Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Human Resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help – ## TheFitOrganization.pdf – ## JWI556Week10LectureNotes.pdf – Week10Discussion556.jpeg **## TheFitOrganization.pdf** Copyright of Rotman Management is the property of Joseph L. Rotman School of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help

    – ## TheFitOrganization.pdf

    – ## JWI556Week10LectureNotes.pdf

    – Week10Discussion556.jpeg

    **## TheFitOrganization.pdf**

    Copyright of Rotman Management is the property of Joseph L. Rotman School of
    Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
    listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
    download, or email articles for individual use.

    **## JWI556Week10LectureNotes.pdf**

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 1 of 7

    JWI 556
    Leading Change by Putting People First

    Week Ten Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 2 of 7

    SUSTAINING THE CHANGE AND KEEPING PEOPLE FIRST

    What It Means

    Change is about innovation and growth, and if you’re going to keep on winning, it’s never done.
    Successful change leaders are those who can build a culture that embraces change as a way of
    life rather than viewing it as an ordeal that has to be survived. If you truly believe that people are
    the most important part of any organization, then you should welcome your role as a leader who
    helps to build an organization committed to putting people first.

    Why It Matters

    • If you lose sight of the forces that undermine a people first approach to change, you
    undermine your organization’s ability to attract, develop, and retain the best and
    brightest.

    • Committing to finding a better way every day is the only path to building a sustainable
    competitive advantage.

    • Continuing your own professional growth is the best move you can make to help others
    and to build the HR leadership role you and your employer deserve.

    “If you’re going to win, and keep on winning, you have to recognize that
    change is continuous and is never done.”

    Jack Welch

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 3 of 7

    FORCES THAT UNDERMINE A “PEOPLE FIRST” APPROACH
    TO LEADING CHANGE

    As noted in a previous course, “building a powerful workforce of smart, talented, and engaged people is a
    never-ending journey. You don’t get to sit back (at least not for long) and bask in the glory of what you
    have done” (JWI 522).

    To keep up with the transformations that organizations need to undergo, we must develop leaders who
    embrace change AND understand that the only way to lead meaningful change is through putting people
    first. This is a point that draws us back to Kotter’s distinction between management and leadership:

    “Because management deals mostly with the status quo and leadership deals mostly with
    change, in the next century we will have to become much more skilled at creating
    leaders. Without enough leaders, the vision, communication, and empowerment that are
    at the heart of transformation will simply not happen well enough or fast enough to satisfy
    our needs and expectations.”

    Leading Change, p. 173

    These new change leaders must have a vision and the ability to predict the future; they must have a
    special capacity to anticipate the radically unexpected. They must be driven to empower their people to
    do more and be their best.

    “Many of the same kinds of organizational attributes required to develop leadership are
    also needed to empower employees. Those facilitating factors would include flatter
    hierarchies, less bureaucracy, and a greater willingness to take risks. In addition,
    constant empowerment for a constantly changing world works best in organizations in
    which senior managers focus on leadership and in which they delegate most managerial
    responsibilities to lower levels.”

    Leading Change, p. 175

    While doing this, however, change leaders can’t be blind to the forces that undermine a “people first”
    approach. These forces include, but are not limited to:

    • Greed – not paying people what they are worth or giving them opportunities to grow
    • Being more comfortable in the role of a manager barking orders than in leadership inviting others

    to forge the future with you
    • Lack of vision – inability to see what’s coming and to inspire others to meet the future head on
    • Failure to elevate HR to a position of prominence in the C-Suite
    • Not understanding that people are the most important part of any organization and not getting

    every brain in the game
    • Hiding behind complex org charts and bureaucracies that impede communication and the free

    flow of ideas
    • Being too busy managing the day-to-day grind to engage others in the joy of building a winning

    organization

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 4 of 7

    BUILDING A CULTURE THAT EMBRACES FINDING A BETTER WAY EVERY DAY

    “Truly adaptive firms with adaptive cultures are awesome competitive machines. They
    produce superb products and services faster and better. They run circles around bloated
    bureaucracies. Even when they have far fewer resources and patents or less market
    share, they compete and win again and again.”

    Leading Change, p. 180

    As an HR leader, you and your team have a critical role to play in developing this culture. You can work
    with business-unit leaders to help them set up Work-Out sessions to find better ways to get business
    done. You can work with finance departments to find better ways to reward people who deliver cost
    saving and revenue increasing wins. You can help all managers and leaders deliver more effective
    performance feedback and talent development to their teams. You can help those leaders define the
    winning behaviors that can be observed, communicated, taught, measured, and rewarded.

    While an organization can learn and accomplish a lot over the course of a single major change effort,
    one-off events are rarely enough for new behaviors to take hold in a sustainable way. It’s just not enough
    for people throughout the organization to deeply learn the skills and mindsets needed to drive change.
    And it is certainly not enough to keep up in today’s rapidly shifting business environment.

    The work of change leaders is not just to navigate their organizations through a major change. It is also to
    identify, lead, and embed change after change after change to create an organization that is innovative,
    flexible, and forward-looking – one that never stops learning.

    Kotter says that if the rate of external change continues to climb, then the urgency rate of the winning
    twenty-first-century organization will have to be medium to high all the time. The twentieth-century model
    of lengthy periods of calm or complacency being punctuated by shorter periods of hectic activity will not
    work. A higher rate of urgency does not imply ever-present panic, anxiety, or fear. It means a state in
    which complacency is virtually absent, in which people are always looking for both problems and
    opportunities, and in which the norm is “do it now.”

    “Typical employees in typical firms today still receive little data on their performance, the
    performance of their group or department, and the performance of the firm.

    To both create these systems and use their output productively, corporate cultures in the
    twenty-first century will have to value candid discussions far more than they do today.
    Norms associated with political politeness, with nonconformational diplomaticese, and
    with killing-the-messenger-of bad-news will have to change. The volume knob on the
    dishonest dialog channel will have to be turned way down.”

    “The combination of valid data from a number of external sources, broad communication
    of that information inside an organization, and a willingness to deal honestly with the
    feedback will go a long way toward squashing complacency.”

    Leading Change, pp. 170-171

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 5 of 7

    LEVERAGING WHAT YOU HAVE LEARNED ABOUT LEADING CHANGE
    TO CONTINUE GROWING IN YOUR CAREER

    Kotter asserts that lifelong learning, a trait once seen in relatively few people, is the hallmark of the most
    successful leaders. “Instead of slowing down and peaking at age thirty-five or forty-five, they keep
    learning at a rate we normally associate only with children and young adults,” he writes (p. 185). It used
    to be that most people learned all they needed to know by the time they were fifteen. Today, not only
    does it take longer, but the realities are changing so quickly that many of our old behaviors and
    assumptions become outdated.

    “As the rate of change increases, the willingness and ability to keep developing become
    central to career success for individuals and to economic success for organizations.
    [People] win…because they outgrow their rivals. They develop the capacity to handle a
    complex and changing business environment. They grow to become unusually
    competent in advancing organizational transformation. They learn to be leaders.”

    Leading Change, p. 186

    The world’s increasing complexity calls for multifaceted change leaders with a variety of experiences and a
    depth of judgment. This richness takes time to develop. People who prioritize learning and growth have
    more to bring to the table at age 50 or 70 than they had at 30. Kotter encourages us to understand that the
    power of compounded growth applies just as surely to people as it does to money. Looking at two people –
    one who grows by 1% every year and the other who grows by 6% – he concluded that “[p]eers at age
    thirty…will be in totally different leagues at age fifty” (p. 190). One will be gathering strength, experience,
    power, and depth. The other risks becoming increasingly irrelevant, at least as a change leader.

    One of the keys to such continuous learning that he doesn’t mention is following your interests and
    passions to find, in Jack’s terms, your Area of Destiny. Even passions that seem unrelated to your job are
    valuable to the lifelong learner. They offer new avenues for development and mastery, and they often
    provide a lens for seeing business challenges and opportunities in new and creative ways.

    “People who learn to master more volatile career paths also usually become more
    comfortable with change generally and thus better able to play more useful roles in
    organizational transformations. They more easily develop whatever leadership potential
    they have. With more leadership, they are in a better position to help their employers
    advance the transformation process so as to significantly improve meaningful results
    while minimizing the painful effects of change.”

    Leading Change, p. 193

    THE PERSONAL QUALITIES OF CHANGE LEADERS

    Strong HR leaders can step up when required and help bring an organization through a big change event
    like a restructuring or an acquisition integration. It will take all their best efforts, perhaps over a period of
    years, but they can do it. Fewer, however, are comfortable in the world of continuous transformation
    where one major change initiative succeeds another.

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 6 of 7

    These rare change agents are restless and curious, always looking for ways to get better. They love a
    good challenge. They are at home with high levels of uncertainty. Their passion, enthusiasm, and
    conviction are infectious. They are true lifelong learners who possess the following characteristics:

    1. Risk Taking: a willingness to push oneself out of comfort zones
    2. Humble Self-Reflection: honest assessment of successes and failures, especially the latter
    3. Solicitation of Opinions: aggressive collection of information and ideas from others
    4. Careful Listening: propensity to listen to others
    5. Openness to New Ideas: willingness to view life with an open mind

    Leading Change, p. 191

    When organizations improve, many people win. Employees enjoy the intrinsic satisfactions of success,
    productivity, and creativity, as well as a better reputation and greater compensation. Consumers get more
    innovative products and services at better prices. Communities prosper. Many of these benefits come
    thanks to change agents – those people with the vision and courage to improve business and the skills to
    see their vision through.

    “A strategy of embracing the past will probably become increasingly ineffective over the
    next few decades. Better for most of us to start learning now how to cope with change, to
    develop whatever leadership potential we have, and to help our organizations in the
    transformation process. Better for most of us, despite the risks, to leap into the future.
    And to do so sooner rather than later.”

    Leading Change, p. 194

    It is our hope that through taking this course, you have strengthened your understanding of what it takes
    to lead meaningful change, and that you have come away with a new set of tools you can put to work as
    you lead your next change initiative. We wish you all the best in continuing your career growth to become
    a truly great agent of change who puts people first.

    “Good people never think they’ve reached the top of their game…
    but they’re dying to get there.”

    Jack Welch

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 7 of 7

    GETTING THE MOST OUT OF THIS WEEK’S CLASS

    As you read the materials and participate in class activities, stay focused on the key learning outcomes
    for the week:

    • Review the forces that undermine a "people first" approach to leading change

    Based on everything we have covered in this course, take time to reflect on the extent to which
    your organization demonstrates a commitment to putting people first. If they do, that’s great. If
    not, then you have opportunities to guide the steps that can lead to change. That change is not
    going to happen overnight, and without the support of senior leadership, it may never happen
    across the entire organization. But that shouldn’t stop you from making things better in the areas
    where you can. This may be only in your team at first, but if you can create the kind of culture
    within that team that empowers people to be their best, others will see what you’re doing and will
    want to emulate it. Pretty soon, you just may find yourself starting a movement.

    • Examine ways to build a culture that embraces finding a better way every day

    Look for tensions that exist between the desire to drive innovation and change, and the desire for
    stability and predictability in the operation of the business. Address these through the regular
    sharing of economic, technical, and market information. Engage your teams(s) in keeping their
    eyes and ears open for threats and opportunities that could impact the business. Build a level of
    heathy anxiety that encourages everyone to ask, “What’s next?” Done in the right way, this will
    foster a culture where people are more engaged in the business and welcome the challenge to do
    bigger and better things that keep the company winning.

    • Leverage what you have learned about leading change to continue growing in your career

    Find your Area of Destiny, and never stop learning and growing. Turn your job into something that
    energizes you and fulfills your passions, and you’ll never “work” another day in your life!

    **Week10Discussion556.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week10discussion556-jpeg)

    **Week10Discussion556.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week10discussion556-jpeg)

    **## TheFitOrganization.pdf**

    Copyright of Rotman Management is the property of Joseph L. Rotman School of
    Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
    listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
    download, or email articles for individual use.

    **## JWI556Week10LectureNotes.pdf**

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 1 of 7

    JWI 556
    Leading Change by Putting People First

    Week Ten Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 2 of 7

    SUSTAINING THE CHANGE AND KEEPING PEOPLE FIRST

    What It Means

    Change is about innovation and growth, and if you’re going to keep on winning, it’s never done.
    Successful change leaders are those who can build a culture that embraces change as a way of
    life rather than viewing it as an ordeal that has to be survived. If you truly believe that people are
    the most important part of any organization, then you should welcome your role as a leader who
    helps to build an organization committed to putting people first.

