[Solved] week9

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

please see attached.

– 2 years ago

**files (1)**

– ## week9.docx

**## week9.docx**

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

**NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. | **13 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. | **11 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. | **10 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. | | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **25 to >22.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. | **22 to >19.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. | **19 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. | **17 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. | | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **30 to >26.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | **26 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | **20 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing. | | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | **13 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | **11 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | **10 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. | | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. | | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding | | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct APA format with no errors | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one or two APA format errors | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three or four APA format errors | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains many (five or more) APA format errors | | 5 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |

·
[Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/146166/modules/items/5639997) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/146166/modules/items/5640010)

**## week9.docx**

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

**NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. | **13 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. | **11 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. | **10 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. | | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **25 to >22.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. | **22 to >19.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. | **19 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. | **17 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. | | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **30 to >26.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | **26 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | **20 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing. | | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **15 to >13.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | **13 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | **11 to >10.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | **10 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. | | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. | | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding | | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct APA format with no errors | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains one or two APA format errors | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains three or four APA format errors | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains many (five or more) APA format errors | | 5 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |

·
[Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/146166/modules/items/5639997) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/146166/modules/items/5640010)