[Solved] Signature

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**files (2)**

– ## Template-PHIL341SignatureAssignment10182024.docx

– ## Untitleddocument54.pdf

**## Template-PHIL341SignatureAssignment10182024.docx**

2

2

**Title of Video You Analyzed**

Your Name Here

West Coast University

PHIL 341: Critical Reasoning

Faculty Name

The Date Here

**Week 8 Signature Assignment**

**Introduction**

Begin by providing a brief introduction that specifies the TedTalk you selected and general overview of the video. In your paper you will want to reference concepts and information from our textbook. Use the following format should follow the format (Moore & Parker, 2021) for paraphrasing and (Moore & Parker, 2021, p. #) for direct quotes. When referencing class videos, use (Instructor name, n.d.) for paraphrasing, and when quoting from a video, include the specific time stamp where the information can be located, such as (Instructor name, n.d., 1:21). If there is no timeline provided on a video, it is best to paraphrase rather than quote. In APA format, if you are citing sources by the same author and with the same publication year, you differentiate them by adding lowercase letters (a, b, c, etc.) after the publication year within the in-text citations. This allows you to distinguish between the sources in your text and match them with the corresponding full citations in your reference list. For example:

– (Author, Yeara)

– (Author, Yearb)

Make sure to list these sources alphabetically in your reference list, organized by the lowercase letter assigned.

**The Argument and Syllogism**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your own words. Be sure to include details and the main points the speaker used to make the argument.

Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses to make the overall argument:

·
**Major Premise:** Write the major premise in one to two sentences. A major premise is the main idea of an argument. It's the big, general statement at the beginning that sets the stage for the whole discussion. From there, more specific details are shared, leading to a final conclusion. Think of the major premise as an overarching statement that provides the context for the argument, guiding the development of the rest of the points and ideas.

·
**Minor Premise:** Write the minor premise in one to two sentences. The minor premise is often a specific example that helps support the main idea in an argument. It adds details that show how the big idea applies to a particular situation. By giving specific examples and details, the minor premise helps strengthen the overall argument. It works together with the major premise to build a logical case that leads to a final conclusion.

·
**Conclusion:** Write a conclusion in one to two sentences. A conclusion is the outcome of a logical argument derived from the premises presented. It is the final statement based on the evidence in the major and minor premises.

**Testing the Syllogism**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Based on the syllogism presented in Part 1 B, is this argument employing inductive or deductive reasoning? Support your choice with evidence. If the argument is deductive, analyze your syllogism from Part 1 B in terms of logical validity and soundness. Provide an evaluation that not only determines if the syllogism is both valid and sound, but also explains the reasoning behind your decision. If the argument utilizes an inductive approach, evaluate your syllogism from Part 1 B based on its strength as an inductive argument. Provide a critique that shows whether the syllogism is stronger or weaker, and clarify the rationale for your assessment.

**Rhetorical Appeals**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and what information from the video has led you to your choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or ideas and explain their connections to each type of appeal.  Also, indicate what effect the use of these appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

**Rhetorical Devices**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device from our textbook that was found in the video you selected. Be sure define the rhetorical device and demonstrate how o why the source employs them. REMEMBER that ethos, pathos, and logos are rhetorical appeals, NOT devices. This is asking about rhetorical
_devices_.

**Logical Fallacies**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify at least one specific logical fallacy from our textbook that was found in the video you selected. Be sure to define the fallacy and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether you think the use of the logical fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that each one has on the argument.

**Moral Reasoning**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your topic? Choose from the following: Utilitarianism, Deontology, Virtue Ethics, Moral Relativism, or Cultural Relativism. Information about these ethical perspectives in located in Chapter 12 and you can also find more information in the study guide located in the Doc Sharing link under Modules. Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose from the list above and demonstrate how or why the source employs them.  Also, discuss whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

**Reaction and Reflection**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph that offers your position on the argument presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking skills to explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or ineffective and why.

**Conclusion**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph that explores the positive implications and negative consequences of the critical reasoning concepts utilized in both your paper and the video. This paragraph should be comprehensive enough to showcase how these concepts were applied and their impacts. This is the conclusion to your paper and should not include any new materials or concepts.

