Tag: Psychology

  • [Solved] Discussion 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Discussion1.docx – ## TheorizingLivedExperiencesModule1.pdf – TheU.S.WomensMovement_ABriefHistory-1.pdf – Module1Spring2023FINAL.pptx – ABlackFeministStatementCombaheeRiverCollective.pdf – bellhooksfeminismisforeverybody.pdf – PatriarchyTheSystem_Anitnotahethemorus.pdf **## Discussion1.docx**…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Discussion1.docx

    – ## TheorizingLivedExperiencesModule1.pdf

    – TheU.S.WomensMovement_ABriefHistory-1.pdf
    – Module1Spring2023FINAL.pptx
    – ABlackFeministStatementCombaheeRiverCollective.pdf
    – bellhooksfeminismisforeverybody.pdf
    – PatriarchyTheSystem_Anitnotahethemorus.pdf

    **## Discussion1.docx**

    Discussion 1: Weeks 1-3

    **Discussion 1 is based on content from Module 1 (Weeks 1-3) and contains 5 questions.**

    **Part A, B, and C are mandatory, and Part B requires citations (total of 1 citation).  You should also respond to two classmate's posts. In order to ensure you receive the grade you have earned, remember to number your responses so it is clear to me which question you are answering.  See grading criteria link below for more information.**

    ***This discussion can be turned in 24 hours after the due date for a 20% late point deduction***

    **Part A**

    You were assigned three "Personal Essays From Various Feminist Scholars" to read. Choose
    **one** and answer the following:

    1. Summarize 2-3 main points the author made. Make sure to reference which article you are going to write about (
    **150 words minimum, 2 points**)

    2. Describe your reaction to these points. What areas, if any, resonated with you? What areas, if any, did not sit right with you? Why? Did this have any impact on the way you think about feminism? (
    **150 words minimum, 2 points**)

    **Part B**

    3. You learned about a lot of different concepts and perspectives in Module #1. Select one concept or perspective covered and expand on it in some way that was not covered in the course content. For example, you may have wanted to learn more about Latina/Chicana feminisms. You can take this opportunity to perform your own research and report back on what you find.  (
    **150 words minimum; 1 in-text citation and full reference required; must be from outside course content, 2 points**)

    **Part C (250 words minimum for Part C, 2 points)**

    4. Choose someone in your life and ask them their perspectives on feminism. You will ask the following questions and type up their responses here: Are you a feminist? Why or why not? What does feminism mean to you? In what ways, if any, do you think feminism has changed over time? How do others around you view feminism? Please feel free to add additional questions to this list. Don't forget to mention if they are a family member of yours or a friend (only if you want to, you can include their age, race, and other demographic details but please do
    **not** include their name).

    5. Reflect on their answers: What is your reaction to their response? Were you surprised? Pleased? Upset? Do their responses reflect any definitions of feminism or feminist viewpoints we’ve looked at so far in this class? Explain.

    **## TheorizingLivedExperiencesModule1.pdf**

    Theorizing Lived Experiences

    You may have heard the phrase "the personal is political" at some point in your life. This phrase, popularized by feminists
    in the 1960s, highlights the ways in which our personal experiences are shaped by political, economic, and cultural

    forces within the context of history, institutions, and culture. Socially-lived theorizing means creating feminist theories
    and knowledge from the actual day-to-day experiences of groups of people who have traditionally been excluded from

    the production of academic knowledge. Akey element to feminist analysis is a commitment to the creation of knowledge
    grounded in the experiences of people belonging to marginalized groups, including for example, women, people of color,
    people in the Global South, immigrants, indigenous people, gay, lesbian, queer, and trans people, poor and working-class
    people, and disabled people.

    Feminist theorists and activists argue for theorizing beginning from the experiences of the marginalized because
    people with less power and resources often experience the effects of oppressive social systems in ways that members
    of dominant groups do not. From the "bottom" of a social system, participants have knowledge of the power holders of

    that system as well as their own experiences, while the reverse is rarely true. Therefore, their experiences allow for a
    more complete knowledge of the workings of systems of power. For example, a story of the development of industry
    in the 19th century told from the perspective of the owners of factories would emphasize capital accumulation and

    industrial progress. However, the development of industry in the 19th century for immigrant workers meant working
    sixteen-hour days to feed themselves and their families and fighting for employer recognition of trade unions so that
    they could secure decent wages and the eight-hour work day. Depending on which point-of-view you begin with, you

    will have very different theories of how industrial capitalism developed, and how it works today.

    Feminism is not a single school of thought but encompasses diverse theories and analytical perspectives-such as
    socialist feminist theories, radical sex feminist theories, black feminist theories, queer feminist theories , transfeminist

    theories, feminist disability theories, and intersectional feminist theories.

    In the video below, "Barbie explains feminist theories;' Cristen, of "Ask Cristen;' defines feminisms

    generally as a project that works for the "political, social, and economic equality of the sexes;' and suggests

    that different types of feminist propose different sources of gender inequality and solutions. Cristen (with
    Barbie's help) identifies and defines 11 different types of feminism and the solutions they propose:

    • Liberal feminism . Marxist feminism

    • Radical feminism

    • Anti-porn feminism . Sex positive feminism

    • Separatist feminism . Cultural feminism

    • Womanism (intersectional feminism) . Postcolonial feminism . Ecofeminism

    • Girlie feminism

    What types of feminism do Cristen and Barbie leave out of this list? Do you agree with how they

    Theorizing Lived Experiences I 3

    characterize these types of feminism? Which issues across these feminisms do you think are most

    important?