    Why It Matters

    • If you lose sight of the forces that undermine a people first approach to change, you
    undermine your organization’s ability to attract, develop, and retain the best and
    brightest.

    • Committing to finding a better way every day is the only path to building a sustainable
    competitive advantage.

    • Continuing your own professional growth is the best move you can make to help others
    and to build the HR leadership role you and your employer deserve.

    “If you’re going to win, and keep on winning, you have to recognize that
    change is continuous and is never done.”

    Jack Welch

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 3 of 7

    FORCES THAT UNDERMINE A “PEOPLE FIRST” APPROACH
    TO LEADING CHANGE

    As noted in a previous course, “building a powerful workforce of smart, talented, and engaged people is a
    never-ending journey. You don’t get to sit back (at least not for long) and bask in the glory of what you
    have done” (JWI 522).

    To keep up with the transformations that organizations need to undergo, we must develop leaders who
    embrace change AND understand that the only way to lead meaningful change is through putting people
    first. This is a point that draws us back to Kotter’s distinction between management and leadership:

    “Because management deals mostly with the status quo and leadership deals mostly with
    change, in the next century we will have to become much more skilled at creating
    leaders. Without enough leaders, the vision, communication, and empowerment that are
    at the heart of transformation will simply not happen well enough or fast enough to satisfy
    our needs and expectations.”

    Leading Change, p. 173

    These new change leaders must have a vision and the ability to predict the future; they must have a
    special capacity to anticipate the radically unexpected. They must be driven to empower their people to
    do more and be their best.

    “Many of the same kinds of organizational attributes required to develop leadership are
    also needed to empower employees. Those facilitating factors would include flatter
    hierarchies, less bureaucracy, and a greater willingness to take risks. In addition,
    constant empowerment for a constantly changing world works best in organizations in
    which senior managers focus on leadership and in which they delegate most managerial
    responsibilities to lower levels.”

    Leading Change, p. 175

    While doing this, however, change leaders can’t be blind to the forces that undermine a “people first”
    approach. These forces include, but are not limited to:

    • Greed – not paying people what they are worth or giving them opportunities to grow
    • Being more comfortable in the role of a manager barking orders than in leadership inviting others

    to forge the future with you
    • Lack of vision – inability to see what’s coming and to inspire others to meet the future head on
    • Failure to elevate HR to a position of prominence in the C-Suite
    • Not understanding that people are the most important part of any organization and not getting

    every brain in the game
    • Hiding behind complex org charts and bureaucracies that impede communication and the free

    flow of ideas
    • Being too busy managing the day-to-day grind to engage others in the joy of building a winning

    organization

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 4 of 7

    BUILDING A CULTURE THAT EMBRACES FINDING A BETTER WAY EVERY DAY

    “Truly adaptive firms with adaptive cultures are awesome competitive machines. They
    produce superb products and services faster and better. They run circles around bloated
    bureaucracies. Even when they have far fewer resources and patents or less market
    share, they compete and win again and again.”

    Leading Change, p. 180

    As an HR leader, you and your team have a critical role to play in developing this culture. You can work
    with business-unit leaders to help them set up Work-Out sessions to find better ways to get business
    done. You can work with finance departments to find better ways to reward people who deliver cost
    saving and revenue increasing wins. You can help all managers and leaders deliver more effective
    performance feedback and talent development to their teams. You can help those leaders define the
    winning behaviors that can be observed, communicated, taught, measured, and rewarded.

    While an organization can learn and accomplish a lot over the course of a single major change effort,
    one-off events are rarely enough for new behaviors to take hold in a sustainable way. It’s just not enough
    for people throughout the organization to deeply learn the skills and mindsets needed to drive change.
    And it is certainly not enough to keep up in today’s rapidly shifting business environment.

    The work of change leaders is not just to navigate their organizations through a major change. It is also to
    identify, lead, and embed change after change after change to create an organization that is innovative,
    flexible, and forward-looking – one that never stops learning.

    Kotter says that if the rate of external change continues to climb, then the urgency rate of the winning
    twenty-first-century organization will have to be medium to high all the time. The twentieth-century model
    of lengthy periods of calm or complacency being punctuated by shorter periods of hectic activity will not
    work. A higher rate of urgency does not imply ever-present panic, anxiety, or fear. It means a state in
    which complacency is virtually absent, in which people are always looking for both problems and
    opportunities, and in which the norm is “do it now.”

    “Typical employees in typical firms today still receive little data on their performance, the
    performance of their group or department, and the performance of the firm.

    To both create these systems and use their output productively, corporate cultures in the
    twenty-first century will have to value candid discussions far more than they do today.
    Norms associated with political politeness, with nonconformational diplomaticese, and
    with killing-the-messenger-of bad-news will have to change. The volume knob on the
    dishonest dialog channel will have to be turned way down.”

    “The combination of valid data from a number of external sources, broad communication
    of that information inside an organization, and a willingness to deal honestly with the
    feedback will go a long way toward squashing complacency.”

    Leading Change, pp. 170-171

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 5 of 7

    LEVERAGING WHAT YOU HAVE LEARNED ABOUT LEADING CHANGE
    TO CONTINUE GROWING IN YOUR CAREER

    Kotter asserts that lifelong learning, a trait once seen in relatively few people, is the hallmark of the most
    successful leaders. “Instead of slowing down and peaking at age thirty-five or forty-five, they keep
    learning at a rate we normally associate only with children and young adults,” he writes (p. 185). It used
    to be that most people learned all they needed to know by the time they were fifteen. Today, not only
    does it take longer, but the realities are changing so quickly that many of our old behaviors and
    assumptions become outdated.

    “As the rate of change increases, the willingness and ability to keep developing become
    central to career success for individuals and to economic success for organizations.
    [People] win…because they outgrow their rivals. They develop the capacity to handle a
    complex and changing business environment. They grow to become unusually
    competent in advancing organizational transformation. They learn to be leaders.”

    Leading Change, p. 186

    The world’s increasing complexity calls for multifaceted change leaders with a variety of experiences and a
    depth of judgment. This richness takes time to develop. People who prioritize learning and growth have
    more to bring to the table at age 50 or 70 than they had at 30. Kotter encourages us to understand that the
    power of compounded growth applies just as surely to people as it does to money. Looking at two people –
    one who grows by 1% every year and the other who grows by 6% – he concluded that “[p]eers at age
    thirty…will be in totally different leagues at age fifty” (p. 190). One will be gathering strength, experience,
    power, and depth. The other risks becoming increasingly irrelevant, at least as a change leader.

    One of the keys to such continuous learning that he doesn’t mention is following your interests and
    passions to find, in Jack’s terms, your Area of Destiny. Even passions that seem unrelated to your job are
    valuable to the lifelong learner. They offer new avenues for development and mastery, and they often
    provide a lens for seeing business challenges and opportunities in new and creative ways.

    “People who learn to master more volatile career paths also usually become more
    comfortable with change generally and thus better able to play more useful roles in
    organizational transformations. They more easily develop whatever leadership potential
    they have. With more leadership, they are in a better position to help their employers
    advance the transformation process so as to significantly improve meaningful results
    while minimizing the painful effects of change.”

    Leading Change, p. 193

    THE PERSONAL QUALITIES OF CHANGE LEADERS

    Strong HR leaders can step up when required and help bring an organization through a big change event
    like a restructuring or an acquisition integration. It will take all their best efforts, perhaps over a period of
    years, but they can do it. Fewer, however, are comfortable in the world of continuous transformation
    where one major change initiative succeeds another.

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 6 of 7

    These rare change agents are restless and curious, always looking for ways to get better. They love a
    good challenge. They are at home with high levels of uncertainty. Their passion, enthusiasm, and
    conviction are infectious. They are true lifelong learners who possess the following characteristics:

    1. Risk Taking: a willingness to push oneself out of comfort zones
    2. Humble Self-Reflection: honest assessment of successes and failures, especially the latter
    3. Solicitation of Opinions: aggressive collection of information and ideas from others
    4. Careful Listening: propensity to listen to others
    5. Openness to New Ideas: willingness to view life with an open mind

    Leading Change, p. 191

    When organizations improve, many people win. Employees enjoy the intrinsic satisfactions of success,
    productivity, and creativity, as well as a better reputation and greater compensation. Consumers get more
    innovative products and services at better prices. Communities prosper. Many of these benefits come
    thanks to change agents – those people with the vision and courage to improve business and the skills to
    see their vision through.

    “A strategy of embracing the past will probably become increasingly ineffective over the
    next few decades. Better for most of us to start learning now how to cope with change, to
    develop whatever leadership potential we have, and to help our organizations in the
    transformation process. Better for most of us, despite the risks, to leap into the future.
    And to do so sooner rather than later.”

    Leading Change, p. 194

    It is our hope that through taking this course, you have strengthened your understanding of what it takes
    to lead meaningful change, and that you have come away with a new set of tools you can put to work as
    you lead your next change initiative. We wish you all the best in continuing your career growth to become
    a truly great agent of change who puts people first.

    “Good people never think they’ve reached the top of their game…
    but they’re dying to get there.”

    Jack Welch

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 7 of 7

    GETTING THE MOST OUT OF THIS WEEK’S CLASS

    As you read the materials and participate in class activities, stay focused on the key learning outcomes
    for the week:

    • Review the forces that undermine a "people first" approach to leading change

    Based on everything we have covered in this course, take time to reflect on the extent to which
    your organization demonstrates a commitment to putting people first. If they do, that’s great. If
    not, then you have opportunities to guide the steps that can lead to change. That change is not
    going to happen overnight, and without the support of senior leadership, it may never happen
    across the entire organization. But that shouldn’t stop you from making things better in the areas
    where you can. This may be only in your team at first, but if you can create the kind of culture
    within that team that empowers people to be their best, others will see what you’re doing and will
    want to emulate it. Pretty soon, you just may find yourself starting a movement.

    • Examine ways to build a culture that embraces finding a better way every day

    Look for tensions that exist between the desire to drive innovation and change, and the desire for
    stability and predictability in the operation of the business. Address these through the regular
    sharing of economic, technical, and market information. Engage your teams(s) in keeping their
    eyes and ears open for threats and opportunities that could impact the business. Build a level of
    heathy anxiety that encourages everyone to ask, “What’s next?” Done in the right way, this will
    foster a culture where people are more engaged in the business and welcome the challenge to do
    bigger and better things that keep the company winning.

    • Leverage what you have learned about leading change to continue growing in your career

    Find your Area of Destiny, and never stop learning and growing. Turn your job into something that
    energizes you and fulfills your passions, and you’ll never “work” another day in your life!

    **Week10Discussion556.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week10discussion556-jpeg)

    **## TheFitOrganization.pdf**

    Copyright of Rotman Management is the property of Joseph L. Rotman School of
    Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
    listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
    download, or email articles for individual use.

    **## JWI556Week10LectureNotes.pdf**

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 1 of 7

    JWI 556
    Leading Change by Putting People First

    Week Ten Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 2 of 7

    SUSTAINING THE CHANGE AND KEEPING PEOPLE FIRST

    What It Means

    Change is about innovation and growth, and if you’re going to keep on winning, it’s never done.
    Successful change leaders are those who can build a culture that embraces change as a way of
    life rather than viewing it as an ordeal that has to be survived. If you truly believe that people are
    the most important part of any organization, then you should welcome your role as a leader who
    helps to build an organization committed to putting people first.

    Why It Matters

    • If you lose sight of the forces that undermine a people first approach to change, you
    undermine your organization’s ability to attract, develop, and retain the best and
    brightest.

    • Committing to finding a better way every day is the only path to building a sustainable
    competitive advantage.

    • Continuing your own professional growth is the best move you can make to help others
    and to build the HR leadership role you and your employer deserve.

    “If you’re going to win, and keep on winning, you have to recognize that
    change is continuous and is never done.”

    Jack Welch

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 3 of 7

    FORCES THAT UNDERMINE A “PEOPLE FIRST” APPROACH
    TO LEADING CHANGE

    As noted in a previous course, “building a powerful workforce of smart, talented, and engaged people is a
    never-ending journey. You don’t get to sit back (at least not for long) and bask in the glory of what you
    have done” (JWI 522).

