My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] WK 9 BLOG THOE

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WK9BLOGTHOE.docx **## WK9BLOGTHOE.docx** BLOG: PEER FEEDBACK: PRACTICE QUESTIONS AND SEARCH STRATEGIES ![A network of red threads Description automatically generated with medium confidence](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-9-blog-thoe) For this Blog, you will …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK9BLOGTHOE.docx

    **## WK9BLOGTHOE.docx**

    BLOG: PEER FEEDBACK: PRACTICE QUESTIONS AND SEARCH STRATEGIES

    ![A network of red threads Description automatically generated with medium confidence](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-9-blog-thoe)

    For this Blog, you will share your progress, thus far, on the Literature Review Assignment that you are currently working on. Specifically, you will share your proposed practice question, PICOT format, and proposed search strategies. This is a unique opportunity to receive valuable feedback from your colleagues, which you can incorporate to improve your Assignment.

    By the end of the week, please reflect upon the feedback you received. Apply

    whatever feedback you find valuable as you work toward completing your Literature Review Assignment. This Assignment is due by
    **Day 7 of Week 10**.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/modules/items/5646756)

    Learning Resources

    [Required Readings: Literature Review Assignment Resources](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/pages/week-9-learning-resources?module_item_id=5646756)

    **Note:** These resources were previously presented in Week 8.

    · Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).
    _Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines_ (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

    · Chapter 5, “Searching for Evidence” (pp. 99–128)

    · Chapter 6, “Evidence Appraisal: Research” (pp. 129–162)

    · Chapter 7, “Evidence Appraisal: Nonresearch” (pp. 163–188)

    ·
    [Appendix B, “Question Development Tool” (pp. 283–288)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137325?wrap=1) [Download Appendix B, “Question Development Tool” (pp. 283–288)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137325/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    [Appendix E, “Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” (pp. 297–306)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137324?wrap=1) [Download Appendix E, “Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” (pp. 297–306)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137324/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    [Appendix F, “Nonresearch Evidence Appraisal Tool” (pp. 307–314)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137332?wrap=1) [Download Appendix F, “Nonresearch Evidence Appraisal Tool” (pp. 307–314)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137332/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    [Appendix G, “Individual Evidence Summary Tool” (pp. 315–316)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137334?wrap=1) [Download Appendix G, “Individual Evidence Summary Tool” (pp. 315–316)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137334/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    [Appendix H, “Synthesis and Recommendations Tool (pp. 319–323)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137335?wrap=1) [Download Appendix H, “Synthesis and Recommendations Tool (pp. 319–323)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137335/download?download_frd=1)

    **Note:** Be prepared to complete and submit Appendices B, G, and H for your Assignment this week.

    **Also Note:** You previously purchased this text for NURS 8002.

    · Bermudez, N. (2021).
    [Formulating well-written clinical practice questions and research questionsLinks to an external site.](https://scholarlycommons.baptisthealth.net/nhsrj/vol4/iss1/10/).
    _Nursing and Health Sciences Research Journal, 4_(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.55481/2578-3750.1113

    · Echevarria, I. M., & Walker, S. (2014).
    [To make your case, start with a PICOT questionLinks to an external site.](https://access.ovid.com/custom/redirector/index.html?dest=https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00152193-201402000-00007&D=ovft).
    _Nursing, 44_(2), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000442594.00242.f9

    · Ford, L. G., & Melnyk, B. M. (2019).
    [The underappreciated and misunderstood PICOT question: A critical step in the EBP processLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=rzh&AN=140231445&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16_(6), 422–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12408

    **Note:** The following resources also appear in NURS 8002.

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Analyze and evaluate research articles_ Links to an external site.](https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/analyze-evaluate-research-articles) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/analyze-evaluate-research-articles

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Break a topic into keywordsLinks to an external site._](https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/topic-into-keywords) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/topic-into-keywords