    A YouTube element has been excluded from this version of the text. You can view it online here:

    https:,,«openbooks,library.umass,edu/introwgss/7p=24

    Stuff Mom Never Told You – HowStuffWorks. (2016, March 3). Barbie Explains Feminist Theories IRadical,

    Liberal, Black, etc. Retrieved from htt_ps:tfwww.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D C-Nes60.

    The common thread in all these feminist theories is the belief that knowledge is shaped by the political and social
    context in which it is made (Scott 1991). Acknowledging that all knowledge is constructed by individuals inhabiting

    particular social locations, feminist theorists argue that reflexivity-understanding how one's social position influences
    the ways that they understand the world-is of utmost necessity when creating theory and knowledge. As people occupy

    particular social locations in terms of race, class, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, age, and ability, these multiple identities in
    combination all at the same time shape their social experiences. At certain times, specific dimensions of their identities

    may be more salient than at others, but at no time is anyone without multiple identities. Thus, categories of identity
    are intersectional, influencing the experiences that individuals have and the ways they see and understand the world

    around them.
    In the United States, we often are taught to think that people are self-activating, self-actualizing individuals. We

    repeatedly hear that everyone is unique and that everyone has an equal chance to make something of themselves. While

    feminists also believe that people have agency-or the ability to influence the direction of their lives-they also argue that
    an individual's agency is limited or enhanced by their social position. A powerful way to understand oneself and one's

    4 I Theorizing Lived Experiences

    multiple identities is to situate one's experiences within multiple levels of analysis-micro – (individual), meso- (group),

    macro- (structural), and global. These levels of analysis offer different analytical approaches to understanding a social
    phenomenon. Connecting personal experiences to larger, structural forces of race, gender, ethnicity, class, sexuality,
    and ability allows for a more powerful understanding of how our own lives are shaped by forces greater than ourselves,

    and how we might work to change these larger forces of inequality. Like a microscope that is initially set on a view of
    the most minute parts of a cell, moving back to see the whole of the cell, and then pulling one's eye away from the
    microscope to see the whole of the organism, these levels of analysis allow us to situate day-to-day experiences and

    phenomena within broader, structural processes that shape whole populations. The micro level is that which we, as
    individuals, live everyday-interacting with other people on the street, in the classroom, or while we are at a party or a

    social gathering. Therefore, the micro-level is the level of analysis focused on individuals' experiences. The meso level
    of analysis moves the microscope back, seeing how groups, communities and organizations structure social life. Ameso
    level-analysis might look at how churches shape gender expectations for women, how schools teach students to become

    girls and boys, or how workplace policies make gender transition and recognition either easier or harder for trans and

    gender nonconforming workers. The macro level consists of government policies, programs, and institutions, as well as
    ideologies and categories of identity. In this way, the macro level involves national power structures as well as cultural

    ideas about different groups of people according to race, class, gender, and sexuality spread through various national

    institutions, such as media, education and policy. Finally, the global level of analysis includes transnational production,
    trade, and migration, global capitalism, and transnational trade and law bodies (such as the International Monetary Fund,

    the United Nations, the World Trade Organization)-larger transnational forces that bear upon our personal lives but
    that we often ignore or fail to see.

    How Macro Structures Impact People: Maquiladoras

    Applying multiple levels of analysis, let's look at the experiences of a Latina working in a maquiladora, a
    factory on the border of the US and Mexico. These factories were built to take advantage of the difference
    in the price of labor in these two countries. At the micro level, we can see the worker's daily struggles to

    feed herself and her family. We can see how exhausted she is from working every day for more than eight
    hours and then coming home to care for herself and her family. Perhaps we could examine how she has
    developed a persistent cough or skin problems from working with the chemicals in the factory and using
    water contaminated with run-off from the factory she lives near. On the meso-level, we can see how the

    community that she lives within has been transformed by the maquiladora, and how other women in her
    community face similar financial, health, and environmental problems. We may also see how these women

    are organizing together to attempt to form a union that can press for higher wages and benefits. Moving to
    the macro and global levels, we can situate these experiences within the Mexican government's

    participation within global and regional trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Act
    (NAFTA) and the Central American Free Trade Act (CAFTA) and their negative effects on environmental

    regulations and labor laws, as well as the effects of global capitalist restructuring that has shifted
    production from North America and Europe to Central and South America and Asia. For further discussion,

    see the textbook section on globalization.

    Recognizing how forces greater than ourselves operate in shaping the successes and failures we typically attribute
    to individual decisions allows us see how inequalities are patterned by race, class, gender, and sexuality-not just by

    individual decisions. Approaching these issues through multiple levels of analysis-at the micro, meso, and macro/global
    levels-gives a more integrative and complete understanding of both personal experience and the ways in which macro

    structures affect the people who live within them. Through looking at labor in a maquiladora through multiple levels

    Theorizing Lived Experiences I 5

    of analysis we are able to connect what are experienced at the micro level as personal problems to macro economic,
    cultural, and social problems. This not only gives us the ability to develop socially-lived theory, but also allows us to
    organize with other people who feel similar effects from the same economic, cultural, and social problems in order to
    challenge and change these problems.