**References**

Moore, B.N., & Parker, R. (2021).
_Critical thinking_ (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Speaker's Last Name, First Initial. (date of TED Talk). Title of TED Talk [Video]. TED Conferences. URL

Instructor last name, first initial (N.D.) Week # and Video name in Canvas. [Video]. Canvas@WCU.
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/)

References should be listed in alphabetical order

APA 7 is different from APA 6. Here is a website covering some key differences:
[https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-seventh-edition-changes/](https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-seventh-edition-changes/).

**## Untitleddocument54.pdf**

Write as Freshman in college

Use template provided

Instructions:

The Signature Assignment for this course combines all the concepts you have explored
in this term. In this assignment, you will choose one of the TED Talks below and form a
response based on the provided guidance using the provided template

Download the provided template

. As you respond to the questions, you will be expected to connect the concepts
covered in this course to the information in your chosen video.

As you develop your Signature Assignment, it is a mandatory requirement to support
your logic with in-text citations from our textbook. These citations are essential for
substantiating your claims and demonstrating your understanding of the course
concepts.

Please ensure that you use the template and follow APA format for your paper,
including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page. Incorrect or missing
citations may impact your grade, so be diligent in citing the textbook appropriately.

Please choose ONE of the following TED Talks to respond to.

● TED. (2019, October). Ethics: Yes, Even When Nobody is Watching / Dawne
Ware

● Links to an external site.
● [Video]. TED Talk: Ethics: Yes, Even When Nobody is Watching
● Links to an external site.
●
● TED. (2017, October). Money and Morals: The Art of Philosophic Investing /

Henrik Syse [Video]. TED Talk: Money and Morals: The Art of Philosphic
Investing

● Links to an external site.
●
● TED. (2021, August). AI Isn't as Smart as You Think–But It Could Be / Jeff

Dean [Video]. TED Talk: AI Isn't as Smart as You Think– But It Could Be
● Links to an external site.
●

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119?wrap=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119?wrap=1)

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1)

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be](https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be](https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be)

For each number below, complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to
demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter of the class.

1. The Argument and Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and
thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your
understanding of the course concepts indicated.

A. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your
own words. Be sure to include details and the main
points the speaker used to make the argument.

B. Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses
to make the overall argument:

■ Major Premise
■ Minor Premise
■ Conclusion

2. Testing the Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough

paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the
course concepts indicated.

A. Based upon the syllogism (your answer to Part 1. B),
does this argument demonstrate inductive or deductive
reasoning? Provide support for your choice. Be sure to
only choose deductive OR inductive; you cannot choose
both or neither.

B. If the argument is deductive, test your syllogism (your
answers to Part 1. B) in terms of logical validity and
soundness. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is
valid and sound but also show how/how not or why/why
not. If the argument is inductive, test your syllogism (your
answers from Part 1. B) in terms of being a stronger or
weaker inductive argument. Be sure to not only tell if the
syllogism is stronger or weaker but also show how or
why.

3. Rhetorical Appeals: Complete a thoughtful and thorough
paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the
course concepts indicated.

A. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos,
pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and
what information from the video has led you to your
choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or
ideas and explain their connections to each type of

appeal. Also, indicate what effect the use of these
appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

4. Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies: Complete a thoughtful
and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your
understanding of the course concepts indicated.

A. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device and one
specific logical fallacy in the way this topic is presented.
Be sure to define the rhetorical device and fallacy and
demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also,
discuss whether you think the use of each device and
fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that
each one has on the argument.

B. NOTE: Remember, ethos, pathos, and logos are
rhetorical appeals, NOT devices, so they are not what is
being asked here. This is asking about rhetorical
devices.

5. Moral Reasoning: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph
long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course
concepts indicated.
A. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your
topic? Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure
to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose and
demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss
whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and
what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

6. Reaction and Reflection: Offer your position on the argument
presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking
skills, explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or
ineffective, and why.

7. Conclusion: What are the positive implications and negative
consequences for the critical reasoning concepts that were used
throughout your paper and in the video?

When completing this assignment, please keep the following in mind:

● Use the provided template.

● First and third person (I, we, her, him, they) are fine for this assignment, but
do not use second person (you, your).

● Include a title page, indicating which topic you chose.
● Adhere to basic APA formatting, including:

○ 12-point Times New Roman font
○ Double-spaced text
○ 1-inch margins throughout

● Support your logic with in-text citations from our textbook.
● Cite any outside sources that you used to support your ideas in proper APA

format with in-text citations and references.
● Be sure to review the associated rubric for more guidance on the content that

your response is expected to contain.

