My Blog

Tag: Psychology

  • [Solved] Article

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Article – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## GloriaTapes1.docx **## GloriaTapes1.docx** The Gloria Tapes The Gloria tapes showcase the approach of three of the pioneers in the foundation of individual psychotherapy and their very different approaches to the challenges of a single patient -Gloria. Review…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Article

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## GloriaTapes1.docx

    **## GloriaTapes1.docx**

    The Gloria Tapes

    The Gloria tapes showcase the approach of three of the pioneers in the foundation of individual psychotherapy and their very different approaches to the challenges of a single patient -Gloria. Review each of the videos below in preparation for completing this assignment.

    [All Three](https://youtu.be/G9oRc9DR4GQ?si=7f2XF6w9iyUk_W_M) approaches at once

    [Car Rogers](https://youtu.be/ee1bU4XuUyg?si=p_bAq6ybQhp1prLz) – Person Centered Therapy

    [Fritz Pearls](https://youtu.be/cpUVR43jZHk?si=DSyyECTXJlLtJUc2) – Gestalt Therapy

    [Albert Ellis](https://youtu.be/tcq4RMzSyng?si=SSAZTE8y-Y11r6hI) – Rational Emotive Therapy

    Assignment – I would like for you to watch the three approaches above. I have offered one link to allow you to watch the entire assignment at once, or individual links that will take you to each approach individually. The assignment will be easier if you watch all approaches in one sitting. After watching the video(s), address the following questions in a 3-5 page paper and submit to the Assignment Link for this assignment that will go through Turn It In.

    Address these questions for each of the therapists

    1) As you watch each technique (and doctor) what were your feelings? Did you like the therapist? Did you like the way he interacted with Gloria?

    2) How did Gloria react to the therapist? Did she warm to the session with foundational rapport?

    3) Do you feel that the approach was helpful to Gloria?

    Which approach resonated most with you? Which approach would you be more likely to use with Gloria and other clients?

    **## GloriaTapes1.docx**

    The Gloria Tapes

    The Gloria tapes showcase the approach of three of the pioneers in the foundation of individual psychotherapy and their very different approaches to the challenges of a single patient -Gloria. Review each of the videos below in preparation for completing this assignment.

    [All Three](https://youtu.be/G9oRc9DR4GQ?si=7f2XF6w9iyUk_W_M) approaches at once

    [Car Rogers](https://youtu.be/ee1bU4XuUyg?si=p_bAq6ybQhp1prLz) – Person Centered Therapy

    [Fritz Pearls](https://youtu.be/cpUVR43jZHk?si=DSyyECTXJlLtJUc2) – Gestalt Therapy

    [Albert Ellis](https://youtu.be/tcq4RMzSyng?si=SSAZTE8y-Y11r6hI) – Rational Emotive Therapy

    Assignment – I would like for you to watch the three approaches above. I have offered one link to allow you to watch the entire assignment at once, or individual links that will take you to each approach individually. The assignment will be easier if you watch all approaches in one sitting. After watching the video(s), address the following questions in a 3-5 page paper and submit to the Assignment Link for this assignment that will go through Turn It In.

    Address these questions for each of the therapists

    1) As you watch each technique (and doctor) what were your feelings? Did you like the therapist? Did you like the way he interacted with Gloria?

    2) How did Gloria react to the therapist? Did she warm to the session with foundational rapport?

    3) Do you feel that the approach was helpful to Gloria?

    Which approach resonated most with you? Which approach would you be more likely to use with Gloria and other clients?

  • [Solved] Philosophy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## EAB4764LectureSummaryTemplate.docx – EAB4764MayerChapters10and11Reinforcement.mp4 **## EAB4764LectureSummaryTemplate.docx** **EAB4764 Assessment and Intervention** **Lecture Engagement: Written Lecture Summary** | | | | — | — | | Student Name: | Date Completed: |…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## EAB4764LectureSummaryTemplate.docx

    – EAB4764MayerChapters10and11Reinforcement.mp4

    **## EAB4764LectureSummaryTemplate.docx**

    **EAB4764 Assessment and Intervention**

    **Lecture Engagement: Written Lecture Summary**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Student Name: | Date Completed: |
    | Student ID: | |

    Please answer the questions below in a narrative form. Each answer should be a complete paragraph.

