Results and conclusions

    · Ethical issues associated with the study

    · Ask yourself: How did this research study benefit from its experimental design? What was achieved by randomization that might not otherwise have been achieved?

    **Discussion 2 pages**

    · Summarize the research study addressing the aspects bulleted above.

    · Identify and discuss the ethical issues associated with this study.

    · Be sure to include a link to the article in your post.

    **Assignment 1**

    For this Assignment, you will identify an epidemiologic association of interest (select something on mental health) and determine an appropriate study design for exploring that association.

    · Consider an association between a risk factor and a particular health outcome that is of interest to you (choose something associated with mental health) or population health topic close to mental health.

    · Then, select an observational OR experimental study design you think would be the most appropriate for exploring this association. You may select from any of the designs covered in this module.

    In a 3pages paper, not including title page and references, address the following:

    · Briefly identify the population health topic (association between a risk factor and a health outcome) you selected. Present a research question based on this topic that you would like to answer in a proposed study. (Consult the Walden “Developing Research” resource for guidance on crafting a research question.)

    · Explain the epidemiologic study design that would be most appropriate to assess and address your population health problem.

    · Summarize the data collection activities you would use (i.e., how you would collect data—online survey, paper/pen, mailing, etc.).

    · Explain any specific methodologic strategies you would use. For example, if you were conducting a case-control study, how would you select your cases and controls?

    · Consider the methods you would use to make these selections. What are the strengths and limitations of your selected approach?

    · Explain ethical considerations pertaining to your study.

    References for assignment one, use additional references

    Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024). Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice (4th ed.). Springer.

    Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). Epidemiology for public health practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

    **Discussion 2 (2 pages)**

    · Describe the role and responsibilities of the project manager in a quality improvement project.

    · Reintroduce the quality improvement practice gap identified in Week 3 or introduce a new practice gap.

    · Include the baseline metrics or objective data to support this as a practice gap.

    · Through the lens of a project manager, develop one measurable objective to close the identified quality improvement gap.

    · Must be in SMART goal format:

    · Specific

    · Measurable

    · Achievable

    · Relevant

    · Timebound

    · Recommend at least one new or different project management approach or tool the project manager might use for this quality improvement project.

    · Explain why this project management tool or approach is appropriate for this project.

    · Describe the strengths and limitations of this project management activity.

    **Assignment 2**

    Reflect on tools for measuring quality in nursing practice.

    Use sample paper template for the Tools and Methods for Quality Improvement attached

    **The Assignment (3pages)**

    Analyze evidence from the literature and course materials, synthesize the information, and develop a 3- to 4-page scholarly response, applying the following criteria:

    · Identify a patient care quality or safety gap in your selected healthcare organization.

    · Describe the patient care delivery gap or problem in nursing practice.

    · Include metrics or objective data and supporting information to substantiate this gap in nursing practice.

    · Address the type of indicator, such as structural, process, or outcomes.

    · Indicate the type of quality indicator, such as rate-based, prevention, patient safety, or nursing sensitive indicator.

    · Describe whether this quality indicator is risk adjusted. Why or why not?

    · How did the selected organization establish their target or benchmark metrics for this quality indicator? Be specific.

    · Analyze the impact of not meeting this quality indicator to:

    · Health equity and diversity

    · Patient and staff engagement

    · Human and financial to patients, the organization, or the healthcare system

    · Analyze two (2) journal articles, clinical guidelines, or professional practice organization position statement that supports best practices related to the identified gap in nursing practice

    **References for Assignment 2**

    · American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2024).
    [_The essentialsLinks to an external site._](https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials). AACN. https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials

    · Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).
    _Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines_ (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

    · Chapter 8, “Translation” (pp. 189–203)

    · Zellefrow, C., Spalla-King, T. (2024)
    [Development of the PICOT Decision Tree: A tool to Support Student LearningLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/development-picot-decision-tree-tool-support/docview/3033891993/se-2?accountid=14872).
    _Journal of Nursing Education. 63_(4).

    ·
    **Document:** [Tools and Methods for Quality Improvement Paper Template (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/188092/files/15154676?wrap=1) [Download Tools and Methods for Quality Improvement Paper Template (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/188092/files/15154676/download?download_frd=1)

    · Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.).
    [_Quality improvement essentials toolkit_ Links to an external site.](https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/Quality-Improvement-Essentials-Toolkit.aspx) [Multimedia]. https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/Quality-Improvement-Essentials-Toolkit.aspx

    · Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.).
    [_RCA2: Improving root cause analyses and actions to prevent harm_ Links to an external site.](https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/RCA2-Improving-Root-Cause-Analyses-and-Actions-to-Prevent-Harm.aspx) [Multimedia]. https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/RCA2-Improving-Root-Cause-Analyses-and-Actions-to-Prevent-Harm.aspx

    **## WK4.docx**

    **DQ1**

    **Review the peer-reviewed article below and attached and any other additional articles to make a total of 3 or 4**

    Teixeira, S. M. A., Ferré, G. C., da Cruz Sequeira, C. A., Santos, J. M., Guerra, M. M., & Lluch, M. T. (2025). Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Positive Mental Health Program for Adults: Study Protocol.
    _Public Health Nursing_,
    _42_(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13427

    · Critically analyze the following aspects of the research study:

    · Purpose

    · Study population

    · Length of the trial

    · Data collection methods

    · Outcome measures

    · Results and conclusions

    · Ethical issues associated with the study

    · Ask yourself: How did this research study benefit from its experimental design? What was achieved by randomization that might not otherwise have been achieved?

    **Discussion 2 pages**

    · Summarize the research study addressing the aspects bulleted above.

    · Identify and discuss the ethical issues associated with this study.

    · Be sure to include a link to the article in your post.

    **Assignment 1**

    For this Assignment, you will identify an epidemiologic association of interest (select something on mental health) and determine an appropriate study design for exploring that association.