**## Untitleddocument54.pdf**

Write as Freshman in college

Use template provided

Instructions:

The Signature Assignment for this course combines all the concepts you have explored
in this term. In this assignment, you will choose one of the TED Talks below and form a
response based on the provided guidance using the provided template

Download the provided template

. As you respond to the questions, you will be expected to connect the concepts
covered in this course to the information in your chosen video.

As you develop your Signature Assignment, it is a mandatory requirement to support
your logic with in-text citations from our textbook. These citations are essential for
substantiating your claims and demonstrating your understanding of the course
concepts.

Please ensure that you use the template and follow APA format for your paper,
including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page. Incorrect or missing
citations may impact your grade, so be diligent in citing the textbook appropriately.

Please choose ONE of the following TED Talks to respond to.

● TED. (2019, October). Ethics: Yes, Even When Nobody is Watching / Dawne
Ware

● Links to an external site.
● [Video]. TED Talk: Ethics: Yes, Even When Nobody is Watching
● Links to an external site.
●
● TED. (2017, October). Money and Morals: The Art of Philosophic Investing /

Henrik Syse [Video]. TED Talk: Money and Morals: The Art of Philosphic
Investing

● Links to an external site.
●
● TED. (2021, August). AI Isn't as Smart as You Think–But It Could Be / Jeff

Dean [Video]. TED Talk: AI Isn't as Smart as You Think– But It Could Be
● Links to an external site.
●

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119?wrap=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119?wrap=1)

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1)

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be](https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be](https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be)

For each number below, complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to
demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter of the class.

1. The Argument and Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and
thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your
understanding of the course concepts indicated.

A. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your
own words. Be sure to include details and the main
points the speaker used to make the argument.

B. Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses
to make the overall argument:

■ Major Premise
■ Minor Premise
■ Conclusion

2. Testing the Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough

paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the
course concepts indicated.

A. Based upon the syllogism (your answer to Part 1. B),
does this argument demonstrate inductive or deductive
reasoning? Provide support for your choice. Be sure to
only choose deductive OR inductive; you cannot choose
both or neither.

B. If the argument is deductive, test your syllogism (your
answers to Part 1. B) in terms of logical validity and
soundness. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is
valid and sound but also show how/how not or why/why
not. If the argument is inductive, test your syllogism (your
answers from Part 1. B) in terms of being a stronger or
weaker inductive argument. Be sure to not only tell if the
syllogism is stronger or weaker but also show how or
why.

3. Rhetorical Appeals: Complete a thoughtful and thorough
paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the
course concepts indicated.

A. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos,
pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and
what information from the video has led you to your
choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or
ideas and explain their connections to each type of

appeal. Also, indicate what effect the use of these
appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

4. Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies: Complete a thoughtful
and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your
understanding of the course concepts indicated.

A. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device and one
specific logical fallacy in the way this topic is presented.
Be sure to define the rhetorical device and fallacy and
demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also,
discuss whether you think the use of each device and
fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that
each one has on the argument.

B. NOTE: Remember, ethos, pathos, and logos are
rhetorical appeals, NOT devices, so they are not what is
being asked here. This is asking about rhetorical
devices.

5. Moral Reasoning: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph
long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course
concepts indicated.
A. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your
topic? Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure
to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose and
demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss
whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and
what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

6. Reaction and Reflection: Offer your position on the argument
presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking
skills, explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or
ineffective, and why.

7. Conclusion: What are the positive implications and negative
consequences for the critical reasoning concepts that were used
throughout your paper and in the video?

When completing this assignment, please keep the following in mind:

● Use the provided template.

● First and third person (I, we, her, him, they) are fine for this assignment, but
do not use second person (you, your).

● Include a title page, indicating which topic you chose.
● Adhere to basic APA formatting, including:

○ 12-point Times New Roman font
○ Double-spaced text
○ 1-inch margins throughout

● Support your logic with in-text citations from our textbook.
● Cite any outside sources that you used to support your ideas in proper APA

format with in-text citations and references.
● Be sure to review the associated rubric for more guidance on the content that

your response is expected to contain.