    1. What was the main point of the video/podcast?

    2. Provide 2 major points discussed and describe those points.

    3. What did you learn from the video/podcast?

    **EAB4764MayerChapters10and11Reinforcement.mp4**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eab4764mayerchapters10and11reinforcement-mp4)

    **EAB4764MayerChapters10and11Reinforcement.mp4**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eab4764mayerchapters10and11reinforcement-mp4)

    **## EAB4764LectureSummaryTemplate.docx**

    **EAB4764 Assessment and Intervention**

    **Lecture Engagement: Written Lecture Summary**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Student Name: | Date Completed: |
    | Student ID: | |

    Please answer the questions below in a narrative form. Each answer should be a complete paragraph.

    1. What was the main point of the video/podcast?

    2. Provide 2 major points discussed and describe those points.

    3. What did you learn from the video/podcast?

    **EAB4764MayerChapters10and11Reinforcement.mp4**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eab4764mayerchapters10and11reinforcement-mp4)

    **## EAB4764LectureSummaryTemplate.docx**

    **EAB4764 Assessment and Intervention**

    **Lecture Engagement: Written Lecture Summary**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Student Name: | Date Completed: |
    | Student ID: | |

    Please answer the questions below in a narrative form. Each answer should be a complete paragraph.

    1. What was the main point of the video/podcast?

    2. Provide 2 major points discussed and describe those points.

    3. What did you learn from the video/podcast?

    **EAB4764MayerChapters10and11Reinforcement.mp4**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/eab4764mayerchapters10and11reinforcement-mp4)

  • [Solved] WRITE 3 PARAGRAPHS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering WRITE 3 PARAGRAPHS.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] see below

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Due tommorrow – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Week4_LearningResources_PsychologySeminar-Winter2024.pdf – ## Week4_Assignment3.pdf **## Week4_LearningResources_PsychologySeminar-Winter2024.pdf** LEARNING RESOURCES Required Resources APA STYLE American Psychological Association. (2019, October)….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Due tommorrow

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Week4_LearningResources_PsychologySeminar-Winter2024.pdf

    – ## Week4_Assignment3.pdf

    **## Week4_LearningResources_PsychologySeminar-Winter2024.pdf**

    LEARNING RESOURCES

    Required Resources

    APA STYLE
    American Psychological Association. (2019, October). About APA style
    (https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style) . https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style
    Walden University. (2021). APA basics checklist
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist
    Note: This interactive tutorial teaches the basics of APA style. It will take you approximately 20
    minutes to complete this tutorial.

    Walden University, LLC. (2021). APA tutorial [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    AVOIDING PLAGIARISM
    Note: You will complete the following two Writing Center plagiarism modules as part of this
    week's Assignment 1.

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding overt plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)
    [Interactive
    media].https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548803
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding passive plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)
    [Interactive
    media]https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548804

    Walden University, LLC. (2023). Incorporating evidence into your writing (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html) . [Interactive media]. Walden
    University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND ORGANIZATION
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Grammarly: Overview
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly
    Walden University. (2021). Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL plan)
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    WEEK 2 LEARNING ACTIVITY—USING CRITICAL THINKING
    STRATEGIES TO IDENTIFY SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND
    COGNITIVE BIAS

    Note: Review this interactive media first presented in Week 2.
    Walden University, LLC. (2021). Using critical thinking strategies to identify scientific
    evidence and cognitive bias [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    **## Week4_Assignment3.pdf**

    Due Sunday by 10:59pm
    Points 70
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586

    Recall the Week 2 Learning Activity where you categorized a series of statements as value, anecdote, or
    evidence statements. You can review the activity in this week’s Learning Resources if you wish. Recall
    that value and anecdote statements are based on personal beliefs, experiences, or observations and
    have no scientific credibility. Evidence statements do have scientific credibility because they are based
    on scientific research. When you are responding to Discussions or writing papers for Assignments, it is
    important to use evidence statements to support your ideas and arguments with credible scientific
    research. It also is important to know how to paraphrase the evidence statements and accurately cite
    and reference the original sources.

    For this Assignment, you will build upon the skills you practiced in Weeks 2 and 3 by reading a journal
    article and then writing evidence statements to support value and anecdote statements. You will also
    practice paraphrasing, citing, and referencing your sources using APA style.