    To keep up with the transformations that organizations need to undergo, we must develop leaders who
    embrace change AND understand that the only way to lead meaningful change is through putting people
    first. This is a point that draws us back to Kotter’s distinction between management and leadership:

    “Because management deals mostly with the status quo and leadership deals mostly with
    change, in the next century we will have to become much more skilled at creating
    leaders. Without enough leaders, the vision, communication, and empowerment that are
    at the heart of transformation will simply not happen well enough or fast enough to satisfy
    our needs and expectations.”

    Leading Change, p. 173

    These new change leaders must have a vision and the ability to predict the future; they must have a
    special capacity to anticipate the radically unexpected. They must be driven to empower their people to
    do more and be their best.

    “Many of the same kinds of organizational attributes required to develop leadership are
    also needed to empower employees. Those facilitating factors would include flatter
    hierarchies, less bureaucracy, and a greater willingness to take risks. In addition,
    constant empowerment for a constantly changing world works best in organizations in
    which senior managers focus on leadership and in which they delegate most managerial
    responsibilities to lower levels.”

    Leading Change, p. 175

    While doing this, however, change leaders can’t be blind to the forces that undermine a “people first”
    approach. These forces include, but are not limited to:

    • Greed – not paying people what they are worth or giving them opportunities to grow
    • Being more comfortable in the role of a manager barking orders than in leadership inviting others

    to forge the future with you
    • Lack of vision – inability to see what’s coming and to inspire others to meet the future head on
    • Failure to elevate HR to a position of prominence in the C-Suite
    • Not understanding that people are the most important part of any organization and not getting

    every brain in the game
    • Hiding behind complex org charts and bureaucracies that impede communication and the free

    flow of ideas
    • Being too busy managing the day-to-day grind to engage others in the joy of building a winning

    organization

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 4 of 7

    BUILDING A CULTURE THAT EMBRACES FINDING A BETTER WAY EVERY DAY

    “Truly adaptive firms with adaptive cultures are awesome competitive machines. They
    produce superb products and services faster and better. They run circles around bloated
    bureaucracies. Even when they have far fewer resources and patents or less market
    share, they compete and win again and again.”

    Leading Change, p. 180

    As an HR leader, you and your team have a critical role to play in developing this culture. You can work
    with business-unit leaders to help them set up Work-Out sessions to find better ways to get business
    done. You can work with finance departments to find better ways to reward people who deliver cost
    saving and revenue increasing wins. You can help all managers and leaders deliver more effective
    performance feedback and talent development to their teams. You can help those leaders define the
    winning behaviors that can be observed, communicated, taught, measured, and rewarded.

    While an organization can learn and accomplish a lot over the course of a single major change effort,
    one-off events are rarely enough for new behaviors to take hold in a sustainable way. It’s just not enough
    for people throughout the organization to deeply learn the skills and mindsets needed to drive change.
    And it is certainly not enough to keep up in today’s rapidly shifting business environment.

    The work of change leaders is not just to navigate their organizations through a major change. It is also to
    identify, lead, and embed change after change after change to create an organization that is innovative,
    flexible, and forward-looking – one that never stops learning.

    Kotter says that if the rate of external change continues to climb, then the urgency rate of the winning
    twenty-first-century organization will have to be medium to high all the time. The twentieth-century model
    of lengthy periods of calm or complacency being punctuated by shorter periods of hectic activity will not
    work. A higher rate of urgency does not imply ever-present panic, anxiety, or fear. It means a state in
    which complacency is virtually absent, in which people are always looking for both problems and
    opportunities, and in which the norm is “do it now.”

    “Typical employees in typical firms today still receive little data on their performance, the
    performance of their group or department, and the performance of the firm.

    To both create these systems and use their output productively, corporate cultures in the
    twenty-first century will have to value candid discussions far more than they do today.
    Norms associated with political politeness, with nonconformational diplomaticese, and
    with killing-the-messenger-of bad-news will have to change. The volume knob on the
    dishonest dialog channel will have to be turned way down.”

    “The combination of valid data from a number of external sources, broad communication
    of that information inside an organization, and a willingness to deal honestly with the
    feedback will go a long way toward squashing complacency.”

    Leading Change, pp. 170-171

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 5 of 7

    LEVERAGING WHAT YOU HAVE LEARNED ABOUT LEADING CHANGE
    TO CONTINUE GROWING IN YOUR CAREER

    Kotter asserts that lifelong learning, a trait once seen in relatively few people, is the hallmark of the most
    successful leaders. “Instead of slowing down and peaking at age thirty-five or forty-five, they keep
    learning at a rate we normally associate only with children and young adults,” he writes (p. 185). It used
    to be that most people learned all they needed to know by the time they were fifteen. Today, not only
    does it take longer, but the realities are changing so quickly that many of our old behaviors and
    assumptions become outdated.

    “As the rate of change increases, the willingness and ability to keep developing become
    central to career success for individuals and to economic success for organizations.
    [People] win…because they outgrow their rivals. They develop the capacity to handle a
    complex and changing business environment. They grow to become unusually
    competent in advancing organizational transformation. They learn to be leaders.”

    Leading Change, p. 186

    The world’s increasing complexity calls for multifaceted change leaders with a variety of experiences and a
    depth of judgment. This richness takes time to develop. People who prioritize learning and growth have
    more to bring to the table at age 50 or 70 than they had at 30. Kotter encourages us to understand that the
    power of compounded growth applies just as surely to people as it does to money. Looking at two people –
    one who grows by 1% every year and the other who grows by 6% – he concluded that “[p]eers at age
    thirty…will be in totally different leagues at age fifty” (p. 190). One will be gathering strength, experience,
    power, and depth. The other risks becoming increasingly irrelevant, at least as a change leader.

    One of the keys to such continuous learning that he doesn’t mention is following your interests and
    passions to find, in Jack’s terms, your Area of Destiny. Even passions that seem unrelated to your job are
    valuable to the lifelong learner. They offer new avenues for development and mastery, and they often
    provide a lens for seeing business challenges and opportunities in new and creative ways.

    “People who learn to master more volatile career paths also usually become more
    comfortable with change generally and thus better able to play more useful roles in
    organizational transformations. They more easily develop whatever leadership potential
    they have. With more leadership, they are in a better position to help their employers
    advance the transformation process so as to significantly improve meaningful results
    while minimizing the painful effects of change.”

    Leading Change, p. 193

    THE PERSONAL QUALITIES OF CHANGE LEADERS

    Strong HR leaders can step up when required and help bring an organization through a big change event
    like a restructuring or an acquisition integration. It will take all their best efforts, perhaps over a period of
    years, but they can do it. Fewer, however, are comfortable in the world of continuous transformation
    where one major change initiative succeeds another.

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 6 of 7

    These rare change agents are restless and curious, always looking for ways to get better. They love a
    good challenge. They are at home with high levels of uncertainty. Their passion, enthusiasm, and
    conviction are infectious. They are true lifelong learners who possess the following characteristics:

    1. Risk Taking: a willingness to push oneself out of comfort zones
    2. Humble Self-Reflection: honest assessment of successes and failures, especially the latter
    3. Solicitation of Opinions: aggressive collection of information and ideas from others
    4. Careful Listening: propensity to listen to others
    5. Openness to New Ideas: willingness to view life with an open mind

    Leading Change, p. 191

    When organizations improve, many people win. Employees enjoy the intrinsic satisfactions of success,
    productivity, and creativity, as well as a better reputation and greater compensation. Consumers get more
    innovative products and services at better prices. Communities prosper. Many of these benefits come
    thanks to change agents – those people with the vision and courage to improve business and the skills to
    see their vision through.

    “A strategy of embracing the past will probably become increasingly ineffective over the
    next few decades. Better for most of us to start learning now how to cope with change, to
    develop whatever leadership potential we have, and to help our organizations in the
    transformation process. Better for most of us, despite the risks, to leap into the future.
    And to do so sooner rather than later.”

    Leading Change, p. 194

    It is our hope that through taking this course, you have strengthened your understanding of what it takes
    to lead meaningful change, and that you have come away with a new set of tools you can put to work as
    you lead your next change initiative. We wish you all the best in continuing your career growth to become
    a truly great agent of change who puts people first.

    “Good people never think they’ve reached the top of their game…
    but they’re dying to get there.”

    Jack Welch

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not
    be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 556 (1196) Page 7 of 7

    GETTING THE MOST OUT OF THIS WEEK’S CLASS

    As you read the materials and participate in class activities, stay focused on the key learning outcomes
    for the week:

    • Review the forces that undermine a "people first" approach to leading change

    Based on everything we have covered in this course, take time to reflect on the extent to which
    your organization demonstrates a commitment to putting people first. If they do, that’s great. If
    not, then you have opportunities to guide the steps that can lead to change. That change is not
    going to happen overnight, and without the support of senior leadership, it may never happen
    across the entire organization. But that shouldn’t stop you from making things better in the areas
    where you can. This may be only in your team at first, but if you can create the kind of culture
    within that team that empowers people to be their best, others will see what you’re doing and will
    want to emulate it. Pretty soon, you just may find yourself starting a movement.

    • Examine ways to build a culture that embraces finding a better way every day

    Look for tensions that exist between the desire to drive innovation and change, and the desire for
    stability and predictability in the operation of the business. Address these through the regular
    sharing of economic, technical, and market information. Engage your teams(s) in keeping their
    eyes and ears open for threats and opportunities that could impact the business. Build a level of
    heathy anxiety that encourages everyone to ask, “What’s next?” Done in the right way, this will
    foster a culture where people are more engaged in the business and welcome the challenge to do
    bigger and better things that keep the company winning.

    • Leverage what you have learned about leading change to continue growing in your career

    Find your Area of Destiny, and never stop learning and growing. Turn your job into something that
    energizes you and fulfills your passions, and you’ll never “work” another day in your life!

    **Week10Discussion556.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week10discussion556-jpeg)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] WK5 DISCUSSION1 HP-214

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    COMPLETE WITH 250 WORDS – ## WK5DISCUSSION1HP-214.docx **## WK5DISCUSSION1HP-214.docx** WK5 DISCUSSION1 HP-214 Attention to Detail and the CMS-1500 Claim Form Producing a clean claim is one of the important goals for billing specialists. Attention to detail and accuracy should be at the forefront wh…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    COMPLETE WITH 250 WORDS

    – ## WK5DISCUSSION1HP-214.docx

    **## WK5DISCUSSION1HP-214.docx**

    WK5 DISCUSSION1 HP-214

    Attention to Detail and the CMS-1500 Claim Form

    Producing a clean claim is one of the important goals for billing specialists. Attention to detail and accuracy should be at the forefront when submitting a CMS-1500 claim form for reimbursement. Ensuring that the insured person's name is exactly as it appears on their insurance card is one step toward producing a clean claim. Additionally, reviewing a completed Medicare claim could be one of your main responsibilities. Discuss steps you would take to make sure that you followed all billing guidelines for submitting your CMS-1500 claim form for reimbursement.

    Analyze a completed Medicare claim to identify potential causes for denial.

    Include the following aspects in the discussion:

    · A minimum of three specific reasons for a claim rejection

    · Give a specific example for each of the three reasons

    · Identify any errors that you may have found on your completed claim

    · Discuss at least three steps that you would take to produce a clean claim

    ·
    Discuss some of the other reasons a claim can be rejected or denied

    250 WORDS

    **## WK5DISCUSSION1HP-214.docx**

    WK5 DISCUSSION1 HP-214

    Attention to Detail and the CMS-1500 Claim Form

    Producing a clean claim is one of the important goals for billing specialists. Attention to detail and accuracy should be at the forefront when submitting a CMS-1500 claim form for reimbursement. Ensuring that the insured person's name is exactly as it appears on their insurance card is one step toward producing a clean claim. Additionally, reviewing a completed Medicare claim could be one of your main responsibilities. Discuss steps you would take to make sure that you followed all billing guidelines for submitting your CMS-1500 claim form for reimbursement.

    Analyze a completed Medicare claim to identify potential causes for denial.