**## Template-PHIL341SignatureAssignment10182024.docx**

2

2

**Title of Video You Analyzed**

Your Name Here

West Coast University

PHIL 341: Critical Reasoning

Faculty Name

The Date Here

**Week 8 Signature Assignment**

**Introduction**

Begin by providing a brief introduction that specifies the TedTalk you selected and general overview of the video. In your paper you will want to reference concepts and information from our textbook. Use the following format should follow the format (Moore & Parker, 2021) for paraphrasing and (Moore & Parker, 2021, p. #) for direct quotes. When referencing class videos, use (Instructor name, n.d.) for paraphrasing, and when quoting from a video, include the specific time stamp where the information can be located, such as (Instructor name, n.d., 1:21). If there is no timeline provided on a video, it is best to paraphrase rather than quote. In APA format, if you are citing sources by the same author and with the same publication year, you differentiate them by adding lowercase letters (a, b, c, etc.) after the publication year within the in-text citations. This allows you to distinguish between the sources in your text and match them with the corresponding full citations in your reference list. For example:

– (Author, Yeara)

– (Author, Yearb)

Make sure to list these sources alphabetically in your reference list, organized by the lowercase letter assigned.

**The Argument and Syllogism**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your own words. Be sure to include details and the main points the speaker used to make the argument.

Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses to make the overall argument:

·
**Major Premise:** Write the major premise in one to two sentences. A major premise is the main idea of an argument. It's the big, general statement at the beginning that sets the stage for the whole discussion. From there, more specific details are shared, leading to a final conclusion. Think of the major premise as an overarching statement that provides the context for the argument, guiding the development of the rest of the points and ideas.

·
**Minor Premise:** Write the minor premise in one to two sentences. The minor premise is often a specific example that helps support the main idea in an argument. It adds details that show how the big idea applies to a particular situation. By giving specific examples and details, the minor premise helps strengthen the overall argument. It works together with the major premise to build a logical case that leads to a final conclusion.

·
**Conclusion:** Write a conclusion in one to two sentences. A conclusion is the outcome of a logical argument derived from the premises presented. It is the final statement based on the evidence in the major and minor premises.

**Testing the Syllogism**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Based on the syllogism presented in Part 1 B, is this argument employing inductive or deductive reasoning? Support your choice with evidence. If the argument is deductive, analyze your syllogism from Part 1 B in terms of logical validity and soundness. Provide an evaluation that not only determines if the syllogism is both valid and sound, but also explains the reasoning behind your decision. If the argument utilizes an inductive approach, evaluate your syllogism from Part 1 B based on its strength as an inductive argument. Provide a critique that shows whether the syllogism is stronger or weaker, and clarify the rationale for your assessment.

**Rhetorical Appeals**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and what information from the video has led you to your choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or ideas and explain their connections to each type of appeal.  Also, indicate what effect the use of these appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

**Rhetorical Devices**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device from our textbook that was found in the video you selected. Be sure define the rhetorical device and demonstrate how o why the source employs them. REMEMBER that ethos, pathos, and logos are rhetorical appeals, NOT devices. This is asking about rhetorical
_devices_.

**Logical Fallacies**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify at least one specific logical fallacy from our textbook that was found in the video you selected. Be sure to define the fallacy and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether you think the use of the logical fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that each one has on the argument.

**Moral Reasoning**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your topic? Choose from the following: Utilitarianism, Deontology, Virtue Ethics, Moral Relativism, or Cultural Relativism. Information about these ethical perspectives in located in Chapter 12 and you can also find more information in the study guide located in the Doc Sharing link under Modules. Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose from the list above and demonstrate how or why the source employs them.  Also, discuss whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

**Reaction and Reflection**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph that offers your position on the argument presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking skills to explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or ineffective and why.

**Conclusion**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph that explores the positive implications and negative consequences of the critical reasoning concepts utilized in both your paper and the video. This paragraph should be comprehensive enough to showcase how these concepts were applied and their impacts. This is the conclusion to your paper and should not include any new materials or concepts.

**References**

Moore, B.N., & Parker, R. (2021).
_Critical thinking_ (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Speaker's Last Name, First Initial. (date of TED Talk). Title of TED Talk [Video]. TED Conferences. URL

Instructor last name, first initial (N.D.) Week # and Video name in Canvas. [Video]. Canvas@WCU.
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/)

References should be listed in alphabetical order

APA 7 is different from APA 6. Here is a website covering some key differences:
[https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-seventh-edition-changes/](https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-seventh-edition-changes/).