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Evaluate resourcesLinks to an external site._](https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/evaluate-resources)[Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/evaluate-resources

    · OASIS.
    [_Grading evidence_ Links to an external site.](https://rise.articulate.com/share/–e-gVRMA_y8V2KffxxJAQNb_lswZ2zX) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://rise.articulate.com/share/–e-gVRMA_y8V2KffxxJAQNb_lswZ2zX

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Locate, cite, and reference journal articlesLinks to an external site._](https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/locate-cite-reference-articles) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/locate-cite-reference-articles

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Paraphrase and summarize informationLinks to an external site._](https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/paraphrase-summarize) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/paraphrase-summarize

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Synthesis_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence/synthesis) [Multimedia]. Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence/synthesis

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Synthesize literature_ Links to an external site.](https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/synthesize-literature) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/synthesize-literature

    · Walden University. (2021).
    [_DNP glossary_ Links to an external site.](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/8114/DNPG/index.html) [Interactive media]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    · Walden University Library. (n.d.).
    [_Ask a librarian_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/ask%20). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/ask
    Note: Use this website to find answers to common questions or to contact a librarian directly.

    · Walden University Library. (n.d.).
    [_Databases A–Z: Nursing_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

    · Walden University Library. (n.d.).
    [_Evaluating resources: Primary and secondary sources_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources

    · Walden University Library. (n.d.).
    [_Subject research: NursingLinks to an external site._](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

    **Note:** This database is a good starting point for nursing related searches.

    · Walden University Quick Answers. (n.d.).
    [_How do I verify that my article is peer reviewed?_ Links to an external site.](https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72613) [Multimedia]. https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72613

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/modules/items/5646754) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/modules/items/5646759)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## WK9BLOGTHOE.docx**

    BLOG: PEER FEEDBACK: PRACTICE QUESTIONS AND SEARCH STRATEGIES

    ![A network of red threads Description automatically generated with medium confidence](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-9-blog-thoe)

    For this Blog, you will share your progress, thus far, on the Literature Review Assignment that you are currently working on. Specifically, you will share your proposed practice question, PICOT format, and proposed search strategies. This is a unique opportunity to receive valuable feedback from your colleagues, which you can incorporate to improve your Assignment.

    By the end of the week, please reflect upon the feedback you received. Apply

    whatever feedback you find valuable as you work toward completing your Literature Review Assignment. This Assignment is due by
    **Day 7 of Week 10**.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/modules/items/5646756)

    Learning Resources

    [Required Readings: Literature Review Assignment Resources](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/pages/week-9-learning-resources?module_item_id=5646756)

    **Note:** These resources were previously presented in Week 8.

    · Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).
    _Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines_ (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

    · Chapter 5, “Searching for Evidence” (pp. 99–128)

    · Chapter 6, “Evidence Appraisal: Research” (pp. 129–162)

    · Chapter 7, “Evidence Appraisal: Nonresearch” (pp. 163–188)

    ·
    [Appendix B, “Question Development Tool” (pp. 283–288)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137325?wrap=1) [Download Appendix B, “Question Development Tool” (pp. 283–288)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137325/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    [Appendix E, “Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” (pp. 297–306)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137324?wrap=1) [Download Appendix E, “Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” (pp. 297–306)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137324/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    [Appendix F, “Nonresearch Evidence Appraisal Tool” (pp. 307–314)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137332?wrap=1) [Download Appendix F, “Nonresearch Evidence Appraisal Tool” (pp. 307–314)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137332/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    [Appendix G, “Individual Evidence Summary Tool” (pp. 315–316)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137334?wrap=1) [Download Appendix G, “Individual Evidence Summary Tool” (pp. 315–316)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137334/download?download_frd=1)

    ·
    [Appendix H, “Synthesis and Recommendations Tool (pp. 319–323)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137335?wrap=1) [Download Appendix H, “Synthesis and Recommendations Tool (pp. 319–323)](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/files/11137335/download?download_frd=1)