    Include the following aspects in the discussion:

    · A minimum of three specific reasons for a claim rejection

    · Give a specific example for each of the three reasons

    · Identify any errors that you may have found on your completed claim

    · Discuss at least three steps that you would take to produce a clean claim

    ·
    Discuss some of the other reasons a claim can be rejected or denied

    250 WORDS

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] peds CJP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Initials – D.G DOB 10/17/2017 Age 7 brought to the hospital with inpetigo and fever, skin lesions/ warm and dry blisters on hands (bumps with pus) – pending labs,blood culture Contact precautions for staphylococcus no allergies history – Coartraction of aorta, horsesechoe kidney, asthma, trach that …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Initials – D.G DOB 10/17/2017 Age 7
    brought to the hospital with inpetigo and fever, skin lesions/ warm and dry blisters on hands (bumps with pus) – pending labs,blood culture
    Contact precautions for staphylococcus
    no allergies
    history – Coartraction of aorta, horsesechoe kidney, asthma, trach that was removed 4/2025
    IV LFA #22G
    Meds – Zosyn Q6
    Zyvox Q12
    D5LR @65 ML/HR
    Aceteminophen 160mg/5ml oral
    clonidine 0.1mg tab
    pepcid 40mg/5ml oral
    \
    NURS317L-ClinicalJudgmentPlan.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nurs317l-clinicaljudgmentplan-docx "NURS317L-ClinicalJudgmentPlan.docx")

  • [Solved] Mod 4 Assignment WH

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**Gynecological Health Care for Lesbian, Bisexual & Transgender Individuals**_ The purpose of this assingment is to better understand gynecological health care for lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals. – Define and describe for lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals. – Gender and se…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**Gynecological Health Care for Lesbian, Bisexual & Transgender Individuals**_
    The purpose of this assingment is to better understand gynecological health care for lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals.
    – Define and describe for lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals.
    – Gender and sexuality concepts.
    – Social and political context.
    – Social determinants of health affecting lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals.
    – Barriers to health care.
    – Health care disparities.
    Clear and concise proper grammar, punctuation 3 pages in length, excluding the title and references pages formatted per APA style. Incorporate current practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment and a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years.
    ****course Textbooks
    Schuiling, K. D., & Likis, F. E. (2022). Gynecologic Health Care: with an Introduction to Prenatal and Postpartum Care (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284182347 2. Fitzgerald, M. A. (2017). Nurse Practitioner Certification Examination and Practice Preparation. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company. ISBN: 978-0803660427

  • [Solved] 401 Leadership & Ethics & Exercise – Individual

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## PFST401LeadershipandEthicsExerciseIndividual.docx – ## LeadershipandEthicsSummary.docx **## PFST401LeadershipandEthicsExerciseIndividual.docx** ###### Leadership and Ethics Exercise – Individual Complete the questions below[footnoteRef:1]. In the first column, indicate whether you agree or di…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## PFST401LeadershipandEthicsExerciseIndividual.docx

    – ## LeadershipandEthicsSummary.docx

    **## PFST401LeadershipandEthicsExerciseIndividual.docx**

    ###### Leadership and Ethics Exercise – Individual

    Complete the questions below[footnoteRef:1]. In the first column, indicate whether you agree or disagree with it. In the second column, indicate whether you think your groupmates would agree or disagree with each item. Think carefully about each item before providing an answer. [1: Adapted from Richard Daft's The Leadership Experience ]

    Name_________________________________

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | ## **Ethics-Related Question** | ## **Me  (Agree / Disagree)** | ## **My Groupmates (Agree / Disagree)** |
    | 1. Overall, it is better to be humble and honest than to be successful and dishonest. | Agree | |
    | 2. If you trust someone completely, you are asking for trouble | Disagree | |
    | 3. A leader should take action only when it is morally right. | Agree | |
    | 4. A good way to handle people is to tell them what they like to hear. | Disagree | |
    | 5. There is no excuse for telling a white lie to someone. | Agree | |
    | 6. It makes sense to flatter important people. | Disagree | |
    | 7. Most people who get ahead as leaders have led very moral lives. | Disagree | |
    | 8. It is better not to tell people the real reason you did something unless it benefits you to do so. | Agree | |
    | 9. The majority of people are brave, good, and kind. | Disagree | |
    | 10. It is hard to get to the top without sometimes cutting corners. | Disagree | |

    **Reflection**

    Page | 2

    **## LeadershipandEthicsSummary.docx**

    ###### Leadership and Ethics Summary[footnoteRef:1] [1: Adapted from: The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ]

    **Background on Leadership**

    Leadership has been defined in various ways (Fleishman and others, 1991). One common definition regards leadership as a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2016, p. 16). The following components are central to this definition: (a) leadership is a process, (b) leadership involves influence, (c) leadership occurs in groups, and (d) leadership involves common goals.

    For present purposes, leadership refers to the individuals exerting influence as 'leaders', and to those being influenced as 'followers'. While the distinction between leaders and followers is helpful for illustrative purposes, it should be noted that one can simultaneously be a leader in one context and a follower in another context. It should also be noted that leadership can be formal, such as in the case of an elected prime minister or a company's CEO. But there are also cases of informal leadership, when the influence does not derive from a formal authority conferred through rules and procedures. Finally, it is useful to highlight that leaders can be associated with the world of business, politics, popular culture, and other areas of life.

    Therefore, the three questions to examine are:

    1. What is ethical leadership?

    2.
    Why is ethical leadership important?

    3. How can ethical leadership be promoted?

    1.
    **Ethical Leadership**

    Eisenbeiss (2012) argues that this concept involves setting and pursuing ethical goals and influencing others in an ethical manner. Similarly, De Hoogh and Den Hartog (2009) define ethical leadership as the process of influencing the activities of a group toward goal achievement in a socially responsible way. They focus both on the means through which leaders attempt to achieve goals as well as on the ends themselves.

    The study of ethics generally consists of examining questions about right and wrong, virtue, duty, justice, fairness, and responsibility towards others. From an ethical perspective, according to Ciulla (2014, p. 16), the ultimate point of studying leadership is to answer the question: What is good leadership? The word "good" has two meanings in this context: technically good (or effective) and morally good. This focus on the concept of 'morally good' demonstrates that ethics lies at the heart of leadership studies.

    2.
    **Importance of Ethical Leadership**

    Ethical leadership is important for two main reasons. First, leaders have ethical responsibilities because they have a special position in which they have a greater opportunity to influence others and, therefore, outcomes in significant ways. Most people would agree that all of us have a responsibility to behave ethically, but it is clear that leaders are held to higher ethical standards than followers.

    The values of leaders influence the culture of an organization or society, and whether it behaves ethically or not. Leaders set the tone, develop the vision, and their values and behaviours shape the behaviour those involved in the organization or society. Therefore, leaders have a significant impact on people and societies. Examples of formal and informal leaders from around the world include Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, Malala Yousafzai, Peng Liyuan (First Lady of China), Sheikh Hasina Wajed (Prime Minister of Bangladesh), Yvon Chouinard (the founder of Patagonia), Melinda Gates and Angelina Jolie. However, the impact of a leader is not always positive, as illustrated by Hitler's leadership of Nazi Germany. The impact of his leadership was disastrous for millions of individuals and the world in general.

    On a smaller scale, even team leaders can have profound effects on their team members and the organization. All leaders, no matter how many followers they have, exert power. To exert power over other people carries an ethical responsibility. Power is the ability of one person (or department) in an organization to influence other people to bring about desired outcomes. The greater the power, the more responsibility a leader has. Therefore, leaders at all levels carry a responsibility for setting the ethical tone and for acting as role models for others.

    Contemporary practice and literature is shifting the focus away from traditional leadership styles, such as charismatic and transactional leadership, and is increasingly focusing on leadership styles that emphasize an ethical dimension, such as transformative, servant, value-based or authentic leadership. In other words, what is regarded today as a 'good leader' is someone who effectively leads towards ethical results and not someone who is simply good at leading (as many ill meaning demagogues can be). It has been argued that this development emphasizes the strong links between ethics and effective leadership (Ng and Feldman, 2015).

    Two models can be used to explain the relationship between ethical leadership and effective leadership – the 'interpersonal trust' model and the 'social power' model. The former is attributed to Schindler and Thomas (1993), who argue that interpersonal trust is based on five components: integrity, competence, consistency, loyalty, and openness. Integrity refers to honesty and truthfulness; competence is associated with technical and interpersonal knowledge and skills; consistency is defined as reliability, predictability, and good judgment; loyalty refers to willingness to protect and save face for a person; and openness is the willingness to share ideas and information freely. This model reflects the idea that followers who trust a leader are willing to be vulnerable to the leader's actions because they are confident that their rights and interests will not be abused.

    The 'social power' model was developed by French and Raven (1959), who identified five common and important bases of power: legitimate, coercive, reward, expert, and referent. Legitimate power refers to a person's right to influence another person coupled with the latter's obligation to accept this influence; coercive power derives from having the capacity to penalize or punish others; reward power is about having the capacity to provide rewards to others; expert power is based on the followers' perceptions of the leader's competence; and referent power derives from the followers' identification with and liking of the leader. Each of these bases of power increases a leader's capacity to influence the attitudes, values, or behaviours of others.

    There are three ways in which a follower may react to these forms of power, according to French and Raven (1959). First, when leaders successfully use legitimate or coercive or reward power (collectively referred to as position power) they will generate compliance. Compliance means that people follow the directions of the person with power, whether or not they agree with those directions. The second way in which followers may react to the use of power, especially the use of coercion that exceeds a level people consider legitimate, is to resist the leader's attempt to influence.

    Resistance means that employees will deliberately try to avoid carrying out instructions or they will attempt to disobey orders. The third type of reaction to power is commitment, which is the response most often generated by expert or referent power (collectively referred to as personal power). Commitment means that followers adopt the leader's viewpoint and enthusiastically carry out instructions. Although compliance alone may be enough for routine matters, commitment is particularly important when the leader is promoting change (Daft, 2008, p. 365). In general, people tend to identify with an ethical leader. Ethical leadership is not the sole source of referent power, but it is an important one, particularly in an increasingly changing, globalizing, and transparent world.
    **3. Ethical dimensions of leadership**

    The evaluation of leadership from an ethical point of view is influenced by ethical theories and principles of ethical leadership, as well as by practical questions. Ethical theories provide a system of rules or principles that guide us in making decisions about what is right or wrong and good or bad in a particular situation (Northouse, 2016). There are various theoretical approaches to ethical decision-making. Three of the major Western theories were discussed in
    [Module 1](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-1/index.html): utilitarianism (morality depends on whether the action maximizes the overall social 'utility' or happiness), deontology (morality depends on conformity to moral principles or duties irrespective of the consequences) and virtue ethics (morality depends on perfecting one's character). Practical guidelines for exercising ethical leadership have been created by various scholars. For example, Eisenbeiss (2012) highlights four principles of ethical leadership: humane orientation, justice orientation, responsibility and sustainability orientation, and moderation orientation. Another approach is that of Northouse (2016), who suggests five principles of ethical leadership: respect, service, justice, honesty, and community.

    While theories and principles of ethical leadership are pertinent, practical questions are also important for ethical dilemmas, especially since it is not always feasible to apply a detailed theoretical analysis before making a decision. In this regard, it is helpful to use a checklist to guide decision-making. This is sometimes referred to as "ethics quick tests" or ethical decision-making models, both of which have made their appearance in various guises such as codes of conduct of large corporations.

    The following example of an ethical decision-making model:

    ![Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum: A Pilot Study to Assess Students' Ethical Reasoning – Willey – 2012 – Journal of Legal Studies Education – Wiley Online Library](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/401-leadership-and-ethics-and-exercise-individual)

    Another example is the
    [ethics quick test](http://www.ethics.org.au/about/what-is-ethics) that is provided by The Ethics Center, an Australian-based non-profit organization. The Ethics Center suggests that we ask the following six questions before we make a decision:

    1. Would I be happy for this decision to be headlining the news tomorrow?

    2. Is there a universal rule that applies here?

    3. Will the proposed course of action bring about a good result?

    4. What would happen if everybody did this?

    5. What will this proposed action do to my character or the character of my organization?

    6. Is the proposed course of action consistent with my values and principles?

    Effective leaders are often confronted with impossible dilemmas, where no ideal resolution exists. In such situation leaders need to make difficult decisions that involve sacrificing some goods for the sake of promoting others. A classic example is the decision to go to war, knowing that many people, including civilians, will die. Sometimes this dilemma is known as
    [the dirty hands problem](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dirty-hands/).

    #### Becoming an ethical leader

    The issue of ethical leadership is an ancient one. For example, Aristotle argued that the ethical person in a position of leadership embodies the virtues of courage, temperance, generosity, self-control, honesty, sociability, modesty, fairness, and justice. To Confucius, wisdom, benevolence and courage are the core virtues. Applying ethics to leadership and management, Velasquez (1992) has suggested that managers develop virtues such as perseverance, public-spiritedness, integrity, truthfulness, fidelity, benevolence, and humility. Ethical leadership is also associated with the African concept of the sage. Henry Odera Oruka (1944-1995), from Kenya, researched sage traditions of Sub-Saharan Africa and provided an account of wisdom that is distinctly African. The contemporary South African author Reul Khoza provided accounts of ethical leadership from the perspective of Ubuntu which, among other things, feature a communitarian account of virtue originating in Africa.