    6 I Theorizing Lived Experiences

    **TheU.S.WomensMovement_ABriefHistory-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theu-s-womensmovement-abriefhistory-1-pdf)

    **Module1Spring2023FINAL.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module1spring2023final-pptx)

    **ABlackFeministStatementCombaheeRiverCollective.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ablackfeministstatementcombaheerivercollective-pdf)

    **bellhooksfeminismisforeverybody.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bellhooksfeminismisforeverybody-pdf)

    **PatriarchyTheSystem_Anitnotahethemorus.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/patriarchythesystem-anitnotahethemorus-pdf)

    **PatriarchyTheSystem_Anitnotahethemorus.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/patriarchythesystem-anitnotahethemorus-pdf)

    **## Discussion1.docx**

    Discussion 1: Weeks 1-3

    **Discussion 1 is based on content from Module 1 (Weeks 1-3) and contains 5 questions.**

    **Part A, B, and C are mandatory, and Part B requires citations (total of 1 citation).  You should also respond to two classmate's posts. In order to ensure you receive the grade you have earned, remember to number your responses so it is clear to me which question you are answering.  See grading criteria link below for more information.**

    ***This discussion can be turned in 24 hours after the due date for a 20% late point deduction***

    **Part A**

    You were assigned three "Personal Essays From Various Feminist Scholars" to read. Choose
    **one** and answer the following:

    1. Summarize 2-3 main points the author made. Make sure to reference which article you are going to write about (
    **150 words minimum, 2 points**)

    2. Describe your reaction to these points. What areas, if any, resonated with you? What areas, if any, did not sit right with you? Why? Did this have any impact on the way you think about feminism? (
    **150 words minimum, 2 points**)

    **Part B**

    3. You learned about a lot of different concepts and perspectives in Module #1. Select one concept or perspective covered and expand on it in some way that was not covered in the course content. For example, you may have wanted to learn more about Latina/Chicana feminisms. You can take this opportunity to perform your own research and report back on what you find.  (
    **150 words minimum; 1 in-text citation and full reference required; must be from outside course content, 2 points**)

    **Part C (250 words minimum for Part C, 2 points)**

    4. Choose someone in your life and ask them their perspectives on feminism. You will ask the following questions and type up their responses here: Are you a feminist? Why or why not? What does feminism mean to you? In what ways, if any, do you think feminism has changed over time? How do others around you view feminism? Please feel free to add additional questions to this list. Don't forget to mention if they are a family member of yours or a friend (only if you want to, you can include their age, race, and other demographic details but please do
    **not** include their name).

    5. Reflect on their answers: What is your reaction to their response? Were you surprised? Pleased? Upset? Do their responses reflect any definitions of feminism or feminist viewpoints we’ve looked at so far in this class? Explain.

    **## TheorizingLivedExperiencesModule1.pdf**

    Theorizing Lived Experiences

    You may have heard the phrase "the personal is political" at some point in your life. This phrase, popularized by feminists
    in the 1960s, highlights the ways in which our personal experiences are shaped by political, economic, and cultural

    forces within the context of history, institutions, and culture. Socially-lived theorizing means creating feminist theories
    and knowledge from the actual day-to-day experiences of groups of people who have traditionally been excluded from

    the production of academic knowledge. Akey element to feminist analysis is a commitment to the creation of knowledge
    grounded in the experiences of people belonging to marginalized groups, including for example, women, people of color,
    people in the Global South, immigrants, indigenous people, gay, lesbian, queer, and trans people, poor and working-class
    people, and disabled people.

    Feminist theorists and activists argue for theorizing beginning from the experiences of the marginalized because
    people with less power and resources often experience the effects of oppressive social systems in ways that members
    of dominant groups do not. From the "bottom" of a social system, participants have knowledge of the power holders of

    that system as well as their own experiences, while the reverse is rarely true. Therefore, their experiences allow for a
    more complete knowledge of the workings of systems of power. For example, a story of the development of industry
    in the 19th century told from the perspective of the owners of factories would emphasize capital accumulation and

    industrial progress. However, the development of industry in the 19th century for immigrant workers meant working
    sixteen-hour days to feed themselves and their families and fighting for employer recognition of trade unions so that
    they could secure decent wages and the eight-hour work day. Depending on which point-of-view you begin with, you

    will have very different theories of how industrial capitalism developed, and how it works today.

    Feminism is not a single school of thought but encompasses diverse theories and analytical perspectives-such as
    socialist feminist theories, radical sex feminist theories, black feminist theories, queer feminist theories , transfeminist

    theories, feminist disability theories, and intersectional feminist theories.

    In the video below, "Barbie explains feminist theories;' Cristen, of "Ask Cristen;' defines feminisms

    generally as a project that works for the "political, social, and economic equality of the sexes;' and suggests

    that different types of feminist propose different sources of gender inequality and solutions. Cristen (with
    Barbie's help) identifies and defines 11 different types of feminism and the solutions they propose:

    • Liberal feminism . Marxist feminism

    • Radical feminism

    • Anti-porn feminism . Sex positive feminism

    • Separatist feminism . Cultural feminism

    • Womanism (intersectional feminism) . Postcolonial feminism . Ecofeminism

    • Girlie feminism

    What types of feminism do Cristen and Barbie leave out of this list? Do you agree with how they

    Theorizing Lived Experiences I 3

    characterize these types of feminism? Which issues across these feminisms do you think are most

    important?