    WRITING EVIDENCE STATEMENTS

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604)

    Revisit the interactive media, “Using Critical Thinking Strategies to Identify Scientific Evidence and
    Cognitive Bias.” Review the definitions and examples of value, anecdote, and evidence statements.
    Reflect on what you learned in Week 3 about how to read journal articles and what you learned this
    week about how to effectively paraphrase sources.
    Review the article, “Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL Plan).” Consider how you could use the MEAL
    plan strategy to organize your writing.
    Review the Learning Resources on APA style. Pay particular attention to how to format citations and
    journal article references.
    Review the following article and the example of a completed assignment template to help you
    understand how to complete this week’s assignment. Pay particular attention to how the author of the
    example template wrote evidence statements to support the value and anecdote statements, wrote a
    summary of the article using the MEAL Plan strategy, and cited and referenced the article using APA
    style. You will use a different article and template to complete your Week 4 Assignment 2; these
    files are here for you to use only as guiding examples.

    Go to the Announcements area of the classroom to find your assigned article and blank template for
    this Assignment. Read the assigned article and complete the Assignment using the specific instructions
    in the template. Remember to apply what you learned about effectively paraphrasing and citing and
    referencing sources using APA Style.

    Marrs, H., Barb, M. R., & Ruggiero, J. C. (2007). Self-reported influences on psychology major
    choice and personality (https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-
    18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200) . Individual Differences Research,
    5(4), 289–299.

    Document: Week 4 Assignment 3 Template Example (PDF)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    TO PREPARE:

    BY DAY 7

    ARTICLE AND EXAMPLE FOR WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 3

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_2000_Week4_Assignment3_Rubric

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK4Assgn3_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    10 pts

    10 pts

    30 pts

    5 pts

    Value
    Statement
    Evidence

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Evidence statement
    supports the value
    statement with information
    from the article and includes
    citations where needed.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient

    Evidence statement either
    does not support the value
    statement with information
    from the article or does not
    include citations where
    needed.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Evidence statement neither
    supports the value
    statement with information
    from the article nor
    includes citations where
    needed.

    Anecdote
    Statement
    Evidence

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Evidence statement
    supports the anecdote
    statement with information
    from the article and includes
    citations where needed.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient

    Evidence statement either
    does not support the
    anecdote statement with
    information from the article or
    does not include citations
    where needed.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Evidence statement neither
    supports the anecdote
    statement with information
    from the article nor
    includes citations where
    needed.

    MEAL Plan
    Summary

    30 to >26.0 pts
    Exemplary
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes all four
    required components (Main
    Idea, Evidence, Analysis,
    Lead Out) and citations
    where needed.

    26 to >20.0 pts
    Proficient
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes some of
    the four required components
    (Main Idea, Evidence,
    Analysis, Lead Out) and/or
    misses some citations where
    needed.

    20 to >0 pts
    Developing
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes few of
    the four required
    components (Main Idea,
    Evidence, Analysis, Lead
    Out) and/or misses most
    citations where needed.

    APA Style
    Reference

    5 to >4.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Few or no APA style
    errors.

    4 to >3.0 pts
    Proficient

    Several APA style
    errors.

    3 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Many APA style errors or reference not
    attempted.

    Total Points: 70

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    15 pts

    Quality of
    Writing

    15 to >13.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Writing is clear and
    organized with few or no
    errors in mechanics, usage,
    grammar, or spelling
    (MUGS). Most writing is
    original (i.e., use of own
    words and proper
    paraphrasing).

    13 to >10.0 pts
    Proficient

    Writing is somewhat clear
    and organized with some
    MUGS errors or there is an
    underuse of original writing
    (i.e., use of own words and
    proper paraphrasing).

    10 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Writing is unclear and/or
    disorganized and/or
    contains many MUGS
    errors or most writing
    comes from outside
    sources (i.e., underuse of
    original writing, overuse of
    directly quoted content).

    **## Week4_Assignment3.pdf**

    Due Sunday by 10:59pm
    Points 70
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586

    Recall the Week 2 Learning Activity where you categorized a series of statements as value, anecdote, or
    evidence statements. You can review the activity in this week’s Learning Resources if you wish. Recall
    that value and anecdote statements are based on personal beliefs, experiences, or observations and
    have no scientific credibility. Evidence statements do have scientific credibility because they are based
    on scientific research. When you are responding to Discussions or writing papers for Assignments, it is
    important to use evidence statements to support your ideas and arguments with credible scientific
    research. It also is important to know how to paraphrase the evidence statements and accurately cite
    and reference the original sources.