    The philosopher Al-Farabi (872-950) provides us insights into ethical leadership from an Islamic perspective. He was born somewhere in modern day Central Asia, and moved throughout the great cities of the Islamic world, such as Baghdad and Damascus. His philosophy was wide ranging, but his insights on leadership can be found in his writings on ethics and politics. In those works, including his famous book The Virtuous City, Al-Farabi argued that leaders should also be philosophers, an idea he drew from the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato. For Al-Farabi, this meant that a leader must not just be a person of action and power, but one who reflects upon what is best for the community which he or she governs. Unlike Plato, he argued that the best city was not a monocultural one, but one which embraced diversity, and the wisest leaders found ways in which peoples of different races and beliefs could live together. Other thinkers have emphasized other sets of virtues, but the differences are not as big as one might think. In fact, people from various cultures may have quite similar views on essential virtues.

    Regarding the development of virtues, according to the Aristotelian way, when virtues are practiced over time, from youth to adulthood, good values become habitual, and part of the people themselves. By telling the truth, people become truthful; by giving to the poor, people become benevolent; by being fair to others, people become just. The Confucian way of cultivating oneself begins with obtaining a deep knowledge of how the world works, moves through taking certain actions and ends with one's most ambitious goal – to illustrate virtue throughout the world. This is strongly connected to the idea that 'knowing', 'doing' and 'being' are three interrelated components of an ethical person. In The Great Learning, written around 500 B.C., and the first of four books selected by Zhu Xi during the Song Dynasty as a foundational introduction to Confucianism,
    [Confucius](http://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/learning.html) described the process as follows:

    The ancients who wished to illustrate illustrious virtue throughout the kingdom first ordered well their own states. Wishing to order well their states, they first regulated their families. Wishing to regulate their families, they first cultivated their persons. Wishing to cultivate their persons, they first rectified their hearts. Wishing to rectify their hearts, they first sought to be sincere in their thoughts. Wishing to be sincere in their thoughts, they first extended to the utmost their knowledge. Such extension of knowledge lay in the investigation of things.

    Treviño, Hartman and Brown (2000) argue that ethical leadership comprises two aspects: the "ethical person" and the "ethical manager". One must first be an ethical person in order to become an ethical manager. The managerial aspect refers to a leader's intentional efforts to influence others and guide the ethical behaviour of followers – such as communicating ethical standards and disciplining employees who behave unethically.

    Ethical leadership relies on a leader's ability to focus the organization's attention on ethics and values and to infuse the organization with principles that will guide the actions of all employees. Treviño and others also identify three measures that effective ethical managers usually take. First, they serve as a role model for ethical conduct in a way that is visible to employees. Second, they communicate regularly and persuasively with employees about ethical standards, principles and values. Third, they use the reward system consistently to hold all employees accountable to ethical standards.

    The context in which leaders operate should not be ignored. Even an ethical person with ethical intentions can behave unethically due to behavioural dimensions and or systemic pressures. These issues are explored in depth in
    [Modules 6](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-6/index.html),
    [7](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-7/index.html) and
    [8](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-8/index.html). Moreover, ethical leadership may vary in different cultures, including in terms of style and values as well as the manners in which the leader influences followers.

    ###### References

    Ciulla, Joanne B. (2014). Ethics, the Heart of Leadership. 3 rd ed. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.

    Daft, Richard L. (2008). The Leadership Experience. 4 th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage.

    de Hoogh, Annebel H.D., and Deanne N. den Hartog (2009). Ethical leadership: the positive and responsible use of power. In Power and Interdependence in Organizations, Dean Tjosvold and Barbara Wisse, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Eisenbeiss, Silke Astrid (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: an interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 791-808.

    Fleishman, Edwin A. and others (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: a synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 245-287.

    French, John R. P., Jr. and Bertram Raven (1959). The bases of social power. In Studies in social power, ed. Dorwin Cartwright. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Hodges, Christopher and Ruth Steinholtz (2018). Ethical Business Practice and Regulation: A Behavioural and Values-Based Approach to Compliance and Enforcement. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Ng, Thomas W. H., and Daniel C. Feldman (2015). Ethical leadership: meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity.  Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 948-965.

    Northouse, Peter G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. 7th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Schindler, Paul L., and Cher C. Thomas (1993). The structure of interpersonal trust in the workplace. Psychological Reports, vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 563-573.

    Treviño, Linda Klebe, Laura Pincus Hartman and Michael E. Brown (2000). Moral person and moral manager: how executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 128-142.

    Velasquez, Manuel G. (1992). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. 3 rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Page | 7

    ## image1.png

    **## LeadershipandEthicsSummary.docx**

    ###### Leadership and Ethics Summary[footnoteRef:1] [1: Adapted from: The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ]

    **Background on Leadership**

    Leadership has been defined in various ways (Fleishman and others, 1991). One common definition regards leadership as a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2016, p. 16). The following components are central to this definition: (a) leadership is a process, (b) leadership involves influence, (c) leadership occurs in groups, and (d) leadership involves common goals.

    For present purposes, leadership refers to the individuals exerting influence as 'leaders', and to those being influenced as 'followers'. While the distinction between leaders and followers is helpful for illustrative purposes, it should be noted that one can simultaneously be a leader in one context and a follower in another context. It should also be noted that leadership can be formal, such as in the case of an elected prime minister or a company's CEO. But there are also cases of informal leadership, when the influence does not derive from a formal authority conferred through rules and procedures. Finally, it is useful to highlight that leaders can be associated with the world of business, politics, popular culture, and other areas of life.

    Therefore, the three questions to examine are:

    1. What is ethical leadership?

    2.
    Why is ethical leadership important?

    3. How can ethical leadership be promoted?

    1.
    **Ethical Leadership**

    Eisenbeiss (2012) argues that this concept involves setting and pursuing ethical goals and influencing others in an ethical manner. Similarly, De Hoogh and Den Hartog (2009) define ethical leadership as the process of influencing the activities of a group toward goal achievement in a socially responsible way. They focus both on the means through which leaders attempt to achieve goals as well as on the ends themselves.

    The study of ethics generally consists of examining questions about right and wrong, virtue, duty, justice, fairness, and responsibility towards others. From an ethical perspective, according to Ciulla (2014, p. 16), the ultimate point of studying leadership is to answer the question: What is good leadership? The word "good" has two meanings in this context: technically good (or effective) and morally good. This focus on the concept of 'morally good' demonstrates that ethics lies at the heart of leadership studies.

    2.
    **Importance of Ethical Leadership**

    Ethical leadership is important for two main reasons. First, leaders have ethical responsibilities because they have a special position in which they have a greater opportunity to influence others and, therefore, outcomes in significant ways. Most people would agree that all of us have a responsibility to behave ethically, but it is clear that leaders are held to higher ethical standards than followers.

    The values of leaders influence the culture of an organization or society, and whether it behaves ethically or not. Leaders set the tone, develop the vision, and their values and behaviours shape the behaviour those involved in the organization or society. Therefore, leaders have a significant impact on people and societies. Examples of formal and informal leaders from around the world include Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, Malala Yousafzai, Peng Liyuan (First Lady of China), Sheikh Hasina Wajed (Prime Minister of Bangladesh), Yvon Chouinard (the founder of Patagonia), Melinda Gates and Angelina Jolie. However, the impact of a leader is not always positive, as illustrated by Hitler's leadership of Nazi Germany. The impact of his leadership was disastrous for millions of individuals and the world in general.

    On a smaller scale, even team leaders can have profound effects on their team members and the organization. All leaders, no matter how many followers they have, exert power. To exert power over other people carries an ethical responsibility. Power is the ability of one person (or department) in an organization to influence other people to bring about desired outcomes. The greater the power, the more responsibility a leader has. Therefore, leaders at all levels carry a responsibility for setting the ethical tone and for acting as role models for others.

    Contemporary practice and literature is shifting the focus away from traditional leadership styles, such as charismatic and transactional leadership, and is increasingly focusing on leadership styles that emphasize an ethical dimension, such as transformative, servant, value-based or authentic leadership. In other words, what is regarded today as a 'good leader' is someone who effectively leads towards ethical results and not someone who is simply good at leading (as many ill meaning demagogues can be). It has been argued that this development emphasizes the strong links between ethics and effective leadership (Ng and Feldman, 2015).

    Two models can be used to explain the relationship between ethical leadership and effective leadership – the 'interpersonal trust' model and the 'social power' model. The former is attributed to Schindler and Thomas (1993), who argue that interpersonal trust is based on five components: integrity, competence, consistency, loyalty, and openness. Integrity refers to honesty and truthfulness; competence is associated with technical and interpersonal knowledge and skills; consistency is defined as reliability, predictability, and good judgment; loyalty refers to willingness to protect and save face for a person; and openness is the willingness to share ideas and information freely. This model reflects the idea that followers who trust a leader are willing to be vulnerable to the leader's actions because they are confident that their rights and interests will not be abused.

    The 'social power' model was developed by French and Raven (1959), who identified five common and important bases of power: legitimate, coercive, reward, expert, and referent. Legitimate power refers to a person's right to influence another person coupled with the latter's obligation to accept this influence; coercive power derives from having the capacity to penalize or punish others; reward power is about having the capacity to provide rewards to others; expert power is based on the followers' perceptions of the leader's competence; and referent power derives from the followers' identification with and liking of the leader. Each of these bases of power increases a leader's capacity to influence the attitudes, values, or behaviours of others.

    There are three ways in which a follower may react to these forms of power, according to French and Raven (1959). First, when leaders successfully use legitimate or coercive or reward power (collectively referred to as position power) they will generate compliance. Compliance means that people follow the directions of the person with power, whether or not they agree with those directions. The second way in which followers may react to the use of power, especially the use of coercion that exceeds a level people consider legitimate, is to resist the leader's attempt to influence.

    Resistance means that employees will deliberately try to avoid carrying out instructions or they will attempt to disobey orders. The third type of reaction to power is commitment, which is the response most often generated by expert or referent power (collectively referred to as personal power). Commitment means that followers adopt the leader's viewpoint and enthusiastically carry out instructions. Although compliance alone may be enough for routine matters, commitment is particularly important when the leader is promoting change (Daft, 2008, p. 365). In general, people tend to identify with an ethical leader. Ethical leadership is not the sole source of referent power, but it is an important one, particularly in an increasingly changing, globalizing, and transparent world.
    **3. Ethical dimensions of leadership**

    The evaluation of leadership from an ethical point of view is influenced by ethical theories and principles of ethical leadership, as well as by practical questions. Ethical theories provide a system of rules or principles that guide us in making decisions about what is right or wrong and good or bad in a particular situation (Northouse, 2016). There are various theoretical approaches to ethical decision-making. Three of the major Western theories were discussed in
    [Module 1](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-1/index.html): utilitarianism (morality depends on whether the action maximizes the overall social 'utility' or happiness), deontology (morality depends on conformity to moral principles or duties irrespective of the consequences) and virtue ethics (morality depends on perfecting one's character). Practical guidelines for exercising ethical leadership have been created by various scholars. For example, Eisenbeiss (2012) highlights four principles of ethical leadership: humane orientation, justice orientation, responsibility and sustainability orientation, and moderation orientation. Another approach is that of Northouse (2016), who suggests five principles of ethical leadership: respect, service, justice, honesty, and community.

    While theories and principles of ethical leadership are pertinent, practical questions are also important for ethical dilemmas, especially since it is not always feasible to apply a detailed theoretical analysis before making a decision. In this regard, it is helpful to use a checklist to guide decision-making. This is sometimes referred to as "ethics quick tests" or ethical decision-making models, both of which have made their appearance in various guises such as codes of conduct of large corporations.

    The following example of an ethical decision-making model:

    ![Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum: A Pilot Study to Assess Students' Ethical Reasoning – Willey – 2012 – Journal of Legal Studies Education – Wiley Online Library](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/401-leadership-and-ethics-and-exercise-individual)

    Another example is the
    [ethics quick test](http://www.ethics.org.au/about/what-is-ethics) that is provided by The Ethics Center, an Australian-based non-profit organization. The Ethics Center suggests that we ask the following six questions before we make a decision:

    1. Would I be happy for this decision to be headlining the news tomorrow?

    2. Is there a universal rule that applies here?

    3. Will the proposed course of action bring about a good result?

    4. What would happen if everybody did this?

    5. What will this proposed action do to my character or the character of my organization?

    6. Is the proposed course of action consistent with my values and principles?

    Effective leaders are often confronted with impossible dilemmas, where no ideal resolution exists. In such situation leaders need to make difficult decisions that involve sacrificing some goods for the sake of promoting others. A classic example is the decision to go to war, knowing that many people, including civilians, will die. Sometimes this dilemma is known as
    [the dirty hands problem](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dirty-hands/).