**## Untitleddocument54.pdf**

Write as Freshman in college

Use template provided

Instructions:

The Signature Assignment for this course combines all the concepts you have explored
in this term. In this assignment, you will choose one of the TED Talks below and form a
response based on the provided guidance using the provided template

Download the provided template

. As you respond to the questions, you will be expected to connect the concepts
covered in this course to the information in your chosen video.

As you develop your Signature Assignment, it is a mandatory requirement to support
your logic with in-text citations from our textbook. These citations are essential for
substantiating your claims and demonstrating your understanding of the course
concepts.

Please ensure that you use the template and follow APA format for your paper,
including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page. Incorrect or missing
citations may impact your grade, so be diligent in citing the textbook appropriately.

Please choose ONE of the following TED Talks to respond to.

● TED. (2019, October). Ethics: Yes, Even When Nobody is Watching / Dawne
Ware

● Links to an external site.
● [Video]. TED Talk: Ethics: Yes, Even When Nobody is Watching
● Links to an external site.
●
● TED. (2017, October). Money and Morals: The Art of Philosophic Investing /

Henrik Syse [Video]. TED Talk: Money and Morals: The Art of Philosphic
Investing

● Links to an external site.
●
● TED. (2021, August). AI Isn't as Smart as You Think–But It Could Be / Jeff

Dean [Video]. TED Talk: AI Isn't as Smart as You Think– But It Could Be
● Links to an external site.
●

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119?wrap=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119?wrap=1)

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1)

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be](https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be](https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be)

For each number below, complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to
demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter of the class.

1. The Argument and Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and
thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your
understanding of the course concepts indicated.

A. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your
own words. Be sure to include details and the main
points the speaker used to make the argument.

B. Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses
to make the overall argument:

■ Major Premise
■ Minor Premise
■ Conclusion

2. Testing the Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough

paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the
course concepts indicated.

A. Based upon the syllogism (your answer to Part 1. B),
does this argument demonstrate inductive or deductive
reasoning? Provide support for your choice. Be sure to
only choose deductive OR inductive; you cannot choose
both or neither.

B. If the argument is deductive, test your syllogism (your
answers to Part 1. B) in terms of logical validity and
soundness. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is
valid and sound but also show how/how not or why/why
not. If the argument is inductive, test your syllogism (your
answers from Part 1. B) in terms of being a stronger or
weaker inductive argument. Be sure to not only tell if the
syllogism is stronger or weaker but also show how or
why.

3. Rhetorical Appeals: Complete a thoughtful and thorough
paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the
course concepts indicated.

A. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos,
pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and
what information from the video has led you to your
choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or
ideas and explain their connections to each type of

appeal. Also, indicate what effect the use of these
appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

4. Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies: Complete a thoughtful
and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your
understanding of the course concepts indicated.

A. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device and one
specific logical fallacy in the way this topic is presented.
Be sure to define the rhetorical device and fallacy and
demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also,
discuss whether you think the use of each device and
fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that
each one has on the argument.

B. NOTE: Remember, ethos, pathos, and logos are
rhetorical appeals, NOT devices, so they are not what is
being asked here. This is asking about rhetorical
devices.

5. Moral Reasoning: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph
long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course
concepts indicated.
A. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your
topic? Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure
to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose and
demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss
whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and
what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

6. Reaction and Reflection: Offer your position on the argument
presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking
skills, explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or
ineffective, and why.

7. Conclusion: What are the positive implications and negative
consequences for the critical reasoning concepts that were used
throughout your paper and in the video?

When completing this assignment, please keep the following in mind:

● Use the provided template.

● First and third person (I, we, her, him, they) are fine for this assignment, but
do not use second person (you, your).

● Include a title page, indicating which topic you chose.
● Adhere to basic APA formatting, including:

○ 12-point Times New Roman font
○ Double-spaced text
○ 1-inch margins throughout

● Support your logic with in-text citations from our textbook.
● Cite any outside sources that you used to support your ideas in proper APA

format with in-text citations and references.
● Be sure to review the associated rubric for more guidance on the content that

your response is expected to contain.