    A YouTube element has been excluded from this version of the text. You can view it online here:

    https:,,«openbooks,library.umass,edu/introwgss/7p=24

    Stuff Mom Never Told You – HowStuffWorks. (2016, March 3). Barbie Explains Feminist Theories IRadical,

    Liberal, Black, etc. Retrieved from htt_ps:tfwww.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D C-Nes60.

    The common thread in all these feminist theories is the belief that knowledge is shaped by the political and social
    context in which it is made (Scott 1991). Acknowledging that all knowledge is constructed by individuals inhabiting

    particular social locations, feminist theorists argue that reflexivity-understanding how one's social position influences
    the ways that they understand the world-is of utmost necessity when creating theory and knowledge. As people occupy

    particular social locations in terms of race, class, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, age, and ability, these multiple identities in
    combination all at the same time shape their social experiences. At certain times, specific dimensions of their identities

    may be more salient than at others, but at no time is anyone without multiple identities. Thus, categories of identity
    are intersectional, influencing the experiences that individuals have and the ways they see and understand the world

    around them.
    In the United States, we often are taught to think that people are self-activating, self-actualizing individuals. We

    repeatedly hear that everyone is unique and that everyone has an equal chance to make something of themselves. While

    feminists also believe that people have agency-or the ability to influence the direction of their lives-they also argue that
    an individual's agency is limited or enhanced by their social position. A powerful way to understand oneself and one's

    4 I Theorizing Lived Experiences

    multiple identities is to situate one's experiences within multiple levels of analysis-micro – (individual), meso- (group),

    macro- (structural), and global. These levels of analysis offer different analytical approaches to understanding a social
    phenomenon. Connecting personal experiences to larger, structural forces of race, gender, ethnicity, class, sexuality,
    and ability allows for a more powerful understanding of how our own lives are shaped by forces greater than ourselves,

    and how we might work to change these larger forces of inequality. Like a microscope that is initially set on a view of
    the most minute parts of a cell, moving back to see the whole of the cell, and then pulling one's eye away from the
    microscope to see the whole of the organism, these levels of analysis allow us to situate day-to-day experiences and

    phenomena within broader, structural processes that shape whole populations. The micro level is that which we, as
    individuals, live everyday-interacting with other people on the street, in the classroom, or while we are at a party or a

    social gathering. Therefore, the micro-level is the level of analysis focused on individuals' experiences. The meso level
    of analysis moves the microscope back, seeing how groups, communities and organizations structure social life. Ameso
    level-analysis might look at how churches shape gender expectations for women, how schools teach students to become

    girls and boys, or how workplace policies make gender transition and recognition either easier or harder for trans and

    gender nonconforming workers. The macro level consists of government policies, programs, and institutions, as well as
    ideologies and categories of identity. In this way, the macro level involves national power structures as well as cultural

    ideas about different groups of people according to race, class, gender, and sexuality spread through various national

    institutions, such as media, education and policy. Finally, the global level of analysis includes transnational production,
    trade, and migration, global capitalism, and transnational trade and law bodies (such as the International Monetary Fund,

    the United Nations, the World Trade Organization)-larger transnational forces that bear upon our personal lives but
    that we often ignore or fail to see.

    How Macro Structures Impact People: Maquiladoras

    Applying multiple levels of analysis, let's look at the experiences of a Latina working in a maquiladora, a
    factory on the border of the US and Mexico. These factories were built to take advantage of the difference
    in the price of labor in these two countries. At the micro level, we can see the worker's daily struggles to

    feed herself and her family. We can see how exhausted she is from working every day for more than eight
    hours and then coming home to care for herself and her family. Perhaps we could examine how she has
    developed a persistent cough or skin problems from working with the chemicals in the factory and using
    water contaminated with run-off from the factory she lives near. On the meso-level, we can see how the

    community that she lives within has been transformed by the maquiladora, and how other women in her
    community face similar financial, health, and environmental problems. We may also see how these women

    are organizing together to attempt to form a union that can press for higher wages and benefits. Moving to
    the macro and global levels, we can situate these experiences within the Mexican government's

    participation within global and regional trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Act
    (NAFTA) and the Central American Free Trade Act (CAFTA) and their negative effects on environmental

    regulations and labor laws, as well as the effects of global capitalist restructuring that has shifted
    production from North America and Europe to Central and South America and Asia. For further discussion,

    see the textbook section on globalization.

    Recognizing how forces greater than ourselves operate in shaping the successes and failures we typically attribute
    to individual decisions allows us see how inequalities are patterned by race, class, gender, and sexuality-not just by

    individual decisions. Approaching these issues through multiple levels of analysis-at the micro, meso, and macro/global
    levels-gives a more integrative and complete understanding of both personal experience and the ways in which macro

    structures affect the people who live within them. Through looking at labor in a maquiladora through multiple levels

    Theorizing Lived Experiences I 5

    of analysis we are able to connect what are experienced at the micro level as personal problems to macro economic,
    cultural, and social problems. This not only gives us the ability to develop socially-lived theory, but also allows us to
    organize with other people who feel similar effects from the same economic, cultural, and social problems in order to
    challenge and change these problems.