    · Consider an association between a risk factor and a particular health outcome that is of interest to you (choose something associated with mental health) or population health topic close to mental health.

    · Then, select an observational OR experimental study design you think would be the most appropriate for exploring this association. You may select from any of the designs covered in this module.

    In a 3pages paper, not including title page and references, address the following:

    · Briefly identify the population health topic (association between a risk factor and a health outcome) you selected. Present a research question based on this topic that you would like to answer in a proposed study. (Consult the Walden “Developing Research” resource for guidance on crafting a research question.)

    · Explain the epidemiologic study design that would be most appropriate to assess and address your population health problem.

    · Summarize the data collection activities you would use (i.e., how you would collect data—online survey, paper/pen, mailing, etc.).

    · Explain any specific methodologic strategies you would use. For example, if you were conducting a case-control study, how would you select your cases and controls?

    · Consider the methods you would use to make these selections. What are the strengths and limitations of your selected approach?

    · Explain ethical considerations pertaining to your study.

    References for assignment one, use additional references

    Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024). Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice (4th ed.). Springer.

    Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). Epidemiology for public health practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

    **Discussion 2 (2 pages)**

    · Describe the role and responsibilities of the project manager in a quality improvement project.

    · Reintroduce the quality improvement practice gap identified in Week 3 or introduce a new practice gap.

    · Include the baseline metrics or objective data to support this as a practice gap.

    · Through the lens of a project manager, develop one measurable objective to close the identified quality improvement gap.

    · Must be in SMART goal format:

    · Specific

    · Measurable

    · Achievable

    · Relevant

    · Timebound

    · Recommend at least one new or different project management approach or tool the project manager might use for this quality improvement project.

    · Explain why this project management tool or approach is appropriate for this project.

    · Describe the strengths and limitations of this project management activity.

    **Assignment 2**

    Reflect on tools for measuring quality in nursing practice.

    Use sample paper template for the Tools and Methods for Quality Improvement attached

    **The Assignment (3pages)**

    Analyze evidence from the literature and course materials, synthesize the information, and develop a 3- to 4-page scholarly response, applying the following criteria:

    · Identify a patient care quality or safety gap in your selected healthcare organization.

    · Describe the patient care delivery gap or problem in nursing practice.

    · Include metrics or objective data and supporting information to substantiate this gap in nursing practice.

    · Address the type of indicator, such as structural, process, or outcomes.

    · Indicate the type of quality indicator, such as rate-based, prevention, patient safety, or nursing sensitive indicator.

    · Describe whether this quality indicator is risk adjusted. Why or why not?

    · How did the selected organization establish their target or benchmark metrics for this quality indicator? Be specific.

    · Analyze the impact of not meeting this quality indicator to:

    · Health equity and diversity

    · Patient and staff engagement

    · Human and financial to patients, the organization, or the healthcare system

    · Analyze two (2) journal articles, clinical guidelines, or professional practice organization position statement that supports best practices related to the identified gap in nursing practice

    **References for Assignment 2**

    · American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2024).
    [_The essentialsLinks to an external site._](https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials). AACN. https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials

    · Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).
    _Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines_ (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

    · Chapter 8, “Translation” (pp. 189–203)

    · Zellefrow, C., Spalla-King, T. (2024)
    [Development of the PICOT Decision Tree: A tool to Support Student LearningLinks to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/development-picot-decision-tree-tool-support/docview/3033891993/se-2?accountid=14872).
    _Journal of Nursing Education. 63_(4).

    ·
    **Document:** [Tools and Methods for Quality Improvement Paper Template (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/188092/files/15154676?wrap=1) [Download Tools and Methods for Quality Improvement Paper Template (Word document)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/188092/files/15154676/download?download_frd=1)

    · Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.).
    [_Quality improvement essentials toolkit_ Links to an external site.](https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/Quality-Improvement-Essentials-Toolkit.aspx) [Multimedia]. https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/Quality-Improvement-Essentials-Toolkit.aspx

    · Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.).
    [_RCA2: Improving root cause analyses and actions to prevent harm_ Links to an external site.](https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/RCA2-Improving-Root-Cause-Analyses-and-Actions-to-Prevent-Harm.aspx) [Multimedia]. https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/RCA2-Improving-Root-Cause-Analyses-and-Actions-to-Prevent-Harm.aspx

  • [Solved] Orgstruc

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Identify and describe each type of organizational structure (functional, service line, matrix and flat) 2. Create an organizational chart for each organizational structure discussed above and describe which one applies to the clinical site or your work environment. 3. Develop simple mission state…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. Identify and describe each type of organizational structure (functional, service line, matrix and flat)
    2. Create an organizational chart for each organizational structure discussed above and describe which one applies to the clinical site or your work environment.
    3. Develop simple mission statements that could be supported by each type of structure and present a rationale for their selection of the type of structure.

  • [Solved] Best friend

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Best friend.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Theory

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attached file – ## Theory.docx – ## SOCW_6060_week03_AnalysisofaTheoryWorksheet_toBuild.docx – ## theoryworksheet1.docx – SOCW_6060_FourCaseStudies_toBuild1.pdf **## Theory.docx** s you have read, theory guides the conceptualization of the client’s problem and how social workers as…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attached file

    – ## Theory.docx

    – ## SOCW_6060_week03_AnalysisofaTheoryWorksheet_toBuild.docx

    – ## theoryworksheet1.docx

    – SOCW_6060_FourCaseStudies_toBuild1.pdf

    **## Theory.docx**

    s you have read, theory guides the conceptualization of the client’s problem and how social workers assess and intervene relative to the problem. However, theory can also shape the self-reflective questions social workers ask themselves. Clients often come to social workers under stress or distress. This then affects how the social worker responds and thus the client-social worker relationship. As a result, Foley, Nash, and Munford (2009) employed attachment theory as a “lens in which to view the reflective process itself and to gain greater understanding and empathy for what each social worker within each unique social work-client relationship can access of that relationship for reflection” (pp. 44).