    **Note:** Be prepared to complete and submit Appendices B, G, and H for your Assignment this week.

    **Also Note:** You previously purchased this text for NURS 8002.

    · Bermudez, N. (2021).
    [Formulating well-written clinical practice questions and research questionsLinks to an external site.](https://scholarlycommons.baptisthealth.net/nhsrj/vol4/iss1/10/).
    _Nursing and Health Sciences Research Journal, 4_(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.55481/2578-3750.1113

    · Echevarria, I. M., & Walker, S. (2014).
    [To make your case, start with a PICOT questionLinks to an external site.](https://access.ovid.com/custom/redirector/index.html?dest=https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00152193-201402000-00007&D=ovft).
    _Nursing, 44_(2), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000442594.00242.f9

    · Ford, L. G., & Melnyk, B. M. (2019).
    [The underappreciated and misunderstood PICOT question: A critical step in the EBP processLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=rzh&AN=140231445&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16_(6), 422–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12408

    **Note:** The following resources also appear in NURS 8002.

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Analyze and evaluate research articles_ Links to an external site.](https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/analyze-evaluate-research-articles) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/analyze-evaluate-research-articles

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Break a topic into keywordsLinks to an external site._](https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/topic-into-keywords) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/topic-into-keywords

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Evaluate resourcesLinks to an external site._](https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/evaluate-resources)[Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/evaluate-resources

    · OASIS.
    [_Grading evidence_ Links to an external site.](https://rise.articulate.com/share/–e-gVRMA_y8V2KffxxJAQNb_lswZ2zX) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://rise.articulate.com/share/–e-gVRMA_y8V2KffxxJAQNb_lswZ2zX

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Locate, cite, and reference journal articlesLinks to an external site._](https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/locate-cite-reference-articles) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/library/locate-cite-reference-articles

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Paraphrase and summarize informationLinks to an external site._](https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/paraphrase-summarize) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/paraphrase-summarize

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Synthesis_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence/synthesis) [Multimedia]. Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence/synthesis

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    [_Synthesize literature_ Links to an external site.](https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/synthesize-literature) [Interactive media]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/synthesize-literature

    · Walden University. (2021).
    [_DNP glossary_ Links to an external site.](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/8114/DNPG/index.html) [Interactive media]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com

    · Walden University Library. (n.d.).
    [_Ask a librarian_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/ask%20). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/ask
    Note: Use this website to find answers to common questions or to contact a librarian directly.

    · Walden University Library. (n.d.).
    [_Databases A–Z: Nursing_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

    · Walden University Library. (n.d.).
    [_Evaluating resources: Primary and secondary sources_ Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources

    · Walden University Library. (n.d.).
    [_Subject research: NursingLinks to an external site._](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

    **Note:** This database is a good starting point for nursing related searches.

    · Walden University Quick Answers. (n.d.).
    [_How do I verify that my article is peer reviewed?_ Links to an external site.](https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72613) [Multimedia]. https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72613

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/modules/items/5646754) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/modules/items/5646759)

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] Week 1 Pt 1 Opportunity Analysis or Brief Project Proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In this unit, it is important for you to clearly identify the path that you've chosen, whether it is Track A, or B or C. In doing that, I'm asking you to develop either the Opportunity Analysis for Track A or the Proposal format for Track B or C. It is important to have a starting point for you to b…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In this unit, it is important for you to clearly identify the path that you've chosen, whether it is Track A, or B or C. In doing that, I'm asking you to develop either the Opportunity Analysis for Track A or the Proposal format for Track B or C.

    It is important to have a starting point for you to begin to flush out your thinking. This will give me the opportunity then to meet with you and talk further about your plan. I can imagine that after we meet this week, and after you complete these proposals, we can meet individually and not necessarily have class but discuss the potential individually and what next steps would be.

    I want to make sure that you are crystal clear on what next steps are. I look forward to seeing you! God bless you!