    6 I Theorizing Lived Experiences

    **TheU.S.WomensMovement_ABriefHistory-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theu-s-womensmovement-abriefhistory-1-pdf)

    **Module1Spring2023FINAL.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module1spring2023final-pptx)

    **ABlackFeministStatementCombaheeRiverCollective.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ablackfeministstatementcombaheerivercollective-pdf)

    **bellhooksfeminismisforeverybody.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bellhooksfeminismisforeverybody-pdf)

    **PatriarchyTheSystem_Anitnotahethemorus.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/patriarchythesystem-anitnotahethemorus-pdf)

    **## Discussion1.docx**

    Discussion 1: Weeks 1-3

    **Discussion 1 is based on content from Module 1 (Weeks 1-3) and contains 5 questions.**

    **Part A, B, and C are mandatory, and Part B requires citations (total of 1 citation).  You should also respond to two classmate's posts. In order to ensure you receive the grade you have earned, remember to number your responses so it is clear to me which question you are answering.  See grading criteria link below for more information.**

    ***This discussion can be turned in 24 hours after the due date for a 20% late point deduction***

    **Part A**

    You were assigned three "Personal Essays From Various Feminist Scholars" to read. Choose
    **one** and answer the following:

    1. Summarize 2-3 main points the author made. Make sure to reference which article you are going to write about (
    **150 words minimum, 2 points**)

    2. Describe your reaction to these points. What areas, if any, resonated with you? What areas, if any, did not sit right with you? Why? Did this have any impact on the way you think about feminism? (
    **150 words minimum, 2 points**)

    **Part B**

    3. You learned about a lot of different concepts and perspectives in Module #1. Select one concept or perspective covered and expand on it in some way that was not covered in the course content. For example, you may have wanted to learn more about Latina/Chicana feminisms. You can take this opportunity to perform your own research and report back on what you find.  (
    **150 words minimum; 1 in-text citation and full reference required; must be from outside course content, 2 points**)

    **Part C (250 words minimum for Part C, 2 points)**

    4. Choose someone in your life and ask them their perspectives on feminism. You will ask the following questions and type up their responses here: Are you a feminist? Why or why not? What does feminism mean to you? In what ways, if any, do you think feminism has changed over time? How do others around you view feminism? Please feel free to add additional questions to this list. Don't forget to mention if they are a family member of yours or a friend (only if you want to, you can include their age, race, and other demographic details but please do
    **not** include their name).

    5. Reflect on their answers: What is your reaction to their response? Were you surprised? Pleased? Upset? Do their responses reflect any definitions of feminism or feminist viewpoints we’ve looked at so far in this class? Explain.

    **## TheorizingLivedExperiencesModule1.pdf**

    Theorizing Lived Experiences

    You may have heard the phrase "the personal is political" at some point in your life. This phrase, popularized by feminists
    in the 1960s, highlights the ways in which our personal experiences are shaped by political, economic, and cultural

    forces within the context of history, institutions, and culture. Socially-lived theorizing means creating feminist theories
    and knowledge from the actual day-to-day experiences of groups of people who have traditionally been excluded from

    the production of academic knowledge. Akey element to feminist analysis is a commitment to the creation of knowledge
    grounded in the experiences of people belonging to marginalized groups, including for example, women, people of color,
    people in the Global South, immigrants, indigenous people, gay, lesbian, queer, and trans people, poor and working-class
    people, and disabled people.

    Feminist theorists and activists argue for theorizing beginning from the experiences of the marginalized because
    people with less power and resources often experience the effects of oppressive social systems in ways that members
    of dominant groups do not. From the "bottom" of a social system, participants have knowledge of the power holders of

    that system as well as their own experiences, while the reverse is rarely true. Therefore, their experiences allow for a
    more complete knowledge of the workings of systems of power. For example, a story of the development of industry
    in the 19th century told from the perspective of the owners of factories would emphasize capital accumulation and

    industrial progress. However, the development of industry in the 19th century for immigrant workers meant working
    sixteen-hour days to feed themselves and their families and fighting for employer recognition of trade unions so that
    they could secure decent wages and the eight-hour work day. Depending on which point-of-view you begin with, you

    will have very different theories of how industrial capitalism developed, and how it works today.

    Feminism is not a single school of thought but encompasses diverse theories and analytical perspectives-such as
    socialist feminist theories, radical sex feminist theories, black feminist theories, queer feminist theories , transfeminist

    theories, feminist disability theories, and intersectional feminist theories.

    In the video below, "Barbie explains feminist theories;' Cristen, of "Ask Cristen;' defines feminisms

    generally as a project that works for the "political, social, and economic equality of the sexes;' and suggests

    that different types of feminist propose different sources of gender inequality and solutions. Cristen (with
    Barbie's help) identifies and defines 11 different types of feminism and the solutions they propose:

    • Liberal feminism . Marxist feminism

    • Radical feminism

    • Anti-porn feminism . Sex positive feminism

    • Separatist feminism . Cultural feminism

    • Womanism (intersectional feminism) . Postcolonial feminism . Ecofeminism

    • Girlie feminism

    What types of feminism do Cristen and Barbie leave out of this list? Do you agree with how they

    Theorizing Lived Experiences I 3

    characterize these types of feminism? Which issues across these feminisms do you think are most

    important?

    A YouTube element has been excluded from this version of the text. You can view it online here:

    https:,,«openbooks,library.umass,edu/introwgss/7p=24

    Stuff Mom Never Told You – HowStuffWorks. (2016, March 3). Barbie Explains Feminist Theories IRadical,

    Liberal, Black, etc. Retrieved from htt_ps:tfwww.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D C-Nes60.