    This week, you will apply attachment theory to the case study you chose in Week 2. In other words, your theoretical orientation—or lens—is attachment theory as you analyze the case study.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184704/modules/items/7657426)

    To Prepare

    · Review the same case study you selected from last week’s Assignment. (
    **Remember:** You will be using this same case study throughout the entire course.) – ATTACHED SEPARATLY.

    · Use the Analysis of a Theory Worksheet to help you dissect the theory. Use this tool to dissect the theory, employ the information in the table to complete your Assignment, and then keep it to add to your Theories Study Guide in Week 11.

    · Review attachment theory and the following article listed in the Learning Resources: Foley, M., Nash, M., & Munford, R. (2009). Bringing practice into theory: Reflective practice and attachment theory.
    _Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 21_(1–2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss1-2id318

    **ASSIGNMENT BELOW**

    **Submit** a 1- to 2-page case write-up that addresses the following:

    · Summarize the assumptions of attachment theory in 2–3 sentences.

    · Identify the problem in your chosen case study to be worked on from an attachment theory perspective.

    · Explain how attachment theory defines and explains the cause of the problem in 1–2 sentences.

    · Develop two assessment questions that are guided by attachment theory that you would ask the client to understand how the stress or distress, bond, and/or environment is affecting the client.

    · Identify two interventions to address the problem. Remember, the theory should be driving the interventions. In other words, you would not identify systematic desensitization since this is not an intervention guided by attachment theory.

    · Write one self-reflective question that is influenced by attachment theory that you can ask yourself to gain greater empathy for what the client is experiencing.

    **Submit** also, as a separate document, your Week 3 Analysis of a Theory Worksheet.-
    **Worksheet attached separately.**

    **## SOCW_6060_week03_AnalysisofaTheoryWorksheet_toBuild.docx**

    **Analysis of Theory Worksheet**

    Use this worksheet to help you apply a theory as a lens to the case study for your assignments. Fill in the column on the right with all applicable information, and then consider it a reference for how to apply the theory. You must submit this worksheet, where indicated, in applicable assignments. Then you will compile the worksheet for your Theories Study Guide (that you can use for the licensure exam) at the end of the course.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Name of theory | |
    | Author or founder | |
    | Historical origin of theory | |
    | Basic assumptions | |
    | Underlying assumptions | |
    | Key concepts | |
    | Foci/unit of analysis | |
    | Philosophical or conceptual framework | |
    | Strengths of theory | |
    | Limitations of theory | |
    | Common criticisms | |
    | When and with whom it would be appropriate to use the theory/model | |
    | Consistency of theory/model with social work principles | |
    | Identification of goodness of fit with ethical principles | |
    | Ways in which theory/model informs research methods | |
    | Implications for social work practice | |

    1

    © Walden University, LLC

    **## theoryworksheet1.docx**

    **Worksheet: Dissecting a Theory and Its Application to a Case Study**

    Most theories can be dissected and analyzed. All theories will tell you something about their focus or unit of analysis. A theory will identify its major or key concepts. It will also point to the definition of the problem and its cause. This then guides how the social worker assesses and intervenes, because the theory will also articulate the role of the social worker and how change occurs.

    | |
    | — |
    | **Basic Assumptions of the Theory**<br>**Directions: For each section, respond in 2 to 3 sentences to the following prompts. Where relevant, provide citations to support your claims.** |
    | Name of theory<br>Systems Theory |
    | Name of theorist<br>Ludwig von Bertalanffy |
    | What are the major assumptions of the theory?<br>Systems are composed of interrelated subsystems that interact to maintain homeostasis; external inputs can disrupt balance, requiring adaptation for stability (Lund, 2024). Another core assumption is that behavior is always embedded within multiple ecological levels, including the person, group, organization, and community, and that a change to one part of a system will affect other parts (Jason & Bobak, 2022). |
    | What are the theory’s key concepts?<br>Subsystems, boundaries, homeostasis, feedback loops, and open/closed systems. Other key concepts according to Jason and Bobak (2022) include the ecological levels of analysis and the dynamic co-evolution of relationships and individual characteristics over time, which can be studied through methods like social network analysis. |
    | What is the theory’s focus or unit of analysis?<br>Interrelationships among systems, including individual, family, community, and societal levels. Other focus of the theory is on capturing the complex, dynamic interactions that occur within and between these levels, rather than isolating single variables. |
    | What is the theory’s overall explanation for the cause of problems?<br>Problems arise from disruptions in system interactions or failure to adapt to environmental changes, leading to imbalance. For example, a problem can be caused by a breakdown in social network dynamics, such as seeking advice from individuals who reinforce negative outcomes, or by a failure of larger community systems to provide adequate support. |
    | |
    | **Application to a Case Study <insert the name of the client>**<br>**Directions: For each section, respond to the following prompts. Where relevant, provide citations to support your claims.** |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory define the client’s presenting problem?<br>The presenting problem, which is homelessness and family abuse, is defined as a breakdown in the family system, where father's alcoholism disrupts homeostasis and affects subsystems like parental roles and child safety. |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory explain the cause of the client’s presenting problem?<br>The cause of the client’s problems is from external stressors (father's job loss) cascading into internal family dysfunction, with community systems (e.g., lack of support) exacerbating isolation and abuse cycles. |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory explain the role of the social worker for this client?<br>The social worker acts as a facilitator to assess and strengthen system connections, intervening at multiple levels to restore balance (Jason & Bobak, 2022). |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, what does the theory say about how this client will improve or how change will occur?<br>Change occurs through adaptive feedback, rebuilding family and community links to achieve homeostasis, such as through therapy and resources. |
    | Using the theory, list two to three (2–3) assessment questions to ask this client to explore the client’s goals and how they will get there.<br>1. How have interactions with your family and homeless community influenced your sense of safety? <br>2. What community resources could support rebuilding family stability? <br>3. How do you envision changes in your family system aligning with your goals? |
    | According to the theory, identify two to three specific practice intervention strategies for the client relative to the presenting problem. For each, explain in 1 sentence how it will help meet the client’s goals. <br>1. Family therapy: It restores communication and boundaries, promoting homeostasis. <br>2. Link to community services (e.g., housing support): It strengthens external subsystems for stability. <br>3. Peer group counseling: It builds positive feedback loops from chosen community. |
    | Based on the theory, list two to three (2–3) outcomes when analyzing whether an intervention is effective.<br>1. Improved family interactions and reduced conflict. <br>2. Stable housing and community integration. <br>3. Client reports enhanced homeostasis. |
    | What is one strength and one limitation in using this theory for this client?<br>A strength of the system’s theory is that it provides holistic view of family/community influences. One limitation of the theory is that it may underemphasize individual trauma. |
    | |
    | **Questions to Consider When Analyzing the Theory**<br>_You are not required to answer these questions for this assignment. However, these questions could help stimulate thinking whenever you are asked to analyze a theory._ |
    | To what extent does the theory apply widely to diverse situations? Or does it apply narrowly to particular situations? |
    | Is the theory ethical? Is it consistent with the NASW Code of Ethics? |
    | Is the theory congruent with the professional value base of the social work field? |
    | How cost effective would it be to implement interventions based on the theory? |
    | To what extent does the theory fit within the organization’s or agency’s philosophy? |
    | What do research studies say about how effective the interventions are? |