    _**Track A – Opportunity Analysis:**_

    – Your Name
    – Business Name?
    – Problem you are solving?
    – Business Product / Service & type of business?
    – Target Market / Segment – who are your customers, what is their unmet need, what is your solution?
    – Industry Analysis / Competition – attributes of competitors and what distinctives you are providing?
    – Competitive Advantages your approach will have?
    – Business Model / Sales Strategy – How will you identify and acquire customers?
    – Positioning Statement / Message – part strategy, part market niche – what are you telling customers about your concept?
    – Channel(s) to Customers? How will customers get access to your product/service?
    – Revenue streams – from where will the money come (sources)?

    _**Track B Proposal**_

    – Your Name(s):
    – Name of Proposal:
    – Type of Proposal: Comprehensive Business Problem Solution with Recommendations: Goals
    – Partner Organization [with what business will you be working?]
    – Clearly define the Problem:
    – Relevant Background information:
    – Scope of the problem: why is this important?
    – Why is this action being taken at this time?
    – What are the deliverables or what is the outcome you are seeking?
    – Do you have the necessary resources to complete this project? If not from where will you acquire them?
    – What else do you need from (business partner or your professor) in order to get started?

    _**Track C Proposal**_

    – Your Name(s):
    – Name of Proposal:
    – Type of Proposal: Due Diligence Assessment with Recommendations: Objectives
    – Partner Organization [with what business will you be working?]
    – Clearly describe the Organization:
    – Relevant Background information:
    – Scope of the assessment: why is this important?
    – Why is this action being taken at this time?
    – What are the deliverables or what is the outcome you are seeking?
    – Do you have the necessary resources to complete this project? If not from where will you acquire them?
    – What else do you need from (business partner or your professor) in order to get started?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] W2660

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Physiology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-physiology) Provide connection between the changes in HC leadership practices and expectations and participation in professional membership groups, grass roots organizations and lobbyists – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Physiology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-physiology)

    Provide connection between the changes in HC leadership practices and expectations and participation in professional membership groups, grass roots organizations and lobbyists

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Validating a Resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Validating a Resource** – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx – ## Module3.docx **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx** HIM377 Project Milestone Validating a Resource Name: Directions: Using the space provided below, you wi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Validating a Resource**

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx

    – ## Module3.docx

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

    **## HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx**

    HIM377 Project Milestone

    Validating a Resource

    Name:

    Directions:

    Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

    1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    Title:

    Author(s):

    Date Published:

    2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

    **## Module3.docx**

    **Module 2: Project Milestone – Validating a Resource**

    For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

    Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

    [Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414?wrap=1) [Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/files/17664414/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=10038&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F2f063cb2-6e37-4e18-927f-993462478f17%2FHIM377%2520Project%2520Milestone%2520Validating%2520a%2520Resource%2520template.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3MzcyMzIxMzksInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzJmMDYzY2IyLTZlMzctNGUxOC05MjdmLTk5MzQ2MjQ3OGYxNy9ISU0zNzclMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwTWlsZXN0b25lJTIwVmFsaWRhdGluZyUyMGElMjBSZXNvdXJjZSUyMHRlbXBsYXRlLmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiI2N2Q1NDhlYS1jMzgwLTQ5Y2MtYjliYy00Zjk4NDEyZmQwNDkiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3MzczMTg1Mzl9.sdT_IcLXAxcPNJY6EHmVUVQZb2KHFlydUxrV9NwCXhw_isd8e1Jvl7h_sU434l0TMWXm0-CqzbQbK6l1EaXrRg)

    · Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

    · Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

    · Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

    Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

    **Action**

    Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

    Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

    **Rubric**

    **Milestone Validate a Resource**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Milestone Validate a Resource |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information<br>-Source Information<br>-title of book or article<br>-author(s)<br>-date published | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published | **3 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published | **1 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment<br>Source Relevance Assessment<br>-Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source<br>-Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **7 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria | **5 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **2 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria | | 7 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation<br>Source Validation<br>-Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication?<br>-Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)? | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **8 pts**<br>**Meets or Exceeds**<br>Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information | **6 pts**<br>**In Progress**<br>Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information | **3 pts**<br>**Little Evidence**<br>Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information | **0 pts**<br>**No Evidence**<br>Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria | | 8 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    [Previous](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516728) [Next](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/modules/items/15516744)

    [Top](https://devryu.instructure.com/courses/118470/assignments/3787144?module_item_id=15516737)

  • [Solved] using PCgive to do Econometrics work 48hous

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Economics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-economics) Testing the PPP for the Pound Sterling / US dollarWrite a two page paper, excluding charts and regression results, assessing the empirical support for PPP for the US Dollar – British pound: 1791-2015 Formulate a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Economics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-economics)

    Testing the PPP for the Pound Sterling / US dollarWrite a two page paper, excluding charts and regression results, assessing the empirical support for PPP for the US Dollar – British pound: 1791-2015

    Formulate a model that allows testing whether PPP holds

    Estimate the parameters of that model using the files in the Data for Pound Sterling and PPP

    Report

    the test result for PPP the fit of the model

    the assumed parameter constancy

    the sensitivity to whether the variables are expressed in logs or  not

    you should have pcgive software, if you dont i have to send you, is a 300mb file

    – [\
    \
    BoE_PPP.bn7](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/boe-ppp-bn7-10159819 "BoE_PPP.bn7")
    – [\
    \
    BoE_PPP.in7](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/boe-ppp-in7-10159821 "BoE_PPP.in7")
    – [\
    \
    BoE_PPP.oxdata](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/boe-ppp-oxdata-10159823 "BoE_PPP.oxdata")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] United States Preventive Service Taskforce

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following: – Cervical cancer – Breast cancer – Osteoporosis – Colorectal cancer – Lung cancer – Ovarian cancer – Intimate partner violence (IPV). – [\ \ S…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following:

    – Cervical cancer
    – Breast cancer
    – Osteoporosis
    – Colorectal cancer
    – Lung cancer
    – Ovarian cancer
    – Intimate partner violence (IPV).

    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-01-19at2.59.58AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-19at2-59-58am-png "ScreenShot2025-01-19at2.59.58AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-01-19at3.00.13AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-19at3-00-13am-png "ScreenShot2025-01-19at3.00.13AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-01-19at3.00.20AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-01-19at3-00-20am-png "ScreenShot2025-01-19at3.00.20AM.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Transportation paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) help with 3-5 paper – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    help with 3-5 paper

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Test 1: gradient descent issues

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Machine Learning homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science-machine-learning) For each of the following assertions, support your answer with examples or counterexamples: 1. For any local-search problem, hill-climbing will return a global optimum if the algorithm is run start…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Machine Learning homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science-machine-learning)

    For each of the following assertions, support your answer with examples or counterexamples:

    1. For any local-search problem, hill-climbing will return a global optimum if the algorithm is run starting at any state that is a neighbor of a neighbor of a globally optimal state.
    2. In a nondeterministic, partially observable problem, improving an agent’s transition model (i.e., eliminating spurious outcomes that never actually occur) will never increase the size of the agent’s belief states.
    3. Stochastic hill climbing is guaranteed to arrive at a global optimum.
    4. In a continuous space, gradient descent with a fixed step size is guaranteed to converge to a local or global optimum.
    5. Gradient descent finds the global optimum from any starting point if and only if the function is convex.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Research psych smoking study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## psych350week1.docx **## psych350week1.docx** Read the hypothetical study and discuss any problems you find with the way in which the study was conducted, the author's conclusions, or the way in which the article was written. **Effect of Smoking on Management Performa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## psych350week1.docx

    **## psych350week1.docx**

    Read the hypothetical study and discuss any problems you find with the way in which the study was conducted, the author's conclusions, or the way in which the article was written.