    For this Assignment, you will build upon the skills you practiced in Weeks 2 and 3 by reading a journal
    article and then writing evidence statements to support value and anecdote statements. You will also
    practice paraphrasing, citing, and referencing your sources using APA style.

    WRITING EVIDENCE STATEMENTS

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604)

    Revisit the interactive media, “Using Critical Thinking Strategies to Identify Scientific Evidence and
    Cognitive Bias.” Review the definitions and examples of value, anecdote, and evidence statements.
    Reflect on what you learned in Week 3 about how to read journal articles and what you learned this
    week about how to effectively paraphrase sources.
    Review the article, “Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL Plan).” Consider how you could use the MEAL
    plan strategy to organize your writing.
    Review the Learning Resources on APA style. Pay particular attention to how to format citations and
    journal article references.
    Review the following article and the example of a completed assignment template to help you
    understand how to complete this week’s assignment. Pay particular attention to how the author of the
    example template wrote evidence statements to support the value and anecdote statements, wrote a
    summary of the article using the MEAL Plan strategy, and cited and referenced the article using APA
    style. You will use a different article and template to complete your Week 4 Assignment 2; these
    files are here for you to use only as guiding examples.

    Go to the Announcements area of the classroom to find your assigned article and blank template for
    this Assignment. Read the assigned article and complete the Assignment using the specific instructions
    in the template. Remember to apply what you learned about effectively paraphrasing and citing and
    referencing sources using APA Style.

    Marrs, H., Barb, M. R., & Ruggiero, J. C. (2007). Self-reported influences on psychology major
    choice and personality (https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-
    18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200) . Individual Differences Research,
    5(4), 289–299.

    Document: Week 4 Assignment 3 Template Example (PDF)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    TO PREPARE:

    BY DAY 7

    ARTICLE AND EXAMPLE FOR WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 3

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_2000_Week4_Assignment3_Rubric

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK4Assgn3_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    10 pts

    10 pts

    30 pts

    5 pts

    Value
    Statement
    Evidence

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Evidence statement
    supports the value
    statement with information
    from the article and includes
    citations where needed.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient

    Evidence statement either
    does not support the value
    statement with information
    from the article or does not
    include citations where
    needed.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Evidence statement neither
    supports the value
    statement with information
    from the article nor
    includes citations where
    needed.

    Anecdote
    Statement
    Evidence

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Evidence statement
    supports the anecdote
    statement with information
    from the article and includes
    citations where needed.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient

    Evidence statement either
    does not support the
    anecdote statement with
    information from the article or
    does not include citations
    where needed.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Evidence statement neither
    supports the anecdote
    statement with information
    from the article nor
    includes citations where
    needed.

    MEAL Plan
    Summary

    30 to >26.0 pts
    Exemplary
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes all four
    required components (Main
    Idea, Evidence, Analysis,
    Lead Out) and citations
    where needed.

    26 to >20.0 pts
    Proficient
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes some of
    the four required components
    (Main Idea, Evidence,
    Analysis, Lead Out) and/or
    misses some citations where
    needed.

    20 to >0 pts
    Developing
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes few of
    the four required
    components (Main Idea,
    Evidence, Analysis, Lead
    Out) and/or misses most
    citations where needed.

    APA Style
    Reference

    5 to >4.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Few or no APA style
    errors.

    4 to >3.0 pts
    Proficient

    Several APA style
    errors.

    3 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Many APA style errors or reference not
    attempted.

    Total Points: 70

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    15 pts

    Quality of
    Writing

    15 to >13.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Writing is clear and
    organized with few or no
    errors in mechanics, usage,
    grammar, or spelling
    (MUGS). Most writing is
    original (i.e., use of own
    words and proper
    paraphrasing).

    13 to >10.0 pts
    Proficient

    Writing is somewhat clear
    and organized with some
    MUGS errors or there is an
    underuse of original writing
    (i.e., use of own words and
    proper paraphrasing).