    **References**

    Jason, L. A., & Bobak, T. (2022). Using systems theory to improve intervention outcomes.
    _Professional Psychology: Research and Practice_,
    _53_(4), 415.
    [https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2022-66701-001.pdf](https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2022-66701-001.pdf)

    Lund, I. A. (2024). A systematic review of the effects of cybernetic systems theory on innovation management.
    [https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/176962/Aurora%20Lund%20Pro-gradu.pdf?sequence=1](https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/176962/Aurora%20Lund%20Pro-gradu.pdf?sequence=1)

    1

    © Walden University, LLC

    **SOCW_6060_FourCaseStudies_toBuild1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/socw-6060-fourcasestudies-tobuild1-pdf-10398227)

    **SOCW_6060_FourCaseStudies_toBuild1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/socw-6060-fourcasestudies-tobuild1-pdf-10398227)

    **## Theory.docx**

    s you have read, theory guides the conceptualization of the client’s problem and how social workers assess and intervene relative to the problem. However, theory can also shape the self-reflective questions social workers ask themselves. Clients often come to social workers under stress or distress. This then affects how the social worker responds and thus the client-social worker relationship. As a result, Foley, Nash, and Munford (2009) employed attachment theory as a “lens in which to view the reflective process itself and to gain greater understanding and empathy for what each social worker within each unique social work-client relationship can access of that relationship for reflection” (pp. 44).

    This week, you will apply attachment theory to the case study you chose in Week 2. In other words, your theoretical orientation—or lens—is attachment theory as you analyze the case study.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184704/modules/items/7657426)

    To Prepare

    · Review the same case study you selected from last week’s Assignment. (
    **Remember:** You will be using this same case study throughout the entire course.) – ATTACHED SEPARATLY.

    · Use the Analysis of a Theory Worksheet to help you dissect the theory. Use this tool to dissect the theory, employ the information in the table to complete your Assignment, and then keep it to add to your Theories Study Guide in Week 11.

    · Review attachment theory and the following article listed in the Learning Resources: Foley, M., Nash, M., & Munford, R. (2009). Bringing practice into theory: Reflective practice and attachment theory.
    _Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 21_(1–2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss1-2id318

    **ASSIGNMENT BELOW**

    **Submit** a 1- to 2-page case write-up that addresses the following:

    · Summarize the assumptions of attachment theory in 2–3 sentences.

    · Identify the problem in your chosen case study to be worked on from an attachment theory perspective.

    · Explain how attachment theory defines and explains the cause of the problem in 1–2 sentences.

    · Develop two assessment questions that are guided by attachment theory that you would ask the client to understand how the stress or distress, bond, and/or environment is affecting the client.

    · Identify two interventions to address the problem. Remember, the theory should be driving the interventions. In other words, you would not identify systematic desensitization since this is not an intervention guided by attachment theory.

    · Write one self-reflective question that is influenced by attachment theory that you can ask yourself to gain greater empathy for what the client is experiencing.

    **Submit** also, as a separate document, your Week 3 Analysis of a Theory Worksheet.-
    **Worksheet attached separately.**

    **## SOCW_6060_week03_AnalysisofaTheoryWorksheet_toBuild.docx**

    **Analysis of Theory Worksheet**

    Use this worksheet to help you apply a theory as a lens to the case study for your assignments. Fill in the column on the right with all applicable information, and then consider it a reference for how to apply the theory. You must submit this worksheet, where indicated, in applicable assignments. Then you will compile the worksheet for your Theories Study Guide (that you can use for the licensure exam) at the end of the course.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Name of theory | |
    | Author or founder | |
    | Historical origin of theory | |
    | Basic assumptions | |
    | Underlying assumptions | |
    | Key concepts | |
    | Foci/unit of analysis | |
    | Philosophical or conceptual framework | |
    | Strengths of theory | |
    | Limitations of theory | |
    | Common criticisms | |
    | When and with whom it would be appropriate to use the theory/model | |
    | Consistency of theory/model with social work principles | |
    | Identification of goodness of fit with ethical principles | |
    | Ways in which theory/model informs research methods | |
    | Implications for social work practice | |

    1

    © Walden University, LLC

    **## theoryworksheet1.docx**

    **Worksheet: Dissecting a Theory and Its Application to a Case Study**

    Most theories can be dissected and analyzed. All theories will tell you something about their focus or unit of analysis. A theory will identify its major or key concepts. It will also point to the definition of the problem and its cause. This then guides how the social worker assesses and intervenes, because the theory will also articulate the role of the social worker and how change occurs.