**## Template-PHIL341SignatureAssignment10182024.docx**

2

2

**Title of Video You Analyzed**

Your Name Here

West Coast University

PHIL 341: Critical Reasoning

Faculty Name

The Date Here

**Week 8 Signature Assignment**

**Introduction**

Begin by providing a brief introduction that specifies the TedTalk you selected and general overview of the video. In your paper you will want to reference concepts and information from our textbook. Use the following format should follow the format (Moore & Parker, 2021) for paraphrasing and (Moore & Parker, 2021, p. #) for direct quotes. When referencing class videos, use (Instructor name, n.d.) for paraphrasing, and when quoting from a video, include the specific time stamp where the information can be located, such as (Instructor name, n.d., 1:21). If there is no timeline provided on a video, it is best to paraphrase rather than quote. In APA format, if you are citing sources by the same author and with the same publication year, you differentiate them by adding lowercase letters (a, b, c, etc.) after the publication year within the in-text citations. This allows you to distinguish between the sources in your text and match them with the corresponding full citations in your reference list. For example:

– (Author, Yeara)

– (Author, Yearb)

Make sure to list these sources alphabetically in your reference list, organized by the lowercase letter assigned.

**The Argument and Syllogism**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your own words. Be sure to include details and the main points the speaker used to make the argument.

Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses to make the overall argument:

·
**Major Premise:** Write the major premise in one to two sentences. A major premise is the main idea of an argument. It's the big, general statement at the beginning that sets the stage for the whole discussion. From there, more specific details are shared, leading to a final conclusion. Think of the major premise as an overarching statement that provides the context for the argument, guiding the development of the rest of the points and ideas.

·
**Minor Premise:** Write the minor premise in one to two sentences. The minor premise is often a specific example that helps support the main idea in an argument. It adds details that show how the big idea applies to a particular situation. By giving specific examples and details, the minor premise helps strengthen the overall argument. It works together with the major premise to build a logical case that leads to a final conclusion.

·
**Conclusion:** Write a conclusion in one to two sentences. A conclusion is the outcome of a logical argument derived from the premises presented. It is the final statement based on the evidence in the major and minor premises.

**Testing the Syllogism**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Based on the syllogism presented in Part 1 B, is this argument employing inductive or deductive reasoning? Support your choice with evidence. If the argument is deductive, analyze your syllogism from Part 1 B in terms of logical validity and soundness. Provide an evaluation that not only determines if the syllogism is both valid and sound, but also explains the reasoning behind your decision. If the argument utilizes an inductive approach, evaluate your syllogism from Part 1 B based on its strength as an inductive argument. Provide a critique that shows whether the syllogism is stronger or weaker, and clarify the rationale for your assessment.

**Rhetorical Appeals**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and what information from the video has led you to your choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or ideas and explain their connections to each type of appeal.  Also, indicate what effect the use of these appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

**Rhetorical Devices**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device from our textbook that was found in the video you selected. Be sure define the rhetorical device and demonstrate how o why the source employs them. REMEMBER that ethos, pathos, and logos are rhetorical appeals, NOT devices. This is asking about rhetorical
_devices_.

**Logical Fallacies**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify at least one specific logical fallacy from our textbook that was found in the video you selected. Be sure to define the fallacy and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether you think the use of the logical fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that each one has on the argument.

**Moral Reasoning**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your topic? Choose from the following: Utilitarianism, Deontology, Virtue Ethics, Moral Relativism, or Cultural Relativism. Information about these ethical perspectives in located in Chapter 12 and you can also find more information in the study guide located in the Doc Sharing link under Modules. Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose from the list above and demonstrate how or why the source employs them.  Also, discuss whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

**Reaction and Reflection**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph that offers your position on the argument presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking skills to explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or ineffective and why.

**Conclusion**

Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph that explores the positive implications and negative consequences of the critical reasoning concepts utilized in both your paper and the video. This paragraph should be comprehensive enough to showcase how these concepts were applied and their impacts. This is the conclusion to your paper and should not include any new materials or concepts.

**References**

Moore, B.N., & Parker, R. (2021).
_Critical thinking_ (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Speaker's Last Name, First Initial. (date of TED Talk). Title of TED Talk [Video]. TED Conferences. URL

Instructor last name, first initial (N.D.) Week # and Video name in Canvas. [Video]. Canvas@WCU.
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/)

References should be listed in alphabetical order

APA 7 is different from APA 6. Here is a website covering some key differences:
[https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-seventh-edition-changes/](https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-seventh-edition-changes/).