    #### Becoming an ethical leader

    The issue of ethical leadership is an ancient one. For example, Aristotle argued that the ethical person in a position of leadership embodies the virtues of courage, temperance, generosity, self-control, honesty, sociability, modesty, fairness, and justice. To Confucius, wisdom, benevolence and courage are the core virtues. Applying ethics to leadership and management, Velasquez (1992) has suggested that managers develop virtues such as perseverance, public-spiritedness, integrity, truthfulness, fidelity, benevolence, and humility. Ethical leadership is also associated with the African concept of the sage. Henry Odera Oruka (1944-1995), from Kenya, researched sage traditions of Sub-Saharan Africa and provided an account of wisdom that is distinctly African. The contemporary South African author Reul Khoza provided accounts of ethical leadership from the perspective of Ubuntu which, among other things, feature a communitarian account of virtue originating in Africa.

    The philosopher Al-Farabi (872-950) provides us insights into ethical leadership from an Islamic perspective. He was born somewhere in modern day Central Asia, and moved throughout the great cities of the Islamic world, such as Baghdad and Damascus. His philosophy was wide ranging, but his insights on leadership can be found in his writings on ethics and politics. In those works, including his famous book The Virtuous City, Al-Farabi argued that leaders should also be philosophers, an idea he drew from the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato. For Al-Farabi, this meant that a leader must not just be a person of action and power, but one who reflects upon what is best for the community which he or she governs. Unlike Plato, he argued that the best city was not a monocultural one, but one which embraced diversity, and the wisest leaders found ways in which peoples of different races and beliefs could live together. Other thinkers have emphasized other sets of virtues, but the differences are not as big as one might think. In fact, people from various cultures may have quite similar views on essential virtues.

    Regarding the development of virtues, according to the Aristotelian way, when virtues are practiced over time, from youth to adulthood, good values become habitual, and part of the people themselves. By telling the truth, people become truthful; by giving to the poor, people become benevolent; by being fair to others, people become just. The Confucian way of cultivating oneself begins with obtaining a deep knowledge of how the world works, moves through taking certain actions and ends with one's most ambitious goal – to illustrate virtue throughout the world. This is strongly connected to the idea that 'knowing', 'doing' and 'being' are three interrelated components of an ethical person. In The Great Learning, written around 500 B.C., and the first of four books selected by Zhu Xi during the Song Dynasty as a foundational introduction to Confucianism,
    [Confucius](http://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/learning.html) described the process as follows:

    The ancients who wished to illustrate illustrious virtue throughout the kingdom first ordered well their own states. Wishing to order well their states, they first regulated their families. Wishing to regulate their families, they first cultivated their persons. Wishing to cultivate their persons, they first rectified their hearts. Wishing to rectify their hearts, they first sought to be sincere in their thoughts. Wishing to be sincere in their thoughts, they first extended to the utmost their knowledge. Such extension of knowledge lay in the investigation of things.

    Treviño, Hartman and Brown (2000) argue that ethical leadership comprises two aspects: the "ethical person" and the "ethical manager". One must first be an ethical person in order to become an ethical manager. The managerial aspect refers to a leader's intentional efforts to influence others and guide the ethical behaviour of followers – such as communicating ethical standards and disciplining employees who behave unethically.

    Ethical leadership relies on a leader's ability to focus the organization's attention on ethics and values and to infuse the organization with principles that will guide the actions of all employees. Treviño and others also identify three measures that effective ethical managers usually take. First, they serve as a role model for ethical conduct in a way that is visible to employees. Second, they communicate regularly and persuasively with employees about ethical standards, principles and values. Third, they use the reward system consistently to hold all employees accountable to ethical standards.

    The context in which leaders operate should not be ignored. Even an ethical person with ethical intentions can behave unethically due to behavioural dimensions and or systemic pressures. These issues are explored in depth in
    [Modules 6](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-6/index.html),
    [7](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-7/index.html) and
    [8](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-8/index.html). Moreover, ethical leadership may vary in different cultures, including in terms of style and values as well as the manners in which the leader influences followers.

    ###### References

    Ciulla, Joanne B. (2014). Ethics, the Heart of Leadership. 3 rd ed. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.

    Daft, Richard L. (2008). The Leadership Experience. 4 th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage.

    de Hoogh, Annebel H.D., and Deanne N. den Hartog (2009). Ethical leadership: the positive and responsible use of power. In Power and Interdependence in Organizations, Dean Tjosvold and Barbara Wisse, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Eisenbeiss, Silke Astrid (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: an interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 791-808.

    Fleishman, Edwin A. and others (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: a synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 245-287.

    French, John R. P., Jr. and Bertram Raven (1959). The bases of social power. In Studies in social power, ed. Dorwin Cartwright. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Hodges, Christopher and Ruth Steinholtz (2018). Ethical Business Practice and Regulation: A Behavioural and Values-Based Approach to Compliance and Enforcement. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Ng, Thomas W. H., and Daniel C. Feldman (2015). Ethical leadership: meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity.  Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 948-965.

    Northouse, Peter G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. 7th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Schindler, Paul L., and Cher C. Thomas (1993). The structure of interpersonal trust in the workplace. Psychological Reports, vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 563-573.

    Treviño, Linda Klebe, Laura Pincus Hartman and Michael E. Brown (2000). Moral person and moral manager: how executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 128-142.

    Velasquez, Manuel G. (1992). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. 3 rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Page | 7

    ## image1.png

    **## PFST401LeadershipandEthicsExerciseIndividual.docx**

    ###### Leadership and Ethics Exercise – Individual

    Complete the questions below[footnoteRef:1]. In the first column, indicate whether you agree or disagree with it. In the second column, indicate whether you think your groupmates would agree or disagree with each item. Think carefully about each item before providing an answer. [1: Adapted from Richard Daft's The Leadership Experience ]

    Name_________________________________

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | ## **Ethics-Related Question** | ## **Me  (Agree / Disagree)** | ## **My Groupmates (Agree / Disagree)** |
    | 1. Overall, it is better to be humble and honest than to be successful and dishonest. | Agree | |
    | 2. If you trust someone completely, you are asking for trouble | Disagree | |
    | 3. A leader should take action only when it is morally right. | Agree | |
    | 4. A good way to handle people is to tell them what they like to hear. | Disagree | |
    | 5. There is no excuse for telling a white lie to someone. | Agree | |
    | 6. It makes sense to flatter important people. | Disagree | |
    | 7. Most people who get ahead as leaders have led very moral lives. | Disagree | |
    | 8. It is better not to tell people the real reason you did something unless it benefits you to do so. | Agree | |
    | 9. The majority of people are brave, good, and kind. | Disagree | |
    | 10. It is hard to get to the top without sometimes cutting corners. | Disagree | |

    **Reflection**

    Page | 2

    **## LeadershipandEthicsSummary.docx**

    ###### Leadership and Ethics Summary[footnoteRef:1] [1: Adapted from: The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ]

    **Background on Leadership**

    Leadership has been defined in various ways (Fleishman and others, 1991). One common definition regards leadership as a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2016, p. 16). The following components are central to this definition: (a) leadership is a process, (b) leadership involves influence, (c) leadership occurs in groups, and (d) leadership involves common goals.

    For present purposes, leadership refers to the individuals exerting influence as 'leaders', and to those being influenced as 'followers'. While the distinction between leaders and followers is helpful for illustrative purposes, it should be noted that one can simultaneously be a leader in one context and a follower in another context. It should also be noted that leadership can be formal, such as in the case of an elected prime minister or a company's CEO. But there are also cases of informal leadership, when the influence does not derive from a formal authority conferred through rules and procedures. Finally, it is useful to highlight that leaders can be associated with the world of business, politics, popular culture, and other areas of life.

    Therefore, the three questions to examine are:

    1. What is ethical leadership?

    2.
    Why is ethical leadership important?

    3. How can ethical leadership be promoted?

    1.
    **Ethical Leadership**

    Eisenbeiss (2012) argues that this concept involves setting and pursuing ethical goals and influencing others in an ethical manner. Similarly, De Hoogh and Den Hartog (2009) define ethical leadership as the process of influencing the activities of a group toward goal achievement in a socially responsible way. They focus both on the means through which leaders attempt to achieve goals as well as on the ends themselves.

    The study of ethics generally consists of examining questions about right and wrong, virtue, duty, justice, fairness, and responsibility towards others. From an ethical perspective, according to Ciulla (2014, p. 16), the ultimate point of studying leadership is to answer the question: What is good leadership? The word "good" has two meanings in this context: technically good (or effective) and morally good. This focus on the concept of 'morally good' demonstrates that ethics lies at the heart of leadership studies.

    2.
    **Importance of Ethical Leadership**

    Ethical leadership is important for two main reasons. First, leaders have ethical responsibilities because they have a special position in which they have a greater opportunity to influence others and, therefore, outcomes in significant ways. Most people would agree that all of us have a responsibility to behave ethically, but it is clear that leaders are held to higher ethical standards than followers.

    The values of leaders influence the culture of an organization or society, and whether it behaves ethically or not. Leaders set the tone, develop the vision, and their values and behaviours shape the behaviour those involved in the organization or society. Therefore, leaders have a significant impact on people and societies. Examples of formal and informal leaders from around the world include Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, Malala Yousafzai, Peng Liyuan (First Lady of China), Sheikh Hasina Wajed (Prime Minister of Bangladesh), Yvon Chouinard (the founder of Patagonia), Melinda Gates and Angelina Jolie. However, the impact of a leader is not always positive, as illustrated by Hitler's leadership of Nazi Germany. The impact of his leadership was disastrous for millions of individuals and the world in general.

    On a smaller scale, even team leaders can have profound effects on their team members and the organization. All leaders, no matter how many followers they have, exert power. To exert power over other people carries an ethical responsibility. Power is the ability of one person (or department) in an organization to influence other people to bring about desired outcomes. The greater the power, the more responsibility a leader has. Therefore, leaders at all levels carry a responsibility for setting the ethical tone and for acting as role models for others.

    Contemporary practice and literature is shifting the focus away from traditional leadership styles, such as charismatic and transactional leadership, and is increasingly focusing on leadership styles that emphasize an ethical dimension, such as transformative, servant, value-based or authentic leadership. In other words, what is regarded today as a 'good leader' is someone who effectively leads towards ethical results and not someone who is simply good at leading (as many ill meaning demagogues can be). It has been argued that this development emphasizes the strong links between ethics and effective leadership (Ng and Feldman, 2015).

    Two models can be used to explain the relationship between ethical leadership and effective leadership – the 'interpersonal trust' model and the 'social power' model. The former is attributed to Schindler and Thomas (1993), who argue that interpersonal trust is based on five components: integrity, competence, consistency, loyalty, and openness. Integrity refers to honesty and truthfulness; competence is associated with technical and interpersonal knowledge and skills; consistency is defined as reliability, predictability, and good judgment; loyalty refers to willingness to protect and save face for a person; and openness is the willingness to share ideas and information freely. This model reflects the idea that followers who trust a leader are willing to be vulnerable to the leader's actions because they are confident that their rights and interests will not be abused.

    The 'social power' model was developed by French and Raven (1959), who identified five common and important bases of power: legitimate, coercive, reward, expert, and referent. Legitimate power refers to a person's right to influence another person coupled with the latter's obligation to accept this influence; coercive power derives from having the capacity to penalize or punish others; reward power is about having the capacity to provide rewards to others; expert power is based on the followers' perceptions of the leader's competence; and referent power derives from the followers' identification with and liking of the leader. Each of these bases of power increases a leader's capacity to influence the attitudes, values, or behaviours of others.

    There are three ways in which a follower may react to these forms of power, according to French and Raven (1959). First, when leaders successfully use legitimate or coercive or reward power (collectively referred to as position power) they will generate compliance. Compliance means that people follow the directions of the person with power, whether or not they agree with those directions. The second way in which followers may react to the use of power, especially the use of coercion that exceeds a level people consider legitimate, is to resist the leader's attempt to influence.