    | |
    | — |
    | **Basic Assumptions of the Theory**<br>**Directions: For each section, respond in 2 to 3 sentences to the following prompts. Where relevant, provide citations to support your claims.** |
    | Name of theory<br>Systems Theory |
    | Name of theorist<br>Ludwig von Bertalanffy |
    | What are the major assumptions of the theory?<br>Systems are composed of interrelated subsystems that interact to maintain homeostasis; external inputs can disrupt balance, requiring adaptation for stability (Lund, 2024). Another core assumption is that behavior is always embedded within multiple ecological levels, including the person, group, organization, and community, and that a change to one part of a system will affect other parts (Jason & Bobak, 2022). |
    | What are the theory’s key concepts?<br>Subsystems, boundaries, homeostasis, feedback loops, and open/closed systems. Other key concepts according to Jason and Bobak (2022) include the ecological levels of analysis and the dynamic co-evolution of relationships and individual characteristics over time, which can be studied through methods like social network analysis. |
    | What is the theory’s focus or unit of analysis?<br>Interrelationships among systems, including individual, family, community, and societal levels. Other focus of the theory is on capturing the complex, dynamic interactions that occur within and between these levels, rather than isolating single variables. |
    | What is the theory’s overall explanation for the cause of problems?<br>Problems arise from disruptions in system interactions or failure to adapt to environmental changes, leading to imbalance. For example, a problem can be caused by a breakdown in social network dynamics, such as seeking advice from individuals who reinforce negative outcomes, or by a failure of larger community systems to provide adequate support. |
    | |
    | **Application to a Case Study <insert the name of the client>**<br>**Directions: For each section, respond to the following prompts. Where relevant, provide citations to support your claims.** |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory define the client’s presenting problem?<br>The presenting problem, which is homelessness and family abuse, is defined as a breakdown in the family system, where father's alcoholism disrupts homeostasis and affects subsystems like parental roles and child safety. |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory explain the cause of the client’s presenting problem?<br>The cause of the client’s problems is from external stressors (father's job loss) cascading into internal family dysfunction, with community systems (e.g., lack of support) exacerbating isolation and abuse cycles. |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory explain the role of the social worker for this client?<br>The social worker acts as a facilitator to assess and strengthen system connections, intervening at multiple levels to restore balance (Jason & Bobak, 2022). |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, what does the theory say about how this client will improve or how change will occur?<br>Change occurs through adaptive feedback, rebuilding family and community links to achieve homeostasis, such as through therapy and resources. |
    | Using the theory, list two to three (2–3) assessment questions to ask this client to explore the client’s goals and how they will get there.<br>1. How have interactions with your family and homeless community influenced your sense of safety? <br>2. What community resources could support rebuilding family stability? <br>3. How do you envision changes in your family system aligning with your goals? |
    | According to the theory, identify two to three specific practice intervention strategies for the client relative to the presenting problem. For each, explain in 1 sentence how it will help meet the client’s goals. <br>1. Family therapy: It restores communication and boundaries, promoting homeostasis. <br>2. Link to community services (e.g., housing support): It strengthens external subsystems for stability. <br>3. Peer group counseling: It builds positive feedback loops from chosen community. |
    | Based on the theory, list two to three (2–3) outcomes when analyzing whether an intervention is effective.<br>1. Improved family interactions and reduced conflict. <br>2. Stable housing and community integration. <br>3. Client reports enhanced homeostasis. |
    | What is one strength and one limitation in using this theory for this client?<br>A strength of the system’s theory is that it provides holistic view of family/community influences. One limitation of the theory is that it may underemphasize individual trauma. |
    | |
    | **Questions to Consider When Analyzing the Theory**<br>_You are not required to answer these questions for this assignment. However, these questions could help stimulate thinking whenever you are asked to analyze a theory._ |
    | To what extent does the theory apply widely to diverse situations? Or does it apply narrowly to particular situations? |
    | Is the theory ethical? Is it consistent with the NASW Code of Ethics? |
    | Is the theory congruent with the professional value base of the social work field? |
    | How cost effective would it be to implement interventions based on the theory? |
    | To what extent does the theory fit within the organization’s or agency’s philosophy? |
    | What do research studies say about how effective the interventions are? |

    **References**

    Jason, L. A., & Bobak, T. (2022). Using systems theory to improve intervention outcomes.
    _Professional Psychology: Research and Practice_,
    _53_(4), 415.
    [https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2022-66701-001.pdf](https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2022-66701-001.pdf)

    Lund, I. A. (2024). A systematic review of the effects of cybernetic systems theory on innovation management.
    [https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/176962/Aurora%20Lund%20Pro-gradu.pdf?sequence=1](https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/176962/Aurora%20Lund%20Pro-gradu.pdf?sequence=1)

    1

    © Walden University, LLC

    **SOCW_6060_FourCaseStudies_toBuild1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/socw-6060-fourcasestudies-tobuild1-pdf-10398227)

    **## Theory.docx**

    s you have read, theory guides the conceptualization of the client’s problem and how social workers assess and intervene relative to the problem. However, theory can also shape the self-reflective questions social workers ask themselves. Clients often come to social workers under stress or distress. This then affects how the social worker responds and thus the client-social worker relationship. As a result, Foley, Nash, and Munford (2009) employed attachment theory as a “lens in which to view the reflective process itself and to gain greater understanding and empathy for what each social worker within each unique social work-client relationship can access of that relationship for reflection” (pp. 44).

    This week, you will apply attachment theory to the case study you chose in Week 2. In other words, your theoretical orientation—or lens—is attachment theory as you analyze the case study.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/184704/modules/items/7657426)

    To Prepare

    · Review the same case study you selected from last week’s Assignment. (
    **Remember:** You will be using this same case study throughout the entire course.) – ATTACHED SEPARATLY.

    · Use the Analysis of a Theory Worksheet to help you dissect the theory. Use this tool to dissect the theory, employ the information in the table to complete your Assignment, and then keep it to add to your Theories Study Guide in Week 11.