    **Effect of Smoking on Management Performance**

    **Winston Butts Vantage University**

    In recent years, many organizations have implemented programs to encourage employees to stop smoking (Ash, 1971). This movement toward decreasing smoking in the workplace is an attempt to reduce health care costs as well as satisfy the rights of nonsmokers (Butts, 1975).

    However, research on the effects of these programs is mixed. Whereas some studies support the idea of financial savings (e.g., Stogie, 1970), others have shown no improvements in employee health or increases in organizational profits. Because of this lack of consistency, it is the purpose of the present study to determine if smoking might actually increase performance.

    Method

    **Participants**

        The participants in the study were 15 managers employed by a large manufacturer of munitions and blasting caps. Eight of the managers smoked at work, and seven of the managers were nonsmokers. Ten of the managers were women and five were men. The mean age of the managers was 36.3, with the youngest being 21 and the oldest 65.

    Procedure

        The experimenter spent 10 days at the organization observing the 15 managers. Each time a manager did something right, he was given a point. Each time a manager did something wrong, a point was deducted. At the end of the 10 days, a manager's performance was determined by his total number of points.

    Results and Discussion

         The managers' performance scores were correlated with their smoking status. The results of this analysis indicated a correlation coefficient of .20. Though the correlation coefficient was not statistically significant, it was in the predicted direction. In other words, managers who smoked performed better than those who did not. Thus, the results of this study indicate that smoking causes better managerial performance.

         One reason for this finding might be that smoking allows a manager to calm down when he is anxious, thus resulting in better performance (Puffer, 1971). Another reason might be that smoking is a sign of status and maturity (Burns, 1978) and good managers smoke to enhance their image. On the basis of the results of this study, organizations should either hire managers who smoke or get their nonsmoking managers to start smoking.

    **## psych350week1.docx**

    Read the hypothetical study and discuss any problems you find with the way in which the study was conducted, the author's conclusions, or the way in which the article was written.

    **Effect of Smoking on Management Performance**

    **Winston Butts Vantage University**

    In recent years, many organizations have implemented programs to encourage employees to stop smoking (Ash, 1971). This movement toward decreasing smoking in the workplace is an attempt to reduce health care costs as well as satisfy the rights of nonsmokers (Butts, 1975).

    However, research on the effects of these programs is mixed. Whereas some studies support the idea of financial savings (e.g., Stogie, 1970), others have shown no improvements in employee health or increases in organizational profits. Because of this lack of consistency, it is the purpose of the present study to determine if smoking might actually increase performance.

    Method

    **Participants**

        The participants in the study were 15 managers employed by a large manufacturer of munitions and blasting caps. Eight of the managers smoked at work, and seven of the managers were nonsmokers. Ten of the managers were women and five were men. The mean age of the managers was 36.3, with the youngest being 21 and the oldest 65.

    Procedure

        The experimenter spent 10 days at the organization observing the 15 managers. Each time a manager did something right, he was given a point. Each time a manager did something wrong, a point was deducted. At the end of the 10 days, a manager's performance was determined by his total number of points.

    Results and Discussion

         The managers' performance scores were correlated with their smoking status. The results of this analysis indicated a correlation coefficient of .20. Though the correlation coefficient was not statistically significant, it was in the predicted direction. In other words, managers who smoked performed better than those who did not. Thus, the results of this study indicate that smoking causes better managerial performance.

         One reason for this finding might be that smoking allows a manager to calm down when he is anxious, thus resulting in better performance (Puffer, 1971). Another reason might be that smoking is a sign of status and maturity (Burns, 1978) and good managers smoke to enhance their image. On the basis of the results of this study, organizations should either hire managers who smoke or get their nonsmoking managers to start smoking.

  • [Solved] discussion 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering discussion 3.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.