    10 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Writing is unclear and/or
    disorganized and/or
    contains many MUGS
    errors or most writing
    comes from outside
    sources (i.e., underuse of
    original writing, overuse of
    directly quoted content).

    **## Week4_LearningResources_PsychologySeminar-Winter2024.pdf**

    LEARNING RESOURCES

    Required Resources

    APA STYLE
    American Psychological Association. (2019, October). About APA style
    (https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style) . https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style
    Walden University. (2021). APA basics checklist
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist
    Note: This interactive tutorial teaches the basics of APA style. It will take you approximately 20
    minutes to complete this tutorial.

    Walden University, LLC. (2021). APA tutorial [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    AVOIDING PLAGIARISM
    Note: You will complete the following two Writing Center plagiarism modules as part of this
    week's Assignment 1.

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding overt plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)
    [Interactive
    media].https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548803
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding passive plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)
    [Interactive
    media]https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548804

    Walden University, LLC. (2023). Incorporating evidence into your writing (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html) . [Interactive media]. Walden
    University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND ORGANIZATION
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Grammarly: Overview
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly
    Walden University. (2021). Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL plan)
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    WEEK 2 LEARNING ACTIVITY—USING CRITICAL THINKING
    STRATEGIES TO IDENTIFY SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND
    COGNITIVE BIAS

    Note: Review this interactive media first presented in Week 2.
    Walden University, LLC. (2021). Using critical thinking strategies to identify scientific
    evidence and cognitive bias [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    **## Week4_Assignment3.pdf**

    Due Sunday by 10:59pm
    Points 70
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586

    Recall the Week 2 Learning Activity where you categorized a series of statements as value, anecdote, or
    evidence statements. You can review the activity in this week’s Learning Resources if you wish. Recall
    that value and anecdote statements are based on personal beliefs, experiences, or observations and
    have no scientific credibility. Evidence statements do have scientific credibility because they are based
    on scientific research. When you are responding to Discussions or writing papers for Assignments, it is
    important to use evidence statements to support your ideas and arguments with credible scientific
    research. It also is important to know how to paraphrase the evidence statements and accurately cite
    and reference the original sources.

    For this Assignment, you will build upon the skills you practiced in Weeks 2 and 3 by reading a journal
    article and then writing evidence statements to support value and anecdote statements. You will also
    practice paraphrasing, citing, and referencing your sources using APA style.

    WRITING EVIDENCE STATEMENTS

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604)

    Revisit the interactive media, “Using Critical Thinking Strategies to Identify Scientific Evidence and
    Cognitive Bias.” Review the definitions and examples of value, anecdote, and evidence statements.
    Reflect on what you learned in Week 3 about how to read journal articles and what you learned this
    week about how to effectively paraphrase sources.
    Review the article, “Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL Plan).” Consider how you could use the MEAL
    plan strategy to organize your writing.
    Review the Learning Resources on APA style. Pay particular attention to how to format citations and
    journal article references.
    Review the following article and the example of a completed assignment template to help you
    understand how to complete this week’s assignment. Pay particular attention to how the author of the
    example template wrote evidence statements to support the value and anecdote statements, wrote a
    summary of the article using the MEAL Plan strategy, and cited and referenced the article using APA
    style. You will use a different article and template to complete your Week 4 Assignment 2; these
    files are here for you to use only as guiding examples.

    Go to the Announcements area of the classroom to find your assigned article and blank template for
    this Assignment. Read the assigned article and complete the Assignment using the specific instructions
    in the template. Remember to apply what you learned about effectively paraphrasing and citing and
    referencing sources using APA Style.

    Marrs, H., Barb, M. R., & Ruggiero, J. C. (2007). Self-reported influences on psychology major
    choice and personality (https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-
    18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200) . Individual Differences Research,
    5(4), 289–299.

    Document: Week 4 Assignment 3 Template Example (PDF)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    TO PREPARE:

    BY DAY 7

    ARTICLE AND EXAMPLE FOR WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 3

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_2000_Week4_Assignment3_Rubric

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK4Assgn3_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    10 pts

    10 pts

    30 pts

    5 pts

    Value
    Statement
    Evidence

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Evidence statement
    supports the value
    statement with information
    from the article and includes
    citations where needed.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient

    Evidence statement either
    does not support the value
    statement with information
    from the article or does not
    include citations where
    needed.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Evidence statement neither
    supports the value
    statement with information
    from the article nor
    includes citations where
    needed.