    · Review attachment theory and the following article listed in the Learning Resources: Foley, M., Nash, M., & Munford, R. (2009). Bringing practice into theory: Reflective practice and attachment theory.
    _Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 21_(1–2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss1-2id318

    **ASSIGNMENT BELOW**

    **Submit** a 1- to 2-page case write-up that addresses the following:

    · Summarize the assumptions of attachment theory in 2–3 sentences.

    · Identify the problem in your chosen case study to be worked on from an attachment theory perspective.

    · Explain how attachment theory defines and explains the cause of the problem in 1–2 sentences.

    · Develop two assessment questions that are guided by attachment theory that you would ask the client to understand how the stress or distress, bond, and/or environment is affecting the client.

    · Identify two interventions to address the problem. Remember, the theory should be driving the interventions. In other words, you would not identify systematic desensitization since this is not an intervention guided by attachment theory.

    · Write one self-reflective question that is influenced by attachment theory that you can ask yourself to gain greater empathy for what the client is experiencing.

    **Submit** also, as a separate document, your Week 3 Analysis of a Theory Worksheet.-
    **Worksheet attached separately.**

    **## SOCW_6060_week03_AnalysisofaTheoryWorksheet_toBuild.docx**

    **Analysis of Theory Worksheet**

    Use this worksheet to help you apply a theory as a lens to the case study for your assignments. Fill in the column on the right with all applicable information, and then consider it a reference for how to apply the theory. You must submit this worksheet, where indicated, in applicable assignments. Then you will compile the worksheet for your Theories Study Guide (that you can use for the licensure exam) at the end of the course.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Name of theory | |
    | Author or founder | |
    | Historical origin of theory | |
    | Basic assumptions | |
    | Underlying assumptions | |
    | Key concepts | |
    | Foci/unit of analysis | |
    | Philosophical or conceptual framework | |
    | Strengths of theory | |
    | Limitations of theory | |
    | Common criticisms | |
    | When and with whom it would be appropriate to use the theory/model | |
    | Consistency of theory/model with social work principles | |
    | Identification of goodness of fit with ethical principles | |
    | Ways in which theory/model informs research methods | |
    | Implications for social work practice | |

    1

    © Walden University, LLC

    **## theoryworksheet1.docx**

    **Worksheet: Dissecting a Theory and Its Application to a Case Study**

    Most theories can be dissected and analyzed. All theories will tell you something about their focus or unit of analysis. A theory will identify its major or key concepts. It will also point to the definition of the problem and its cause. This then guides how the social worker assesses and intervenes, because the theory will also articulate the role of the social worker and how change occurs.

    | |
    | — |
    | **Basic Assumptions of the Theory**<br>**Directions: For each section, respond in 2 to 3 sentences to the following prompts. Where relevant, provide citations to support your claims.** |
    | Name of theory<br>Systems Theory |
    | Name of theorist<br>Ludwig von Bertalanffy |
    | What are the major assumptions of the theory?<br>Systems are composed of interrelated subsystems that interact to maintain homeostasis; external inputs can disrupt balance, requiring adaptation for stability (Lund, 2024). Another core assumption is that behavior is always embedded within multiple ecological levels, including the person, group, organization, and community, and that a change to one part of a system will affect other parts (Jason & Bobak, 2022). |
    | What are the theory’s key concepts?<br>Subsystems, boundaries, homeostasis, feedback loops, and open/closed systems. Other key concepts according to Jason and Bobak (2022) include the ecological levels of analysis and the dynamic co-evolution of relationships and individual characteristics over time, which can be studied through methods like social network analysis. |
    | What is the theory’s focus or unit of analysis?<br>Interrelationships among systems, including individual, family, community, and societal levels. Other focus of the theory is on capturing the complex, dynamic interactions that occur within and between these levels, rather than isolating single variables. |
    | What is the theory’s overall explanation for the cause of problems?<br>Problems arise from disruptions in system interactions or failure to adapt to environmental changes, leading to imbalance. For example, a problem can be caused by a breakdown in social network dynamics, such as seeking advice from individuals who reinforce negative outcomes, or by a failure of larger community systems to provide adequate support. |
    | |
    | **Application to a Case Study <insert the name of the client>**<br>**Directions: For each section, respond to the following prompts. Where relevant, provide citations to support your claims.** |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory define the client’s presenting problem?<br>The presenting problem, which is homelessness and family abuse, is defined as a breakdown in the family system, where father's alcoholism disrupts homeostasis and affects subsystems like parental roles and child safety. |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory explain the cause of the client’s presenting problem?<br>The cause of the client’s problems is from external stressors (father's job loss) cascading into internal family dysfunction, with community systems (e.g., lack of support) exacerbating isolation and abuse cycles. |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, how does the theory explain the role of the social worker for this client?<br>The social worker acts as a facilitator to assess and strengthen system connections, intervening at multiple levels to restore balance (Jason & Bobak, 2022). |
    | In 1 to 2 sentences, what does the theory say about how this client will improve or how change will occur?<br>Change occurs through adaptive feedback, rebuilding family and community links to achieve homeostasis, such as through therapy and resources. |
    | Using the theory, list two to three (2–3) assessment questions to ask this client to explore the client’s goals and how they will get there.<br>1. How have interactions with your family and homeless community influenced your sense of safety? <br>2. What community resources could support rebuilding family stability? <br>3. How do you envision changes in your family system aligning with your goals? |
    | According to the theory, identify two to three specific practice intervention strategies for the client relative to the presenting problem. For each, explain in 1 sentence how it will help meet the client’s goals. <br>1. Family therapy: It restores communication and boundaries, promoting homeostasis. <br>2. Link to community services (e.g., housing support): It strengthens external subsystems for stability. <br>3. Peer group counseling: It builds positive feedback loops from chosen community. |
    | Based on the theory, list two to three (2–3) outcomes when analyzing whether an intervention is effective.<br>1. Improved family interactions and reduced conflict. <br>2. Stable housing and community integration. <br>3. Client reports enhanced homeostasis. |
    | What is one strength and one limitation in using this theory for this client?<br>A strength of the system’s theory is that it provides holistic view of family/community influences. One limitation of the theory is that it may underemphasize individual trauma. |
    | |
    | **Questions to Consider When Analyzing the Theory**<br>_You are not required to answer these questions for this assignment. However, these questions could help stimulate thinking whenever you are asked to analyze a theory._ |
    | To what extent does the theory apply widely to diverse situations? Or does it apply narrowly to particular situations? |
    | Is the theory ethical? Is it consistent with the NASW Code of Ethics? |
    | Is the theory congruent with the professional value base of the social work field? |
    | How cost effective would it be to implement interventions based on the theory? |
    | To what extent does the theory fit within the organization’s or agency’s philosophy? |
    | What do research studies say about how effective the interventions are? |