    The common thread in all these feminist theories is the belief that knowledge is shaped by the political and social
    context in which it is made (Scott 1991). Acknowledging that all knowledge is constructed by individuals inhabiting

    particular social locations, feminist theorists argue that reflexivity-understanding how one's social position influences
    the ways that they understand the world-is of utmost necessity when creating theory and knowledge. As people occupy

    particular social locations in terms of race, class, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, age, and ability, these multiple identities in
    combination all at the same time shape their social experiences. At certain times, specific dimensions of their identities

    may be more salient than at others, but at no time is anyone without multiple identities. Thus, categories of identity
    are intersectional, influencing the experiences that individuals have and the ways they see and understand the world

    around them.
    In the United States, we often are taught to think that people are self-activating, self-actualizing individuals. We

    repeatedly hear that everyone is unique and that everyone has an equal chance to make something of themselves. While

    feminists also believe that people have agency-or the ability to influence the direction of their lives-they also argue that
    an individual's agency is limited or enhanced by their social position. A powerful way to understand oneself and one's

    4 I Theorizing Lived Experiences

    multiple identities is to situate one's experiences within multiple levels of analysis-micro – (individual), meso- (group),

    macro- (structural), and global. These levels of analysis offer different analytical approaches to understanding a social
    phenomenon. Connecting personal experiences to larger, structural forces of race, gender, ethnicity, class, sexuality,
    and ability allows for a more powerful understanding of how our own lives are shaped by forces greater than ourselves,

    and how we might work to change these larger forces of inequality. Like a microscope that is initially set on a view of
    the most minute parts of a cell, moving back to see the whole of the cell, and then pulling one's eye away from the
    microscope to see the whole of the organism, these levels of analysis allow us to situate day-to-day experiences and

    phenomena within broader, structural processes that shape whole populations. The micro level is that which we, as
    individuals, live everyday-interacting with other people on the street, in the classroom, or while we are at a party or a

    social gathering. Therefore, the micro-level is the level of analysis focused on individuals' experiences. The meso level
    of analysis moves the microscope back, seeing how groups, communities and organizations structure social life. Ameso
    level-analysis might look at how churches shape gender expectations for women, how schools teach students to become

    girls and boys, or how workplace policies make gender transition and recognition either easier or harder for trans and

    gender nonconforming workers. The macro level consists of government policies, programs, and institutions, as well as
    ideologies and categories of identity. In this way, the macro level involves national power structures as well as cultural

    ideas about different groups of people according to race, class, gender, and sexuality spread through various national

    institutions, such as media, education and policy. Finally, the global level of analysis includes transnational production,
    trade, and migration, global capitalism, and transnational trade and law bodies (such as the International Monetary Fund,

    the United Nations, the World Trade Organization)-larger transnational forces that bear upon our personal lives but
    that we often ignore or fail to see.

    How Macro Structures Impact People: Maquiladoras

    Applying multiple levels of analysis, let's look at the experiences of a Latina working in a maquiladora, a
    factory on the border of the US and Mexico. These factories were built to take advantage of the difference
    in the price of labor in these two countries. At the micro level, we can see the worker's daily struggles to

    feed herself and her family. We can see how exhausted she is from working every day for more than eight
    hours and then coming home to care for herself and her family. Perhaps we could examine how she has
    developed a persistent cough or skin problems from working with the chemicals in the factory and using
    water contaminated with run-off from the factory she lives near. On the meso-level, we can see how the

    community that she lives within has been transformed by the maquiladora, and how other women in her
    community face similar financial, health, and environmental problems. We may also see how these women

    are organizing together to attempt to form a union that can press for higher wages and benefits. Moving to
    the macro and global levels, we can situate these experiences within the Mexican government's

    participation within global and regional trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Act
    (NAFTA) and the Central American Free Trade Act (CAFTA) and their negative effects on environmental

    regulations and labor laws, as well as the effects of global capitalist restructuring that has shifted
    production from North America and Europe to Central and South America and Asia. For further discussion,

    see the textbook section on globalization.

    Recognizing how forces greater than ourselves operate in shaping the successes and failures we typically attribute
    to individual decisions allows us see how inequalities are patterned by race, class, gender, and sexuality-not just by

    individual decisions. Approaching these issues through multiple levels of analysis-at the micro, meso, and macro/global
    levels-gives a more integrative and complete understanding of both personal experience and the ways in which macro

    structures affect the people who live within them. Through looking at labor in a maquiladora through multiple levels

    Theorizing Lived Experiences I 5

    of analysis we are able to connect what are experienced at the micro level as personal problems to macro economic,
    cultural, and social problems. This not only gives us the ability to develop socially-lived theory, but also allows us to
    organize with other people who feel similar effects from the same economic, cultural, and social problems in order to
    challenge and change these problems.

    6 I Theorizing Lived Experiences

    **TheU.S.WomensMovement_ABriefHistory-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theu-s-womensmovement-abriefhistory-1-pdf)

    **Module1Spring2023FINAL.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module1spring2023final-pptx)

    **ABlackFeministStatementCombaheeRiverCollective.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ablackfeministstatementcombaheerivercollective-pdf)

    **bellhooksfeminismisforeverybody.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bellhooksfeminismisforeverybody-pdf)

    **PatriarchyTheSystem_Anitnotahethemorus.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/patriarchythesystem-anitnotahethemorus-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6
    – 7

  • [Solved] Assistance II

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attachments – ## InstructionsI.docx – GabbidonBoisvert2012.pdf **## InstructionsI.docx** Answer the questions below using the document attached: There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. M…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attachments

    – ## InstructionsI.docx

    – GabbidonBoisvert2012.pdf

    **## InstructionsI.docx**

    Answer the questions below using the document attached: There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. 12-point, Times New Roman Font.