    Resistance means that employees will deliberately try to avoid carrying out instructions or they will attempt to disobey orders. The third type of reaction to power is commitment, which is the response most often generated by expert or referent power (collectively referred to as personal power). Commitment means that followers adopt the leader's viewpoint and enthusiastically carry out instructions. Although compliance alone may be enough for routine matters, commitment is particularly important when the leader is promoting change (Daft, 2008, p. 365). In general, people tend to identify with an ethical leader. Ethical leadership is not the sole source of referent power, but it is an important one, particularly in an increasingly changing, globalizing, and transparent world.
    **3. Ethical dimensions of leadership**

    The evaluation of leadership from an ethical point of view is influenced by ethical theories and principles of ethical leadership, as well as by practical questions. Ethical theories provide a system of rules or principles that guide us in making decisions about what is right or wrong and good or bad in a particular situation (Northouse, 2016). There are various theoretical approaches to ethical decision-making. Three of the major Western theories were discussed in
    [Module 1](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-1/index.html): utilitarianism (morality depends on whether the action maximizes the overall social 'utility' or happiness), deontology (morality depends on conformity to moral principles or duties irrespective of the consequences) and virtue ethics (morality depends on perfecting one's character). Practical guidelines for exercising ethical leadership have been created by various scholars. For example, Eisenbeiss (2012) highlights four principles of ethical leadership: humane orientation, justice orientation, responsibility and sustainability orientation, and moderation orientation. Another approach is that of Northouse (2016), who suggests five principles of ethical leadership: respect, service, justice, honesty, and community.

    While theories and principles of ethical leadership are pertinent, practical questions are also important for ethical dilemmas, especially since it is not always feasible to apply a detailed theoretical analysis before making a decision. In this regard, it is helpful to use a checklist to guide decision-making. This is sometimes referred to as "ethics quick tests" or ethical decision-making models, both of which have made their appearance in various guises such as codes of conduct of large corporations.

    The following example of an ethical decision-making model:

    ![Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum: A Pilot Study to Assess Students' Ethical Reasoning – Willey – 2012 – Journal of Legal Studies Education – Wiley Online Library](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/401-leadership-and-ethics-and-exercise-individual)

    Another example is the
    [ethics quick test](http://www.ethics.org.au/about/what-is-ethics) that is provided by The Ethics Center, an Australian-based non-profit organization. The Ethics Center suggests that we ask the following six questions before we make a decision:

    1. Would I be happy for this decision to be headlining the news tomorrow?

    2. Is there a universal rule that applies here?

    3. Will the proposed course of action bring about a good result?

    4. What would happen if everybody did this?

    5. What will this proposed action do to my character or the character of my organization?

    6. Is the proposed course of action consistent with my values and principles?

    Effective leaders are often confronted with impossible dilemmas, where no ideal resolution exists. In such situation leaders need to make difficult decisions that involve sacrificing some goods for the sake of promoting others. A classic example is the decision to go to war, knowing that many people, including civilians, will die. Sometimes this dilemma is known as
    [the dirty hands problem](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dirty-hands/).

    #### Becoming an ethical leader

    The issue of ethical leadership is an ancient one. For example, Aristotle argued that the ethical person in a position of leadership embodies the virtues of courage, temperance, generosity, self-control, honesty, sociability, modesty, fairness, and justice. To Confucius, wisdom, benevolence and courage are the core virtues. Applying ethics to leadership and management, Velasquez (1992) has suggested that managers develop virtues such as perseverance, public-spiritedness, integrity, truthfulness, fidelity, benevolence, and humility. Ethical leadership is also associated with the African concept of the sage. Henry Odera Oruka (1944-1995), from Kenya, researched sage traditions of Sub-Saharan Africa and provided an account of wisdom that is distinctly African. The contemporary South African author Reul Khoza provided accounts of ethical leadership from the perspective of Ubuntu which, among other things, feature a communitarian account of virtue originating in Africa.

    The philosopher Al-Farabi (872-950) provides us insights into ethical leadership from an Islamic perspective. He was born somewhere in modern day Central Asia, and moved throughout the great cities of the Islamic world, such as Baghdad and Damascus. His philosophy was wide ranging, but his insights on leadership can be found in his writings on ethics and politics. In those works, including his famous book The Virtuous City, Al-Farabi argued that leaders should also be philosophers, an idea he drew from the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato. For Al-Farabi, this meant that a leader must not just be a person of action and power, but one who reflects upon what is best for the community which he or she governs. Unlike Plato, he argued that the best city was not a monocultural one, but one which embraced diversity, and the wisest leaders found ways in which peoples of different races and beliefs could live together. Other thinkers have emphasized other sets of virtues, but the differences are not as big as one might think. In fact, people from various cultures may have quite similar views on essential virtues.

    Regarding the development of virtues, according to the Aristotelian way, when virtues are practiced over time, from youth to adulthood, good values become habitual, and part of the people themselves. By telling the truth, people become truthful; by giving to the poor, people become benevolent; by being fair to others, people become just. The Confucian way of cultivating oneself begins with obtaining a deep knowledge of how the world works, moves through taking certain actions and ends with one's most ambitious goal – to illustrate virtue throughout the world. This is strongly connected to the idea that 'knowing', 'doing' and 'being' are three interrelated components of an ethical person. In The Great Learning, written around 500 B.C., and the first of four books selected by Zhu Xi during the Song Dynasty as a foundational introduction to Confucianism,
    [Confucius](http://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/learning.html) described the process as follows:

    The ancients who wished to illustrate illustrious virtue throughout the kingdom first ordered well their own states. Wishing to order well their states, they first regulated their families. Wishing to regulate their families, they first cultivated their persons. Wishing to cultivate their persons, they first rectified their hearts. Wishing to rectify their hearts, they first sought to be sincere in their thoughts. Wishing to be sincere in their thoughts, they first extended to the utmost their knowledge. Such extension of knowledge lay in the investigation of things.

    Treviño, Hartman and Brown (2000) argue that ethical leadership comprises two aspects: the "ethical person" and the "ethical manager". One must first be an ethical person in order to become an ethical manager. The managerial aspect refers to a leader's intentional efforts to influence others and guide the ethical behaviour of followers – such as communicating ethical standards and disciplining employees who behave unethically.

    Ethical leadership relies on a leader's ability to focus the organization's attention on ethics and values and to infuse the organization with principles that will guide the actions of all employees. Treviño and others also identify three measures that effective ethical managers usually take. First, they serve as a role model for ethical conduct in a way that is visible to employees. Second, they communicate regularly and persuasively with employees about ethical standards, principles and values. Third, they use the reward system consistently to hold all employees accountable to ethical standards.

    The context in which leaders operate should not be ignored. Even an ethical person with ethical intentions can behave unethically due to behavioural dimensions and or systemic pressures. These issues are explored in depth in
    [Modules 6](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-6/index.html),
    [7](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-7/index.html) and
    [8](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-8/index.html). Moreover, ethical leadership may vary in different cultures, including in terms of style and values as well as the manners in which the leader influences followers.

    ###### References

    Ciulla, Joanne B. (2014). Ethics, the Heart of Leadership. 3 rd ed. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.

    Daft, Richard L. (2008). The Leadership Experience. 4 th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage.

    de Hoogh, Annebel H.D., and Deanne N. den Hartog (2009). Ethical leadership: the positive and responsible use of power. In Power and Interdependence in Organizations, Dean Tjosvold and Barbara Wisse, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Eisenbeiss, Silke Astrid (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: an interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 791-808.

    Fleishman, Edwin A. and others (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: a synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 245-287.

    French, John R. P., Jr. and Bertram Raven (1959). The bases of social power. In Studies in social power, ed. Dorwin Cartwright. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Hodges, Christopher and Ruth Steinholtz (2018). Ethical Business Practice and Regulation: A Behavioural and Values-Based Approach to Compliance and Enforcement. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Ng, Thomas W. H., and Daniel C. Feldman (2015). Ethical leadership: meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity.  Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 948-965.

    Northouse, Peter G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. 7th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Schindler, Paul L., and Cher C. Thomas (1993). The structure of interpersonal trust in the workplace. Psychological Reports, vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 563-573.

    Treviño, Linda Klebe, Laura Pincus Hartman and Michael E. Brown (2000). Moral person and moral manager: how executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 128-142.

    Velasquez, Manuel G. (1992). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. 3 rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Page | 7

    ## image1.png

    **## PFST401LeadershipandEthicsExerciseIndividual.docx**

    ###### Leadership and Ethics Exercise – Individual

    Complete the questions below[footnoteRef:1]. In the first column, indicate whether you agree or disagree with it. In the second column, indicate whether you think your groupmates would agree or disagree with each item. Think carefully about each item before providing an answer. [1: Adapted from Richard Daft's The Leadership Experience ]

    Name_________________________________

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | ## **Ethics-Related Question** | ## **Me  (Agree / Disagree)** | ## **My Groupmates (Agree / Disagree)** |
    | 1. Overall, it is better to be humble and honest than to be successful and dishonest. | Agree | |
    | 2. If you trust someone completely, you are asking for trouble | Disagree | |
    | 3. A leader should take action only when it is morally right. | Agree | |
    | 4. A good way to handle people is to tell them what they like to hear. | Disagree | |
    | 5. There is no excuse for telling a white lie to someone. | Agree | |
    | 6. It makes sense to flatter important people. | Disagree | |
    | 7. Most people who get ahead as leaders have led very moral lives. | Disagree | |
    | 8. It is better not to tell people the real reason you did something unless it benefits you to do so. | Agree | |
    | 9. The majority of people are brave, good, and kind. | Disagree | |
    | 10. It is hard to get to the top without sometimes cutting corners. | Disagree | |

    **Reflection**

    Page | 2

    **## LeadershipandEthicsSummary.docx**

    ###### Leadership and Ethics Summary[footnoteRef:1] [1: Adapted from: The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ]

    **Background on Leadership**

    Leadership has been defined in various ways (Fleishman and others, 1991). One common definition regards leadership as a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2016, p. 16). The following components are central to this definition: (a) leadership is a process, (b) leadership involves influence, (c) leadership occurs in groups, and (d) leadership involves common goals.

    For present purposes, leadership refers to the individuals exerting influence as 'leaders', and to those being influenced as 'followers'. While the distinction between leaders and followers is helpful for illustrative purposes, it should be noted that one can simultaneously be a leader in one context and a follower in another context. It should also be noted that leadership can be formal, such as in the case of an elected prime minister or a company's CEO. But there are also cases of informal leadership, when the influence does not derive from a formal authority conferred through rules and procedures. Finally, it is useful to highlight that leaders can be associated with the world of business, politics, popular culture, and other areas of life.

    Therefore, the three questions to examine are:

    1. What is ethical leadership?

    2.
    Why is ethical leadership important?

    3. How can ethical leadership be promoted?

    1.
    **Ethical Leadership**

    Eisenbeiss (2012) argues that this concept involves setting and pursuing ethical goals and influencing others in an ethical manner. Similarly, De Hoogh and Den Hartog (2009) define ethical leadership as the process of influencing the activities of a group toward goal achievement in a socially responsible way. They focus both on the means through which leaders attempt to achieve goals as well as on the ends themselves.

    The study of ethics generally consists of examining questions about right and wrong, virtue, duty, justice, fairness, and responsibility towards others. From an ethical perspective, according to Ciulla (2014, p. 16), the ultimate point of studying leadership is to answer the question: What is good leadership? The word "good" has two meanings in this context: technically good (or effective) and morally good. This focus on the concept of 'morally good' demonstrates that ethics lies at the heart of leadership studies.

    2.
    **Importance of Ethical Leadership**

    Ethical leadership is important for two main reasons. First, leaders have ethical responsibilities because they have a special position in which they have a greater opportunity to influence others and, therefore, outcomes in significant ways. Most people would agree that all of us have a responsibility to behave ethically, but it is clear that leaders are held to higher ethical standards than followers.

    The values of leaders influence the culture of an organization or society, and whether it behaves ethically or not. Leaders set the tone, develop the vision, and their values and behaviours shape the behaviour those involved in the organization or society. Therefore, leaders have a significant impact on people and societies. Examples of formal and informal leaders from around the world include Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, Malala Yousafzai, Peng Liyuan (First Lady of China), Sheikh Hasina Wajed (Prime Minister of Bangladesh), Yvon Chouinard (the founder of Patagonia), Melinda Gates and Angelina Jolie. However, the impact of a leader is not always positive, as illustrated by Hitler's leadership of Nazi Germany. The impact of his leadership was disastrous for millions of individuals and the world in general.