    **References**

    Jason, L. A., & Bobak, T. (2022). Using systems theory to improve intervention outcomes.
    _Professional Psychology: Research and Practice_,
    _53_(4), 415.
    [https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2022-66701-001.pdf](https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2022-66701-001.pdf)

    Lund, I. A. (2024). A systematic review of the effects of cybernetic systems theory on innovation management.
    [https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/176962/Aurora%20Lund%20Pro-gradu.pdf?sequence=1](https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/176962/Aurora%20Lund%20Pro-gradu.pdf?sequence=1)

    1

    © Walden University, LLC

    **SOCW_6060_FourCaseStudies_toBuild1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/socw-6060-fourcasestudies-tobuild1-pdf-10398227)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4

  • [Solved] Catherine Owens

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Catherine Owens.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ResearchCritique2.docx **## ResearchCritique2.docx** **Research Critique 2** **Assignment Overview** This assignment is designed for nurse practitioner (NP) students to enhance skills in evidence-based practice by critically evaluating quantitative research. You will select and critique a prima…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ResearchCritique2.docx

    **## ResearchCritique2.docx**

    **Research Critique 2**

    **Assignment Overview**

    This assignment is designed for nurse practitioner (NP) students to enhance skills in evidence-based practice by critically evaluating quantitative research. You will select and critique a primary quantitative research article (not a review, meta-analysis, or qualitative study) on a primary care topic of your interest. Primary care topics may include, but are not limited to, chronic disease management (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), preventive health screenings, patient education interventions, or acute care in outpatient settings. The goal is to assess the article's credibility, methodological rigor, and applicability to NP clinical practice.

    **Learning Objectives**

    · Demonstrate the ability to locate and select appropriate quantitative primary research.

    · Apply a systematic framework to critique research elements, identifying strengths, limitations, and biases.

    · Evaluate the clinical significance of findings for primary care and NP decision-making.

    · Practice scholarly writing in APA format, integrating critical analysis with evidence-based insights.

    **Instructions**

    1.
    **Article Selection**:

    · Choose a peer-reviewed, quantitative primary research article published within the last 10 years (2015 or later) from a reputable nursing or medical journal (e.g., Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice).

    · The article must report original data collection and analysis (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational designs like RCTs, cohort studies, or surveys). Exclude systematic reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, or qualitative studies.

    · Ensure the topic aligns with primary care and is of personal interest to you—justify your choice in the introduction.

    · Submit a PDF copy of the full article with your critique (do not summarize or paraphrase the article without attaching it).

    2.
    **Critique Format and Length**:

    · Write a 3-4 page paper (excluding title page, references, and the attached article).

    · Use APA 7th edition formatting: Double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins.

    · Structure the paper with the following sections (use headings). Base your critique on a systematic approach, drawing from established guidelines for evaluating quantitative research.

    3.
    **Required Sections of the Critique**: Use the following structure to organize your paper. For each section, incorporate specific questions to guide your analysis (adapted from critiquing frameworks).

    ·
    **Introduction (up to 0.5 page)**:

    · Briefly summarize the article's purpose, research question/hypothesis, methods, key findings, and conclusions.

    · Explain why you selected this article and topic (e.g., relevance to your future NP practice in primary care).

    · State the article's overall believability based on initial impressions (e.g., author credentials, journal quality).

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the title clear and accurate? Does the abstract provide a concise overview? Do the authors have relevant qualifications?

    ·
    **Critique of Research Problem and Literature Review (up to 0.5 page)**:

    · Evaluate the clarity and significance of the research problem or purpose.

    · Assess the literature review: Is it comprehensive, balanced, and recent? Does it justify the need for the study?

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the problem logically consistent with the literature? Are primary sources used? Is a theoretical framework identified and appropriate?

    ·
    **Critique of Methods (0.5-1 pages)**:

    · Describe and evaluate the research design (e.g., experimental vs. non-experimental), sample (size, selection, inclusion/exclusion criteria), data collection instruments, and ethical considerations.

    · Discuss validity, reliability, and potential biases (e.g., sampling bias, measurement error).

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the design appropriate for the research question? Was the sample adequate and representative? Were ethical permissions obtained? Was a pilot study conducted?

    ·
    **Critique of Results and Data Analysis (0.5-1 page)**:

    · Summarize the statistical methods used and key results (e.g., p-values, confidence intervals, effect sizes).

    · Evaluate appropriateness of analyses and whether results support the hypothesis.

    _Guiding Questions_: Was the data analysis suitable (e.g., parametric vs. non-parametric tests)? Are findings significant and linked back to the literature? What is the risk of Type I/II errors?

    ·
    **Critique of Discussion, Conclusions, and Implications (0.5-1 page)**:

    · Assess how findings are interpreted, including strengths, limitations, and generalizability.

    · Discuss clinical significance: How do the results apply to primary care? What are the implications for NP practice (e.g., changing protocols, patient education)?

    · Suggest recommendations for future research or practice.