    **Questions (Answer Questions in full)**

    **1**. What was the general topic of this research (be specific)?

    **2**. Would this research be considered exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory? What makes

    this research one of these types?

    **a**. Based on your answer to #2, what is the guiding hypothesis of this research, or is

    there one? Please offer evidence to support your answer.

    **3**. What were the primary results of this study? In particular, how do race, gender, and

    political ideology impact attitudes toward the causation of crime? What significant

    effects were found, and where were they not found?

    **4.** Using evidence uncovered by the authors, make a case for which of the following

    variables has the greatest impact on theoretical attributions to the causes of crime: race,

    gender, and political orientation. In particular, based on the evidence presented, the

    authors found which of these variables to be most important, and what does this mean?

    Are these results in line with your preconceived notions regarding the correlates of

    theoretical attributions regarding the causes of crime?

    **5**. As was hopefully gleaned not only in the researchers’ independent work, but also from

    previous studies specified in the literature review – explain the importance of theory. In

    particular, how do our causal attributions (theoretical perspectives) inform our decisions

    from a policy perspective. Explain the interplay or linkages between theory and research

    – i.e., how is theory foundational to any form of scientific research, including in our

    field?

    **6**. As a follow up to question #5, let’s be honest here, why in the hell should we be

    concerned about the causal theoretical attributions of laypeople, or citizens, when it

    comes to criminal behavior? (Note: Keep in mind that there is a reason why we should

    care.) Why not just lean on us expert criminologists?

    **7**. How do causal or theoretical attributions impact attitudes on real-world CJ policy issues,

    like criminal sanctioning?

    **8**. Based on your reading of the article, how might future research in this area improve upon

    this study? What can be accomplished by future research that was not accomplished in

    this study?

    Format:

    There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced

    WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. Additionally, the

    project MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. All students must use 12-

    point, Times New Roman Font.

    **GabbidonBoisvert2012.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/gabbidonboisvert2012-pdf)

    **GabbidonBoisvert2012.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/gabbidonboisvert2012-pdf)

    **## InstructionsI.docx**

    Answer the questions below using the document attached: There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. 12-point, Times New Roman Font.

    **Questions (Answer Questions in full)**

    **1**. What was the general topic of this research (be specific)?

    **2**. Would this research be considered exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory? What makes

    this research one of these types?

    **a**. Based on your answer to #2, what is the guiding hypothesis of this research, or is

    there one? Please offer evidence to support your answer.

    **3**. What were the primary results of this study? In particular, how do race, gender, and

    political ideology impact attitudes toward the causation of crime? What significant

    effects were found, and where were they not found?

    **4.** Using evidence uncovered by the authors, make a case for which of the following

    variables has the greatest impact on theoretical attributions to the causes of crime: race,

    gender, and political orientation. In particular, based on the evidence presented, the

    authors found which of these variables to be most important, and what does this mean?

    Are these results in line with your preconceived notions regarding the correlates of

    theoretical attributions regarding the causes of crime?

    **5**. As was hopefully gleaned not only in the researchers’ independent work, but also from

    previous studies specified in the literature review – explain the importance of theory. In

    particular, how do our causal attributions (theoretical perspectives) inform our decisions

    from a policy perspective. Explain the interplay or linkages between theory and research

    – i.e., how is theory foundational to any form of scientific research, including in our

    field?

    **6**. As a follow up to question #5, let’s be honest here, why in the hell should we be

    concerned about the causal theoretical attributions of laypeople, or citizens, when it

    comes to criminal behavior? (Note: Keep in mind that there is a reason why we should

    care.) Why not just lean on us expert criminologists?

    **7**. How do causal or theoretical attributions impact attitudes on real-world CJ policy issues,

    like criminal sanctioning?

    **8**. Based on your reading of the article, how might future research in this area improve upon

    this study? What can be accomplished by future research that was not accomplished in

    this study?

    Format:

    There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced

    WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. Additionally, the

    project MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. All students must use 12-

    point, Times New Roman Font.

    **GabbidonBoisvert2012.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/gabbidonboisvert2012-pdf)

    **## InstructionsI.docx**

    Answer the questions below using the document attached: There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. 12-point, Times New Roman Font.

    **Questions (Answer Questions in full)**

    **1**. What was the general topic of this research (be specific)?

    **2**. Would this research be considered exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory? What makes

    this research one of these types?

    **a**. Based on your answer to #2, what is the guiding hypothesis of this research, or is

    there one? Please offer evidence to support your answer.

    **3**. What were the primary results of this study? In particular, how do race, gender, and

    political ideology impact attitudes toward the causation of crime? What significant

    effects were found, and where were they not found?

    **4.** Using evidence uncovered by the authors, make a case for which of the following

    variables has the greatest impact on theoretical attributions to the causes of crime: race,

    gender, and political orientation. In particular, based on the evidence presented, the

    authors found which of these variables to be most important, and what does this mean?

    Are these results in line with your preconceived notions regarding the correlates of

    theoretical attributions regarding the causes of crime?

    **5**. As was hopefully gleaned not only in the researchers’ independent work, but also from

    previous studies specified in the literature review – explain the importance of theory. In

    particular, how do our causal attributions (theoretical perspectives) inform our decisions

    from a policy perspective. Explain the interplay or linkages between theory and research

    – i.e., how is theory foundational to any form of scientific research, including in our

    field?