    On a smaller scale, even team leaders can have profound effects on their team members and the organization. All leaders, no matter how many followers they have, exert power. To exert power over other people carries an ethical responsibility. Power is the ability of one person (or department) in an organization to influence other people to bring about desired outcomes. The greater the power, the more responsibility a leader has. Therefore, leaders at all levels carry a responsibility for setting the ethical tone and for acting as role models for others.

    Contemporary practice and literature is shifting the focus away from traditional leadership styles, such as charismatic and transactional leadership, and is increasingly focusing on leadership styles that emphasize an ethical dimension, such as transformative, servant, value-based or authentic leadership. In other words, what is regarded today as a 'good leader' is someone who effectively leads towards ethical results and not someone who is simply good at leading (as many ill meaning demagogues can be). It has been argued that this development emphasizes the strong links between ethics and effective leadership (Ng and Feldman, 2015).

    Two models can be used to explain the relationship between ethical leadership and effective leadership – the 'interpersonal trust' model and the 'social power' model. The former is attributed to Schindler and Thomas (1993), who argue that interpersonal trust is based on five components: integrity, competence, consistency, loyalty, and openness. Integrity refers to honesty and truthfulness; competence is associated with technical and interpersonal knowledge and skills; consistency is defined as reliability, predictability, and good judgment; loyalty refers to willingness to protect and save face for a person; and openness is the willingness to share ideas and information freely. This model reflects the idea that followers who trust a leader are willing to be vulnerable to the leader's actions because they are confident that their rights and interests will not be abused.

    The 'social power' model was developed by French and Raven (1959), who identified five common and important bases of power: legitimate, coercive, reward, expert, and referent. Legitimate power refers to a person's right to influence another person coupled with the latter's obligation to accept this influence; coercive power derives from having the capacity to penalize or punish others; reward power is about having the capacity to provide rewards to others; expert power is based on the followers' perceptions of the leader's competence; and referent power derives from the followers' identification with and liking of the leader. Each of these bases of power increases a leader's capacity to influence the attitudes, values, or behaviours of others.

    There are three ways in which a follower may react to these forms of power, according to French and Raven (1959). First, when leaders successfully use legitimate or coercive or reward power (collectively referred to as position power) they will generate compliance. Compliance means that people follow the directions of the person with power, whether or not they agree with those directions. The second way in which followers may react to the use of power, especially the use of coercion that exceeds a level people consider legitimate, is to resist the leader's attempt to influence.

    Resistance means that employees will deliberately try to avoid carrying out instructions or they will attempt to disobey orders. The third type of reaction to power is commitment, which is the response most often generated by expert or referent power (collectively referred to as personal power). Commitment means that followers adopt the leader's viewpoint and enthusiastically carry out instructions. Although compliance alone may be enough for routine matters, commitment is particularly important when the leader is promoting change (Daft, 2008, p. 365). In general, people tend to identify with an ethical leader. Ethical leadership is not the sole source of referent power, but it is an important one, particularly in an increasingly changing, globalizing, and transparent world.
    **3. Ethical dimensions of leadership**

    The evaluation of leadership from an ethical point of view is influenced by ethical theories and principles of ethical leadership, as well as by practical questions. Ethical theories provide a system of rules or principles that guide us in making decisions about what is right or wrong and good or bad in a particular situation (Northouse, 2016). There are various theoretical approaches to ethical decision-making. Three of the major Western theories were discussed in
    [Module 1](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-1/index.html): utilitarianism (morality depends on whether the action maximizes the overall social 'utility' or happiness), deontology (morality depends on conformity to moral principles or duties irrespective of the consequences) and virtue ethics (morality depends on perfecting one's character). Practical guidelines for exercising ethical leadership have been created by various scholars. For example, Eisenbeiss (2012) highlights four principles of ethical leadership: humane orientation, justice orientation, responsibility and sustainability orientation, and moderation orientation. Another approach is that of Northouse (2016), who suggests five principles of ethical leadership: respect, service, justice, honesty, and community.

    While theories and principles of ethical leadership are pertinent, practical questions are also important for ethical dilemmas, especially since it is not always feasible to apply a detailed theoretical analysis before making a decision. In this regard, it is helpful to use a checklist to guide decision-making. This is sometimes referred to as "ethics quick tests" or ethical decision-making models, both of which have made their appearance in various guises such as codes of conduct of large corporations.

    The following example of an ethical decision-making model:

    ![Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum: A Pilot Study to Assess Students' Ethical Reasoning – Willey – 2012 – Journal of Legal Studies Education – Wiley Online Library](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/401-leadership-and-ethics-and-exercise-individual)

    Another example is the
    [ethics quick test](http://www.ethics.org.au/about/what-is-ethics) that is provided by The Ethics Center, an Australian-based non-profit organization. The Ethics Center suggests that we ask the following six questions before we make a decision:

    1. Would I be happy for this decision to be headlining the news tomorrow?

    2. Is there a universal rule that applies here?

    3. Will the proposed course of action bring about a good result?

    4. What would happen if everybody did this?

    5. What will this proposed action do to my character or the character of my organization?

    6. Is the proposed course of action consistent with my values and principles?

    Effective leaders are often confronted with impossible dilemmas, where no ideal resolution exists. In such situation leaders need to make difficult decisions that involve sacrificing some goods for the sake of promoting others. A classic example is the decision to go to war, knowing that many people, including civilians, will die. Sometimes this dilemma is known as
    [the dirty hands problem](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dirty-hands/).

    #### Becoming an ethical leader

    The issue of ethical leadership is an ancient one. For example, Aristotle argued that the ethical person in a position of leadership embodies the virtues of courage, temperance, generosity, self-control, honesty, sociability, modesty, fairness, and justice. To Confucius, wisdom, benevolence and courage are the core virtues. Applying ethics to leadership and management, Velasquez (1992) has suggested that managers develop virtues such as perseverance, public-spiritedness, integrity, truthfulness, fidelity, benevolence, and humility. Ethical leadership is also associated with the African concept of the sage. Henry Odera Oruka (1944-1995), from Kenya, researched sage traditions of Sub-Saharan Africa and provided an account of wisdom that is distinctly African. The contemporary South African author Reul Khoza provided accounts of ethical leadership from the perspective of Ubuntu which, among other things, feature a communitarian account of virtue originating in Africa.

    The philosopher Al-Farabi (872-950) provides us insights into ethical leadership from an Islamic perspective. He was born somewhere in modern day Central Asia, and moved throughout the great cities of the Islamic world, such as Baghdad and Damascus. His philosophy was wide ranging, but his insights on leadership can be found in his writings on ethics and politics. In those works, including his famous book The Virtuous City, Al-Farabi argued that leaders should also be philosophers, an idea he drew from the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato. For Al-Farabi, this meant that a leader must not just be a person of action and power, but one who reflects upon what is best for the community which he or she governs. Unlike Plato, he argued that the best city was not a monocultural one, but one which embraced diversity, and the wisest leaders found ways in which peoples of different races and beliefs could live together. Other thinkers have emphasized other sets of virtues, but the differences are not as big as one might think. In fact, people from various cultures may have quite similar views on essential virtues.

    Regarding the development of virtues, according to the Aristotelian way, when virtues are practiced over time, from youth to adulthood, good values become habitual, and part of the people themselves. By telling the truth, people become truthful; by giving to the poor, people become benevolent; by being fair to others, people become just. The Confucian way of cultivating oneself begins with obtaining a deep knowledge of how the world works, moves through taking certain actions and ends with one's most ambitious goal – to illustrate virtue throughout the world. This is strongly connected to the idea that 'knowing', 'doing' and 'being' are three interrelated components of an ethical person. In The Great Learning, written around 500 B.C., and the first of four books selected by Zhu Xi during the Song Dynasty as a foundational introduction to Confucianism,
    [Confucius](http://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/learning.html) described the process as follows:

    The ancients who wished to illustrate illustrious virtue throughout the kingdom first ordered well their own states. Wishing to order well their states, they first regulated their families. Wishing to regulate their families, they first cultivated their persons. Wishing to cultivate their persons, they first rectified their hearts. Wishing to rectify their hearts, they first sought to be sincere in their thoughts. Wishing to be sincere in their thoughts, they first extended to the utmost their knowledge. Such extension of knowledge lay in the investigation of things.

    Treviño, Hartman and Brown (2000) argue that ethical leadership comprises two aspects: the "ethical person" and the "ethical manager". One must first be an ethical person in order to become an ethical manager. The managerial aspect refers to a leader's intentional efforts to influence others and guide the ethical behaviour of followers – such as communicating ethical standards and disciplining employees who behave unethically.

    Ethical leadership relies on a leader's ability to focus the organization's attention on ethics and values and to infuse the organization with principles that will guide the actions of all employees. Treviño and others also identify three measures that effective ethical managers usually take. First, they serve as a role model for ethical conduct in a way that is visible to employees. Second, they communicate regularly and persuasively with employees about ethical standards, principles and values. Third, they use the reward system consistently to hold all employees accountable to ethical standards.

    The context in which leaders operate should not be ignored. Even an ethical person with ethical intentions can behave unethically due to behavioural dimensions and or systemic pressures. These issues are explored in depth in
    [Modules 6](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-6/index.html),
    [7](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-7/index.html) and
    [8](https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/integrity-ethics/module-8/index.html). Moreover, ethical leadership may vary in different cultures, including in terms of style and values as well as the manners in which the leader influences followers.

    ###### References

    Ciulla, Joanne B. (2014). Ethics, the Heart of Leadership. 3 rd ed. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.

    Daft, Richard L. (2008). The Leadership Experience. 4 th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage.

    de Hoogh, Annebel H.D., and Deanne N. den Hartog (2009). Ethical leadership: the positive and responsible use of power. In Power and Interdependence in Organizations, Dean Tjosvold and Barbara Wisse, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Eisenbeiss, Silke Astrid (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: an interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 791-808.

    Fleishman, Edwin A. and others (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: a synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 245-287.

    French, John R. P., Jr. and Bertram Raven (1959). The bases of social power. In Studies in social power, ed. Dorwin Cartwright. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Hodges, Christopher and Ruth Steinholtz (2018). Ethical Business Practice and Regulation: A Behavioural and Values-Based Approach to Compliance and Enforcement. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Ng, Thomas W. H., and Daniel C. Feldman (2015). Ethical leadership: meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity.  Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 948-965.

    Northouse, Peter G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. 7th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Schindler, Paul L., and Cher C. Thomas (1993). The structure of interpersonal trust in the workplace. Psychological Reports, vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 563-573.

    Treviño, Linda Klebe, Laura Pincus Hartman and Michael E. Brown (2000). Moral person and moral manager: how executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 128-142.

    Velasquez, Manuel G. (1992). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. 3 rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Page | 7

    ## image1.png

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] NUR – 504 Module 3 Discussion CASE 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    NUR – 504 Module 3 Discussion CASE 1

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    NUR – 504 Module 3 Discussion CASE 1

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    How do drugs affect the brain’s Central Nervous System? In your explanation, list and describe at least one technical term listed in Chapter 3. **Instructions:** All critical reflection assignments should be at least 1.5 pages, include one scholarly citation,

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    How do drugs affect the brain’s Central Nervous System?  In your explanation, list and describe at least one technical term listed in Chapter 3.
    **Instructions:**
    All critical reflection assignments should be at least 1.5 pages, include one scholarly citation,

  • [Solved] Week 5 Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Reflect on actions you believe can promote economic growth and stability within the US economy. Consider what policies, programs or strategies could help strengthen economic growth? how might these actions address current challenges such as inflation unemployment or slow GDP growth? should the gover…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Reflect on actions you believe can promote economic growth and stability within the US economy.
    Consider what policies, programs or strategies could help strengthen economic growth?
    how might these actions address current challenges such as inflation unemployment or slow GDP growth?
    should the government businesses or consumers play a larger role in promoting economic stability
    Minimum 150 words, APA cited references if there are any.

  • [Solved] 401 Week 3 Journal Write-up

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_0413.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0413-jpeg-10396167 "IMG_0413.jpeg") \ IMG_0411.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0411-png "IMG_0411.png") \ IMG_0412.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0412-png "IMG_0412.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_0413.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0413-jpeg-10396167 "IMG_0413.jpeg")
    \
    IMG_0411.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0411-png "IMG_0411.png")
    \
    IMG_0412.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0412-png "IMG_0412.png")