    _Guiding Questions_: Do conclusions flow logically from the data? Are limitations honestly addressed? Is clinical relevance explored beyond statistical significance?

    ·
    **Overall Evaluation and References**:

    · Provide a balanced summary of the article's strengths and weaknesses.

    · Conclude with your recommendation: Is this research credible and useful for evidence-based NP practice in primary care?

    4.
    **Submission Requirements**:

    · Due Date: 9/24/2025 at 11:59 PM

    · Submit via Canvas

    · Late submissions will incur a 5% per day penalty.

    · Plagiarism: All work must be original; use proper citations for any external sources.

    **## ResearchCritique2.docx**

    **Research Critique 2**

    **Assignment Overview**

    This assignment is designed for nurse practitioner (NP) students to enhance skills in evidence-based practice by critically evaluating quantitative research. You will select and critique a primary quantitative research article (not a review, meta-analysis, or qualitative study) on a primary care topic of your interest. Primary care topics may include, but are not limited to, chronic disease management (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), preventive health screenings, patient education interventions, or acute care in outpatient settings. The goal is to assess the article's credibility, methodological rigor, and applicability to NP clinical practice.

    **Learning Objectives**

    · Demonstrate the ability to locate and select appropriate quantitative primary research.

    · Apply a systematic framework to critique research elements, identifying strengths, limitations, and biases.

    · Evaluate the clinical significance of findings for primary care and NP decision-making.

    · Practice scholarly writing in APA format, integrating critical analysis with evidence-based insights.

    **Instructions**

    1.
    **Article Selection**:

    · Choose a peer-reviewed, quantitative primary research article published within the last 10 years (2015 or later) from a reputable nursing or medical journal (e.g., Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice).

    · The article must report original data collection and analysis (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational designs like RCTs, cohort studies, or surveys). Exclude systematic reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, or qualitative studies.

    · Ensure the topic aligns with primary care and is of personal interest to you—justify your choice in the introduction.

    · Submit a PDF copy of the full article with your critique (do not summarize or paraphrase the article without attaching it).

    2.
    **Critique Format and Length**:

    · Write a 3-4 page paper (excluding title page, references, and the attached article).

    · Use APA 7th edition formatting: Double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins.

    · Structure the paper with the following sections (use headings). Base your critique on a systematic approach, drawing from established guidelines for evaluating quantitative research.

    3.
    **Required Sections of the Critique**: Use the following structure to organize your paper. For each section, incorporate specific questions to guide your analysis (adapted from critiquing frameworks).

    ·
    **Introduction (up to 0.5 page)**:

    · Briefly summarize the article's purpose, research question/hypothesis, methods, key findings, and conclusions.

    · Explain why you selected this article and topic (e.g., relevance to your future NP practice in primary care).

    · State the article's overall believability based on initial impressions (e.g., author credentials, journal quality).

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the title clear and accurate? Does the abstract provide a concise overview? Do the authors have relevant qualifications?

    ·
    **Critique of Research Problem and Literature Review (up to 0.5 page)**:

    · Evaluate the clarity and significance of the research problem or purpose.

    · Assess the literature review: Is it comprehensive, balanced, and recent? Does it justify the need for the study?

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the problem logically consistent with the literature? Are primary sources used? Is a theoretical framework identified and appropriate?

    ·
    **Critique of Methods (0.5-1 pages)**:

    · Describe and evaluate the research design (e.g., experimental vs. non-experimental), sample (size, selection, inclusion/exclusion criteria), data collection instruments, and ethical considerations.

    · Discuss validity, reliability, and potential biases (e.g., sampling bias, measurement error).

    _Guiding Questions_: Is the design appropriate for the research question? Was the sample adequate and representative? Were ethical permissions obtained? Was a pilot study conducted?

    ·
    **Critique of Results and Data Analysis (0.5-1 page)**:

    · Summarize the statistical methods used and key results (e.g., p-values, confidence intervals, effect sizes).

    · Evaluate appropriateness of analyses and whether results support the hypothesis.

    _Guiding Questions_: Was the data analysis suitable (e.g., parametric vs. non-parametric tests)? Are findings significant and linked back to the literature? What is the risk of Type I/II errors?

    ·
    **Critique of Discussion, Conclusions, and Implications (0.5-1 page)**:

    · Assess how findings are interpreted, including strengths, limitations, and generalizability.

    · Discuss clinical significance: How do the results apply to primary care? What are the implications for NP practice (e.g., changing protocols, patient education)?

    · Suggest recommendations for future research or practice.

    _Guiding Questions_: Do conclusions flow logically from the data? Are limitations honestly addressed? Is clinical relevance explored beyond statistical significance?

    ·
    **Overall Evaluation and References**:

    · Provide a balanced summary of the article's strengths and weaknesses.

    · Conclude with your recommendation: Is this research credible and useful for evidence-based NP practice in primary care?

    4.
    **Submission Requirements**:

    · Due Date: 9/24/2025 at 11:59 PM

    · Submit via Canvas

    · Late submissions will incur a 5% per day penalty.

    · Plagiarism: All work must be original; use proper citations for any external sources.

  • [Solved] myths

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    There are so many different "theories" and ideas about protein. According to Fink and Mikesky, the daily recommendation of proteins for athletes is 10-35% (depending on level and amount of activity). 9/12 Watch the following video and annotate any information that you feel is important to know, and …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    There are so many different "theories" and ideas about protein. According to Fink and Mikesky, the daily recommendation of proteins for athletes is 10-35% (depending on level and amount of activity).
    9/12 Watch the following video and annotate any information that you feel is important to know, and explain the information in your own words.
    https://youtu.be/bxUBoNABlTA?si=F-c6wrn4zggqcSJw

  • [Solved] Prehistoric Animals. Dinosaurs

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Prehistoric Animals. Dinosaurs , power point 20 diapositives and Referencia APA

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Prehistoric Animals. Dinosaurs  , power point 20 diapositives and Referencia APA