    **6**. As a follow up to question #5, let’s be honest here, why in the hell should we be

    concerned about the causal theoretical attributions of laypeople, or citizens, when it

    comes to criminal behavior? (Note: Keep in mind that there is a reason why we should

    care.) Why not just lean on us expert criminologists?

    **7**. How do causal or theoretical attributions impact attitudes on real-world CJ policy issues,

    like criminal sanctioning?

    **8**. Based on your reading of the article, how might future research in this area improve upon

    this study? What can be accomplished by future research that was not accomplished in

    this study?

    Format:

    There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced

    WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. Additionally, the

    project MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. All students must use 12-

    point, Times New Roman Font.

    **GabbidonBoisvert2012.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/gabbidonboisvert2012-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] PE Week 3 Discussion 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare:** – Review Chapter 5 in your course text. – Review Units 10 and 11 from the National Minority AIDS Council listed in this week’s Learning Resources. You also may want to review the recommended information on general APA ethical and code of conduct standards on the APA websites listed, …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare:**
    – Review Chapter 5 in your course text.
    – Review Units 10 and 11 from the National Minority AIDS Council listed in this week’s Learning Resources. You also may want to review the recommended information on general APA ethical and code of conduct standards on the APA websites listed, as well as the updated Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (2018) checklist of the program evaluation standards statements. Links to each of these websites may be found in this week’s Optional/Recommended Resources.
    – Consider your team’s Request for Proposal (RFP).
    **Post** an explanation of how ethical and professional standards and practices will impact your planning and choices for developing your proposal. Be specific in your description.

  • [Solved] Two Student Responses (300-400) Words

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Respond** to at least one of your colleagues’ posts, in which you focus on one or more of these following questions: – What more might you like to ask or share with a colleague? – What additional questions do you have for your colleague? Would you suggest any further actions not originally selecte…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Respond** to at least one of your colleagues’ posts, in which you focus on one or more of these following questions:
    – What more might you like to ask or share with a colleague?
    – What additional questions do you have for your colleague? Would you suggest any further actions not originally selected or described by your colleague?

  • [Solved] PE Week 3 Discussion 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare:** – Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially the Wilder Research (2009) article, “Program Theory and Logic Models.” – Consider the information contained in your team’s Request for Proposal. **Post** an explanation of how you would determine an appropriate program theory/concep…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare:**
    – Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially the Wilder Research (2009) article, “Program Theory and Logic Models.”
    – Consider the information contained in your team’s Request for Proposal.
    **Post** an explanation of how you would determine an appropriate program theory/conceptual framework to characterize a program. Explain what kind of information you would need to gather to be able to identify the program’s theoretical/conceptual framework. Describe who and what might be good sources of that information. How might you use the professional literature to “fill gaps”?

  • [Solved] Two Student Responses (300-400) Words

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Respond** to at least one of your colleagues’ posts, in which you focus on one or more of these following questions. – What more might you like to ask or share with a colleague? – What additional questions do you have for your colleague? Would you suggest any further actions not originally selecte…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Respond** to at least one of your colleagues’ posts, in which you focus on one or more of these following questions.
    – What more might you like to ask or share with a colleague?
    – What additional questions do you have for your colleague? Would you suggest any further actions not originally selected or described by your colleague?

  • [Solved] PE Week 3 Assignment 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare for this Assignment:** – Reflect on this week’s experiences with your team. **Assignment** Complete your journal entry for this week in your Personal Journal, reflecting on your experiences with the team process for this week. – How is it going? – What are you learning about yourself? -…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare for this Assignment:**
    – Reflect on this week’s experiences with your team.
    **Assignment**
    Complete your journal entry for this week in your Personal Journal, reflecting on your experiences with the team process for this week.
    – How is it going?
    – What are you learning about yourself?
    – What are you learning about the team process?
    – What seems to be working well? Not so well?
    – How might you continue to support your team’s development and ongoing progress?
    – What more may be needed to enhance the team process?
    – Share any other thoughts you may have.

  • [Solved] AIFP Week 3 Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare:** – View the videos of effective and ineffective witness testimony by a forensic expert, in the Learning Resources. – Review the Learning Resources that identify what makes a forensic expert witness effective or ineffective. – Critique each video, including consideration of what specif…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare:**
    – View the videos of effective and ineffective witness testimony by a forensic expert, in the Learning Resources.
    – Review the Learning Resources that identify what makes a forensic expert witness effective or ineffective.
    – Critique each video, including consideration of what specific instances demonstrated best practices for witness testimony. What specific instances demonstrated ineffective practices for expert witness testimony. Based on assigned readings, what recommendations/best practices might you have to strengthen the testimonies.
    **Post** your response to the following:
    – For the _Forensic Psychologist Dr. Shannon Curry Cross-Examined (Johnny Depp v Amber Heard Trial)_ video, analyze and describe what specific instance(s) demonstrated best practices for expert witness testimony.
    – For the _Johnny Depp's Lawyer Grills Amber Heard's Psychologist Over Diagnosis Procedure_ video, analyze and describe specific instance(s) demonstrated ineffective practices for expert witness testimony.
    – Based on assigned readings, what recommendations/best practices might you propose to strengthen both video expert witness testimonies.
    **Note:** Your posts should be substantial (500 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style.