    Anecdote
    Statement
    Evidence

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Evidence statement
    supports the anecdote
    statement with information
    from the article and includes
    citations where needed.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient

    Evidence statement either
    does not support the
    anecdote statement with
    information from the article or
    does not include citations
    where needed.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Evidence statement neither
    supports the anecdote
    statement with information
    from the article nor
    includes citations where
    needed.

    MEAL Plan
    Summary

    30 to >26.0 pts
    Exemplary
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes all four
    required components (Main
    Idea, Evidence, Analysis,
    Lead Out) and citations
    where needed.

    26 to >20.0 pts
    Proficient
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes some of
    the four required components
    (Main Idea, Evidence,
    Analysis, Lead Out) and/or
    misses some citations where
    needed.

    20 to >0 pts
    Developing
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes few of
    the four required
    components (Main Idea,
    Evidence, Analysis, Lead
    Out) and/or misses most
    citations where needed.

    APA Style
    Reference

    5 to >4.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Few or no APA style
    errors.

    4 to >3.0 pts
    Proficient

    Several APA style
    errors.

    3 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Many APA style errors or reference not
    attempted.

    Total Points: 70

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    15 pts

    Quality of
    Writing

    15 to >13.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Writing is clear and
    organized with few or no
    errors in mechanics, usage,
    grammar, or spelling
    (MUGS). Most writing is
    original (i.e., use of own
    words and proper
    paraphrasing).

    13 to >10.0 pts
    Proficient

    Writing is somewhat clear
    and organized with some
    MUGS errors or there is an
    underuse of original writing
    (i.e., use of own words and
    proper paraphrasing).

    10 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Writing is unclear and/or
    disorganized and/or
    contains many MUGS
    errors or most writing
    comes from outside
    sources (i.e., underuse of
    original writing, overuse of
    directly quoted content).

    **## Week4_LearningResources_PsychologySeminar-Winter2024.pdf**

    LEARNING RESOURCES

    Required Resources

    APA STYLE
    American Psychological Association. (2019, October). About APA style
    (https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style) . https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style
    Walden University. (2021). APA basics checklist
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist
    Note: This interactive tutorial teaches the basics of APA style. It will take you approximately 20
    minutes to complete this tutorial.

    Walden University, LLC. (2021). APA tutorial [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    AVOIDING PLAGIARISM
    Note: You will complete the following two Writing Center plagiarism modules as part of this
    week's Assignment 1.

    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding overt plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)
    [Interactive
    media].https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548803
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding passive plagiarism
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)
    [Interactive
    media]https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-
    8548804

    Walden University, LLC. (2023). Incorporating evidence into your writing (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html) . [Interactive media]. Walden
    University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND ORGANIZATION
    Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Grammarly: Overview
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly
    Walden University. (2021). Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL plan)
    (https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization) .
    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style](https://apastyle.apa.org/about-apa-style)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/APA/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548803)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/modules/plagiarism#s-lg-box-8548804)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3001/iew/index.html)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paragraphs/organization)

    WEEK 2 LEARNING ACTIVITY—USING CRITICAL THINKING
    STRATEGIES TO IDENTIFY SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND
    COGNITIVE BIAS

    Note: Review this interactive media first presented in Week 2.
    Walden University, LLC. (2021). Using critical thinking strategies to identify scientific
    evidence and cognitive bias [Interactive media] (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html) . Walden University Canvas.
    https://waldenu.instructure.com

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2000/UCT/index.html)

    **## Week4_Assignment3.pdf**

    Due Sunday by 10:59pm
    Points 70
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586

    Recall the Week 2 Learning Activity where you categorized a series of statements as value, anecdote, or
    evidence statements. You can review the activity in this week’s Learning Resources if you wish. Recall
    that value and anecdote statements are based on personal beliefs, experiences, or observations and
    have no scientific credibility. Evidence statements do have scientific credibility because they are based
    on scientific research. When you are responding to Discussions or writing papers for Assignments, it is
    important to use evidence statements to support your ideas and arguments with credible scientific
    research. It also is important to know how to paraphrase the evidence statements and accurately cite
    and reference the original sources.