**## Untitleddocument54.pdf**

Write as Freshman in college

Use template provided

Instructions:

The Signature Assignment for this course combines all the concepts you have explored
in this term. In this assignment, you will choose one of the TED Talks below and form a
response based on the provided guidance using the provided template

Download the provided template

. As you respond to the questions, you will be expected to connect the concepts
covered in this course to the information in your chosen video.

As you develop your Signature Assignment, it is a mandatory requirement to support
your logic with in-text citations from our textbook. These citations are essential for
substantiating your claims and demonstrating your understanding of the course
concepts.

Please ensure that you use the template and follow APA format for your paper,
including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page. Incorrect or missing
citations may impact your grade, so be diligent in citing the textbook appropriately.

Please choose ONE of the following TED Talks to respond to.

● TED. (2019, October). Ethics: Yes, Even When Nobody is Watching / Dawne
Ware

● Links to an external site.
● [Video]. TED Talk: Ethics: Yes, Even When Nobody is Watching
● Links to an external site.
●
● TED. (2017, October). Money and Morals: The Art of Philosophic Investing /

Henrik Syse [Video]. TED Talk: Money and Morals: The Art of Philosphic
Investing

● Links to an external site.
●
● TED. (2021, August). AI Isn't as Smart as You Think–But It Could Be / Jeff

Dean [Video]. TED Talk: AI Isn't as Smart as You Think– But It Could Be
● Links to an external site.
●

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119?wrap=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119?wrap=1)

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1)

[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/80109/files/34517119/download?download_frd=1)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/dawne_ware_ethics_yes_even_when_nobody_is_watching?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en](https://www.ted.com/talks/henrik_syse_money_and_morals_the_art_of_philosophic_investing?subtitle=en)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be](https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be)

[https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be](https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_dean_ai_isn_t_as_smart_as_you_think_but_it_could_be)

For each number below, complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to
demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter of the class.

1. The Argument and Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and
thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your
understanding of the course concepts indicated.

A. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your
own words. Be sure to include details and the main
points the speaker used to make the argument.

B. Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses
to make the overall argument:

■ Major Premise
■ Minor Premise
■ Conclusion

2. Testing the Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough

paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the
course concepts indicated.

A. Based upon the syllogism (your answer to Part 1. B),
does this argument demonstrate inductive or deductive
reasoning? Provide support for your choice. Be sure to
only choose deductive OR inductive; you cannot choose
both or neither.

B. If the argument is deductive, test your syllogism (your
answers to Part 1. B) in terms of logical validity and
soundness. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is
valid and sound but also show how/how not or why/why
not. If the argument is inductive, test your syllogism (your
answers from Part 1. B) in terms of being a stronger or
weaker inductive argument. Be sure to not only tell if the
syllogism is stronger or weaker but also show how or
why.

3. Rhetorical Appeals: Complete a thoughtful and thorough
paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the
course concepts indicated.

A. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos,
pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and
what information from the video has led you to your
choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or
ideas and explain their connections to each type of

appeal. Also, indicate what effect the use of these
appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

4. Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies: Complete a thoughtful
and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your
understanding of the course concepts indicated.

A. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device and one
specific logical fallacy in the way this topic is presented.
Be sure to define the rhetorical device and fallacy and
demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also,
discuss whether you think the use of each device and
fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that
each one has on the argument.

B. NOTE: Remember, ethos, pathos, and logos are
rhetorical appeals, NOT devices, so they are not what is
being asked here. This is asking about rhetorical
devices.

5. Moral Reasoning: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph
long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course
concepts indicated.
A. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your
topic? Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure
to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose and
demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss
whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and
what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument.

6. Reaction and Reflection: Offer your position on the argument
presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking
skills, explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or
ineffective, and why.

7. Conclusion: What are the positive implications and negative
consequences for the critical reasoning concepts that were used
throughout your paper and in the video?

When completing this assignment, please keep the following in mind:

● Use the provided template.

● First and third person (I, we, her, him, they) are fine for this assignment, but
do not use second person (you, your).

● Include a title page, indicating which topic you chose.
● Adhere to basic APA formatting, including:

○ 12-point Times New Roman font
○ Double-spaced text
○ 1-inch margins throughout

● Support your logic with in-text citations from our textbook.
● Cite any outside sources that you used to support your ideas in proper APA

format with in-text citations and references.
● Be sure to review the associated rubric for more guidance on the content that

your response is expected to contain.