    For this Assignment, you will build upon the skills you practiced in Weeks 2 and 3 by reading a journal
    article and then writing evidence statements to support value and anecdote statements. You will also
    practice paraphrasing, citing, and referencing your sources using APA style.

    WRITING EVIDENCE STATEMENTS

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984586)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/modules/items/5984604)

    Revisit the interactive media, “Using Critical Thinking Strategies to Identify Scientific Evidence and
    Cognitive Bias.” Review the definitions and examples of value, anecdote, and evidence statements.
    Reflect on what you learned in Week 3 about how to read journal articles and what you learned this
    week about how to effectively paraphrase sources.
    Review the article, “Paragraphs: Organization (MEAL Plan).” Consider how you could use the MEAL
    plan strategy to organize your writing.
    Review the Learning Resources on APA style. Pay particular attention to how to format citations and
    journal article references.
    Review the following article and the example of a completed assignment template to help you
    understand how to complete this week’s assignment. Pay particular attention to how the author of the
    example template wrote evidence statements to support the value and anecdote statements, wrote a
    summary of the article using the MEAL Plan strategy, and cited and referenced the article using APA
    style. You will use a different article and template to complete your Week 4 Assignment 2; these
    files are here for you to use only as guiding examples.

    Go to the Announcements area of the classroom to find your assigned article and blank template for
    this Assignment. Read the assigned article and complete the Assignment using the specific instructions
    in the template. Remember to apply what you learned about effectively paraphrasing and citing and
    referencing sources using APA Style.

    Marrs, H., Barb, M. R., & Ruggiero, J. C. (2007). Self-reported influences on psychology major
    choice and personality (https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-
    18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200) . Individual Differences Research,
    5(4), 289–299.

    Document: Week 4 Assignment 3 Template Example (PDF)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    TO PREPARE:

    BY DAY 7

    ARTICLE AND EXAMPLE FOR WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 3

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-18918-005&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879?wrap=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/151568/files/11709879/download?download_frd=1)

    PSYC_2000_Week4_Assignment3_Rubric

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK4Assgn3_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    10 pts

    10 pts

    30 pts

    5 pts

    Value
    Statement
    Evidence

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Evidence statement
    supports the value
    statement with information
    from the article and includes
    citations where needed.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient

    Evidence statement either
    does not support the value
    statement with information
    from the article or does not
    include citations where
    needed.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Evidence statement neither
    supports the value
    statement with information
    from the article nor
    includes citations where
    needed.

    Anecdote
    Statement
    Evidence

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Evidence statement
    supports the anecdote
    statement with information
    from the article and includes
    citations where needed.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient

    Evidence statement either
    does not support the
    anecdote statement with
    information from the article or
    does not include citations
    where needed.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Evidence statement neither
    supports the anecdote
    statement with information
    from the article nor
    includes citations where
    needed.

    MEAL Plan
    Summary

    30 to >26.0 pts
    Exemplary
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes all four
    required components (Main
    Idea, Evidence, Analysis,
    Lead Out) and citations
    where needed.

    26 to >20.0 pts
    Proficient
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes some of
    the four required components
    (Main Idea, Evidence,
    Analysis, Lead Out) and/or
    misses some citations where
    needed.

    20 to >0 pts
    Developing
    Summary paragraph
    sufficiently includes few of
    the four required
    components (Main Idea,
    Evidence, Analysis, Lead
    Out) and/or misses most
    citations where needed.

    APA Style
    Reference

    5 to >4.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Few or no APA style
    errors.

    4 to >3.0 pts
    Proficient

    Several APA style
    errors.

    3 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Many APA style errors or reference not
    attempted.

    Total Points: 70

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    15 pts

    Quality of
    Writing

    15 to >13.0 pts
    Exemplary

    Writing is clear and
    organized with few or no
    errors in mechanics, usage,
    grammar, or spelling
    (MUGS). Most writing is
    original (i.e., use of own
    words and proper
    paraphrasing).

    13 to >10.0 pts
    Proficient

    Writing is somewhat clear
    and organized with some
    MUGS errors or there is an
    underuse of original writing
    (i.e., use of own words and
    proper paraphrasing).

    10 to >0 pts
    Developing

    Writing is unclear and/or
    disorganized and/or
    contains many MUGS
    errors or most writing
    comes from outside
    sources (i.e., underuse of
    original writing, overuse of
    directly quoted content).

  • [Solved] ARTICLE REVIEW

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need help completing – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx – SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF – OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf **## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx** ## Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully ![Previous ite…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need help completing

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx

    – SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF
    – OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx**

    ## Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    ![Previous item](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/article-review-20879927) Page 4 of 4

    Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **image1.gif**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10172427)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10172429)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10172429)

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx**

    ## Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    ![Previous item](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/article-review-20879927) Page 4 of 4

    Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **image1.gif**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10172427)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10172429)

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions_PleaseReadCarefully.docx**

    ## Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    ![Previous item](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/article-review-20879927) Page 4 of 4

    Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **image1.gif**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.PDF**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10172427)

    **OnlineCounselingArticle1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/onlinecounselingarticle1-pdf-10172429)

  • [Solved] Principle of Ethics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## assignment4principlesofethics.docx **## assignment4principlesofethics.docx** · Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook . Instructions For this week. Do this in the form of powerpoint. **Option 1:** The first option is to name and describe in detai…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## assignment4principlesofethics.docx

    **## assignment4principlesofethics.docx**

    · Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook .

    Instructions

    For this week. Do this in the form of powerpoint.

    **Option 1:** The first option is to name and describe in detail a key specific and recent healthcare technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your approach to what a utilitarian and ethical egoist would say (each independently). Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.

    · Slide length: 4 slides (not including title slide, conclusion slide, or references slide)

    · Title slide

    · Conclusion slide

    · References slide (minimum of 2 scholarly sources cited in APA format; not narrated)

    American Psychological Association. (2020).
    _Publication manual of the American Psychological Association_ (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.

    **## assignment4principlesofethics.docx**

    · Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook .

    Instructions

    For this week. Do this in the form of powerpoint.

    **Option 1:** The first option is to name and describe in detail a key specific and recent healthcare technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your approach to what a utilitarian and ethical egoist would say (each independently). Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.

    · Slide length: 4 slides (not including title slide, conclusion slide, or references slide)

    · Title slide

    · Conclusion slide

    · References slide (minimum of 2 scholarly sources cited in APA format; not narrated)

    American Psychological Association. (2020).
    _Publication manual of the American Psychological Association_ (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] critical thinking

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Topic: The Tuskegee Experiment Find information from your text and/or from other reputable sources. Provide a brief, yet thorough overview of the experiment and the ethical problems involved in the scenario. Cite your sources. Discuss which of the three major principles from the Belmont Report (1. R…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Topic:  The Tuskegee Experiment

    Find information from your text and/or from other reputable sources. Provide a brief, yet thorough overview of the experiment and the ethical problems involved in the scenario. Cite your sources.

    Discuss which of the three major principles from the Belmont Report (1. Respect for Persons, 2. Benficience, 3. Justice) are violated in the situation you chose. Discuss all that are applicable. This requires that you not only identify the principle but explain how/why it was violated.

    Discuss how the requirement of Informed Consent is essential to preventing the ethical issues you have identified and how it's requirement in your chosen situation would now protect a participant.

    Resources

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzNANZnoiRs

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtLPd2u4DiA

    – [\
    \
    McBride5e_PPT031.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mcbride5e-ppt031-pptx "McBride5e_PPT031.pptx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Article Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Article – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Instructionsarticlereview.docx – SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf **## Instructionsarticlereview.docx** Instructions for article review You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourse…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Article

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Instructionsarticlereview.docx

    – SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf

    **## Instructionsarticlereview.docx**

    Instructions for article review

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10173745)

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10173745)

    **## Instructionsarticlereview.docx**

    Instructions for article review

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10173745)

    **## Instructionsarticlereview.docx**

    Instructions for article review

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    **SelfInjuryandConfidentiality2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/selfinjuryandconfidentiality2-pdf-10173745)

  • [Solved] One Student Response (250-300 Words)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Respond by Day 6** to at least **one** of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways: – Ask a probing question. – Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting. – Offer and support an opinion. – Validate an idea with your own experience. – Make a suggestion. – Expa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Respond by Day 6** to at least **one** of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

    – Ask a probing question.
    – Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
    – Offer and support an opinion.
    – Validate an idea with your own experience.
    – Make a suggestion.
    – Expand on your colleague’s posting.

    – 2 years ago
    – 0.25